Limenitis Camilla (Linnaeus, 1764) Limenitinae Le Petit Sylvain

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Limenitis Camilla (Linnaeus, 1764) Limenitinae Le Petit Sylvain Famille Nymphalidae Sous-famille Limenitis camilla (Linnaeus, 1764) Limenitinae le Petit Sylvain Statut Ce papillon est encore commun en Bourgogne et en Franche-Comté, avec des densités cependant bien moindres que dans les années 1980. RE UGAN CR Denis J EN VU NT LC Bourgogne Franche-Comté DD NA NE Europe – LC France – LC Mâle (Haute-Saône, 2011). Écologie et biologie postérieures. Les franges, blanches, sont Atteintes et menaces entrecoupées de brun au niveau des ner- Le Petit Sylvain est une espèce mé- La monoculture résineuse, la cir- vures. En vol, le risque de confusion avec sophile, affectionnant les milieux relati- culation automobile et l’entretien trop Limenitis reducta est réel. Ce dernier est vement frais et boisés : lisières, allées et systématique des lisières et des allées plus foncé, pourvu d’un éclat métallique clairières des forêts humides en vallées forestières ne sont certainement pas bleuté, et présente un gros point blanc alluviales, mais aussi chênaies pubes- les seules causes de sa raréfaction. Il dans la cellule des antérieures. Au repos, centes sur plateaux calcaires. Sa pré- convient d’ajouter le broyage des sous- la différence est évidente. sence requiert une structure forestière bois qui détruit toutes les essences non offrant des espaces suffi samment déga- Distribution productives, y compris les Chèvrefeuilles gés et ensoleillés où il peut se chauffer nourriciers, et les infl uences du change- ailes ouvertes et descendre au sol pour Espèce eurasiatique encore bien ment climatique, notamment dans les se désaltérer. Par certaines journées répandue et commune en France, sauf forêts les plus xérothermiques. chaudes, de nombreux individus peuvent dans quelques départements de la ré- Difficulté de se rassembler dans un rayon de soleil, gion méditerranéenne. Orientations de gestion et détermination autour d’une fl aque ou de déjections ani- En Franche-Comté, le Petit Sylvain mesures conservatoires males. Son vol est typiquement plané, est encore abondant dans la plupart des Afi n de garantir la pérennité des aussi bien au ras du sol qu’à la cime des stations fraîches et forestières de Haute- populations sur les secteurs boisés feuillus. Les adultes butinent volontiers Saône et du Territoire de Belfort. Il est favorables, il importe par exemple de les Ronces, les Berces et les Eupatoires. cependant en déclin dans nombre de renoncer au goudronnage des allées stations boisées plus xérothermiques du La chenille vit sur le Chèvrefeuille forestières et d’y appliquer une fauche Jura. des haies (ou Camérisier à balais, Loni- tardive. cera xylosteum) et sur le Chèvrefeuille Même constat en Bourgogne, où des bois (L. periclymenum), rongeant l’espèce commence à régresser sur les la feuille à partir de la pointe tout en en plateaux calcaires de l’Yonne et de la respectant la nervure principale. Comme Côte-d’Or. celles de tous les Sylvains, elle confec- tionne au deuxième stade une loge dans Phénologie une feuille enroulée (hibernarium) qui Espèce univoltine, paraissant en lui permet de passer l’hiver jusqu’à la une longue génération s’étendant de la Diagramme feuillaison. mi-juin à la fi n juillet. Quelques émer- écologique gences très tardives après la mi-août Description et risques de (souvent des femelles) peuvent laisser 4 Chaud 3 confusion envisager l’existence d’une deuxième 2 Limenitis camilla présente un des- génération partielle. 1 sus brun sombre, presque noir chez les Dates extrêmes : 17 mai – 16 sep- Humide Sec individus fraîchement éclos, et traversé tembre (9 octobre 2006 !). par une large bande blanche. Le revers, brun roussâtre, est orné des mêmes des- Froid sins que sur le dessus, et porte deux ran- gées de points noirs antémarginaux aux 320 Rev. sci. Bourgogne-Nature - Hors-série 13-2013 UGAN ARADAN Denis J Jean-François M Chenille sur Lonicera xylosteum (Doubs, 2010). ARADAN Jean-François M Accouplement, mâle en bas (Haute-Saône, 2009). Chrysalide (Doubs, 2010). 240 9000 n = 1361 ARADAN 220 7500 OINOT 200 180 6000 Claude V 160 Jean-François M 140 120 4500 100 80 3000 60 40 1500 20 Hibernarium (Côte-d’Or, 2010). Imago (Doubs, 2009). 0 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152 Janv. Févr. Mars Avr. Mai Juin Juil. Août Sept. Oct. Nov. Déc. Phénologie de Limenitis camilla. avant 1970 1970 - 1999 2000 - 2011 Distribution de Limenitis camilla en Bourgogne et Franche-Comté. Atlas des papillons de jour de Bourgogne et de Franche-Comté (Rhopalocères et Zygènes) 321.
