<<

Iwasawa theory: a climb up the tower Romyar Sharifi

Iwasawa theory is an area of that of algebraic numbers forms a subfield Q of C known emerged from the foundational work of Kenkichi as an algebraic closure of Q. Inside Q sits a subring Iwasawa in the late 1950s and onward. It studies the Z of algebraic integers, consisting of the roots of growth of arithmetic objects, such as class groups, monic polynomials with integer coefficients. in towers of number fields. Its key observation is The field automorphisms of Q form a huge that a part of this growth exhibits a remarkable reg- group called the absolute GQ = ularity, which it aims to describe in terms of values Gal(Q/Q). These automorphisms permute the of meromorphic functions known as L-functions, roots of each rational polynomial, and consequently such as the . this action preserves the algebraic integers. Through such descriptions, Iwasawa theory un- We’ll use F to denote a number field. The inte- veils intricate links between algebraic, geometric, ger ring of F is the subring of algebraic integers and analytic objects of an arithmetic nature. The F in F . It isO a PID if and only if it’s a UFD, but unlike existence of such links is a common theme in many = Z, it need not in general be either. Rather, central areas within arithmetic geometry. So it is Q O is what is known as a Dedekind domain. As that Iwasawa theory has found itself a subject of F Osuch, it has the property that every nonzero ideal continued great interest. This year’s Arizona Win- factors uniquely up to ordering into a product of ter School attracted nearly 300 students hoping to prime ideals. This property provides a replacement learn about it! for unique factorization of elements. A “prime” of The literature on Iwasawa theory is vast and of- F is a nonzero prime ideal of . ten technical, but the underlying ideas are possess- OF ing of an undeniable beauty. I hope to convey some A fractional ideal of F is a nonzero, finitely gen- erated -submodule of F . In particular, nonzero of this, while explaining the original questions of OF ideals of F are fractional ideals, but so for instance Iwasawa theory and giving a sense of the directions O 1 in which the area is heading. are all F -multiples of 2 . The set IF of fractional ideals isO an abelian group under multiplication with identity . The class group Cl of F is the quo- OF F tient of IF by its subgroup of principal fractional ideals generated by nonzero elements of F . The To understand Iwasawa theory requires some knowl- group ClF is trivial if and only if F is a PID. O edge of the background out of which it arose. We at- Remarkably, ClF is finite. Its order hF is known tempt to chart a course, beginning with a whirlwind as the class number. Like the class group itself, it is tour of the elements of algebraic number theory. We the subject of many open questions. For instance, make particular note of two algebraic objects, the work of K. Heegner, A. Baker, and H. Stark in the class group and the unit group of a number field, 1950s and 60s solved a problem of Gauss by show- that play central roles for us. ing that there are exactly nine imaginary quadratic Algebraic numbers are the roots inside the com- fields with class number one: Q(i), Q(√ 2), plex numbers of nonzero polynomials in a single Q(√ 3), Q(√ 7), .... On the other hand, Gauss’− variable with rational coefficients. They lie in finite conjecture− that− there are infinitely many such real field extensions of Q called number fields. The set quadratic fields is still open. Romyar Sharifi is professor of mathematics at UCLA. His email address is [email protected]. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. 1661658 and 1801963.

