DOCSLIB.ORG

Focusing on the Future, 2011-2016 : a Plan for Nebraska's Fish, Wildlife

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Director Rex Amack Deputy Director Jim Douglas Commissioners Chairman Mick Jensen, Blair Vice Chairman Ron Stave, Waterloo 2nd Vice Chairman Norris Marshall, Kearney Jerrod Burke, Curtis Dr. Mark Pinkerton, Wilber Dr. Kent Forney, Lincoln Lynn Berggren, Broken Bow Rex Fisher, Omaha Mark Spurgin, Paxton i Focus on the Future Chairs/Co-chairs Funding, Pat Cole Human Resources, Angie Janda-Craig Internal Communications, Scott Bonertz Information, Scott Bonertz Marketing, Sam Sidner Education, Jeff Rawlinson and Andrea Faas Stewardship, Ted LaGrange Fish and Wildlife Permitting and Commercialization, Dean Rosenthal and Jeff Hoffman Wildlife Technical Assistance, Jeff Hoffman Customer Service, Pat Cole and Kathy Rowlands Law Enforcement, Craig Stover and Ted Blume Big Game, Kit Hams Small Game, Jeff Lusk Migratory Game Birds, Mark Vrtiska Furbearers, Sam Wilson Biological Diversity, Rick Schneider and Kristal Stoner Wildlife Management Areas, Tom Welstead Private Lands and Other Public Lands, Clayton Stalling Missouri River, Gerald Mestl and Gene Zuerlein Rivers, Streams and Canals, Steve Schainost Reservoirs, Brad Newcomb and Jeff Schuckman Community and Urban Lakes, Rick Eades Public Ponds and Pits, Daryl Bauer Private Ponds and Pits, Jeff Blaser Sandhill Lakes, Al Hanson State Parks, Jeff Fields State Historical Parks, Wayne Brandt State Recreational Trails, Tim Montgomery Information Technology, Toni Knust Document Development Jim Douglas, Co-chair Frank Albrecht, Co-chair Rick Holland Katrinka Dicke Jane Gustafson Ted Blume Tim Montgomery Tim Reigert ii Contents Forward ................................................................................................................................iv Introduction ........................................................................................................................1 Plan Structure ................................................................................................................1 North American Model of Conservation ............................................................2 Mission ............................................................................................................................2 Vision................................................................................................................................2 Positioned for the Future ..........................................................................................3 Agency Doctrines Funding..................................................................................................................................4 Human Resources............................................................................................................14 Internal Communication ..............................................................................................16 Information........................................................................................................................18 Marketing ..........................................................................................................................22 Education ..........................................................................................................................28 Wildlife Damage Control..............................................................................................32 Captive and Propagated Wildlife ..............................................................................34 Customer Service ............................................................................................................36 Law Enforcement ............................................................................................................38 Agency Programs Big Game............................................................................................................................46 Small Game ......................................................................................................................54 Migratory Game Birds ..................................................................................................62 Furbearers and Nongame Animals ..........................................................................79 Biological Diversity ........................................................................................................86 Wildlife Management Areas ......................................................................................99 Private Lands and other Public Lands ..................................................................100 Missouri River ................................................................................................................106 Rivers, Streams and Canals ......................................................................................110 Reservoirs ........................................................................................................................114 Community and Urban Lakes ..................................................................................120 Public Pits and Ponds ..................................................................................................123 Private Ponds and Sandpits ......................................................................................126 Sandhills Lakes ..............................................................................................................128 State Parks ......................................................................................................................131 State Historical Parks ..................................................................................................138 State Recreastion Areas..............................................................................................144 State Recreastion Trails ..............................................................................................152 Information Technology ............................................................................................155 Appendix Topic Categorization of Public Input Responses..........................................158 iii Foreword he first long–range agency plan for the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission was completed in 1996. Titled Focusing on the Future – A Plan Tfor Nebraska’s Fish, Wildlife and Parkland Resources, this document served as a management blueprint for Commission activities in the years afterward. Application of the ideas and plans put forth in the document yielded a number of benefits to residents of Nebraska, and established the idea of continuing this type of forward-thinking, creative planning for the future. As time passes, it is appropriate that we monitor our progress, make adjustments where necessary, and continue to plot our path forward into the future. In 2004, this document was reviewed and the progress made on the strategies contained within it assessed. This third edition represents further evaluation and assessment of progress. As of October, 2011, 49 percent of the strategies contained in the plan were in progress and another 25 percent partially or totally completed. The plan has been revised, augmented and updated to reflect the concerns of our constituents and new challenges faced by the agency. It is intended to guide the agency forward for the next two bienniums and contains a high level of detail for key activities. As with previous versions, this edition represents hard work on the part of many employees of the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, as well as valuable input from our constituents, stakeholders and Commissioners. All contributors gave extensive thought to the future of programs and doctrines, considering the path each should follow. This is a guiding document for agency efforts. Resources are limited and new challenges often emerge; both the agency and staff need to be thoughtful and flexible in meeting those challenges. It is understood that we may not be able to accomplish everything in this document; budget, staff and time limitations mean that choices will need to be made and priorities assigned. Nor is this plan intended to usurp decision-making authority, or to replace the role of creativity and hard work. It will, however, serve as a roadmap to help guide the activities of this Commission into the years ahead and to keep our focus on the future of Nebraska’s outdoor resources. My thanks to all who have been part of this process. Rex Amack, Director Nebraska Game and Parks Commission iv Introduction ocusing on the Future is a strategic plan to help and direction box that provides a brief chapter summary, direct The Nebraska Game and Parks Commission’s introductory text that includes past considerations, Fwork activities for the next four years. The current conditions and challenges to be addressed in the document is intended to provide a common understanding future, and the strategic planning component for the next of where the agency will focus efforts to position for four years. For the strategic section of the plan, agency successful delivery of high quality products and services intentions are formatted by a goal, objective (in programs for our public. Defining agency goals, objectives, issues, only), issue, strategy and tactic structure. strategies and tactics through a well articulated and Program and doctrine goals are general statements of transparent document, we seek to establish an broad direction or intent with no time limit.
Recommended publications
  • National Areas32 State Areas33

