DOCSLIB.ORG

1.0 Introduction the Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1.0 Introduction the Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) California Marine Life Protection Act Initiative Regional Profile of the North Central Coast Study Region October 8, 2007 1.0 Introduction The Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) was signed into law in 1999. The MLPA mandates the redesign of a statewide system of marine protected areas (MPAs) that function, to the extent possible as a network. In August 2004, the California Resources Agency, California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), and Resource Legacy Fund Foundation signed a memorandum of understanding launching the MLPA Initiative and implementation of the MLPA along the central coast. Among other actions, the MLPA Initiative established the MLPA Blue Ribbon Task Force, the Master Plan Science Advisory Team (SAT), a statewide stakeholder interest group, and an MLPA Initiative staff. By December 2006 five key objectives were achieved by the MLPA Initiative: (1) a draft master plan framework was developed, (2) alternative proposals were developed for MPAs along the central coast and submitted to CDFG, (3) draft recommendations were made for long-term funding sources for MPA implementation and management, (4) draft recommendations were developed for increasing coordination and cooperation among state and federal agencies with the authority to manage marine resources, and (5) a recommended executive order to ensure implementation of the master plan by 2011 was submitted to the California Resources Agency (Memorandum of Understanding, August 2004). A draft master plan was developed (CDFG 2005a) and the stakeholder process for regional MPA planning in the central coast study region was completed in 2005-2006. In April 2007 the California Fish and Game Commission approved a set of central coast MPAs, and their associated regulations became effective in September 2007. A second memorandum of understanding, effective January 1, 2007, continues the public- private partnership for planning marine protected areas (MPAs) in the north central coast study region. The MLPA North Central Coast Regional Stakeholder Group (NCCRSG) was convened in 2007 to begin evaluating existing MPAs and planning potential new MPAs for the area extending from Alder Creek, five miles north of Point Arena in Mendocino County, to Pigeon Point in San Mateo County. This Regional Profile for the North Central Coast Study Region provides background information on the biological, oceanographic, socioeconomic, and governance setting for the north central coast study region; it is intended to provide basic regional information to support stakeholders and policy-makers in their understanding of the marine resources and heritage of the region, in their evaluation of existing MPAs within the study region, and in developing alternative proposals for changes to existing MPAs. The information is provided in the form of text summaries, tables, selected maps (with links to other computer-accessible maps), and technical appendices. The regional stakeholders and SAT have provided additional information to augment this profile through a joint fact-finding process. The regional profile helps to provide the context to develop alternatives that will meet the goals and objectives of the MLPA. The goals of the MLPA are: • Goal 1: To protect the natural diversity and abundance of marine life, and the structure, function, and integrity of marine ecosystems. 1 California Marine Life Protection Act Initiative Regional Profile of the North Central Coast Study Region October 8, 2007 • Goal 2: To help sustain, conserve, and protect marine life populations, including those of economic value, and rebuild those that are depleted. • Goal 3: To improve recreational, educational, and study opportunities provided by marine ecosystems that are subject to minimal human disturbance, and to manage these uses in a manner consistent with protecting biodiversity. • Goal 4: To protect marine natural heritage, including protection of representative and unique marine life habitats in California waters for their intrinsic value. • Goal 5: To ensure that California's MPAs have clearly defined objectives, effective management measures, and adequate enforcement, and are based on sound scientific guidelines. • Goal 6: To ensure that the MPAs are designed and managed, to the extent possible, as a component of a statewide network. The best readily available data are being compiled for use in the north central coast study region MPA planning process. This regional profile provides an overview of some of that data. All data in a spatial Geographic Information System (GIS) format are being housed in the California Marine Geodatabase at the University of California, Santa Barbara and viewable through an Internet Map Service site (www.marinemap.org/mlpa). Appendix I provides a list of the currently available spatial data layers. 