Cliff Stabilization

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cliff Stabilization Climate Change Adaptation Technologies for Water A practitioner’s guide to adaptation technologies for increased water sector resilience WATER ADAPTATION TECHNOLOGY BRIEF Cliff stabilization Challenge: Sea level rise Adaptation response: Green infrastructure for shoreline protection Description Cliff stabilization relates to measures carried out to minimize erosion of sloping soft rock coasts. The coasts are susceptible to erosion due to their relatively loose sediment, which is vulnerable to erosive forces such as waves, wind, tides, near-shore currents, storms and sea level rise. Cliff stabilization measures may take a wide variety of forms, including foot traffic protection, re-grading, smoothing, increasing vegetative cover and improving drainage. It can be implemented alongside various soft and hard coastal management measures. Cliff stabilization can be a useful option in densely populated areas with high value properties and infrastructure built on sloping soft rock coasts. Cliff stabilization can thus prevent erosion of valuable land and maintain the current coastline. Implementation Cliff stabilization addresses foot and slope erosion fro, targeting geo-technical instability and subsequent sliding/collapse of the slope. A number of measures may be taken to address these issues, including: Construction of revetments at the cliff foot; artificial smoothing or re-grading of the slope; smoothing the slope by filling it with granular material at the foot of the cliff; establishing vegetative cliff cover to protect against weathering and groundwater seepage; groundwater drainage to prevent the cliff from sliding due to high water pressure; and slope reinforcement through the use of piles to transfer load to an intact geological under layer. Addressing foreshore erosion through hard or soft coastal protection measures is also an integral component of cliff stabilization. Environmental Benefits - Maintains the amenity value of cliffs, which can be important for recreation and tourism. - Retains the cliff’s natural appearance, if stabilized responsively, and does not adversely affect the local landscape. Socioeconomic Benefits - Prevents erosion of valuable properties and infrastructure. - Lends itself to, and is well suited for, implementation alongside other adaptation responses. Opportunities and Barriers Opportunities: - Can be a useful management option for coastal stabilization in densely populated areas, and can improve public safety in areas where cliffs are in danger of slipping or collapsing - Is a low-tech option that can be implemented by a skilled contractor Barriers: - Eroding cliffs are part of the natural coastal landscape and a source of sediment to the coastal system. They should therefore be kept unaltered where possible to allow additional supply to Download full publication from: http://www.unepdhi.org/publications Climate Change Adaptation Technologies for Water A practitioner’s guide to adaptation technologies for increased water sector resilience WATER ADAPTATION TECHNOLOGY BRIEF coastal sediment - Smoothing and re-grading of slopes causes land loss, which can be problematic in densely populated areas - If not implemented carefully, artificial smoothing or re-grading can detrimentally affect an environment’s ecosystem or aesthetic value - Can foster the spread of invasive species if their presence is not appropriately addressed Implementation considerations* Technological maturity: 3-4 Initial investment: 1-3 Operational costs: 1-3 Implementation timeframe: 1-3 * This adaptation technology brief includes a general assessment of four dimensions relating to implementation of the technology. It represents an indicative assessment scale of 1-5 as follows: Technological maturity: 1 - in early stages of research and development, to 5 – fully mature and widely used Initial investment: 1 – very low cost, to 5 – very high cost investment needed to implement technology Operational costs: 1 – very low/no cost, to 5 – very high costs of operation and maintenance Implementation timeframe: 1 – very quick to implement and reach desired capacity, to 5 – significant time investments needed to establish and/or reach full capacity This assessment is to be used as an indication only and is to be seen as relative to the other technologies included in this guide. More specific costs and timelines are to be identified as relevant for the specific technology and geography. Download full publication from: http://www.unepdhi.org/publications Climate Change Adaptation Technologies for Water A practitioner’s guide to adaptation technologies for increased water sector resilience WATER ADAPTATION TECHNOLOGY BRIEF Sources and further information Clark, A.R. and Fort, S. (2009). Recent UK experience of coastal cliff stabilisation. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Geotechnical Engineering, 162 (GE1), pp. 49-58. Available at: http://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/doi/10.1680/geng.2009.162.1.49 Davis Jr, R.A., Fitzgerald D.M. (2004); Beaches and coasts. Blackwell Publishing. Eurosion (2004). Living with coastal erosion in Europe: Sediment and space for sustainability. Part IV – A guide to coastal erosion management practices in Europe: Lessons learned. The Hague: National Institute for Coastal and Marine Environment / RIKZ. Accessed online 02-12-16 at http://www.eurosion.org/reports-online/part4.pdf. Haslett, S.K. (2009). Coastal systems. Routledge. Mangor, K. (2004). Shoreline management guidelines. DHI Water & Environment. Available at: https://www.dhigroup.com/marine-water/ebook-shoreline-management-guidelines Masselink, G., Hughes, M.G. (2003). Introduction to coastal processes and geomorphology. Oxford University Press. Rosendahl Appelquist, L. et al. (2017). The Coastal Hazard Wheel system, available online at www.coastalhazardwheel.org. Rosendahl Appelquist, L., Balstrøm, T., Halsnæs, K. (2016). Managing climate change hazards in coastal areas - The Coastal Hazard Wheel decision-support system, UNEP. Schwartz, M.L. (2005). Encyclopaedia of coastal science, Springer. Download full publication from: http://www.unepdhi.org/publications .
