DOCSLIB.ORG

APPENDIX F1 Historical Resources Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APPENDIX F1 Historical Resources Technical Report APPENDIX F1 Historical Resources Technical Report Historical Resources Technical Report for the North City Project San Diego County, California City Project No. 386038 PTS #499621 Prepared for: City of San Diego Public Utilities Department 9192 Topaz Way San Diego, California 92123 Contact: Keli Balo Prepared by: Kara R. Dotter, MSHP; Samantha Murray, MA, RPA; and Matthew DeCarlo, BA 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 SEPTEMBER 2017 Type of Study: Historical Resources Inventory USGS Quadrangles: Del Mar, El Cajon, La Jolla, La Mesa, Poway, and San Vicente Reservoir, CA Area: Approximately 52 miles Key Words: Historical Resources Inventory, City of San Diego Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Historical Resources Technical Report for the North City Project, San Diego County, California TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................... V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................VII 1 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1 1.1 Regulatory Framework ........................................................................................... 2 1.1.1 Federal......................................................................................................... 2 1.1.2 State........................................................................................................... 34 1.1.3 Local ......................................................................................................... 35 1.2 Report Organization .............................................................................................. 37 1.3 Project Area .......................................................................................................... 38 1.4 Project Personnel .................................................................................................. 38 2 PROJECT SETTING ......................................................................................................39 2.1 Physical Project Setting ........................................................................................ 39 2.2 Project Area and Vicinity...................................................................................... 39 2.3 Historical Overview .............................................................................................. 40 2.3.1 Spanish Period (1769–1821) ..................................................................... 41 2.3.2 Mexican Period (1821–1846) ................................................................... 42 2.3.3 American Period (1846–Present) .............................................................. 42 2.3.4 Development of San Diego County’s Source Water System .................... 44 3 METHODS AND RESULTS ..........................................................................................53 3.1 Archival Research ................................................................................................. 53 3.2 Field Survey .......................................................................................................... 53 3.2.1 North City Project Components ................................................................ 54 3.2.2 Miramar Reservoir Alternative ................................................................. 56 3.2.3 San Vicente Reservoir Alternative............................................................ 57 3.3 Description of Surveyed Resources ...................................................................... 58 3.3.1 877 Sherman Street ................................................................................... 58 3.3.2 Tecolote Creek Concrete Channel ............................................................ 65 3.3.3 Scripps Meanley Stables and House Complex (HRB 450) ...................... 67 3.3.4 5111 Private Road, in the 13500 Block of Moreno Avenue ..................... 76 i September 2017 Historical Resources Technical Report for the North City Project, San Diego County, California TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Section Page No. 4 SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATION ..................................................................................81 4.1 Tecolote Creek Concrete Channel ........................................................................ 81 4.1.1 NRHP/CRHR Evaluation.......................................................................... 81 4.1.2 Integrity ..................................................................................................... 82 4.1.3 Evaluation Conclusion .............................................................................. 82 4.2 5111 Private Road, in the 13500 Block of Moreno Avenue ................................. 82 4.2.1 NRHP/CRHR Evaluation.......................................................................... 82 4.2.2 Integrity ..................................................................................................... 83 4.2.3 Evaluation Conclusion .............................................................................. 84 5 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................85 5.1 Impacts Discussion ............................................................................................... 85 5.1.1 National Historic Preservation Act ........................................................... 85 5.1.2 California Environmental Quality Act ...................................................... 86 5.2 Recommended Mitigation ..................................................................................... 88 6 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................91 APPENDIX A DPR Forms for Tecolote Creek Concrete Channel and 5111 Private Road in the 13500 Block of Moreno Avenue AND Existing DPR and Nomination Forms for 877 Sherman Street and the Scripps Meanley Ranch and House Complex ii September 2017 Historical Resources Technical Report for the North City Project, San Diego County, California TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Page No. FIGURES 1 Regional Map .......................................................................................................................3 2A Vicinity Map ........................................................................................................................5 2B Vicinity Map ........................................................................................................................7 2C Vicinity Map ........................................................................................................................9 2D Vicinity Map ......................................................................................................................11 2E Vicinity Map ......................................................................................................................13 2F Vicinity Map ......................................................................................................................15 2G Vicinity Map ......................................................................................................................17 2H Vicinity Map ......................................................................................................................19 