    National Areas32 State Areas33

    NEBRASKA : THE COR NHUSKER STATE 43 larger cities and counties continue to grow. Between 2000 and 2010, the population of Douglas County—home of Omaha—increased 11.5 percent, while neighboring Sarpy County grew 29.6 percent. Nebraska’s population is becoming more racially and ethnically diverse. The most significant growth has occurred in the Latino population, which is now the state’s largest minority group. From 2000 to 2010, the state’s Latino population increased from 5.5 percent to 9.2 percent, growing at a rate of slightly more than 77 percent. The black population also grew from 3.9 percent to 4.4 percent during that time. While Nebraska’s median age increased from 35.3 in 2000, to 36.2 in 2010 — the number of Nebraskans age 65 and older decreased slightly during the same time period, from 13.6 percent in 2000, to 13.5 percent in 2010. RECREATION AND PLACES OF INTEREST31 National Areas32 Nebraska has two national forest areas with hand-planted trees: the Bessey Ranger District of the Nebraska National Forest in Blaine and Thomas counties, and the Samuel R. McKelvie National Forest in Cherry County. The Pine Ridge Ranger District of the Nebraska National Forest in Dawes and Sioux counties contains native ponderosa pine trees. The U.S. Forest Service also administers the Oglala National Grassland in northwest Nebraska. Within it is Toadstool Geologic Park, a moonscape of eroded badlands containing fossil trackways that are 30 million years old. The Hudson-Meng Bison Bonebed, an archaeological site containing the remains of more than 600 pre- historic bison, also is located within the grassland.
  • Streamflow Depletion Investigations in the Republican River Basin: Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas

    Streamflow Depletion Investigations in the Republican River Basin: Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas

