DOCSLIB.ORG

Pollen Analysis of the Tule Springs Site, Nevada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pollen Analysis of the Tule Springs Site, Nevada Pollen analysis of the Tule Springs site, Nevada Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Mehringer, Peter J. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 25/09/2021 21:06:58 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/565175 POLLEN ANALYSIS OF THE TULE SPRINGS SITE, NEVADA by Peter J. Mehringer, Jr. A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOCHRONOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 6 8 ■ THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction by P e ter J. Mehrlnger, Jr._______________________ entitled Pollen Analysis of the Tule Springs Site,_____ Nevada_________________________________ ______ be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy_______________________ y -/ o - 6 5- Dissertation Director Date After inspection of the final copy of the dissertation, the following members of the Final Examination Committee concur in its approval and recommend its acceptance:* This approval and acceptance is contingent on the candidate1s adequate performance and defense of this dissertation at the final oral examination. The inclusion of this sheet bound into the library copy of the dissertation is evidence of satisfactory performance at the final examination. STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This dissertation has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this dissertation are allow­ able without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manu­ script in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank Drs. P. S. Martin, C. V. Haynes, Jr., P. E. Damon, W. L. Nutting, and F. G. Werner for critical comment and advice regarding the manuscript. Special appreciation is due Dr. P. S. Martin for directing the research and offering many valuable sug­ gestions throughout the course of the study. It is a sincere pleasure to acknowledge the co­ operation of Dr. C. V. Haynes, Jr. Without his initial geological studies and continued interest in the strati­ graphy, chronology and paleoecology of the Tule Springs site this research would not have been possible. Financial support was provided by National Science Foundation Grants GS 23 to Dr. R. Shutler, Jr., Nevada State Museum, and G 219^4 and GB 1959 to Dr. P. S. Martin, University of Arizona ill TABLE OP CONTENTS Page LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS........ vi LIST OF TABLES...................................... ix ABSTRACT............................................ x INTRODUCTION................................... 1 Historical Background....................... 1 The Study Area............................ 3 Pollen Analysis and Southwestern Archaeo­ logy ........................................ 6 PALYNOLOGICAL METHODS AND PROCEDURES IN THE ARID SOUTHWEST.............................................. 13 Collection of Pollen Samples..... ....... .. 13 Extraction of Pollen Samples............... 17 Interpreting the Fossil Pollen Record...... 22 VEGETATION AND MODERN POLLEN SAMPLES.................. 43 THE FOSSIL POLLEN RECORD............................ 82 Introduction................................ 82 Cattail Pollen....... 90 The Pine Pollen Problem..................... 9^ Unit B_.............................. 99 2 Unit D ...................... 104 iv V TABLE OF CONTENTS— Continued Page Unit E1..................................... 108 Unit Eg.............................. 118 Unit F and G ................................ 123 DISCUSSION.......................................... 125 A PLEISTOCENE (WISCONSIN) WOODLAND CORRIDOR IN THE EASTERN MOHAVE DESERT....... 133 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS............................. 143 LITERATURE CITED.................................... 147 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. Map of study area............................ 4 2. The Tule Springs site area showing Las Vegas Wash and the LasVegas Range..... ............ 