1 A number field F can be viewed as a subfield at s = 1 and satisfies a functional equation relating of C in multiple ways. That is, any σ GQ gives ζF (s) and ζF (1 s) that involves factors coming an isomorphism σ : F σ(F ), and σ(∈F ) is a sub- from the archimedean− embeddings. The Dedekind field of C as well, so precomposition→ with σ yields a zeta function of Q is the ubiquitous Riemann zeta different “archimedean” embedding of F in C. We function ζ(s). may then place a metric on F by restricting the usual The functional equation tells us that ζF (s) van- × distance function. An embedding of F in C is real ishes to order the rank r of F at s = 0. The if it has image in R and complex if it is not real, in leading term in its Taylor expansionO is given by the which case it has dense image in C. The numbers analytic of real and complex-conjugate pairs of complex em- beddings are respectively denoted r (F ) and r (F ). (r) 1 2 ζF (0) hF RF The unit group × of invertible elements in = . F F r! − w under multiplicationO is deeply intertwined withO the F class group ClF . In fact, these groups are the ker- where wF is the number of roots of unity in F . × nel and cokernel of the map F IF taking an This provides an important instance of a meromor- → element to its principal fractional ideal. Dirichlet’s phic function intertwining the unit and class groups. unit theorem says that × is a direct product of the More broadly, it’s a first fundamental example of OF group of roots of unity in F and a free abelian group the links between analytic and algebraic objects of of rank r = r1(F )+r2(F ) 1. This is proven using arithmetic. − logarithms of absolute values of units with respect To a prime p of F , we can attach a p-adic met- to archimedean embeddings. The regulator RF of ric under which elements are closer together if their F is a nonzero real number defined as a determinant difference lies in a higher power of p. We may of a matrix formed out of such logarithms. complete F with respect to this metric to obtain a The prototypical example is F = Q(√ 5), complete “local” field F that has a markedly non- − p for which F = Z[√ 5]. One has r1(F ) = 0, Euclidean topology. It has a compact valuation ring O × − r2(F ) = 1, and = 1 . We have two factor- p equal to the open and closed unit ball about 0. OF {± } O izations of 6 into irreducible elements of Z[√ 5] For example, the p-adic metric dp on Q is de- − −n that don’t differ up to units: fined by dp(x,y)= p for the largest n Z such that x y pnZ. The completion of Q∈with re- 6 = 2 3=(1+ √ 5)(1 √ 5). − ∈ · − − − spect to dp is called the p-adic numbers Qp, which has valuation ring the p-adic integers Zp. Alterna- The unique factorization into primes that resolves n this for our purposes is tively, Zp is the of the rings Z/p Z under the reduction maps between them. 2 (6) = (2, 1+ √ 5) (3, 1+ √ 5)(3, 1 √ 5). Every prime p of F is maximal in F with fi- − − − − O nite residue field F /p. The Galois group G of The class number of Q(√ 5) is 2, so the class O − a finite Galois extension E/F acts transitively on group is generated by the class of any nonprincipal the set of primes q of E containing p. The stabi- ideal, such as (2, 1+ √ 5) or (3, 1 √ 5). lizer of q in G is called its decomposition group Gq Ramification in an extension− of number± − fields is and is isomorphic to Gal(Eq/Fp). The extension akin to the phenomenon of branching in branched E/q of F /p has cyclic Galois group generated covers in topology. As we’ve implicitly noted, the O NOp by x x . This element lifts to an element of Gq factorization of (2) in Z[√ 5] is (2, 1+ √ 5)2. 7→ − − called a Frobenius element at q. The lift is unique The square is telling us that the same prime is occur- if p is unramified in E/F . It is independent of q if ring (at least) twice in the factorization: this is the G is also abelian, in which case we denote it by ϕp. branching. Whenever this happens in an extension The Hilbert class field HF of F is the largest un- of number fields, we say that the prime of the base ramified abelian extension of F . Here, “unramified” field ramifies in the extension. Only finitely many means that no prime ramifies and no real embedding primes ramify in an extension of number fields. becomes complex. The Artin map taking the class The of F is the unique of a prime p to