Recommended publications
  • Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report
    Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report JUNE 2017 CENTRAL COAST WETLANDS GROUP MOSS LANDING MARINE LABS | 8272 MOSS LANDING RD, MOSS LANDING, CA Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report This page intentionally left blank Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report i Prepared by Central Coast Wetlands Group at Moss Landing Marine Labs Technical assistance provided by: ESA Revell Coastal The Nature Conservancy Center for Ocean Solutions Prepared for The County of Santa Cruz Funding Provided by: The California Ocean Protection Council Grant number C0300700 Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report ii Primary Authors: Central Coast Wetlands group Ross Clark Sarah Stoner-Duncan Jason Adelaars Sierra Tobin Kamille Hammerstrom Acknowledgements: California State Ocean Protection Council Abe Doherty Paige Berube Nick Sadrpour Santa Cruz County David Carlson City of Capitola Rich Grunow Coastal Conservation and Research Jim Oakden Science Team David Revell, Revell Coastal Bob Battalio, ESA James Gregory, ESA James Jackson, ESA GIS Layer support AMBAG Santa Cruz County Adapt Monterey Bay Kelly Leo, TNC Sarah Newkirk, TNC Eric Hartge, Center for Ocean Solution Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report iii Contents Contents Summary of Findings ........................................................................................................................ viii 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cover and Final Landform Design for the B-Zone Waste Rock Pile at Rabbit Lake Mine
    Cover and final landform design for the B-zone waste rock pile at Rabbit Lake Mine Brian Ayres1, Pat Landine2, Les Adrian2, Dave Christensen1, Mike O’Kane1 1O’Kane Consultants Inc., Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada 2Cameco Corporation, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada Abstract. A detailed study was undertaken to evaluate various cover system and final landform designs for the B-zone waste rock pile at Rabbit Lake Mine in Can- ada. Several tasks were completed including physical and hydraulic characteriza- tion of the waste and potential cover materials and numerical modelling to exam- ine erosion and slope stability. Soil-atmosphere numeric simulations were conducted to predict net infiltration and oxygen ingress rates through several cover system alternatives. A seepage numerical modelling programme was com- pleted to predict current and future seepage rates from the base of the pile for al- ternate cover system designs. Several final landform alternatives were developed for the pile along with a preliminary design for a surface water management sys- tem. The potential impact of various physical, chemical, and biological processes on the sustainable performance of the final landform was also considered. This paper provides an overview of the investigations completed towards the develop- ment of a cover system and final landform design for the B-zone waste rock pile. Introduction Rabbit Lake Mine, owned and operated by Cameco Corporation, began operation in 1975, and is the longest operating uranium production facility in Saskatchewan, Canada. The operation is located 700 km north of Saskatoon (Fig. 1). Historic and current operations at this site include four open pits, one underground mine, sev- eral mine waste storage facilities, and a mill.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Did the Southern Gulf of California Rupture So Rapidly?—Oblique Divergence Across Hot, Weak Lithosphere Along a Tectonically Active Margin
    Why did the Southern Gulf of California rupture so rapidly?—Oblique divergence across hot, weak lithosphere along a tectonically active margin breakup, is mainly dependent on the thermal structure, crust- Paul J. Umhoefer, Geology Program, School of Earth Sciences & Environmental Sustainability, Northern Arizona University, al thickness, and crustal strength of the lithosphere when Flagstaff, Arizona 86011, USA; [email protected] rifting begins (e.g., Buck, 2007), as well as forces at the base of the lithosphere and far-field plate interactions (Ziegler and Cloetingh, 2004). ABSTRACT Continental rupture at its two extremes creates either large Rifts in the interior of continents that evolve to form large ocean basins or small and narrow marginal seas depending oceans typically last for 30 to 80 m.y. and longer before com- largely on the tectonic setting of the rift. Rupture of a conti- plete rupture of the continent and onset of sea-floor spreading. nent that creates large oceans most commonly initiates as A distinct style of rifts form along the active tectonic margins of rifts in old, cold continental lithosphere or within former continents, and these rifts more commonly form marginal seas large collisional belts in the interior of large continents, part and terranes or continental blocks or slivers that are ruptured of the process known as the Wilson Cycle (Wilson, 1966). away from their home continent. The Gulf of California and the Rupture to create narrow marginal seas commonly occurs in Baja California microplate make up one of the best examples active continental margins and results in the formation of of the latter setting and processes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gulf of Mexico Workshop on International Research, March 29–30, 2017, Houston, Texas
