California Institute of Technology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

California Institute of Technology DIVISION OF THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY PASADENA. CALIFORNIA 91125 SOME CONVENTIONAL ORTHODOXIES IN THE STUDY OF AGRARIAN CHANGE Robert H. Bates ,\'\c,1\lUTfOf: �� ,.�c. � � 0 � t".'. _, 0 < Cl l..J . -<. � t:; � � � ,.....;;;, �): ,..., It SlfALL �pi.\1-.� This is an early version of a paper which will appear in an overly edited form in World Politics in early 1984. I wish to thank Eleanor Searle and Philip Hoffman for their contributions to this manuscript. SOCIAL SCIENCE WORKING PAPER 458 December J 982 Revised December 1983 SOME CONVENTIONAL ORTHOOOXIES IN THE STUDY OF AGRAR IAN CHANGE ABSTRACT Robert H. Bates The purpose of this paper is critically to review two -ujor California Institute of Technology approaches to the analysis of agrarian societies and to do so in light of evidence taken from Africa. Sweet sm il ing village, loveliest of the lawn, Thy sport s are tled, and all thy charms withdrawn; The first app roach posits the existence of "natural" societies ; Am idst thy bowers the tyrant's hand is seen, And desolation saddens all thy green : the second, "p easant" societies. Both approaches attribute One only master grabs the whole domain, And half a village st ints thy smiling plain. psychological and institutional characteristics to these societies. * * * Far, far away thy children leav e the land. When subject to the exogenous shock s of intrusive political and Ill fares the land, to hastening ill a prey , Where wealth accumulate s, and men decay : econom ic forces, these attributes then generate characteristic patterns Princes and lords may flourish, or may fade; A breath can make them, as a breath has made : of change. The existence of such "p re-cap it alist" societies is thus But a bold peasantry, their country's pride, When once de stroyed, can never be supp lied. often invoked to account for patterns of change in contemporary rural * * * But now the sounds of population fail. societies. No cheerful murmurs fluctuate in the gale, No busy steps the grass-grown foot-way tread, On the basis of African materials, the paper argues that these For all the bloomy flush of life is fled. All but yon widowed, solitary thing, approaches are ov erly cultural. They are ov erly economist, under- * That feebly bends beside the plashy spring. valuing the importance of the state. Many of the so-called pre- * Oliver Goldsmith, ,.l'he Deserted Vil lage" in Selected Work s of Oliver Goldsmith (London : Ma cMillan and Co. , 1920) , pp . 358-360 capitalist features of these societies are them selves arguably products Permit me to inscribe this Poem to you. of their encounter with agents of capitalism. Moreover, many result How far you may be pleased with the versification and mere mechanical parts of this attempt , I do not pretend to from the effort s of states to secure domination and control ov er rural inquire; but I know you will object (and indeed several of our best and wisest friends concur in this op inion) that the populations. depop ulation it deplore s is no where to be seen, and the disorders it laments are only to be found in the poet's own imagination. To this I can scarcely mak e any ther answer than that I sincerely * i believe what I hav e writt en. ** Oliver Goldsmith, "To Sir Joshua Reynolds, " letter transmitting "The Deserted Village" to Sir Joshua Reynolds , in Selected Work s of Oliver Goldsmith, p. 355 . 3 2 subjectivi st, value-based account s of these institution s are therefore INTRODUCTION false. The purpose of thi s paper is criti cally to review two major 3. A third criti ci sm is that the prevailing theories are approaches to the analysi s of agrarian societies and to do so in light ov erly economist. In parti cular, they ten d to un der-value the of evidence taken from Africa. The African data provoke considerable importance of the state. Many of the di stinctive institutions of skeptici sm con cerning the validity of these cont emp orary orthodoxies agrarian societies, I argue, result from the efforts of the state to and support three major counter argument s: secure dominati on an d control over rural populations; and many of the 1. The reigning orthodoxies posit the existence of two forms of behaviors attributed to the preferences of rural dw ellers result from agrarian societi es. In some cases, these societies are classified as strategi c interactions with public agencies which seek to extract goods "natural" societies; in others, they are classified as "p easant". In an d services from them. In sofar as the in stitution s and behaviors both cases, they are held to be pre-capitalist. A major thesis of this exhibited by agrarian societies define a peasantry, in short, states essay is that this last contention is false. For the very traits that create peasants. lead these societies to be classified as pre-capitalist - e.g. the exi stence of common land rights; the avoidan ce of market exchanges; the INTRODUCING THE DOMINANT ORTHODOX IES turning to subsistence production, reciprocity and such social Amon g the most prominent of the current approa ches, two stan d institution s as the family system for economi c support - are them selves out : the "n atural" and "p easant" economy models of rural society. arguably product s of the encounter of agrarian societies with agents of These models contain both stati c and dynami c elements. The first capitalism. 