ϕp provides an isomorphism meromorphic continuation to C of the series ∼ −s ClF Gal(HF /F ). ζF (s)= (Na) , −→ aX⊂OF For example, the Hilbert class field of Q(√ 5) − where a runs over the nonzero ideals of F and is Q(√5,i), and the Artin isomorphism tells us Na is the index of a in . It has a simpleO pole whether or not a prime p of Z[√ 5] is principal OF − 2 via the sign in ϕp(i)= i. Class field theory con- Kummer proved the following, which amounts cerns “reciprocity maps”± generalizing the Artin iso- to a special case of the class number formula. morphism by relaxing the ramification conditions. These in turn can be used to prove reciprocity laws Theorem (Kummer). A prime p is irregular if and generalizing Gauss’ law of quadratic reciprocity. only if p divides the numerator of Bk for some pos- itive even k

Cyclotomic fields In particular, 691 is irregular as it divides B12. Here’s a table of irregular primes p < 150 and the Iwasawa theory has its origins in the study of the indices n of the Bernoulli numbers Bn they divide: arithmetic of cyclotomic fields, a classical area of number theory that dates back to attempts at proving p 37 59 67 101 103 131 149 Fermat’s last theorem in the mid-1800’s. This is a n 32 44 58 68 24 22 130 fascinating subject in its own right, not least for the connections it reveals between Bernoulli numbers The prime 157 divides both B62 and B110. The in- and the structure of cyclotomic class groups. dex of irregularity ip of p is the number of Bernoulli For a positive integer N, the Nth cyclotomic numbers Bk with k

1, the prime ideals that ramify in this range, ip attains a maximum value of 9. Q(ζ2N ) are exactly those dividing N. The integer Regularity of p is equivalent to the triviality of ring of Q(ζN ) is Z[ζN ], so every cyclotomic integer the Sylow p-subgroup A of ClQ(ζp). We call A the is a Z-linear combination of roots of unity. p-part of the class group. So, what more does the Each element σ of Gal(Q(ζN )/Q) carries ζN fact an odd p divides a particular to another primitive Nth root of unity, which has tell us about A? The answer is found in the action i the form ζN for some i prime to N. The map taking of σ to the unit i modulo N provides an isomorphism × ∆ = Gal(Q(ζp)/Q) ∼= (Z/pZ) ∼ × Gal(Q(ζN )/Q) (Z/NZ) on A induced by the ∆-action on field elements. −→ For each δ (Z/pZ)×, there is a unique ele- ×∈ known as the Nth cyclotomic character. ment ω(δ) Zp of order dividing p 1 that reduces For x, y, and z satisfying the Fermat equation to δ. The resulting∈ homomorphism − in odd prime exponent p, we have a factorization × × ω : (Z/pZ) Zp p−1 → p p i p x + y = (x + ζpy)= z is a splitting of the reduction modulo p map. The i=0 group A breaks up as a direct sum Y in Z[ζ ]. Using this, Kummer proved in an 1850 pa- p A = A(i) per that if p is regular, which is to say that p ∤ hQ(ζp), then Fermat’s last theorem holds in exponent p. (Its i∈Z/M(p−1)Z i use lies in the fact that if p is regular, then (x + ζpy) cannot be the pth power of a nonprincipal ideal.) of subgroups It’s known that there are infinitely many irregular (i) i primes but not that there are infinitely many regular A = a A δ(a)= ω(δ) a for all δ ∆ { ∈ | ∈ } primes, though over 60% of primes up to any given number are expected to be regular. for integers i modulo p 1. For obvious reasons, − For k 0, the kth Bernoulli number Bk Q is these are often called ∆-eigenspaces of A. It is such ≥ x ∈ eigenspaces that we shall seek to study, beginning the kth derivative at 0 of the function ex−1 . One has Bk = 0 for odd k 3. Here’s a table of Bernoulli with the following important theorem. numbers for positive≥ even indices: Theorem (Herbrand-Ribet). If k is a positive even k 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 integer with k

Theorem (Iwasawa, Serre). For any finitely gen- The prime p divides the denominator of Bn in low- erated, torsion Λ-module M, there is a pseudo- est form if and only if p 1 divides n by an 1840 − 5 result of Klausen and Von-Staudt. Let’s assume The main conjecture implies that the highest k p 1 does not divide n, since otherwise it’s known power of p dividing Lp(ω ,s) is also the order of that− the relevant eigenspace A(1) = A(p−n) is 0. (p−k) the largest quotient of X∞ upon which T acts as For m n mod p 1, Kummer showed in 1851 (1 + p)s 1. Taking s = 0, the main conjecture ≡ − − that gives the order of A(p−k); it does not, however, tell ζ(1 m) ζ(1 n) mod p. − ≡ − us the isomorphism class (though refinements do This explains why our criterion for regularity re- exist). The main conjecture can also be formulated in quires only indices n