2 California Marine Life Protection Act Initiative Regional Profile of the North Central Coast Study Region October 8, 2007 2.0 Description of the MLPA North Central Coast Study Region The MLPA North Central Coast Study Region covers state waters extending from a line due west from Alder Creek, five miles north of Point Arena, to a line extending due west of Pigeon Point, and includes state waters around the Farallon Islands, but does not include San Francisco Bay (see Map 1). The shoreward boundary was drawn at the beach for creeks and rivers, at the extent of tidal reach and estuarine vegetation in lagoons and estuaries, and at the Golden Gate Bridge (to exclude San Francisco Bay). Lagoons (such as Abbots Lagoon) that are mostly or entirely closed to tidal inundation and dominated by brackish-freshwater species are not included in the MLPA North Central Coast Study Region. To facilitate the display of information the region has been divided up into 6 sub-regions as follows: 1. Alder Creek/Point Arena to Horseshoe Point 2. Horseshoe Point to Bodega Head 3. Bodega Head to Double Point 4. Double Point to Point San Pedro 5. Point San Pedro to Pigeon Point 6. Farallon Islands The coastline covers a straight-line distance of 146 miles (mi), but it is actually much longer due to the undulations of the coastline (over 363 mi). In general, state waters extend from the high tide line to 3 nautical mi (nmi) seaward. However, state waters also include an area of 94.3 square miles around the Farallon Islands, which are located 28 miles offshore of the San Francisco Bay. The study region encompasses approximately 763.5 square miles and extends from the shoreline (mean high tide) to a maximum depth of approximately 382 ft (63.7 fm) off the Farallon Islands. The study region includes a broad array of habitats from intertidal to hard and soft bottom habitats on the continental shelf. The edge of the continental shelf where it transitions downward to become the continental slope is called the shelf-slope break, which occurs at approximately 200m; the continental slope is generally outside of the study region as the maximum depth in the region is 116m (380 feet, 63.4 fathoms). The continental shelf varies in width along the study region from 3.6 mi at its narrowest location to 27.2 mi at its widest location (where it extends beyond state waters) along the 100m contour. There are no submarine canyons in state waters in the region; however, there are some large canyons well offshore in federal waters. While much of the marine seafloor in the region is soft (sand or mud) bottom there are also rocky reefs, pinnacles, and rocky outcrops. Preliminary mapping of hard and soft bottom habitats in the entire study region is underway. The north central coast study region is part of the California Current Large Marine Ecosystem (LME), one of only 4 temperate upwelling systems in the world. The California Current LME is considered globally important for biodiversity because of its high productivity and the large numbers of species it supports (World Wildlife Fund, 2000). The California Current LME extends from Vancouver Island to Baja California and is a very productive ecosystem fueled by nutrient-rich upwelling which supports blooms of phytoplankton that form the foundation for a 3 California Marine Life Protection Act Initiative Regional Profile of the North Central Coast Study Region October 8, 2007 food web that includes many species of invertebrates, fish, marine mammals and seabirds. The north central coast study region is in the central part of the California Current LME and includes the most persistent upwelling center at Point Arena, the outflow of the largest estuary on the West Coast (San Francisco Bay), as well as the highly productive and biologically rich Gulf of the Farallones. This region has some of the highest numbers of species of fish, seabirds, and mammals in the North Pacific Ocean (PICES 2005; NOAA 2004). A major upwelling center occurs at Point Arena, with cold nutrient rich waters carried south along the entire Sonoma coast, deflected offshore at Point Reyes and out into the Gulf of Farallones. During the upwelling season, the waters are rich in nutrients that fuel highly productive and diverse ecosystems, with large numbers of top predators that are dependent on this seasonal abundance of prey resources. The nutrient rich upwelled waters fuel a productive pelagic foodweb that includes phytoplankton, krill, coastal pelagic species (anchovies, sardines, squid, etc), fish, seabirds, marine mammals, and sharks. High local productivity also attracts many migratory species. During non-upwelling seasons and El Niño years, the nutrients that flow out from San Francisco Bay become more important (NOAA 2004). Relative to other parts of the state, this study region is very important to many species of top predators that are key players in the coastal and open ocean food webs. There are specific areas in the region important as foraging and breeding grounds for populations of some top predators (Karl et al 2001; Yen et al 2004). The ecology of the study region has been relatively well characterized in several publicly available summary documents (Airame et al 2003; NOAA 2003; Karl et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Central Coast
    Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Consultation History......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Action Area ..................................................................................................................... 32 2. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT: BIOLOGICAL OPINION AND INCIDENTAL TAKE STATEMENT ......................................................................................................... 34 2.1 Analytical Approach ....................................................................................................... 34 2.2 Life History and Range-wide Status of the Species and Critical Habitat ...................... 35 2.3 Environmental Baseline .................................................................................................. 48 2.4 Effects of the Action ........................................................................................................ 62 2.5 Cumulative Effects .......................................................................................................... 76 2.6 Integration and Synthesis ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UCSC Special Collections and Archives MS 6 Morley Baer
    UCSC Special Collections and Archives MS 6 Morley Baer Photographs - Job Number Index Description Job Number Date Thompson Lawn 1350 1946 August Peter Thatcher 1467 undated Villa Moderne, Taylor and Vial - Carmel 1645-1951 1948 Telephone Building 1843 1949 Abrego House 1866 undated Abrasive Tools - Bob Gilmore 2014, 2015 1950 Inn at Del Monte, J.C. Warnecke. Mark Thomas 2579 1955 Adachi Florists 2834 1957 Becks - interiors 2874 1961 Nicholas Ten Broek 2878 1961 Portraits 1573 circa 1945-1960 Portraits 1517 circa 1945-1960 Portraits 1573 circa 1945-1960 Portraits 1581 circa 1945-1960 Portraits 1873 circa 1945-1960 Portraits unnumbered circa 1945-1960 [Naval Radio Training School, Monterey] unnumbered circa 1945-1950 [Men in Hardhats - Sign reads, "Hitler Asked for It! Free Labor is Building the Reply"] unnumbered circa 1945-1950 CZ [Crown Zellerbach] Building - Sonoma 81510 1959 May C.Z. - SOM 81552 1959 September C.Z. - SOM 81561 1959 September Crown Zellerbach Bldg. 81680 1960 California and Chicago: landscapes and urban scenes unnumbered circa 1945-1960 Spain 85343 1957-1958 Fleurville, France 85344 1957 Berardi fountain & water clock, Rome 85347 1980 Conciliazione fountain, Rome 84154 1980 Ferraioli fountain, Rome 84158 1980 La Galea fountain, in Vatican, Rome 84160 1980 Leone de Vaticano fountain (RR station), Rome 84163 1980 Mascherone in Vaticano fountain, Rome 84167 1980 Pantheon fountain, Rome 84179 1980 1 UCSC Special Collections and Archives MS 6 Morley Baer Photographs - Job Number Index Quatre Fountain, Rome 84186 1980 Torlonai
    [Show full text]
  • By Marc Sani
    RIDING SAN FRAN TO SOCAL — AGAIN BY MARC SANI id-afternoon on Friday at the and Lambie’s 14th year as its lead wrench. along with an assistant, worked late into Hyatt Hotel two blocks from San The 44-year-old Lambie remained the night to back up that guarantee. M Francisco’s famous Fisherman’s calm and matter-of-fact, assuring Wharf, and the most popular man on- each rider their bike would be ready A BUCKET LIST TREK site was Jamaica Lambie. At work in Saturday morning before setting out a small downstairs conference room, for Santa Cruz some 85 miles south. I’ve made this trek four times over he was assembling more than 30 bikes “The day before is always hectic,” said the last half-dozen years, and the shipped to the hotel — one day before Lambie. “A big part is dealing with best of the best is along the Central the start of the California Coast Classic. riders who shipped their bikes. They’re Coast. To be blunt, even here there A sense of organized chaos hung really anxious to find out if there was are sections I love and some I dread. in the air as bikes were unpacked and any damage,” he said. And there always Although challenging, it’s a route any checked for damage under the fearful is — mostly bent or broken derailer reasonably fit cyclist can handle. A eyes of their owners. And a steady hangars. “Shipping a bike is just about dollop of common sense and some stream of cyclists wandered through the most dangerous thing you can solid planning will deliver a first-class with questions and hopes for a last- do with a bike before a major ride,” adventure for young and old.