1 provide the initial condition s and the defining instit utional and 2. A second argument is that the current orthodoxies are behavi oral characteristics; when linked, these static elements generate ov erly cultural. The orthodox position s tend to account for agrarian characteri sti c pattern s of change and signi ficant implications for institutions in terms of the values of rural dwellers, e.g. their public policy. desire to secure subsi sten ce or to gain social stan din g. This essay in stead argue s that key agrarian in stituti ons represent compromises and adaptations; equally as often, they represent impo sition s from above by more powerful external agent s. In either case, agrarian in stitution s cannot represent institutionalized expression s of agrarian value s and 4 5 The Myt h of the Natural Economy TABLE 1 The critical elem ents of the model of the natural economy are Schematic Presentation of the Model of a Natural Economy present ed in table 1. In this section, I elaborate upon this schematic suDDllari zation . Initial Conditions: The origins of this model lie widely scatter ed. The model i. Agrarian economy. derives as much from Polanyi as from Marx and Engels ; 2 its roots stem ii. Production for use rather than exchange. as well from Tonnies notion of societies based upon the principles of iii . Insignificance of markets . gem einschaft, and from Maine's notion of societies based upon status . 3 Institutional Characteristics: In more recent times, the model has been advanced by Dalton, Wolf, i. "Connnunal" land rights; Migdal, and Scott, writers whose works have been grouped by their a. Use rights accorded to producers if and only if principal critic, Samuel Popkin, into the "moral economy" school of producer a member of the coDD11unity . 4 social analysis . b. Rights to land revert to community when use rights no longer exercised . Initial Conditions: Accor ding to the model of the natural ii . Importance of the primary community and, in particular, economy, "primitive" agrarian societies produce not for exchange but the village . for use; as a consequence Behavioral Characteristics: i. The desire for sel f-su fficiency. market exchanges are usually peripheral, in the sense that most ii . The importance of status . sellers do not acquire the bulk of their livelihood, and buyers iii . The importance of equality. the bulk of their daily used goods and services, via Patterns of Change: market-place sales and purchases •• • labor and land do not i. Initial opposition to "commoditization." enter the market and basic livelihood is acquir ed in non-market ii . Social disintegration in the face of markets . spheres • • • all important output and factor flows are carried on iii . Radicalization un der the impact of capitalism . via reciprocity and redistribution . 5 Corollaries: The preference of agrarian societies for communal forms of economic organization . 6 7 In the absence of market s, resources are not allocated in accord with in his discussion of the Germanic form of pre-capitalist society - a their value in exchange; rather, the patterns of allocation are discussion which is far more app licable to the analysis of African determined by social relationships. As Dalton states, societies than is his more widely cited discussion of the Asiatic form - "property therefore means belonging to a tribe.... 11 9 Specifically, these primitive social econom ies are so organized Critical too is the imp ortance of face-to-face communities, that the allocation of labour and land, work organization within and, in particular, the village. Along with kin-based organizations, productive processes, and the disposition of goods and services - villages are viewed as the central social institution of agrarian in short, production and distribution - are expressions of societies. The importance of the village is perhap s best suggested by underlying kinship obligation, tribal affiliation, and religious Scott : and moral duty. There is no separate economic system to be 6 analyzed independent ly of social organization. In almost every case [in Sout heast Asia] the village has constituted something more than merely a physical aggregation of Institut ional Characteristics : Nowhere is the determining households.