    J. ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, Vol. 27(3) 251-263, 1999 STREAMFLOW DEPLETION INVESTIGATIONS IN THE REPUBLICAN RIVER BASIN: COLORADO, NEBRASKA, AND KANSAS JOZSEF SZILAGYI University of Nebraska–Lincoln ABSTRACT Water is a critical resource in the Great Plains. This study examines the changes in long-term mean annual streamflow in the Republican River basin. In the past decades this basin, shared by three states, Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas, displayed decreased streamflow volumes as the river enters Kansas across the Nebraska-Kansas border compared to values preceding the 1950s. A recent lawsuit filed by Kansas challenges water appropriations in Nebraska. More than half of the source area for this water, however, lies outside of Nebraska. Today a higher percentage of the annual flow is generated within Nebraska (i.e., 75% of the observed mean annual stream- flow at the NE-KS border) than before the 1950s (i.e., 66% of the observed mean annual streamflow) indicating annual streamflow has decreased more dramatically outside of Nebraska than within the state in the past fifty years. INTRODUCTION The Republican River basin’s 64,796 km2 drainage area is shared by three states: Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas (see Figure 1). Nebraska has the largest single share of the drainage area, 25,154 km2 (39% of total); Colorado can claim about 20,000 km2 (31%), while the rest, about 19,583 km2 (30%), belongs to Kansas [1], from which about 12,800 km2 (20%) lies upstream of Hardy, near the Nebraska-Kansas border. Exact figures for the contributing drainage areas (portions of the drainage areas that actually contribute water to the stream) are hard to obtain because these areas in the headwater sections of the basin have been shrinking constantly in the past fifty years.
  • 1985 Annual Report Nebraska Game and Parks Commission

    1985 Annual Report Nebraska Game and Parks Commission

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Publications 1985 1985 Annual Report Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebgamepubs "1985 Annual Report Nebraska Game and Parks Commission" (1985). Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Publications. 89. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebgamepubs/89 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 1985 ANNUAL REPORT Nebraska Game and Parks Commission PURPO SE Husbandry of state's wildlife, park and outdoor recrea tion re sources. in the best long -term interest of the people . GOAL 1: To plan for and implement all policies and programs in an efficient and objective manner . GOAL 2: To maintain a rich and diverse environment in t he l ands and waters of Nebraska . GOAL 3: To provide outdoor recreation opportuni t ies. GOAL 4: To manage wildlife resources fo r maximum be nefit of the people. GOAL 5: To cultivate man' s appreciation of thi s rol e in t he world of nature. Eugene T. Mahoney was appointed to a six-year term as director of the Game and Parks Commis sion , effective July 22, 1976. He was appointed to hi s second term which began April 22, 1982 . TABL E OF CONT ENTS Admini stration 1 Budget & Fi scal ....................................................
  • 1983 Annual Report Nebraska Game and Parks Commission

    1983 Annual Report Nebraska Game and Parks Commission

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Publications 1983 1983 Annual Report Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebgamepubs "1983 Annual Report Nebraska Game and Parks Commission" (1983). Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Publications. 91. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebgamepubs/91 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. I 1983 ANNUAL REPORT ·Nebraska Game and Parks Commission · PURPOSE Husbandry of state's wildlife, park and outdoor recreation resources in the best long-term interests of the people. GOAL 1: To plan for and implement all policies and programs in an efficient and objective manner. GOAL 2: To maintain a rich and diverse environment in the lands and waters of Nebraska. GOAL 3: To provide outdoor recreation opportunities. GOAL 4: To manage wildlil resources for maximum benefit of the people. GOAL 5: To cultivate man's appreciation of his role in the world of nature. Eugene T. Mahoney was appointed to a six-year term as director of the Game and Parks Commission, effective j uly 22, 7976. He was appointed to his second term which began April 22, 7982. TABLE OF CONTENTS Administration .. ............... ........ 5 Outdoor Education Division ... ... .. ........ 34 Budget & Fiscal. ........... .. ........... 7 Parks ... ..... ... ......... .. ......... 36 Engineering ............................ 14 Planning & Programming ............... ..... 45 Fisheries Division .
  • 2011 RFP Invitation Procedures and Forms-R.Pdf