5 3. A pollen diagram from the Lehner site, south­ eastern Arizona, illustrating the use of double fixed sums........... 38 4. A pollen diagram of the major pollen types recovered from soil surface samples, in a transect in Kyle Canyon, Charleston Mount­ ains.......................... 44 5 . Soil surface sample locality 25, at 885 meters................................... 71 6. Modern spring sample locality 28, Corn Creek Springs..................... 71 7 . A view from the Tule Springs site area look­ ing toward Kyle Canyon, Charleston Mountains. 71 8. Modern surface sample locality 1, on the Kyle Canyon Fan at 900 meters.................... 71 9. Modern spring sample locality 27 and modern surface sample locality 26, at Corn Creek Springs...................................... 72 10. Modern surface sample locality 5 , on the Kyle Canyon fan at 1090 meters.... ............... 75 11. The vegetation between modern surface sample localities 9 and 10, Kyle Canyon at 1500 meters........................... 75 12. Modern surface sample locality 12, Kyle Canyon at 1710 meters.................. 75 vi vli LIST OP ILLUSTRATIONS— Continued Figure Page 13. Modern surface sample locality 15, Kyle Canyon at 2105 meters....................... 75 14. A blackbush-Joshua tree community at 1700 meters. Cold Creek Road, Charleston Mount­ ains............................. 76 15. Modern surface sample locality 11, Kyle Canyon at 1615 meters........................ 77 16. Modern surface sample locality 16, Kyle Canyon at 2165 meters................ 8l 17. Modern surface sample locality 17, Kyle Canyon at 2285 meters........................ 8l 18. Modern surface sample locality 18, Charleston Park, Kyle Canyon at 2410 meters............ 8l 19. Modern surface sample locality 19, in Lee Canyon at 2560 meters............. 8l 20. Photomicrographs of fossil pollen from the Tule Springs site.......... 83 21. Photomicrographs of fossil pollen from the Tule Springs site......... 84 22. Photomicrographs of fossil pollen from the Tule Springs site........................... 85 23. Photomicrographs of fossil pollen from the Tule Springs site.................... 86 24. Photomicrographs of fossil pollen from the Tule Springs site........................... 87 25. Photomicrographs of fossil pollen from the Tule Springs site.................. 88 26. An area-elevation graph for the Spring Range. 96 viii LIST.OF ILLUSTRATIONS--Continued Figure Page 27. Pollen Profile I, a pollen diagram from spring-laid clay and silt of unit Bg........ 100 28. Pollen Profile II, a pollen"diagram from Unit D lake sediments........................ 105 29. Pollen Profile III, a pollen diagram from spring mount deposits................ 109 30. Spring mounds 4 and 4A, and the Charleston Mountains.................................... 110 31. Pollen Profile IV, a pollen diagram from the alluvial sequence of the Fenley Hunter locality......................... Ill 32. Pollen Profile V, miscellaneous fossil pollen counts from various localities in the Tule Springs site area............................ 112 33. The hypothetical position of Late Pleistocene woodland and forest in the eastern Mohave Desert............. 134 34. Present distribution and fossil localities of certain small mammals in the eastern Mohave Desert 141 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Extraction Procedure for Southwestern Alluvial Pollen Samples................. 18 2. Relative Frequency of Pollen Types from Mono Lake, California...................... 33 3 . Modern Pollen Samples from the East Slope of the Spring Range and the Las Vegas Valley, Southern Nevada.................... 45 4 . Approximate Age of the Stratigraphic Units Shown on the Pollen Diagrams................ 90 5 . Typha Pollen Counts in Tetrads, Dyads, and Monads................................ 91 ix ABSTRACT Palynological investigations of the Tule Springs Site, 18 kilometers north of Las Vegas, Nevada, were initiated as part of interdisciplinary studies to estab­ lish the geochronology of the deposits and association of artifacts, radiocarbon dates, and the fossil fauna and flora, and to relate these to the Late Quaternary vegeta­ tion history of the Las Vegas Valley. Fossil pollen spectra were obtained from alluvial, lake and spring deposits. For comparative purposes, modern soil surface pollen samples were collected from the plant communities of the Las Vegas Valley and the east slope of the Charleston Mountains. Pollen analysis has proved an important tool for Southwestern archaeologists in the reconstruction of past environments, in dating archaeological horizons and in providing information on the past utilization of cultivated and wild plants. The scarcity of ideal depositional environments in the Southwestern
