How Civil Society Organisations Changed the Regulation of Clinical Trials in India

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How Civil Society Organisations Changed the Regulation of Clinical Trials in India Edinburgh Research Explorer How civil society organisations changed regulation of clinical trials in India Citation for published version: Sariola, S, Jeffery, R, Jesani, A & Porter, G 2019, 'How civil society organisations changed regulation of clinical trials in India', Science as Culture, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 200-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2018.1493449 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1080/09505431.2018.1493449 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Science as Culture Publisher Rights Statement: © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 30. Sep. 2021 Science as Culture ISSN: 0950-5431 (Print) 1470-1189 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/csac20 How Civil Society Organisations Changed the Regulation of Clinical Trials in India Salla Sariola, Roger Jeffery, Amar Jesani & Gerard Porter To cite this article: Salla Sariola, Roger Jeffery, Amar Jesani & Gerard Porter (2018): How Civil Society Organisations Changed the Regulation of Clinical Trials in India, Science as Culture, DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2018.1493449 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2018.1493449 © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 13 Jul 2018. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 9 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=csac20 SCIENCE AS CULTURE https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2018.1493449 How Civil Society Organisations Changed the Regulation of Clinical Trials in India Salla Sariolaa,b, Roger Jefferyc, Amar Jesanid and Gerard Portere aEthox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; bSociology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; cSchool of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; dIndependent Researcher and Teacher (Bioethics, Public Health); eSchool of Law, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK ABSTRACT KEYWORDS In 2005 India changed its pharmaceutical and innovation India; regulation; civil society policy that facilitated a dramatic increase in international organisations; clinical trials; clinical trials involving study sites in India. This policy shift bioethics; social justice was surrounded by controversies; civil society organisations (CSOs) criticised the Indian government for promoting the commercialisation of pharmaceutical research and development. Health social movements in India fought for social justice through collective action, and engaged in normative reasoning of the benefits, burdens and equality of research. They lobbied to protect trial participants from structural violence that occurred especially in the first 5–6 years of the new policy. CSOs played a major role in the introduction of new regulations in 2013, which accelerated a decline in the number of global trials carried out in India. This activism applied interpretations of global social justice as key ideas in mobilisation, eventually helping to institutionalise stricter ethical regulation on a national level. Like government and industry, activists believed in randomised controlled trials and comparison as key methods for scientific knowledge production. However, they had significant concerns about the global hierarchies of commercial pharmaceutical research, and their impact on the rights of participants and on benefits for India overall. Pointing to ethical malpractices and lobbying for stricter ethical regulations, they aimed to ensure justice for research participants, and developed effective strategies to increase controls over the business side of clinical research. Introduction As part of the world-wide offshoring or globalisation of clinical trials that dates from the 1990s, there has been a dramatic expansion of global clinical trials and CONTACT Salla Sariola salla.sariola@utu.fi Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, Uni- versity of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK; Sociology, University of Turku, Assistentinkatu 7, 20014Turku, Finland © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 2 S. SARIOLA ET AL. international contract research organisations (CROs) in India. The number of trials with Indian sites grew especially after 2005. That year, following the signing of the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) in 1995, India brought its domestic patent laws into line with WTO requirements. This allowed foreign sponsors to test new drugs in India without fear of copying. In 2005, India revised its pharmaceutical legislation to match the international ICH Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Guidelines – which standardises the conduct of randomised control trials (RCTs) globally and was drawn up by the pharmaceutical industry (Abraham, 2010; Cooper and Waldby, 2014) – to enable global phase II and III clinical trials to take place within the country. Removing restrictions on global trials was part of a national programme designed to attract trials and encourage Indian pharmaceuticals companies to shift their Research and Development (R&D) from being almost