6 Theorem (Iwasawa). There is an isomorphism of There are Hecke operators Tn for each n 1 Λ-modules that act on modular forms by summing over the≥ ac- tion of representatives of the double coset Γ( 1 0 )Γ (k)/ (k) = Λ/(g ). 0 n U∞ C∞ ∼ k as a union of right cosets. A modular form is an As characteristic ideals are multiplicative in eigenform if it is a simultaneous eigenform for all exact sequences of finitely generated, torsion Λ- Hecke operators. If an eigenform is normalized modules, this also tells us unconditionally that the so that a1(f) = 1, then Tn(f) = an(f)f for all main conjecture is equivalent to the equality n 1. The Fourier coefficients an(f) of a nor- malized≥ eigenform f are algebraic numbers that are (k) (k) (k) integral for n 1, and the coefficient field they char( ∞ / ∞ ) = char(X∞ ) E C generate is a number≥ field. in which no L-functions appear. Eisenstein series form a class of modular forms that are not cusp forms. For instance, for a positive even integer k 4, we have an Eisenstein series Modular forms ≥ ∞ One might say that the theme of the work of Ribet B E = k + dk−1qn and Mazur-Wiles is that the study of the geometry k − 2k n=1 of varieties over Q can be used to solve arithmetic X Xd|n questions. Specifically, their work makes use of modular curves and congruences between modu- which is an eigenform of weight k for Γ = SL2(Z) lar forms. The Galois representations attached to itself. When an odd prime p divides ζ(1 k) = modular forms are two-dimensional, presenting a B /k, the constant term of E is zero modulo− p. − k k natural next class of objects to study beyond the one- In this case, the reduction of Ek modulo p may be dimensional abelian characters of class field theory. lifted to a cuspidal eigenform with coefficients in We embark upon another brief tour. the ring of integers of a number field. For exam- The group of matrices in GL2(R) with positive ple, E12 is congruent modulo 691ZJqK to the unique determinant acts by Möbius transformations on the normalized cusp form upper half-plane H of complex numbers with posi- tive imaginary part. A modular curve is a quotient ∞ of H by the action of a subgroup of SL2(Z) that is q (1 qn)24 − determined by congruences among its entries. This n=1 quotient can be compactified by adding in the equiv- Y alence classes of the cusps, which are the rational of weight 12 for SL (Z). numbers and infinity. 2 A modular form f is a holomorphic function To a normalized cuspidal eigenform f of weight of H that transforms under a congruence subgroup k 2, work of Shimura and Deligne attached a p- adic≥ Galois representation ρ : G GL (K ), Γ (in the standard notation, but not to be confused f Q → 2 f with the Galois group appearing in Iwasawa theory) with Kf the field obtained by adjoining to Qp the in a manner prescribed by its “weight” k, and which Fourier coefficients of f. Equivalently, it is a two- is bounded and holomorphic at the cusps. Specifi- dimensional Kf -vector space Vf with a commuting cally, if a b Γ, then GQ-action. This representation ρf is irreducible, it c d ∈ is odd (i.e., it has determinant 1 on complex con- − az + b jugation), and it has the property that the trace of f =(cz + d)kf(z). cz + d ρf (ϕℓ) for a Frobenius element ϕℓ of an unramified   prime over a rational prime ℓ is equal to aℓ(f). A modular form is a cusp form if it is zero at all Inside Vf , there is a rank two module Lf for cusps. the valuation ring f of Kf that is preserved by If ( 1 1 ) Γ, then f(z + 1) = f(z), so f has a the G -action. Roughly,O this says that ρ can 0 1 ∈ Q f Fourier expansion about the cusp at of the form be viewed as taking values in GL ( ). So, it ∞ 2 Of ∞ makes sense to reduce ρf modulo the maximal ideal n of and talk about the resulting representation f = an(f)q f O over the residue field . This n=0 ρ¯f : GQ GL2(Fq) Fq X residual representation→ is unique up to isomorphism with q = e2πiz for z H. If f is a cusp form, then if and only if it is irreducible. Otherwise, its iso- ∈ a0(f) = 0. morphism class depends upon the choice of Lf .

