GEOMETRIC TRANSITIONS: from HYPERBOLIC to Ads GEOMETRY

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GEOMETRIC TRANSITIONS: from HYPERBOLIC to Ads GEOMETRY GEOMETRIC TRANSITIONS: FROM HYPERBOLIC TO AdS GEOMETRY A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Jeffrey Danciger June 2011 © 2011 by Jeffrey Edward Danciger. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/ww956ty2392 ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Steven Kerckhoff, Primary Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Gunnar Carlsson I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Maryam Mirzakhani Approved for the Stanford University Committee on Graduate Studies. Patricia J. Gumport, Vice Provost Graduate Education This signature page was generated electronically upon submission of this dissertation in electronic format. An original signed hard copy of the signature page is on file in University Archives. iii iv Abstract We introduce a geometric transition between two homogeneous three-dimensional geome- tries: hyperbolic geometry and anti de Sitter (AdS) geometry. Given a path of three- dimensional hyperbolic structures that collapse down onto a hyperbolic plane, we describe a method for constructing a natural continuation of this path into AdS structures. In particular, when hyperbolic cone manifolds collapse, the AdS manifolds generated on the \other side" of the transition have tachyon singularities. The method involves the study of a new transitional geometry called half-pipe geometry. We also discuss combinatorial/algebraic tools for constructing transitions using ideal tetrahedra. Using these tools we prove that transitions can always be constructed when the underlying manifold is a punctured torus bundle. v vi Preface This thesis focuses on connections between two particular types of geometry: hyperbolic ge- ometry and anti de Sitter (AdS) geometry. Though hyperbolic manifolds have been studied for over a century, it was Thurston's ground-breaking work starting in the late 1970s that established hyperbolic geometry as a vital tool for understanding three-manifolds. Today, with Perelman's proof of Thurston's Geometrization Conjecture, the study of hyperbolic manifolds is at the heart of the most important questions in low-dimensional topology. Anti de Sitter geometry is a Lorentzian analogue of hyperbolic geometry. Witten [Wit88] and others have studied such constant curvature Lorentzian spaces as simple models for 2 + 1 dimensional gravity. In the last ten years, AdS geometry has drawn much renewed interest due to its role in the most successful realizations of the holographic principle in string theory [Mal99]. Though historically the studies of hyperbolic geometry and anti de Sitter geometry have been somewhat disjoint, many parallels have appeared in recent years. One breakthrough along these lines is Mess's classification of maximal AdS space-times [Mes07, ABB+07] and its remarkable similarity to the Simultaneous Uniformization Theorem of Bers [Ber60] for quasi-Fuchsian hyperbolic manifolds. Stemming from Mess's work, results and questions in hyperbolic and AdS geometry have begun to appear in tandem, suggesting the existence of a deeper link between the two geometries. The search for such a link is one motivating force behind this research. The work presented here on geometric transitions establishes an explicit connection between three-dimensional hyperbolic and AdS geometry, strengthening the analogies de- scribed above. Many of the ideas are inspired by Craig Hodgson's study of degeneration and regeneration of hyperbolic structures [Hod86] and by the work of Joan Porti and col- laborators on regeneration of hyperbolic structures from various other geometric structures [Por98, HPS01, Por02, Por10]. vii viii Acknowledgements Over the last five years as a Ph.D. student, I was fortunate to benefit from the insight, advice, and encouragement of mentors, colleagues, and many dear friends. Without them, I am sure it would have been impossible to complete this thesis. First, I thank my advisor Steven Kerckhoff for abundant patience and generosity. I feel very fortunate to have worked with an advisor who was so involved with my research. With luck, I will leave Stanford having absorbed some small fraction of Steve's geometric intuition. I thank Gunnar Carlsson for many interesting conversations and general guidance during my graduate career. It was also a great pleasure discussing geometry with Maryam Mirzakhani; I wish she had arrived at Stanford sooner! I also thank the other members of my thesis committee, Joan Licata and Eva Silverstein. Some ideas in this thesis were