    OCS Study BOEM 2019-045 Proceedings: The Gulf of Mexico Workshop on International Research, March 29–30, 2017, Houston, Texas U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Gulf of Mexico OCS Region OCS Study BOEM 2019-045 Proceedings: The Gulf of Mexico Workshop on International Research, March 29–30, 2017, Houston, Texas Editors Larry McKinney, Mark Besonen, Kim Withers Prepared under BOEM Contract M16AC00026 by Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies Texas A&M University–Corpus Christi 6300 Ocean Drive Corpus Christi, TX 78412 Published by U.S. Department of the Interior New Orleans, LA Bureau of Ocean Energy Management July 2019 Gulf of Mexico OCS Region DISCLAIMER Study collaboration and funding were provided by the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Environmental Studies Program, Washington, DC, under Agreement Number M16AC00026. This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM, and it has been approved for publication. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the US Government, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. REPORT AVAILABILITY To download a PDF file of this report, go to the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management website at https://www.boem.gov/Environmental-Studies-EnvData/, click on the link for the Environmental Studies Program Information System (ESPIS), and search on 2019-045. CITATION McKinney LD, Besonen M, Withers K (editors) (Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Corpus Christi, Texas).
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal and Ocean Engineering
    May 18, 2020 Coastal and Ocean Engineering John Fenton Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources Management Vienna University of Technology, Karlsplatz 13/222, 1040 Vienna, Austria URL: http://johndfenton.com/ URL: mailto:[email protected] Abstract This course introduces maritime engineering, encompassing coastal and ocean engineering. It con- centrates on providing an understanding of the many processes at work when the tides, storms and waves interact with the natural and human environments. The course will be a mixture of descrip- tion and theory – it is hoped that by understanding the theory that the practicewillbemadeallthe easier. There is nothing quite so practical as a good theory. Table of Contents References ....................... 2 1. Introduction ..................... 6 1.1 Physical properties of seawater ............. 6 2. Introduction to Oceanography ............... 7 2.1 Ocean currents .................. 7 2.2 El Niño, La Niña, and the Southern Oscillation ........10 2.3 Indian Ocean Dipole ................12 2.4 Continental shelf flow ................13 3. Tides .......................15 3.1 Introduction ...................15 3.2 Tide generating forces and equilibrium theory ........15 3.3 Dynamic model of tides ...............17 3.4 Harmonic analysis and prediction of tides ..........19 4. Surface gravity waves ..................21 4.1 The equations of fluid mechanics ............21 4.2 Boundary conditions ................28 4.3 The general problem of wave motion ...........29 4.4 Linear wave theory .................30 4.5 Shoaling, refraction and breaking ............44 4.6 Diffraction ...................50 4.7 Nonlinear wave theories ...............51 1 Coastal and Ocean Engineering John Fenton 5. The calculation of forces on ocean structures ...........54 5.1 Structural element much smaller than wavelength – drag and inertia forces .....................54 5.2 Structural element comparable with wavelength – diffraction forces ..56 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Cambrian Hard Substrate Communities from Montana/ Wyoming: the Oldest Known Hardground Encrusters