Recommended publications
  • Ferguson Diss
    PERMACULTURE AS FARMING PRACTICE AND INTERNATIONAL GRASSROOTS NETWORK: A MULTIDISCIPLINARY STUDY BY JEFFREY FERGUSON DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Crop Sciences in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2015 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Sarah Taylor Lovell, Chair Professor Michelle M. Wander Associate Professor Ashwini Chhatre Professor Thomas J. Bassett ABSTRACT Agroecology is a promising alternative to industrial agriculture, with the potential to avoid the negative social and ecological consequences of input-intensive production. Transitioning to agroecological production is, however, a complex project that requires action from all sectors of society – from producers and consumers, and from scientists and grassroots networks. Grassroots networks and movements are increasingly regarded as agents of change, with a critical role to play in agroecological transition as well as broader socio-environmental transformation. Permaculture is one such movement, with a provocative perspective on agriculture and human-environment relationships more broadly. Despite its relatively broad international distribution and high public profile, permaculture has remained relatively isolated from scientific research. This investigation helps to remedy that gap by assessing permaculture through three distinct projects. A systematic review offers a quantitative and qualitative assessment of the permaculture literature,
    [Show full text]
  • English Agricultural Output 1550–1750
    BRITISH ECONOMIC GROWTH, 1270-1870 Stephen Broadberry, University of Warwick, [email protected] Bruce Campbell, Queen‟s University Belfast, [email protected] Alexander Klein, University of Warwick, [email protected] Mark Overton, University of Exeter, [email protected] Bas van Leeuwen, University of Warwick, [email protected] 14 July 2010 File: BritishGDPLongRun8.doc Abstract: We provide annual estimates of GDP for England between 1270 and 1700 and for Great Britain between 1700 and 1870, constructed from the output side. The GDP data are combined with population estimates to calculate GDP per capita. We find English per capita income growth of 0.20 per cent per annum between 1270 and 1700, although growth was episodic, with the strongest growth during the Black Death crisis of the fourteenth century and in the second half of the seventeenth century. For the period 1700-1870, we find British per capita income growth of 0.48 per cent, broadly in line with the widely accepted Crafts/Harley estimates. This modest trend growth in per capita income since 1270 suggests that, working back from the present, living standards in the late medieval period were well above “bare bones subsistence”. This can be reconciled with modest levels of kilocalorie consumption per head because of the very large share of pastoral production in agriculture. Acknowledgements: This paper forms part of the project “Reconstructing the National Income of Britain and Holland, c.1270/1500 to 1850”, funded by the Leverhulme Trust, Reference Number F/00215AR. It is also part of the Collaborative Project HI-POD supported by the European Commission's 7th Framework Programme for Research, Contract Number SSH7-CT-2008-225342.
    [Show full text]
  • Peasant Transformation in Kenya: a Focus on Agricultural Entrepreneurship with Special Reference to Improved Fruit and Dairy Farming in Mbeere, Embu County
    PEASANT TRANSFORMATION IN KENYA: A FOCUS ON AGRICULTURAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO IMPROVED FRUIT AND DAIRY FARMING IN MBEERE, EMBU COUNTY BY GEOFFREY RUNJI NJERU NJERU A THESIS SUBMITTED IN FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, INSTITUTE FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES (IDS), UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI AUGUST 2016 DECLARATION This thesis is my original work and has not been submitted for a degree in any other university. Geoffrey Runji Njeru Njeru Signature……………………………………………. Date …………………………… This thesis was submitted for examination with our approval as university supervisors. Professor Njuguna Ng‟ethe Signature …………………………………….. Date……………………………………. Professor Karuti Kanyinga Signature ……………………………………. Date …………………………………….. Dr. Robinson Mose Ocharo Signature…………………………………….. Date …………………………………….. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION............................................................................................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................ iii LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................... vii LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................... viii ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ........................................................................ ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Urban and Agricultural Communities: Opportunities for Common Ground
