sign in sign up
<<
Home , Isospin, Lambda baryon

arXiv:2102.00658v1 [hep-ph] 1 Feb 2021 nsm fteprmtrztos[ parameterizations included the often was of and FFs some may in in extent violation some to allowed be the therefore that One thinks decays. inter- usually resonance electroweak as from such contributions processes action be How- can interaction. there fragmenta- strong ever, the The by dominated is processes. process tion interaction strong and QCD F fi shl nsrn interaction. strong in held in is extent accommodated it what be if to can FFs yes, violation if symmetry and, isospin sys- whether the a see make to to to challenge urgent study and great tematic important a therefore is be It could QCD. that violation substantial po- the violation of FF parameterizations the larized The extent accommodated. what be to can up investigated been never direct the and processes associated the in Λ [ of data ization Belle the of im- attracted tures have [ and studies attentions the mediate in window new a open Λ of in polarization transverse the on measurements Recent ssi ymtyvoaini h orsodn polar- corresponding the FF in ized violation symmetry isospin ut hwadsic ieec ewe h polarization the between difference in distinct a show sults hr and Λ where tsmall at aearaybe are u ydffrn rus[ groups different by out Parameterizations carried Λ. been by already carried have parent the of tion tnigtpci h edo ihEeg hsc [ Physics Energy a High been of field have the and in properties topic (QCD) basic standing chromodynamics the FFs quantum on of of studies information The important reactions. provide energy high describing in in production quantities important most the of one h ssi nainei udmna rpryof property fundamental a is invariance isospin The Introduction e + e − → z D Λ 1 ⊥ where , D q T Λ e Λ el aao h rnvreplrzto fΛcnb reprodu be can functions. produ Λ fragmentation Λ of polarized for polarization of corresponding violation transverse magnitudes the the symmetry the on isospin of data the and estimate Belle that rough show as a we present such case, We frag for other decays. held weak for is allowed symmetry isospin are symmetry the violations isospin case the unpolarized the assume We in account. into contributions + a-a Chen, Kai-bao h 1 ⊥ ( q T h e + z Λ emk ytmtcsuyo h ssi ymtyo fragmen of symmetry isospin the of study systematic a make We χ − ± ,i.e., ), n odzoeBuoKslr taadleTbrle26 I 286, Tabarelle delle Strada Kessler, Bruno Fondazione and ( 3 2 4 z colo hsc n ehooy nvriyo ia,Jina Jinan, of University Technology, and Physics of School niiain yBleclaoain[ collaboration Belle by annihilations aayi em ola oasignificant a to lead to seems -analysis uoenCnr o hoeia tde nNcerPhysics Nuclear in Studies Theoretical for Centre European h rgetto ucin(F is (FF) function fragmentation The : r ndffrn eipee.Tere- The hemispheres. different in are ie n[ in given ) n htin that and z 1 Λ colo cec,Sadn inh nvriy ia,Sha Jinan, University, Jianzhu Shandong Science, of School 4 – stelniuia oetmfrac- momentum longitudinal the is D 6 .Oeo h otsrkn fea- striking most the of One ]. 1 ⊥ 3 u T stebhvoso h polar- the of behaviors the is ] Λ e aoaoyo atcePyisadPril Irradiatio and Physics Particle of Laboratory Key ssi ymtyo rgetto Functions Fragmentation of Symmetry Isospin 1, ( z 5 ∗ ) e , 6= hnogUiest,Qndo hnog263,China 266237, Shandong Qingdao, University, Shandong + u-agLiang, Zuo-tang 6 e hwsc la and clear a such show ] D 2 − nttt fFote n nedsilnr Science, Interdisciplinary and Frontier of Institute 1 ⊥ 2 → d T .Hwvr thas it However, ]. Λ ( Λ z h e ). + − e X − especially , → 2, † Λ a-e Pan, Yan-lei 1 h 5 , ± , 2 X 6 3 ]. ] ] iin [ lisions zto [ ization ffc in effect in of polarization such transverse connections the different as in measured been have actions eas eosrt htteBledt [ data Belle interaction. the strong that in demonstrate as holds also tiny We symmetry electroweak be isospin only to the can as violations due long such that FFs show We in decays. violation symmetry isospin studies. future also for therefore situation is the It clarify to connection. important this in explicitly studied et hr sn edt nrdc infiatisospin significant a FF. the introduce in to violation need symmetry no is There kept. fteiopnsmer o h oaie FF polarized the for symmetry isospin the if [ [ aspects FF nomenological transfer polarized For the longitudinal on the concentrate studies. most studies of process, the fragmentation plenty of in inspired polarization hyperon have the and surprises us esrd[ measured 18 inprocess tion u ea otiuin xlctys that so explicitly contributions decay out h rtplrzdF fti ls hthsee enpa- been ever has that class this [ of rameterized FF polarized first the n sdsrbdb h oaie FF polarized the quark by unpolarized hyperon described an of of is polarization fragmentation and the induced in an produced is It annihilations. n h eetosraino h lblpolarization global the of observation recent the and ] re- energy high in produced hadrons of Polarizations nti ae,w rsn ytmtcaayi fthe of analysis systematic a present we paper, this In h noaie FF Unpolarized The 2, D D D ‡ 1 1 1 h h,h h, q q q dec uknSong, Yu-kun ( 7 etto ucin fΛadol tiny only and Λ of functions mentation 12 j z – ( e fteiopnsmer skp in kept is symmetry isospin the if ced AA = ) ( 11 nsrn neatosadso that show and interactions strong in z in u otecnrbtosfrom contributions the to due , z to hudb iyadterecent the and tiny be should ction = ) 3 13 = ) ,tesi rnfro h ogtdnlpolar- longitudinal the of transfer spin the ], h rnvreplrzto fΛin Λ of polarization transverse the ] q 313Vlazn T) Italy (TN), Villazzano -38123 5 D uhvoain.I h polarized the In violations. such olsos[ collisions ,Sadn 502 China 250022, Shandong n, ainfntosb aigdecay taking by functions tation ,tesi lgmn fvco eos[ vector of alignment spin the ], , → n eae ra (ECT*) Areas Related and Br 1 h, 6 X q h .Teiopnsmer a ee been never has symmetry isospin The ]. dir dn 511 China 250101, ndong h j ( + ,h h, ( D z X 3, (MOE), n + ) 1 h,h q j § 24 ) nteuplrzdcs n write and case unpolarized the in 19 j n h-iWei Shu-yi and Z D ( – z esatwt h fragmenta- the with start We : – 36 1 h, ) dz 21 q , dec .TeBleeprmn has experiment Belle The ]. .Terslsotnbring often results The ]. ′ K ( 22 z h,h ) , , j 23 ( ,z z, ,adrltdphe- related and ], D ′ 4, ) 1 ⊥ 3 D q T ¶ Λ a efitted be can ] 1 h ( q j z pp/pA ( D .Ti is This ). z G 1 ⊥ ′ ) q T Λ , 1 Λ Lq ( e z + ( col- 14 is ) (2) (1) (3) z e − ), – 2