    Late Cambrian hard substrate communities from Montana/ Wyoming: the oldest known hardground encrusters CARLTON E. BREIT, W. DAVID LIDDELL AND KRAIG L. DERSTLER Brett. Carlton E., Liddell, W. David & Derstler, Kraig L. 1983 10 IS: Late Cambrian hard substrate I JETHAIA communities from MontandWyoming: the oldest known hardground encrustcrs. Lethaia, Vol. 16, pp. 281-289. Oslo. ISSN 0024-1164. Hardground surfaces from the Late Cambrian Snowy Range Formation in MontanalWyoming are the oldest known non-reefal hard substrates exhibiting encrusting fossils. These surfaces range in age from Early Franconian to early Trempealeauan. Hardgrounds were developed on slightly hummocky to planar, truncated surfaces of glauconite-rich, carbonate, flat pebble conglomerates, which were deposited during episodes of storm scouring in shallow subtidal environments of the Montana/Wyoming shelf. Snowy Range hardgrounds are encrusted by a low diversity assemblage of fossils dominated by simple discoidal holdfasts of pelmatozoans, probably crinoids, and including small conical spongiomorph algae? and probable stromatolites. Macroborings (e.g. Trypanites) are notably absent from all hardground surfaces, although sharp-walled, vertical, cylindrical holes (borings?) occur in micrite clasts imbedded in certain flat pebble conglomerates. No evidence of faunal succession or microecologic partitioning of irregular surfaces was observed on these Cambrian hardgrounds. 0 Hardgrounds, epibionts, macrobor- ings, pelmatozoan echinoderms, paleoecology, Cambrian, MontanaiWyoming. Cariton E. Brett, Department of Geological Sciences, The University of Rochesrer, Rochester. New York 14627; W. David Liddell, Department of Geology, Utah Stare University, Logan, Utah 84322; Kraig L. Derstler, Department of Geology, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana 70122; 9th September, 1982. Hardgrounds afford a unique opportunity for pa- morph algae? and pelmatozoan echinoderm leoecological studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Exchanges Along the Coastal Margin of the Moray Firth, Eastern Scotland
    Journal ofthe Geological Society, London, Vol. 144, 1987, pp. 179-185, 8 figs., 2 tables. Printed in Northern Ireland Sediment exchanges along the coastal margin of the Moray Firth, Eastern Scotland G. REID' & J. McMANUS Department of Geology, The University, Dundee, Scotland 1 Present address: Department of Oceanography, University College of North Wales, Menai Bridge, Gwynedd LL.59 5EY, UK Abstrart: The Moray Firthis the largest of only three major coastal embayments on the East Coastof Scotland. The relationships between the offshore, coastal margin and fluvial sediments are examined in terms of processes and deposits. These suggest that the large post-glacial accretions of sediment infilling the inner firths are in part attributable to transport of material from the offshore zone. Since the fluvial input to the area appears tobe relatively small and much is retained on estuarine tidal flats it is likely that the offshore contribution is the most important constituent of the deposits of the coastal margin. The other major source is glacial and fluvioglacial material now being reworked by marine activity. Basis of Moray Firth study post-glacial sediments in such areas mayexceed 80 m in Incontrast tothe strongly dissected WestCoast, major thickness. Inthe outer MorayFirth seismicevidence coastal indentations along the East Coast of Scotland are suggests thinner post-and late-glacial accumulations locally limited to the three major embayments of the Forth, the withpatchy distributions resting upona moraine strewn Tay and the largerMoray Firth. Since the rocky stretches of surface (Chesher & Lawson 1983). coastline are sedimentologically relatively inactive,an understanding of the sedimentaryregimes of themajor inlets provides a key to understanding sediment exchanges Hydrographic regime across most of the coast of Eastern Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Chesapeake Bay Cliff Erosion in Calvert County- and to Make Recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners on Issues Relating to Cliff Stabilization
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND BUILDING INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners VIA: Terry Shannon, County Admini VIA: Thomas Barnett, Director / FROM: Dave Brownlee, Principal Environmental Pla ner DATE: May 7, 2014 SUBJECT: Final Report of the Cliff Stabilization Advisory Committee Background: The Cliff Stabilization Advisory Committee was established by the Board of County Commissioners in November 2010. Virginia (Ginger) Haskell, PhD was appointed chairperson. The Committee was charged with responding to the State Steering Committee Report, "Chesapeake Bay Cliff Erosion in Calvert County- and to make recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners on issues relating to cliff stabilization. The Committee is made up of residents representing Chesapeake Bay shoreline communities. Discussion: The Committee held monthly public meetings between January 2011 and June 2013. In an effort to educate the Committee and the