    2011 RFP Invitation Procedures and Forms-R.Pdf

    NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY August 3, 2011 NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION MANAGEMENT PROJECT PROPOSALS INVITATION AND PROCEDURES INVITATION The Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality (NDEQ) is inviting proposals for funding under the Nebraska Nonpoint Source Pollution Management Program authorized through Section 319 of the Clean Water Act as administered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Funding eligibility, criteria for prioritization, application format, and special conditions are outlined in these procedures. Proposals must be on the attached form and be received in the Lincoln office of the NDEQ no later than 4:00 p.m., Central time, Tuesday, September 6, 2011, to be considered for funding. Please direct any questions you may have to: Nonpoint Source Pollution Management Program Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality P.O. Box 98922 Lincoln, NE 68509-8922 Telephone: (402) 471-2186 E-mail: [email protected] Questions must be received by 4:00 p.m., Central time, August 24, 2011. Responses to those questions will be posted on NDEQ’s website, http://deq.ne.gov/, by August 30, 2011. Proposals are to be submitted via e-mail in Word (.doc) or Adobe PDF (.pdf) format, with a subject of: NPS Proposal to: [email protected] 1 NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY PROCEDURES for NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION MANAGEMENT PROJECT PROPOSAL FUNDING UNDER SECTION 319 OF THE FEDERAL CLEAN WATER ACT August 3, 2011 I. INTRODUCTION. A. Procedures for Nonpoint Source Pollution Management Project Proposals. This document constitutes the procedures for eligible organizations to submit proposals for nonpoint source (NPS) management pollution projects to the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality (NDEQ) for funding under Section 319 of the federal Clean Water Act.
  • Article Title: the Nebraska State Historical Society in 1979

    Article Title: the Nebraska State Historical Society in 1979

    Nebraska History posts materials online for your personal use. Please remember that the contents of Nebraska History are copyrighted by the Nebraska State Historical Society (except for materials credited to other institutions). The NSHS retains its copyrights even to materials it posts on the web. For permission to re-use materials or for photo ordering information, please see: http://www.nebraskahistory.org/magazine/permission.htm Nebraska State Historical Society members receive four issues of Nebraska History and four issues of Nebraska History News annually. For membership information, see: http://nebraskahistory.org/admin/members/index.htm Article Title: The Nebraska State Historical Society in 1979 Full Citation: Marvin F Kivett, “The Nebraska State Historical Society in 1979,” Nebraska History 60 (1979): 567-595. URL of article: http://www.nebraskahistory.org/publish/publicat/history/full-text/NH1979NSHS.pdf Date: 7/9/2014 Article Summary: Marvin F Kivett, Director of the Nebraska State Historical Society, presented this summary as part of the Annual Meeting in Lincoln, September 8, 1879. The Society was in its 101st year and had just acquired the old Lincoln Elks Lodge 80 building at 15th and P for its museum. There are sections about the Library, the Archives, the Lincoln Museum, branch museums, historic preservation, archeology, and foundation. Cataloging Information: Names: Robert W Furnas, Samuel Aughey [other names included in photographic listing below] Photographs / Images: Lincoln Elks Club; Flag raising in Fort Robinson
  • FOREST LEGACY PROGRAM ASSESSMENT of NEED for the State of Nebraska

    FOREST LEGACY PROGRAM ASSESSMENT of NEED for the State of Nebraska

    FOREST LEGACY PROGRAM ASSESSMENT OF NEED For the State of Nebraska 1 | Page This document was produced in partnership with the US Forest Service. UNL does not discriminate based upon any protected status. Please see http://www.unl.edu/equity/notice-nondiscrimination 2 | Page Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................ 6 List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................... 6 1. Statement of Purpose .......................................................................................................................... 8 Forest Legacy Background ...................................................................................................................... 8 2. Program Direction .............................................................................................................................. 10 Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................................................. 10 Preparation for this Assessment of Need ............................................................................................. 11 Selection Ranking Procedure ................................................................................................................ 13 3. History and Cultural Heritage ...........................................................................................................
  • 2014 Nebraska Attraction Attendance Counts City Name of Attraction

