Damot Gale, Wolayta)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Damot Gale, Wolayta) Institut National French Center of Inter Aide Centre National Agronomique Ethiopian Studies France d’Etudes Agronomiques Paris-Grignon Addis Abeba Paris Des Régions Chaudes Montpellier Agricultural and economic analysis-diagnosis of Obe Jage (Damot Gale, Wolayta) Elodie Le Gal , for obtaining the DIPLOMA OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING (Master’s degree) from the Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon (INA P-G) Nicolas Molinier , for obtaining the DIPLOMA OF TROPICAL AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING from the CNEARC Supervising professor : Hubert COCHET, Mireille DOSSO Training supervisor : Damien Du Portal October 2006 The study region : localisation N Awash N Nazaret Volcan Damota Shashamane Sodo Arba Minch 100 km Acknoledgements First of all, we want to thank all the farmers of Obe Jage and their families. With patience, they explained us their daily work. This report is almost completely based on their knowledge. They also welcomed us warmly, providing us an unforgettable personal experience. A wink to all their children who enlivened a lot the long interviews! We could not forget our valuable translator Damsee who worked with us during the whole period of the training. Thanks to his translating skills he made the research much easier for us, being given our level in Wolaytinia!! He kept on being available even if we worked a lot! Keing gallatos ! Ant tosimo à Arba, a strong walker who gave us a precious help even if he had a lot of problems ! In Addis Ababa, we thank the French Center of Ethiopian Studies (CFEE) and its director Gérard Prunier, who supported us for this work and during our stay in Addis Ababa. We also would like to thank all the members of the Inter Aide staff who guided and helped us always smiling! It was a big sun in our long rainy days of work in Sodo! Getu and all his family, Gesareyn, Toffic, Pedros, Makasha, Christophe, Agnès, Mengistu and Negusse, Damien, François, Philipe... We are grateful to Hubert Cochet (INA P-G) and Mireille Dosso (CNEARC), our supervising professor, and also to other professors who gave us valuable suggestions for this report. E. Le Gal, N. Molinier – Analysis diagnosis, region of Wolayta/Damot Gale 1 Introduction....................................................................................................................... 1 1 General framework of the study ............................................................................... 4 1.1 Institutional context .......................................................................................... 4 1.1.1 Presentation of Inter Aide’s activities....................................................... 4 1.1.2 The demand : origin, transformation ........................................................ 4 1.2 Méthodology..................................................................................................... 5 1.2.1 The agrarian diagnosis.............................................................................. 5 1.2.2 Complementary study............................................................................... 6 1.2.3 The main difficulties we met .................................................................... 6 1.3 General presentation of the study region .......................................................... 7 1.3.1 Location of the study region..................................................................... 7 1.3.2 Bio-physical characteristics of the study region ....................................... 9 1.3.3 Socio-économic characteristics of the study region ............................... 