DOCSLIB.ORG

XFLR5 Analysis of Foils and Wings Operating at Low Reynolds Numbers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

XFLR5 Analysis of foils and wings operating at low Reynolds numbers Guidelines for QFLR5 v0.03 1/58 October 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Code limitations and domain of validity .......................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 XFLR5's development history.......................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Code structure .................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 3 FOIL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN MODES ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 3.1 General.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 3.2 Direct Analysis [Oper]....................................................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2.1 Foil object 6 3.2.2 Foil Modification 6 3.2.3 Analysis/Polar object 7 3.2.4 Operating Point (OpPoint) object 7 3.2.5 XFoil analysis 8 3.2.6 XFoil errors 9 3.2.7 Session example – Direct Analysis 9 3.3 Full Inverse Design [MDES] and Mixed Inverse Design [QDES].................................................................................................. 9 3.3.1 General 9 3.3.2 Session example – Full Inverse Design 10 3.3.3 Session example – Mixed Inverse Design 10 4 FOIL DESIGN ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 4.1 General............................................................................................................................................................................................ 10 4.2 B-splines main features.................................................................................................................................................................. 11 4.3 Spline Points main features ........................................................................................................................................................... 11 4.4 Leading and trailing edge............................................................................................................................................................... 11 4.5 Output precision.............................................................................................................................................................................. 11 5 3D ANALYSIS .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 11 5.1 Theory - General............................................................................................................................................................................. 11 5.2 Wind and body axis, sign conventions.......................................................................................................................................... 12 5.3 Wing Definition................................................................................................................................................................................ 14 5.4 Reference area for aerodynamic coefficients............................................................................................................................... 15 5.5 Flaps 15 5.6 Body Design.................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 5.6.1 Modeling options 16 5.6.2 Import/export of body data 16 5.7 Plane Definition............................................................................................................................................................................... 16 5.7.1 Surface assemblies 17 5.7.2 Tip Patches 17 5.8 Inertia estimations .......................................................................................................................................................................... 17 5.9 Mesh 19 5.9.1 Panel arrangement - VLM analysis 20 5.9.2 Panel arrangement - 3D panel analysis 20 5.9.3 Body – Wing connections 22 5.10 Symmetry ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 22 5.11 Viscous and inviscid calculations .................................................................................................................................................. 22 5.12 Lifting Line Theory (LLT) - Non Linear.......................................................................................................................................... 23 5.12.1 General 23 Guidelines for QFLR5 v0.03 2/58 October 2009 5.12.2 Limitations of the LLT 25 5.12.3 Precautions with the LLT 25 5.12.4 2D vs. 3D 25 5.12.5 Viscous and inviscid calculations 25 5.12.6 Lift center of pressure 26 5.12.7 Downwash 26 5.13 Vortex Lattice Method (VLM) - Linear........................................................................................................................................... 26 5.13.1 VLM General principles 26 5.13.2 Lift force and lift coefficient 27 5.13.3 Limitations of the VLM 27 5.13.4 VLM alternative method 28 5.13.5 Panel disposition for VLM 29 5.14 3D Panel Method - Linear.............................................................................................................................................................. 30 5.14.1 General Principles 30 5.14.2 Boundary Conditions (BC) 31 5.14.3 Validation 31 5.15 Analysis considerations.................................................................................................................................................................. 33 5.15.1 General Limitations 33 5.15.2 Selection of an Analysis Method 33 5.15.3 Core radius 34 5.15.4 Sideslip 35 5.15.5 Trefftz Plane, far field and near field analysis 35 5.15.6 Linear and non-linear behavior 35 5.15.7 Non-Linear Implementation 37 5.15.8 Tilted Geometry – VLM and 3D Panel Analysis 37 5.15.9 Wake roll-up – VLM and 3D Panel Analysis 39 5.16 Moments.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 41 5.17 Neutral point, Center of pressure, Static Margin.......................................................................................................................... 42 5.18 Efficiency factor............................................................................................................................................................................... 43 5.19 Wing Operating Points and Wing Polars ...................................................................................................................................... 44 5.20 Control analysis – Polar Type 5 and Type 6 ................................................................................................................................ 45 5.20.1 Description 45 5.20.2 Method 45 5.21 Interpolation of the XFoil-generated Polar Mesh.......................................................................................................................... 46 5.22 Streamlines ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 47 5.23 Comparison to experimental results.............................................................................................................................................. 48 5.24 Comparison to wind tunnel data.................................................................................................................................................... 48 5.25 Comparison to Miarex and AVL results ........................................................................................................................................ 51 5.26 Session example – Wing Analysis ................................................................................................................................................ 54 5.27 Non convergences.......................................................................................................................................................................... 55 6 CODE SPECIFICS .......................................................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • The LAS File Format Contains a Header Block, Variable Length