    2014 Nebraska Attraction Attendance Counts City Name of Attraction

    2014 Nebraska Attraction Attendance Counts % of Total Summer % of Summer Attendance from Attendance Attendance from Out of State (Memorial Day- Out of State City Name of Attraction Total Attendance Visitors Labor Day) Visitors Omaha Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo and Aquarium 1,700,378 34 774,320 38 Raymond Branched Oak State Recreation Area 1,476,467 Ashland Eugene T. Mahoney State Park 1,155,000 Louisville Platte River State Park 878,020 Fremont Fremont Lakes State Recreation Area 874,300 Lake McConaughy and Lake Ogallala State Recreation Ogallala Areas 821,269 Ponca Ponca State Park 783,707 Louisville Louisville Lakes State Recreation Area 572,000 Chadron Chadron State Park 480,300 Burwell Calamus Reservoir State Recreation Area 472,406 Venice Two Rivers State Recreation Area 436,065 Crawford Fort Robinson State Park 410,560 Lincoln Pawnee State Recreation Area 386,994 Omaha Omaha Children's Museum 290,996 30 104,537 42 Hickman Wagon Train State Recreation Area 259,208 North Platte Lake Maloney State Recreation Area 240,050 Lincoln Haymarket Park 227,600 Shubert Indian Cave State Park 224,450 Pierce Willow Creek State Recreation Area 220,350 Ralston Ralston Arena 215,778 13,633 Lincoln Lincoln Children's Zoo 204,000 11 104,000 12 Omaha The Durham Museum 189,654 22 60,735 28 Omaha Lauritzen Gardens and Kenefick Park 173,130 30 77,552 35 Omaha Joslyn Art Museum 163,324 17 39,307 27 Aurora Edgerton Explorit Center 160,578 15 36,835 20 Nebraska City Arbor Lodge State Historical Park and Arboretum 160,000 Minatare Lake Minatare State Recreation Area 155,312 Wahoo Lake Wanahoo State Recreation Area 143,608 Niobrara Niobrara State Park 130,980 Tekamah Summit Lake State Recreation Area 129,896 2014 Nebraska Attraction Attendance Counts Lexington Johnson Lake State Recreation Area 128,662 Ashland Lee G.
  • Cull of the Wild a Contemporary Analysis of Wildlife Trapping in the United States

    Cull of the Wild a Contemporary Analysis of Wildlife Trapping in the United States

    Cull of the Wild A Contemporary Analysis of Wildlife Trapping in the United States Animal Protection Institute Sacramento, California Edited by Camilla H. Fox and Christopher M. Papouchis, MS With special thanks for their contributions to Barbara Lawrie, Dena Jones, MS, Karen Hirsch, Gil Lamont, Nicole Paquette, Esq., Jim Bringle, Monica Engebretson, Debbie Giles, Jean C. Hofve, DVM, Elizabeth Colleran, DVM, and Martin Ring. Funded in part by Edith J. Goode Residuary Trust The William H. & Mattie Wattis Harris Foundation The Norcross Wildlife Foundation Founded in 1968, the Animal Protection Institute is a national nonprofit organization dedicated to advocating for the protection of animals from cruelty and exploitation. Copyright © 2004 Animal Protection Institute Cover and interior design © TLC Graphics, www.TLCGraphics.com Indexing Services: Carolyn Acheson Cover photo: © Jeremy Woodhouse/Photodisc Green All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. For further information about the Animal Protection Institute and its programs, contact: Animal Protection Institute P.O. Box 22505 Sacramento, CA 95822 Phone: (916) 447-3085 Fax: (916) 447-3070 Email: [email protected] Web: www.api4animals.org Printed by Bang Publishing, Brainerd, Minnesota, USA ISBN 0-9709322-0-0 Library of Congress ©2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword . v Preface . vii Introduction . ix CHAPTERS 1. Trapping in North America: A Historical Overview . 1 2. Refuting the Myths . 23 3. Trapping Devices, Methods, and Research . 31 Primary Types of Traps Used by Fur Trappers in the United States .
  • 1984 Annual Report Nebraska Game and Parks Commission

    1984 Annual Report Nebraska Game and Parks Commission

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Publications 1984 1984 Annual Report Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebgamepubs "1984 Annual Report Nebraska Game and Parks Commission" (1984). Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Publications. 90. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebgamepubs/90 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. .' I I I , 1984 ANNUAL REPORT Nebraska Game and Parks Commission PURPOSE Husbandry of state's wildlife, park and outdoor recreation resources in the best long-term interest of the people. GOAL 1: To plan for and implement all policies and programs in an efficient and objective manner. GOAL 2: To maintain a rich and diverse environment in the lands and waters of Nebraska. GOAL 3: To provide outdoor recreation opportunities. GOAL 4: To manage wildlife resources for maximum benefit of the people. GOAL 5: To cultivate man's appreciation of this role in the world of nature. Eugene T. Mahoney was appointed to a six-year term as director of the Game and Parks Commission, effective July 22, 1976. He was appointed to his second term which began April 22, 1982. TABLE OF CONTENTS Administration 1 Budget & Fiscal . 4 Engineering ................................................ 13 Fisheries Division ........................................ 20 Information & Education ................................... 25 Law Enforcement .....................• ..•..................... 27 Operations and Construction .............••................
  • National Areas36 State Areas37