11 1.3.4 Farming activities and trade.................................................................... 12 2 Recent evolutions of agriculture in the study region .............................................. 17 2.1 Introduction..................................................................................................... 17 2.2 The second reign of the negus Hailé Selassie : an agrarian system built on a feudal society (1941-1974) ......................................................................................... 18 2.2.1 The agrarian landscape ........................................................................... 18 2.2.2 Social relationships................................................................................. 20 2.2.3 Livestock farming and cropping systems ............................................... 21 2.2.4 Farm typology at the end of the 60’s...................................................... 24 2.3 The socialist regime (1974-1991)................................................................... 24 2.3.1 The agrarian reform and its consequences.............................................. 24 2.3.2 The intensification of the regime (1980-1991) ....................................... 29 2.4 The liberal era (1991- today) .......................................................................... 31 2.4.1 The market liberalization........................................................................ 31 2.4.2 Extention programs : Sasakawa/Global 2000......................................... 32 2.4.3 A new work intensification..................................................................... 33 2.4.4 Development of off-farm work and temporary migrations..................... 34 3 The present agrarian system.................................................................................... 37 3.1 Access to means of production....................................................................... 37 3.1.1 The land .................................................................................................. 37 3.1.2 The workforce......................................................................................... 38 3.1.3 The capital............................................................................................... 38 3.2 Cropping system, livestock farming system and management of the fertility 38 3.2.1 The cropping systems ............................................................................. 39 3.2.2 The livestock farming systems ............................................................... 60 3.2.3 A close association between agriculture and breeding ........................... 66 3.3 Farm typology................................................................................................. 70 3.4 Economic results and analysis ........................................................................ 88 3.4.1 Study of the Net Added Value (NAV) and of the farm family income per agricultural labourer................................................................................................ 88 3.4.2 The contribution of off-farm incomes .................................................... 90 3.4.3 The impact of the SAFETYNET program.............................................. 90 4 Conclusions discussions ......................................................................................... 