influenced by conversations with Jean-Marc Schlenker, Joan Porti, Craig Hodgson, and many others at the Workshop on Geometry, Topology, and Dynamics of Character Varieties at the National University of Singapore in July 2010. The exceptional group of graduate students and postdocs at Stanford also deserve ac- knowledgement. I have greatly enjoyed discussing mathematics with Jason DeBlois and Kenji Kozai. I thank my dear friends Jesse Gell-Redman, for on-demand geometric analysis consultation, and Daniel Murphy, for emergency thesis formatting advice. My experience at Stanford has been greatly enhanced by the comradery of classmates Olena Bormashenko and J´osePerea as well as past and current office-mates David Ayala, Eric Malm, Dean Baskin, Henry Adams, and Chris Henderson. To my dearest Marika, your love is a stabilizing force in my life. Thank you for sup- porting me through the difficult times of the past five years. Also, your editing was clutch. Finally, I thank my family for endless love and support. Mom, your unfaltering devotion has lifted me beyond what I thought I was capable of. Dad, your passion, perseverance, and dedication inspire me in every endeavor; This thesis is dedicated to you. ix x Contents Abstract v Preface vii Acknowledgements ix 1 Introduction 1 3 3 1.1 Geometric transitions: from H to AdS ....................1 1.1.1 Cone/tachyon transitions . .3 1.2 Ideal triangulations . .4 1.2.1 Deformation Varieties . .5 1.2.2 Regeneration results . .5 1.2.3 Triangulated transitions and HP tetrahedra . .6 2 Geometric structures 7 2.1 (X; G) structures . .7 2.1.1 Deforming (X; G) structures . .9 2.1.2 Infinitesimal Deformations . 11 2.1.3 Projective Geometry . 12 2.2 Hyperbolic geometry . 12 2.2.1 The hyperboloid model . 13 2.2.2 The projective model . 14 2.2.3 n = 2: the upper half-plane model . 15 2.2.4 n = 3: the upper half-space model . 16 2.3 AdS geometry . 21 2.3.1 The hyperboloid model . 21 xi 2.3.2 The projective model . 22 2.3.3 n = 3: The PSL(2; R) model . 24 2.4 Transversely hyperbolic foliations . 29 3 Transition theory: half-pipe structures 33 n n n 3.1 H and AdS as domains in RP ........................ 34 3.2 Rescaling the degeneration - definition of HPn ................. 35 3.3 Example: singular torus . 37 3.4 The geometry of HPn .............................. 39 3.5 Collapsing and Rescaling . 44 3.6 Regeneration . 48 3.7 Transitions . 50 4 Singular three dimensional structures 51 4.1 Cone-like singularities on projective surfaces . 51 3 4.2 Cone-like singularities for RP structures . 54 3 4.3 Cone singularities in H ............................. 58 4.4 Tachyons in AdS3 ................................. 60 4.5 Infinitesimal cone singularities in HP3 ..................... 64 4.6 Deforming cone-like projective structures . 70 3 3 3 4.7 Regeneration of H and AdS structures from HP .............. 72 4.8 The PGL(2) description of isometry groups . 74 4.9 Proof of regeneration theorem . 79 4.10 Cone/Tachyon transitions . 81 4.11 Borromean Rings Example . 81 4.11.1 Representation variety . 82 4.11.2 Regenerating 3D structures . 83 4.11.3 An interesting flexibility phenomenon . 84 5 Ideal triangulations 87 5.1 General construction of ideal tetrahedra . 87 5.1.1 ideal tetrahedra . 89 5.1.2 shape parameters . 89 5.1.3 Glueing tetrahedra together . 93 xii 5.2 Triangulated geometric structures . 96 3 5.2.1 tetrahedra in H ............................. 96 5.2.2 Flattened tetrahedra and transversely hyperbolic foliations . 99 5.2.3 tetrahedra in AdS3 ............................ 101 5.2.4 Triangulated HP structures . 107 3 3 5.3 Regeneration of H and AdS structures . 108 5.4 Triangulated transitions . 110 5.4.1 Example: figure eight knot complement . 111 6 Punctured Torus Bundles 115 6.1 The monodromy triangulation . 115 6.2 The real deformation variety . 121 6.2.1 V+ is smooth of dimension one. 124 6.2.2 Positive tangent vectors . 127 6.2.3 V+ is non-empty . 129 6.2.4 A local parameter . 135 A A half-space model for AdS3 141 A.1 AdS3 via Clifford numbers . 141 A.2 The AdS metric . 144 A.3 Geodesics . 145 A.4 AdS ideal tetrahedra . 148 Bibliography 151 xiii xiv List of Figures 1.1 The transition from hyperbolic to spherical. .1 1.2 Fundamental domains for hyperbolic cone manifolds collapse onto a hyper- bolic plane. .2 2 1.3 Rescaling the hyperboloid model for H .....................3 2.1 A developing map is constructed via analytic continuation of the charts along paths. .8 2 2.2 Two ideal triangles in the upper half-plane model of H ............ 15 2.3 An ideal tetrahedron with one vertices 1; 0; 1; z in the upper half-space model 3 of H .......................................
