Application Development with XML and Java
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
JAXB Release Documentation JAXB Release Documentation Table of Contents
JAXB Release Documentation JAXB Release Documentation Table of Contents Overview .......................................................................................................................... 1 1. Documentation ....................................................................................................... 1 2. Software Licenses ................................................................................................... 1 3. Sample Apps .......................................................................................................... 2 3.1. Using the Runtime Binding Framework ............................................................ 2 Release Notes .................................................................................................................... 6 1. Java™ 2 Platform, Standard Edition (J2SE™) Requirements .......................................... 7 2. Identifying the JAR Files ......................................................................................... 7 3. Locating the Normative Binding Schema .................................................................... 7 4. Changelog ............................................................................................................. 7 4.1. Changes between 2.3.0.1 and 2.4.0 .................................................................. 7 4.2. Changes between 2.3.0 and 2.3.0.1 .................................................................. 7 4.3. Changes between 2.2.11 and 2.3.0 .................................................................. -
Fun Factor: Coding with Xquery a Conversation with Jason Hunter by Ivan Pedruzzi, Senior Product Architect for Stylus Studio
Fun Factor: Coding With XQuery A Conversation with Jason Hunter by Ivan Pedruzzi, Senior Product Architect for Stylus Studio Jason Hunter is the author of Java Servlet Programming and co-author of Java Enterprise Best Practices (both O'Reilly Media), an original contributor to Apache Tomcat, and a member of the expert groups responsible for Servlet, JSP, JAXP, and XQJ (XQuery API for Java) development. Jason is an Apache Member, and as Apache's representative to the Java Community Process Executive Committee he established a landmark agreement for open source Java. He co-created the open source JDOM library to enable optimized Java and XML integration. More recently, Jason's work has focused on XQuery technologies. In addition to helping on XQJ, he co-created BumbleBee, an XQuery test harness, and started XQuery.com, a popular XQuery development portal. Jason presently works as a Senior Engineer with Mark Logic, maker of Content Interaction Server, an XQuery-enabled database for content. Jason is interviewed by Ivan Pedruzzi, Senior Product Architect for Stylus Studio. Stylus Studio is the leading XML IDE for XML data integration, featuring advanced support for XQuery development, including XQuery editing, mapping, debugging and performance profiling. Ivan Pedruzzi: Hi, Jason. Thanks for taking the time to XQuery behind a J2EE server (I have a JSP tag library talk with The Stylus Scoop today. Most of our readers for this) but I’ve found it easier to simply put XQuery are familiar with your past work on Java Servlets; but directly on the web. What you do is put .xqy files on the could you tell us what was behind your more recent server that are XQuery scripts to produce XHTML interest and work in XQuery technologies? pages. -
XML Parsers - a Comparative Study with Respect to Adaptability
XML Parsers - A comparative study with respect to adaptability Bachelor Degree Project in Information Technology Basic level 30 ECTS Spring term 2018 Johan Holm Mats Gustavsson Supervisor: Yacine Atif Examinator: Alan Said Abstract Data migration is common as information needs to be moved and transformed between services and applications. Performance in the context of speed is important and may have a crucial impact on the handling of data. Information can be sent in varying formats and XML is one of the more commonly used. The information that is sent can change in structure from time to time and these changes needs to be handled. The parsers’ ability to handle these changes are described as the property “adaptability”. The transformation of XML files is done with the use of parsing techniques. The parsing techniques have different approaches, for example event-based or memory-based. Each approach has its pros and cons. The aim of this study is to research how three different parsers handle parsing XML documents with varying structures in the context of performance. The chosen parsing techniques are SAX, DOM and VTD. SAX uses an event-based approach while DOM and VTD uses a memory-based. Implementation of the parsers have been made with the purpose to extract information from XML documents an adding it to an ArrayList. The results from this study show that the parsers differ in performance, where DOM overall is the slowest and SAX and VTD perform somewhat equal. Although there are differences in the performance between the parsers depending on what changes are made to the XML document. -