Recommended publications
  • Shapwick Heath National Nature Reserve (NNR) Management Plan
    Shapwick Heath National Nature Reserve (NNR) Management Plan 2018 - 2023 Site Description 1: Description 1.1: Location Notes Location Shapwick Heath NNR lies 12 km from M5 Junction 23 between the villages of Westhay and Shapwick. Its central entrance lies on Shapwick Road, which intersects the site, approx. 7 km west of the town of Glastonbury. County Somerset District Sedgemoor and Mendip District Councils Local Planning Somerset County Council: Authority Sedgemoor District Council and Mendip District Council National Grid ST430403 Centre of site Reference See Appenix 1: Map 1 Avalon Marshes 1.2: Land Tenure Area Notes (ha) Total Area of NNR 530.40 Freehold 421.93 Declared an NNR in 1961 and acquired in stages: 1964/ 1984/ 1995 / 2006. Leasehold 108.47 Leased from Wessex Water plc S 35 Agreement S16 Agreement Other Agreements 137.81 A 10 year grazing licence with Mrs E R Whitcombe is in place until 30th April 2021. This includes use of farm buildings and infrastructure. This land is also subject to a Higher Level Stewardship agreement expiring on the same date. Legal rights of See Map 2 – Shapwick Heath NNR Landholdings access Access rights granted to Natural England by the Environment Agency Other rights, Natural England own access, mineral, sporting and covenants, etc. timber rights over all freehold land Notes Copies of leases and conveyances are held at 14-16 The Crescent Taunton TA1 4EB See Appendix 2: Map 2 Shapwick Heath NNR Landholdings 1.3: Site Status Designation Area Date Notes (ha) Special Area of Conservation (SAC) Special Designation: 1995 Part of the Somerset Levels & protection Area Moors SPA (SPA) Ramsar Designation: 1995 Part of the Somerset Levels & Moors Ramsar site NNR 452.4 Declarations: NNR and SSSI boundaries are No.1 1961 similar but not the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Poleward Shifts in Geographical Ranges of Butterfly Species Associated with Regional Warming
    letters to nature between 270 and 4,000 ms after target onset) and to ignore changes in the distractor. Failure to respond within a reaction-time window, responding to a change in the distractor or deviating the gaze (monitored with a scleral search Poleward shifts in coil) by more than 1Њ from the fixation point caused the trial to be aborted without reward. The change in the target and distractors was selected so as to geographical ranges of be challenging for the animal. In experiments 1 and 2 the animal correctly completed, on average, 79% of the trials, broke fixation in 11%, might have butterfly species associated responded to the distractor stimulus in 6% and responded too early or not at all in 5% of the trials. In Experiment 3 the corresponding values are 78, 13%, 8% with regional warming and 2%. In none of the three experiments was there a difference between the Camille Parmesan*†, Nils Ryrholm‡, Constantı´ Stefanescu§, performances for the two possible targets. Differences between average eye Jane K. Hillk, Chris D. Thomas¶, Henri Descimon#, positions during trials where one or the other stimulus was the target were Brian Huntleyk, Lauri Kaila!, Jaakko Kullberg!, very small, with only an average shift of 0.02Њ in the direction of the shift of Toomas Tammaru**, W. John Tennent††, position between the stimuli. Only correctly completed trials were considered. Jeremy A. Thomas‡‡ & Martin Warren§§ Firing rates were determined by computing the average neuronal response * National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, 735 State Street, across trials for 1,000 ms starting 200 ms after