2I Vicinity Map ......................................................................................................................21 2J Vicinity Map ......................................................................................................................23 2K Vicinity Map ......................................................................................................................25 2L Vicinity Map ......................................................................................................................27 3 Miramar Reservoir Alternative ..........................................................................................29 4 San Vicente Reservoir Alternative.....................................................................................31 5 Public entrance to the Humane Society, main elevation; view south from Sherman Street (Photo credit: Dudek). ..............................................................................59 6 Main elevation east of public entrance; view looking southeast from Sherman Street (Photo credit: Dudek). .............................................................................................60 7 View of the main and east elevations; looking southwest from the intersection of Custer Street with Sherman Street (Photo credit: Dudek). ............................................61 8 View of part of the east elevation; looking southwest from Custer Street (Photo credit: Dudek). ........................................................................................................62 9 Western portion of southwest elevation; view looking northeast (Photo credit: Dudek). ........................................................................................................63 10 Eastern portion of southwest elevation; view looking east (Photo credit: Dudek). ........................................................................................................64 11 View of the Tecolote Creek concrete channel, looking
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Committee San Diego County Water Authority Board Meeting
    S San Diego County Water Authority Board Meeting Documents February 26, 2015 Committee Administrative and Finance Engineering and Operations Imported Water Legislation, Conservation and Outreach Water Planning Formal Board Frank Gehrke, chief of snow surveys at the California Department of Water Resources, measures snow depth in the Sierra Nevada on January 29, 2015. Photo © California Department of Water Resources. Page 1 of 258 NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ AND STANDING COMMITTEES’ REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 26, 2015 BOARD ROOM WATER AUTHORITY HEADQUARTERS BUILDING 4677 OVERLAND AVENUE, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 1. UNIFIED AGENDA: This unified agenda provides a brief description of each item to be considered by the Board and its Administrative and Finance, Engineering and Operations, Imported Water, Legislation, Conservation and Outreach, and Water Planning Committees. For convenience, the agenda for each of the Committees and for the formal Board meeting are stated separately; however, all agendas shall be considered as a single agenda and any item listed on the agenda of any Committee may be acted upon by the Board. All items on the agenda of any Committee, including information items, may be deliberated and become subject to action by the Board. 2. DOCUMENTS: Staff reports and any other public information provided to the Board or Committee before the meeting relating to items on the agenda are available for public review at the San Diego County Water Authority 4677 Overland Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 during normal business hours. Additional documents may be distributed at the meeting. Copies of individual items, including the background information, are available through the Clerk of the Board at (858) 522-6614.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Supply Assessment and Verification Report
    Water Supply Assessment and Verification Report Newland Sierra Specific Plan December 2015 (Revised - July 2016) Prepared for Vallecitos Water District This page is intentionally left blank. Water Supply Assessment and Verification Report Newland Sierra Specific Plan Contents 1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Findings ............................................................................................................................................... 3 3 Project Description .............................................................................................................................. 5 4 Vallecitos Water District .................................................................................................................... 11 5 Historical and Projected Water Demands ......................................................................................... 13 5.1 Demand Management ............................................................................................................. 14 5.1.1 BMP Categories ......................................................................................................... 14 5.1.2 Senate Bill X 7-7 ......................................................................................................... 16 6 Existing and Projected Supplies .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Open Space and Agriculture (OS)
    Part Three: General Plan Elements – Open Space and Agriculture Open Space and Agriculture (OS) A. Introduction State law requires the Open Space Element to provide plans and measures for the preservation and conservation of open-space lands, which can include open space for the preservation of natural resources; the managed production Refer to the Safety Element of resources (including agricultural lands); outdoor for Open Space recreation (including areas of historic and cultural value, related to Public areas suited for park and recreation purposes, access to Health and Safety. beaches, rivers and streams, and areas which serve as links Refer to the between major recreation and open-space reservations); Safety and Land open space for public health and safety; open space in Use Element for a support of the mission of military installations, and open discussion of space for Native American historical, cultural, or sacred military sites1. installations. Approximately five percent of the planning area is dedicated to open space, parks, and agricultural uses. Only 2.3 percent of land within the planning area remains vacant. Parks – Open Due to the highly developed nature of the community, the space lands whose City faces significant challenges in the provision of primary purpose is recreation additional open space and recreational facilities. (Institute for Local Despite a lack of vacant land, opportunities exist within the Government) urban fabric of the community to provide new recreational and open space areas. Possible solutions include: rooftop gardens; closing or converting a limited number of redundant streets for the purpose of creating mini parks, community gardens, and plazas; incorporating trail systems into utility corridors; turning vacant parcels into parks or community gardens; and the enhancement of public street rights-of-way for use as open space.
