XXXIII. a Sketch of the Geology of West Norfolk

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

XXXIII. a Sketch of the Geology of West Norfolk Philosophical Magazine Series 3 ISSN: 1941-5966 (Print) 1941-5974 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tphm14 XXXIII. A sketch of the geology of West Norfolk C.B. Rose To cite this article: C.B. Rose (1835) XXXIII. A sketch of the geology of West Norfolk , Philosophical Magazine Series 3, 7:40, 274-279, DOI: 10.1080/14786443508648715 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786443508648715 Published online: 01 Jun 2009. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 2 View related articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=3phm20 Download by: [University of Arizona] Date: 13 June 2016, At: 13:42 ~7# Mr., Rose's Sketch of the Geology of West NoTfolk. satisfactory. For the purpose, however, of dispelling any doubts of its accuracy which may exist in the minds of others, I undertook another series of test experiments~ to the descri p- tion of which I shall now proceed. [To be eontinued.] XXXllI. d Stretch of the Geology of West No~sfollc. Bff C. B. RosE, Fellow of the Rogal Medical and Chh'urgical Society of London. ['Continued from p. 18~.] The Challc Rangq. HE chalk hills of West Norfolk constitute a portion of T the .great range of that formation extending across En- gland in a south-westerly direction from Flamborough Head in Yorkshire to near Sidmouth in Devonshire. The greatest elevation they attain in this county is insignificant in com- parison with the hills at either extremity of the range: at Sedgeford, and between Heacham and Hunstanton, the face of the country possesses some boldness of feature, and again near Holt the hill and vale are strongly contrasted : with these exceptions, the course of the chalk outcrop through the county is marked by the gently undulating surface peculiar to such districts. • I have been favoured with a communication from Captain Robe, R.E., in reply to my inquiry respecting the height of the hills in this portion of the county. After stating that tile ~' triangulation of Norfolk was performed with instruments too small to be depended up6n for the vertical angle obser- vations," he continues, " I cannot now lay my hands on the sketch on which my judged altitudes were written ; but if I re- collect right, I considered the ground round Docking to be the highest, which was somewhere about 600 or 650 feet; Swaff- Downloaded by [University of Arizona] at 13:42 13 June 2016 ham is probably ~50 or 500, Gr~t'Massingham 600. But these are very rude guesses ; indeed without using accurate in- struments, it would be impossible to class the several ranges according to their relative altitudes, as they vary so very little from each other, and few of them exceeding 600 feet." The width of the rant~ taken at Swaffham is about seven miles; its course through the eotmty is nearly due north and south, and its esealgment is to the west, forming generally a somewhat abrupt declivity, bounded along the greater parl~ of its extent by a narrow valley occupied by the lowest strata of Chalk, and the gault. Tile strata dip to the south-east, pro- The Chalk Ra~e. 275 bably about five yards in the mile, and are covered by dilu- vium of varying thickness. The thickness of the chalk in this county has been but recently ascertained, as appears fi'om a communication to the Geological Society by John Taylor, Esq. It states that a well has been sunk at Diss by Mr. Thomas Lombe Taylor, and the following is the order and thickness of ttle beds pene- trated : 1. Clay ........................... 50 ft. 9. Sand ........................... 50 $. Chalk without flints, soft and of a marly nature 100 4. Chalk with flints in layers of single stones distant about a yard from each other ... ~ 330 5. Gray chalk, with an occasional layer of white ~. chalk, and fi'ee from flints . ........ J 60 6. Light bright blue chalk approaching to clay,q,. 20 with white chalk-stones ......... --- J 7. Sand ........................... 5 615" No. 6. must be gault ; and 7. the lower green-sand, Tile general surface of the chalk must have suffered prodi- gious abrasions from the violence of the elements, as evidenced by the immense quantity of gravel tbrmed and collected in various situations, as well as by the different altitudes at which the chalk is found: it appearing immediately beneath the ve- getable soil, even on the highest ground; and at a level not less than fifty feet lower, it may be found covered by more than 150 feet of sand and clay containing boulders. I shall describe the chalk strata under the natural divisions, Chalk without Flints' and ~ Chalk with Flints'. Chalk without Flints.