West College Request for Proposals

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

West College Request for Proposals Members of the Sonoma County Community Development Commission Commission Sonoma County Housing Authority James Gore 1440 Guerneville Road, Santa Rosa, CA 95403-4107 Chair David Rabbitt Vice Chair Susan Gorin Shirlee Zane Lynda Hopkins Request for Proposals for the Development of Margaret Van Vliet 2150 W. College Ave, Santa Rosa, CA Executive Director The Sonoma County Community Development Commission (Commission) is soliciting proposals from qualified development firms for the planning, design, construction and long-term management of an affordable housing community on its property at 2150 West College Ave in Santa Rosa, California. Qualified developers will demonstrate organizational capacity and experience with successful, high- quality mixed-income housing developments and property management. This document contains background information about the property and the general parameters of the envisioned housing development. Potential respondents are encouraged to ask for additional information, and to be innovative in their responses. Background Property Description The subject property is a 7.46-acre parcel located in incorporated Santa Rosa on the south side of West College Avenue near the intersection of Stony Point Road. Sited on the property is a collection of vacant buildings, including maintenance shops, offices and a small garage, all of which will presumably need to be demolished as part of the development project. Developable land on the parcel is approximately 5.7 acres after the apportionment of a creek trail and a maintenance easement dedication. The property is located in a mixed commercial and residential neighborhood. A transit transfer center with three bus lines is adjacent, providing readily accessible high-frequency public transportation to residents of this proposed community. Additional features include a community center and park within two blocks of the property. This property was declared as surplus by Sonoma County Water Agency in March 2014. In July 2017, the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors approved the sale of the property to the Commission for the appraised value of $4.2 million. After purchasing the property in 2017, the Commission held two community meetings to solicit stakeholder and neighbor input about the development of the property into mixed-income rental housing. Specific feedback from these meetings can be found in Attachment 6. Telephone (707) 565-7500 FAX (707) 565-7583 ● TDD (707) 565-7555 Project Objectives The loss of 5300 homes in the City of Santa Rosa and Sonoma County as a result of the fire disaster of October 2017 exacerbated an already existing housing shortage, especially for low- and moderate- income households. The Commission and the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors have prioritized production of housing, and intend to strategically use publicly owned property to achieve their goals of creating new housing opportunities. As such, the selection of a development partner and achievement of public policy goals on the subject property are of significant interest to the County of Sonoma. Innovative Economic Partnerships Sonoma County and the Commission are interested in pursuing innovative models of housing development on County-owned land that provide long-term economic benefits wherever possible. Examples could include (1) the use of a long-term ground lease that is structured to provide residual receipts payments to the Commission after a period of fifteen years; or (2) partnership structures that grant the Commission residual cash flow and/or a minority equity interest in the property over the long- term; or (3) option agreements structured to provide an opportunity for the County or Commission to consider ownership possibilities at natural recapitalization points, such as 20 or 30 years after commencement of operations. Proposers are encouraged to develop submissions that give consideration to such alternative economic structures, and to achievement of a substantial number of new rental units affordable to low-income families, seniors, and special needs populations (see Affordability, below). Affordability The City of Santa Rosa’s inclusionary policy establishes that a minimum of 15% of units must be affordable for a period of 55 years to households earning 80 percent of the area median income (AMI) or less. The Commission views this inclusionary percentage as a minimum and will give priority to proposals that can achieve greater levels of affordability, even on mixed income units that are proposed to not carry deed restrictions, without requiring additional local or state competitive funding. Submissions should explain how affordability will be achieved, including how the $4.2 million investment made by the Commission in the property will be treated within the project economics; the ways in which development and construction costs will be minimized to allow units that are not rent- restricted to meet current market needs; and the methods by which the development will balance the goal of expeditiously bringing units on line with the objective of driving affordability for lower-wage working families and individuals. Collaboration with the Commission Because the subject site is critically important to the overall goals of Sonoma County, the Commission has an interest in collaborating during the development process and as such will enter into an Exclusive Right to Negotiate Agreement (ERNA) with the selected developer in order to solidify the project economics and approach. A Development and Disposition Agreement (DDA) will be used to memorialize the agreements. 