h h,dir where D1q(z) is the final FF; D1q (z) is the directly With the isospin symmetry for con- h,dec tributions, we have, similar to Eqs. (5)-(7), that produced part; D1q (z) is the decay contribution part, h,hj Λ,dir Λ,dir D1q (z) is that from the channel hj hX, Br(h,hj ) D (z)= D (z), (10) ′ → 1u 1d ∗ ∗ is the branch ratio and Kh,hj (z,z ) is the Kernel func- DΛ,Σ (z)= DΛ,Σ (z), (11) tion representing the probability for a hj with momentum 1u 1d fraction z′ to decay into a h with momentum fraction z. Σ0 Σ0 D1u (z)= D1d (z). (12) We limit ourselves to light flavors and consider J P = 0− pseudo-scalar and J P = 1− vector mesons, and From Eqs. (7) and (12), we obtain immediately that J P = (1/2)+ octet and J P = (3/2)+ decuplet . there is no contribution to isospin symmetry violation in There is also small contribution from even higher excited Λ production from Ω− ΛX or Σ0 Λγ because the → → resonance states [37]. We do not consider them because: decay process involved is the same for u Λ+ X and → (1) the production rates are very small. (2) most of them d Λ+ X. → decay via strong interaction so that the isospin symmetry For the contribution from the weak decay of Ξ, al- is held in such decay processes. We just include them in though there is a small isospin symmetry violation for Ξ Ξ0 Ξ− the directly produced part effectively. production, i.e., a difference between D1u (z) and D1d (z) The decay channels and the corresponding branch ra- as given by Eq. (8) due to the weak decay contribution tios can be found in the Review of Particle Properties [1]. from Ω−, it does not lead to isospin symmetry violation We analyze the situation for different hadrons one by one in the Λ production. This is because both Ξ0 and Ξ− in the following. contribute equally to Λ production via the weak decay (i) Ξ production: The situation for the pro- Ξ Λπ. Such a difference disappears in the Λ pro- → duction is simpler than that for mesons since it receives duction where the contributions from Ξ0 Λπ0 and → decay contributions only from heavier baryons. We start Ξ− Λπ− add together, i.e., we still obtain ∗ → with Ξ where we have decay contributions from Ξ and Λ Ξ Λ Ξ D , (z)= D , (z). (13) Ω−, i.e., 1u 1d