7 The method of Ribet-Mazur-Wiles From this, it follows that one divisibility for all odd eigenspaces implies the other. Ribet and Mazur-Wiles employed congruences be- Later work of Wiles gave a more streamlined tween cusp forms and Eisenstein series to construct perspective, casting the proof in terms of the theory unramified abelian extensions of cyclotomic fields. of families of ordinary modular forms of Haruzo As we’ve noted, if p B for an even k

9 primes and partially vanish locally at the remaining Iwasawa theory of elliptic curves primes. The direct limit over n of these subgroups of 1 H (Gal(Q/F ),E[n]) is the SelE(F ) We turn to the question of how Selmer groups of we wish to study. a rational elliptic curve E grow in the cyclotomic The most important thing to know about the Zp-extension Q∞ of Q. This amounts to studying Selmer group is that it intertwines the Mordell-Weil the finitely generated Λ-module group with a mysterious, conjecturally finite group X = Hom(Sel (Q ), Q /Z ) called the Shafarevich-Tate group XE(F ) of E. E E ∞ p p That is, there is an exact sequence: that is the Pontryagin dual of the direct limit ∞ SelE(Q∞)[p ] of p-power torsion subgroups of the 0 E(F ) Q/Z SelE(F ) XE(F ) 0. → ⊗ → → → Selmer groups SelE(Qn). The elliptic curve E has good reduction at p This is analogous to what happens with cohomol- if its mod p reduction Ep is nonsingular, and it is ogy with coefficients in roots of unity: in that case, then ordinary if Ep has a point of order p. For such the unit and class groups get wrapped up together. elliptic curves, Mazur and Swinnerton-Dyer con- The intertwining of E(Q) and XE(Q) is also structed a p-adic L-function Lp(E,s) interpolating reflected in analytic formulas. One can construct an values of L(E,s) up to certain Euler factors, and L-series for E from the data of the number of Fp- again it is determined by a power series E. Mazur points of mod p reductions of a minimal equation then formulated the following main conjecture.L for E. It has analytic continuation to C by the mod- ularity of rational elliptic curves proven by Wiles, Conjecture (Main conjecture for elliptic curves). Taylor-Wiles, and Breuil-Conrad-Diamond-Taylor, Suppose that E has good ordinary reduction which tells one that E has an associated cuspidal at p and that E(Q)[p] is an irreducible GQ- eigenform with the same L-series. representation. Then XE is Λ-torsion and The Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture, or char(X )=( ). BSD, was formulated in 1965 and is one of the Clay E LE Math Institute’s Millennium Problems. For elliptic curves with complex multiplication, this is equivalent to the main conjecture for imag- Conjecture (Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer). The or- inary quadratic fields and split primes p proven by der of vanishing of the L-function L(E,s) at s = 1 Rubin. The general divisibility char(XE) ( E) is equal to the rank of E(Q). was proven by Kazuya Kato via the method of| EulerL systems [Ka]. Kato’s Euler system is constructed The BSD conjecture has a refined form that links using cohomological products formed from pairs of the leading term of L(E,s) in its Taylor expansion Siegel units on a modular curve parameterizing E, about s = 1 to the orders of the torsion subgroup first studied by A. Beilinson. The other divisibility E(Q)tor of Mordell-Weil and of XE(Q). The con- was proven under fairly mild hypotheses by Chris jectural BSD formula has the form Skinner and using Galois representa- tions attached to automorphic forms on the unitary group GU(2, 2) [SU]. With no analytic class num- L(r)(E, 1) X (Q) Ω R c = | E | E E ℓ ℓ , (1) ber formula that can be used in this setting, one r! E(Q) 2 | tor| Q needs both methods. We mention a bit of what’s known for elliptic where r is the order of vanishing, RE is a regulator curves with good supersingular (i.e., non-ordinary) related