community, the Committee invited geologists, biologists, engineers, academics and government officials to give presentations at 9 of their meetings. The Committee's final report (attached) has 17 recommendations and includes the response to the State Steering Committee Report (Appendix E). The Committee continued to meet between June 2013 and April 2014 to complete the report. Dr. Haskell will present the report to the Board of County Commissioners on May 13, 2014 (see attached PowerPoint). A list of the Committee members is given on pages 15-16 of the Final Report and on the last slide of the PowerPoint. Conclusion/Recommendation: Recommend that the BOCC review the Final Report and submit the Final Report to Department Heads to get feedback on implementation of the recommendations within the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Landform Characterization with Geographic Information Systems
    Landform Characterization with Geographic Information Systems Jacek S. BI Abstract landforms therefore often include the way they were formed, The ability to analyze and quantify morphology of the sur- their composition, and the environment in which they were face of the Earth in terms of landform characteristics is es- formed. sential for understanding of the physical, chemical, and The ability to map landforms is an important aspect of biological processes that occur within the landscape. How- any environmental or resource analysis and modeling effort. ever, because of the complexity of taxonomic schema for Traditionally, mapping of the aspects of the environment has landforms which include their provenance, composition, and been accomplished through in situ surveys. The advent of function, these features are difficult to map and quantify us- aerial photography and satellite remote sensing have made ing automated methods. The author suggests geographic in- surveys of large areas easier to accomplish, although this technology still requires in situ verification and ground-tru- formation systems (GIS) based methods for mapping and classification of the landscape suqface into what can be un- thing. While remote sensing technology can provide tremen- derstood as fourth-order-of-relief features and include convex dous amounts of information about the surface of the Earth, it areas and their crests, concave areas and their troughs, open is incapable of providing all of the data needed. The most concavities and enclosed basins, and horizontal and sloping complete approach to mapping the distribution of various en- flats. The features can then be analyzed statistically, aggre- vironmental parameters requires an integrated approach that gated into higher-order-of-relief forms, and correlated with relies on remote sensing and geographically referenced field other aspects of the environment to aid fuller classification survey data, whether in cartographic or tabular format.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of the Beaches in the Regional Park of Salinas and Arenales of San Pedro Del Pinatar (Southeast of Spain) (1899–2019)
    International Journal of Geo-Information Article Evolution of the Beaches in the Regional Park of Salinas and Arenales of San Pedro del Pinatar (Southeast of Spain) (1899–2019) Daniel Ibarra-Marinas, Francisco Belmonte-Serrato, Gustavo A. Ballesteros-Pelegrín * and Ramón García-Marín Department of Geography, Campus La Merced, University of Murcia, 30001 Murcia, Spain; [email protected] (D.I.-M.); [email protected] (F.B.-S.); [email protected] (R.G.-M.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Coastal erosion is anissuewhich affects beaches all over the world and that signifies enormous economic and environmental losses. Classed as a slow phenomenon, the evolution of the coastline requires long-term analysis. In this study, old cartography and aerial photographs from various dates have been used to study the evolution of the coastline. The information has been processed with free software (QGIS) and for the calculation of sediment transport the Coastal Modeling System (SMC) software. The results show the accretion/erosion phenomena that occurred after the construction of the port in San Pedro del Pinatarin 1954 and which changed the coastal dynamics of a highly protected area. In some sectors, the beach has been reduced almost in its Citation: Ibarra-Marinas, D.; entirety, with retreat rates of up to −2.05 m per year and a total area loss of 66,419.81 m2 in Las Belmonte-Serrato, F.; Salinas beach and 76,891.13 m2 on Barraca Quemada beach. Ballesteros-Pelegrín, G.A.; García-Marín, R. Evolution of the Keywords: beach; coastal erosion; coastal construction; sediment transport; Posidoniaoceanica Beaches in the Regional Park of Salinas and Arenales of San Pedro del Pinatar (Southeast of Spain) (1899–2019).