2 Community Process The Commission expects the selected developer to pro-actively engage the neighborhood surrounding the property, to promote an open communication process, develop an understanding of neighborhood issues, and develop a final project that responds to any pertinent neighborhood concerns. The developer should provide a narrative that describes the planned outreach process and the experience the developer has with this type of process. Developer Qualifications Capacity The Commission is seeking a developer with substantial financial capacity, access to credit, and real estate development experience. Interested parties should submit financial statements and other evi- dence of bank relationships sufficient to demonstrate financial strength. These documents will be considered proprietary and will not be subject to disclosure as part of public records. Track Record with Quality Development Projects Developers should provide information and descriptions of past development projects, including photographs, sample project data, examples of financial modeling, and how such past projects or buildings have performed since initial construction. Information that clearly demonstrates the ability to execute quickly on this development opportunity should be provided. Successful Property Management Experience The Commission is seeking a developer with experience effectively managing its completed properties, whether in-house or in partnership with a qualified third-party property management company. This includes affirmatively marketing available units to historically under-served and non-English speaking populations, demonstrating a clear commitment to the principals of fair housing, and designing lease requirements to ensure that a peaceful and safe environment is maintained for tenants and neighbors of the property. Development Standards and Entitlement The project must be consistent with the applicable policies in the City of Santa Rosa’s General Plan and the design guidelines set forth in the Development Code. To the extent that the City anticipates changes to the Plan and/or the Code to increase density, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, or pursue other public policy goals, the project should anticipate how it can meet such future-oriented objectives. The property is currently zoned R-3-30 which would potentially allow the development of approximately 170 units of housing on the 5.7 acres available for development. The remaining 1.76 acres make up the College Creek Flood Control Channel on which the Water Agency will reserve an easement to retain access for maintenance and operation of the channel. 3 The development of a multi-family project on the site may involve the following discretionary approvals: • Use Permit approval by the City’s Planning Commission. • Planned Development approval by the City’s Planning Commission, if changes from the quantified standards of the Development Code are proposed. • Design review by the City’s Design Review Commission and a Citizen’s Advisory Committee. Proposers should evaluate and describe the type of environmental review that they believe would be required for their proposed project. Summary of Developer and Commission responsibilities Once the ERNA is executed, the Commission anticipates that the successful Developer will undertake the following: • Establish a fair, effective, and collaborative partnership with the Commission. • Work collaboratively with the community during the planning and development process. • Prepare a development plan in collaboration with the Commission, which meets the Commis- sion’s development objectives and incorporates input from the City of Santa Rosa during its pre- application review process. • Lead and manage the land use and environmental entitlement process. • Provide funding for the predevelopment and planning process. • Negotiate and obtain approval of a Development and Disposition Agreement with the Commis- sion during the
Recommended publications
  • Downtown Station Area Specific Plan Program EIR
    Final Program EIR D OWNTOWN S TATION A REA S PECIFIC P LAN P ROGRAM EIR State Clearinghouse Number: 2006072104 ND lr IG oad HWAY OCINO AVE 11TH ST KLUTE ST LODI ST B ST 101 10TH ST 10TH ST 5T MAXWELLELL CTC B ST SCOTT ST RILEY ST MORGAN ST A ST 8TH ST 7TH ST WILSON STDAVIS ST KINGWOOD ST ROSS ST A PALOMINO DR S T 8TH ST 14 4TH ST D ST W 8TH ST 7TH ST N DUTTONAVE T ROWBRIDGE S T T 6TH ST S 2ND ST 5TH SANTA ROSA AVE HEWETT A ST ST T 1ST ST H S 4T RAILROAD ST DUNCAN ST PIERSONPIP ST TUPPER K A AVE A CREE M ROS SONO ANTA E S JUILLIARD CHARL ST T T S A ST PARK O L IVE S W 3RD ST MILL S T B PINE S O S HIGHWAY 12 L E OAK S Y S Submitted to City of Santa Rosa June 29, 2007 Prepared by: City of Santa Rosa, Advanced Planning and Public Policy Department Lead EIR Consultant: DESIGN, COMMUNITY & ENVIRONMENT Final Program EIR D OWNTOWN S TATION A REA S PECIFIC P LAN P ROGRAM EIR State Clearinghouse Number: 2006072104 Submitted to City of Santa Rosa June 29, 2007 Prepared by: City of Santa Rosa, Advanced Planning and Public Policy Department Lead EIR Consultant: DESIGN, COMMUNITY & ENVIRONMENT 1625 SHATTUCK AVENUE, SUITE 300 TEL: 510 848 3815 BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94709 FAX: 510 848 4315 in association with: Coastland Civil Engineering Questa Engineering Corporation Garcia & Associatesay Group Whitlock & Weinberger Tranportation Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Staff Report Meeting Date