∗ − We conclude that the electroweak decays do not lead Ξi Ξi,dir Ξi,Ξ Ξi,Ω D1q (z)= D1q (z)+ D1q (z)+ D1q (z). (4) to isospin symmetry violation in Λ production and the isospin symmetry is valid in unpolarized FFs of Λ, i.e., Here we use i to specify one of the states and Ξi,Ξ∗ Ξi,Ξ∗j Λ Λ D (z) D (z) to denote the sum of con- D1u(z)= D1d(z). (14) 1q ≡ j 1q tributions ofP different charge states and similar in the We note in particular that this contradicts the parame- following of this paper. We take the isospin symmetry in terizations in e.g. [40] where significant isospin symmetry strong interaction processes, and obtain, violations are involved in FFs of Λ. 0 − (iii) Nucleon production: Nucleon receives the most de- DΞ ,dir(z)= DΞ ,dir(z), (5) 1u 1d cay contributions among all the different baryons. There ∗ − ∗ Ξ0,Ξ Ξ ,Ξ ± D1u (z)= D1d (z), (6) are weak decay contributions from Λ and Σ . Both of Ω− Ω− them lead to isospin symmetry violation. We denote it D (z)= D (z). (7) p 1u 1d by δDN D Dn , and obtain 1q ≡ 1u − 1d − The weak decay of Ω leads indeed to a small isospin N,Λ N,Σ δDN (z)= δD (z)+ δD (z), (15) symmetry violation of Ξ production given by 1q 1q 1q

− The corresponding decay branch ratio differences are [1] Ξ Ξ0 Ξ− Ξ,Ω δD1q(z) D1u (z) D1d (z)= δD1q (z) δBr(N, Λ)=0.281 and δBr(N, Σ) = 0.484. ≡ − − − production: − ′ ′ Ω ′ (iv) π Among all different hadrons, the = δBr(Ξ, Ω ) dz K − (z,z )D (z ), (8) Z Ξ,Ω 1u production of pions receives most decay contributions and the situation is most complicated. because there is a difference between the branch ra- Besides strong decays, we have contributions from elec- tios of Ω− Ξ0π− and Ω− Ξ−π0, δBr(Ξ, Ω−) troweak decays of the isospin singlet mesons ω, φ, η and → → ≡ Br(Ξ0, Ω−) Br(Ξ−, Ω−)=0.150 [1]. However, the ef- η′ and these isospin singlet decays do not lead to − fect is tiny because the total contribution from Ω− decay isospin symmetry violation for production. to Ξ in the final state is only a very small fraction. There is contribution to isospin symmetry violation (ii) Λ production: The Λ production receives contribu- from decays of . There are also decay contribu- tions from Ω−, Σ∗, Ξ and Σ0 decays, i.e., tions from baryons and anti-baryons. Among them, we

− ∗ have contributions to isospin symmetry violations from Λ Λ,dir Λ,Ω Λ,Σ − − D1q(z)=D1q (z)+ D1q (z)+ D1q (z) weak decays of Ω , Λ, Ξ , so that 0 Λ,Ξ Λ,Σ ¯ + D1q (z)+ D1q (z). (9) π π,K π,B π,B δD1q(z)= δD1q (z)+ δD1q (z)+ δD1q (z). (16) 3

