Using Games and Gamification to Create Personalized Instruction Karl M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Using Games and Gamification to Create Personalized Instruction Karl M Center on in Pantone7473c/7462c/7542c Thank you for downloading Choose Your Level: Using Games and Gamification to Create Personalized Instruction Karl M. Kapp from the Center on Innovations in Learning website www.centeril.org This report is in the public domain. While permission to reprint this publication is not necessary, it should be cited as: Kapp, K. M. (2016). Choose your level: Using games and gamification to create personalized instruction. In M. Murphy, S. Redding, & J. Twyman (Eds.), Handbook on personalized learning for states, districts, and schools (pp. 131–143). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University, Center on Innovations in Learning. Retrieved from www.centeril. org The Center is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education (OESE), under the comprehensive centers program, Award # S283B120052-12A. Choose Your Level: Using Games and Gamification to Create Personalized Instruction Karl M. Kapp Maria, an eighth-grade student, arrives to science class early, walks over to a cabinet, and chooses a tablet computer. She then sits down quietly and begins learning with the tablet. Other students slowly file in and do the same. Maria is learning about velocity as part of a unit introduced by her teacher last week. After Maria’s teacher introduced the concept of velocity and how it is calculated, he assigned a learning game to reinforce what he had taught, and that is what Maria and her classmates are engaged in now. Maria looks over and waves to her friend Juan who has just retrieved his tablet from the cabinet. Today, the first thing Maria does is choose a level. She is feeling smug but not super smart, so she decides to play Level 1 over again before proceeding to the newly unlocked and substantially more difficult Level 2. After quickly playing the first level of the game again and only having to start over once, losing only a couple of points, she proceeds to Level 2 and its terminal learning objective related to the calculation of veloc- ity. Of course, to Maria, it’s not a “terminal learning objective”; rather, it’s the next level of the ROV Commander game she’s been playing for the past few days (Figure 1). Figure 1. The ROV Commander Screenshot 131 Handbook on Personalized Learning In the game, she is the “commander” of a remotely operated vehicle (ROV). The ROV looks like a sphere with an antenna on top. Maria’s challenge is to maneuver the ROV through an obstacle course without running into anything. Her goals are to find a half dozen “hidden” waypoints and to accurately record information about distance, time, and rate and then make calculations based on the recorded information (see Figure 2). The waypoints aren’t really hidden, and if she records information and performs her calcula- tions properly, she can find them quickly. Maria maneuvers the ROV within the confines of the game’s landscape and then records data for each waypoint she locates. With the recorded data, the game can “check” to see that Maria is performing the velocity calcu- lations correctly. If she is not, the game provides corrective feedback, and Maria must recalculate the data for the waypoint. If she does hit an obstacle, the ROV loses speed and energy points. These are both undesirable outcomes to Maria, who is striving to be the first student in her class to get to Level 3 and win the game. If she loses speed, she can’t get to the next level as quickly; if she sustains too much damage, her ROV will need to start over. Maria has heard that Level 3 is “cool,” that the ROV uses boosters to fly. She wants to check that out, but first she will have to do some calculations. Unknown to Maria, but part of why her teacher has chosen ROV Commander as a learning game, is that each level introduces a new concept. This structure provides a scaffolded approach to content enabling Maria and her classmates to progress in both the knowledge and appli- cation of formulas for average velocity, final velocity, distance traveled, and acceleration. Finally, Maria completes her last calculation and finds the last waypoint. She is pleased and lets out a screech. As she reflects on finding this last waypoint, it occurs to her that Juan must have missed it. Otherwise, he wouldn’t be stuck driving around the ROV on Level 2, which is where he started today. Maria suspects it might be because he needs to spend some time calculating distances or travel time from one waypoint to another. Maria mentally makes a note to herself to give Juan a hint of where to look for the last way- point. But that will have to wait, because Maria wants to make it to Level 3 and win the game before Juan does. She is feeling confident that today is the day she’ll make it and win the game. Figure 2. Calculating Speed With Distance and Time 132 Choose Your Level: Using Games and Gamification For decades, educators have been forced to choose between providing each student