-- Under this denomination I include allthe lower cretaceous beds. At Hunstanton Cliff, where they are exposed, reposing immediately upon the red chalk Downloaded by [University of Arizona] at 13:42 13 June 2016 (as it has hitherto been called), three natural divisions of them may be observed; the lowest is made up almost entirely of a ramose zoophite, which strongly characterizes it; the middle above has a gra.y colour and arenaeeous texture, abounds in organic remams ; the gray shale forcibly distin- guishes this; and the uppermost bed, usually denominated the lower chalk, which here forms the upper portion of the cliff, is readily distinguished by its pure whiteness. It has been attempted to separate and arrange these beds by theh" zoological characters; the zoophutic bed has been considered. * Proceedings of Geol. Society, vol. ii. p. 93. 2N2- ~76 Mr. Rose's Sketch of the Geology of West No~olk. the equivalent of the upper green-sand or d~restone ; and the ra3/bed that of the chalk-marl; but I find the characteristic ssils of the upper green-sand, and chalk-marl so intermingled in the gray bed, that it is impossible to draw a line of de- marcation between those two strata; and from this circum- stance we a're led to infer that at the epoch when the upper gree~t-sand and chalk-marl of Wiltshire and Devonshire were depositing, and the then existing marine Testace~e were en- tombed," similar ph~enomena were in progress in this portion of the great chalk basin ; but the material supplied being more cretaceous, the strata consequently exhibited a dissimilar mi- neralogicaleharacter. The lowest of these .beds. (No. 4, of the section of Flunstanton Cliff) reposes upon the thin seam of dark red argillaceous matter (described page l81), which separates it from the red limestone or gault equivalent. The texture of this bed varies, some portions of it being very loose, others exceedingly hard and compact; its substance is throughout intersected by a ramose zoophyte**, the original texture of which is so completely obliterated, that it appears impossible to determine precisely the nature of what it is the relic: the formation of the stratum is best explained by sup- posing it originally a coral reef, and its interstices filled with cretaceous mud ; it is about eighteen inches in thickness, and contains very few organic remains. Chalk resembling it in hartlness and fracture oeeurs at. Heytesburyin Wiltshire. • The next bed in the ascending series to be described~ is No. $ of the same section. Its colour is gray, and its texture less compact than the harder parts of the last-mentioned ; on being fractured it exhibits an arenaeeous surface, from its having a larger proportion of silex incorporated than the white chalk above. It is probable that thisstratum at the cliff receives its hardness fi'0m the action of sea-water upon it; for the chalk of the same bed met with inland can be cut with a common knife, being much softer. This bed abounds Downloaded by [University of Arizona] at 13:42 13 June 2016 with organic remains, and contains the characteristic Testaeea of the Upper green-sand, and also of the chalk-marl, viz. Ostrea carinata and Turrilites tuberculatus. In this bed at Hunstanton are found the Saurian remains ; and I believe their charnel-house is at present confined to one block. The thickness of this bed varies from two feet and a half to three feet. Large flattened Ammonites occur in it, also a Nautilus; and innumerable fragments oflnoceramus Criflsii are scattered through it. A stratum containing similar fossil remains is seen at Sand- * A nearly corresponding bed, composed of ramose zoophytes,occurs in Sussex : vide Geology of S.-E. of England, p. 384 note d. The Chalk Range. 27T Marham, Shouldham, West Doreham Orange, toKe ~erry, and Hoekwold-eum-Wilton. The gray chalk- marl at Sandringham is of nearly as dark a shade as that of Hunstanton; and in it are found the same Ammonites, and Peeten Beave~'i and orbicularis. The same bed at Shouldham has a lighter shade, and has many ochraeeous stains : at this locality blocks of an exceed- ingly hard nature are irregularly distributed through the softer marl; their solidity defies the blows of the quarrymen, and they are not convertible into lime by the heat of the kiln. Here I found.4mmonites Mantelli, Plicatula iz~ata, and other shells common to the lowest beds of chalk. At rff'est Dereham Grange, the Inoeeramus Cripsil (?) in fi'agments is very abundant, in a matrix of the same character as at the last-mentioned locality. In the lower beds of chalk at Marham have been found two claws of Astacus Sussexiensis, and part of a striated tooth with fragments of bone of some Saurian animal, all of which I possess.