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tectonic Influences on the Spatial and Temporal Evolution of the Walker Lane: an Incipient Transform Fault Along the Evolving Pacific – North American Plate Boundary
    Arizona Geological Society Digest 22 2008 Tectonic influences on the spatial and temporal evolution of the Walker Lane: An incipient transform fault along the evolving Pacific – North American plate boundary James E. Faulds and Christopher D. Henry Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, 89557, USA ABSTRACT Since ~30 Ma, western North America has been evolving from an Andean type mar- gin to a dextral transform boundary. Transform growth has been marked by retreat of magmatic arcs, gravitational collapse of orogenic highlands, and periodic inland steps of the San Andreas fault system. In the western Great Basin, a system of dextral faults, known as the Walker Lane (WL) in the north and eastern California shear zone (ECSZ) in the south, currently accommodates ~20% of the Pacific – North America dextral motion. In contrast to the continuous 1100-km-long San Andreas system, discontinuous dextral faults with relatively short lengths (<10-250 km) characterize the WL-ECSZ. Cumulative dextral displacement across the WL-ECSZ generally decreases northward from ≥60 km in southern and east-central California, to ~25 km in northwest Nevada, to negligible in northeast California. GPS geodetic strain rates average ~10 mm/yr across the WL-ECSZ in the western Great Basin but are much less in the eastern WL near Las Vegas (<2 mm/ yr) and along the northwest terminus in northeast California (~2.5 mm/yr). The spatial and temporal evolution of the WL-ECSZ is closely linked to major plate boundary events along the San Andreas fault system. For example, the early Miocene elimination of microplates along the southern California coast, southward steps in the Rivera triple junction at 19-16 Ma and 13 Ma, and an increase in relative plate motions ~12 Ma collectively induced the first major episode of deformation in the WL-ECSZ, which began ~13 Ma along the N60°W-trending Las Vegas Valley shear zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Sphaeralcea Coccinea Scarlet Globemallow
    Sphaeralcea coccinea Scarlet Globemallow by Kathy Lloyd Montana Native Plant Society Photo: Drake Barton Sphaeralcea coccinea (Scarlet Globemallow) is not an authentic Lewis and Clark collection. They believe the scarlet globemallow plants on that sheet carlet globemallow, a member of the mallow were grown from seed collected by Thomas Nuttall family (Malvaceae) was collected by in 1811. The other specimen sheet contains plants SMeriwether Lewis on July 20, 1806 along the Marias collected by Meriwether Lewis in Montana. The River in present-day Toole County. On the same label on the specimen, applied by the botanist day he also collected Gardner’s saltbush (Atriplex Frederick Pursh, says, “A malvaceous Small plant gardneri) and greasewood (Sarcobatus probably a Species of Malope. Plains of Missouri. vermiculatus). Lewis and his small band of men Jul. 20th 1806.” Lewis, always the eager naturalist, were attempting to follow the Marias River drainage took time to write in his journal that day, “the wild north to determine where the river began. They liquorice and sunflower are very abundant in the were hoping to claim land for the United States to plains and river bottoms, the latter is now in full the most northern parallel of the Missouri River blume; the silkgrass and sand rush are also system. Although Lewis did not succeed in staking common.” a claim for more land, he did make significant Scarlet globemallow occurs in dry grassland discoveries that advanced the knowledge of the prairies and plains from Alberta, Saskatchewan, and flora, fauna, ecology, and soils in the area west of Manitoba in Canada, south and eastward to Arizona, the Mississippi River.