    J-7 STAFF REPORT 922 Machin Avenue MEETING Novato, CA 94945 DATE: July 24, 2018 (415) 899-8900 FAX (415) 899-8213 www.novato.org TO: City Council FROM: Regan M. Candelario, City Manager Russ Thompson, Public Works Director Chris Blunk, Deputy Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO APPROVING A FUNDING AGREEMENT WITH THE SONOMA-MARIN AREA RAIL TRANSIT (SMART) FOR PHASE II OF THE DOWNTOWN STATION PROJECT; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT AND MAKING A DETERMINATION THAT NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL THEREOF REQUEST Consider and possibly take action to adopt a resolution to: 1. Approve a Funding Agreement with SMART in the amount of $5,214,000 to complete the Downtown Novato SMART Station (Downtown Station); 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Funding Agreement; and 3. Make the finding that no further environmental review is required under CEQA for approval thereof based on the findings and facts set forth in Novato City Council Resolution 12-16, Section 4, adopted on February 9, 2018. BACKGROUND On October 6, 2015, the City Council agreed to fund a feasibility study performed by SMART that considered the costs and operational impacts of a third SMART station in downtown Novato (Downtown Station.) SMART determined that it was possible to serve the Novato North Station and the Downtown Station on an alternating stop basis. After considerable debate and input from the public, the Council approved moving forward with a phased approach to the Downtown Station project with the caveat that overall costs would be higher if the project was not built as a single phase and that future phases could also exceed initial cost estimates.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures
    Chapter 3: Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures Introduction 3. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 3.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter presents information on existing environmental conditions in the area surrounding the proposed project and examines the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project for the following environmental topic areas: • Geology, Soils and Seismicity • Biological Resources (Wetlands, Vegetation and Wildlife) • Water Resources • Parks and Recreation • Hazardous Materials • Land Use and Planning • Air Quality • Public Facilities and Safety • Transportation (Traffic, Transit, Bicycle, and Pedestrian) • Visual/Aesthetics • Noise and Vibration • Historic Resources • Energy • Archaeological Resources The chapter is organized by issue area; each section in the chapter presents the study area (area of potential effect), regulatory setting that pertains to the topical area, the environmental setting (existing conditions and affected environment), significance criteria used to assess the impacts, methodology for assessing impacts within that issue area, summary of impact findings, identification of specific construction-related and long-term impacts of the proposed project on that environment, mitigation measures to avoid or reduce impacts and a discussion of cumulative impacts. In addition, the impact analysis in each section classifies the impacts based on the significance criteria. While Chapter 3 focuses on the impacts of the proposed project, alternatives to the proposed project are discussed in Chapter 4. 3.1.1 Assessment Methodology Study Area For each resource listed above, a study area was established based on the “area of potential effect.” The geographical boundaries of this study area vary among the issue areas. In some cases, the study area is broader than the project corridor and station and maintenance facility sites to factor in any direct or indirect impacts that may occur on resources adjacent to, but outside the area of physical disturbance.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Historic Resources
    4. HISTORIC RESOURCES Downtown Station Area Specific Plan Update DRAFT Existing Conditions Report This Historic Resources Existing Conditions Chapter for the Santa Rosa By the nineteenth century, Spanish exploration of the Bay Area radically Downtown Station Area Specific Plan provides a brief historic context changed Southern Pomo culture. Between 1821 and 1828, Spanish of Santa Rosa’s Downtown, summarizes the historic resource regulatory missionaries moved many of the Southern Pomo from the Santa Rosa framework and the known historic resources within the planning area, Plain to Mission San Rafael, at present-day San Rafael. The Pomo discusses City and state plans and laws that may affect historic resources suffered from infectious diseases such as measles and smallpox, and in the planning area, and outlines key findings and planning fatalities were high. Following Mexican independence in 1821 and considerations. secularization of the missions in 1834, large ranchos were established by Mexican citizens. 4.1 Historic Context of Downtown Santa The future city of Santa Rosa was settled by Dona Maria Carrillo and nine of her adult children in 1837. Carrillo, who was the mother-in-law Rosa of General Vallejo and aunt of Mexican governor Pio Pico, was granted an 8,800-acre ranch in 1841, Rancho Cabeza de Santa Rosa, which The following is a brief history of the physical development of encompasses most of Santa Rosa today. By the time the United States downtown Santa Rosa over time. annexed California from Mexico and established statehood in 1850, numerous settlers occupied farms in the Santa Rosa area. The land that now constitutes the City of Santa Rosa was first inhabited by the Southern Pomo tribe.