(v) A rough estimate: We see that weak decay contri- isospin symmetry violation in polarized FFs of Λ produc- butions lead indeed to isospin symmetry violations in FFs tion. But the difference is not large, e.g., γ = 0.85 for for productions of hadrons such as Ξ, nucleon and pion. Ξ0 Λπ0 and is 0.89 for Ξ− Λπ−, leading to a dif- A precise calculation of such violations is, however, quite ference→ of 2δγ/3 0.027 in the→ spin transfer. Positivity involved and depends on FFs of different hadrons. We bounds demand that∼ the violation should be, in any case, Λ,Ξ make a rough estimate of magnitudes in the following. less than this factor times D1u (z). Having in mind that Λ,Ξ Λ We consider a system created in fragmentations of D1u (z) is only a small fraction of D1u(z), we conclude and anti-quarks. We assume equal numbers of that the isospin symmetry violation in the polarized FFs u and d but a suppression factor λ for s; and of Λ can only be a tiny effect. equal numbers of quarks and anti-quarks of the same fla- The fit to the Belle data: Now we just assume ⊥Λ vors. We assume isospin symmetry for directly produced the isospin symmetry for the polarized FF D1T q and hadrons but the same suppression λ for hadrons with a study whether we can describe the Belle data [3]. We . In this way, each hadron acquires a rel- use the Trento convention [38] for the transverse mo- ⊥Λ ative production weight and we calculate the ratios of mentum dependent FF D1T q(z,pT ) and take a factorized average yields in the final state as a guide of the magni- ⊥Λ ⊥Λ 1 2 2 form D1T q(z,pT ) = D1T q(z) π∆2 exp( pT /∆ ), where tudes of the isospin symmetry violations. the transverse momentum dependent part− is taken as a For Ξ and nucleon, we calculate the difference between Gaussian with a flavor independent width ∆. The Belle 0 − the average yields of Ξ and Ξ and that of and experiment measured the pT -integrated polarizations in . For Ξ, this is given by the inclusive process e+e− ΛX, where the transverse direction is defined with respect→ to the thrust axis, and δ NΞ / NΞ = ( N 0 N − )/( N 0 + N − ) h i h i h Ξ i − h Ξ i h Ξ i h Ξ i the associated process e+e− ΛhX, where h and Λ are 3 2 2 3 = (0.150λ γ)/[2λ + γ(2λ +0.322λ )], (17) in different hemispheres. They→ are given by