    [Show full text]
  • GOOSEBERRYLEAF GLOBEMALLOW Sphaeralcea Grossulariifolia (Hook
    GOOSEBERRYLEAF GLOBEMALLOW Sphaeralcea grossulariifolia (Hook. & Arn.) Rydb. Malvaceae – Mallow family Corey L. Gucker & Nancy L. Shaw | 2018 ORGANIZATION NOMENCLATURE Sphaeralcea grossulariifolia (Hook. & Arn.) Names, subtaxa, chromosome number(s), hybridization. Rydb., hereafter referred to as gooseberryleaf globemallow, belongs to the Malveae tribe of the Malvaceae or mallow family (Kearney 1935; La Duke 2016). Range, habitat, plant associations, elevation, soils. NRCS Plant Code. SPGR2 (USDA NRCS 2017). Subtaxa. The Flora of North America (La Duke 2016) does not recognize any varieties or Life form, morphology, distinguishing characteristics, reproduction. subspecies. Synonyms. Malvastrum coccineum (Nuttall) A. Gray var. grossulariifolium (Hooker & Arnott) Growth rate, successional status, disturbance ecology, importance to animals/people. Torrey, M. grossulariifolium (Hooker & Arnott) A. Gray, Sida grossulariifolia Hooker & Arnott, Sphaeralcea grossulariifolia subsp. pedata Current or potential uses in restoration. (Torrey ex A. Gray) Kearney, S. grossulariifolia var. pedata (Torrey ex A. Gray) Kearney, S. pedata Torrey ex A. Gray (La Duke 2016). Seed sourcing, wildland seed collection, seed cleaning, storage, Common Names. Gooseberryleaf globemallow, testing and marketing standards. current-leaf globemallow (La Duke 2016). Chromosome Number. Chromosome number is stable, 2n = 20, and plants are diploid (La Duke Recommendations/guidelines for producing seed. 2016). Hybridization. Hybridization occurs within the Sphaeralcea genus.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Final Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV0S010-2009-1014-EA May 2016 Eastern Nevada Transmission Project APPLICANT Silver State Energy Association GENERAL LOCATION Clark County, Nevada BLM CASE FILE SERIAL NUMBER N-086357 PREPARING OFFICE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Las Vegas Field Office 4701 N. Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, NV 89130 Phone: (702) 515-5172 Fax: (702) 515-5010 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Background ........................................................................................................1 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action .........................................................................................2 1.4 Decisions to be Made .....................................................................................................7 1.5 BLM Policies, Plans, Authorizing Actions, and Permit Requirements .........................7 Chapter 2 - Proposed Action and Alternatives ........................................................................9 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 2.1.1 Regulatory Framework for Alternatives
    [Show full text]
  • Additions to the Late Pleistocene Vertebrate Paleontology of the Las
    Additions to the Late Pleistocene Vertebrate Paleontology of ABSTRACT the Las Vegas Formation, Clark County, Nevada DISCUSSION Studies from the 1930s through the 1960s documented one of the most significant late The detailed mapping of over 500 vertebrate paleontologic localities Pleistocene faunas from the Mojave Desert in the Tule Springs area of North Las Vegas. in the upper Las Vegas Wash proved to be an interesting challenge in Recent field investigations in North Las Vegas by the San Bernardino County Museum Kathleen Springer, J. Christopher Sagebiel, Eric Scott, Craig Manker and Chris Austin terms of discerning the stratigraphy. Very little geologic have broadened our knowledge of this fauna across the Las Vegas Wash.Seven units, investigation had been performed in this region since the 1967 work designated A through G, have been defined in the section of the Las Vegas Wash near Division of Geological Sciences, San Bernardino County Museum, Redlands, California of Haynes. That very detailed study was geographically limited to Tule Springs State Park. Units B, D, and E have proven fossiliferous in the area of the the Tule Springs archaeologic investigation and the very near Tule Springs State Park, and date to>40,000 ybp, approximately 25,500 ybp, and about environs at a reconnaissance level. Our study area, falling mostly 14,500 to 9,300 ybp,respectively. Research across the Las Vegas Wash has resulted in within the Gass Peak S.W. 7.5’ U.S.G.S. topographic sheet, had not the discovery of several hundred new fossil localities. In describing the geology at these BACKGROUND been mapped.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Las Vegas Wash/ Tule Springs, Nevada Reconnaissance Report
