DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project Document Government of Fiji & United Nations Development Programme PROJECT DOCUMENT Project Title: Implementing a Ridge to Reef approach to Preserve Ecosystem Services, Sequester Carbon, Improve Climate Resilience and Sustain Livelihoods in Fiji BRIEF DESCRIPTION The Fiji GEF 5 STAR R2R project’s objective is to preserve biodiversity, ecosystem services, sequester carbon, improve climate resilience and sustain livelihoods through a ridge-to-reef management of priority water catchments on the two main islands of Fiji. The project will run for four years (2015-18) with GEF budget of USD 7.39 million and substantial co- financing from Fiji Government, Private Sector, UNDP and Conservation NGOs (USD 30.24 million). The Fiji R2R project is part of the Program on “Pacific Islands Ridge-to-Reef National Priorities – Integrated Water, Land, Forest and Coastal Management to Preserve Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services, Store carbon, Improve Climate Resilience and Sustain Livelihoods”. This R2R approach in priority catchments will address key environmental issues in an integrated manner. It will bolster Fiji’s national system of marine protected areas through an enhanced, representative and sustainable system of LMMA including greater protection of threatened marine species. Negative impacts of land-based activities on these MPAs will be reduced through development and implementation of integrated catchment management plans, including mangrove protection, the adoption of appropriate sustainable land use practices and riparian restoration in adjoining upstream watersheds as well as terrestrial PAs, restored and rehabilitated forests. These terrestrial PAs, coupled with an increase in the permanent native forest estate, including through assisted natural reforestation of degraded grasslands, will contribute to Fiji’s REDD+ strategy through an increase in forest carbon stocks. The new PAs will help conserve threatened ecosystems, such as lowland tropical rainforest and moist forests, and species such as critically endangered/endangered plants, amphibians and reptiles and freshwater vertebrates and invertebrates. The R2R planning and overarching management approach is comprehensive; it aims to cover all activities within a catchment and out to the sea to ensure natural resource sustainability and biodiversity. The selected priority catchments are Ba River, Tuva River and Waidina River/Rewa Delta on Viti Levu and Labasa River, Vunivia River and Tunuloa district on Vanua Levu: these catchments encompass a diverse and geographically dispersed group with markedly different environments and scales, intensities of land use and degradation, challenges and opportunities and provide an ideal suite of learning environments for biodiversity conservation (Component 1), forest carbon stock protection and increase (Component 2) and integrated natural resources management (Component 3). Broadly based Catchment Management Committees will be established for those catchments, viz. Ba, Labasa, Tuva and Waidina/Rewa which have major catchment-wide matters concerns such as land degradation, sedimentation and flooding. Component 4 (knowledge management) will ensure that project experiences and results are properly captured and widely disseminated, and contribute to data and information systems on biodiversity, forests, climate change, and land, coastal and marine management in Fiji 1 UNDAF Outcome(s): UNDAF for the Pacific Sub-region 2013-2017 – Outcome Area 1: Environmental management, climate change and disaster risk management UNDP Strategic Plan Environment and Sustainable Development Primary Outcome: Output 2.5. Legal and regulatory frameworks, policies and institutions enabled to ensure the conservation, sustainable use, access and benefit sharing of natural resources, biodiversity and ecosystems, in line with international conventions and national legislation UNDP Strategic Plan Secondary Outcome: Output 2.4: Frameworks and dialogue processes engaged for effective and transparent engagement of civil society in national development Executing Entity/Implementing Partner: Ministry of Local Government, Housing and Environment, Government of Fiji Implementing Entity/Responsible Partners: Ministry of Local Government, Housing and Environment, Government of Fiji/UNDP Project Period: 4 years Total resources required: USD37,629,626 Atlas Award ID: 00083111 Project ID: 00091748 Total allocated resources : USD37,629,626 GEFT Agency Project ID: 5216 GEF: USD 7,387,614 Start date: January 2015 UNDP In-kind: USD 450,000 End Date: December 2018 Other: Management Arrangements: NIM National Government: USD 26,713,803 Private Sector: USD 1,210,000 LPAC Meeting Date: 21 October, 2014 NGO Partners: USD 1,868,209 Agreed by Ministry of Strategic Planning, National Development and Statistics, Government of Fiji Date/Month/Year Agreed by Ministry of Local Government, Housing and Environment, Government of Fiji Date/Month/Year Agreed by UNDP: Date/Month/Year 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................................... 8 List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................................. 8 List of Annexes ............................................................................................................................................................ 