    Urban and Agricultural Communities: Opportunities for Common Ground Council for Agricultural Science and Technology Printed in the United States of America Cover design by Lynn Ekblad, Different Angles, Ames, Iowa Graphics by Richard Beachler, Instructional Technology Center, Iowa State University, Ames ISBN 1-887383-20-4 ISSN 0194-4088 05 04 03 02 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Urban and Agricultural Communities: Opportunities for Common Ground p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ). ISBN 1-887383-20-4 (alk. paper) 1. Urban agriculture. 2. Land use, Urban. 3. Agriculture--Economic aspects. I. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. S494.5.U72 U74 2002 630'.91732-dc21 2002005851 CIP Task Force Report No. 138 May 2002 Council for Agricultural Science and Technology Ames, Iowa Task Force Members Lorna Michael Butler (Cochair and Lead Coauthor), College of Agriculture, Departments of Sociology and Anthropology, Iowa State University, Ames Dale M. Maronek (Cochair and Lead Coauthor), Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater Contributing Authors Nelson Bills, Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York Tim D. Davis, Texas A&M University Research and Extension Center, Dallas Julia Freedgood, American Farmland Trust, Northampton, Massachusetts Frank M. Howell, Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State John Kelly, Public Service and Agriculture, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina Lawrence W. Libby, Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics, The Ohio State University, Columbus Kameshwari Pothukuchi, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan Diane Relf, Department of Horticulture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg John K.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioral Ecology and Household-Level Production for Barter and Trade in Premodern Economies
    UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works Title “Every Tradesman Must Also Be a Merchant”: Behavioral Ecology and Household-Level Production for Barter and Trade in Premodern Economies Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9hq2q96v Journal Journal of Archaeological Research, 27(1) ISSN 1059-0161 Authors Demps, K Winterhalder, B Publication Date 2019-03-15 DOI 10.1007/s10814-018-9118-6 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California J Archaeol Res https://doi.org/10.1007/s10814-018-9118-6 “Every Tradesman Must Also Be a Merchant”: Behavioral Ecology and Household‑Level Production for Barter and Trade in Premodern Economies Kathryn Demps1 · Bruce Winterhalder2 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract While archaeologists now have demonstrated that barter and trade of material commodities began in prehistory, theoretical eforts to explain these fnd- ings are just beginning. We adapt the central place foraging model from behavioral ecology and the missing-market model from development economics to investigate conditions favoring the origins of household-level production for barter and trade in premodern economies. Interhousehold exchange is constrained by production, travel and transportation, and transaction costs; however, we predict that barter and trade become more likely as the number and efect of the following factors grow in impor- tance: (1) local environmental heterogeneity diferentiates households by production advantages; (2) preexisting social mechanisms minimize transaction costs; (3) com- modities have low demand elasticity; (4) family size, gender role diferentiation, or seasonal restrictions on household production lessen opportunity costs to participate in exchange; (5) travel and transportation costs are low; and (6) exchange oppor- tunities entail commodities that also can function as money.
    [Show full text]
  • Concept of Peasant Society and Peasant Culture
    Concept of peasant society and peasant culture A peasant is a pre-industrial agricultural labourer or farmer with limited land ownership, especially one living in the Middle Ages under feudalism and paying rent, tax, fees, or services to a landlord. In Europe, three classes of peasants existed: slave, serf, and free tenant. Peasants hold title to land either in fee simple or by any of several forms of land tenure, among them socage, quit-rent, leasehold, and copyhold. In a colloquial sense, "peasant" often has a pejorative meaning that is therefore seen as insulting and controversial in some circles, even when referring to farm labourers in the developing world. as early as in 13th-century Germany the word also could mean "rustic," or "robber," as the English term villain. In 21st- century English, the term includes the pejorative sense of "an ignorant, rude, or unsophisticated person". The word rose to renewed popularity in the 1940s- 1960s , as a collective term, often referring to rural populations of developing countries in general - as the "semantic successor to 'native', incorporating all its condescending and racial overtones". The word peasantry is commonly used in a non-pejorative sense as a collective noun for the rural population in the poor and developing countries of the world The term peasant literally means a person working on the land with simple tools. Even tlie entire rural population including the big landlords and the agricultural labourers have been treated as peasantry. This treatment does overlook the differences between and among the categories both in terms of the land holdings, technology, employment of labour etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Agriculture NO