the beginning of the target Suite 300, Santa Barbara, California 93101, USA stimulus movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    BULGARIA Nick Greatorex-Davies. European Butterflies Group Contact ([email protected]) Local Contact Prof. Stoyan Beshkov. ([email protected]) National Museum of Natural History (NMNH), Sofia, Butterfly Conservation Europe Partner Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Stanislav Abadjiev compiled and collated butterfly records for the whole of Bulgaria and published a Local Recording Scheme distribution atlas in 2001 (see below). Records are still being gathered and can be sent to Stoyan Beshkov at NMNH, Sofia. Butterfly List See Butterflies of Bulgaria website (Details below) Introduction Bulgaria is situated in eastern Europe with its eastern border running along the Black Sea coast. It is separated from Romania for much of its northern border by the River Danube. It shares its western border with Serbia and Macedonia, and its southern border with Greece and Turkey. Bulgaria has a land area of almost 111,000 sq km (smaller than England but bigger than Scotland) and a declining human population of 7.15 million (as of 2015), 1.5 million of which live in the capital city, Sofia. It is very varied in both climate, topography and habitats. Substantial parts of the country are mountainous, particularly in the west, south-west and central ‘spine’ of the country and has the highest mountain in the Balkan Mountains (Musala peak in the Rila Mountains, 2925m) (Map 1). Almost 70% of the land area is above 200m and over 27% above 600m. About 40% of the country is forested and this is likely to increase through natural regeneration due to the abandonment of agricultural land. Following nearly 500 years under the rule of the Ottoman Empire, Bulgaria was independent for just a few years from 1908 before coming under the domination of the soviet communist regime in 1946.
    [Show full text]
  • Interspecific Variation in Competitor Avoidance and Foraging Success in Sap-Attracted Insects
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270496969 Interspecific variation in competitor avoidance and foraging success in sap- attracted insects Article in European Journal of Entomology · November 2009 DOI: 10.14411/eje.2009.066 CITATIONS READS 0 10 1 author: Jiichiro Yoshimoto University of the Valley of Guatemala 12 PUBLICATIONS 58 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Climate change effects on the biodiversity of the seasonally dry tropical forests of Motagua Valley in Guatemala View project All content following this page was uploaded by Jiichiro Yoshimoto on 28 January 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Eur. J. Entomol. 106: 529–533, 2009 http://www.eje.cz/scripts/viewabstract.php?abstract=1484 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Interspecific variation in competitor avoidance and foraging success in sap-attracted insects JIICHIRO YOSHIMOTO* Laboratory of Insect Ecology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa Oiwake-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan Key words. Aggressive interactions, community, foraging strategy, interference competition, resources, tree sap Abstract. Many insect species attracted to fermenting sap often fight for access to this resource, which results in the establishment of interspecific dominance hierarchies. In one such system, the hornet Vespa mandarinia (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) behaviourally dominates during the daytime and several subordinate species avoid aggressive interactions in various ways. In order to elucidate