Recommended publications
  • Models of 2-Dimensional Hyperbolic Space and Relations Among Them; Hyperbolic Length, Lines, and Distances
    Models of 2-dimensional hyperbolic space and relations among them; Hyperbolic length, lines, and distances Cheng Ka Long, Hui Kam Tong 1155109623, 1155109049 Course Teacher: Prof. Yi-Jen LEE Department of Mathematics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong MATH4900E Presentation 2, 5th October 2020 Outline Upper half-plane Model (Cheng) A Model for the Hyperbolic Plane The Riemann Sphere C Poincar´eDisc Model D (Hui) Basic properties of Poincar´eDisc Model Relation between D and other models Length and distance in the upper half-plane model (Cheng) Path integrals Distance in hyperbolic geometry Measurements in the Poincar´eDisc Model (Hui) M¨obiustransformations of D Hyperbolic length and distance in D Conclusion Boundary, Length, Orientation-preserving isometries, Geodesics and Angles Reference Upper half-plane model H Introduction to Upper half-plane model - continued Hyperbolic geometry Five Postulates of Hyperbolic geometry: 1. A straight line segment can be drawn joining any two points. 2. Any straight line segment can be extended indefinitely in a straight line. 3. A circle may be described with any given point as its center and any distance as its radius. 4. All right angles are congruent. 5. For any given line R and point P not on R, in the plane containing both line R and point P there are at least two distinct lines through P that do not intersect R. Some interesting facts about hyperbolic geometry 1. Rectangles don't exist in hyperbolic geometry. 2. In hyperbolic geometry, all triangles have angle sum < π 3. In hyperbolic geometry if two triangles are similar, they are congruent.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperbolic Geometry
    Hyperbolic Geometry David Gu Yau Mathematics Science Center Tsinghua University Computer Science Department Stony Brook University [email protected] September 12, 2020 David Gu (Stony Brook University) Computational Conformal Geometry September 12, 2020 1 / 65 Uniformization Figure: Closed surface uniformization. David Gu (Stony Brook University) Computational Conformal Geometry September 12, 2020 2 / 65 Hyperbolic Structure Fundamental Group Suppose (S; g) is a closed high genus surface g > 1. The fundamental group is π1(S; q), represented as −1 −1 −1 −1 π1(S; q) = a1; b1; a2; b2; ; ag ; bg a1b1a b ag bg a b : h ··· j 1 1 ··· g g i Universal Covering Space universal covering space of S is S~, the projection map is p : S~ S.A ! deck transformation is an automorphism of S~, ' : S~ S~, p ' = '. All the deck transformations form the Deck transformation! group◦ DeckS~. ' Deck(S~), choose a pointq ~ S~, andγ ~ S~ connectsq ~ and '(~q). The 2 2 ⊂ projection γ = p(~γ) is a loop on S, then we obtain an isomorphism: Deck(S~) π1(S; q);' [γ] ! 7! David Gu (Stony Brook University) Computational Conformal Geometry September 12, 2020 3 / 65 Hyperbolic Structure Uniformization The uniformization metric is ¯g = e2ug, such that the K¯ 1 everywhere. ≡ − 2 Then (S~; ¯g) can be isometrically embedded on the hyperbolic plane H . The On the hyperbolic plane, all the Deck transformations are isometric transformations, Deck(S~) becomes the so-called Fuchsian group, −1 −1 −1 −1 Fuchs(S) = α1; β1; α2; β2; ; αg ; βg α1β1α β αg βg α β : h ··· j 1 1 ··· g g i The Fuchsian group generators are global conformal invariants, and form the coordinates in Teichm¨ullerspace.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Ratio Dynamics on Ideal Polygons