XML and Related Technologies Certification Prep, Part 3: XML Processing Explore How to Parse and Validate XML Documents Plus How to Use Xquery
XML and Related Technologies certification prep, Part 3: XML processing Explore how to parse and validate XML documents plus how to use XQuery Skill Level: Intermediate Mark Lorenz ([email protected]) Senior Application Architect Hatteras Software, Inc. 26 Sep 2006 Parsing and validation represent the core of XML. Knowing how to use these capabilities well is vital to the successful introduction of XML to your project. This tutorial on XML processing teaches you how to parse and validate XML files as well as use XQuery. It is the third tutorial in a series of five tutorials that you can use to help prepare for the IBM certification Test 142, XML and Related Technologies. Section 1. Before you start In this section, you'll find out what to expect from this tutorial and how to get the most out of it. About this series This series of five tutorials helps you prepare to take the IBM certification Test 142, XML and Related Technologies, to attain the IBM Certified Solution Developer - XML and Related Technologies certification. This certification identifies an intermediate-level developer who designs and implements applications that make use of XML and related technologies such as XML Schema, Extensible Stylesheet Language Transformation (XSLT), and XPath. This developer has a strong understanding of XML fundamentals; has knowledge of XML concepts and related technologies; understands how data relates to XML, in particular with issues associated with information modeling, XML processing, XML rendering, and Web XML processing © Copyright IBM Corporation 1994, 2008. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 38 developerWorks® ibm.com/developerWorks services; has a thorough knowledge of core XML-related World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) recommendations; and is familiar with well-known, best practices. -
XML for Java Developers G22.3033-002 Course Roadmap
XML for Java Developers G22.3033-002 Session 1 - Main Theme Markup Language Technologies (Part I) Dr. Jean-Claude Franchitti New York University Computer Science Department Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences 1 Course Roadmap Consider the Spectrum of Applications Architectures Distributed vs. Decentralized Apps + Thick vs. Thin Clients J2EE for eCommerce vs. J2EE/Web Services, JXTA, etc. Learn Specific XML/Java “Patterns” Used for Data/Content Presentation, Data Exchange, and Application Configuration Cover XML/Java Technologies According to their Use in the Various Phases of the Application Development Lifecycle (i.e., Discovery, Design, Development, Deployment, Administration) e.g., Modeling, Configuration Management, Processing, Rendering, Querying, Secure Messaging, etc. Develop XML Applications as Assemblies of Reusable XML- Based Services (Applications of XML + Java Applications) 2 1 Agenda XML Generics Course Logistics, Structure and Objectives History of Meta-Markup Languages XML Applications: Markup Languages XML Information Modeling Applications XML-Based Architectures XML and Java XML Development Tools Summary Class Project Readings Assignment #1a 3 Part I Introduction 4 2 XML Generics XML means eXtensible Markup Language XML expresses the structure of information (i.e., document content) separately from its presentation XSL style sheets are used to convert documents to a presentation format that can be processed by a target presentation device (e.g., HTML in the case of legacy browsers) Need a -
XML: Looking at the Forest Instead of the Trees Guy Lapalme Professor Département D©Informatique Et De Recherche Opérationnelle Université De Montréal
XML: Looking at the Forest Instead of the Trees Guy Lapalme Professor Département d©informatique et de recherche opérationnelle Université de Montréal C.P. 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville Montréal, Québec Canada H3C 3J7 [email protected] http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~lapalme/ForestInsteadOfTheTrees/ Publication date April 14, 2019 XML to PDF by RenderX XEP XSL-FO Formatter, visit us at http://www.renderx.com/ XML: Looking at the Forest Instead of the Trees Guy Lapalme Professor Département d©informatique et de recherche opérationnelle Université de Montréal C.P. 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville Montréal, Québec Canada H3C 3J7 [email protected] http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~lapalme/ForestInsteadOfTheTrees/ Publication date April 14, 2019 Abstract This tutorial gives a high-level overview of the main principles underlying some XML technologies: DTD, XML Schema, RELAX NG, Schematron, XPath, XSL stylesheets, Formatting Objects, DOM, SAX and StAX models of processing. They are presented from the point of view of the computer scientist, without the hype too often associated with them. We do not give a detailed description but we focus on the relations between the main ideas of XML and other computer language technologies. A single compact pretty-print example is used throughout the text to illustrate the processing of an XML structure with XML technologies or with Java programs. We also show how to create an XML document by programming in Java, in Ruby, in Python, in PHP, in E4X (Ecmascript for XML) and in Swift. The source code of the example XML ®les and the programs are available either at the companion web site of this document or by clicking on the ®le name within brackets at the start of the caption of each example. -