the interspecific variation in competitor-avoidance behaviour and its subsequent effect on foraging success, the behaviour of species of hornets, beetles and butterflies at patches (exudation spots) in Japan was recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Crossref Molecular systematics of the subfamily Limenitidinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) Bidur Dhungel1 and Niklas Wahlberg2 1 Southwestern Centre for Research and PhD Studies, Kathmandu, Nepal 2 Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden ABSTRACT We studied the systematics of the subfamily Limenitidinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphal- idae) using molecular methods to reconstruct a robust phylogenetic hypothesis. The molecular data matrix comprised 205 Limenitidinae species, four outgroups, and 11,327 aligned nucleotide sites using up to 18 genes per species of which seven genes (CycY, Exp1, Nex9, PolII, ProSup, PSb and UDPG6DH) have not previously been used in phylogenetic studies. We recovered the monophyly of the subfamily Limenitidinae and seven higher clades corresponding to four traditional tribes Parthenini, Adoliadini, Neptini, Limenitidini as well as three additional independent lineages. One contains the genera Harma C Cymothoe and likely a third, Bhagadatta, and the other two indepen- dent lineages lead to Pseudoneptis and to Pseudacraea. These independent lineages are circumscribed as new tribes. Parthenini was recovered as sister to rest of Limenitidinae, but the relationships of the remaining six lineages were ambiguous. A number of genera were found to be non-monophyletic, with Pantoporia, Euthalia, Athyma, and Parasarpa being polyphyletic, whereas Limenitis, Neptis, Bebearia, Euryphura, and Adelpha were paraphyletic. Subjects Biodiversity, Entomology, Taxonomy Keywords Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Systematics, New tribe, Classification, Limenitidinae Submitted 22 November 2017 Accepted 11 January 2018 Published 2 February 2018 INTRODUCTION Corresponding author Niklas Wahlberg, The butterfly family Nymphalidae has been the subject of intensive research in many fields [email protected] of biology over the decades.
    [Show full text]
  • The List of the 236 Butterflies of Greece
    (THE RED BOOK OF THREATENED ANIMAL IN GREECE) ΛΕΓΑΚΙΣ, ΑΝΑΣΤΑΣΙΟΣ: Ασπόνδυλα. In: ΛΕΓΑΚΙΣ Α. και Π. Μαραγκού (επιμέλεια έκδοσης), Το κόκκινο 67/1981 βιβλίο των απειλούμενων Ζώων ΠΔ : : της Ελλάδας. Ελληνική Ζωωλογική Εταιρεία. Αθήνα 2009 ΟΝΟΜΑ ΕΙΔΟΥΣ NAME OF SPECIES NUMA, C., et al (2016). The status and distributionbutterflies.IUCN, Malaga, of MediterraneanSpain. + x 32 pp. GREECE IN LAW THE CITES II Appendix CONVENTION BERNE 92/43HABITATS DIRECTIVE II ANNEX 92/43HABITATS DIRECTIVE IV ANNEX Red List status Europe (2010) of List Red European Butterflies EU27 (2010) 1 Iphiclides podalirius (Linnaeus, 1758) 2 Papilio machaon Linnaeus, 1758 3 Papilio alexanor Esper, 1800 * * * 4 Zerynthia polyxena ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775) * * * 5 Zerynthia cerisy (Godart, [1824]) * NT NT 6 Zerynthia cretica (Rebel, 1904) * 7 Archon apollinus (Herbst, 1798) * NT LC 8 Parnassius apollo (Linnaeus, 1758) * * * * NT NT 9 Parnassius mnemosyne (Linnaeus, 1758) * * * NT LC 10 Aporia crataegi (Linnaeus, 1758) 11 Pieris brassicae (Linnaeus, 1758) 12 Pieris rapae (Linnaeus, 1758) 13 Pieris mannii (Mayer, 1851) 14 Pieris ergane (Geyer, [1828]) * 15 Pieris napi (Linnaeus, 1758) 16 Pieris balcana Lorković, [1969] 17 Pieris krueperi Staudinger, 1860 * 18 Pontia edusa (Fabricius, 1777) 19 Pontia chloridice (Hübner, [1813]) B1ab(ii,iii)+2ab(ii,iii) EN * 20 Euchloe ausonia (Hübner, [1804]) 21 Euchloe penia (Freyer, 1851) 22 Anthocharis gruneri Herrich-Schäffer, 1851 * 23 Anthocharis cardamines (Linnaeus, 1758) 24 Anthocharis damone Boisduval, 1836 * 25 Colias crocea