    [Show full text]
  • Historically Famous Lighthouses
    HISTORICALLY FAMOUS LIGHTHOUSES CG-232 CONTENTS Foreword ALASKA Cape Sarichef Lighthouse, Unimak Island Cape Spencer Lighthouse Scotch Cap Lighthouse, Unimak Island CALIFORNIA Farallon Lighthouse Mile Rocks Lighthouse Pigeon Point Lighthouse St. George Reef Lighthouse Trinidad Head Lighthouse CONNECTICUT New London Harbor Lighthouse DELAWARE Cape Henlopen Lighthouse Fenwick Island Lighthouse FLORIDA American Shoal Lighthouse Cape Florida Lighthouse Cape San Blas Lighthouse GEORGIA Tybee Lighthouse, Tybee Island, Savannah River HAWAII Kilauea Point Lighthouse Makapuu Point Lighthouse. LOUISIANA Timbalier Lighthouse MAINE Boon Island Lighthouse Cape Elizabeth Lighthouse Dice Head Lighthouse Portland Head Lighthouse Saddleback Ledge Lighthouse MASSACHUSETTS Boston Lighthouse, Little Brewster Island Brant Point Lighthouse Buzzards Bay Lighthouse Cape Ann Lighthouse, Thatcher’s Island. Dumpling Rock Lighthouse, New Bedford Harbor Eastern Point Lighthouse Minots Ledge Lighthouse Nantucket (Great Point) Lighthouse Newburyport Harbor Lighthouse, Plum Island. Plymouth (Gurnet) Lighthouse MICHIGAN Little Sable Lighthouse Spectacle Reef Lighthouse Standard Rock Lighthouse, Lake Superior MINNESOTA Split Rock Lighthouse NEW HAMPSHIRE Isle of Shoals Lighthouse Portsmouth Harbor Lighthouse NEW JERSEY Navesink Lighthouse Sandy Hook Lighthouse NEW YORK Crown Point Memorial, Lake Champlain Portland Harbor (Barcelona) Lighthouse, Lake Erie Race Rock Lighthouse NORTH CAROLINA Cape Fear Lighthouse "Bald Head Light’ Cape Hatteras Lighthouse Cape Lookout Lighthouse. Ocracoke Lighthouse.. OREGON Tillamook Rock Lighthouse... RHODE ISLAND Beavertail Lighthouse. Prudence Island Lighthouse SOUTH CAROLINA Charleston Lighthouse, Morris Island TEXAS Point Isabel Lighthouse VIRGINIA Cape Charles Lighthouse Cape Henry Lighthouse WASHINGTON Cape Flattery Lighthouse Foreword Under the supervision of the United States Coast Guard, there is only one manned lighthouses in the entire nation. There are hundreds of other lights of varied description that are operated automatically.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamental Resources and Values
    Park Significance- 1. The convergence of the San Andreas Fault Zone, San Francisco Bay at the Golden Gate, and the California coastline that creates a dynamic landscape and environment of exceptional scientific value. Fundamental Resources and Values 1.1 Geologic Resources – The national recreation area’s geologic resources include faults, plate margins and a subduction zone; a wide diversity of rock types and deposits representing more than one hundred million years of the Earth’s history; and the complex geologic processes that continue to shape the landscape. Analysis of Fundamental Resources and Values 1.1 Geologic Resources – The national recreation area’s geologic resources include faults, plate margins and a subduction zone; a wide diversity of rock types and deposits representing more than one hundred million years of the Earth’s history; and the complex geologic processes that continue to shape the landscape. Importance of the Resources and Values The San Francisco Bay region straddles the boundary zone between two of the Earth’s major tectonic plates. The Pacific Plate is slowly moving northward relative to the North American Plate along the San Andreas Fault Zone. Sea floor spreading in the middle of the Pacific Plate has pushed the edge of that plate under the North American Plate, creating a subduction zone. The San Andreas Fault, which extends most of the length of California, defines many of the major recognizable landforms in the park. The fault zone in GGNRA is evident along Tomales Bay, the Olema Valley and Bolinas Lagoon in Marin County, then extends offshore and makes landfall again at Fort Funston in San Francisco and is highlighted to the south by the lakes and reservoirs within San Francisco Watershed lands in San Mateo County.