Recommended publications
  • Ashwood Manor:Layout 1 29/4/10 16:04 Page 1
    A10643 Ashwood Manor:Layout 1 29/4/10 16:04 Page 1 Ashwood Manor Pentney | Norfolk A10643 Ashwood Manor:Layout 1 29/4/10 16:04 Page 2 A10643 Ashwood Manor:Layout 1 29/4/10 16:04 Page 3 Ashwood Manor Pentney | Norfolk | PE32 1JD Swaffham 6 miles, King’s Lynn 8 miles, Watlington Station (Service to Kings Cross) 6 miles, Coast 16 miles, Cambridge 40 miles, Norwich 40 miles A superbly presented country house with two luxury holiday cottages in delightful rural setting Entrance hall | Reception hall | Drawing room | Dining room | Study | Conservatory | Kitchen/breakfast room Laundry room | Utility | Cloakroom First floor: Master bedroom with dressing room and en suite bathroom | Bedroom 2 (en suite) | Bedrooms 3 and 4 with ‘Jack & Jill’ bathroom | Bedroom 5 Ashwood Manor Cottage: Entrance hall | Sitting room Dining room | Garden room | Kitchen | Bedroom 5 Shower room First floor: 4 bedrooms (2 en suite) | Bathroom The Wing: Entrance hall | Sitting room | Kitchen | Shower room | 2 bedrooms (1 en suite) Heated indoor swimming pool | 2 changing rooms with showers | Fitness room | Sauna room | Boiler room Paddocks | Stables with tack room | Manege area | Field shelter Formal and informal gardens | Well-stocked pond with carp About 9.4 acres A10643 Ashwood Manor:Layout 1 29/4/10 16:04 Page 4 A10643 Ashwood Manor:Layout 1 29/4/10 16:04 Page 5 Ashwood Manor Ashwood Manor is believed to have been built around 1840 and has subsequently been altered and extended and was named “The Villa” in 1898. The property has been extensively renovated, refurbished and improved by the current vendors having formerly been used for a variety of uses including residential, hotel and hostel.
    [Show full text]
  • CULLINGTON CUP 2018 2Nd Round Results & 3Rd Round Draw
    CULLINGTON CUP 2018 2nd round results & 3rd round draw Club Venue Result Costessey Park Home Costessey Park - 12 holes Middleton Hall Away Gt Yar & Caister Home Royal Cromer – 12 holes Royal Comer Away King’s Lynn Home Kings Lynn – 27 holes Royal Norwich Away Barnham Broom Home Barnham Broom – 24 holes Richmond Park Away Thetford Home Dunston Hall – 4 holes Dunston Hall Away Ryston Park Home Ryston Park – 1 hole RAF Marham Away Sprowston Manor Home Sprowston Manor – 18 holes Feltwell Away Wensum Valley Home Wensum Valley – 6 holes Bawburgh Away M. 1st Round M. 2nd Round M. 3rd Round M. Semi-Finals Final No 22nd April No 17th June No 22nd July No 19th August 16th September H Sheringham 1 H Winner Match 5 A Costessey Park 12 Thetford H Gt Yar & Caister H Winner Match 12 2 A Winner Match 8 Dunston Hall A Fakenham Dunston Hall H Hunstanton 20 3 H Winner Match 7 H Winner Match 22 A King’s Lynn Ryston Park H Richmond Park 13 4 A Winner Match 11 A Winner Match 18 A Heacham Manor RAF Marham Kings Lynn H Eaton 24 5 H Winner Match 10 A Thetford 14 Wensum Valley H Bawburgh H Winner Match 17 6 A Winner Match 6 Royal Cromer A Mundesley Bawburgh H Ryston Park 21 7 H Winner Match 9 A Winner Match 21 A Swaffham 15 Sprowston Manor H Dunston Hall A Winner Match 13 8 A Feltwell Ryston Park Winner Match 24 A Mattishall H Sprowston Manor 9 H Winner Match 1 Winner Match 25 A The Links 16 Costessey Park H Winner Match 19 Barnham Broom H Dereham 22 H Winner Match 20 10 A Middleton Hall A Wensum Valley H RAF Marham 11 H Winner Match 2 A Winner Match 16 A Caldecott Hall Gt Yar & Caister Costessey Park 17 B1 Feltwell A Royal Cromer 25 B2 Barnham Broom H Winner Match 3 H Winner Match 14 King's Lynn Wensum Valley 18 B3 Middleton Hall A Royal Norwich 23 A Winner Match 23 B4 Royal Norwich H Barnham Broom A Winner Match 15 19 Sprowston Manor B5 Royal Cromer A Winner Match 4 Richmond Park .
