• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

1 J. R. R. TOLKIEN. THE LAYS OF BELERIAND. Edited by Christopher Tolkien. Harper Collins Publishers. HarperCollins Publishers 77 -- 85 Fulham Palace Road, Hammersmith, London W6 8JB This paperback edition 1994 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 I Previously published in paperback by Grafton 1992 Reprinted twice First published in Great Britain by George Allen & Unwin 1985 First published by Unwin Paperbacks 1987 (C) George Allen & Unwin (Publishers) Ltd 1985 The text of the commentary by C. S. Lewis on The Lay of Leithian (C) C. S. Lewis PTE Limited 1985 (C) 1990 Frank Richard Williamson and Christopher Reuel Tolkien, executors of the estate of the late John Ronald Reuel Tolkien. ISBN 0 261 10226 5 Printed in Great Britain by The Guernsey Press Co. Ltd, Guernsey, Channel Islands All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publishers. This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired out or otherwise circulated without the publisher's prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. CONTENTS. Preface page1 I THE LAY OF THE CHILDREN Prologue (Hurin and Morgoth) I Turin's Fostering II Beleg III Failivrin 2 Second Version of the Lay: I (Hurin and Morgoth) II Turin's Fostering OF HURIN II POEMS EARLY ABANDONED. The Flight of the Noldoli Fragment of an alliterative Lay of Earendel The Lay of the Fall of Gondolin 3. 6. 8. 29. 56. 95. 104. 13I. 14I. 144. III THE LAY OF LEITHIAN Canto I (Of Thingol) II (Gorlim's betrayal and Beren's revenge) III (Beren's meeting with Luthien) IV (Beren before Thingol) V (Luthien's captivity in Doriath) VI (Beren in Nargothrond) VII (Beren and Felagund before Thu) VIII (Luthien in Nargothrond) IX (The defeat of Thu) X (The attack by Celegorm and Curufin) XI (The disguising of Beren and Luthien and the journey to Angband) XII (Fingolfin and Morgoth; the meeting with Carcharoth) XIII (Beren and Luthien in Angband) XIV (Escape from Angband) Unwritten Cantos Appendix: Commentary by C. S. Lewis 150. 154. 161. 17I. 183. 198. 210. 224 235. 248. 259. 275. 3 284. 294. 306. 308. 315. IV THE LAY OF LEITHIAN RECOMMENCED page 330. Note on the original submission on the Lay of Leithian and The Silmarillion in 1937 Glossary of Obsolete, Archaic, and Rare Words and Meanings Index 364. 368. 373. PREFACE. This third part of 'The History of Middle-earth' contains the two major poems by J. R. R. Tolkien concerned with the legends of the Elder Days: the Lay of the Children of Hurin in alliterative verse, and the Lay of Leithian in octosyllabic couplets. The alliterative poem was composed while my father held appoint- ments at the University of Leeds (1920 -- 5); he abandoned it for the Lay of Leithian at the end of that time, and never turned to it again. I have found no reference to it in any letter or other writing of his that has survived (other than the few words cited on p. 3), and I do not recollect his ever speaking of it. But this poem, which though extending to more than 2000 lines is only a fragment in relation to what he once planned, is the most sustained embodi- ment of his abiding love of the resonance and richness of sound that might be achieved in the ancient English metre. It marks also an important stage in the evolution of the Matter of the Elder Days, and contains passages that strongly illumine his imagin- ation of Beleriand; it was, for example, in this poem that the great redoubt of Nargothrond arose from the primitive caves of the Rodothlim in the Lost Tales, and only in this poem was Nargothrond described. It exists in two versions, the second being a revision and enlargement that proceeds much less far into the story, and both are given in this book. My father worked on the Lay of Leithian for six years, abandoning it in its turn in September 193 I. In 1929 it was read so far as it then went by C. S. Lewis, who sent him a most ingenious commentary on a part of it; I acknowledge with thanks the permission of C. S. Lewis PTE Limited to include this. In 1937 he said in a letter that 'in spite of certain virtuous passages' the Lay of Leithian had 'grave defects' (see p. 366). A decade or more later, he received a detailed, and remarkably unconstrained, criticism of the poem from someone who knew and admired his poetry. I do not know for certain who this was. In choosing 'the staple octosyllabic couplet of romance,' he