Communication & Information for Advocacy in Kajiado
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Monitoring WASH and WRM Election Promises in Kenya
Briefing Paper│ October 2019 About Watershed Monitoring WASH and WRM Election Promises in Kenya Watershed empowering citizens programme is a strategic partnership Executive Summary between the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, IRC, Simavi, Wetlands International and Akvo. During Election campaign periods in Kenya, aspiring leaders share manifestos to the electorate with the promises of Watershed aims at delivering what they intend to deliver once they are elected into improvements in the governance different positions. and management of water, sanitation and hygiene services as One of the major challenges has been the lack of a well as of the water resources on framework to monitor and track the progress of these which they draw. promises. For this reason, Watershed partners in Kenya led Watershed is implemented in Kenya, by KEWASNET and Akvo came together and developed a Uganda, Mali, Ghana, Bangladesh Water Resources Management (WRM) – Water Sanitation and India. The long-term objective of and Hygiene (WASH) Monitoring tool. Watershed is improved governance for WASH and IWRM so that all This was done using Akvo’s RSR (Really Simple Reporting) citizens, including the most result framework, to monitor promises made by governors marginalised, can benefit from sustainable services. in the focus counties (Laikipia and Kajiado), Nairobi, and the president of Kenya during last year's elections. This paper The immediate goal is to enhance presents the status reports. citizens’ ability to obtain information so that civil society organisations Introduction (CSOs) can advocate for change based on reliable, accurate data. On 22 February 2018, the Watershed team in Kenya comprising of KEWASNET, CESPAD, NIA and Akvo came together in Nakuru to design the result indicator framework for Kenya Watershed team to monitor WRM-WASH CONTACT: [email protected] promises made by governors and the president of Kenya during last year's elections. -
Herbivore Dynamics and Range Contraction in Kajiado County Kenya: Climate and Land Use Changes, Population Pressures, Governance, Policy and Human-Wildlife Conflicts
Send Orders for Reprints to [email protected] The Open Ecology Journal, 2014, 7, 9-31 9 Open Access Herbivore Dynamics and Range Contraction in Kajiado County Kenya: Climate and Land Use Changes, Population Pressures, Governance, Policy and Human-wildlife Conflicts Joseph O. Ogutu1,2,*, Hans-Peter Piepho1, Mohammed Y. Said2 and Shem C. Kifugo2 1University of Hohenheim, Institute for Crop Science-340, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany 2International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709-00100, Nairobi, Kenya Abstract: Wildlife populations are declining severely in many protected areas and unprotected pastoral areas of Africa. Rapid large-scale land use changes, poaching, climate change, rising population pressures, governance, policy, economic and socio-cultural transformations and competition with livestock all contribute to the declines in abundance. Here we analyze the population dynamics of 15 wildlife and four livestock species monitored using aerial surveys from 1977 to 2011 within Kajiado County of Kenya, with a rapidly expanding human population, settlements, cultivation and other developments. The abundance of the 14 most common wildlife species declined by 67% on average (2% / yr) between 1977 and 2011 in both Eastern (Amboseli Ecosystem) and Western Kajiado. The species that declined the most were buffalo, impala, wildebeest, waterbuck, oryx, hartebeest, Thomson’s gazelle and gerenuk in Eastern Kajiado (70% to 88%) and oryx, hartebeest, impala, buffalo, waterbuck, giraffe, eland and gerenuk in Western Kajiado (77% to 99%). Only elephant (115%) and ostrich (216%) numbers increased contemporaneously in Eastern and Western Kajiado, respectively. Cattle and donkey numbers also decreased on average by 78% in Eastern Kajiado and by 37% in Western Kajiado. -
CONTENTS Pg 05 1 Governor’S Welcome Pg 07 2 Flagship Project: Hay Production Pg 11 3 Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries and Cooperatives A
