Generation and Characterization of Spred-2 Knockout Mice

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Generation and Characterization of Spred-2 Knockout Mice Generation and Characterization of Spred-2 Knockout Mice Dissertation zur Erlangung des naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorgrades der Bayerischen Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg vorgelegt von Dr. med. Karin Andrea Bundschu (geb. Geis) aus Frankfurt/Main Würzburg 2005 Eingereicht am: .....…………………………………………………………….. Mitglieder der Promotionskommission: Vorsitzender: ...……………………………………………………………….. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. U. Walter Gutachter: Prof. Dr. G. Krohne Betreuer: Dr. Kai Schuh Tag des Promotionskolloquiums: …………………………………………… Doktorurkunde ausgehändigt am: …………………………………………… The present study was performed under supervision of Dr. Kai Schuh in the group of Prof. Dr. med. Ulrich Walter in the Institute of Clinical Biochemistry and Pathobiochemistry at the Julius-Maximilians-University of Würzburg. The dissertation was part of the MD/PhD program, organized by the IZKF of the University of Würzburg. Declaration: Hereby, I declare that the submitted dissertation was completed by myself and no others and that I have not used any sources or materials other than those enclosed. Moreover, I declare that the following dissertation has not been submitted further in this form or any other form and has not been used for obtaining any other equivalent qualification in any other organization. Additionally, other than this degree I have not applied or will attempt to apply for any other degree or qualification in relation to this work. Würzburg, (Dr. med. Karin Andrea Bundschu) In love for my husband Christoph and our son Sebastian Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SUMMARY.......................................................................................................... 5 2. ZUSAMMENFASSUNG ...................................................................................... 7 3. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 9 3.1. EVH-1 (ENA/VASP HOMOLOGY-1) DOMAIN PROTEINS....................................... 9 3.1.1. Ena/VASP proteins ................................................................................... 9 3.1.2. WASP proteins ....................................................................................... 10 3.1.3. Homer/Vesl proteins ............................................................................... 10 3.2. SPROUTY PROTEINS...................................................................................... 11 3.3. SPRED PROTEINS.......................................................................................... 13 3.4. THE MAP KINASE SIGNALING PATHWAY .......................................................... 15 3.5. KNOCKOUT STRATEGIES IN MICE .................................................................... 16 3.6. BONE GROWTH AND FGF-MEDIATED ENDOCHONDRAL OSSIFICATION ................. 19 3.7. AIM OF THE WORK ......................................................................................... 21 4. MATERIAL AND METHODS ............................................................................ 22 4.1. MOLECULAR-BIOLOGICAL METHODS................................................................ 22 4.1.1. Database analyzes of the mouse genome.............................................. 22 4.1.2. Isolation of plasmid DNA ........................................................................ 22 4.1.3. Isolation of genomic DNA of mouse tails and ES cells ........................... 22 4.1.4. DNA gel electrophoresis ......................................................................... 22 4.1.5. DNA purification of agarose gels ............................................................ 22 4.1.6. Purification of PCR products................................................................... 23 4.1.7. Cutting DNA by endonucleases.............................................................. 23 4.1.8. Dephosphorylation of DNA 5’ overhangs................................................ 23 4.1.9. Ligation/cloning of DNA fragments in a plasmid vector........................... 23 4.1.10. T/A-cloning.......................................................................................... 23 4.1.11. Generation of competent bacterias ..................................................... 23 4.1.12. Transformation of competent bacterias............................................... 24 4.1.13. Verification of inserts........................................................................... 24 4.1.14. LA- (long and accurate) PCR .............................................................. 25 4.1.15. Sequencing (Sanger method) ............................................................. 25 4.1.16. Southern blot analyzes........................................................................ 25 1 Table of Contents 4.1.17. Cloning of Spred-1 and Spred-2 full length cDNA in TOPO2.1 ........... 26 4.1.18. Cloning of Spred-1 and Spred-2 cDNA in pcDNA3.1/Myc-His ............ 27 4.1.19. RNA extraction of mouse tissues ........................................................ 27 4.1.20. DNA removal of RNA extracts............................................................. 28 4.1.21. RT- (Reverse Transcription) PCR ....................................................... 28 4.1.22. Northern blot analyzes ........................................................................ 28 4.2. HISTOLOGICAL METHODS............................................................................... 29 4.2.1. Paraffin sections and HE staining........................................................... 29 4.2.2. Immunohistochemistry............................................................................ 