    Cross-ratio dynamics on ideal polygons Maxim Arnold∗ Dmitry Fuchsy Ivan Izmestievz Serge Tabachnikovx Abstract Two ideal polygons, (p1; : : : ; pn) and (q1; : : : ; qn), in the hyperbolic plane or in hyperbolic space are said to be α-related if the cross-ratio [pi; pi+1; qi; qi+1] = α for all i (the vertices lie on the projective line, real or complex, respectively). For example, if α = 1, the respec- − tive sides of the two polygons are orthogonal. This relation extends to twisted ideal polygons, that is, polygons with monodromy, and it descends to the moduli space of M¨obius-equivalent polygons. We prove that this relation, which is, generically, a 2-2 map, is completely integrable in the sense of Liouville. We describe integrals and invari- ant Poisson structures, and show that these relations, with different values of the constants α, commute, in an appropriate sense. We inves- tigate the case of small-gons, describe the exceptional ideal polygons, that possess infinitely many α-related polygons, and study the ideal polygons that are α-related to themselves (with a cyclic shift of the indices). Contents 1 Introduction 3 ∗Department of Mathematics, University of Texas, 800 West Campbell Road, Richard- son, TX 75080; [email protected] yDepartment of Mathematics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616; [email protected] zDepartment of Mathematics, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Mus´ee 23, CH-1700 Fribourg; [email protected] xDepartment of Mathematics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; [email protected] 1 1.1 Motivation: iterations of evolutes . .3 1.2 Plan of the paper and main results .
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Euclidean Geometry
    Dr. Anna Felikson, Durham University Geometry, 26.02.2015 Outline 1 Euclidean geometry 1.1 Isometry group of Euclidean plane, Isom(E2). A distance on a space X is a function d : X × X ! R,(A; B) 7! d(A; B) for A; B 2 X satisfying 1. d(A; B) ≥ 0 (d(A; B) = 0 , A = B); 2. d(A; B) = d(B; A); 3. d(A; C) ≤ d(A; B) + d(B; C) (triangle inequality). We will use two models of Euclidean plane: p 2 2 a Cartesian plane: f(x; y) j x; y 2 Rg with the distance d(A1;A2) = (x1 − x2) + (y1 − y2) ; a Gaussian plane: fz j z 2 Cg, with the distance d(u; v) = ju − vj. Definition 1.1. A Euclidean isometry is a distance-preserving transformation of E2, i.e. a map f : E2 ! E2 satisfying d(f(A); f(B)) = d(A; B). Corollary 1.2. (a) Every isometry of E2 is a one-to-one map. (b) The composition of any two isometries is an isometry. (c) Isometries of E2 form a group (denoted Isom(E2)). Example 1.3: Translation, rotation, reflection in a line are isometries. Theorem 1.4. Let ABC and A0B0C0 be two congruent triangles. Then there exists a unique isometry sending A to A0, B to B0 and C to C0. Corollary 1.5. Every isometry of E2 is a composition of at most 3 reflections. (In particular, the group Isom(E2) is generated by reflections). Remark: the way to write an isometry as a composition of reflection is not unique.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperbolic Geometry on a Hyperboloid, the American Mathematical Monthly, 100:5, 442-455, DOI: 10.1080/00029890.1993.11990430