    [Show full text]
  • NORFOLK. SMI 793 Dyball Alfred, West Raynham, Faken- Hales William Geo
    TRADES DIRECTORY. J NORFOLK. SMI 793 Dyball Alfred, West Raynham, Faken- Hales William Geo. Ingham, Norwich Kitteringham John, Tilney St. Law- ham Hall P. Itteringham, Aylsham R.S.O rence, Lynn Dyball E. T. 24 Fuller's hill, Yarmouth Hammond F. Barroway Drove, Downhm Knights Edwd. H. London rd. Harleston Dye Henry Samuel, 39 Audley street & Hammond Richard, West Bilney, Lynn Knott Charles, Ten Mile Bank, Downhm North Market road, Yarmouth & at Pentney, Swaffham Kybird J ames, Croxton, Thetford Earl Uriah, Coltishall, Norwich Hammond Robert Edward Hazel, Lade Frederick Wacton, Long Stratton Easter Frederick, Mileham, Swaffham Gayton, Lynn Lake Thomas, Binham, Wighton R.S.O Easter George, Blofield, Norwich Hammond William, Stow Bridge, Stow Lambert William Claydon, Wiggenhall Ebbs William, Alburgh, Harleston Bardolph, Downham St. Mary Magdalen, Lynn Edward Alfred, Griston, Thetford Hanton J ames, W estEnd street, Norwich Langham Alfred, Martham, Yarmouth Edwards Edward, Wretham, Great Harbord P. Burgh St. Margaret, Yarmth Lansdell Brothers, Hempnall, Norwich Hockham, Thetford Hardy Harry, Lake's end, Wisbech Lansdell Albert, Stratton St. Mary, Eggleton W. Great Ryburgh, Fakenham Harper Robt. Alfd. Halvergate, Nrwch Long Stratton R.S.O Eglington & Gooch, Hackford, Norwich Harrold Samuel, Church end, West Larner Henry, Stoke Ferry ~.0 Eke Everett, Mulbarton, Norwich Walton, Wisbech Last F. B. 93 Sth. Market rd. Yarmouth Eke Everet, Bracon Ash, Norwich Harrowven Henry, Catton, Norwich Lawes Harry Wm. Cawshm, Norwich Eke James, Saham Ton.ey, Thetford Hawes A. Terrington St. John, Wisbech Laws .Jo~eph, Spixworth, Norwich Eke R. Drayton, Norwich Hawes Robert Hilton, Terrington St. Leader James, Po!'ltwick, Norwich Ellis Charles, Palling, Norwich Clement, Lynn Leak T.