93 Appendix……………………………………………………………………………….96 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………..109 E. Le Gal, N. Molinier – Analysis diagnosis, region of Wolayta/Damot Gale 2 INTRODUCTION The Wolayta is a little montaneous area from the south west of ethiopia, located on the occidental edge of the great rift valley. It was dubbed “ethiopian balkans”, owing to its strong cultural and ethnic identity. This area is overcrowded (450 inhabitants/km²) and agricultural (92% of the working population works in agriculture and the total utilised farm area represent 90% of the territory). The enset cropping gives it a stiking geographic originality (Wolayta belongs indeed to the “enset area” (Steven, 1997, quoted by N. Barthès and V. Boquien, 2005)). Enset (Ensete Ventricosum), considered as a “miracle plant” (Gascon, 1991) is a false banana tree. The pulp extracted from the “pseudo tronc” gives a fermented paste with a high rate of carbohydrates. However, if this plant makes it possible to explain that the wolayta peasants succeeded to resist many severe drougt and famines (significant high-calorie production per unit of area, plant resistance to the climatic hazards), nowardays, it is not enough anymore to ensure the feed security for most of them. The wolayta is thus from now on dubbed “the green famine’s land”. In this context of chronical food shortage intervenes the NGO (Non Governemental Organization) Inter Aide. The aim of our study is to provide keys to better understand the situation and to contribute to the impact assessment of Inter Aide’s actions, on running since three years in our study area. Working on the recent evolutions and transformations of the agrarian system, we will attempt to explain the remaining of the “peasantry” in a context of agricultural crisis, begun a few decades ago. With this study, we will analyze the Inter Aide projects results, and then we will suggest evolution prospects in terms of agricultural development for this little area. E. Le Gal, N. Molinier – Analysis diagnosis, region of Wolayta/Damot Gale 3 1 GENERAL FRAMEWORK OF THE STUDY 1.1 INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT 1.1.1 Presentation of Inter Aide’s activities Our study occurs within the framework of a project entitled “Preservation of farm resources and improvement of food security for the vulnerable rural families of Damot Gale and Kacha Bira – SNNPR, Ethiopia” started in 2005. In the woreda of Damot Gale, this project prolongs two year of agricultural support started by Inter Aide in 2003 and primarily centered on the erosion control. Inter Aide is the only
Recommended publications
  • The Case of Damot Gale District in Wolaita Zone, Ethiopia) Zegeye Paulos Borko* Department of Economics, Wolaita Sodo University, PO Box 138, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
    onomic c s & f E o M Borko, Int J Econ Manag Sci 2017, 6:5 l a a n n a r g u e DOI: 10.4172/2162-6359.1000450 o m J International Journal of Economics & e l n a t n S o i c t i a ISSN: 2162-6359 e n n r c e t e s n I Management Sciences Research Article Research Article Open Access Child Labor and Associated Problems (The Case of Damot Gale District in Wolaita Zone, Ethiopia) Zegeye Paulos Borko* Department of Economics, Wolaita Sodo University, PO Box 138, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia Abstract The study was carried out at Damot Gale district of Wolaita zone in Southern nation nationalities regional state with the main objectives to describe factors of child labor in the study area. In order to attain this objective the study made use of cross-sectional household survey data collected from 94 sample households. The data collected were analyzed and discussed by using both descriptive statistics and binary logit regression model. To this end, identifying children’s who were in child labor and those who were not in child labor; descriptive result shows that from different age category 73% of the children’s were engaged in different activity and the remaining 27% responded as they were not working. Most children’s started working below the age of 8 and major sectors of work were unpaid family work such as agriculture 58% Male and 7.24% Female and Home service 7.3% Female and 22% male. The result of the logistic regression model revealed that out of 8 variables included in the model, 4 explanatory variables were found to be significant at 1%, 5% and 10% level.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Round 6 SDP Questionnaire