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Planning in Epsom & Ewell
    Biodiversity and Planning in Epsom & Ewell Epsom & Ewell February 2012 Contents Contents 2 Section 1 -1a About this guidance 3 -1b Biodiversity in the planning process 4 -1c Information requirements 5 Section 2 -2a Internationally and nationally designated sites 6-8 -2b Legally protected species 9-11 Section 3 -3 Local sites and priority habitats and species 12 2 -3a Local sites 13-14 -3b Ancient woodland 15-16 -3c Priority habitats 17-19 -3d Priority species 20-21 -3e Other areas of importance to biodiversity 22-24 Section 4 -4a Biodiversity Opportunity Areas 25-27 -4b Green Infrastructure 28-30 -4c Biodiversity within developments 31 Section 5 -Key legislation and policy 32 Section 6 -Useful Contacts 33 Section 7 -Glossary 34 Section 8 -Acknowledgements 35 Appendix 1: Protected Species in Epsom & Ewell 36-39 Appendix 2: UK BAP species, local BAP habitat & designated sites in Epsom & Ewell 40-43 2 1a About this guidance Protecting Beauty, and Epsom enhancing & Ewell Epsom © & Ewell's biodiversity How to use this guidance Nick Turner The 1purpose About ofthis this guidance guidance is to assist Epsom & Ewell Borough This guidance has been arranged Council,Amethyst developers deceiver and ©residents Terry in ensuring that the Borough’s to align with national Planning Policy Statement 9: Biodiversity biodiversityLongley/seeing.org.uk is both protected and enhanced when new development take place. This guidance is linked to the Epsom & Ewell Local Biodiversity and Geological Conservation and ActionOtter Plan ©(EELBAP) Helen Walshand is an outcome of the EELBAP objectives. is divided into sections dealing Meadow pipit © Mike with various biodiversity features The BoroughTaylor/seeing.org.uk of Epsom & Ewell from the chalk grasslands of the Downs, which should be protected and enhanced through the planning through the ‘Ancient Woodland of Horton Country Park, to the many hectares of residential gardens provides a wide range of habitats that are system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genus Adelpha 231
    The Genus Adelpha 231 PLATE 1 (pp. 50-63). Figs. 32-38, a,c,e,g, dorsal surface; b,d,f,h, ventral surface. 32a,b: A. bredowii bredowii, Mexico; c,d: A. bredowii eulalia, USA; e,f: A. bredowii californica, USA. 33a,b: A. diocles diocles, Panama; c,d: A. diocles creton, Mexico. 34a,b: A. herbita, S.E. Brazil. 35a,b: A. zea, S.E. Brazil. 36a,b: A. paroeca paroeca, Mexico; c,d: A. paroeca paroeca, Panama. 37a,b: A. nea nea, E. Ecuador; c,d: A. nea sentia, Belize. 38a,b: A. paraena paraena, E. Ecuador; c,d: A. paraena lecromi, W. Colombia; e,f: A. paraena reyi, Venezuela; g,h: A. paraena massilia, Costa Rica. 232 The Genus Adelpha PLATE 2 (pp. 63-76). Figs. 39-41l, a,c,e,g,i,k, dorsal surface; b,d,f,h,j,l, ventral surface. 39a,b: A. radiata radiata, S.E. Brazil; c,d: A. radiata myrlea, S. E. Brazil; e,f: A. radiata explicator, E. Ecuador; g,h: A. radiata aiellae, W. Ecuador; i,j: A. radiata gilletella, French Guiana. 40a,b: A. serpa serpa, S.E. Brazil; c,d: A. serpa diadochus, Peru; e,f: A. serpa celerio, Guatemala; g,h: A. serpa duiliae, W. Ecuador. 41a,b: A. seriphia seriphia, no locality; c,d: A. seriphia pione, Venezuela; e,f: A. seriphia aquillia, E. Ecuador; g,h: A. seriphia godmani, Mexico; i,j: A. seriphia therasia, Bolivia; k,l: A. seriphia egregia, N. Colombia. The Genus Adelpha 233 PLATE 3 (pp. 76-78).