P + 2 ⊥Λ where γ is the relative production weight of J = (1/2) √π ∆ eqD1 (zΛ) P (z )= q T q , (18) to J P = (3/2)+ baryon. We take λ = 0.3 and γ = 0.3 Λ Λ P 2 Λ 2 zΛMΛ q eqD1q(zΛ) as obtained [37] by fitting the data available, and obtain P √π zh∆ δ NΞ / NΞ 0.005. Similarly, for nucleon, we obtain PΛ(zΛ,zh)= h i h i ≈ 2 2 2 2 2 δ NN / NN 0.026. Both are less than a few percent. zΛMΛ zh + zΛ∆h/∆ h Foriπh, wei≈ estimate the largest contribution from the p⊥Λ Λh D1T q(zΛ) decay by calculating the contribution of one pion R1q (zΛ,zh) Λ + (q q¯) , (19) × h D1 (zΛ) ↔ i from the kaon decay and the relative contribution from Xq q kaon decay to the production of pion. The former is given Λh respectively. Here R1q (zΛ,zh) is the relative weight of by the ratio δBr(π,K)/Br(π,K) = 0.26 [1] where the contribution from q ΛX andq ¯ hX. At the + + − 0 − δBr(π,K)= Br(π ,K ) Br(π ,K ) and Br(π,K)= leading order in pQCD, it→ is given by → Br(π+,K+) + Br(π−,K0−). For the latter, we obtain π+,K 2 Λ h Λh eqD1q(zΛ)D1¯q(zh) Nπ+ / Nπ+ 0.16 by taking the relative weight of R (z ,z )= . (20) h i h i ∼ 1q Λ h 2 Λ h ¯ vector to pseudo- β 1 and neglecting decay e D (zΛ)D ¯(zh) + (f f) f f 1f 1f ↔ contributions from baryons and∼ anti-baryons. Together P Λh this gives a violation of less than 5%. We see that R1q (zΛ,zh) is determined by unpolarized The Polarized FFs of Λ: We have shown that weak FFs. We calculate it by using different parameteriza- Pythia decays do not lead to isospin symmetry violation of unpo- tions [22, 39–42] and [43]. The results obtained larized FFs of Λ. For polarized FFs, we need to consider are slightly different from each other but the qualitative the spin transfer in the corresponding decay process. It features are the same. We show the results obtained us- is obvious that the decays of Ω− Λπ− and Σ0 Λγ ing DSV [22] for Λ and DHESS [41] for π in Fig. 1. do not lead to isospin symmetry→ violation in FFs→ of Λ From Fig. 1, we see clearly that there is a significant Λπ + − + production because they are the same for u Λ+ X difference between R1q (zΛ,zπ) in e e Λπ X and + − − → and d Λ+ X. → that in e e Λπ X. Such a difference is more obvious → → The only candidate for the violation is the contribu- at smaller zΛ but decreases with increasing zΛ. It is also tion from the weak decay Ξ Λπ. The spin transfer in obvious that such a difference might be the source for the → different behaviors of Λ polarizations in e+e− Λπ±X this decay process Ξ Λπ depends on the direction of → momentum of Λ in the→ rest frame of Ξ and is determined observed in the Belle experiment [3]. ⊥Λ ⊥Λ by the decay parameters. The average over all directions With the isospin symmetry for D1T q, we have D1T u = ⊥Λ ⊥Λ ⊥Λ is (1 + 2γ)/3. The decay parameters can be found in the D1Td and D1T u¯ = D1T d¯. However, since s contributes ⊥Λ Review of Particle Properties [1]. We see indeed some quite differently to the spin of Λ, we expect D1T s to be 0 0 ⊥Λ ⊥Λ differences between the decay parameters for Ξ Λπ quite different from D1T u = D1Td. At the Belle ener- and those for Ξ− Λπ−. Such differences lead→ to the gies [3], a significant contribution to Λ comes from c and → 4

0.6 0.05 0.4

0.2 -0.05

0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.6 -0.15 0.6

0.4 0.05

0.2

0 -0.05 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.6

+ − → -0.15 FIG. 1. The relative weight of different flavors in e e 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.6 ΛπX calculated with DSV [22] and DHESS [41] FFs.

FIG. 2. Transverse polarization of Λ in e+e− → Λh±X com- c¯ fragmentation (c.f. Fig. 1). The heavy quarks fragment pared with the Belle data [3]. quite differently from light quarks and the leading hadron contribution in c ΛX comes mainly from the decay 0 → ⊥Λ ⊥Λ Λc ΛX. We therefore expect that D1Tc and D1T c¯ can also→ be quite different from those of light quarks. -0.02 ⊥Λ -0.04 We parametrize D1T q(z) with the same form as that used in [5, 6], i.e., -0.06

αT q +βT q −1 -0.08 ⊥Λ (αT q + βT q 1) D1T q(z)=NT q − α −1 βT q (αT q 1) T q β -0.1 − T q 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 zαT q (1 z)βT q DΛ (z). (21) × − 1q + − The isospin symmetry ensures that NT q, αT q and βT q FIG. 3. Transverse polarization of Λ in e e → ΛX com- take the same values for q = u and d and forq ¯ =u ¯ pared with the Belle data [3]. and d¯. For other quarks and antiquarks, they are just free parameters to be extracted with a χ2-analysis to the Belle data [3]. The χ2 finds its minimum with the set of we also see that there are significant differences between values for the free parameters listed in Table I. We show the parameters extracted with DSV+DHESS unpolar- our results of the transverse polarization of Λ compared ized FFs [22, 41, 42] and those with Pythia [43]. This with the Belle data [3] in Figs. 2 and 3. shows the uncertainties in unpolarized FFs have also From Figs. 2 and 3, we see that the Belle data [3] are quite large influences on the results of Λ polarizations. well described under the constraint of isospin symme- The data available [3] are still far from enough to deter- try for the corresponding polarized FFs. Furthermore, mine the corresponding polarized FFs accurately. There is no need to introduce significant isospin symmetry vio- lation in FFs at this stage. TABLE I. Values of parameters extracted with a χ2-analysis Summary and outlook: We made a systematic to the Belle data [3]. The first and second rows present the study of the isospin symmetry of FFs by taking reso- results with inputs of unpolarized FFs from DSV+DHESS nance decays into account. The results show that there unpolarized FFs [22, 41, 42] and Pythia [43] respectively. 2 2 is no reason to introduce significant isospin symmetry The corresponding values of ∆ /∆h are 0.951 and 0.939. violation in FFs if we assume that isospin symmetry is parameter u, d s c u,¯ d¯ s¯ c¯ valid in strong interactions. We see in particular that the