    (J Æ NATIONAL PARK National Park Service SERVICE June 2010 U. S. Department of the Interior S y A 36// 3^ 39?. Upper Las Vegas Wash/ Tule Springs, Nevada Reconnaissance Report Prepared by: U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Denver Service Center June 2010 Acronyms BLM Bureau of Land Management NPS National Park Service SBCM San Bernardino County Museum Much of the background data for this report has been taken from the Bureau of Land Management's Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Upper Las Vegas Wash Conservation Transfer Area Las Vegas, Nevada, which was prepared in January 2010. This report has been prepared at the request of Senator Harry Reid and Representatives Shelley Berkley and Dina Titus to explore specific resources and advise on whether these resources merit further consideration as a potential new national park system unit. Publication and transmittal of this report should not be considered an endorsement or a commitment by the National Park Service to seek or support specific legislative authorization for the project or its implementation. This report was prepared by the U. S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Denver Service Center. Table of Contents 1 SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................... 1 2 BACKGROUND......................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Background of the
    [Show full text]
  • Globemallows
    RANGELANDS15(3), June 1993 127 Globemallows Bruce M. Pendery and Melvin D. Rumbaugh We initiated research on the ecological and forage ona, New Mexico, and Texas have the most species. characteristicsof globemallows(Sphaeralcea) in 1986 Sphaeralcea coccinea is the most widely distributed during a search for beneficialforbs that are well adapted species. to cold desertand steppe rangelands receivingless than Generally, globemallowspecies in the U.S. are peren- 12 inches of precipitation annually. Globemallows are nial, cool-season forbs or half-shrubs (Shaw andMonsen well adapted to such stressful environments. They also 1983, Pendery and Rumbaugh 1986). Most have showy are native species, which may be desired or required in orangeflowers borneon multiple stems that arise from a some situations. basalcrown. However, S. coccinea is moreprostrate and spreadsby rhizomes. In the western U.S. globemallows Characteristics and Ecology grow best in open or disturbed sites (especially road- Globemallows (see cover photos)are in the family Mal- sides) on sandy- to clay-loamsoils, or on gravelly foot- vaceae,which includes species such as cotton, okra, and hills receivingabout 8 to 12 inches of precipitationannu- hollyhock. Sphaeralcea occurs primarily in North and ally (Wasser 1982). Sphaeralcea grossulariifoliais found South America (Kearney 1935). There are 25 globemal- on alkaline soils and tolerates moderate salinity, but it low species on western U.S. rangelands (Table 1). Ariz- does not tolerate sodic soils. Recentwork hasshed lighton globemallowlife-history This article is a cooperativeinvestigation of the USDA-ARS and the Utah Agricultural ExperimentStation, Logan,Utah. Journal PaperNo. 4384. strategies,which may improveour management abilities. Authors are range scientist and retired Research Geneticist, respectively, Under natural conditions establish USDA,Agricultural Research Service, Logan.Utah 84322-6300.
    [Show full text]
  • Tule Springs Fossil Beds National Monument National Monument
    National Park Service Tule Springs Fossil Beds U.S. Department of the Interior Tule Springs Fossil Beds National Monument National Monument Park Assets Size 22,650 acres Economic Impact Not yet measured Annual Visitation Not yet counted Tule Springs Fossil Beds National Monument was established as the 405th Park Infrastructure unit of the National Park Service Dec. 19, 2014. Scientific investigations of No park facilities the area began in the early 1900s, culminating in the 1962-63 Tule Springs expedition. A long scientific hiatus ended with exhaustive paleontological Natural Resources excavations in the 2000s. These scientific excavations and findings have • The geologic deposits in the park go back shown that the park contains the single largest and most diverse open- at least 300,000 years. Paleontologists have site assemblage of vertebrate fossils from the end of the Pleistocene discovered megafauna fossils dating between epoch found in the Mojave Desert and the southern Great Basin. While 100,000 to 13,000 years ago. Extinct large there are no facilities or marked trails at the park, at this time, there are mammals that once inhabited the area opportunities to explore more of the story and see some of the fossils. include the North American lion, Columbian The National Park Service has an exhibit on display at the Nevada State mammoth, saber-toothed cat, dire wolf, horse, Museum in Las Vegas. bison and camel and the giant ground sloth. Smaller animals, such as squirrel, marmot, vole Park Purpose and gopher have been found, along with birds The purpose of Tule Springs Fossil Beds National Monument is to conserve, like the extinct teratorn, hawk, duck and owl.