with personalized instruction or covering required state or locally mandated content. In many cases, the need to cover required content trumped the idea of providing personal- ized learning for each student. Given those requirements and typical class sizes, it has been impossible to personalize curriculum delivery, pacing, and level of difficulty for each student. As Maria’s game-playing experience indicates, game-based learning provides several advantages over traditional teacher-led instruction—that is, lecture-based instruction with uniform content delivered to all the students at the same pace, with little time for student reflection or self-direction. Game-based learning, on the other hand, enables each student to have a personalized learning experience with the same content at his or her own pace. Students Game-based learning, on the can review content if they wish, speed ahead, other hand, enables each student to have a personalized learning experiment, and experience the game differently experience with the same content than fellow students and still reach the same at his or her own pace. learning outcomes. In addition to individual- ized pacing, games provide for a student to progress in different ways through the game, reviewing levels or content by replaying a level, and making new choices that impact the outcome of the game (Kapp, 2012). Games can instantly provide feedback and help when needed without the student raising his or her hand or interrupting the teacher who is help- ing another student. Well-designed game-based learning provides levels of personalization that “scaffold each student’s learning and foster self-direction to help each individual achieve mastery of knowledge and skills” (Redding, 2014, p. 6) Although a similar experience could be had in many classrooms with nondigital interventions, many constraints preclude the use of those interventions in achieving personalized learning. Aspects of nondigital strate- gies—such as paper-based programmed instruction and personalized tutoring by the teacher providing carefully scaffolded lessons based on each student’s past performance and rate of understanding—conflict with basic instructional limitations, including the available time and materials and maintaining good classroom management. Digital games, then, offer an ideal tool for delivering what the U.S. Department of Education defines as personalized learning, which is “instruction that is paced to learn- ing needs (i.e., individualized), tailored to learning preferences (i.e., differentiated), and tailored to the specific interests of different learners” (2010, p. 12). Games offer many of the elements of personalization as well as the ability to provide personalized instruction on a scalable level. A teacher can provide all 30 students in her classroom with a tablet, and each can then begin engaging in personalized learning (Guillén-Nieto & Aleson- Carbonell, 2012). Although all of these features of game-based learning reflect advantages associated with personalized learning, research comparing game-based learning with traditional classroom instruction has not consistently shown one method to be superior to the other. Game-based research for education is “vast but not conclusive” (Schifter, 2013, p. 149). Game-based research has been centered on comparison-based studies and discussions of which is better, traditional instruction or game-based learning (Kapp, 2013; Liao, 2010; Randel, Morris, Wetzel, & Whitehill, 1992; Sigurdardottir, 2012). There has not 133 Handbook on Personalized Learning been a conclusive answer to this question. In some studies, games have proven more effective than traditional teacher-led instruction, and, in some cases, they have not. The lack of a definite winner between games and traditional instruction has led to confusion about the effective use of games in the classroom among policymakers, administrators, teachers, and parents, who have little practical or actionable advice to guide them. It has even caused some to ask, “Are games effective for teaching at all?” (Clark, 2013). The answer to that question is a resounding “yes.” Evidence strongly supports the conclusion that games are capable of being effective and efficient tools for teaching—stu- dents can and do learn from games (Hays, 2005; Ke, 2009; Randel et al., 1992; Schifter, 2013; Sitzmann, 2011; Vogel et al., 2006; Wolfe, 1997; Wouters, van Nimwegen, van Oostendorp, & van der Spek, 2013). So the question should not be “Are games capable of teaching?” because they are. Instead, stakeholders should be asking several other questions: “What features of games lead to learning and when?” “What classroom conditions support using games?” “How should a game be integrated into the classroom to ensure positive learning outcomes?” To answer these questions, we need to delve into the rich history of game research and not look only at the comparison with other types of instruction but also review the studies which determine what elements were present in the game or classroom condition when the games led to positive learning outcomes.