∆ 0.391 −0.391 0.0278 −0.456 −0.430 0.401 isospin symmetry is expected to be valid in unpolarized NT q MΛ 0.245 −0.148 0.108 −0.231 0.523 −0.324 FFs for Λ hyperon production and in the polarized case 1.38 6.91 1.43 1.00 2.64 11.6 there can only be a tiny violation due to the contribution αq 2.41 1.54 5.14 1.86 1.74 1.02 from Ξ Λπ. We demonstrated that, in contrast with the recent→ parameterizations [5, 6], the Belle data [3] on 3.98 0.646 14.3 0.0319 2.77 14.9 βq the transverse polarization of Λ can also be well described 7.69 0.551 15.0 2.35 14.9 2.41 without isospin symmetry violation in the parameteriza- 5 tion of corresponding FFs. Polarization In 16-gev/c pi-p Interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 313 (1983). The results demand that isospin symmetry violation [10] S. A. Gourlay et al., “Polarization of Λ′s and Λ-primes¯ in should be dealt with carefully in parameterizing FFs. In pp,pp ¯ , and K−p Interactions at 176-GeV/c,” Phys. Rev. particular for Λ production, we need to take it as granted Lett. 56, 2244 (1986). in unpolarized FFs. In the polarized case, we may include [11] For a recent review, see e.g., A. D. Krisch, “Hard colli- a tiny violation due to the contribution from Ξ decays sions of spinning protons: Past, present and future,” Eur. 31 with an upper limit of a few percent of the contribution Phys. J. A , 417 (2007). from the Ξ decay to the unpolarized FF. [12] D. Buskulic et al. [ALEPH Collaboration], “Measure- ment of Lambda polarization from Z decays,” Phys. Lett. Acknowledgements: This work was supported in B 374, 319 (1996). part by the National Natural Science Foundation of [13] K. Ackerstaff et al. [OPAL Collaboration], “Polarization China (approval Nos. 11890713, 1205122, 11890710, and forward - backward of Lambda baryons 2 11947055, 11505080) and Shandong Province Natural in hadronic Z0 decays,” Eur. Phys. J. C , 49 (1998) [hep-ex/9708027]. Science Foundation Grant Nos. ZR2018JL006 and [14] P. Abreu et al. [DELPHI Collaboration], “Measurement ZR2020QA082. of the spin density matrix for the rho0, K*0 (892) and phi produced in Z0 decays,” Phys. Lett. B 406, 271 (1997). doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00758-2 [15] K. Ackerstaff et al. [OPAL Collaboration], “Spin align- ment of leading K*(892)0 mesons in hadronic Z0 de- ∗ [email protected] cays,” Phys. Lett. B 412, 210 (1997) doi:10.1016/S0370- † [email protected] 2693(97)01077-0 [hep-ex/9708022]. ‡ [email protected] [16] G. Abbiendi et al. [OPAL Collaboration], “A Study of § sps [email protected] spin alignment of rho(770)+- and omega(782) mesons ¶ [email protected] in hadronic Z0 decays,” Eur. Phys. J. C 16, 61 (2000) [1] P. A. Zyla et al. [], “Review of doi:10.1007/s100520050003 [hep-ex/9906043]. ,” PTEP 2020, no. 8, 083C01 (2020). [17] K. Ackerstaff et al. [OPAL Collaboration], “Study of phi doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaa104 (1020), D*+- and B* spin alignment in hadronic Z0 de- [2] For recent reviews, see e.g., S. Albino, “The Hadroniza- cays,” Z. Phys. C 74, 437 (1997). tion of partons,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2489 (2010) [18] A. Chukanov et al. [NOMAD Collaboration], “Produc- doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2489 [arXiv:0810.4255 tion properties of