8 SECTION I: ELABORATION OF THE NARRATIVE ...............................................................................9 PART I: BACKGROUND AND SITUATION ANALYSIS ............................................................................................ 9 1.1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 9 1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT ................................................................................................................... 10 1.3 SECTORAL, INSTITUTIONAL AND POLICY CONTEXT .......................................................................... 18 1.4 BASELINE ANALYSIS AND GAPS .............................................................................................................. 30 PART II: INTERVENTION STRATEGY ..................................................................................................................... 37 2.1 PROJECT RATIONAL AND POLICY CONFORMITY: FIT TO GEF-5 FOCAL AREA STRATEGIES ...... 37 2.2 DESIGN PRINCIPLES AND STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................ 40 2.3 PROJECT GOAL, OBJECTIVE, OUTCOMES AND OUTPUTS ................................................................ 47 2.4 PROJECT INDICATORS ............................................................................................................................. 73 2.4 RISK ANALYSIS AND KEY ASSUMPTIONS .............................................................................................. 75 2.5 INCREMENTAL REASONING AND EXPECTED GLOBAL, NATIONAL AND LOCAL BENEFITS ........ 78 2.6 PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH NATIONAL PRIORITIES OR PLANS ................................................... 79 2.7 COUNTRY OWNERSHIP: COUNTRY ELIGIBILITY AND COUNTRY DRIVENNESS ............................. 83 2.8 SUSTAINABILITY, REPLICABILITY AND POTENTIAL FOR SCALING UP ........................................... 84 2.9 PUBLIC AWARENESS, COMMUNICATIONS, AND MAINSTREAMING STRATEGY ............................. 85 2.10 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SAFEGUARDS .................................................................................... 85 PART III: PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS ................................................................................ 87 3.1 IMPLEMENTATION AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK .................................................................... 87 3.2 STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT ..................................................................................................................... 91 3.3 STAKEHOLDER MAPPING AND ANALYSIS ............................................................................................ 94 3.4 LINKAGES WITH OTHER GEF AND NON-GEF INTERVENTIONS ............................................................ 95 PART IV: MONITORING AND EVALUATION PLAN .............................................................................................. 99 4.1 MONITORING AND REPORTING ............................................................................................................. 99 4.2 INDEPENDENT EVALUATIONS, AUDITS AND FINANCIAL REPORTING ......................................... 102 4.3 LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE SHARING ............................................................................................. 102 4.4 COMMUNICATIONS AND VISIBILITY REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................ 102 4.5 legal context ...................................................................................................................................................... 103 SECTION II: STRATEGIC RESULTS FRAMEWORK (SRF) AND GEF INCREMENT ..............104 PART I: STRATEGIC RESULTS FRAMEWORK .................................................................................................. 104 SECTION III: PROJECT BUDGET, WORKPLAN AND TIMETABLE ........................................120 SECTION IV: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.................................................................................129
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kilaka Forest
    Kilaka Forest Conservation Area Management Plan Copyright: © 2016 Wildlife Conservation Society Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided that the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited withoutprior written consent of the copyright owner. Citation: WCS (2016) Kilaka Forest Conservation Area Management Plan. Wildlife Conservation Society, Suva, Fiji. 34 pp. Photograph (front cover): ©Ruci Lumelume/WCS Graphic design & Layout: cChange NOTE: This management plan may be amended from time to time. To obtain a copy of the current management plan, please contact: Wildlife Conservation Society Fiji Country Program 11 Ma’afu Street Suva Republic of Fiji Islands Telephone: +679 331 5174 Email: [email protected] Kilaka Forest Conservation Area Management Committee Kilaka Village Kubulau District Bua Province Republic of Fiji Kubulau Resource Management Committee Kubulau District Bua Province Republic of Fiji ENDORSEMENT On this day, 24 November, 2016 at Kilaka Village in the district of Kubulau, Bua Province, Vanua Levu in the Republic of Fiji Islands, we the undersigned endorse this management plan and its implementation. We urge the people of all communities in Kubulau and key stakeholders from government, private and non-government sectors to observe the plan and make every effort to ensure effective implementation. Minister, Ministry of Forests Tui