entirely based on ‘reverse-engineering’ of existing molecules to carrying out innovative research on new molecules. Supporters of clinical trials described benefits for India in terms of foreign exchange earnings and Indian involvement in advanced scientific activities. Those promoting India as a trial destination also made bold and, in the event, exaggerated claims about the likely scale of trial activity in India. The market research firm Frost and Sullivan (2012), for example, estimated that Indian clinical trials business was worth USD $485 million (£282 million) in 2010–2011 and would pass the $1 billion (£594 million) mark by 2016. Local and international promoters within the pharmaceutical sector stressed lower expenses for sponsors because of: low Indian salaries; the existence of a large pool of potential trial participants; and the availability of English-speaking staff. Carrying out trials could also offer sponsoring companies an opportunity to build market access by establishing networks of friendly key physicians. Opti- mistic estimates of the current and future size of the industry helped it to lever- age assistance from the Government of India: direct funding, its support for schemes involving collaboration between industry and academia, sharing state institutions’ infrastructures, and through deregulation itself, for example (Kale and Little, 2007, pp. 605–606). The changes brought into play a plethora of new actors in the field of clinical research. Kaushik Sunder Rajan has described India’s emergent CROs, inter- national sponsors, clinical hospital sites etc. as a form of capacity building through which India joined the global pharmaceutical industry (Sunder Rajan, 2010). Sariola et al. (2015) call this process ‘Big-Pharmaceuticalisation,’ pointing to how the pharmaceutical industry is impacting on how, where and on whom drugs are tested, and changing local industries towards global collaborative and methodological models. Civil society groups and voices within mass media contested the economic policy leading to the increase of international clinical trials in India from the start. As the number of global trials increased in India (see Table 1), such SCIENCEASCULTURE 3 Table 1. Approvals of trials by CDSCO between 2007 and 2017. Note: All values taken from the running number of the trials approved for that year. Source: All sources from the CDSCO website for approved clinical trials, accessed 15 September 2016. 2007–2012: http://www.cdsco.nic.in/writereaddata/DCG(I)%20approved%20clinical%20trial%20registered%20in% 20ctri%20website%20(Jan.2013).pdf 2013: http://www.cdsco.nic.in/Forms/list.aspx?lid = 1884 2014: http://www.cdsco.nic.in/Forms/list.aspx?lid = 1883 2015: http://www.cdsco.nic.in/forms/list.aspx?lid = 2093andId = 11 2016 and 2017: http://www.cdsco.nic.in/forms/list.aspx?lid = 2173&Id = 11 Note on the Source: In 2010, the number of approvals by the CDSCO dropped before regulatory restrictions came into force, which
Recommended publications
  • Exploratory Study on Clinical Trials Conducted by Swiss Pharmaceutical Companies in India: Issues, Concerns and Challenges
    Exploratory Study on Clinical Trials Conducted by Swiss Pharmaceutical Companies in India: Issues, Concerns and Challenges Sama is a Delhi-based non governmental organisation working on issues of women's health and rights. Sama seeks to locate the concerns of women's health in the context of socio-historical, economic and political realities, and find linkages between women's well-being and livelihoods, food, violence and other larger issues that affect their lives. Sama's core work areas include issues related to Public Health, Reproductive and Medical Technologies, Ethics and Regulations of Clinical Trials and Violence Against Women. Sama engages with a range of organisations, health networks, people's health movement, policy makers and academia through strategies of policy monitoring and advocacy, capacity building, research, knowledge creation and dissemination. Founded in 1968, the Berne Declaration (BD) is an independent Swiss non-governmental organisation formed to combat the root causes of poverty by promoting more equitable and sustainable relations between Switzerland and the developing world. As a not- for-profit organisation with 23 500 members, the BD is committed to global justice and addresses issues of trade policy, commodity production and trade, the politics of food, finance, fair trade and health. As part of a worldwide network of human rights groups, environmental and development organisations, the BD promotes a more equitable and humane route to global development. To this end, the BD carries out investigative research,
    [Show full text]
  • 07001 Prelim Prog for Print.Qxp