K*(892)+- vector mesons and their [hep-ph]]; A. Metz and A. Vossen, “Parton Frag- spin alignment as measured in the NOMAD experiment,” mentation Functions,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 91, 136 Eur. Phys. J. C 46, 69 (2006) doi:10.1140/EPJC/S2006- (2016) doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.08.003 [arXiv:1607.02521 02500-4 [hep-ex/0604050]. [hep-ex]]. [19] L. Adamczyk et al. [STAR Collaboration], “Global Λ [3] Y. Guan et al. [Belle Collaboration], “Observation of hyperon polarization in nuclear collisions: evidence Transverse Λ/Λ¯ Hyperon Polarization in e+e− Annihila- for the most vortical fluid,” Nature 548, 62 (2017). tion at Belle,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, no. 4, 042001 (2019) doi:10.1038/nature23004. [arXiv:1701.06657 [nucl-ex]]. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.042001 [arXiv:1808.05000 [20] Z. T. Liang and X. N. Wang, “Globally polarized quark- [hep-ex]]. plasma in non-central A+A collisions,” Phys. Rev. [4] M. Anselmino, R. Kishore and A. Mukherjee, “Po- Lett. 94, 102301 (2005) [erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. larizing fragmentation function and the Lambda po- 96, 039901 (2006)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.102301 larization in e+e− processes,” Phys. Rev. D 100, [arXiv:nucl-th/0410079 [nucl-th]]. no. 1, 014029 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.014029 [21] J. H. Gao, Z. T. Liang, Q. Wang and X. N. Wang, [arXiv:1905.02777 [hep-ph]]. “Global polarization effect and spin-orbit coupling in [5] U. D’Alesio, F. Murgia and M. Zaccheddu, “First strong interaction,” [arXiv:2009.04803 [nucl-th]]. extraction of the Λ polarizing fragmentation func- [22] D. de Florian, M. Stratmann and W. Vogelsang, “QCD tion from Belle e+e− data,” Phys. Rev. D 102, analysis of unpolarized and polarized no. 5, 054001 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.054001 production in leading and next-to-leading order,” Phys. [arXiv:2003.01128 [hep-ph]]. Rev. D 57, 5811 (1998) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.57.5811 [6] D. Callos, Z. B. Kang and J. Terry, “Extract- [hep-ph/9711387]. Here, only FFs of q → Λ/Λ¯ are given. ing the transverse momentum dependent polariz- In our numerical calculations presented in this paper 102 Λ ing fragmentation functions,” Phys. Rev. D , where unpolarized FFs of Λ are used, we take Dq/q¯(z)= no. 9, 096007 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.096007 Λ/Λ¯ (1 ± z)Dq (z)/2. [arXiv:2003.04828 [hep-ph]]. [23] K. b. Chen, W. h. Yang, Y. j. Zhou and Z. t. Liang, “En- [7] A. Lesnik et al., “Observation of a Difference Between ergy dependence of hadron polarization in e+e− → hX Polarization and Analyzing Power in Lambda0 Produc- at high energies,” Phys. Rev. D 95, no. 3, 034009 (2017) tion with 6-GeV/c Polarized Protons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.034009 [arXiv:1609.07001 35 , 770 (1975). [hep-ph]]. [8] G. Bunce et al., “Lambda0 Hyperon Polarization in In- [24] G. Gustafson and J. Hakkinen, “Lambda polarization in clusive Production by 300-GeV Protons on Beryllium.,” e+ e- annihilation at the Z0 pole,” Phys. Lett. B 303, 36 Phys. Rev. Lett. , 1113 (1976). 350 (1993). [9] J. Bensinger et al., “Inclusive Lambda Production And 6