    Ethiopia Round 6 SDP Questionnaire Always 001a. Your name: [NAME] Is this your name? ◯ Yes ◯ No 001b. Enter your name below. 001a = 0 Please record your name 002a = 0 Day: 002b. Record the correct date and time. Month: Year: ◯ TIGRAY ◯ AFAR ◯ AMHARA ◯ OROMIYA ◯ SOMALIE BENISHANGUL GUMZ 003a. Region ◯ ◯ S.N.N.P ◯ GAMBELA ◯ HARARI ◯ ADDIS ABABA ◯ DIRE DAWA filter_list=${this_country} ◯ NORTH WEST TIGRAY ◯ CENTRAL TIGRAY ◯ EASTERN TIGRAY ◯ SOUTHERN TIGRAY ◯ WESTERN TIGRAY ◯ MEKELE TOWN SPECIAL ◯ ZONE 1 ◯ ZONE 2 ◯ ZONE 3 ZONE 5 003b. Zone ◯ ◯ NORTH GONDAR ◯ SOUTH GONDAR ◯ NORTH WELLO ◯ SOUTH WELLO ◯ NORTH SHEWA ◯ EAST GOJAM ◯ WEST GOJAM ◯ WAG HIMRA ◯ AWI ◯ OROMIYA 1 ◯ BAHIR DAR SPECIAL ◯ WEST WELLEGA ◯ EAST WELLEGA ◯ ILU ABA BORA ◯ JIMMA ◯ WEST SHEWA ◯ NORTH SHEWA ◯ EAST SHEWA ◯ ARSI ◯ WEST HARARGE ◯ EAST HARARGE ◯ BALE ◯ SOUTH WEST SHEWA ◯ GUJI ◯ ADAMA SPECIAL ◯ WEST ARSI ◯ KELEM WELLEGA ◯ HORO GUDRU WELLEGA ◯ Shinile ◯ Jijiga ◯ Liben ◯ METEKEL ◯ ASOSA ◯ PAWE SPECIAL ◯ GURAGE ◯ HADIYA ◯ KEMBATA TIBARO ◯ SIDAMA ◯ GEDEO ◯ WOLAYITA ◯ SOUTH OMO ◯ SHEKA ◯ KEFA ◯ GAMO GOFA ◯ BENCH MAJI ◯ AMARO SPECIAL ◯ DAWURO ◯ SILTIE ◯ ALABA SPECIAL ◯ HAWASSA CITY ADMINISTRATION ◯ AGNEWAK ◯ MEJENGER ◯ HARARI ◯ AKAKI KALITY ◯ NEFAS SILK-LAFTO ◯ KOLFE KERANIYO 2 ◯ GULELE ◯ LIDETA ◯ KIRKOS-SUB CITY ◯ ARADA ◯ ADDIS KETEMA ◯ YEKA ◯ BOLE ◯ DIRE DAWA filter_list=${level1} ◯ TAHTAY ADIYABO ◯ MEDEBAY ZANA ◯ TSELEMTI ◯ SHIRE ENIDASILASE/TOWN/ ◯ AHIFEROM ◯ ADWA ◯ TAHTAY MAYCHEW ◯ NADER ADET ◯ DEGUA TEMBEN ◯ ABIYI ADI/TOWN/ ◯ ADWA/TOWN/ ◯ AXUM/TOWN/ ◯ SAESI TSADAMBA ◯ KLITE
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA: FOOD Emergency Appeal N° MDRET005 GLIDE N° DR-2008-000043-ETH
    ETHIOPIA: FOOD Emergency appeal n° MDRET005 GLIDE n° DR-2008-000043-ETH INSECURITY 19 August 2008 This revised Appeal seeks CHF 8,157,607 (USD 7,920,006 or EUR 5,035,560) in cash, kind or services to support the Ethiopian Red Cross Society (ERCS) to assist 76,075 beneficiaries for 6 months. CHF 300,000 (USD 288,462 or EUR 187,500) was allocated from the Federation’s Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) to support this operation. Unearmarked funds to replenish DREF are encouraged. Furthermore, this emergency operation has received bilateral contributions from ECHO, through Finnish Red Cross and Austrian Red Cross (EUR 2.7 mill) and the Austrian Development Agency (EUR 200,000). Photo Above: Food distribution in process Based on the situation, this revised appeal responds to a request from ERCS to include the population of neighbouring Damot Gale who live under the same precarious situation as the population of Damot Pulasa and to provide support to 15,215 (7,200 in Damot Gale and 8,015 households in Damot Pulasa) with the total beneficiary of 76,075 (36,000 in Damot Gale and 40,075 in Damot Pulasa). This revised appeal is intended to address emergency food and relief assistance, early recovery activities as well as improving access to safe water and hygiene promotion. This operation is expected to be implemented over 6 months time The first two months’ emergency relief assistance have already been distributed in June and July 2008 in Damot Pulasa while distribution in Damot Gale is expected to start in August 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Demography and Health