    [Show full text]
  • A Butterfly Expedition to Armenia
    Vol. 3 No. 2 1996 EMMEL et al: Armenian Expedition 37 HOLARCTIC LEPIDOPTERA, 3(2): 37-41 A BUTTERFLY EXPEDITION TO ARMENIA THOMAS C. EMMEL1, ANDREI SOURAKOV2, AND ALEXANDER DANTCHENKO3 'Dept. of Zoology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611; and 2Dept. of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA; 3Avangardnaia St. 11-160, ROS-125493, Moscow, Russia ABSTRACT.- The results of a June-July 1996 expedition to central Armenia are described. Immature stages of Limenitis reducta (Nymphalidae), Tomares romanovi (Lycaenidae) and Libythea celtis (Libytheidae) are illustrated, and a new food plant record is provided for Thaleropis jonia (Nymphalidae). A list of butterfly species (except skippers) found at Khosrov Nature Reserve is given. KEY WORDS: Apaturinae, Ascalaphidae, Azerbaijan, biodiversity, biogeography, Buprestidae, Caprifoliaceae, Caucasus, Central Asia, Cerambycidae, Coleoptera, Georgia, Hesperiidae, Leguminosae, Libytheidae, life history, Lycaenidae, Myrmeleontidae, Nemopteridae, Neuroptera, Noctuidae, Nymphalidae, Palearctic, Papilionidae, Pieridae, Russsia, Satyrinae, Soviet Union, Turkey, Ulmaceae, Umbelliferae. The Republic of Armenia is the smallest of the original 15 brought great improvement of the economic situation, so that life republics of the Soviet Union. Its area of 11,500 square miles in Armenia went almost back to normal. Problems with electricity (29,800 sq. km) covers the southern flanks of the Caucasus and fuel, when they occur, are usually temporary. Intensive Mountains. Armenia is bounded to the east and north by Azerbai- economic trade with Iran and Russia saturated markets with jan and Georgia, and to the west and southeast by Turkey and imported goods. For example, the purchasing of all supplies for Iran. The country is quite mountainous, with a wide range of the first two weeks of our 1996 expedition did not take more than habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2009 Tracking Changes in the Abundance of UK Butterflies
    ANNUAL REPORT 2009 Tracking changes in the abundance of UK butterflies ANNUAL REPORT 2009 Cover photograph of a Painted Lady, Vanessa cardui. One of the major highlights of 2009 was the mass immigration of Painted Ladies in Spring. Photograph by Alexander Henderson. The text, figures and pictures in this publication are the copyright of the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology and Butterfly Conservation unless otherwise stated and may not be reproduced without permission. This report should be cited as Botham, M.S., Brereton, T.M., Middlebrook, I., Cruickshanks, K.L., Zannese, A. & Roy, D.B. 2009. United Kingdom Butterfly Monitoring Scheme report for 2009. CEH Wallingford. REPORT CONTENTS The UKBMS I About the UKBMS 1 I UKBMS objectives 1 I Contacts 1 I Meet the team 2 BUTTERFLY ABUNDANCE IN 2009 I Survey methods 3 I Summary 3 I Species accounts 8 UKBMS NEWS I Future plans for the UKBMS 27 I A new red list of UK butterflies 27 I Current research using UKBMS data 28 FEATURES I Launching the Wider Countryside Butterfly Survey 29 I Painted Lady Migration 2009 32 I Spotlight on a local co-ordinator – Ken Orpe 35 CONTACT DETAILS FOR LOCAL CO-ORDINATORS 37 REFERENCES 40 APPENDICES I Appendix I: Trends in UK BAP status species 41 I Appendix II: Vernacular & scientific names of UK butterfly species 42 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS (back cover) UKBMS About the UKBMS I To encourage participation in scientific butterfly monitoring by supporting volunteer recording Welcome to the fifth report of the United Kingdom networks. Butterfly Monitoring Scheme (UKBMS). I To ensure a high level of quality assurance for Changes in the abundance of butterflies throughout the butterfly monitoring data by development and United Kingdom have been monitored chiefly using promotion of standards, and by applying rigorous transects since 1976.