    Urban agriculture NO. 155 // THEME 01 // WEEK 29 // JULY 20, 2018 THEME 01 Urban agriculture FOOD AGRICULTURE CITY We are moving to cities in a fast pace. Rapid urbanization is taking us farther away from the countryside and the sources of our food production. This leads to costly problems such as food waste and health issues. Urban agriculture can address these problems by creating integral solutions. Our observations • In 30 years’ time, more than two-thirds of the world’s population will be living in urban areas, according to a United Nations report. Today, already more than half of the world’s population live in an urban area. Rapid urbanization into cities puts serious strains on the food chain (with increasing meat consumption as the most important example of this) and municipal water supplies. • Urban health problems are growing. High intake of energy-dense food that is cheap and available anywhere and anytime, coupled with limited physical activity, leads to rising health problems, especially obesity. Citizens of lower economic classes particularly struggle to reliably access nutritious, healthy food. • Around the world, we waste approximately a third of the food produced. Although food is lost along the chain, most is lost towards the end of it: at restaurants or households. • Research shows that urban agriculture, defined as the growing of crops in cities, could produce 10% of the global output of legumes, roots and tubers, and vegetable crops or 180 million metric tons of food a year. Furthermore, this study has quantified that the benefits of urban agriculture (energy savings, climate regulation, biological control of pests, etc.) could amount to $80-160 billion annually.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitalist Dynamics from Above and Below in China
    Forthcoming July 2015 with the special issue "AGRARIAN CHANGE IN CONTEMPORARY CHINA" of Journal of Agrarian Change Agrarian Capitalization without Capitalism?: Capitalist Dynamics from Above and Below in China Hairong Yan and Yiyuan Chen Abstract: Cooperatives, family farms, and dragon-head enterprises are emerging as new subjects of agriculture in China and are being promoted by the Chinese government as engines of agricultural development. The current dynamics of increasing capitalization of agriculture in China has been characterized by scholar Philip Huang as ‘capitalization without proletarianization’. Through case studies, we examine the dynamics of accumulation in Chinese agriculture, as well as the government's agriculture policy shift. We argue that capitalist dynamics exist in Chinese agricultural production and they come from above and below. We also argue that Chinese government’s policy shift toward de-peasantization began in the early years of the rural reform. Keywords: capital accumulation, agrarian capitalism, agrarian populism, Chayanov, China INTRODUCTION: CONTEXT AND DEBATES Thirty some years of market reform has significantly transformed China’s agrarian society and agricultural production. The official political discourse in China disavows Chinese capitalism in general. The Chinese government avows upholding socialism and making markets play ‘a decisive role’ at the same breath (China Daily 2013). It is reported that the private sector already employs 85 per cent of the national labour force, owns 60 per cent of the enterprise capital (Lu 2013) and produced more than 60 per cent GDP in 2013 (Xinhuawang 2014). Reform is underway to open the remaining public sector for private investors. With regard to agricultural sector, the latest national policy asserts ‘socialist market economy’, but strengthens a market-determined pricing system and promotes new subjects (agents) of agriculture that include agribusiness, cooperatives and family farms.
    [Show full text]
  • The State, Capital and Peasantry In
    THE STATE, CAPITAL AND PEASANTRY IN THE AGRARIAN TRANSITION OF CHINA: THE CASE OF GUANGXI SUGARCANE SECTOR SUGARCANE GUANGXI OF CASE THE CHINA: OF TRANSITION AGRARIAN THE IN PEASANTRY AND CAPITAL STATE, THE THE STATE, CAPITAL AND PEASANTRY IN THE AGRARIAN TRANSITION OF CHINA: THE CASE OF GUANGXI SUGARCANE SECTOR JIN ZHANG JIN ZHANG Propositions 1. China’s oversea expansion is related to market share, not resource extraction (this thesis). 2. Agro-technologies benefit agro-companies but hurt peasants (this thesis). 3. China’s food self-sufficiency is economically inefficient. 4. Privatization leads to poverty. 5. Skewed sex ratio has little impact on gender inequality. 6. Doing a PhD lowers job security. Propositions belonging to the thesis entitled: “The State, Capital and Peasantry in the Agrarian Transition of China: the Case of Guangxi Sugarcane Sector” Jin Zhang Wageningen, 8th April 2019 The State, Capital and Peasantry in the Agrarian Transition of China: The Case of Guangxi Sugarcane Sector Jin Zhang Thesis committee Promotor Prof. Dr J.D. van der Ploeg Emeritus Professor of Transition Processes in Europe Wageningen University & Research Prof. Dr S.M. Borras Professor of Rural Development, Environment and Population Studies International Institute of Social Studies, The Hague Co-promotors Prof. Dr Huifang Wu Professor of Sociology China Agricultural University, Beijing, China Other members Prof. Dr W.J.M. Heijman, Wageningen University & Research Dr N.B.M. Heerink, Wageningen University & Research Prof. Dr Jingzhong Ye, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P.R. China Dr Heather X.Q. Zhang, University of Leeds, UK This research was conducted under the auspices of the Wageningen School of Social Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Was China Trapped in an Agrarian Society? an Economic Geographical Approach to the Needham Puzzle [Post-Print]
    Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Faculty Scholarship 12-2011 Why Was China Trapped in an Agrarian Society? An Economic Geographical Approach to the Needham Puzzle [post-print] Guanzhong James Wen Trinity College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/facpub Part of the Economics Commons Why Was China Trapped in an Agrarian Society--An Economic Geographical Approach to the Needham Puzzle Guanzhong James Wen1 Department of Economics [email protected] Abstract This paper argues that before the world started to globalize, the differences in the geographical endowments that different population faced were the most important constraints to their long-term production and consumption. The paper uses this central hypothesis to explain the sharp contrast between the flourishing Song and the stagnant Ming and Qing. During the Song dynasty, despite the fact that China lost a significant amount of arable land to invading nomads as its population peaked, China witnessed a higher urbanization level, more prosperous commerce and international trade, and an explosion of technical inventions and institutional innovations. However, after having significantly improved its man-to-land ratio in the period after the Song China only found itself induced deeper into the agrarian trap, resulting in reduced urbanization, withering foreign trade, a declining division of labor, and stagnant in technology. Keyword: Needham Puzzle; Geographical Endowment; Heckscher-Ohlin Model JEL Classification N 15, O 31, R 12 1 I want to thank an anonymous referee for constructive suggestions, A. Grossberg for editing help, J. Xiong for preparing a table and a figure, and Trinity College for financial help.
    [Show full text]
  • Agrarian-Urban Land Commodification in India's
    SHAREHOLDER CITIES: AGRARIAN-URBAN LAND COMMODIFICATION IN INDIA’S CORRIDOR REGIONS SAI BALAKRISHNAN ASSISTANT PROFESSOR IN URBAN PLANNING HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF DESIGN SEPTEMBER 2018 This is an unedited draft of the intro chapter for a book that has been accepted for publication by the University of Pennsylvania Press (Forthcoming 2019) Please do not cite without permission TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. CORRIDOR REGIONS ..................................................................................................................... 1 2. FROM RAILWAYS AND BIG DAMS TO ECONOMIC CORRIDORS ............................42 3. FROM SUGAR TO REAL ESTATE .............................................................................................90 4. FROM FORESTS TO IPO ........................................................................................................... 122 5. FROM WASTE LAND TO SEZ ................................................................................................. 158 6. SHAREHOLDER CITIES ............................................................................................................ 190 APPENDIX I: LAND PREPARATION FOR URBANIZATION .................................................. 222 APPENDIX II: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ............................................................................... 229 BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................................................................................................... 234 1: CORRIDOR REGIONS In 2001, the newly liberalized
    [Show full text]
  • Read an Extract from the World of the Small Farmer
    Contents List of maps and tables vii General Editor’s preface ix Acknowledgements xi Abbreviations xiii 1 Introduction 1 Attitudes towards the ‘peasantry’ 5 The outlook of small farmers 8 Commercially orientated cultivators 10 The dual economy 11 The small farmers of Brent Marsh 13 2 The Brent Marsh parishes and their inhabitants 16 The moors 20 Common meadow and other grazing rights 25 Communications and markets 27 Population 29 Non-agricultural occupations 33 3 Landholding and local society 39 The manors 39 Customary tenure 46 The switch to leasehold for lives 64 Free and copyhold land in the provision for children 66 The use and attraction of copyhold for lives 72 Conclusion 79 4 Making a living from the land 81 Land use in the Levels 81 Farming in the Levels 87 The production of individual farmers 100 The income of small farmers and landholders 104 Commercial leasing in the Levels 111 5 Family and inheritance in Brent Marsh 117 Handing on assets to children 117 Payment of legacies and the economic effects 135 Conclusion 139 6 Wealth, society and national politics 161 Wealth in the Levels 163 Growth of religious divisions 172 Grass roots politics in the Civil War 177 Reactions to the Commonwealth and Interregnum 178 Political attitudes in the later seventeenth century 182 Conclusion 192 7 Small farmers and early modern agriculture: an obstacle to change 194 or a commercial contribution? Economic attitudes of small farmers in the Levels 196 Small farmers and economic change 200 Sources and bibliography 202 Index 217 Chapter 1 Introduction My interest in the small family farmer began many years ago, at a time when the image of early modern farming, in both general agricultural histories and detailed local studies, was very different from what I knew about farming in Somerset.
    [Show full text]