    The LAS File Format Contains a Header Block, Variable Length

    LAS Specification Version 1.2 Approved by ASPRS Board 09/02/2008 LAS 1.2 1 LAS FORMAT VERSION 1.2: This document reflects the second revision of the LAS format specification since its initial version 1.0 release. Version 1.2 retains the same structure as version 1.1 including identical field alignment. LAS 1.1 file Input/Output (I/O) libraries will require slight modifications in order to be compliant with this revision. A LAS 1.1 Reader will read LAS 1.2 (without the new enhancements) with no modifications. A detailed change document that provides both an overview of the changes in the specification as well as the motivation behind each change is available from the ASPRS website in the LIDAR committee section. The additions of LAS 1.2 include: • GPS Absolute Time (as well as GPS Week Time) – LAS 1.0 and LAS 1.1 specified GPS “Week Time” only. This meant that GPS time stamps “rolled over” at midnight on Saturday. This makes processing of LIDAR flight lines that span the time reset difficult. LAS 1.2 allows both GPS Week Time and Absolute GPS Time (POSIX) stamps to be used. • Support for ancillary image data on a per point basis. You can now specify Red, Green, Blue image data on a point by point basis. This is encapsulated in two new point record types (type 2 and type 3). LAS FORMAT DEFINITION: The LAS file is intended to contain LIDAR point data records. The data will generally be put into this format from software (e.g.
  • Key Aspects in 3D File Format Conversions

    Key Aspects in 3D File Format Conversions

    Key Aspects in 3D File Format Conversions Kenton McHenry and Peter Bajcsy Image Spatial Data Analysis Group, NCSA Presented by: Peter Bajcsy National Center for Supercomputing Applications University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Outline • Introduction • What do we know about 3D file formats? • Basic Archival Questions • Is there an optimal format to convert to? • Can we quantify 3D noise introduced during conversions? • NCSA Polyglot to Support Archival Processes • Automation of File Format Conversions • Quality of File Format Conversions • Scalability with Volume • Conclusions • Live demonstration Introduction Introduction to 3D File Format Reality *.k3d *.pdf (*.prc, *.u3d) *.ma, *.mb, *.mp *.w3d *.lwo *.c4d *.dwg *.blend *.iam *.max, *.3ds Introduction: Our Survey about 3D Content • Q: How Many 3D File Formats Exist? • A: We have found more than 140 3D file formats. Many are proprietary file formats. Many are extremely complex (1,200 and more pages of specifications). • Q: How Many Software Packages Support 3D File Format Import, Export and Display? • A: We have documented about 16 software packages. There are many more. Most of them are proprietary/closed source code. Many contain incomplete support of file specifications. Examples of Formats and Stored Content Format Geometry Appearance Scene Animation Faceted Parametric CSG B-Rep Color Material Texture Bump Lights Views Trans. Groups 3ds √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ igs √ √ √ √ √ √ √ lwo √ √ √ √ √ √ obj √ √ √ √ √ √ √ ply √ √ √ √ √ stp √ √ √ √ √ √ wrl √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ u3d √ √ √ √ √
  • NASA Supercritical Airfoils

    NASA Supercritical Airfoils

    NASA Technical Paper 2969 1990 NASA Supercritical Airfoils A Matrix of Family-Related Airfoils Charles D. Harris Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia National Aeronautics-and Space Administration Office of Management Scientific and Technical Information Division Summary wind-tunnel testing. The process consisted of eval- A concerted effort within the National Aero- uating experimental pressure distributions at design and off-design conditions and physically altering the nautics and Space Administration (NASA) during airfoil profiles to yield the best drag characteristics the 1960's and 1970's was directed toward develop- over a range of experimental test conditions. ing practical two-dimensional turbulent airfoils with The insight gained and the design guidelines that good transonic behavior while retaining acceptable were recognized during these early phase 1 investiga- low-speed characteristics and focused on a concept tions, together with transonic, viscous, airfoil anal- referred to as the supercritical airfoil. This dis- ysis codes developed during the same time period, tinctive airfoil shape, based on the concept of local resulted in the design of a matrix of family-related supersonic flow with isentropic recompression, was supercritical airfoils (denoted by the SC(phase 2) characterized by a large leading-edge radius, reduced prefix). curvature over the middle region of the upper surface, and substantial aft camber. The purpose of this report is to summarize the This report summarizes the supercritical airfoil background of the NASA supercritical airfoil devel- development program in a chronological fashion, dis- opment, to discuss some of the airfoil design guide- lines, and to present coordinates of a matrix of cusses some of the design guidelines, and presents family-related supercritical airfoils with thicknesses coordinates of a matrix of family-related super- critical airfoils with thicknesses from 2 to 18 percent from 2 to 18 percent and design lift coefficients from and design lift coefficients from 0 to 1.0.
  • Hydrofoil, Rudder, and Strut Design Issues