    [Show full text]
  • California Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) Initiative Regional Profile of the Central Coast Study Region (Pigeon Point to Point Conception, CA)
    California Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) Initiative Regional Profile of the Central Coast Study Region (Pigeon Point to Point Conception, CA) September 19, 2005 (v.3.0) MLPA Central Coast Regional Stakeholder Group Central Coast Regional Profile September 19, 2005 (v.3.0) INSIDE COVER MEMO: This Final Regional Profile of the Central Coast Study Region (Pigeon Point to Point Conception, CA) provides information to support the implementation of the Marine Life Protection Act in this region. In addition to this document, the Regional Profile includes spatial data layers posted on the MLPA Internet Mapping Service (IMS) site (http://maps.msi.ucsb.edu/mlpa) and maps posted on the MLPA website (http://www.dfg.ca.gov/mrd/mlpa/draftdocuments.html). A draft of the Regional Profile was provided to the Central Coast Regional Stakeholder Group on June 1, 2005; a draft final version was provided to them on August 1, 2005. Verbal and written comments were received from the stakeholders and addressed to the extent possible in this final version. This final profile was reviewed by members of the MLPA Science Advisory Team. The MLPA Initiative and CDFG staff are compiling and developing additional data layers and conducting GIS analyses. All of the spatial data layers will eventually be posted on the MLPA IMS site. In addition, new research contracts have been initiated to collect additional data. These include: • An assessment of patterns of non-consumptive use in the Central California Coast (C. LaFranchi and M. Tamanaha; results provided in Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • President's Brunch See Page 4 Upcoming Tours Sunday February 24 - Pigeon Point Lighthouse - Pescadero, CA Saturday March 17 - St
    The Choke Rod preserving and restoring the Model A Ford since 1956 Volume 63, Issue 2 MAFCA 2018 Certifi cate of Merit February 2019 San Francisco Bay Area Chapter Model A Ford Club of America Photo by Cynthia Torres President's Brunch see page 4 Upcoming Tours Sunday February 24 - Pigeon Point Lighthouse - Pescadero, CA Saturday March 17 - St. Patrick's Day Parade - San Francisco Friday - Sunday April 12-14 - Overnighter to the Gold Country Sunday April 21 - Easter Parade - San Francisco The Choke Rod page 2 Volume 63, Issue 2 www.sfmodelaclub.org February 2019 Offi cial Publication of the San Francisco Bay Area Chapter President’s Message MAFCA We are off to a good start. My time as the perpetual OFFICERS president was confi rmed at the Presidio Social PRESIDENT Club during the President's Brunch. I am the El Mero Chingon Jafe or if you are Italian it is the Barry Kinney Capo di Tutti Capi. There is a reason I am the VICE PRESIDENTS undisputed leader, the President for Life. I just Tom Escher wanted to clear things up for all of you who might Gunard Mahl think of taking my place next year. Greg Martinez John Bettencourt, Joan Peterson, and Walter Caplan are three of the most capable people I know, are leading a tour down the Pacifi c SECRETARY Coast Highway in February to the Pigeon Point Light Station State Joan Peterson Historic Park followed by lunch at Duarte's Tavern in Pescadero. TREASURER The date is Sunday February 24. Look for details in this issue of the Jeanine Mahl Choke Rod.