    [Show full text]
  • Report SCEFI Evaluation Final W.Koekebakker.Pdf
    Strengthening Citizen Engagement in Fiji Initiative (SCEFI) Final Evaluation Report Welmoed E. Koekebakker November, 2016 ATLAS project ID: 00093651 EU Contribution Agreement: FED/2013/315-685 Strengthening Citizen Engagement in Fiji Initiative (SCEFI) Final Evaluation Report Welmoed Koekebakker Contents List of acronyms and local terms iv Executive Summary v 1. Introduction 1 Purpose of the evaluation 1 Key findings of the evaluation are: 2 2. Strengthening Citizen Engagement in Fiji Initiative (SCEFI) 3 Intervention logic 4 Grants and Dialogue: interrelated components 5 Implementation modalities 6 Management arrangements and project monitoring 6 3. Evaluation Methodology 7 Evaluation Questions 9 4. SCEFI Achievements and Contribution to Outcome 10 A. Support to 44 Fijian CSOs: achievements, assessment 10 Quantitative and qualitative assessment of the SCEFI CSO grants 10 Meta-assessment 12 4 Examples of Outcome 12 Viseisei Sai Health Centre (VSHC): Empowerment of Single Teenage Mothers 12 Youth Champs for Mental Health (YC4MH): Youth empowerment 13 Pacific Centre for Peacebuilding (PCP) - Post Cyclone support Taveuni 14 Fiji’s Disabled Peoples Federation (FDPF). 16 B. Leadership Dialogue and CSO dialogue with high level stakeholders 16 1. CSO Coalition building and CSO-Government relation building 17 Sustainable Development Goals 17 Strengthening CSO Coalitions in Fiji 17 Support to National Youth Council of Fiji (NYCF) and youth visioning workshop 17 Civil Society - Parliament outreach 18 Youth Advocacy workshop 18 2. Peace and social cohesion support 19 Rotuma: Leadership Training and Dialogue for Chiefs, Community Leaders and Youth 19 Multicultural Youth Dialogues 20 Inter-ethnic dialogue in Rewa 20 Pacific Peace conference 21 3. Post cyclone support 21 Lessons learned on post disaster relief: FRIEND 21 Collaboration SCEFI - Ministry of Youth and Sports: Koro – cash for work 22 Transparency in post disaster relief 22 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Researchspace@Auckland
    http://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz ResearchSpace@Auckland Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: • Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person. • Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of this thesis, and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate. • You will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from their thesis. To request permissions please use the Feedback form on our webpage. http://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/feedback General copyright and disclaimer In addition to the above conditions, authors give their consent for the digital copy of their work to be used subject to the conditions specified on the Library Thesis Consent Form and Deposit Licence. CONNECTING IDENTITIES AND RELATIONSHIPS THROUGH INDIGENOUS EPISTEMOLOGY: THE SOLOMONI OF FIJI ESETA MATEIVITI-TULAVU A thesis in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY The University of Auckland Auckland, New Zealand 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract .................................................................................................................................. vi Dedication ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Cyclone Winston UNOSAT Damage Assessment Activities In
    Tropical Cyclone Winston UNOSAT Damage Assessment Activities in Viti Levu Island, Fiji 09 March 2016 - Report 9 March 2016 Geneva, Switzerland UNOSAT Contact: Postal Address: Email: [email protected] UNITAR – UNOSAT, IEH T: +41 22 767 4020 (UNOSAT Operations) Chemin des Anémones 11, 24/7 hotline: +41 75 411 4998 CH-1219, Genève, Suisse 1 UNITAR - UNOSAT | UNOSAT Damage Assessment Activities in Viti Levu Island - FIJI | 9 March 2016 Tropical Cyclone Winston in Fiji (19 February 2016 – 9 March 2016) Overview A powerful tropical cyclone named “Winston” struck the Southern Pacific and was heading towards the coasts of Fiji. UNITAR - UNOSAT on behalf of UN OCHA activated the International Space Charter on 19 February 2016. On the 20th of February 2016, the cyclone made landfall at 06:30 UTC (18:30 local time) over the north-eastern coast of Viti Levu (Fiji), the main island of the archipelago. The cyclone tracked west across the country, causing damage in four divisions (Western, Central, Eastern and Northern) with more concerns on the Western and Central divisions. According to FIJI Flash Appeal Tropical Cyclone Winston published by UNOCHA on 4 March 2016, 350,000 people living in the cyclone’s path could have been affected (170.000 female and 180,000 male) - equivalent to 40 per cent of Fiji’s population. This includes 120,000 children under the age of 18 (58,000 female and 62,000 male) and more than 3,100 people with disabilities. UNOSAT Damage Assessment UNOSAT triggered the space charter on behalf of UNOCHA the 19th of February 2016 and requested satellite imagery over the areas defined by UNOCHA based on the proximity to the cyclone track, wind speed values and related potential population exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Report on International Religious Freedom » East Asia and Pacific » Fiji