CONTENTS pg 05 1 Governor’s Welcome pg 07 2 Flagship Project: Hay Production pg 11 3 Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries and Cooperatives A. Agriculture B. Livestock C. Cooperatives pg 24 4 Health pg 33 5 Flagship Project: Level 5 Hospital pg 34 6 Flagship Projects: Level 4 Hospitals CONTENTS pg 37 7 Education and Vocational Training A. Education B. Vocational Training pg 47 8 Lands, Physical Planning and Urban Development A. Lands B. Physical Planning pg 57 9 Public Works, Roads, Housing and Energy pg 65 10 Trade, Tourism and Industrialization pg 73 11 Water, Irrigation, Environment and Natural Resources Pg 5 Kajiado County Government Governor’s 1 Delivery Unit: One Year Progress Report s we arrive at the one year mark of my governance, I continue to be honored and feel a great Asense of both privilege and responsibility to serve in this coveted leadership role. I cherish Governor’s working with my team to set policy, make decisions and deliver services that impact on the lives of the people of Kajiado County. Together we are building a better county and our Welcome unity and the solidarity in our efforts are a role model for other counties. Today, we can take comfort in the fact that through our complementary efforts as the executive and legislative branches of our Government, we are able to make substantial progress towards promoting the well-being of the people of Kajiado County. Notwithstanding the challenges on the way, our County will continue to move forward along the path of inclusive development. While a journey towards a more perfect society in an imperfect world can never be complete, our own progress continues to be marked by measurable milestones contained in our longterm Vision 2030, National Development Plans, the Sustainable Development Goals and our County Integrated Development Plan II. -
Kajiado County Renewable Energy Atlas
KAJIADO COUNTY RENEWABLE ENERGY ATLAS KAJIADO COUNTY RENEWABLE ENERGY ATLAS ALIN (2020) Kajiado County Renewable Energy Atlas Arid Lands Information Network (ALIN) 1st floor AAYMCA Building, State House Crescent off State House Avenue P.O. Box 10098 – 00100, Nairobi - KENYA This Atlas was prepared by ALIN in close collaboration with the Kajiado County Government, as represented by the Ministry of Water, Irrigation, Environment and Natural Resources with support from the Hivos Green and Inclusive Energy Programme. Copyright ©2020 Arid Lands Information Network (ALIN) Unless otherwise stated, material in this publication may be freely used, shared, copied, reproduced, printed and/or stored for educational or non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate acknowledgement is given of ALIN as the source and copyright holder. Reproduction of the publication for resale or other commercial purposes is however strictly prohibited, except with prior written permission from the copyright holder. About ALIN The Arid Lands Information Network (ALIN) is a non-governmental organization (NGO) registered in Kenya with over 20 years’ experience working on sustainable development issues by providing a grass-root link to policy matters in addition to empowerment activities. ALIN has been championing the use of ICTs to empower communities with usable information and knowledge to improve their livelihoods. www.alin.net Cover Design and layout by: Ngugi Wathuge Printed by: Regal Press Ltd ii Table of Content List of tables and figures ....................................................................................................................................v -
Kenya HIV County Profiles
KENYA HIV COUNTY PROFILES ELIMINA TE NEW HIV INFECTION AMONG CHILDREN PREVENT HIV AMONG ACCESSING DRUG USERS TRE ATMENT CLOSING THE REOURCE GAP 2014 Contents Preface ............................................................................1 Makueni County ....................................................76 Background .....................................................................6 Mandera County ...................................................79 National Overview of the Epidemic ...............................8 Marsabit County ....................................................82 HIv and AIdS County Profiles ........................................9 Meru County .........................................................85 Baringo County .....................................................10 Migori County .......................................................88 Bomet County .......................................................13 Mombasa County ..................................................91 Bungoma County ..................................................16 Murang’a County ..................................................94 Busia County .........................................................19 Nairobi County ......................................................97 Elgeyo Marakwet County ......................................22 Nakuru County ....................................................100 Embu County ........................................................25 Nandi County ......................................................103 -
Kajiado LRA 2013 Report Final.Pdf (English)