    SNNPR Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples Demography and Health Aynalem Adugna, July 2014 www.EthioDemographyAndHealth.Org 2 SNNPR is one of the largest regions in Ethiopia, accounting for more than 10 percent of the country’s land area [1]. The mid-2008 population is estimated at nearly 16,000,000; almost a fifth of the country’s population. With less than one in tenth of its population (8.9%) living in urban areas in 2008 the region is overwhelmingly rural. "The region is divided into 13 administrative zones, 133 Woredas and 3512 Kebeles, and its capital is Awassa." [1] "The SNNPR is an extremely ethnically diverse region of Ethiopia, inhabited by more than 80 ethnic groups, of which over 45 (or 56 percent) are indigenous to the region (CSA 1996). These ethnic groups are distinguished by different languages, cultures, and socioeconomic organizations. Although none of the indigenous ethnic groups dominates the ethnic makeup of the national population, there is a considerable ethnic imbalance within the region. The largest ethnic groups in the SNNPR are the Sidama (17.6 percent), Wolayta (11.7 percent), Gurage (8.8 percent), Hadiya (8.4 percent), Selite (7.1 percent), Gamo (6.7 percent), Keffa (5.3 percent), Gedeo (4.4 percent), and Kembata (4.3 percent) …. While the Sidama are the largest ethnic group in the region, each ethnic group is numerically dominant in its respective administrative zone, and there are large minority ethnic groups in each zone. The languages spoken in the SNNPR can be classified into four linguistic families: Cushitic, Nilotic, Omotic, and Semitic.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: Administrative Map (August 2017)
    Ethiopia: Administrative map (August 2017) ERITREA National capital P Erob Tahtay Adiyabo Regional capital Gulomekeda Laelay Adiyabo Mereb Leke Ahferom Red Sea Humera Adigrat ! ! Dalul ! Adwa Ganta Afeshum Aksum Saesie Tsaedaemba Shire Indasilase ! Zonal Capital ! North West TigrayTahtay KoraroTahtay Maychew Eastern Tigray Kafta Humera Laelay Maychew Werei Leke TIGRAY Asgede Tsimbila Central Tigray Hawzen Medebay Zana Koneba Naeder Adet Berahile Region boundary Atsbi Wenberta Western Tigray Kelete Awelallo Welkait Kola Temben Tselemti Degua Temben Mekele Zone boundary Tanqua Abergele P Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Tsegede Tselemt Mekele Town Special Enderta Afdera Addi Arekay South East Ab Ala Tsegede Mirab Armacho Beyeda Woreda boundary Debark Erebti SUDAN Hintalo Wejirat Saharti Samre Tach Armacho Abergele Sanja ! Dabat Janamora Megale Bidu Alaje Sahla Addis Ababa Ziquala Maychew ! Wegera Metema Lay Armacho Wag Himra Endamehoni Raya Azebo North Gondar Gonder ! Sekota Teru Afar Chilga Southern Tigray Gonder City Adm. Yalo East Belesa Ofla West Belesa Kurri Dehana Dembia Gonder Zuria Alamata Gaz Gibla Zone 4 (Fantana Rasu ) Elidar Amhara Gelegu Quara ! Takusa Ebenat Gulina Bugna Awra Libo Kemkem Kobo Gidan Lasta Benishangul Gumuz North Wello AFAR Alfa Zone 1(Awsi Rasu) Debre Tabor Ewa ! Fogera Farta Lay Gayint Semera Meket Guba Lafto DPubti DJIBOUTI Jawi South Gondar Dire Dawa Semen Achefer East Esite Chifra Bahir Dar Wadla Delanta Habru Asayita P Tach Gayint ! Bahir Dar City Adm. Aysaita Guba AMHARA Dera Ambasel Debub Achefer Bahirdar Zuria Dawunt Worebabu Gambela Dangura West Esite Gulf of Aden Mecha Adaa'r Mile Pawe Special Simada Thehulederie Kutaber Dangila Yilmana Densa Afambo Mekdela Tenta Awi Dessie Bati Hulet Ej Enese ! Hareri Sayint Dessie City Adm.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: SNNP Region Administrative Map (As of 15 Aug 2017)