    William F. Reynolds (1993) Hyperbolic Geometry on a Hyperboloid, The American Mathematical Monthly, 100:5, 442-455, DOI: 10.1080/00029890.1993.11990430. (c) 1993 The American Mathematical Monthly 1985 Mathematics Subject Classification 51 M 10 HYPERBOLIC GEOMETRY ON A HYPERBOLOID William F. Reynolds Department of Mathematics, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155 E-mail: [email protected] 1. Introduction. Hardly anyone would maintain that it is better to begin to learn geography from flat maps than from a globe. But almost all introductions to hyperbolic non-Euclidean geometry, except [6], present plane models, such as the projective and conformal disk models, without even mentioning that there exists a model that has the same relation to plane models that a globe has to flat maps. This model, which is on one sheet of a hyperboloid of two sheets in Minkowski 3-space and which I shall call H2, is over a hundred years old; Killing and Poincar´eboth described it in the 1880's (see Section 14). It is used by differential geometers [29, p. 4] and physicists (see [21, pp. 724-725] and [23, p. 113]). Nevertheless it is not nearly so well known as it should be, probably because, like a globe, it requires three dimensions. The main advantages of this model are its naturalness and its symmetry. Being embeddable (distance function and all) in flat space-time, it is close to our picture of physical reality, and all its points are treated alike in this embedding. Once the strangeness of the Minkowski metric is accepted, it has the familiar geometry of a sphere in Euclidean 3-space E3 as a guide to definitions and arguments.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperbolic Geometry
    Flavors of Geometry MSRI Publications Volume 31,1997 Hyperbolic Geometry JAMES W. CANNON, WILLIAM J. FLOYD, RICHARD KENYON, AND WALTER R. PARRY Contents 1. Introduction 59 2. The Origins of Hyperbolic Geometry 60 3. Why Call it Hyperbolic Geometry? 63 4. Understanding the One-Dimensional Case 65 5. Generalizing to Higher Dimensions 67 6. Rudiments of Riemannian Geometry 68 7. Five Models of Hyperbolic Space 69 8. Stereographic Projection 72 9. Geodesics 77 10. Isometries and Distances in the Hyperboloid Model 80 11. The Space at Infinity 84 12. The Geometric Classification of Isometries 84 13. Curious Facts about Hyperbolic Space 86 14. The Sixth Model 95 15. Why Study Hyperbolic Geometry? 98 16. When Does a Manifold Have a Hyperbolic Structure? 103 17. How to Get Analytic Coordinates at Infinity? 106 References 108 Index 110 1. Introduction Hyperbolic geometry was created in the first half of the nineteenth century in the midst of attempts to understand Euclid’s axiomatic basis for geometry. It is one type of non-Euclidean geometry, that is, a geometry that discards one of Euclid’s axioms. Einstein and Minkowski found in non-Euclidean geometry a This work was supported in part by The Geometry Center, University of Minnesota, an STC funded by NSF, DOE, and Minnesota Technology, Inc., by the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute, and by NSF research grants. 59 60 J. W. CANNON, W. J. FLOYD, R. KENYON, AND W. R. PARRY geometric basis for the understanding of physical time and space. In the early part of the twentieth century every serious student of mathematics and physics studied non-Euclidean geometry.