    National Areas36 State Areas37

    46 NEBRASKA: THE CORNHUSKER STATE RECREATION AND PLACES OF INTEREST35 National Areas36 Nebraska has two national forest areas with hand-planted trees: the Bessey Ranger District of the Nebraska National Forest in Blaine and Thomas counties, and the Samuel R. McKelvie National Forest in Cherry County. The Pine Ridge Ranger District of the Nebraska National Forest in Dawes and Sioux counties contains native ponderosa pine trees. The U.S. Forest Service also administers the Oglala National Grassland in northwest Nebraska. Within it is Toadstool Geologic Park, a moonscape of eroded badlands containing fossil trackways that are 30 million years old. The Hudson-Meng Bison Bonebed, an archaeological site containing the remains of more than 600 pre- historic bison, also is located within the grassland. Agate Fossil Beds National Monument in Sioux County contains animal fossils. Homestead National Monument of America near Beatrice was built on one of the fi rst pieces of land claimed under the U.S. Homestead Act of 1862. Scotts Bluff National Monument near Scottsbluff is an 800-foot bluff that was a landmark for pioneers on the Oregon Trail. Chimney Rock National Historic Site, a 500-foot spire carved by the elements, is near Bayard. It also served as a landmark for Oregon Trail travelers. The Niobrara National Scenic River is a popular canoeing river. The Missouri/Niobrara/ Verdigre Creek National Recreational Rivers and the Missouri National Recreational River offer land and water recreation and views of the waterways similar to those the Lewis and Clark expedition saw as they crossed the Great Plains. State Areas37 Nebraska’s eight state parks are Eugene T.
  • LPSNRD Water Quality Management Plan

    LPSNRD Water Quality Management Plan

    LOWER PLATTE SOUTH NRD WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN PREPARED MAY 2019 FOR THE LOWER PLATTE SOUTH NRD BY JEO CONSULTING GROUP, INC. District-Wide Water Quality Management Plan Lower Platte South NRD THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK JEO Consulting Group, Inc. ii District-Wide Water Quality Management Plan Lower Platte South NRD Lower Platte South Natural Resources District District-Wide Water Quality Management Plan Prepared: March 2019 Accepted by EPA: May 2019 Acknowledgements Preparation of this watershed plan was made possible by funding assistance provided by the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality Nonpoint Source Pollution Management (CWA Section 319) Program. JEO Consulting Group, Inc. iii District-Wide Water Quality Management Plan Lower Platte South NRD Prepared for: Lower Platte South Natural Resources District Prepared by: JEO Consulting Group, Inc. JEO Project Number: 160602.00 This watershed management plan was prepared to guide the Lower Platte South Natural Resources District in developing and implementing future projects to improve water quality, hydrology, and aquatic resources within their District. The plan may also serve as a basis for seeking financial support for those projects. It has been written with guidance published in EPA’s “Handbook for Developing Watershed Plans to Restore and Protect Our Waters,” updated March 2008, including EPA’s Nine-Elements of a Successful Watershed Plan; as well as NDEQ’s Guidance for Writing Basin Management Plans, updated November 2016. The planning process utilized a Community Based Approach. Lower Platte South NRD Contact Information: David Potter, Assistant General Manager P.O. Box 83581 3125 Portia Street Lincoln, NE 68501 402.476.2729 [email protected] JEO Contact Information: ADAM RUPE | Natural Resources Specialist JEO CONSULTING GROUP INC 2700 Fletcher Avenue | Lincoln, Nebraska 68504-1113 d: 402.474.8742 | m: 402.322.0377 | o: 402.435.3080 | f: 402.435.4110 [email protected] JEO Consulting Group, Inc.