    Hydrofoil, Rudder, and Strut Design Issues

    International Hydrofoil Society Correspondence Archives... Hydrofoil, Rudder, and Strut Design Issues (See also links to design texts and other technical information sources on the IHS Links Page) (Last Update: 11 Nov 03) Return to the Archived Messages Contents Page To search current messages, go to the Automated BBS Correspondence Where is Foil Design Data? [11 May 03] Where do I go for specifics about foil design? As in how do I determine the size, aspect ratio, need for winglets, shape, (inverted T vs. inverted Y vs. horizontal V), NASA foil specification . My plan calls for a single foil fully submerged with all control being accomplished with above water airfoils (pitch, roll, direction). Everything above water is conceptually set, but I have limited understanding / knowledge about foils. I understand that there are arrangements combining a lower speed and higher speed foil on the same vertical column, with some type of grooving on the higher speed foil to prevent cavitation at limited angles of attack. With respect to the website http://www.supramar.ch/ there is an article on grooving to avoid cavitation. I anticipate a limited wave surface (off shore wind) so elevation could be limited, and the initial lifting foil would be unlikely to be exposed to resubmersion at speed. Supramar is willing to guide/specify the grooving at no charge, but I need a foil design for their review or at least that seems to be the situation. I have not actually asked for a design proposal. Maybe I should. Actually it is hard to know if my request would even be taken seriously.
  • Fileweaver: Flexible File Management with Automatic Dependency Tracking Julien Gori Han L

    Fileweaver: Flexible File Management with Automatic Dependency Tracking Julien Gori Han L

    FileWeaver: Flexible File Management with Automatic Dependency Tracking Julien Gori Han L. Han Michel Beaudouin-Lafon Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Inria, Laboratoire de Recherche en Informatique F-91400 Orsay, France {jgori, han.han, mbl}@lri.fr ABSTRACT Specialized tools typically load and save information in pro- Knowledge management and sharing involves a variety of spe- prietary and/or binary data formats, such as Matlab1 .mat cialized but isolated software tools, tied together by the files files or SPSS2 .sav files. Knowledge workers have to rely on that these tools use and produce. We interviewed 23 scientists standardized exchange file formats and file format converters and found that they all had difficulties using the file system to communicate information from one application to the other, to keep track of, re-find and maintain consistency among re- leading to a multiplication of files. lated but distributed information. We introduce FileWeaver, a system that automatically detects dependencies among files Moreover, as exemplified by Guo’s “typical” workflow of a without explicit user action, tracks their history, and lets users data scientist [8, Fig. 2.1], knowledge workers’ practices often interact directly with the graphs representing these dependen- consist of several iterations of exploratory, production and cies and version history. Changes to a file can trigger recipes, dissemination phases, in which workers create copies of files either automatically or under user control, to keep the file con- to save their work, file revisions, e.g. to revise the logic of sistent with its dependants. Users can merge variants of a file, their code, and file variants, e.g.
  • Common Object File Format (COFF)

    Common Object File Format (COFF)

    Application Report SPRAAO8–April 2009 Common Object File Format ..................................................................................................................................................... ABSTRACT The assembler and link step create object files in common object file format (COFF). COFF is an implementation of an object file format of the same name that was developed by AT&T for use on UNIX-based systems. This format encourages modular programming and provides powerful and flexible methods for managing code segments and target system memory. This appendix contains technical details about the Texas Instruments COFF object file structure. Much of this information pertains to the symbolic debugging information that is produced by the C compiler. The purpose of this application note is to provide supplementary information on the internal format of COFF object files. Topic .................................................................................................. Page 1 COFF File Structure .................................................................... 2 2 File Header Structure .................................................................. 4 3 Optional File Header Format ........................................................ 5 4 Section Header Structure............................................................. 5 5 Structuring Relocation Information ............................................... 7 6 Symbol Table Structure and Content........................................... 11 SPRAAO8–April 2009
  • Design and Computational Analysis of Winglets

