Scanned by Scan2net

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scanned by Scan2net European University Institute Department of Law The Romani claim to non-territorial nationhood: taking legitimacy-based claims seriously in international law Morag Goodwin Supervisor: Prof Neil Walker ; Iï t Thesis submitted with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of Laws of the European University Institute 1 \ Florence, April 2006 European University Institute 3 0001 0047 7218 4 0 8 MAG. 2006 BIBLIOTECA European University Institute 2 **) Department of Law The Romani claim to non-territorial nationhood: taking legitimacy-based claims seriously in international law Morag Goodwin Examining Board Members: Prof. Neil Walker (Supervisor, European University Institute) Prof. Michael Keating (European University Institute) Prof. James TuIIy (University of Victoria) Mr. Stephen Tierney (University of Edinburgh) Florence, April 2006 Acknowledgements The first and most important words of gratitude are owed to my parents, to whom this work is dedicated. My brother and I were brought up to believe that we could achieve anything and that education was the key to giving us choices in life. I’m not sure if they would have wished me to pursue my education so far, or if they are thrilled with the decisions I have made, but I know that they are proud, that I am loved, and that they are content with my choices as long as I am. One could not ask for more from parents. It is dedicated too to my brother, Ian, for his faith in my ability and for his unfailing talent for making me laugh out loud. Both have been powerful sustaining forces throughout the process and through the difficult moments in the last few years. I hope that he is suitably impressed with the result and can find no hint of drowning highwaymen here! I owe a great deal of thanks to my supervisor, Neil Walker, who has guided me, imperceptibly almost, to the final thesis. He has provided encouragement and support whilst refraining from imposing his own thoughts and ideas upon my work. Allowing a free rein to one’s supervisees in pursuit of their research is not perhaps the easiest path to a Ph.D. for either party, but it is the more interesting and rewarding one, and I am grateful that this is the path I was ushered down. I am grateful too to Benedict Kingsbury and to Kirsty Gover for the discussions we shared at NYU in the autumn of 2003. It was a brief but immensely valuable period. My interest in the Roma stems from my time as an intern, and later as a researcher, working at the European Roma Rights Center in Budapest. I owe much to those who tutored me on Romani issues during my time there, Claude Cahn in particular. Ilona Klimova-Alexander and Peter Vermeersch kindly sent me their unpublished Ph.D. manuscripts upon request; their work features prominently in the first three chapters and I am grateful for their generosity in sharing their work with me. Among the friends without whom my time at the Institute would have been much the poorer - especially Jochen, Claire, Neil, Peer, Monica, and Bernhard - I owe particular thanks to two. This work owes a special debt to Euan MacDonald. Without 1 his friendship and support, particularly in the early stages, I doubt that it would have seen completion. His critical input has improved all major aspects of it and I cannot think that I will ever be so lucky with an office-mate again. Similarly, an extra word of thanks is owed to Nils Coleman; his friendship provided a welcome relief from all matters of work, but also ensured that my growth was not limited to matters of academia. I owe thanks, too, to Thomas. He has helped to ensure that my ideas stayed grounded and did not result in oh so much wishful thinking. Where I have succeeded in preventing heady idealism from taking over, it is due largely to his efforts. He has helped me to structure my thoughts and the resulting work, listening as my thinking, particularly on recognition, swirled beyond my control. That it is pinned down at all owes much to his support and impatience. I am grateful too to the Institute itself and to the Law Department in particular. Like any institution, it has its quirks and oddities, but it is a special place and I feel privileged to have been a part of it. Within its beautiful walls, I have grown intellectually beyond my own recognition. It is difficult to say whether this is a good thing or not: life seemed much simpler before. Thanks is also due to my current institute - the Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, to METRO and to the International and European Law Department in particular - both for support in allowing me research time to finish the thesis and for the faith of hiring someone as an UD on the basis of a promised PhD. My apologies that it took longer than anticipated. My parents have patiently proof-read every chapter, attempting to create clear and simple sentences from my long-winded prose. Where they have succeeded in producing clarity, the credit is theirs. mmmmmmmwm m i m m m m m m i imniJPpiiw iiw w pw iiw w Table of Contents Acknowledgements................................................................................. 1 Table of Contents.......................................................................................................... 3 Introduction............................................................................... ; .................................. 6 1. Subject and delimitation of this thesis..................................................................7 2. Structure of this thesis...........................................................................................9 Section 1....................................................................... 