    The information in this preliminary program will be updated periodically – this file is current as of June 1, 2007. For the most up-to-date content, click here. June 17-21, 2007|Atlanta, Georgia Don’t miss the Attend presentations event of the and case studies from more than year for the 1,000 speakers pharmaceutical and related Hear representatives from the FDA, EMEA industries! and other global regulatory agencies 27 tracks offered over 3½ days 35+ preconference tutorials Over 450 exhibitors Exhibit space is still available! 43rd Annual Meeting Georgia PROGRAM CHAIRPERSON World Congress Alberto Grignolo, PhD Center PAREXEL Consulting Program Chairperson umber 43 is finally here! And so are we all, ready to immerse ourselves fully into the Nenergy and substance of the 43rd Annual Meeting of DIA. Forty-three years after the 1st DIA Annual Meeting, the world is rather different – including Alberto Grignolo, PhD, is Corpor- that particular, specialized pharmaceutical world that DIA has mirrored and influenced for ate Vice President and General more than four decades. Through the yearly gathering of thousands of its members, DIA’s Manager of the Drug Development Annual Meeting has chronicled events of profound impact to the development of medicines; Consulting Practice in PAREXEL has offered a forum to innovators, critics, thought leaders, regulators and students of our Consulting. For the past fourteen field; has attracted an ever-expanding multinational constituency like a powerful magnet and years he has been responsible for has nurtured both learning and debate; has evolved into the must-attend event of the year PAREXEL’s regulatory services, for so many in our particular world.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
    e-ISSN: 2320-1215 p-ISSN: 2322-0112 RESEARCH AND REVIEWS: JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES An Overview of Regulatory Process for Pharmaceutical Sector in India. Suresh S*, SB Puranik, and Phatru Patel. Drishti Institute of Distance Learning, Bangalore -560004, Karnataka, India. Review Article Received: 15/07/2014 ABSTRACT Revised: 18/08/2014 Accepted: 22/08/2014 India is about one-third the size of the USA in terms of area. India is a pool of diverse population base of more than 1.2 billion *For Correspondence and is a home for a numerous diseases, Institutions and hub of contract manufacturers and researchers. Indian economy stand as the third largest based on the Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) and in Drishti Institute of Distance terms of globally eleventh largest by nominal Gross Domestic Learning, Bangalore - Product (GDP). India is today one of the top emerging markets in the 560004, Karnataka, India. global pharmaceutical scene. The sector is highly knowledge based Mobile: +91 9845473725 and its steady growth is positively affecting the Indian economy. The organised nature of the Indian pharmaceutical industry is attracting Keywords: CDSCO, Ministry of several companies that are finding it viable to increase their Health, DCGI, Subject Expert operations in the country. Further, India is home to about 10,500 Committee, Regulatory manufacturing units and over 3,000 pharma companies. India process. exports all forms of pharmaceuticals from APIs to formulations, both in modern medicine and traditional Indian medicines. This article provides a perspective on the Indian pharmaceuticals regulatory process from pre-independence era to till date.
    [Show full text]
  • (CDSCO). the Secretary Made a Brief Presentation About the Working of the CDSCO
    PARLIAMENT OF INDIA RAJYA SABHA 59 DEPARTMENT-RELATED PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE FIFTY-NINTH REPORT ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE CENTRAL DRUGS STANDARD CONTROL ORGANISATION (CDSCO) (PRESENTED TO THE RAJYA SABHA ON 8TH MAY, 2012) (LAID ON THE TABLE OF THE LOK SABHA ON 8TH MAY, 2012) RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI MAY, 2012/VAISHAKHA, 1934 (SAKA) Website : http://rajyasabha.nic.in E-mail : [email protected] PARLIAMENT OF INDIA RAJYA SABHA DEPARTMENT-RELATED PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE FIFTY-NINTH REPORT ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE CENTRAL DRUGS STANDARD CONTROL ORGANISATION (CDSCO) (PRESENTED TO THE RAJYA SABHA ON 8TH MAY, 2012) (LAID ON THE TABLE OF THE LOK SABHA ON 8TH MAY, 2012) RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI APRIL, 2012/VAISHAKHA, 1934 (SAKA) CONTENTS PAGES 1. COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE ......................................................................................... (i)-(ii) (i) Main Committee .......................................................................................................... (i) (ii) Sub-Committee – III on Draft Reports ................................................................... (ii) 2. PREFACE ............................................................................................................................ (iii) 3. REPORT .................................................................................................................................. 1—32 4. STUDY NOTE ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prospective Registration of Clinical Trials in India: Strategies, Achievements & Challenges Prathap Tharyan
    Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine ISSN 1756-5391 Prospective Registration of Clinical Trials in India: Strategies, Achievements & Challenges Prathap Tharyan South Asian Cochrane Network & Centre, Vellore 632002, India Keywords Abstract Clinical trials; research design; legislation; publication bias; Institutional Review Board Objective This paper traces the development of the Clinical Trial Registry-India (CTRI) against the backdrop of the inequities in healthcare and the limitations in Correspondence the design, conduct, regulation, oversight and reporting of clinical trials in India. Prathap Tharyan MD, MRCPsych, It describes the scope and goals of the CTRI, the data elements it seeks and the Professor of Psychiatry Director, South Asian Cochrane Network process of registering clinical trials. It reports progress in trial registration in India & Centre and discusses the challenges in ensuring that healthcare decisions are informed by Prof. BV Moses & Indian Council of Medical all the evidence. Research Advanced Centre for Research Methods A descriptive survey of developments in clinical trial registration in & Training in Evidence Informed Health Care India from publications in the Indian medical literature supplemented by firsthand Christian Medical College knowledge of these developments and an evaluation of how well clinical trials Vellore 632002 Tamil Nadu India. registered in the CTRI up to 10 January, 2009 comply with the requirements of Tel: + 91 416 2284499 Fax: +91 416 2260085 the CTRI and the World Health Organization’s International Clinical Trial Registry Email: [email protected] (WHO ICTRP). Results Considerable inequities exist within the Indian health system. Deficien- cies in healthcare provision and uneven regulation of, and access to, affordable Received 21 January 2009; accepted for healthcare co-exists with a large private health system of uneven quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconsidering India As a Clinical Trial Location
    Reconsidering India as a Clinical Trial Location Revised Regulations Warrant a Fresh Look COUNTRY PROFILE As recently as 2010, international life sciences companies recognized India India as an attractive location for conducting clinical trials. The country is the world’s most populous democracy, and the large patient • Population population is not only diverse, but also accessible in urban centers, Approximately 1.271 billion, often treatment naïve, and very willing to participate in trials. concentrated in urban centers; most populous democracy in the world However, as start-up timelines became more and more protracted • Disease Profile and as data quality often fell under suspicion, sponsors’ interest in Prevalence of acute and chronic India dropped off quite dramatically. In 2010 the number of clinical trial diseases; rise of lifestyle disorders application approvals reached 500, and that, as it turned out, was a highpoint. The number dropped to 150 in 2014, and to 81 by mid- • Languages 22, 9 of which are commonly December in 2015. spoken; Hindi is the official Indeed, perceptions persist among sponsors that locating trials in language; English is the business language India is problematic. In an informal poll of global R&D companies at the start of a webinar on the subject presented by Pharm-Olam, nearly • Literacy half (49 percent) of attendees indicated that the country’s regulatory Approximately 74-75% environment was their greatest concern. Another 18 percent pointed • Land Area to start-up timelines, 15 percent to data quality, and 15 percent to 1.2 million square miles, the third ethical concerns. largest country in Asia In order to rekindle interest in India as a trial location, the Indian • Political Structure Democracy; the central government regulatory authorities have, over the past two years, made a concerted is divided into three branches effort to overhaul the study approval process and to rewrite the (Executive, Parliament, and Judiciary) policies governing how trials are conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Trial in India-An Overview
    CLINICAL TRIAL IN INDIA-AN OVERVIEW Debjit Bhowmik*,Chiranjib.B Rajiv Gandhi college of Pharmacy Nautanwa, Maharajganj,Uttar Pradesh [email protected] ABSTRACT Global Pharmaceutical companies based in developed countries are increasingly turning to developing countries and emerging economies around the world for conducting clinical trials. Reduced costs combined with easy availability of patients with varied diseases makes developing countries favourite destinations for clinical research outsourcing. Drug trials, commonly known as clinical trials, are scientific tests made on human volunteers. Such trials are carried out in 3phases. In the first phase, studies are carried out on volunteers to determine the safety of the drug. In the second phase, on persons having the disease or medical condition to determine whether the drug has some level of therapeutic effect. In the last phase, trials are long-term studies on patients to determine whether the drug will be truly effective in normal medical settings. India, a country with the largest pool of patients suffering from cancer, diabetes and other maladies, has become the global hub for carrying out clinical trials at random. Almost all the top pharmaceutical companies of the world have set up clinical trial facilities in major cities, like Ahmedabad, Hyderabad, etc.A large native patient population pool, various disease profiles and robust infrastructure position India high on the outsourcing list. Today, 122 clinical trials are being conducted in India. GlaxoSmithKline, among the world's top ten global pharma majors, is currently carrying out the largest number of clinical trials in India. Apart from the development of vaccines, the UK-based pharma major is conducting 13 drug trials in India for the treatment of diseases such as cancer, arthritis, epilepsy, heart disease and constipation.