    [Show full text]
  • Tijuana River Valley Existing Conditions Report
    Climate Understanding & Resilience in the River Valley Tijuana River Valley Existing Conditions Report Prepared by the Tijuana River National Estuarine Research Reserve for the CURRV project’s Stakeholder Working Group Updated April 14, 2014 This project is funded by a grant from the Coastal and Ocean Climate Applications Program of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Climate Program Office. Also, supported in part by a grant from the National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS) Science Collaborative. 1 Table of Contents Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Figures ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Resources and Geography ........................................................................................................................... 6 Climate ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Topography & Floodplain ....................................................................................................................... 6 Hydrology ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources Core Area
    Sweetwater Reservoir/ San Miguel Mountains/ Sweetwater River BRCA 94 Jamul Mountains BRCA eArea.mxd Mountains/Marron Valley BRCA Project Area Proposed Proctor Valley Road Alignment Otay Lakes/Otay Mesa/ Otay Ranch RMP Preserve, Conserved Open Space and Non-Impacted LDA Otay River Valley BRCA Cores Linkages 0 1,700 3,400 Feet SOURCE: USGS 7.5-minute Topographic Map; Hunsaker 2017; SANGIS 2016 FIGURE 3-3 Biological Resources Core Area Otay Ranch Village 14 and Planning Areas 16/19 - Preserve Status Report NOTE: See Figure 6-2 for Corridor and Habitat Linkages Post Exchange and Boundary Line Adjustment Date: 2/8/2018 - Last saved by: mmcginnis - Path: Z:\Projects\j820701\MAPDOC\DOCUMENT\BTR\PreserveAppendix\Figure3_3_BioCor - Path: mmcginnis by: saved Last - 2/8/2018 Date: Otay Ranch Village 14 and Planning Areas 16/19 Otay Ranch RMP Preserve Status Report INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 8207 122 February 2018 L4 R1 L4 R1 94 L3 L3 R1 L4 PRESUMPTIVE CORRIDOR Project Area R1 Proposed Proctor Valley Road Alignment Otay Ranch RMP Preserve, Conserved Open Space and Non-Impacted LDA Otay Ranch Village 13 L3 Public Lands CDFW Owned Land L3 K R E Wildlife Crossings Z U A R1 L E Upper R7 U R D C Proctor Valley Land Use Otay Project Applicant Otay Ranch Development Reservoir R7 Project Applicant Otay Ranch Preserve feCorridors.mxd Existing Wildlife Corridors Major Local Corridor for Focal Mammal and Bird Species Regional Corridor for Focal Mammal and Bird Species R2 R10 Public Lands R2 BLM R2 CDFW R10 DOD USFWS R11 R2 R8 0 1,700 3,400 Lower Otay Reservoir
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment B-4 San Diego RWQCB Basin Plan Beneficial Uses
    Attachment B-4 San Diego RWQCB Basin Plan Beneficial Uses Regulatory_Issues_Trends.doc CHAPTER 2 BENEFICIAL USES INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................1 BENEFICIAL USES ..........................................................................................................................1 BENEFICIAL USE DESIGNATION UNDER THE PORTER-COLOGNE WATER QUALITY CONTROL ACT ..1 BENEFICIAL USE DESIGNATION UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT .................................................2 BENEFICIAL USE DEFINITIONS.........................................................................................................3 EXISTING AND POTENTIAL BENEFICIAL USES ..................................................................................7 BENEFICIAL USES FOR SPECIFIC WATER BODIES ........................................................................8 DESIGNATION OF RARE BENEFICIAL USE ...................................................................................8 DESIGNATION OF COLD FRESHWATER HABITAT BENEFICIAL USE ...............................................9 DESIGNATION OF SPAWNING, REPRODUCTION, AND/ OR EARLY DEVELOPMENT (SPWN) BENEFICIAL USE ...................................................................................................11 SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER POLICY ..................................................................................11 EXCEPTIONS TO THE "SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER" POLICY................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Campo Wind Cultural Report