    [Show full text]
  • EBG 23 May 2018 (PDF, 4.2Mb)
    Issue 23 May 2018 eNewsletter CONTENTS Welcome! We are now the European Butterflies Group and this is the first newsletter with our new name and logo. Chairman’s Introduction ....... 2 A big thank you as usual to contributors for their excellent articles. Notices and News.................... 3 Please do read the Chairman’s Introduction on the next page and AGM 2018 consider his appeal for volunteers. We badly need extra administra - Butterfly holidays tive support for the group to function effectively. If you think you Survey for Spanish Greenish Black-tip can help, please get in touch with the Chairman. You do NOT need Pointers on recent ‘splits’ to be expert in European butterflies to help run the group. 2019 EBG Calendar Competition News from France A year ago our Anniversary Magazine featured an updated checklist of European butterfly species, based on work by a committee Taxon nevadensis .................. 12 chaired by Rudi Verovnik. The list included 12 new species and I Corsica ................................... 15 have done some brief notes (on pages 4-6 ) which help to explain Charca de Suárez, Motril ......... 23 the changes. Bernard Watts has written a fuller article explaining Book Review............................ 28 the new species Melitaea nevadensis (Southern Heath Fritillary ) Photospot (FE Russia)............... 29 on pages 12-14. I would like to include articles in future newsletters on some of the other new species – for instance on the Erebia cassioides complex (see left). Contributions will Common Brassy Ringlet (Erebia be gratefully received, including sug - cassioides ), which I photographed gestions of accurate English names in the Italian Dolomites. E. cassioides is now considered to comprise three for the new species.
    [Show full text]
  • (Basilarchia) Arthemis Astyanax and L. (B.) Archippus in the Southeastern U.S
    Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 48(3). 1994. 190-198 CONTINUED INTERSPECIFIC HYBRIDIZATION BETWEEN LlMENITlS (BASILARCHIA) ARTHEMIS ASTYANAX AND L. (B.) ARCHIPPUS IN THE SOUTHEASTERN U.S. (NYMPHALIDAE) AUSTIN P. PLATT Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Catonsville, Maryland 21228, USA AND JAMES R. MAUDSLEY 400 University Circle, Athens, Georgia 30605, USA ABSTRACT. Interspecific hybridization between North American admiral butterflies is briefly reviewed and updated. Records of 77 wild male F, hybrids between the viceroy, Limenitis archippus :;ubspecies, and other nearctic Limenitis are noted. Among these are six new records of the hybrid form "rubidus" Strecker (L. archippus x L. arthemis astyanax), including three each from two localities, one in Athens, Georgia and the other in northern Florida. Four of these new hybrids were reared from eggs and larvae wild­ collected from willow~; (Salix spp.). Topics reviewed include 1) the present status of viceroy mimicry, and 2) the intense hybridization between phenotypically variable populations of L. archippus and L. arthemis astyanax observed recently in the Georgia/Florida region. Ecological, phenotypic, and behavioral reasons underlying this phenomenon are consid­ ered. Additional key words: admirals, L. archippus fioridensis, hybrid "rubidus," mimicry, selection. Interspecific hybridization among North American Limenitis is well­ known and has received much attention in the literature (see reviews by Platt et al. 1978, Platt 1983, Ritland 1990). Of particular interest to both lepidopterists and biologists are those crosses involving the viceroy, L. arc hippus (Cra.mer), a known mimic of various danaine models, and the other congeneric admirals with which L. archippus is broadly sym­ patric.
    [Show full text]