Recommended publications
  • The Use of Minecraft to Foster Creativity, Collaboration And
    Cueva Carrión, Henry David The Use of Minecraft to Foster Creativity, Collaboration and Motivation through Game-Based Learning and Gamification Master’s Thesis FACULTY OF EDUCATION Learning, Education and Technology, Master’s Programme in Education October 2018 Acknowledgements Dedicated to my parents, siblings, Paloma and to my unborn daughter. University of Oulu Faculty of Education The use of Minecraft to Foster Creativity, Collaboration and Motivation through GBL and Gamification Henry David Cueva Carrión Master´s Thesis, 51 pages, 4 appendices October 2018 Abstract The eruption of ICTs in our society posed the question of how to integrate technology into education. According to Waks (1987) in Science, Technology and Society Education, we need to find a way to integrate educational approaches that embrace and intertwine education and technology. Then, through the use of pedagogical approaches such as Game-based Learning and gamification, Minecraft presents itself as the perfect tool to develop computational think- ing, foster creativity, nurture collaboration and increase motivation. The aim of my research is to demonstrate how motivation and collaboration can be fostered through the use of Minecraft in one activity called “Being an architect on Minecraft”. In order to do that, I use a quasi- experimental research. The participants were 18 in total, divided in 2 groups one experimental and one control. In the experimental group I use the implementation of Game-based Learning and gamification and in the other group, I use the traditional way of teaching. The results clearly stablish a positive effect in collaboration and a high level of motivation during the entire process.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Games As a Context for Children's Cognitive Development
    Volume 32, Number 1 | 2019 Social Policy Report Digital Games as a Context for Children’s Cognitive Development: Research Recommendations and Policy Considerations Fran C. Blumberg, Fordham University Kirby Deater-Deckard, University of Massachusetts-Amherst Sandra L. Calvert, Georgetown University Rachel M. Flynn, Northwestern University C. Shawn Green, University of Wisconsin-Madison David Arnold, University of Massachusetts-Amherst Patricia J. Brooks, College of Staten Island & The Graduate Center, CUNY ABSTRACT We document the need to examine digital game play and app use as a context for cognitive development, particularly during middle childhood. We highlight this developmental period as 6- through 12- year olds comprise a large swath of the preadult population that plays and uses these media forms. Surprisingly, this age range remains understudied with regard to the impact of their interactive media use as compared to young children and adolescents. This gap in knowledge about middle childhood may refect strong and widely held concerns about the effects of digital games and apps before and after this period. These concerns include concurrent and subsequent infuences of game use on very young children’s and adolescents’ cognitive and socioemotional functioning. We highlight here what is currently known about the impact of media on young children and adolescents and what is not known about this impact in middle childhood. We then offer recommendations for the types of research that developmental scientists can undertake to examine the effcacy of digital games within the rapidly changing media ecology in which children live. We conclude with a discussion of media policies that we believe can help children beneft from their media use.
    [Show full text]
  • Drivers and Barriers to Adopting Gamification: Teachers' Perspectives
    Drivers and Barriers to Adopting Gamification: Teachers’ Perspectives Antonio Sánchez-Mena1 and José Martí-Parreño*2 1HR Manager- Universidad Europea de Valencia, Valencia, Spain and Universidad Europea de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain 2Associate Professor - Universidad Europea de Valencia, Valencia, Spain [email protected] [email protected] Abstract: Gamification is the use of game design elements in non-game contexts and it is gaining momentum in a wide range of areas including education. Despite increasing academic research exploring the use of gamification in education little is known about teachers’ main drivers and barriers to using gamification in their courses. Using a phenomenology approach, 16 online structured interviews were conducted in order to explore the main drivers that encourage teachers serving in Higher Education institutions to using gamification in their courses. The main barriers that prevent teachers from using gamification were also analysed. Four main drivers (attention-motivation, entertainment, interactivity, and easiness to learn) and four main barriers (lack of resources, students’ apathy, subject fit, and classroom dynamics) were identified. Results suggest that teachers perceive the use of gamification both as beneficial but also as a potential risk for classroom atmosphere. Managerial recommendations for managers of Higher Education institutions, limitations of the study, and future research lines are also addressed. Keywords: gamification, games and learning, drivers, barriers, teachers, Higher Education. 1. Introduction Technological developments and teaching methodologies associated with them represent new opportunities in education but also a challenge for teachers of Higher Education institutions. Teachers must face questions regarding whether to implement new teaching methodologies in their courses based on their beliefs on expected outcomes, performance, costs, and benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaming, Gamification and BYOD in Academic and Library Settings: Bibliographic Overview Plamen Miltenoff St