    APPENDIX I Cultural Resources Report CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY AND EVALUATION REPORT IN SUPPORT OF SECTION 106 OF THE NHPA for the CAMPO WIND PROJECT WITH BOULDER BRUSH FACILITIES Reviewing Agency: Bureau of Indian Affairs Pacific Region 2800 Cottage Way Sacramento, California 95825 Contact: Dan Hall Prepared by: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 Brad Comeau, MSc, RPA, Angela Pham, MA, RPA, Micah Hale, PhD, RPA and Rachel Hoerman, PhD, MAY 2019 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report for the Campo Wind Project with Boulder Brush Facilities NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATABASE (NADB) INFORMATION Authors: Brad Comeau, MSc, RPA; Angela Pham, MA, RPA; Micah J. Hale, PhD, RPA and Rachel Hoerman, PhD Firm: Dudek Project Proponent: Terra-Gen Development Company LLC 11512 El Camino Real, Suite 100 San Diego, California 92130 Report Date: April 2019 Report Title: Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report for the Campo Wind Project with Boulder Brush Facilities, San Diego County, California Type of Study: Phase I Archaeological Survey; Phase II Archaeological Evaluation New Sites: CWA-S-001, CWA-S-004, CWA-S-005, CWS-S-006, CWS-S-007, CWS-S- 008, CWS-S-009, CWS-S-010, CWS-S-011, CWS-S-012; ECWEP-I-015, ECWEP-SW-001, ECWEP-SW-003, ECWEP-SW-005, ECWEP-SW-006, ECWEP-SW-007, ECWEP-SW-009, ECWEP-SW-011, ECWEP-SW-017, TW-S-001, TW-S-002, TW-S-003, TW-S-007,TW-S-008, TW-S-009, TW-S- 010, TW-S-011, TW-S-012, TW-S-013, TW-S-014, TW-S-015, TW-S-016, TW-S-017, TW-S-030, TW-S-031,
    [Show full text]
  • Part XII Public Facility Element San Diego County General Plan
    Part XII Public Facility Element San Diego County General Plan Adopted March 13, 1991 Amended January 12, 2005 GPA 04-010 Amended October 15, 2008 GPA 08-007 Amended October 14, 2009 GPA 09-004 Section 1 - Introd uction ............................................ X 11-1-1 Section 2 - Coordination Among Facility Planning, Financing Programs and Land Use Planning ................................ XII-2-1 Section 3 - Parks and Recreation ............................ XII-3-1 Section 4 - Transportation ....................................... XII-4-1 Section 5 Flood Control ......................................... XII-5-1 Section 6 - Solid Waste ........................................... XII-6-1 Section 7 - Law Enforcement ................................... XII-7-1 Section 8 - Animal Control ....................................... XII-8-1 Section 9 - Libraries ................................................. XII-9-1 Section 10 - Schools .............................................. X11-10-1 Section 11 - Fire Protection and Emergency Services ......................... XII-11-1 Section 12 - Wastewater ........................................ XII-12-1 Section 13 - Water Provision Systems ................... XII-13-1 Section 14 Child Care .......................................... XII-14-1 Section 15 - Courts and Jails ................................. XII-15-1 Section 16 Social Services .................................. XII-16-1 Section 17 - Health ................................................ XII-17-1 Section 18 - Senior Services ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Description of Source Water System
    CHAPTER 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE SOURCE WATER SYSTEM 2.0 Description of the Source Water System During the last 100 years, the CSD’s water system has evolved into a very complex system. It is now estimated to serve a population of 1.4 million people spread out over 370 square miles (Table 2.1). The CSD treats imported raw water and local runoff water at three City WTPs which have a combined capacity of 378 MGD. The CSD treats water by conventional technologies using coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, filtration and disinfection. Recently, all CSD water treatment plants have been modified to provide for the addition of fluoride to the potable water supply. To ensure safe and palatable water quality, the CSD collects water samples at its reservoirs, WTPs, and throughout the treated water storage and distribution system. The CSD’s use of local and imported water to meet water demand is affected by availability, cost, and water resource management policies. Imported water availability decreases the need to carry over local water for dry years in City reservoirs. CSD policy is to use local water first to reduce imported water purchases; this policy runs the risk of increased dependence on imported water during local droughts. Table 2.1 - City of San Diego General Statistics Population (2010) 1,301,621 Population (Estimated 2014) 1,381,069 Population percent change 6.1 Land Area Square Miles 370 Population Density per Square Mile 3733 Water Distribution Area Square Miles 403 Number of Service Connections (2015) 279,102 2.1 Water Sources (Figure 2.1) Most of California's water development has been dictated by the multi-year wet/dry weather cycles.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitigated Negative Declaration