    [Show full text]
  • The Desert Sage OUR 77Th SEASON MAY–JUNE 2018 ISSUE NO
    The Desert Sage OUR 77th SEASON MAY–JUNE 2018 ISSUE NO. 375 http://desertpeaks.org/ In this issue: Chair’s Corner Chair’s Corner Page 2 by Tina Bowman DPS Leadership Page 3 DPS Trips and Events Pages 4-7 Bob Michael’s pro- DPS Election Results Page 7 posal for adding DPS Banquet Flyer Pages 8-9 peaks to the DPS list Outings Chair Page 10 to bring the number Treasurer’s Report Page 10 up to one hundred is DPS List Update Page 10 a good one. So how Membership Report Page 11 do we add peaks? Conservation Chair Page 12 Here are some high- Letter to the Editor Page 12 lights of the process. Passages Page 13 Any member can Trip Reports: propose an addition Corkscrew Peak Page 14 or deletion in writing Smith Mtn. and Stewart Point Pages 14-15 to the Mountaineer- Pyramid Peak Pages 15-16 ing Committee, Mojave Desert Pages 16-17 chaired by the vice chair. Any proposed peak addi- Desert Books Pages 18-21 tion must be scheduled and climbed on a DPS- Great Basin Peaks Section News Page 21 sponsored outing and reported in the Sage before DPS Merchandise Page 22 the ballot appears, and there should be time for pro Sierra Club Membership Application Page 23 and con arguments in several issues of the Sage be- DPS Membership Application Page 23 fore the ballot is sent to members. A majority vote DPS Info Page 24 approves the listing (or delisting) of the peak. The bylaws give the full process here: THE NEXT SAGE SUBMISSION DEADLINE IS JUNE 10, 2018 http://desertpeaks.org/adobepdffiles/ The Desert Sage is published six times a year by bylawsmarch2012.pdf.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology and Paleontology of Tule Springs Fossil Beds National Monument, Nevada
    The Geology and Paleontology of Tule Springs Fossil Beds National Monument, Nevada On December 19, 2014, Tule Springs Fossil Beds National Monument in Nevada was established by Congress as the 405th unit of the National Park Service to “conserve, protect, interpret, and enhance for the benefit of present and future generations the unique and nationally important paleontological, scientific, educational, and recreational resources and values of the land” (P.L. 113-291, sec. 3092). Photograph by Eric Scott, Cogstone Resource Management, Inc., used with permission. The upper Las Vegas Wash cuts through sediments formed by ancient springs and marshes that blanketed the Las Vegas Valley floor during the Pleistocene Epoch. These deposits have yielded thousands of vertebrate fossils and contain valuable information on past climatic and environmental conditions. This is Tule Springs Fossil Beds National Monument. A Brief History of Tule Springs techniques with massive earth-moving animals (Haynes, 1967). Consequently, activities. Heavy construction equipment the hypothesis that early humans coexisted Vertebrate fossils have been known carved enormous trenches into the sedi- with Pleistocene megafauna at Tule from the Las Vegas Valley for more than ments at Tule Springs to expose vertical Springs was disproven, and interest in the a century, beginning in 1903 when Josiah walls as deep as 13 meters (nearly site faded. A long intermission in scientific Spurr of the U.S. Geological Survey 43 feet!), which allowed the sediments to research followed, lasting until the 2000s reported teeth and bones in the sedi- be studied in detail. Geologist C. Vance when museum scientists conducted com- ments exposed in the wash between Corn Haynes, Jr., directed the geological inves- prehensive and systematic paleontological Creek Springs and Tule Springs (Spurr, tigations and subdivided the fossil-rich excavations of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Gardening for Native Bees in Utah and Beyond James H