    [Show full text]
  • North Sheppey Erosion Study Volume 1: Coastal
    NORTH SHEPPEY EROSION STUDY VOLUME 1: COASTAL ADAPTATION STUDY Client: Consultant: Swale Borough Council Engineering Services Swale House, Canterbury City Council East Street, Military Road Sittingbourne, Canterbury, ME10 3HT CT1 1YW OCTOBER 2011 Canterbury City Council Engineering Services 0 LIST OF CONTENTS Page VOLUME 1: COASTAL ADAPTATION STUDY Executive Summary 3 1. Background 4 2. Description of site 6 3. Higher level plans 25 4. Historical and Coastal Evolution 31 5. Geology and Morphology 34 6. Aerial photography 36 7. Lidar Airborne laser scanning 37 8. Historic Ordnance Survey Records 39 9. Parameters 40 10. Management of Coastal Erosion Options 50 11. Do Nothing Scenario 62 12. Economic Appraisal 65 13. Environmental Assessment 67 14. Monitoring and Public Warning 69 15. Consultation 71 16. Recommendations and Implementation 72 References 75 List of Photographs Photo 1- The Leas looking west 7 Photo 2- East End of Minster 11 Photo 3- Minster cliffs and sea defences looking west 14 Photo 4- Fly tipping near Royal Oak Point, cliffs highly vegetated. 15 Photo 5- View from Redcot Caravan Park looking across to Lazy Days park 16 Photo 6- Redcot caravan park 16 Photo 7- Looking West from Ashcroft caravan park 17 Photo 8- Barrows Brook 18 Photo 9- Recent mud run at Ashcroft caravan park 19 Photo 10-Warden Point west of Warden Springs 20 Photo 11- Looking east towards Warden Point 20 Photo 12- Rock armour at Warden Bay revetment looking west 23 Photo 13- Rear scarp of recent slide Cliff Drive, Warden Bay 23 Photo 14- Land slide at Warden Point November 1971 43 Photo 15- Cliff warning sign 70 List of Tables 35 Table 1- Geological Details Table 2- Average Future Erosion for England and Wales 41 Table 3- Historic and predicted future erosion rates 42 Table 4- Recorded land slide history 44 Table 5- Relative sea level rise from UKCP09 47 Table 6- Recommended contingency allowances for net sea level rise PPS25 48 Table 7- Property adaptation, financial options 61 Table 8- Summary of impacts resulting from a do nothing scenario.
    [Show full text]
  • GEO “Oceans and Society: Blue Planet” Initiative 2020
    GEO “Oceans and Society: Blue Planet” Initiative 2020 – 2022 Implementation Plan GEO Blue Planet Implementation Plan Version 2.0 – March 2019 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 2. Purpose and Activities ................................................................................................................ 2 Cross-cutting Activities ............................................................................................................... 4 Stakeholder Engagement and Societal Awareness Working Group ....................................... 4 Capacity Development Working Group .................................................................................. 7 Data Discovery, Access and Utilization Working Group........................................................ 7 Thematic Activities ..................................................................................................................... 9 Understanding Flooding on Reef-lined Island Coasts Working Group .................................. 9 Multi-hazard Information and Alert System for the Wider Caribbean Project ..................... 10 Water-related diseases Working Group ................................................................................. 11 Marine Debris Working Group.............................................................................................. 11 3. Background and Previous Achievements ................................................................................
    [Show full text]