High Performance XML Data Retrieval
High Performance XML Data Retrieval Mark V. Scardina Jinyu Wang Group Product Manager & XML Evangelist Senior Product Manager Oracle Corporation Oracle Corporation Agenda y Why XPath for Data Retrieval? y Current XML Data Retrieval Strategies and Issues y High Performance XPath Requirements y Design of Extractor for XPath y Extractor Use Cases Why XPath for Data Retrieval? y W3C Standard for XML Document Navigation since 2001 y Support for XML Schema Data Types in 2.0 y Support for Functions and Operators in 2.0 y Underlies XSLT, XQuery, DOM, XForms, XPointer Current Standards-based Data Retrieval Strategies y Document Object Model (DOM) Parsing y Simple API for XML Parsing (SAX) y Java API for XML Parsing (JAXP) y Streaming API for XML Parsing (StAX) Data Retrieval Using DOM Parsing y Advantages – Dynamic random access to entire document – Supports XPath 1.0 y Disadvantages – DOM In-memory footprint up to 10x doc size – No planned support for XPath 2.0 – Redundant node traversals for multiple XPaths DOM-based XPath Data Retrieval A 1 1 2 2 1 /A/B/C 2 /A/B/C/D B F B 1 2 E C C 2 F D Data Retrieval using SAX/StAX Parsing y Advantages – Stream-based processing for managed memory – Broadcast events for multicasting (SAX) – Pull parsing model for ease of programming and control (StAX) y Disadvantages – No maintenance of hierarchical structure – No XPath Support either 1.0 or 2.0 High Performance Requirements y Retrieve XML data with managed memory resources y Support for documents of all sizes y Handle multiple XPaths with minimum node traversals -
Java Parse Xml Document
Java Parse Xml Document incontrovertibilityPained Swen smarts limites no kindly.grantee Curled invoiced Georges uncommon devocalises after Zollie laughably. mithridatizing snatchily, quite hypotactic. Sicklied Marshall smudges his Once we print and added to access the de facto language that java xml In java dom available and how to apply to have treated as deserializing our web site may sponsor a parser that are frequently by. Processing a large XML file using a SAX parser still requires constant fight But, still the complete hand, parsing complex XML really becomes a mess. Parsing Reading XML file in Java GitHub. The dom4j API download includes a color for parsing XML documents. Thanks for voice clear explanation. JavaxxmlparsersDocumentBuilderparse java code Codota. StringReaderxmlRecords Document doc dbparseis NodeList nodes doc. The DOM has different bindings in different languages. Why you how did you need it, pearson collects your document object consumes a dom. This document describes the Java API for XML Parsing Version 10. For parsing the XML use XPath and for it text file based approach use Java Property Riles Hope that helps a bit Cheers MRB. The first corn is used for documents with possible specific target namespace, the brew for documents without a namespace. Xml allows us learn and written here we create a real time consumption and share data binding, into a good for parsing json. Fast Infoset techniques while man with XML content in Java. Parsing XML using DOM4J Java API BeginnersBookcom. Continued use for building blocks the ui thread however, string in an event in document can update your app to handle to. -
Java API for XML Processing
4 Java API for XML Processing THE Java API for XML Processing (JAXP) is for processing XML data using applications written in the Java programming language. JAXP leverages the parser standards SAX (Simple API for XML Parsing) and DOM (Document Object Model) so that you can choose to parse your data as a stream of events or to build an object representation of it. JAXP also supports the XSLT (XML Stylesheet Language Transformations) standard, giving you control over the pre- sentation of the data and enabling you to convert the data to other XML docu- ments or to other formats, such as HTML. JAXP also provides namespace support, allowing you to work with DTDs that might otherwise have naming conflicts. Designed to be flexible, JAXP allows you to use any XML-compliant parser from within your application. It does this with what is called a “pluggability layer”, which allows you to plug in an implementation of the SAX or DOM APIs. The pluggability layer also allows you to plug in an XSL processor, letting you control how your XML data is displayed. The JAXP APIs The main JAXP APIs are defined in the javax.xml.parsers package. That package contains two vendor-neutral factory classes: SAXParserFactory and 115 116 JAVA API FOR XML PROCESSING DocumentBuilderFactory that give you a SAXParser and a DocumentBuilder, respectively. The DocumentBuilder, in turn, creates DOM-compliant Document object. The factory APIs give you the ability to plug in an XML implementation offered by another vendor without changing your source code. The implementation you get depends on the setting of the javax.xml.parsers.SAXParserFactory and javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory system properties. -