    St. Cloud State University theRepository at St. Cloud State Library Faculty Publications Library Services 6-2015 Gaming, Gamification and BYOD in academic and library settings: bibliographic overview Plamen Miltenoff St. Cloud State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/lrs_facpubs Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation Miltenoff, Plamen, "Gaming, Gamification and BYOD in academic and library settings: bibliographic overview" (2015). Library Faculty Publications. 46. https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/lrs_facpubs/46 This Bibliographic Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Library Services at theRepository at St. Cloud State. It has been accepted for inclusion in Library Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of theRepository at St. Cloud State. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Plamen Miltenoff [email protected] Gaming, Gamification and BYOD in academic and library settings: bibliographic overview Keywords: gaming, gamification, game-based learning, GBL, serious games, Bring Your Own Device, BYOD, mobile devices, Millennials, Generation Y, Generation Z, academic libraries, education, assessment, badges, leaderboards Introduction Lev Vygotsky’s “Zone of proximal development” and his Sociocultural Theory opened new opportunities for interpretations of the learning process. Vygotsky’s ideas overlapped Jean Piaget’s and Erik Erickson’s assertions that cooperative learning, added to experimental learning, enhances the learning process. Peer interaction, according to them, is quintessential in accelerating the learning process (Piaget, 1970; Erickson, 1977; Vygotsky, 1978). Robert Gagné, B.F. Skinner, Albert Bandura, and others contributed and constructivism established itself as a valid theory in learning. Further, an excellent chapter of social learning theories is presented by Anderson, & Dron (2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Engaging Children with Educational Content Via Gamification Kalpana Nand1,4, Nilufar Baghaei1,2* , John Casey1, Bashar Barmada1, Farhad Mehdipour2 and Hai-Ning Liang3
    Nand et al. Smart Learning Environments (2019) 6:6 Smart Learning Environments https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0085-2 RESEARCH Open Access Engaging children with educational content via Gamification Kalpana Nand1,4, Nilufar Baghaei1,2* , John Casey1, Bashar Barmada1, Farhad Mehdipour2 and Hai-Ning Liang3 * Correspondence: nilufar.baghaei@ op.ac.nz Abstract 1Department of Computer Science, Unitec Institute of Technology, Gamification is the application of game mechanisms in non-gaming environments Auckland, New Zealand with the objective of enhancing user experience. In this paper, we investigate the 2Department of Information effectiveness of gamification in educational context, i.e. teaching numeracy at a Technology, Otago Polytechnic Auckland International Campus primary school level. We study the appealing characteristics of engaging computer (OPAIC), Auckland, New Zealand games from children’s point of view, and investigate whether embedding the Full list of author information is proposed characteristics into an educational tool enhances children’s learning. The available at the end of the article main characteristics we identify are levels of difficulties, feedback from the current level, and graphical presentation. They were then embedded into a Java-based open source programme based on “Who wants to be a millionaire” TV show, with the aim of teaching children numeracy (level 5 New Zealand curriculum). Two versions were created: feature enriched game (FEG) with all the features enabled and feature devoid game (FDG) with no extra features. We present the results of an evaluation study done with primary school children (n = 120) over a period of two weeks. The effectiveness of the educational tool was measured using a pre-test and a post-test, as well as other indicators such as the frequency and duration of interaction.
    [Show full text]
  • A Design Process for Balanced Educational Video Games with Collaborative Activities
    A design process for balanced educational video games with collaborative activities Natalia Padilla-Zea a,b, Nuria Medina-Medina a, Francisco L. Gutiérrez-Vela a, José R. López-Arcos a, Patricia Paderewski a & Carina S. González-González c a Dpto. Lenguajes y Sistemas Informáticos y CITYC, Universidad de Granada, Granada, España. {npadilla, nmedina, fgutierr, patricia, jrlarco}@ugr.es b Universidad Internacional de la Rioja, Logroño, España. [email protected] c Dpto. Ingeniería de Sistemas y Automática y Arquitectura y Tecnología de Computadores, Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Españ[email protected] Received: February 13th, 2015. Received in revised form: March 10th, 2015. Accepted: September 29th, 2015 Abstract The efficiency of educational video games could be improved through the use of a specific development method that allows them to keep both their educational and recreational goals and maintains their playability. Accordingly, we present a process for the incremental design of educational video games with collaborative activities based on Software Engineering principles. This process intends to make the specification and design of educational and recreational contents easier, and also ensures a balance between educational and playful components. To support this methodology, we present a pilot authoring tool that implements our design process. Keywords: Digital Game-Based Learning; Methodologies; Educational Video Games Design; Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Proceso de diseño para videojuegos educativos con actividades colaborativas Resumen El uso de un método de desarrollo específico para videojuegos educativos que facilite la definición de objetivos pedagógicos y lúdicos podría mejorar la eficiencia instructiva de este tipo de aplicaciones, sin perder su jugabilidad. Con esta intención, en este trabajo se presenta un proceso de diseño incremental que aplica principios de Ingeniería del Software para generar videojuegos educativos con actividades colaborativas.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Science Tasks and Puzzles in Computer Role Playing Games