    [Show full text]
  • San Mateo Coastside California: Shipwrecks and the Portuguese
    San Mateo Coastside California: Shipwrecks and the Portuguese By Lee Foster Author’s Note: This article “San Mateo Coastside California: Shipwrecks and the Portuguese” is a chapter in my new book/ebook Northern California History Travel Adventures: 35 Suggested Trips. The subject is also covered in my book/ebook Northern California Travel: The Best Options. That book is available in English as a book/ebook and also as an ebook in Chinese. Several of my books on California can be seen on my Amazon Author Page. In Brief Coastal San Mateo, south of San Francisco on Highway 1, is a joy to drive. It presents lighthouses and historic shipwrecks. The coastside also offers ethnic history (such as the arrival of Portuguese farmers). The area is dotted with small towns, and appealing beaches, some with tidepools. The Historic Story The San Mateo Coast between the Montara and Pigeon Point lighthouses offers a bucolic seaside drive. Along the way you will find sandy beaches, cabbage-family farmlands, and small coastal towns. Be sure to spend time in Half Moon Bay and Pescadero. In the busy summer travel season, morning fogs tend to burn off by noon. Because of that, you should plan this trip.as a late morning/early afternoon outing in summer. The Pigeon Point Lighthouse on the San Mateo Coast of California The road is relatively straight. That is to say, if you compare it to the roller-coaster rides found along the Mendocino/Sonoma coast north of San Francisco or in Big Sur, south of Monterey. Pick up Highway 1 on the southwest side of San Francisco and drive south.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) Records, MS 3980
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c86t0k0p Online items available Finding aid to the Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) records, MS 3980 Finding aid prepared by Marie Silva California Historical Society 678 Mission Street San Francisco, CA, 94105-4014 (415) 357-1848 [email protected] 2012 Finding aid to the Historic MS 3980 1 American Buildings Survey (HABS) records, MS 3980 Title: Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) records Date (inclusive): circa 1790-2012 Date (bulk): 1933-1965 Collection Identifier: MS 3980 Creator: Historic American Buildings Survey Extent: 63 boxes and 1 oversize box(30 linear feet) Contributing Institution: California Historical Society 678 Mission Street San Francisco, CA, 94105-4014 (415) 357-1848 [email protected] URL: http://www.californiahistoricalsociety.org/ Physical Location: Collection is stored onsite. Language of Materials: Collection materials are in English. Abstract: Collection comprises duplicate and original records of the Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS), dated between circa 1790 and 2011, with most records dating between 1933 and 1965. The bulk of the collection consists of duplicate HABS documentation for historic buildings and places in California and the National Park Service's Western Region, although the collection also includes fragmentary records for non-Western states, Panama, and Mexico. Buildings of historical merit, both “antique” (pre-1860) and newer, are recorded. Copies of official HABS documentation include photographic prints, negatives, photographic pages, inventory work sheets, photograph-data book reports, measured drawings, and other materials, prepared and submitted by the program’s surveyors. These materials are supplemented by administrative files, correspondence, survey notes, sketches, field notebooks, essays, ephemera, newspaper clippings, and other published materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Clyde Wahrhaftig Collection
    Clyde Wahrhaftig Collection GOGA 35329 Golden Gate National Recreation Area Park Archives and Records Center ATTN: Park Archives and Records Center Presidio of San Francisco Building 201, Fort Mason Building 667 McDowell Ave. San Francisco, CA 94123 San Francisco, CA 94129 [Mailing Address] [Physical Address] go.nps.gov/gogacollections Phone: 415-561-2807 Fax: 415-441-1618 Introduction Golden Gate National Recreation Area Park Description Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA), a unit of the National Park Service, was established by an Act of Congress on October 27, 1972. The 80,000-acre park encompasses a great diversity of cultural and natural resources in and around the Bay Area of San Francisco, California. It includes Muir Woods National Monument and Fort Point National Historic Site. The park holds almost five million three-dimensional and documentary artifacts dating from the time before European contact to the present. They are preserved and maintained for the public by the Division of Cultural Resources and Museum Management, which includes the Park Archives and Records Center (PARC). Park Archives and Records Center (PARC) Historical Note GGNRA and the sites within it have been collecting records since their inception. The PARC was established in 1994 to receive records and archival collections from the U.S. Army and the Presidio Army Museum after the closure of the Presidio of San Francisco as an Army base. The collections continue to grow through the donation of materials by private individuals, transfer of inactive park records by staff, and acquisition of relevant documentary materials. Scope of Collections The archival collections in the custody of the GGNRA document the history and activity of the various sites and groups associated with the park, described in the park’s Scope of Collection Statement (2009).