    Published by Utah State University Extension and Utah Plant Pest Diagnostic Laboratory ENT-133-09 January 2013 Gardening for Native Bees in Utah and Beyond James H. Cane Linda Kervin Research Entomologist, USDA ARS Logan, UT Pollinating Insect-Biology, Management, Systematics Research Do You Know? • 900 species of native bees reside in Utah. • Some wild bees are superb pollinators of Utah’s tree fruits, raspberries, squashes, melons and cucumbers. • Few of our native bees have much venom or any inclination to sting. • Our native bees use hundreds of varieties of garden flowers, many of them water-wise. • A garden plant need not be native to attract and feed native bees. tah is home to more than 20 percent Uof the 4,000+ named species of wild Fig. 1. Carder bee (Anthidium) foraging at lavender (Lavendula: Lamiaceae).1 bees that are native to North America. Except for bumblebees and some sweat bees, our native bees are solitary, not so- cial, many with just one annual generation that coincides with bloom by their favorite floral hosts. In contrast, the familiar honey- bee is highly social, has perennial colonies, and was brought to North America by settlers from Europe. Regardless of these differences, however, all of our bees need pollen and nectar from flowers. The sugars in sweet nectar power their flight; mother bees also imbibe some nectar to mix with pollen that they gather. Pollen is fortified with proteins, oils and minerals that are es- sential for the diets of their grub-like larvae back at the nest. Our flower gardens can become valuable cafeterias for local populations of diverse native bees.
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada State Museum Anthropological Papers No
    NEVADA STATE MUSEUM ANTHROPOLOGICAL PAPERS NO. 13 PART 3 POLLEN ANALYSIS OF THE YULE SPRINGS AREA, NEVADA by PETER J. MEHRINGER, JR. GEOCHRONOLOGY LABORATORIES UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA TUCSON, ARIZONA Carson City, Nevada October, 1967 • TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION . • • • • • • 132 POLLEN ANALYSIS AND SOUTHWESTERN ARCHAEOLOGY 132 COLLECTION OF POLLEN SAMPLES . 135 EXTRACTION OF POLLEN . • • 136 INTERPRETING THE FOSSIL POLLEN RECORD . 138 THE STUDY AREA . 146 VEGETATION AND MODERN POLLEN SAMPLES. 149 THE FOSSIL POLLEN RECORD • 169 DISCUSSION. 186 A PLEISTOCENE (WISCONSIN) CORRIDOR IN THE EASTERN MOHAVE DESERT . 189 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS. 193 REFERENCES CITED . 194 ILLUSTRATIONS Color Plate. Pleistocene pollen from the Las Vegas Valley, Nevada. (ca. 640x) . Facing 129 Figure 1. Photomicrographs of pollen from human coprolites . 133 2. Panamint Mountains modern pollen surface samples . 140 3. Modern pollen surface samples, Tule Springs and Corn Creek Sites 142 4. Lehner Ranch Arroyo. Pollen Profiles II, VII . 145 5. Map of Study Area. 147 6. View of the Tule Springs Area . 148 7. Pollen diagram of major pollen types from Kyle Canyon, Charleston Mountains . 151 8. Soil surface sample, Locality 25 . 153 9. Modern spring sample, Locality 28 153 10. View from the Tule Springs Site . 153 11. Modern surface sample, Locality 1, Kyle Canyon . 153 12. Modern sample, Locality 27, at Corn Creek Spring . 154 13. Modern surface sample, Locality 5, on Kyle Canyon Fan . 156 14. Vegetation between modern surface sample, Localities 9 and 10 in Kyle Canyon . 156 15. Modern surface sample, Locality 12, in Kyle . 156 16. Modern surface sample, Locality 15, in Kyle Canyon . 156 17.
    [Show full text]