    Ethiopia: SNNP region administrative map (as of 15 Aug 2017) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Suten ! ! ! ! ! ! Inge Sodo ! ! !Bui ! ! WelikiteKebena Abeshege ! Kokir Gedbano ! ! Kela ! ! Muhur Na Ak!lil ! Gubire ! ! ! Cheha Agena ! Imdibir! ! Ezha Me!skan ! ! Inseno ! Gonichire ! ! ! Kibet Qewaqoto! Koshe ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Enemorina Eaner Alicho Woriro ! Gumer Mareko ! Selti ! ! Areket Alkeso town ! ! ! ! ! ! Geta Kose Tora ! Fofa ! Werabe ! ! ! Dinkela ! ! Sayilem! ! ! ! ! Yadota Geja Endiguagn Yem SP Woreda ! Dalocha ! Misrak Azenet Berbere ! ! ! ! Misha !LERA Dalocha Masha ! Wilb!areg Gibe ! ! Mierab Azenet Berbere ! ! Lanfero ! Homec!ho ! ! Fonqo town ! Mito ! GAMBELA Gesha (Deka) Kondo GECHA TOWN ! Analemmo ! ! !Deka ! Doesha !Belesa town ! Alem Gebeya Anderacha Getawa Gembora ! ! Limu ! ! Bonosha Sankura ! ! ! Lisana town Jajira Shashogo Gimbichu! ! Hufa ! ! ! Diri Soro ! Gojeb Bita (Big) Gimbo Doya Gena Jacho A!nigach!a ! Alaba SP Woreda ! ! ! Daniboya Wishiwishi Dune Kulito ! Kaka Idget ! Bita Genet ! OROMIA Kelata Mudula Hobichaka ! ! Bonga ! ! ! ! ! Yeki ! Menjiwo ! Chena Tembaro Ke!diada Gambela TEPI TOWN Hadero !TubitoKacha Bira ! ! ! !Adilo Chda Idge T!unito ! Legend WACHA ! ! Terche Misrak Badawacho ! Gena Bosa Chiri BOMIBE 01 ! ! ! ! !Karewo ! Mierab Badawacho ! Ameya P ! Tocha Tocha Edget Boloso Bombe Sheka Tulo ! Regional capital ! Waka ! Semen Bench Alem Gena ! ! ! ! Mehal Sheko Mareka Boloso SoreDamot Pulasa Hawassa Zuria PWondo-Ge! net Gesa ! ! Shanito Hawasa Town ! ! ! ! Shama Chuko Shay Bench ! Bitena Town Mizan Aman ! ! Tula ! Damot
    [Show full text]
  • SNNPR REGION : Who Does What Where (3W) (As of 01 March 2012)
    (as of 01 March 2012) SNNPR REGION : Who Does What Where (3W) Tigray Afar Amhara Sodo! ECS: a cç Benshangul Gumuz KebenaKokir Gedbano Dire Dawa Abeshege Addis Ababa Hareri Gambela Oromia Oromia Muhur Na Aklil Somali Cheha SNNPR Gurage Ezha Meskan Alicho Woriro Enemorina Eaner Gumer Selti Mareko Yem Geta Selti Legend Sayilem ! IRC: ç Endiguagn Dalocha Yem SP Wor!eda International Boundary Masha Gibe Misha Wilbareg Lanfero Regional Boundary Sheka Gesha (Deka) ECS: ah ç HadiyaAnalemmo ! Anderacha Getawa Gembora ! Sankura LVIA: a 4 l Zonal Boundary ! Limu Gambella Shash! ogo LVIA: a 4 l Plan Int.: : h Soro Woreda Boundary Gimbo Anigacha Alaba SP Woreda SC UK: h Bita (Big) ! Lake Dune Daniboy! a Alaba KT Plan Int.: h IMC: î h ç Yeki Chena Menjiwo Tembaro Keffa Kacha BiraKediada Gambela No Intervention/No Data Gena Bosa Misrak Badawacho Tocha Boloso Bom! be Other Region Sheka Tulo Wondo-Genet Semen Bench Boloso sore Awassa Zuria Mareka A! wasa Town Dawro Damot Gale Plan Int.: d Clusters/Sectors Ela (Konta) SP Woreda Kindo Koysha Diguna Fango ! Malga Gurafereda Debub BenchShay Bench Cheta Boricha Agriculture Decha Esira Damot Sore a Konta Loma Bosa Sodo ZuriaDamot Weydie Shebe DinoGorche Wolayita Dale : Disaster Management Menit Goldiye Kindo Dida Ofa Humbo Wonosho Arbe Gonna d Education ! Loka-Abaya ! Bursa Sidama ACF: aîlf Chuko 4 Environment Melekoza Kucha Boreda Bensa Menit Shasha ! Hulla Denibu Gofa Dara Bona Zu! ria ç Chire î Food Dila Zuria Bero BasketoGeze Gofa h Aroresa l Food Security Zala Mirab Abaya Wenago Basketo SP Woreda DaramaloDita
    [Show full text]
  • Value Chain Analysis of Beef Cattle Production in Wolaita Zone: the Case of Damot Gale District, Wolaita Sodo, Boditi and Areka Towns, Southern Ethiopia