    [Show full text]
  • CONFIDENTIAL OFFERING DE TURK WINERY VILLAGE | HIGH DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY Santa Rosa, CA | Sonoma County
    CONFIDENTIAL OFFERING DE TURK WINERY VILLAGE | HIGH DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY Santa Rosa, CA | Sonoma County Bldg A Design Review Approval & Approval for Landmark Alteration Permit for 185 Multi-Family Units, Plus Approximately 25,000 Sq. Ft. of Existing Type 'A' Commercial Building Within the Downtown Santa Rosa Station Area Specific Plan - Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Located in Downtown Santa Rosa in the West End & North Railroad Square Preservation Rhonda Deringer, Partner Keegan & Coppin Company, Inc. [email protected] ONCOR INTERNATIONAL BRE Lic #: 01206401 1355 N. Dutton Ave, Santa Rosa, CA 95401 707.528.1400 x 267 | www.KeeganCoppin.com The above information, while not guaranteed, has been secured from sources we believe to be reliable. Submitted subject to error, change or withdrawal. An interested party should verify the status of the property and the information herein. Keegan & Coppin Company, Inc. 2017. CONFIDENTIAL OFFERING DE TURK WINERY VILLAGE | HIGH DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY Santa Rosa, CA | Sonoma County TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 Summary SECTION 2 Unit Composition SECTION 3 Overview SECTION 4 Location Description SECTION 5 History & Preservation of Structures SECTION 6 Architectural Plans & Renderings SECTION 7 Income & Expense Summary SECTION 8 Rent Roll SECTION 8 Location Description SECTION 9 Market Overview SECTION 10 SMART - Transit Station SECTION 11 Photos & Aerials SECTION 12 Location Maps / Downtown Maps SECTION 12 Disclaimer View Northwest The above information, while not guaranteed, has been secured from sources we believe to be reliable. Submitted subject to error, change or withdrawal. An interested party should verify the status of the property and the information herein.
    [Show full text]
  • CONFIDENTIAL OFFERING DE TURK WINERY VILLAGE | HIGH DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY Santa Rosa, CA | Sonoma County
    CONFIDENTIAL OFFERING DE TURK WINERY VILLAGE | HIGH DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY Santa Rosa, CA | Sonoma County Bldg A Proposed Site Plan – Approved Design Review Approval for 185 Multi-Family Housing Units, Plus Approximately 18,602 Sq. Ft. of Existing Commercial Buildings Within the Downtown Santa Rosa Station Area Specific Plan - Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Rhonda Deringer, Partner James P. Sartain, SREA Brian Keegan, SREA Keegan & Coppin Company, Inc. [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 1355 N. Dutton Ave, Santa Rosa, CA 95401 Lic #: 01206401 Lic #: 01227927 Lic #: 01809537 707.528.1400 x 267 | www.KeeganCoppin.com The above information, while not guaranteed, has been secured from sources we believe to be reliable. Submitted subject to error, change or withdrawal. An interested party should verify the status of the property and the information herein. Keegan & Coppin Company, Inc. 2019 CONFIDENTIAL OFFERING DE TURK WINERY VILLAGE | HIGH DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY Santa Rosa, CA | Sonoma County TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 Summary SECTION 2 Unit Composition SECTION 3 Overview SECTION 4 Architectural Plans & Renderings SECTION 5 History & Preservation of Structures SECTION 6 Location Description SECTION 7 Photos & Aerials SECTION 8 Location Description SECTION 9 Market Overview SECTION 10 SMART - Transit Station SECTION 11 Location Maps / Downtown Maps SECTION 12 Disclaimer View Northwest The above information, while not guaranteed, has been secured from
    [Show full text]