    Mitigated Negative Declaration PROJECT NAME: Otay River Restoration Project Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan PROJECT LOCATION: Otay River Valley ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO.: APNs: 644-090-04 (Mitigation Site) Portions of 647-130-00, 647-130-01, 647-130-02, 647-130- 07, 647-130-08, 647-130-10, 647-130-12, and 644-100-01-9 (Weed Treatment Activities to protect Restoration Site) PROJECT APPLICANT: HomeFed Otay Land II, LLC CASE NO.: IS-15-006 DATE OF DRAFT DOCUMENT: March 14, 2016 DATE OF FINAL DOCUMENT: TBD A. Project Setting The project site, the focus of which is a 100-acre restoration site, encompasses an approximately 300-acre parcel (mitigation site) located in and owned by the City of Chula Vista in southwestern San Diego County, California (see Attachment 1 for all figures; see Figures 1 and 2, Regional and Local Vicinity Maps). The project site also includes portions of seven additional parcels upstream owned by the County of San Diego, City of San Diego, and United States of America Public Domain, that would be treated for weeds to protect the restoration site (see Figure 3, Parcels Map). The site occurs within the upper portion of the Lower Otay River Watershed, approximately 1 mile downstream from Savage Dam. It is generally south and west of the Lower Otay Reservoir and surrounded by open space largely within the Multi-Species Conservation Program (MSCP) preserve system managed in partnership by the City of Chula Vista, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego. The project site is designated as Open Space Preserve by the City of Chula Vista and Open Space Conservation and Recreation by the County of San Diego.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of San Diego History Vol 53, 2007, Nos 1 & 2
    The Jour na l of San Diego History Publication of The Journal of San Diego History has been partially funded by generous grants from the Joseph W. Sefton Foundation; Quest for Truth Foundation of Seattle, Washington, established by the late James G. Scripps; and an anonymous friend and supporter of the Journal. Publication of this issue of The Journal of San Diego History has also been supported by a grant from “The Journal of San Diego History Fund” of the San Diego Foundation. The San Diego Historical Society is able to share the resources of four museums and its extensive collections with the community through the generous support of the following: City of San Diego Commission for Art and Culture; County of San Diego; foundation and government grants; individual and corporate memberships; corporate sponsorship and donation bequests; sales from museum stores and reproduction prints from the Booth Historical Photograph Archives; admissions; and proceeds from fund-raising events. Articles appearing in The Journal of San Diego History are abstracted and indexed in Historical Abstracts and America: History and Life. The paper in the publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Science-Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. Front Cover: Robinson-Rose House built in Old Town San Diego in 1874; presently the Old Town San Diego State Historic Park Visitors Center. Back Cover: Thomas Sefton with his collection of toy trains, September 4, 1958. ©SDHS UT #85:7793, Union-Tribune Collection. Cover Design: Allen Wynar The Journal of San Diego History Volume 53 Winter/Spring 2007 numbers 1 & 2 IRIS H.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Affected Environment 3.1
    CHAPTER 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 3.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes existing site characteristics and resources that may be affected by the Otay River Estuary Restoration Project (ORERP or proposed action). The approximately 165.3-acre project site is located within the South San Diego Bay Unit of the San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge (NWR). The project site encompasses two separate, non-contiguous areas: the Otay River Floodplain Site and the Pond 15 Site. The 33.51-acre Otay River Floodplain Site consists of undeveloped land held in trust for the people of California by the State Lands Commission and leased to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for management as a National Wildlife Refuge. The 90.90-acre Pond 15 Site is also leased to the Service from the State Lands Commission and is currently part of a component of the South Bay Salt Works, which operates on the San Diego Bay NWR under a Special Use Permit from the Service. This chapter analyzes project-specific environmental effects, and is intended to tier from the programmatic Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision for the San Diego Bay NWR Comprehensive Conservation Plan. The Environmental Impact Statement for the San Diego Bay NWR is incorporated by reference (USFWS 2006). 3.1.1 Regional and Historical Setting San Diego Bay and the San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge San Diego Bay is a natural embayment located entirely in San Diego County, California, that originated from the alluvial plains of the Otay, Sweetwater, and San Diego Rivers. The entrance to the nearly enclosed water body is located approximately 9 miles northwest of the project site.
    [Show full text]