    Reasearch Article Volume 7 Issue 1 - November 2017 Int J Environ Sci Nat Res DIO : 10.19080/IJESNR.2017.07.555704 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Zekarias Bassa Value Chain Analysis of Beef Cattle Production in Wolaita Zone: The Case of Damot Gale District, Wolaita Sodo, Boditi and Areka Towns, Southern Ethiopia Zekarias Bassa*, Alemayehu Bashe and Tesfaye Alemu Zekarias Bassa*, Alemayehu Bashe and Tesfaye Alemu Areka Agricultural Research center, Ethiopia, Africa Submission: October 30, 2017; Published: November 30, 2017 *Corresponding author: Zekarias Bassa, Areka Agricultural Research Center, Africa, Tel: ; Fax: 251465520502; Email: Abstract Beef cattle production and value addition practices are known as major income earning activities and economic stay of the farmers, brokers, is not comparable to the economic value the sector own. This study, therefore, was initiated to identify value chain actors and their function in the chain,traders, investigate hotels and factors restaurants affecting and value also provideadded in huge beef financial production support and economic town for administrativerole beef value inchain Wolaita for districts. area, yet Both attention primary given and to secondarythe sector data were used for this study. Primary data were collected from 102 sampled farmers, 21 hotels and restaurants, 3 town administrative (Wolaiyta Sodo, Areka, Boditi) and 15 experts from different strata. Before the household survey, key informant interview and focus group discussions were conducted using 20 small scale farmers, 5 hotels and restaurants, 1 town administrative and 1 expert. Keywords: Beef Cattle; Value Chain; Value Added; Income; Market; Institution Introduction administrative as revenue source that calculated to be more than Descriptive Statistics and Econometric data analysis one million Ethiopian Birr in Areka annually.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Regional Assessment of Self Supply Potential in SNNPR, Ethiopia
    Research-inspired Policy and Practice Learning in Ethiopia and the Nile Region Towards a regional assessment of self supply potential in SNNPR, Ethiopia David M J Macdonald British Geological Survey September 2012 Research-inspired Policy and Practice Learning in Ethiopia and the Nile Region (RiPPLE) Research-inspired Policy and Practice Learning in Ethiopia and the Nile Region (RiPPLE) is now a thriving independent Ethiopian NGO, with a reputation for high quality independent research, capacity building and knowledge management. RiPPLE started life as a 5-year Research Programme Consortium funded by UKaid from the Department for International Development aiming to advance evidence-based learning on water supply and sanitation (WSS). The RiPPLE Consortium was previously led by the Overseas Development Institute (ODI), working with the College of Development Studies at Addis Ababa University; the Ethiopian Catholic Church Social and Development Coordination Office of Harar (ECC-SDCOH), International Water & Sanitation Centre (IRC) and WaterAid-Ethiopia. RiPPLE Working Papers contain research questions, methods, analysis and discussion of research results (from case studies or desk research). They are intended to stimulate debate on policy implications of research findings as well as feed into Long-term Action Research. RiPPLE Office, Kirkos Sub-City, Kebele 08/09, House no 560, PO Box 5842, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Acknowledgements I thank those members of staff of the Ripple offices in Ethiopia who have helped with this study, in particular Desta Dimtse. I am grateful to Lorraine Coulter of The Food Economy Group for supplying livelihoods survey data. Thank you also, for their advice, to John Butterworth of IRC, Eyasu Mamo of the Ethiopian Bureau of Water Resources, Lemessa Mekonta and Sally Sutton and to colleagues in the British Geological Survey, Andrew McKenzie and Alan MacDonald.