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Trends of Scope and Opportunities Clinical Trials in India
    International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Vol 2, Suppl 1, 2010 Review Article EMERGING TRENDS OF SCOPE AND OPPORTUNITIES CLINICAL TRIALS IN INDIA DEBJIT BHOWMIK*, MARGRET CHANDIRA, CHIRANJIB.B RAJIV GANDHI COLLEGE OF PHARMACY, NAUTANWA MAHARAJGANJ, UTTAR PRADESH Email­[email protected] ABSTRACT India has emerged as one of the preferred destinations for the clinical trials of drugs by multinational pharmaceutical companies in recent years. The reasons for this include reasonably high standards of quality healthcare and healthcare professionals, use of the English language and the sheer size of target populations available in our country. Clinical trials are usually multi‐centric but trials in North America and Europe turn out to be time consuming and expensive. While clinical trials in the west are not totally free from compromised interest, mishaps and litigation, the medical research organizations (MRO) are licensed and highly regulated and people are sufficiently aware of the possible risks of such trials and also aware of their rights to healthcare. In India, the scenario is very different. A non‐uniform healthcare system, with varying standards in the government and private sectors, desperate poverty and lack of access to healthcare, illiteracy, lack of information and poor enforcement constitute a chaotic milieu which is a major challenge for a programme as critical as a clinical trial. INTRODUCTION But, according to pharma company officials, this fear is unwarranted as the Indian Government is soon India is emerging as a major centre for clinical trials in expected to come out with laws governing clinical new products by multinational pharmaceutical trials. Some guidelines are already in place.
    [Show full text]
  • The Struggle of Regulating Clinical Trials in a Developing Nation
    Seton Hall University eRepository @ Seton Hall Law School Student Scholarship Seton Hall Law 2015 The trS uggle of Regulating Clinical Trials in a Developing Nation: India’s Experience Arianna Moure Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Moure, Arianna, "The trS uggle of Regulating Clinical Trials in a Developing Nation: India’s Experience" (2015). Law School Student Scholarship. 774. https://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship/774 Medical research is important to both human health and scientific advancement. Human subject research is necessary to assure that medicines are both safe and effective for the general public. Research on human beings is not something American citizens are unfamiliar with. However, unlike developing nations, many laws and regulations protect United States citizens who decide to volunteer for clinical trials. Although some developing nations, such as India, have made some progress by providing human rights protections for clinical trial participants, most of the legislation has been reactionary and ambiguous. In practice, the proposed bills leave vast amounts of discretion to the regulatory bodies in India. This paper will begin with an overview of the legal framework which clinical trials must be conducted within in the United States, followed by an introduction to the barriers researchers face in obtaining truly informed consent from populations in developing nations due to challenges with literacy, culture and lack of access to health care. After a general introduction to these difficulties, we will explore the Indian experience. India will serve as the example of how research in developing nations is affected by regulatory guidelines and how research is impacted by local differences.