    Multimodal Technologies and Interaction Article Integrating Science Tasks and Puzzles in Computer Role Playing Games Varvara Garneli * , Konstantinos Patiniotis and Konstantinos Chorianopoulos Department of Informatics, Ionian University, 49132 Corfu, Greece * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 15 May 2019; Accepted: 12 July 2019; Published: 15 July 2019 Abstract: The design of educational serious games to be used as motivational learning environments is very rewarding but also very challenging. The integration of learning with playing activities seems to be one of the major challenges. Previous work has not examined the integration of science content based on the school curriculum in the gameplay mechanics of a computer role playing game (CRPG) and in a storyline which ends with a dramatic conflict. In this study, an educational CRPG was designed for learning concepts in the physical sciences according to the curriculum of the correspondent book. We integrated the content into the gameplay which included several tasks to be performed and puzzles to be solved, advancing players to successfully complete the game, according to the game’s storyline. Finally, we performed a usability test for ease-of-use and enjoyment issues. Most testers considered the educational CRPG entertaining. Computer role playing game’s gameplay mechanics provide affordances for the integration of science and technology courses in a playful learning environment. Keywords: educational serious games; game design; role playing games; science education 1. Introduction Video games are a popular medium which have appeared in several forms and configurations following the development of digital technology. While entertaining video games feature only the “game” dimension, serious games can be defined as “a mental contest, played with a computer in accordance with specific rules, that uses entertainment to further government or corporate training, education, health, public policy, and strategic communication objectives” [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Motivational Styles in Educational Gamification
    Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences | 2017 Identifying Motivational Styles in Educational Gamification Jared R. Chapman, Ph.D, MBA, MSc – Utah Valley University – [email protected] Peter Rich, Ph.D. – Brigham Young University - [email protected] Abstract motivation in every society for thousands of years. In Little work has been done to understand the modern times, video games have perfected their motivational impact of specific game elements and motivational pull to near addiction. Angry Birds has how they combine to form student motivational styles been downloaded more than 1 billion times and more in educational gamification. In this exploratory study than 10 million subscribers have spent more than 50 we evaluate the level of motivation reported for a billion hours playing World of War Craft [36]. The variety of game elements by 184 students. Using this average gamer, comprising some 40% of the data we generated a principle components analysis to population, is now 20-34 years old, nearly half of identify the underlying factor structure that govern whom are women [28]. This increase and parity in the students’ motivational styles. Four motivational styles gaming population has led to a culture of college were identified: (1) Personal Progress – being students who may be more readily prepared to engage motivated by gamified elements that show one’s in game-based activities for serious learning. What can individual progress in a course; (2) Competition and we learn from games that might encourage students to Praise – being motivated by game elements that show spend more time in their studies, be more engaged, and one’s progress compared to their peers and provide as a result learn more? Seeking answers to these social reinforcing feedback; (3) Individual questions is at the core of understanding and applying Assignments – being motivated by completing gamification in education.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Educational Computer Games
    Beyond Edutainment Exploring the Educational Potential of Computer Games By Simon Egenfeldt-nielsen Submitted to the IT-University of Copenhagen as partial fulfilment of the requirements for the PhD degree February, 2005 Candidate: Simon Egenfeldt-Nielsen Købmagergade 11A, 4. floor 1150 Copenhagen +45 40107969 [email protected] Supervisors: Anker Helms Jørgensen and Carsten Jessen Abstract Computer games have attracted much attention over the years, mostly attention of the less flattering kind. This has been true for computer games focused on entertainment, but also for what for years seemed a sure winner, edutainment. This dissertation aims to be a modest contribution to understanding educational use of computer games by building a framework that goes beyond edutainment. A framework that goes beyond the limitations of edutainment, not relying on a narrow perception of computer games in education. The first part of the dissertation outlines the background for building an inclusive and solid framework for educational use of computer games. Such a foundation includes a variety of quite different perspectives for example educational media and non-electronic games. It is concluded that educational use of computer games remains strongly influenced by educational media leading to the domination of edutainment. The second part takes up the challenges posed in part 1 looking to especially educational theory and computer games research to present alternatives. By drawing on previous research three generations of educational computer games are identified. The first generation is edutainment that perceives the use of computer games as a direct way to change behaviours through repeated action. The second generation puts the spotlight on the relation between computer game and player.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide 2020 Games from Spain