    [Show full text]
  • A. Geodesics in the Hyperboloid Model B. Proof of Theorem 1 C
    Hyperbolic Entailment Cones A. Geodesics in the Hyperboloid Model One can sanity check that indeed the formula from theorem n n 1 satisfies the conditions: The hyperboloid model is (H ; h·; ·i1), where H := fx 2 n;1 R : hx; xi1 = −1; x0 > 0g. The hyperboloid model can be viewed from the extrinsically as embedded in the pseudo- • d (γ(0); γ(t)) = t; 8t 2 [0; 1] n;1 D Riemannian manifold Minkowski space (R ; h·; ·i1) and n;1 inducing its metric. The Minkowski metric tensor gR of signature (n; 1) has the components • γ(0) = x 2−1 0 ::: 03 n;1 6 0 1 ::: 07 gR = 6 7 4 0 0 ::: 05 • γ_ (0) = v 0 0 ::: 1 The associated inner-product is hx; yi1 := −x0y0 + • lim γ(t) := γ(1) 2 @ n Pn t!1 D i=1 xiyi. Note that the hyperboloid model is a Rieman- nian manifold because the quadratic form associated with gH is positive definite. C. Proof of Corollary 1.1 n Proof. Denote u = p 1 v. Using the notations from In the extrinsic view, the tangent space at H can be de- gD(v;v) n n;1 x scribed as TxH = fv 2 R : hv; xi1 = 0g. See Robbin p Thm.1, one has expx(v) = γx;u( gxD(v; v)). Using Eq.3 & Salamon(2011); Parkkonen(2013). and6, one derives the result. Geodesics of Hn are given by the following theorem (Eq D. Proof of Corollary 1.2 (6.4.10) in Robbin & Salamon(2011)): n n Proof.
    [Show full text]
  • Unifying the Hyperbolic and Spherical 2-Body Problem with Biquaternions
    Unifying the Hyperbolic and Spherical 2-Body Problem with Biquaternions Philip Arathoon December 2020 Abstract The 2-body problem on the sphere and hyperbolic space are both real forms of holo- morphic Hamiltonian systems defined on the complex sphere. This admits a natural description in terms of biquaternions and allows us to address questions concerning the hyperbolic system by complexifying it and treating it as the complexification of a spherical system. In this way, results for the 2-body problem on the sphere are readily translated to the hyperbolic case. For instance, we implement this idea to completely classify the relative equilibria for the 2-body problem on hyperbolic 3-space for a strictly attractive potential. Background and outline The case of the 2-body problem on the 3-sphere has recently been considered by the author in [1]. This treatment takes advantage of the fact that S3 is a group and that the action of SO(4) on S3 is generated by the left and right multiplication of S3 on itself. This allows for a reduction in stages, first reducing by the left multiplication, and then reducing an intermediate space by the residual right-action. An advantage of this reduction-by-stages is that it allows for a fairly straightforward derivation of the relative equilibria solutions: the relative equilibria may first be classified in the intermediate reduced space and then reconstructed on the original phase space. For the 2-body problem on hyperbolic space the same idea does not apply. Hyperbolic 3-space H3 cannot be endowed with an isometric group structure and the symmetry group SO(1; 3) does not arise as a direct product of two groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Organization on Riemannian Manifolds
    JOURNAL OF GEOMETRIC MECHANICS doi:10.3934/jgm.2019020 c American Institute of Mathematical Sciences Volume 11, Number 3, September 2019 pp. 397{426 SELF-ORGANIZATION ON RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS Razvan C. Fetecau∗ and Beril Zhang Department of Mathematics Simon Fraser University Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada (Communicated by Darryl D. Holm and Manuel de Le´on) Abstract. We consider an aggregation model that consists of an active trans- port equation for the macroscopic population density, where the velocity has a nonlocal functional dependence on the density, modelled via an interaction potential. We set up the model on general Riemannian manifolds and provide a framework for constructing interaction potentials which lead to equilibria that are constant on their supports. We consider such potentials for two specific cases (the two-dimensional sphere and the two-dimensional hyperbolic space) and investigate analytically and numerically the long-time behaviour and equi- librium solutions of the aggregation model on these manifolds. Equilibria ob- tained numerically with other interaction potentials and an application of the model to aggregation on the rotation group SO(3) are also presented. 1. Introduction. The literature on self-collective behaviour of autonomous agents (e.g., biological organisms, robots, nanoparticles, etc) has been growing very fast recently. One of the main interests of such research is to understand how swarm- ing and flocking behaviours emerge in groups with no leader or external coordina- tion. Such behaviours occur for instance in natural swarms, e.g., flocks of birds or schools of fish [14, 25]. Also, swarming and flocking of artificial mobile agents (e.g., robots) in the absence of a centralized coordination mechanism is of major interest in engineering [37, 38].
