https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2019-365 Preprint. Discussion started: 7 October 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. Simulating oceanic radiocarbon with the FAMOUS GCM: implications for its use as a proxy for ventilation and carbon uptake Jennifer E. Dentith1, Ruza F. Ivanovic1, Lauren J. Gregoire1, Julia C. Tindall1, Laura F. Robinson2, and Paul J. Valdes3 5 1School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, LS2 9JT 2School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, BS8 1RJ 3School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, BS8 1SS Correspondence to: Jennifer E. Dentith (
[email protected]) 1 https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2019-365 Preprint. Discussion started: 7 October 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. Abstract. Constraining ocean circulation and its temporal variability is crucial for understanding changes in surface climate and the carbon cycle. Radiocarbon (14C) is often used as a geochemical tracer of ocean circulation, but interpreting ∆14C in geological archives is complex. Isotope-enabled models enable us to directly compare simulated ∆14C values to Δ14C measurements and investigate plausible mechanisms for the observed signals. We have added three new tracers (water age, 5 abiotic 14C, and biotic 14C) to the ocean component of the FAMOUS General Circulation Model to study large-scale ocean circulation and the marine carbon cycle. Following a 10,000 year spin-up, we prescribed the Suess effect (the isotopic imprint of anthropogenic fossil fuel burning) and the bomb pulse (the isotopic imprint of thermonuclear weapons testing) in a transient simulation spanning 1765 to 2000 CE.