    [Show full text]
  • W • 32°38'47.76”N 117°8'52.44”
    public access 32°32’4”N 117°7’22”W • 32°38’47.76”N 117°8’52.44”W • 33°6’14”N 117°19’10”W • 33°22’45”N 117°34’21”W • 33°45’25.07”N 118°14’53.26”W • 33°45’31.13”N 118°20’45.04”W • 33°53’38”N 118°25’0”W • 33°55’17”N 118°24’22”W • 34°23’57”N 119°30’59”W • 34°27’38”N 120°1’27”W • 34°29’24.65”N 120°13’44.56”W • 34°58’1.2”N 120°39’0”W • 35°8’54”N 120°38’53”W • 35°20’50.42”N 120°49’33.31”W • 35°35’1”N 121°7’18”W • 36°18’22.68”N 121°54’5.76”W • 36°22’16.9”N 121°54’6.05”W • 36°31’1.56”N 121°56’33.36”W • 36°58’20”N 121°54’50”W • 36°33’59”N 121°56’48”W • 36°35’5.42”N 121°57’54.36”W • 37°0’42”N 122°11’27”W • 37°10’54”N 122°23’38”W • 37°41’48”N 122°29’57”W • 37°45’34”N 122°30’39”W • 37°46’48”N 122°30’49”W • 37°47’0”N 122°28’0”W • 37°49’30”N 122°19’03”W • 37°49’40”N 122°30’22”W • 37°54’2”N 122°38’40”W • 37°54’34”N 122°41’11”W • 38°3’59.73”N 122°53’3.98”W • 38°18’39.6”N 123°3’57.6”W • 38°22’8.39”N 123°4’25.28”W • 38°23’34.8”N 123°5’40.92”W • 39°13’25”N 123°46’7”W • 39°16’30”N 123°46’0”W • 39°25’48”N 123°25’48”W • 39°29’36”N 123°47’37”W • 39°33’10”N 123°46’1”W • 39°49’57”N 123°51’7”W • 39°55’12”N 123°56’24”W • 40°1’50”N 124°4’23”W • 40°39’29”N 124°12’59”W • 40°45’13.53”N 124°12’54.73”W 41°18’0”N 124°0’0”W • 41°45’21”N 124°12’6”W • 41°52’0”N 124°12’0”W • 41°59’33”N 124°12’36”W Public Access David Horvitz & Ed Steck In late December of 2010 and early Janu- Some articles already had images, in which ary of 2011, I drove the entire California I added mine to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Lighthouse Bibliography.Pdf
    Title Author Date 10 Lights: The Lighthouses of the Keweenaw Peninsula Keweenaw County Historical Society n.d. 100 Years of British Glass Making Chance Brothers 1924 137 Steps: The Story of St Mary's Lighthouse Whitley Bay North Tyneside Council 1999 1911 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1911 1912 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1912 1913 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1913 1914 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1914 1915 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1915 1916 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1916 1917 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1917 1918 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1918 1919 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1919 1920 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1920 1921 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1921 1922 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1922 1923 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1923 1924 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1924 1925 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1925 1926 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1926 1927 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1927 1928 Report of the Commissioner of
    [Show full text]