    [Show full text]
  • Capacity Building for Clinical Trials in India
    2 Indian J Med Res 124, December 2006, pp 605-607 Editorial Capacity building for clinical trials in India Recent events worldwide have challenged the of biotechnology in general and genomics and integrity of research on pharmaceutical products and proteomics in particular. have triggered calls by legislators, medical associations, the International Committee of Medical While Good Clinical Practices (GCPs) have been Journal Editors (ICMJE), the World Health clearly spelt out and ethical guidelines have been Organization (WHO) and others, for increased articulated, our experience with implementation is accountability and transparency in health products relatively short. The regulatory system is already research and development. India, which is projected stretched in terms of its ability to monitor proper to have accelerated growth in this sector with the implementation. The expected fast growth in the entry of a number of major global and domestic industry is going to further stretch the capabilities players and a more research focused pharmaceutical of the system and highlight complexities and industry, is poised to face formidable challenges. unintended consequences. Building the right kind of capacity to meet the To address these issues, an interactive workshop anticipated demand for clinical trials in India is an on “Building and Managing Clinical Trial Capacity important issue. Along with the optimism for growth in India : Challenges in Ethics, Equity and Efficiency” in this industry is the concern that vulnerable was held in Hyderabad in October 2005 by the Indian populations may be exploited. Access to Council of Medical Research (ICMR), in collaboration experimental drugs, exposure to latest therapies, with Administrative Staff College of India (ASCI), improvement in equipment and infrastructure, and Hyderabad, and Fordham University of New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Pediatric Clinical Trials Department of Pediatrics, TN Medical College and BYL Nair Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
    [Downloaded free from http://www.picronline.org on Friday, September 06, 2013, IP: 140.234.255.9] || Click here to download free Android application for this journal Review Article Sandeep B. Bavdekar Pediatric clinical trials Department of Pediatrics, TN Medical College and BYL Nair Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India Address for correspondence: Dr. Sandeep B. Bavdekar, Department of Pediatrics, TN Medical College and BYL Nair Hospital, Mumbai ‑ 400 008, Maharashtra, India. E‑mail: [email protected] HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE prepared a set of guidelines to help investigators conduct ethically sound research. It allowed both therapeutic and Although, descriptions of childhood illnesses is found in non‑therapeutic research involving children, provided ancient Egyptian, Greek and Roman texts; there is hardly consent was obtained from the child’s parent or guardian.[1,3] any documentation of medical research in children prior to the 18th century. Edward Jenner’s smallpox vaccination It is worth remembering that with other vulnerable sections experiment is, probably, the first documented study in the of the society, children bore the brunt of ill‑effects of pediatric population. Later, in the 19th century, when pediatric human experimentation. Use of thalidomide by pregnant medicine became a recognized specialty, children in pediatric women resulted in severe birth defects. Institutionalized hospitals and orphanages became a ready source of for children in the Willowbrook State School were deliberately experimentation in children. The use of this highly vulnerable infected with hepatitis virus as a means of studying the section for research studies hardly caused any flutter; given potential to develop a vaccine.[1,4] The continuation of the prevalent norms regarding biomedical research.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Trial Participation: Attitudes of Indian Schizophrenic Patients with Depressive Symptoms
    South American Journal of Clinical Research, Volume-2, Issue-1, 2015 CLINICAL TRIAL PARTICIPATION: ATTITUDES OF INDIAN SCHIZOPHRENIC PATIENTS WITH DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS Original Article by Melisa Pereira1*, Nilesh Shah2, Avinash Desousa2, India (M.Sc., Ph.D., in Clinical Research Student of Texila American University1*) (Department of Psychiatry, Lokmanya Tilak Medical College and Sion Hospital, Mumbai2) Email: - [email protected] ABSTRACT BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES In clinical trials, the informed consent process intends to provide information to the individuals about the risks, rights, and benefits of participation. However, obtaining informed consent from subjects with diminished mental abilities and impaired capacity to consent has been a challenge for many researchers. In addition, little is known about the willingness of Indian schizophrenic patients with depressive symptoms to participate in psychiatry research. The present study was designed to understand the attitudes of Indian schizophrenic patients with depressive symptoms regarding clinical trial participation. METHODS This interview-based study was conducted on fifty patients aged 18–65 years who met the DSM- IV diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia, and who had depressive symptoms as defined by a score of ≥ 7 on the Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The patients were asked to pretend that they were potential candidates for a hypothetical trial involving an antipsychotic drug, and were given the following three questions to express their attitudes towards clinical trial participation: 1). Is there a need for clinical trials in India? 2) As a study subject you will receive monetary reimbursement per visit. Do you feel you should be reimbursed? Why? 3) What is your level of convenience with respect to travel/stay at the hospital for clinical trial procedures? All of the fifty patients completed the interview-based study.
    [Show full text]