<<

An Internet Book on

Flow around a Sphere at High

For steady flows about a sphere in which dUi/dt = dVi/dt = dWi/dt =0,itisconvenienttouseacoordinate system, xi, fixed in the particle as well as polar coordinates (r, θ) and velocities ur,uθ as defined in figure 1.

Then equations (Nea1) and (Nea2) become

1 ∂ 2 1 ∂ (r ur)+ (uθ sin θ)=0 (Neb1) r2 ∂r r sin θ ∂θ and   ∂u ∂u u ∂u u2 ∂p ρ r u r θ r − θ − C ∂t + r ∂r + r ∂θ r = ∂r       1 ∂ 2 ∂ur 1 ∂ ∂ur 2ur 2 ∂uθ +ρC νC r + sin θ − − (Neb2) r2 ∂r ∂r r2 sin θ ∂θ ∂θ r2 r2 ∂θ   ∂u ∂u u ∂u u u ∂p ρ θ u θ θ θ r θ − 1 C ∂t + r ∂r + r ∂θ + r = r ∂θ       1 ∂ 2 ∂uθ 1 ∂ ∂uθ 2 ∂ur uθ +ρC νC r + sin θ + − (Neb3) r2 ∂r ∂r r2 sin θ ∂θ ∂θ r2 ∂θ r2 sin2 θ The Stokes streamfunction, ψ, is defined to satisfy continuity automatically: 1 ∂ψ 1 ∂ψ ur = ; uθ = − (Neb4) r2 sin θ ∂θ r sin θ ∂r and the inviscid potential flow solution is Wr2 D ψ = − sin2 θ − sin2 θ (Neb5) 2 r 2D ur = −W cos θ − cos θ (Neb6) r3 D uθ =+W sin θ − sin θ (Neb7) r3

Figure 1: Notation for a spherical particle. Figure 2: Smoke visualization of the nominally steady flows (from left to right) past a sphere showing, at the top, laminar separation at Re =2.8 × 105 and, on the bottom, turbulent separation at Re =3.9 × 105. Photographs by F.N.M.Brown, reproduced with the permission of the University of Notre Dame.

D φ = −Wrcos θ + cos θ (Neb8) r2 3 where, because of the boundary condition (ur)r=R = 0, it follows that D = −WR /2. In potential flow one may also define a velocity potential, φ, such that ui = ∂φ/∂xi. The classic problem with such solutions is the fact that the is zero, a circumstance termed D’Alembert’s paradox. The flow is symmetric about the x2x3 plane through the origin and there is no .

The real viscous flows around a sphere at large Reynolds numbers, Re =2WR/νC > 1, are well docu- 3 5 ∼ ◦ mented. In the range from about 10 to 3 × 10 , laminar separation occurs at θ = 84 and a large wake is formed behind the sphere (see figure 2). Close to the sphere the near-wake is laminar; further downstream transition and turbulence occurring in the shear layers spreads to generate a turbulent far-wake. As the Reynolds number increases the shear layer transition moves forward until, quite abruptly, the turbulent shear layer reattaches to the body, resulting in a major change in the final position of sep- ∼ ◦ aration (θ = 120 ) and in the form of the turbulent wake (figure 2). Associated with this change in flow pattern is a dramatic decrease in the drag coefficient, CD (defined as the drag force on the body in the x 1 ρ W 2πR2 . negative 1 direction divided by 2 C ), from a value of about 0 5 in the laminar separation regime to a value of about 0.2 in the turbulent separation regime (figure 3). At values of Re less than about 103 the flow becomes quite unsteady with periodic shedding of vortices from the sphere. Figure 3: Drag coefficient on a sphere as a function of Reynolds number. Dashed curves indicate the drag crisis regime in which the drag is very sensitive to other factors such as the free stream turbulence.