14 Chapter 1 : A History of the Roma ......................................... ....................................15 1.1. Indian Origins...................................................................................................15 1.2. A people of Europe.......................................................................................... 21 1.2.1. From pilgrims to persecution....................................................................21 1.2.2. The Romani Holocaust (O (Baro) Porrajmos)..........................................27 1.2.3. Post- war responses to the ‘Gypsy problem’ ............................................28 1.2.4. A global people .............................................................. 32 Chapter 2: Romani Transnational Political Organisation ........................................... 35 2.1. The past of Romani political mobilisation......................................................36 2.2. An analysis of recent Romani claims...............................................................46 2.2.1. Conceptions of the Romani Nation...........................................................46 2.2.2. The European Roma Forum and alternative national claims .................... 49 2.2.3. A Non-territorial Nation ..... .............................................................. 55 2.2.4. Summary................................................................................................... 60 Chapter 3: On Romani Identity....................................................................................65 3.1 Conceiving of Romani identity......................................................................... 65 3.1.1. A Diasporic Identity? ......................... 66 3.1.2. Identity as Lifestyle....................................................................................73 3.1.3. Blood-brothers ................................................................................ 75 3.2. The Romani archipelago...................................................................................78 3.3. A Pan-Romani identity?....................................................................................85 3.3.1. Ingroup/ Outgroup Distinctions ................................................................ 85 3.3.2. Post-colonial Identity.................................................................................86 3.3.3. Romanipé as a source of pan-Romani identity.........................................89 3.4. The Romani Movement as Identity- Building: a short riposte .................... 96 Section 2................................... 99 Chapter 4: Recognition: Theories and Practice.........................................................100 4.1. Recognition and the Situating of the Self....................................................101 4.1.1. The Hegelian Dialectic and the Path to Freedom ...................................102 4.1.2. The Social Self, Identity and the story that we tell ourselves ................. 106 4.1.3 Charles Taylor’s authenticity in horizons of significance ....................... I ll 4.1.4. Misrecognition or Why Recognition Matters..........................................114 3 !* W thfiiM Ulliittitlaiihtituîtiii t». * i* ii j ; ; I • ^ ~ fl>Tt rrrtfr**— ^ ^WiWliW 4.2 Recognition and the Political............................................................................121 4.2.1. A Liberal Response...................................................................................121 A. Special status rights.................................................................. ......................122 B. Habermas and constitutional patriotism.........................................................125 4.2.2. The Politics of Difference: a Communitarian approach ..........................129 4.2.3. Recognition and Agonism: politics as a critical activity ..........................131
Recommended publications
  • VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • 2018 Aims and Scope
    VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • 2018 Aims and Scope Critical Romani Studies is an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, providing a forum for activist-scholars to critically examine racial oppressions, different forms of exclusion, inequalities, and human rights abuses Editors of Roma. Without compromising academic standards of evidence collection and analysis, the Journal seeks to create a platform to critically engage with Maria Bogdan academic knowledge production, and generate critical academic and policy Central European University knowledge targeting – amongst others – scholars, activists, and policy-makers. Jekatyerina Dunajeva Pázmány Péter Catholic University Scholarly expertise is a tool, rather than the end, for critical analysis of social phenomena affecting Roma, contributing to the fight for social justice. The Journal Tímea Junghaus especially welcomes the cross-fertilization of Romani studies with the fields of European Roma Institute for Arts and Culture critical race studies, gender and sexuality studies, critical policy studies, diaspora studies, colonial studies, postcolonial studies, and studies of decolonization. Angéla Kóczé Central European University The Journal actively solicits papers from critically-minded young Romani Iulius Rostas (editor-in-chief) scholars who have historically experienced significant barriers in engaging Central European University with academic knowledge production. The Journal considers only previously unpublished manuscripts which present original, high-quality research. The Márton Rövid (managing editor) Journal is committed to the principle of open access, so articles are available free Central European University of charge. All published articles undergo rigorous peer review, based on initial Marek Szilvasi (review editor) editorial screening and refereeing by at least two anonymous scholars. The Journal Open Society Foundations provides a modest but fair remuneration for authors, editors, and reviewers.