to the heights of rational points, the quantity reduction. For p 5, there are in this case not ≥ ΩE is a real period, and each cℓ for a prime ℓ is the one but two Selmer groups constructed by Shinichi number of components of a certain mod ℓ reduction Kobayashi, and two p-adic L-functions constructed of E, all but finitely many being 1. by Rob Pollack. The corresponding main conjec- Much of the progress on BSD to date employs ture was proven by Rubin and Pollack for CM curves Iwasawa theory. For instance, the first major result in 2004. In this case, p does not split in K, and that serves as theoretical evidence for BSD was due the main conjecture is closely related to Rubin’s to Coates-Wiles. As a consequence of their theorem main conjecture without L-functions for imaginary on local units modulo elliptic units, they proved that quadratic fields. The main conjecture for non-CM if r = 0 and E has CM by a subring of for K curves has recently been proven by Xin Wan under a OK with hK = 1, then E(Q) is finite. hypothesis on the congruence subgroup. F. Sprung

10 has additionally treated the prime 3, in particular main conjecture for totally real fields was proven employing work of B.D. Kim and A. Lei in the for- through work of Ritter and Weiss, Burns, and mulation. Kakde, assuming Iwasawa’s conjecture on the van- The main conjecture for elliptic curves implies a ishing of the µ-invariant. The key step is the verifi- p-adic analogue of BSD of Mazur-Tate-Teitelbaum cation of congruences among Deligne-Ribet p-adic that relates the rank of E(Q) to the order of vanish- L-functions over different totally real fields to re- ing of Lp(E,s) at 1. As L(E,s) is complex analytic duce to the main conjecture proven by Wiles. and Lp(E,s) is p-adic analytic, the derivatives are The work of Skinner-Urban has inspired a rush not clearly related, and neither form of BSD obvi- of new theorems on divisibilities in main con- ously implies the other in the case of positive rank. jectures, with recent progress on the construction The order r of vanishing of L(E,s) at s = 1 of Galois representations attached to automorphic is known as the analytic rank of E, and the actual forms in the sense of the pro- rank of E(Q) is known as the algebraic rank. Koly- viding a boon for the area. The construction of vagin used an Euler system of Heegner points and a p-adic L-functions that interpolate special values of theorem of B. Gross and D. Zagier to prove that if complex L-functions is a whole industry unto itself the analytic rank of E is r 1, then the algebraic and often proceeds via distributions formed out of ≤ rank is r and XE(Q) is finite. Both the converse modular symbols or computations of local integrals. to this and the BSD formula follow from the main Euler systems have long had a reputation as dif- conjecture for r = 0. Recent work of Skinner and of ficult to construct that has only recently begun to Wei Zhang implies a converse for r = 1 under mild soften. An approach to construct them via geomet- hypotheses, and for r = 1 significant progress has ric methods starting from cycles on varieties was been made towards the BSD formula as well, par- initiated in work of Bertolini, Darmon, Prasanna, ticularly in work of D. Jetchev, Skinner, and Wan. and Rotger and carried further in work of Loef- fler, Zerbes, Lei, Kings, and Skinner. One typically computes complex and p-adic regulators to prove Recent directions nonvanishing of Euler systems and relate them with (p-adic) L-functions. Iwasawa theory extends to study the growth of other arithmetic objects attached to Galois representa- tions in towers of number fields. Beginning in the Beyond Mazur-Wiles late 1980s, Greenberg proposed main conjectures I end with a brief discussion of a deeper relation- for a whole host of ordinary motivic Galois repre- ship between the geometry of modular curves and sentations, and