    Design and Computational Analysis of Winglets

    Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education Vol.12 No.7 (2021), 1-9 Research Article Design and Computational Analysis of Winglets V.Madhanraj(1), Kaka Ganesh Chandra(2), Desineni Swprazeeth(3) , Battina Dhanush Gopal(4), Hindustan Institute of Technology and Science, Padur, Chennai. Article History: Received: 10 January 2021; Revised: 12 February 2021; Accepted: 27 March 2021; Published online: 16 April 2021 Abstract: The primary goal of this project is to learn and analyse the aerodynamic performance of wings and various types of winglets and wingtip devices. The objective of this study is to improve a model for various types of winglets and wingtip devices using the software SOLIDWORKS, And Fluent Analysis using the software ANSYS. The best performing aerofoil in terms of aerodynamic efficiency, NACA 64-215, was chosen for wing construction. A wing which is without winglets was simulated, followed by a wing with various winglets at different Cant angles. To determine the aerodynamic efficiency, a wing with a blended winglet and a raked winglet was simulated. In order to found a more efficient wing with winglets, designs of Blended and Raked winglets are modified, and comparison of the performance of winglets by varying with different cant angles, 30° and 60° were performed. As a result of this work, it was concluded that adding a winglet to a wing increases its aerodynamic efficiency in terms of CL/CD. Keywords: Winglets, Wingtip Devices, Blended Winglet, Raked Winglet, Lift, Drag, Vorticity, Co-efficient of Lift, Co- efficient of Drag 1.1 Introduction to Winglets Current global environmental issues such as rising aviation fuel costs and global warming have forced airlines to make adjustments.
  • Human Powered Hydrofoil Design & Analytic Wing Optimization

    Human Powered Hydrofoil Design & Analytic Wing Optimization

    Human Powered Hydrofoil Design & Analytic Wing Optimization Andy Gunkler and Dr. C. Mark Archibald Grove City College Grove City, PA 16127 Email: [email protected] Abstract – Human powered hydrofoil watercraft can have marked performance advantages over displacement-hull craft, but pose significant engineering challenges. The focus of this hydrofoil independent research project was two-fold. First of all, a general vehicle configuration was developed. Secondly, a thorough optimization process was developed for designing lifting foils that are highly efficient over a wide range of speeds. Given a well-defined set of design specifications, such as vehicle weight and desired top speed, an optimal horizontal, non-surface- piercing wing can be engineered. Design variables include foil span, area, planform shape, and airfoil cross section. The optimization begins with analytical expressions of hydrodynamic characteristics such as lift, profile drag, induced drag, surface wave drag, and interference drag. Research of optimization processes developed in the past illuminated instances in which coefficients of lift and drag were assumed to be constant. These shortcuts, made presumably for the sake of simplicity, lead to grossly erroneous regions of calculated drag. The optimization process developed for this study more accurately computes profile drag forces by making use of a variable coefficient of drag which, was found to be a function of the characteristic Reynolds number, required coefficient of lift, and airfoil section. At the desired cruising speed, total drag is minimized while lift is maximized. Next, a strength and rigidity analysis of the foil eliminates designs for which the hydrodynamic parameters produce structurally unsound wings. Incorporating constraints on minimum takeoff speed and power required to stay foil-borne isolates a set of optimized design parameters.
  • Design of a Foiling Optimist

    Design of a Foiling Optimist

    Journal of Sailboat Technology, Article 2018-06 © 2018, The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers. DESIGN OF A FOILING OPTIMIST A. Andersson, A. Barreng, E. Bohnsack, L. Larsson, L. Lundin, G. Olander, R. Sahlberg and E. Werner Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden C. Finnsgård and A. Persson Chalmers University of Technology and SSPA Sweden AB, Sweden M. Brown and J McVeagh SSPA Sweden AB, Sweden Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/jst/article-pdf/3/01/1/2205397/sname-jst-2018-06.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Manuscript received January 16, 2018; accepted September 11, 2018. Abstract: Because of the successful application of hydrofoils on the America's Cup catamarans in the past two campaigns the interest in foiling sailing craft has boosted. Foils have been fitted to a large number of yachts with great success, ranging from dinghies to ocean racers. An interesting question is whether one of the slowest racing boats in the world, the Optimist dinghy, can foil, and if so, at what minimum wind speed. The present paper presents a comprehensive design campaign to answer the two questions. The campaign includes a newly developed Velocity Prediction Program (VPP) for foiling/non-foiling conditions, a wind tunnel test of sail aerodynamics, a towing tank test of hull hydrodynamics and a large number of numerical predictions of foil characteristics. An optimum foil configuration is developed and towing tank tested with satisfactory results. The final proof of the concept is a successful on the water test with stable foiling
  • Image Formats