KAJIADO COUNTY 2013 LONG RAINS FOOD SECURITY ASSESSMENT REPORT 5TH AUGUST – 10TH AUGUST 2013 Assessment team: Thomas Kang’ethe Ministry of Water and Natural Resource Geoffrey Kimathi World Food Programme County Steering Group Kajiado Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 County background ............................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Current of Relief Operations................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Food Security Trends ............................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Current Factors affecting Food Security .............................................................................. 2 1.5 Summary of recommendations – food and non-food .......................................................... 3 2.0 COUNTY FOOD SECURITY SITUATION ...................................................................... 3 2.1 Current food security situation ............................................................................................. 3 2.2 Current Shocks Hazard ......................................................................................................... 3 3.0 IMPACT OF SHOCK AND HAZARDS ............................................................................ 4 3.1 CROP PRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... -
Kajiado County - Wikipedia
8/25/2018 Kajiado County - Wikipedia Coordinates: 2°S 36.8667°E Kajiado County Kajiado County is a county in the former Rift Valley Province of Kenya. It has a population of 687,312 and an area of 21,292.7 km².[1] (http://www.statoids.com/yke.html) The county borders Nairobi and extends to the Tanzania border further south. The county capital is Kajiado County Kajiado but the largest town is Ngong. Its main tourist attraction is wildlife. County Contents Administration Constituencies Services Nairobi Metro Stats Coat of arms Urbanisation Wealth/Poverty Level See also See also References External links Administration Local authorities (councils) Authority Type Population Urban pop. size Kajiado Town 12,204 9,128 Location in Kenya Olkejuado County 393,850 71,223 Country Kenya Total - 406,054 80,351 Formed March 4th 2013 * 1999 census. Source: [2] (http://treasury.go.ke/cbs.go.ke/pdf/authority.pdf) Capital Kajiado The county is divided into seven administrative divisions. The newly created Isinya division is not included in the following table based Government on 1999 census: • Governor Joseph Ole Lenku Area Administrative divisions • Total 21,292.7 km2 (8,221.2 sq mi) Division Population* Urban pop.* Headquarters Population (2009) Central 69,402 16,444 Kajiado • Total 687,312 [1] Time zone EAT (UTC+3) Loitokitok 95,430 7,495 Loitokitok Website kajiado.go.ke (https://w Magadi 20,112 0 Magadi ww.kajiado.go.ke) Mashuru 35,666 2,248 Mashuru Namanga 35,673 5,503 Namanga Ngong 149,771 20,657 Ngong Total 406,054 38,299 - * 1999 census. -
A Gis-Based Investigation of the Effects of Physical Access on Primary School Enrolment
University of Nairobi School of Engineering A GIS-BASED INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF PHYSICAL ACCESS ON PRIMARY SCHOOL ENROLMENT: Case study of Loitokitok Sub County. BY John Mwangi Maina F56/80753/2012 A Project report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Geographic Information Systems. Department of Geospatial and Space Technology May 2014 Declaration I, John Mwangi Maina, hereby declare that this project is my original work. To the best of my knowledge, the work presented here has not been presented for a degree in any other university. John Mwangi Maina .………………… ………………. Name of student Signature Date This project report has been submitted for examination with my approval as university supervisor. Professor G.C.Mulaku ………………… ………………… Name of supervisor Signature Date ii Dedication This project is dedicated to my mother Kellen and my Spouse Ann. iii Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge the advice accorded by my supervisor Professor G. C. Mulaku of the Department of Geospatial and Space Technology, University of Nairobi, which enabled me to successfully complete the project. I would also like to acknowledge the assistance of my colleagues at Survey of Kenya; Mr Nyangweso and Mr Silali, who assisted me in various ways during data collection for the project. iv Abstract Education is considered as one of the most effective ways to reduce poverty, give people opportunities to improve their lives and raise their voice, improve their health, productivity and foster participation in civil society activities. It has been noted that increasing the number of pupils who finish school leads to economic growth, social and political stability, decline in the crime rate, and improved social services.