    [Show full text]
  • Areas Designated As 'Rural' for Right to Buy Purposes
    Areas designated as 'Rural' for right to buy purposes Region District Designated areas Date designated East Rutland the parishes of Ashwell, Ayston, Barleythorpe, Barrow, 17 March Midlands Barrowden, Beaumont Chase, Belton, Bisbrooke, Braunston, 2004 Brooke, Burley, Caldecott, Clipsham, Cottesmore, Edith SI 2004/418 Weston, Egleton, Empingham, Essendine, Exton, Glaston, Great Casterton, Greetham, Gunthorpe, Hambelton, Horn, Ketton, Langham, Leighfield, Little Casterton, Lyddington, Lyndon, Manton, Market Overton, Martinsthorpe, Morcott, Normanton, North Luffenham, Pickworth, Pilton, Preston, Ridlington, Ryhall, Seaton, South Luffenham, Stoke Dry, Stretton, Teigh, Thistleton, Thorpe by Water, Tickencote, Tinwell, Tixover, Wardley, Whissendine, Whitwell, Wing. East of North Norfolk the whole district, with the exception of the parishes of 15 February England Cromer, Fakenham, Holt, North Walsham and Sheringham 1982 SI 1982/21 East of Kings Lynn and the parishes of Anmer, Bagthorpe with Barmer, Barton 17 March England West Norfolk Bendish, Barwick, Bawsey, Bircham, Boughton, Brancaster, 2004 Burnham Market, Burnham Norton, Burnham Overy, SI 2004/418 Burnham Thorpe, Castle Acre, Castle Rising, Choseley, Clenchwarton, Congham, Crimplesham, Denver, Docking, Downham West, East Rudham, East Walton, East Winch, Emneth, Feltwell, Fincham, Flitcham cum Appleton, Fordham, Fring, Gayton, Great Massingham, Grimston, Harpley, Hilgay, Hillington, Hockwold-Cum-Wilton, Holme- Next-The-Sea, Houghton, Ingoldisthorpe, Leziate, Little Massingham, Marham, Marshland
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Minerals and Waste Local Plan Pre-Submission
    Norfolk Minerals and Waste Local Plan Minerals Site Specific Allocations Plan – Single Issue Silica Sand Review Pre-submission March 2016 www.norfolk.gov.uk Norfolk Minerals and Waste Local Plan Minerals Site Specific Allocations Plan – Single Issue Silica Sand Review Pre-submission March 2016 T. McCabe – Executive Director Community and Environmental Services Norfolk County Council Martineau Lane Norwich NR1 2SG www.norfolk.gov.uk If you would need this document in large print, audio, braille, an alternative format or a different language please contact Norfolk County Council on 0344 800 8020 or 0344 8008011 (textphone) and we will do our best to help. 1 Contents Page 1. Introduction 4 2. The process so far 7 3. Representation Procedure 11 4. What Happens Next 12 5. Amendments to the adopted Minerals Site Specific Allocations Plan 13 6. Allocated specific site and areas of search 19 Specific Site – SIL01 (Mintlyn South) 20 AOS A – land west of Snettisham, Ingoldisthorpe and Dersingham 24 AOS D – land in the vicinity of West Bilney Wood 27 AOS E – land to the north of Shouldham 30 AOS F – land to the north of Stow Bardolph 34 AOS I – land to the east of South Runcton 36 AOS J – land to the east of Tottenhill 38 7. Area of Search Policy 40 8. Glossary 42 2 Abbreviations AONB Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty AoS Area of Search CWS County Wildlife Site NPPF National Planning Policy Framework NPPG National Planning Practice Guidance SAC Special Area of Conservation SPA Special Protection Area SSA Site Specific Allocations SSSI Site of Special Scientific Interest PRoW Public Right of Way 3 1.