wrote, 4 my father had chosen one of the most difficult of forms 'if one wishes to avoid monotony and sing-song in a very long poem. I am often astonished by your success, but it is by no means consist- ently maintained.' His strictures on the diction of the Lay included archaisms so archaic that they needed annotation, distorted order, use of emphatic doth or did where there is no emphasis, and language sometimes flat and conventional (in contrast to passages of 'gorgeous description'). There is no record of what my father thought of this criticism (written when The Lord of the Rings was already completed), but it must be associated in some way with the fact that in 1949 or 1950 he returned to the Lay of Leithian and began a revision that soon became virtually a new poem; and relatively little though he wrote of it, its advance on the old version in all those respects in which that had been censured is so great as to give it a sad prominence in the long list of his works that might have been. The new Lay is included in this book, and a page from a fine manuscript of it is reproduced as frontispiece. The sections of both poems are interleaved with commentaries which are primarily concerned to trace the evolution of the legends and the lands they are set in. The two pages reproduced from the Lay of the Children of Hurin (p. 15) are from the original manuscript of the first version, ' lines 297 -- 317 and 3 I 8 -- 33. For differences between the readings of the manuscript and those of the printed text see pp. 4 -- 5. The page from the Lay of Leithian in Elvish script (p. 299) comes from the 'A' version of the original Lay (see pp. 150 -- 1), and there are certain differences in the text from the 'B' version which is that printed. These pages from the original manuscripts are repro- duced with the permission of the Bodleian Library, Oxford, and I thank the staff of the Department of Western Manuscripts at the Bodleian for their assistance. The two earlier volumes in this series (the first and second parts of The Book of Lost Tales) are referred to as 'I' and 'II'. The fourth volume will contain the 'Sketch of the Mythology' (1926), from which the Silmarillion 'tradition' derived; the Quenta Noldorinwa or History of the Noldoli (1930); the first map of the North-west of Middle-earth; the Ambarkanta ('Shape of the World') by Rumil, together with the only existing maps of the entire World; the earliest Annals of Valinor and Annals of Beleriand, by Pengolod the Wise of Gondolin; and the fragments of translations of the Quenta and Annals from Elvish into Anglo-Saxon by AElfwine of England. I. THE LAY OF THE CHILDREN OF HURIN. There exists a substantial manuscript (28 pages long) entitled 'Sketch of the Mythology with especial reference to "The Children of Hurin"', and this 'Sketch' is the next complete narrative, in the prose tradition, after 5 the Lost Tales (though a few fragmentary writings are extant from the intervening time). On the envelope containing this manuscript my father wrote at some later time: Original 'Silmarillion'. Form orig[inally] composed c. 1926 -- 30 for R. W. Reynolds to explain background of 'alliterative version' of Turin R the Dragon: then in progress (unfinished) (begun c. 1918). He seems to have written first '1921' before correcting this to '1918'. R. W. Reynolds taught my father at King Edward's School, Birming- ham (see Humphrey Carpenter, Biography, p. 47). In a passage of his diary written in August 1926 he wrote that 'at the end of last year' he had heard again from R. W. Reynolds, that they had corresponded subse- quently, and that he had sent Reynolds many of his poems, including Tinuviel and Turin ('Tinueiel meets with qualified approval, it is too prolix, but how could I ever cut it down, and the specimen I sent of Turin with little or none'). This would date the 'Sketch' as originally written (it was subsequently heavily revised) definitely in 1926, probably fairly early in the year. It must have accompanied the specimen of Turin (the alliterative poem), the background of which it was written to explain, to Anacapri, where Reynolds was then living in retirement. My father took up his appointment to the Professorship of Anglo- Saxon at Oxford in the winter term (October -- December) of 1925, though for that term he had to continue to teach at Leeds also, since the appointments overlapped.

Load more

  280

Copy Link