    [Show full text]
  • Harmonic Analysis on the Proper Velocity Gyrogroup ∗ 1 Introduction
    Harmonic Analysis on the Proper Velocity gyrogroup ∗ Milton Ferreira School of Technology and Management, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Portugal 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal. Email: [email protected] and Center for Research and Development in Mathematics and Applications (CIDMA), University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal. Email [email protected] Abstract In this paper we study harmonic analysis on the Proper Velocity (PV) gyrogroup using the gyrolanguage of analytic hyperbolic geometry. PV addition is the relativis- tic addition of proper velocities in special relativity and it is related with the hy- perboloid model of hyperbolic geometry. The generalized harmonic analysis depends on a complex parameter z and on the radius t of the hyperboloid and comprises the study of the generalized translation operator, the associated convolution operator, the generalized Laplace-Beltrami operator and its eigenfunctions, the generalized Poisson transform and its inverse, the generalized Helgason-Fourier transform, its inverse and Plancherel's Theorem. In the limit of large t; t ! +1; the generalized harmonic analysis on the hyperboloid tends to the standard Euclidean harmonic analysis on Rn; thus unifying hyperbolic and Euclidean harmonic analysis. Keywords: PV gyrogroup, Laplace Beltrami operator, Eigenfunctions, Generalized Helgason- Fourier transform, Plancherel's Theorem. 1 Introduction Harmonic analysis is the branch of mathematics that studies the representation of functions or signals as the superposition of basic waves called harmonics. It investigates and gen- eralizes the notions of Fourier series and Fourier transforms. In the past two centuries, it has become a vast subject with applications in diverse areas as signal processing, quantum mechanics, and neuroscience (see [18] for an overview).
    [Show full text]
  • MATH32052 Hyperbolic Geometry
    MATH32052 Hyperbolic Geometry Charles Walkden 12th January, 2019 MATH32052 Contents Contents 0 Preliminaries 3 1 Where we are going 6 2 Length and distance in hyperbolic geometry 13 3 Circles and lines, M¨obius transformations 18 4 M¨obius transformations and geodesics in H 23 5 More on the geodesics in H 26 6 The Poincar´edisc model 39 7 The Gauss-Bonnet Theorem 44 8 Hyperbolic triangles 52 9 Fixed points of M¨obius transformations 56 10 Classifying M¨obius transformations: conjugacy, trace, and applications to parabolic transformations 59 11 Classifying M¨obius transformations: hyperbolic and elliptic transforma- tions 62 12 Fuchsian groups 66 13 Fundamental domains 71 14 Dirichlet polygons: the construction 75 15 Dirichlet polygons: examples 79 16 Side-pairing transformations 84 17 Elliptic cycles 87 18 Generators and relations 92 19 Poincar´e’s Theorem: the case of no boundary vertices 97 20 Poincar´e’s Theorem: the case of boundary vertices 102 c The University of Manchester 1 MATH32052 Contents 21 The signature of a Fuchsian group 109 22 Existence of a Fuchsian group with a given signature 117 23 Where we could go next 123 24 All of the exercises 126 25 Solutions 138 c The University of Manchester 2 MATH32052 0. Preliminaries 0. Preliminaries 0.1 Contact details § The lecturer is Dr Charles Walkden, Room 2.241, Tel: 0161 27 55805, Email: [email protected]. My office hour is: WHEN?. If you want to see me at another time then please email me first to arrange a mutually convenient time. 0.2 Course structure § 0.2.1 MATH32052 § MATH32052 Hyperbolic Geoemtry is a 10 credit course.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms 300 North Zmb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 40106 a Xerox Education Company 73-11,544
    INFORMATION TO USERS This dissertation was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]