    Image Formats

    Image Formats Ioannis Rekleitis Many different file formats • JPEG/JFIF • Exif • JPEG 2000 • BMP • GIF • WebP • PNG • HDR raster formats • TIFF • HEIF • PPM, PGM, PBM, • BAT and PNM • BPG CSCE 590: Introduction to Image Processing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_file_formats 2 Many different file formats • JPEG/JFIF (Joint Photographic Experts Group) is a lossy compression method; JPEG- compressed images are usually stored in the JFIF (JPEG File Interchange Format) >ile format. The JPEG/JFIF >ilename extension is JPG or JPEG. Nearly every digital camera can save images in the JPEG/JFIF format, which supports eight-bit grayscale images and 24-bit color images (eight bits each for red, green, and blue). JPEG applies lossy compression to images, which can result in a signi>icant reduction of the >ile size. Applications can determine the degree of compression to apply, and the amount of compression affects the visual quality of the result. When not too great, the compression does not noticeably affect or detract from the image's quality, but JPEG iles suffer generational degradation when repeatedly edited and saved. (JPEG also provides lossless image storage, but the lossless version is not widely supported.) • JPEG 2000 is a compression standard enabling both lossless and lossy storage. The compression methods used are different from the ones in standard JFIF/JPEG; they improve quality and compression ratios, but also require more computational power to process. JPEG 2000 also adds features that are missing in JPEG. It is not nearly as common as JPEG, but it is used currently in professional movie editing and distribution (some digital cinemas, for example, use JPEG 2000 for individual movie frames).
  • File Format Guidelines for Management and Long-Term Retention of Electronic Records

    File Format Guidelines for Management and Long-Term Retention of Electronic Records

    FILE FORMAT GUIDELINES FOR MANAGEMENT AND LONG-TERM RETENTION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS 9/10/2012 State Archives of North Carolina File Format Guidelines for Management and Long-Term Retention of Electronic records Table of Contents 1. GUIDELINES AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................. 3 2. DESCRIPTION OF FORMATS RECOMMENDED FOR LONG-TERM RETENTION ......................... 7 2.1 Word Processing Documents ...................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.1 PDF/A-1a (.pdf) (ISO 19005-1 compliant PDF/A) ........................................................................ 7 2.1.2 OpenDocument Text (.odt) ................................................................................................................... 3 2.1.3 Special Note on Google Docs™ .......................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Plain Text Documents ................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2.1 Plain Text (.txt) US-ASCII or UTF-8 encoding ................................................................................... 6 2.2.2 Comma-separated file (.csv) US-ASCII or UTF-8 encoding ........................................................... 7 2.2.3 Tab-delimited file (.txt) US-ASCII or UTF-8 encoding .................................................................... 8 2.3
  • Modelling Flow Around a NACA 0012 Foil a Report for 3Rd Year, 2Nd Semester Project

    Modelling Flow Around a NACA 0012 Foil a Report for 3Rd Year, 2Nd Semester Project

    Modelling Flow around a NACA 0012 foil A report for 3rd Year, 2nd Semester Project Eamonn Colley [email protected] Supervisor: Tim Gourlay Co‐Supervisor: Andrew King October 2011 Curtin University Perth, Western Australia 1 Abstract The third year project consisted of using open source software (OpenFoam) to model 2D foils – in particular the NACA 0012. It was found that although the flow seemed to simulate what should be happening around the foil, the results did not agree with test programs and approximate theoretical values. Using X‐Foil, a small program that uses a panel method to find the lift, drag and pressure distribution by a boundary layer evaluation algorithm we could compare the results obtained from OpenFOAM. It was determined that the discrepancies in the lift coefficient, drag coefficient and pressure coefficient could be due the mesh not accurate enough around the leading and trailing edge or that unrealistic values were used. This can be improved by refining the mesh around these areas or changing the values to be close matching to a full size helicopter. Experimental work was also completed on a 65‐009 NACA foil. Although the data collected from this experiment could not be used to compare any results made in OpenFOAM, the techniques learnt could be applied to future experiments to improve the quality of data taken. 2 Contents Modelling Flow around a NACA 0012 foil...............................................................................................1 Abstract...................................................................................................................................................2