    Fiji Page 1 of 3 Home » Under Secretary for Democracy and Global Affairs » Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor » Releases » International Religious Freedom » 2010 Report on International Religious Freedom » East Asia and Pacific » Fiji Fiji BUREAU OF DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND LABOR International Religious Freedom Report 2010 November 17, 2010 Prior to its abrogation in April 2009, the constitution expressly provided for freedom of religion. Current laws and policies contributed to the generally free practice of religion. The government generally respected religious freedom in practice; however, there was a decline in the status of respect for religious freedom by the government during the reporting period as a result of a ban on the annual conference of the Methodist Church and meetings of its 52 divisions, as well as the criminal prosecution of 27 members of the Church Standing Committee who resolved to go ahead with the 2009 conference despite the announced ban. The harassment of Methodists appeared to stem from the military’s disapproval of links between some church leaders and political parties critical of the military. There were isolated reports of societal abuses or discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, or practice. The U.S. government discusses religious freedom with the government as part of its overall policy to promote human rights. Section I. Religious Demography The country is an archipelago of more than 300 islands with an area of 7,050 square miles and a population of 827,000. Most of the population is concentrated on the main island of Viti Levu. Estimates of religious affiliation were as follows: 52 percent of the population is Christian, 30 percent Hindu, and 7 percent Muslim.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Profile
    Country profile COUNTRY FACTS Fiji Capital Suva Main country facts Gained Habitat for Humanity in Fiji independence Habitat for Humanity started working in Fiji in 1991. Since then, in 1970 Habitat has helped over 69,500 people to build homes and hope through partnerships with governments, bilateral and non-profit Population Over 920,900 organizations and international volunteers. Habitat works on a range of projects throughout the country including disaster Urbanization 54.5 percent response and recovery through repairs and temporary housing live in cities when needed, construction or improvement of water and sanitation systems in rural and remote areas, and disabled Life expectancy 73 years access housing projects. In the financial year ended June 30, 2017, Habitat for Humanity Fiji has helped more than 4,500 Unemployment rate 5.5 percent families through disaster response and over 2,000 families in Population living 31 percent more than 55 communities through water and sanitation below poverty line improvements and built over 1,300 new houses to date. ---------------------------------------------- Source: World Factbook The housing need in Fiji An estimated 140,000 people currently live in substandard housing conditions in informal settlements, and the number has HABITAT FACTS increased by 5 percent from 2007 to 2012. Poverty and inequality continue to be a challenge. According to official statistics, 31 percent of the population lives in poverty. The rising When Habitat started in Fiji cost of living and disasters such as 2016’s Cyclone Winston 1991 increased the poor’s vulnerability. The most vulnerable households also lack piped water, adequate sanitation, Individuals served in FY17 830* electricity or rubbish disposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Sea Reef
    A Living Icon Insured Sustain-web of life creating it-livelihoods woven in it Fiji’s Great Sea Reef Foreword Fiji’s Great Sea Reef (GSR), locally known as ‘Cakaulevu’ or ‘Bai Kei Viti’, remain one of the most productive and biologically diverse reef systems in the Southern Hemisphere. But despite its uniqueness and diversity it remains the most used with its social, cultural, economic and environmental value largely ignored. A Living Icon Insured Stretching for over 200km from the north eastern tip of Udu point in Vanua Levu to Bua at the north- Sustain-web of life creating it-livelihoods woven in it west edge of Vanua Levu, across the Vatu-i-ra passage, veering off along the way, to hug the coastline of Ra and Ba provinces and fusing into the Yasawa Islands, the Great Sea Reef snakes its way across the Fiji’s Great Sea Reef western sections of Fiji’s ocean. Also referred to as Fiji’s Seafood Basket, the reef feeds up to 80 percent of Fiji’s population.There are estimates that the reef system contributes between FJD 12-16 million annually to Fiji’s economy through the inshore fisheries sector, a conservative value. The stories in this book encapsulates the rich tapestry of interdependence between individuals and communities with the GSR, against the rising tide of challenges brought on by climate change through ocean warming and acidification, coral bleaching, sea level rise, and man-made challenges of pollution, overfishing and loss of habitat in the face of economic development. But all is not lost as communities and individuals are strengthened through sheer determination to apply their traditional knowledge, further strengthened by science and research to safeguard and protect the natural resource that is home and livelihood.