even continuously p-adically vary- the arithmetic of cyclotomic fields. In a 2011 paper, ing families thereof. Since then, main conjectures I formulated a conjecture relating relative homology have been extended to more general towers, to non- classes α β of paths between cusps on a mod- ordinary families, to finer-grained analogues, and ular curve,{ taken→ } here to be X (p), and cup products even to characteristic p base fields. Recent develop- 1 x y of cyclotomic units in a Galois cohomology ments have seen considerable progress on methods group∪ that agrees with A− modulo p. In fact, there of proof of both divisibilities. Here’s a sampling. is a simple explicit map The early part of the new millennium saw the de- velopment of Iwasawa theory over towers of number a b (1 ζc) (1 ζd) fields with Galois groups that are isomorphic to sub- c → d 7→ − p ∪ − p groups of GLn(Zp) for some n. The breakthrough   came in a paper of Coates, Fukaya, Kato, Sujatha, taking one set of elements to the other (for ad bc = and Venjakob containing a noncommutative main 1 and p ∤ cd). On a certain Eisenstein quotient− of the conjecture for elliptic curves. Invariants playing the plus part of homology, I conjectured this to provide roles of characteristic ideals and p-adic L-functions an inverse to a canonical version of the map that lie in a first K-group of a localization of the non- appeared in the proof of Ribet’s theorem. commutative Iwasawa algebra. Soon after, Fukaya Up the cyclotomic tower, this yields what can and Kato formulated a remarkably general noncom- be viewed as a refinement of the Iwasawa main con- mutative main conjecture that relates closely to the jecture. That is, it provides not only an equality equivariant Tamagawa number conjecture of Burns of characteristic ideals, but an isomorphism given and Flach which in turn generalized a conjecture of by a recipe on special elements. Fukaya and Kato Bloch and Kato on special values of L-functions. proved a major result in this direction in which the At the start of this decade, a noncommutative derivative of the p-adic L-function plays a crucial

11 and potentially unavoidable intermediate role. Their [Iw2] K. Iwasawa, On p-adic L-functions, Ann. of Math. 89 result implies the conjecture for p< 231. (1969), 198–205. MR0269627 Fukaya, Kato, and I expect this to be a spe- cial case of a general phenomenon of the geometry [Ka] K. Kato, p-adic Hodge theory and values of zeta func- tions of modular forms, Cohomologies p-adiques et and topology of locally symmetric spaces of higher applications arithmétiques, III, Astérisque 295 (2004), dimension informing the arithmetic of Galois repre- 117–290. MR2104361 sentations attached to lower-dimensional automor- phic forms. This begs the question of its elliptic [MW] B. Mazur, A. Wiles, Class fields of abelian extensions curve analogue, which is but one of a wealth of of Q, Invent. Math. 76 (1984), 179–330. MR0742853 intriguing possibilities for future directions in Iwa- K. Ribet sawa theory. [Ri] , A modular construction of unramified p- extensions of Q(µp), Invent. Math. 34 (1976), 151– 162. MR0419403 References [Ru] K. Rubin, The “main conjectures” of Iwasawa the- [CW] J. Coates, A. Wiles, On the conjecture of Birch and ory for imaginary quadratic fields, Invent. Math. 103 Swinnerton-Dyer, Invent. Math. 39 (1977), 223–251. (1991), 25–68. MR1079839 MR0463176 [SU] C. Skinner, E. Urban, The Iwasawa main conjec- [FW] B. Ferrero, L. Washington, The Iwasawa invariant tures for GL2, Invent. Math. 195 (2014), 1–227. µp vanishes for abelian number fields, Ann. of Math. MR3148103 109 (1979), 377–395. MR0528968 [Iw1] K. Iwasawa, On Γ-extensions of algebraic number [Wi] A. Wiles, The Iwasawa conjecture for totally fields, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 65 (1959), 183–226. real fields, Ann. of Math. 131 (1990), 493–540. MR0124316 MR1053488

12