Testing XSLT
Testing XSLT Tony Graham Menteith Consulting Ltd 13 Kelly's Bay Beach Skerries, Co Dublin Ireland [email protected] http://www.menteithconsulting.com Version 1.3 – XML Prague 2009 – 21 March 2009 © 2007–2009 Menteith Consulting Ltd Testing XSLT Testing XSLT Introductions 5 XSLT 5 Testing Source 5 Testing Result 6 Testing Source–Result 6 Testing the Stylesheet 7 Problem Scenarios 16 Errors That Aren't Caught By Other Tests 17 Resources 18 © 2007–2009 Menteith Consulting Ltd 3 Menteith Consulting 4 © 2007–2009 Menteith Consulting Ltd Testing XSLT Testing XSLT 1 • Introduction • Testing Source • Testing Result • Testing Source–Result • Testing the Stylesheet Introductions Who am I? 2 • Tony Graham of Menteith Consulting • XML and XSL/XSLT consultant • Based in Dublin, Ireland • Clients in Ireland, USA, France, UK • Doing XSLT since 1998 • Working with both XSLT 1.0 and XSLT 2.0 XSLT 3 Transforms source tree into result tree by associating patterns with templates XSLT / Stylesheet Source Result Tree Tree / / XSLT Processor © 2007–2009 Menteith Consulting Ltd 5 Menteith Consulting 4 Testing Source • Good if you can do it • May be well-formed or very loose schema • May be constraints that aren't easily checked 5 Testing Result • Good if you can do it • May be well-formed or very loose schema • May be constraints that aren't easily checked, e.g., XSL FO • If HTML, use HTML testing tools, e.g., WebTest • Harder to verify text output 6 Testing Source–Result 6 © 2007–2009 Menteith Consulting Ltd Testing XSLT XSLV Static Validation Tool -
JSR-000206 Java™API for XML Processing (“Specification”)
JSR-000206 Java™API for XML Processing (“Specification”) Version: 1.5 July 16, 2013 Maintenance Lead: Joe Wang Oracle Corporation Feedback: Please send comments to [email protected] Oracle Corporation 500 Oracle Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA ORACLE AMERICA, INC. IS WILLING TO LICENSE THIS SPECIFICATION TO YOU ONLY UPON THE CONDITION THAT YOU ACCEPT ALL OF THE TERMS CONTAINED IN THIS AGREEMENT. PLEASE READ THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT CAREFULLY. BY DOWNLOADING THIS SPECIFICATION, YOU ACCEPT THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE AGREEMENT. IF YOU ARE NOT WILLING TO BE BOUND BY IT, SELECT THE "DECLINE" BUTTON AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE. Specification: <JSR-206 Java™API for XML Processing ("Specification") Version: 1.5 Status: Final Release Specification Lead: Oracle America, Inc. ("Specification Lead") Release: March 2013 Copyright 2013 Oracle America, Inc. All rights reserved. LIMITED LICENSE GRANTS 1. License for Evaluation Purposes. Specification Lead hereby grants you a fully-paid, non-exclusive, non- transferable, worldwide, limited license (without the right to sublicense), under Specification Lead's applicable intellectual property rights to view, download, use and reproduce the Specification only for the purpose of internal evaluation. This includes (i) developing applications intended to run on an implementation of the Specification, provided that such applications do not themselves implement any portion(s) of the Specification, and (ii) discussing the Specification with any third party; and (iii) excerpting brief portions of the Specification in oral or written communications which discuss the Specification provided that such excerpts do not in the aggregate constitute a significant portion of the Specification. -
A Performance Based Comparative Study of Different Apis Used for Reading and Writing XML Files
A Performance Based Comparative Study of Different APIs Used for Reading and Writing XML Files A Thesis submitted to the Graduate School at the University of Cincinnati In Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the School of Electronics and Computing Systems of the College of Engineering and Applied Sciences By Neha Gujarathi Bachelor of Engineering (B. E.), 2009 University of Pune, India Committee Chair: Dr. Carla Purdy ABSTRACT Recently, XML (eXtensible Markup Language) files have become of great importance in business enterprises. Information in the XML files can be easily shared across the web. Thus, extracting data from XML documents and creating XML documents become important topics of discussion. There are many APIs (Application Program Interfaces) available which can perform these operations. For beginners in XML processing, selecting an API for a specific project is a difficult task. In this thesis we compare various APIs that are capable of extracting data and / or creating XML files. The comparison is done based on the performance time for different types of inputs which form different cases. The codes for all the different cases are implemented. Two different systems, one with Windows 7 OS and another with Mac OS are used to perform all the experiments. Using the results found we propose a suitable API for a given condition. In addition to the performance, programming ease for these APIs is taken into consideration as another aspect for comparison. To compare the programming ease, aspects such as number of lines of code, complexity of the code and complexity of understanding the coding for the particular API are considered.