    [Show full text]
  • Filling the Gaps: Identifying Candidate Sites to Expand Fiji's National Protected Area Network
    Filling the gaps: identifying candidate sites to expand Fiji's national protected area network Outcomes report from provincial planning meeting, 20-21 September 2010 Stacy Jupiter1, Kasaqa Tora2, Morena Mills3, Rebecca Weeks1,3, Vanessa Adams3, Ingrid Qauqau1, Alumeci Nakeke4, Thomas Tui4, Yashika Nand1, Naushad Yakub1 1 Wildlife Conservation Society Fiji Country Program 2 National Trust of Fiji 3 ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University 4 SeaWeb Asia-Pacific Program This work was supported by an Early Action Grant to the national Protected Area Committee from UNDP‐GEF and a grant to the Wildlife Conservation Society from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation (#10‐94985‐000‐GSS) © 2011 Wildlife Conservation Society This document to be cited as: Jupiter S, Tora K, Mills M, Weeks R, Adams V, Qauqau I, Nakeke A, Tui T, Nand Y, Yakub N (2011) Filling the gaps: identifying candidate sites to expand Fiji's national protected area network. Outcomes report from provincial planning meeting, 20‐21 September 2010. Wildlife Conservation Society, Suva, Fiji, 65 pp. Executive Summary The Fiji national Protected Area Committee (PAC) was established in 2008 under section 8(2) of Fiji's Environment Management Act 2005 in order to advance Fiji's commitments under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)'s Programme of Work on Protected Areas (PoWPA). To date, the PAC has: established national targets for conservation and management; collated existing and new data on species and habitats; identified current protected area boundaries; and determined how much of Fiji's biodiversity is currently protected through terrestrial and marine gap analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Elections and Politics in Contemporary Fiji
    Chiefs and Indians: Elections and Politics in Contemporary Fiji Brij V. Lal 1he Republic of Fiji went to the polls in May 1992, its first election since the military coups of 1987 and the sixth since 1970, when the islands became independent from Great Britain. For many people in Fiji and out­ side, the elections were welcome, marking as they did the republic's first tentative steps toward restoring parliamentary democracy and interna­ tional respectability, and replacing rule by decree with rule by constitu­ tionallaw. The elections were a significant event. Yet, hope mingles eerily with apprehension; the journey back to genuine representative democracy is fraught with difficulties that everyone acknowledges but few know how to resolve. The elections were held under a constitution rejected by half of the pop­ ulation and severely criticized by the international community for its racially discriminatory, antidemocratic provisions. Indigenous Fijian po­ litical solidarity, assiduously promoted since the coups, disintegrated in the face of the election-related tensions within Fijian society. A chief-spon­ sored political party won 30 of the 37 seats in the 7o-seat House of Repre­ sentatives, and was able to form a government only in coalition with other parties. Sitiveni Rabuka, the reluctant politician, became prime minister after gaining the support of the Fiji Labour Party, which he had over­ thrown in 1987, and despite the opposition of his predecessor and para­ mount chief of Lau, Ratu Sir Kamisese Mara. In a further irony, a consti­ tutional system designed to entrench the interests of Fijian chiefs placed a commoner at the national helm.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Fin Fisheries in a Fijian Traditional Fishing Ground, Kubulau District, Vanua Levu
    Status of fin fisheries in a Fijian traditional fishing ground, Kubulau District, Vanua Levu Akuila Cakacaka, Stacy D Jupiter, Daniel P Egli, Wayne Moy This study was supported by grants from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation (2007-31847) and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (540.01). © Wildlife Conservation Society This document should be cited as: Cakacaka A, Jupiter SD, Egli DP, Moy W (2010) Status of fin fisheries in a Fijian traditional fishing ground, Kubulau District, Vanua Levu. Wildlife Conservation Society-Fiji Technical Report no. 06/10. Suva, Fiji, 21 pp. Cover photo © 2009 Wayne Moy: Fishers pulling in gill-net in front of Navatu village Page | 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Research for this study was carried out under a two-year project to support the