    GUIDE GAMES 2020 FROM SPAIN Message from the CEO of ICEX Spain Trade and Investment Dear reader, We are proud to present the new edition of our “Guide to Games from Spain”, a publication which provides a complete picture of Spain’s videogame industry and highlights its values and its talent. This publication is your ultimate guide to the industry, with companies of various sizes and profiles, including developers, publishers and services providers with active projects in 2020. GAMES Games from Spain is the umbrella brand created and supported by ICEX Spain Trade and Investment to promote the Spanish videogame industry around the globe. You are cordially invited to visit us at our stands at leading global events, such us Game Con- nection America or Gamescom, to see how Spanish videogames are playing in the best global production league. Looking forward to seeing you soon, ICEX María Peña SPAIN TRADE AND INVESTMENT ICT AND DIGITAL CONTENT DEPARTMENT +34 913 491 871 [email protected] www.icex.es GOBIERNO MINISTERIO DE ESPAÑA DE INDUSTRIA, COMERCIO Y TURISMO EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND A WAY TO MAKE EUROPE GENERAL INDEX ICEX | DISCOVER GAMES FROM SPAIN 6 SPANISH VIDEOGAME INDUSTRY IN FIGURES 8 INDEX 10 DEVELOPERS 18 PUBLISHERS 262 SERVICES 288 DISCOVER www.gamesfromspain.com GAMES FROM SPAIN Silvia Barraclough Head of Videogames Animation and VR/AR ICEX, Spain Trade and Investment in collaboration with [email protected] DEV, the Spanish association for the development and +34 913 491 871 publication of games and entertainment software, is proud to present its Guide to Games from Spain 2020, the perfect way to discover Spanish games and com- panies at a glance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gamification Inventory 133
    The Gamification Inventory An Instrument for the Qualitative Evaluation of Gamification and its Application to Learning Management Systems Jan Broer October 25, 2017 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Engineering (Dr.-Ing.) to the faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science at the University of Bremen. 1st supervisor: Prof. Dr. Andreas Breiter 2nd supervisor: Prof. Dr. Thomas Köhler Abstract Gamification has risen meteorically in popularity since the beginning of the decade, both in practitioner circles and among researchers. We show that empirical results of gamification’s effects do not match the hype around it as studies have largely failed to prove any effects. We posit that a proper evaluation of gamification requires an understanding of how gamification can be expressed in real-world applications and employ Wittgensteinian family resemblances as a basis for such a definition. We have collected a set of properties that gamified applications can have through the analysis of goals and means of gamification mentioned in the literature and through an expert survey. We then used those results to create the Gamification Inventory, an instrument for the qualitative assessment of gamification in a given system. We have tested the instrument with a set of evaluators in the field of learning management systems (LMSs), informing both a refinement of the instrument and the preparation of an experiment with the intent of testing the effectiveness of common forms of gamification. The analysis of these LMSs led to results very similar to what our analysis of pre- vious empirical studies in gamification, and especially gamification in education, have shown: most gamification is concentrated on using points, badges, levels and leader- boards as game design elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaming” Genre: Serious Games, Genre Theory, and Rhetorical Action
    W573 l LIBRARY 2008 Michigan State University This is to certify that the thesis entitled “GAMING” GENRE: SERIOUS GAMES, GENRE THEORY, AND RHETORICAL ACTION presented by LEE SHERLOCK has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts degree in ' 'tal Rhetoric & Professional , “ Writing I \ -.—.—._ ' .I \VMaior Profésses’sfijgflétu re ‘ 9 $0?) Date —-u-.-o-c--c--n-u-n-o-n-n-- MSU is an afitnnative-action, equal-opportunity employer PLACE IN RETURN BOX to remove this checkout from your record. TO AVOID FINES return on or before date due. MAY BE RECALLED with earlier due date if requested. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE 6/07 p:/ClRC/DateDue.indd-p.1 “GAMING” GENRE: SERIOUS GAMES, GENRE THEORY, AND RHETORICAL ACTION By Lee Sherlock A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Digital Rhetoric & Professional Writing 2008 ABSTRACT “GAMING” GENRE: SERIOUS GAMES, GENRE THEORY, AND RHETORICAL ACTION By Lee Sherlock Despite recent increases in digital gaming research from rhetoric/ composition scholars, there have been relatively few scholarly treatments of serious games as sites of rhetorical action and critique. In response to this gap, I argue for the need for rhetoric/composition scholars to start “paying attention” to serious games. The disciplinary frameworks of rhetorical studies, literacy studies, and communication are employed to survey the current literature on serious gaming and identify points of synthesis. I then introduce a more focused idea drawn from rhetorical studies, genre theory, to examine the question of why scholars in rhetoric/composition should pay attention to and focus their work on serious games.
    [Show full text]