    [Show full text]
  • ID Codes for GP Practice Records on the 111 Dos
    ID codes for GP practice Records on the 111 DoS If you have any queries regarding this information, please contact [email protected] ODS Code Service ID Service Name D82104 138889 GP - Acle Medical Partnership - Acle, Norfolk D82104 138889 GP - Acle Medical Partnership - Acle, Norfolk D82040b 138846 GP - Adelaide Street Health Centre (branch of Wensum Valley) - Norwich D82628 138896 GP - Aldborough Surgery - Aldborough, Norfolk D83002 158483 GP - Alexandra Road Surgery - Lowestoft D83608 158484 GP - Andaman Surgery - Long Road, Lowestoft D82034a 138839 GP - Attleborough Surgeries - Queens Square, Attleborough, Norfolk D82034 138838 GP - Attleborough Surgeries - Station Road, Attleborough D82060 138864 GP - Bacon Road Medical Practice - Bacon Road, Norwich D82040a 138847 GP - Bates Green Health Centre (Wensum Valley MP) - Bates Green, Norfolk D82070a 1320138089 GP - Bayfield Surgery (branch Great Massingham MP) - Docking, Norfolk D83009 158485 GP - Beccles Health Centre - St. Marys Road, Beccles, Suffolk Y03595 138825 GP - Beechcroft Surgery (Taverham Partnership) New Costessey, Norwich D82059 138863 GP - Birchwood Surgery - North Walsham, Norfolk D82001001 138806 GP - Blakeney Surgery (branch Holt MP) - Blakeney, Norfolk D82080 138879 GP - Blofield Surgery - Blofield, Norfolk D82604 123114 GP - Boughton Surgery - Boughton, Kings Lynn Y05472 1461150320 GP - Bowthorpe Care Village (Branch of Norwich Practices Ltd) - Norwich, Norfolk D82017001 1340624567 GP - Bowthorpe Health Centre (branch Trinity & Bowthorpe) - Bowthorpe, Norwich D83011
    [Show full text]
  • SITE ALLOCATIONS and DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT POLICIES PLAN Adopted September 2016 SADMP
    SITE ALLOCATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT POLICIES PLAN Adopted September 2016 SADMP Contents Contents A Introduction 2 B Minor Amendments to Core Strategy 10 C Development Management Policies 16 C.1 DM1 - Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development 16 C.2 DM2 - Development Boundaries 17 C.3 DM2A - Early Review of Local Plan 20 C.4 DM3 - Development in the Smaller Villages and Hamlets 21 C.5 DM4 - Houses in Multiple Occupation 24 C.6 DM5 - Enlargement or Replacement of Dwellings in the Countryside 26 C.7 DM6 - Housing Needs of Rural Workers 27 C.8 DM7 - Residential Annexes 30 C.9 DM8 - Delivering Affordable Housing on Phased Development 32 C.10 DM9 - Community Facilities 34 C.11 DM10 - Retail Development 36 C.12 DM11 - Touring and Permanent Holiday Sites 38 C.13 DM12 - Strategic Road Network 41 C.14 DM13 - Railway Trackways 44 C.15 DM14 - Development associated with the National Construction College, Bircham Newton and RAF Marham 50 C.16 DM15 - Environment, Design and Amenity 52 C.17 DM16 - Provision of Recreational Open Space for Residential Developments 54 C.18 DM17 - Parking Provision in New Development 57 C.19 DM18 - Coastal Flood Risk Hazard Zone (Hunstanton to Dersingham) 59 C.20 DM19 Green Infrastructure/Habitats Monitoring and Mitigation 64 C.21 DM20 - Renewable Energy 68 C.22 DM21 - Sites in Areas of Flood Risk 70 C.23 DM22 - Protection of Local Open Space 72 D Settlements & Sites - Allocations and Policies 75 SADMP Contents E King's Lynn & Surrounding Area 83 E.1 King's Lynn & West Lynn 83 E.2 West Winch 115 E.3 South
    [Show full text]
  • King's Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council (Anmer
    THE SANDRINGHAM ROYAL ESTATE It will be noticed that no public rights of way have been claimed across land comprising the Sandringham Royal Estate. As this is a private estate of Her Majesty the Queen it was mistakenly omitted from inclusion in the original survey of the definitive map and statement due to the belief that the estate was exempt from the provisions of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949 as Crown Land. The Sandringham Royal Estate does not in fact qualify as Crown Land as a private estate of Her Majesty the Queen. All public rights of way within the Estate have, therefore, been mistakenly