    [Show full text]
  • Gypsy Punk: Towards a New Immigrant Music
    ORBIT-OnlineRepository ofBirkbeckInstitutionalTheses Enabling Open Access to Birkbeck’s Research Degree output Gypsy Punk: Towards a New Immigrant Music https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/40029/ Version: Public Version Citation: Ashton-Smith, Alan (2013) Gypsy Punk: Towards a New Immi- grant Music. [Thesis] (Unpublished) c 2020 The Author(s) All material available through ORBIT is protected by intellectual property law, including copy- right law. Any use made of the contents should comply with the relevant law. Deposit Guide Contact: email Gypsy Punk: Towards a New Immigrant Music ALAN ASHTON-SMITH THE LONDON CONSORTIUM BIRKBECK, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2012 1 Declaration I certify that this thesis is the result of my own investigations and, except for quotations, all of which have been clearly identified, was written entirely by me. Alan Ashton-Smith July 2012 Acknowledgements It is unlikely that I could have written this thesis anywhere except in the unique environment of the London Consortium, and I am grateful for the opportunity to be part of its PhD programme, and for the unwavering and wide-ranging interest and advice of its staff and students. I have had excellent supervision throughout the research and writing process. Many thanks are due to Steven Connor for his enthusiasm for the project and his polymathic advice, and to Ioana Szeman for her valuable expertise and ability to tease out threads of argument from tangled text. I am fortunate that the primary subjects of my research – the members of Gogol Bordello – allow themselves to be so accessible, and thank them for being happy to talk about their work, for sharing their riders, and for throwing magnificent afterparties.
    [Show full text]
  • Discourses About the Gypsy / Roma in Europe Since 1989 A
    Talking Difference: Discourses about the Gypsy / Roma in Europe since 1989 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Adina Alexandra Giurgiu Schneeweis IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Adviser: Catherine R. Squires August 2009 © Adina Schneeweis 2009 Acknowledgements All blessings are divine in origin but none can be compared with this power of intellectual investigation and research which is an eternal gift producing fruits of unending delight. ’Abdu’l-Bahá I have been going to school for twenty-two years – a time blessed with unending delight, indeed. In this process, I cannot count the people that have helped me and shaped me. Suffice to say that I am grateful for the opportunities I have been offered, from family members, mentors, teachers, friends, and staff that have taken the time to know me and share a smile with me every day. The University of Minnesota and especially the School of Journalism and Mass Communication have been so generous in their support. My academic life has been marked by several mentors to whom I am forever indebted. For supporting my beliefs and pushing them forward, I thank my advisor, Dr. Catherine Squires. Stepping into this process at a key point, Catherine, you have taught me how to be my own critical reader. More importantly, our conversations have encouraged me to keep going and have confirmed that this matters! Dr. Brian Southwell has served as my advisor for many months and his encouragement and guidance I must acknowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Romani Communities and Transformative Change: a New Social Europe
    POLICY PRESSPOLICY & PRACT ICE ROMANI COMMUNITIES AND TRANSFORMATIVE CHANGE A New Social Europe EDITED BY ANDREW RYDER, MARIUS TABA AND NIDHI TREHAN EDITED BY ANDREW RYDER, MARIUS TABA AND NIDHI TREHAN ROMANI COMMUNITIES AND TRANSFORMATIVE CHANGE A New Social Europe POLICY PRESSPOLICY & PRACT ICE First published in Great Britain in 2021 by Policy Press, an imprint of Bristol University Press University of Bristol 1– 9 Old Park Hill Bristol BS2 8BB UK t: +44 (0)117 954 5940 e: bup- [email protected] Details of international sales and distribution partners are available at policy.bristoluniversitypress.co.uk © Bristol University Press 2021 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978- 1- 4473- 5750- 6 paperback ISBN 978- 1- 4473- 5751- 3 ePub ISBN 978- 1- 4473- 5752- 0 OA ePdf The digital PDF version of this title is available Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0) which permits reproduction and distribution for non-commercial use without further permission provided the original work is attributed. The right of Andrew Ryder, Marius Taba and Nidhi Trehan to be identified as editors of this work has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved: no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of Bristol University Press.
    [Show full text]