implementation of Ecosystem-Based Management (EBM) to enhance food security from marine resources in the traditional fishing grounds ( qoliqoli ) of Kubulau District, Vanua Levu, Fiji. Weekly catch per unit effort (CPUE) information was monitored for one year between May 2008 and June 2009 from four villages within Kubulau District in order to assess the fishing effort and the current status of Kubulau’s inshore fisheries following establishment in 2005 of a network of 17 traditionally- managed, periodically harvested areas ( tabu ) and 3 district-wide, no-take marine protected areas (MPAs) within the qoliqoli. The four aims of the study were to: 1. Evaluate differences in CPUE from villages with differing dependencies on marine resources; 2. Assess the different types and preferences of fishing gear used; 3. Determine the main targeted fish and their exploitation rates; and 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Sea Cucumber Fisheries Through Targeted Surveys of Lau Province, Fiji Stacy Jupiter, William Saladrau, Ron Vave
    Assessment of sea cucumber fisheries through targeted surveys of Lau Province, Fiji Stacy Jupiter, William Saladrau, Ron Vave Wildlife Conservation Society Fiji Department of Fisheries University of the South Pacific Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation © 2013 Wildlife Conservation Society, University of the South Pacific, Fiji Department of Fisheries, Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation To be cited as: Jupiter SD, Saladrau W, Vave R (2013) Assessment of sea cucumber fisheries through targeted surveys of Lau Province, Fiji. Wildlife Conservation Society/University of the South Pacific/Fiji Department of Fisheries/Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation, Suva, Fiji, 22 pp. Executive Summary This report details findings from a 24 day survey of sea cucumber resources and the status of the fishery from 10 islands (Cicia, Fulaga, Kabara, Mago, Matuku, Moala, Totoya, Tuvuca, Vanua Vatu, Vanuabalavu) in Lau Province, Fiji. The surveys were conducted by staff from the Fiji Department of Fisheries, the Institute of Applied Sciences and the Wildlife Conservation Society as part of the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition between June 2 and 27, 2013. Direct in-water resource assessments were carried out using standardized protocols developed by the Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC) Regional Fisheries Observatory program. These data were combined with fisher perception surveys, measurements of dried bêche-de-mer processed in villages, and general observations from community discussions to assess the overall status of the fishery. Within species densities of commercially important sea cucumber species across individual islands surveyed ranged from 0 – 132.81 individuals ha-1. Densities were below SPC regional indicator values for all species except for Pearsonothuria graeffei (flowerfish).
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights Situation Overview
    Pacific: Tropical Cyclone Evan Situation Report No. 6 (as of 23 Dec 2012) This report is produced by OCHA Regional Office for the Pacific in collaboration with humanitarian partners. It was issued by the OCHA Regional Office for the Pacific. It covers the period from 21 to 23 December 2012. The next report will be issued on or around 27 December 2012. Highlights • 2,714 people remain in 59 Evacuation Centers in Fiji, down from 11,676 on 20 December. • 1 man is missing at sea in Fiji. • Typhoid outbreak of 18 cases in Ba district, Fiji. • 5,500 people remain in 40 Evacuation Centres in Samoa 2,714 5,500 290 people people houses in Evacuation in Evacuation damaged in Wallis Centers in Fiji Centers in Samoa and Futuna Source: OCHA Regional Office for the Pacific The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do Situation Overview not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Samoa Samoa’s economy will be as hard hit by the impact of Tropical Cyclone Evan as it was by the 2009 tsunami that destroyed 20 villages and killed 143 people, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The tourism industry has already estimated the cost of repairing vital infrastructure to be more than US$6.6 million. Fiji The Government of Fiji reports that 2,714 people remain in 59 evacuation centres from this evening, mainly in the Western Division, a significant decrease from the 11,676 people recorded on 20 December. Aerial surveys have now been completed, though ground assessments are ongoing.
    [Show full text]