[25] Z. t. Liang and C. Boros, “Hyperon polarization and sin- 737 (2013) [arXiv:1310.2005 [hep-ph]]. gle spin left-right asymmetry in inclusive production pro- [36] J. R. Ellis, A. Kotzinian and D. V. Naumov, “Intrinsic cesses at high-energies,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3608 (1997) polarized strangeness and Lambda0 polarization in deep doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3608 [hep-ph/9708488]. inelastic production,” Eur. Phys. J. C 25, 603 (2002) [26] H. Dong and Z. t. Liang, “Hyperon polarization in [hep-ph/0204206]. different inclusive production processes in unpolar- [37] W. Hofmann, “Particle Composition in Hadronic Jets in ized high-energy hadron hadron collisions,” Phys. Rev. e+e− Annihilation,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 38, 279 D 70, 014019 (2004) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.014019 (1988). doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.38.120188.001431 [arXiv:hep-ph/0403041 [hep-ph]]. [38] A. Bacchetta, U. D’Alesio, M. Diehl and [27] Y. Yang, Z. Lu and I. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. D 96, C. A. Miller, “Single-spin : The no. 3, 034010 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.034010 Trento conventions,” Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004), [arXiv:1706.03355 [hep-ph]]. 117504 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.117504 [arXiv:hep- [28] C. Boros and Z. -t. Liang, “Spin content of Lambda ph/0410050 [hep-ph]]. and its longitudinal polarization in e+ e- annihilation [39] D. de Florian, R. Sassot and M. Stratmann, “Global at high-energies,” Phys. Rev. D 57, 4491 (1998) [hep- analysis of fragmentation functions for pions and ph/9803225]. kaons and their uncertainties,” Phys. Rev. D 75, [29] C. -x. Liu and Z. -t. Liang, “Spin structure and lon- 114010 (2007) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.114010 [hep- gitudinal polarization of hyperon in e+ e- annihilation ph/0703242 [HEP-PH]]. at high-energies,” Phys. Rev. D 62, 094001 (2000) [hep- [40] S. Albino, B. A. Kniehl and G. Kramer, “AKK Up- ph/0005172]. date: Improvements from New Theoretical Input and [30] C. -x. Liu, Q. -h. Xu and Z. -t. Liang, “Hyperon polariza- Experimental Data,” Nucl. Phys. B 803, 42 (2008) tion in semiinclusive deeply inelastic nucleon scat- doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.05.017 [arXiv:0803.2768 tering at high-energy,” Phys. Rev. D 64, 073004 (2001) [hep-ph]]. [hep-ph/0106184]. [41] D. de Florian, R. Sassot, M. Epele, R. J. Hern´andez- [31] Z. -t. Liang and C. -x. Liu, “Hyperon polarization in Pinto and M. Stratmann, “Parton-to-Pion Fragmenta- mu charged current interaction at NOMAD en- tion Reloaded,” Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) no.1, 014035 ergies,” Phys. Rev. D 66, 057302 (2002). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.014035 [arXiv:1410.6027 [hep- [32] Q. -h. Xu, C. -x. Liu and Z. -t. Liang, “Longitudinal po- ph]]. larization of hyperons in high p(T) jets in singly polarized [42] D. de Florian, M. Epele, R. Hernandez-Pinto, R. Sassot pp collisions at high-energies,” Phys. Rev. D 65, 114008 and M. Stratmann, “Parton-to-Kaon Fragmentation (2002) [hep-ph/0204318]. Revisited,” Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) no.9, 094019 [33] B. Q. Ma and J. Soffer, “Quark flavor separation in doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.094019 [arXiv:1702.06353 Lambda Baryon fragmentation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, [hep-ph]]. 2250 (1999) [hep-ph/9810517]. [43] T. Sjostrand, P. Eden, C. Friberg, L. Lonnblad, G. Miu, [34] B. Q. Ma, I. Schmidt, J. Soffer and J. J. Yang, “Lambda, S. Mrenna and E. Norrbin, “High-energy physics event anti-Lambda polarization and spin transfer in lepton generation with PYTHIA 6.1,” Comput. Phys. Com- deep inelastic scattering,” Eur. Phys. J. C 16, 657 (2000) mun. 135, 238 (2001) doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(00)00236- [hep-ph/0001259]. 8 [hep-ph/0010017]. [35] Y. Chi and B. Q. Ma, “Quark to Λ-hyperon spin transfers in the current-fragmentation region,” Phys. Lett. B 726,