    [Show full text]
  • Potassium (K)-To-Magnesium (Mg) Ratio, Its Spatial Variability And
    Laekemariam et al. Agric & Food Secur (2018) 7:13 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-018-0165-5 Agriculture & Food Security RESEARCH Open Access Potassium (K)‑to‑magnesium (Mg) ratio, its spatial variability and implications to potential Mg‑induced K defciency in Nitisols of Southern Ethiopia Fanuel Laekemariam1*, Kibebew Kibret2 and Hailu Shiferaw3 Abstract Background: Potassium (K) availability depends on exchangeable K and relative amounts of other cations. Yet, the latter has mostly been overlooked. Thus, this study was conducted to evaluate availability and spatial distribution of soil K in Nitisols of Wolaita area, southern Ethiopia, with particular regard to emphasis on assessing the potential for magnesium (Mg)-induced K defciency. About 789 soil samples were investigated and mapped using ordinary kriging method. Results: The result showed that 14.8% of the samples were K-defcient based on exchangeable K rating, whereas the K defciency due to antagonistic efects of Mg was 54%. The spatial analysis also revealed that 68% of the study area (i.e., 57, 120 ha) has shown Mg-induced K defciency. The fnding is against the long belief that soils of the study area and the country contain sufcient quantity of K. Conclusion: The fndings of this study imply the need for inclusive approach while assessing the K status of soils and also call for greater attention toward K fertilizer intervention that was not in place in the study area. Nonetheless, further study including fertilizer application rates is suggested. Keywords: Antagonism efect, Ethiopia, Geostatistics, Mapping Introduction Fertilizer-related interventions in Ethiopia were based Potassium ­(K+) is an essential plant nutrient next to on national soil survey that was conducted by FAO nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P).
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Fertility Management Practices for Faba Bean
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 2 March 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202103.0076.v1 1 Soil Fertility Management Practices For Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) Production in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia Bekalu Abebe1*, Nigussie Dechassa2, Tamado Tana3, Fanuel Laekemariam1 and Yibekal Alemayehu2 1. Department of Plant Science, Wolaita Sodo University, P.O. Box 138, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia 2. Department of Plant Sciences, Haramaya University, P.O. Box 138, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia 3. Department of Crop Production, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Eswatini, P.O. Luyengo, Eswatini. *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract: Understanding the soil fertility management practices is indispensable to improve faba bean productivity. However, little effort has been made to assess the soil fertility management practices of faba bean producing farmers of Wolaita Zone, southern Ethiopia. The study was conducted in Damot Gale and Sodo Zuria districts in Wolaita Zone to assess farmers’ soil fertility management practices for faba bean production, in 2019 on 310 framers. Faba bean productivity in the studied districts is majorly constrained by the scarcity of arable land, poor soil fertility, and soil acidity. These cumulative effects have caused negative consequences on soil fertility and faba bean productivity. In most soil fertility, management practices in faba bean farm did not significantly vary among the studied districts. The soil management practices by farmers were inadequate to improve the soil fertility and to enhance faba bean productivity. Consequently, the average grain productions of both fertilized and unfertilized faba bean farm were far less than the national average. Therefore, intensive soil fertility management interventions such as faba bean residue management, crop rotation, application of sufficient and balanced fertilizers, adequate lime application, screening acidity tolerant varieties are required to improve faba bean productivity.
    [Show full text]
  • World Vision Ethiopia the Sodo Community Managed Reforestation (Forest Regeneration) Project
    Assessed by: Validation Assessment Report for: World Vision Ethiopia The Sodo Community Managed Reforestation (Forest Regeneration) Project in Wolayita Zone, Sodo Zuria and Damot Gale 65 Millet St. Suite 201 Richmond, VT 05477 USA Woredas Tel: 802-434-5491 Fax: 802-434-3116 Southern Highlands of Ethiopia www.rainforest-alliance.org Report Finalized: August 1, 2013 Audit Dates: 21-25 November 2011 Lead Auditor: Mateo Cariño Fraisse Audit Team Assefa Tigneh, Thales West Member(s): Audit Standard: CCBA Second Edition (2008) Validation Code(s): RA- VAL-CCB-016827 Carbon Forestry Project Audit Project Managed by: 7.416670, 38.269170 Africa Regional Office Latitude/Longitude: Contact person: Mateo Cariño Fraisse Project Proponent Dean Thomson Email: [email protected] Contact: Project Proponent 1 Vision Drive, East Burwood, 3151 Vistoria, Australia Address: 1 G-38 2Aug12 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Objective ............................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Scope and Criteria ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Project Description ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]