excluded from this survey. DEFINITIVE STATEMENT OF PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY KING'S LYNN AND WEST NORFOLK DISTRICT PARISH OF ANMER This parish lies wholly within the Sandringham Royal Estate which is exempt from the provisions of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act, 1949. PARISH OF BAGTHORPE-WITH-BARMER Restricted Byway No. 1 (Barmer-South Creake Road to Parish Boundary). Starts from the Barmer to South Creake Road, opposite Restricted Byway No. 2, and runs north north-westwards to the parish boundary. Restricted Byway No. 2 (Barmer-South Creake Road to Parish Boundary). Starts from the Barmer-South Creake Road and runs south eastwards for approximately 330 yards, then bears more easterly running through Manor Ling Wood to the parish boundary where it joins Syderstone Restricted Byway No. 4. Restricted Byway No. 3 (Barmer-South Creake Road to Parish Boundary). Starts from the Barmer-South Creake Road at Barmer Farm and runs in a south easterly direction to the parish boundary at the north east corner of Twenty Acre Plantation where it joins Syderstone Restricted Byway No.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Map Books
    Dersingham North Wootton Congham Castle Rising Division Freebridge Lynn Arrangements for Clenchwarton & King's Lynn South South Wootton Roydon County District Terrington St. Clement Final Recommendations King's Lynn North & Central Gaywood North & Central Parish Clenchwarton Grimston Marshland North Clenchwarton & King's Lynn South Gaywood South Bawsey Walpole Cross Keys Leziate Tilney All Saints North Runcton Walpole Middleton East Winch Nar & Wissey Valleys Terrington St. John Watlington & The Fens West Winch Wiggenhall St. Germans Tilney St. Lawrence Walpole Highway Pentney Wormegay 00.5 1 2 Watlington Tottenhill Kilometers Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2016 © Crown copyright and database rights 2016 OSGD Wiggenhall St. Mary Magdalen 100049926 2016 Marshland St. James Wiggenhall St. Mary Magdalen Shouldham North Creake Heacham Stanhoe Sedgeford Docking South Creake Barwick North Coast Division Arrangements for Snettisham Fring Dersingham Syderstone Bagthorpe with Barmer Docking County Ingoldisthorpe Shernborne Bircham District Dunton Final Dersingham Recommendations Tattersett East Rudham Parish Anmer Houghton Sandringham Dersingham Fakenham & The Raynhams North Wootton Flitcham with Appleton West Rudham Harpley Helhoughton Hillington Marshland North Raynham Castle Rising Little Massingham Terrington St. Clement Freebridge Lynn Congham South Wootton Roydon Weasenham St. Peter Gaywood North & Central Grimston Great Massingham King's Lynn North & Central Weasenham All Saints Clenchwarton Tittleshall Clenchwarton
    [Show full text]
  • Delegated List.Pdf
    PLANNING COMMITTEE - APPLICATIONS DETERMINED UNDER DELEGATED POWERS PURPOSE OF REPORT To inform Members of those applications which have been determined under the officer delegation scheme since your last meeting. These decisions are made in accordance with the Authority’s powers contained in the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and have no financial implications. RECOMMENDATION That the report be noted. DETAILS OF DECISIONS DATE DATE REF NUMBER APPLICANT PARISH/AREA RECEIVED DETERMINED/ PROPOSED DEV DECISION 19.07.2017 29.08.2017 17/01398/F Mr & Mrs G Jeffries Crimplesham Application Bushell Main Road Crimplesham Permitted Norfolk Extension to bungalow and construction of garage 05.07.2017 30.08.2017 17/01285/F Pratt Family Partners Denver Application 57 Whin Common Road Denver Permitted Downham Market Norfolk single storey extension to dwelling 03.07.2017 24.08.2017 17/01261/F Mr Peter Clay Dersingham Application 28 Tudor Way Dersingham King's Permitted Lynn Norfolk Single storey extension to the front of the dwelling 07.07.2017 01.09.2017 17/01317/F Mr Johnston Dersingham Application Larkfield 10A Fern Hill Dersingham Permitted King's Lynn Variation of condition 2 of planning permission 16/00582/F to amend approved drawing 26.06.2017 30.08.2017 17/01221/F Mr & Mrs I Kissock Docking Application Land East of East End Cottage Refused Stanhoe Road Docking Norfolk Proposed new dwelling 28.06.2017 23.08.2017 17/01245/PACU5 Mr Mark Lorimer Docking Prior Approval - Docking Lodge Farm Fakenham Refused Road Docking Norfolk Prior Approval:
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Minerals and Waste Local Plan
    Appendix 2 Norfolk Minerals and Waste Local Plan Minerals Site Specific Allocations Development Plan Document: Single Issue Silica Sand Review October 2017 www.norfolk.gov.uk Norfolk Minerals and Waste Local Plan Minerals Site Specific Allocations DPD: Single Issue Silica Sand Review October 2017 T. McCabe – Executive Director Community and Environmental Services Norfolk County Council Martineau Lane Norwich NR1 2SG www.norfolk.gov.uk If you would need this document in large print, audio, braille, an alternative format or a different language please contact Norfolk County Council on 0344 800 8020 or 18001 0344 8020 (textphone) and we will do our best to help. 1 Modifications to the adopted Minerals Site Specific Allocations DPD The modification column of the table below, details the changes to be made to the adopted Minerals Site Specific Allocations Development Plan Document (DPD) due to the Single Issue Silica Sand Review. Text to be deleted is shown struck through and additional text to be added in shown in red and underlined. Paragraph/ Modification Page Contents List Policy SIL01 at Bawsey and the four areas of search and Area of Search page Policy into the contents list after Policy MIN 76, and amend the page numbers accordingly. 1.4 The following sites and areas of search are is allocated for silica sand extraction: Parish Site reference Estimated resource (tonnes) King’s Lynn and West Norfolk East Winch MIN 40 3,000,000 Bawsey SIL01 1,200,000 Wormegay, Shouldham, AOS E Unknown Marham, Shouldham Thorpe Runcton Holme, Stow AOS F Unknown Bardolph Shouldham Thorpe, AOS I Unknown Runcton Holme, Tottenhill Tottenhill, Wormegay AOS J Unknown TOTAL 4,200,000 2.7 No new silica sand planning permissions were granted in 2010, 2011 or 2012, from 2010 to 2016 and therefore the landbank of reserves has reduced accordingly (the latest confirmed landbank figure is 2.62 4.9 million tonnes as at 31 December 2016 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Poll
    NOTICE OF POLL Norfolk County Council Election of a County Councillor for Gayton and Nar Valley Electoral Division Notice is hereby given that: 1. A poll for the election of a County Councillor for Gayton and Nar Valley will be held on Thursday 4 May 2017, between the hours of 7:00 am and 10:00 pm. 2. The number of County Councillors to be elected is one. 3. The names, home addresses and descriptions of the Candidates remaining validly nominated for election and the names of all persons signing the Candidate's nomination paper are as follows: Names of Signatories Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Proposers(+), Seconders(++) & Assentors CORDEN 18 Innisfree Park UK Independence Bell John R(+) Bell Muriel G(++) John Barry Homes, Bawsey, King's Party (UKIP) Bedwell Alan A Watkins Stuart I Lynn, PE32 1EX Steward John L Lawrence Betty E Proudfoot Susan E Letts Rosamond Chown Hayley J Ratcliff Carol A MIDDLETON 81 Wisbech Road, The Conservative Party Donaldson Simon J(+) Stock Jacqueline H(++) Graham Robin Kings Lynn, Norfolk, Candidate Jolley Graham A Jolley Julie A PE30 5LA Smith Pauline Thompson Anne P Thompson Peter C Bloodworth Claire T Bloodworth Isaac C Hinson Diane MORGAN 3 Queen Street, Labour Party Moriarty James P(+) Marchbank Pearce(++) Natasha Dawn Swaffham, Norfolk, Candidate Loughlin Alison M Shelton Graham C PE37 7BZ Shelton Linda V Sliwa Ralph Sliwa Louisa Douglas Anthony P Thorneywork Eley John N Gwyneth E NIXON High Bank Cottage, Liberal Democrats Williams Charlotte(+) Mitchell Helen M(++) Andrew North Street, Castle French Jacqueline L Potter Carys L Acre, King's Lynn, Norton Judith A McKenna Bride M C Norfolk, PE32 2BA McKenna Niamh E B Ryan Timothy Howman Carl R Leman Samantha H M 4.
    [Show full text]