29 4.2.3. X-Gal staining ......................................................................................... 30 4.2.4. Toluidine staining.................................................................................... 30 4.3. CELL CULTURE ............................................................................................. 31 4.3.1. Transfection of HEK 293 cells................................................................. 31 4.3.2. Primary mouse chondrocyte culture ....................................................... 31 4.4. PROTEIN BIOCHEMICAL METHODS ................................................................... 31 4.4.1. Protein isolation of mouse tissues .......................................................... 31 4.4.2. Western blot analyzes ............................................................................ 32 4.4.3. Coomassie-blue protein staining of SDS gels......................................... 32 4.5. GENERATION AND AFFINITY PURIFICATION OF POLYCLONAL SPRED-1 AND SPRED-2 SPECIFIC ANTIBODIES ............................................................................................... 33 4.5.1. Expression and preparation of GST-Spred-1 and GST-Spred-2 fusion proteins.............................................................................................................. 33 4.5.2. Coupling of proteins to NHS-HiTrap columns ......................................... 35 4.5.3. Immunization of rabbits........................................................................... 35 4.5.4. Affinity purification of antisera................................................................. 35 4.6. GENERATION OF SPRED-2 KNOCKOUT MICE USING A GENE TRAP MODEL ............ 37 4.6.1. Gene trapping and Southern blot analysis.............................................. 37 4.6.2. Mouse breeding ...................................................................................... 38 4.6.3. Genotyping of mice................................................................................. 38 4.7. GENERATION OF SPRED-1 AND SPRED-2 KNOCKOUT MICE USING GENE TARGETING VECTORS ................................................................................................................ 39 4.7.1. General strategy ..................................................................................... 39 4.7.2. Cloning of Spred-1 and Spred-2 gene targeting vectors......................... 40 4.7.3. Optimization of the embryonic stem (ES) cell screening PCR ................ 45 2 Table of Contents 4.7.4. Electroporation and selection of ES cells................................................ 46 4.7.5. PCR screening of ES cells for homologous recombination events ......... 46 4.7.6. Cre-recombinase treatment of ES cells and PCR screening of different Cre-recombinase events for complete and conditional knockouts..................... 47 4.8. MOUSE PHYSIOLOGY..................................................................................... 48 4.8.1. Hormone measurements in mice............................................................ 48 4.8.2. Blood glucose measurements in mice .................................................... 48 4.8.3. Blood cell counts in mice ........................................................................ 48 4.8.4. Bleeding time measurements in mice ..................................................... 48 4.8.5. Bleeding volume measurements in mice ................................................ 48 4.8.6. Heart parameter measurements in mice................................................. 49 4.8.7. Estimation of bone lengths ..................................................................... 49 4.8.8. Statistical analyzes ................................................................................. 49 4.9. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT........................................................
Recommended publications
  • 14954 Spry2 (D3G1A) Rabbit Mab
    Revision 1 C 0 2 - t Spry2 (D3G1A) Rabbit mAb a e r o t S Orders: 877-616-CELL (2355) [email protected] 4 Support: 877-678-TECH (8324) 5 9 Web: [email protected] 4 www.cellsignal.com 1 # 3 Trask Lane Danvers Massachusetts 01923 USA For Research Use Only. Not For Use In Diagnostic Procedures. Applications: Reactivity: Sensitivity: MW (kDa): Source/Isotype: UniProt ID: Entrez-Gene Id: WB, IP H M R Endogenous 35 Rabbit IgG O43597 10253 Product Usage Information 7. Sánchez, A. et al. (2008) Oncogene 27, 4969-72. 8. Frank, M.J. et al. (2009) Blood 113, 2478-87. Application Dilution 9. Yim, D.G. et al. (2015) Oncogene 34, 474-84. 10. Okur, M.N. et al. (2014) Mol Cell Biol 34, 271-9. Western Blotting 1:1000 11. Mason, J.M. et al. (2004) Mol Biol Cell 15, 2176-88. Immunoprecipitation 1:100 12. Edwin, F. et al. (2009) Mol Pharmacol 76, 679-91. 13. Fong, C.W. et al. (2003) J Biol Chem 278, 33456-64. Storage Supplied in 10 mM sodium HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 100 µg/ml BSA, 50% glycerol and less than 0.02% sodium azide. Store at –20°C. Do not aliquot the antibody. Specificity / Sensitivity Spry2 (D3G1A) Rabbit mAb recognizes endogenous levels of total Spry2 protein. Species Reactivity: Human, Mouse, Rat Source / Purification Monoclonal antibody is produced by immunizing animals with a synthetic peptide corresponding to residues surrounding Pro71 of human Spry2 protein. Background The Sprouty (Spry) family of proteins are antagonists of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)- induced signaling (1, 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Modulation of the Progenitor Cell and Homeostatic Capacities of Müller Glia Cells in Retina
    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine 1201 Modulation of the Progenitor Cell and Homeostatic Capacities of Müller Glia Cells in Retina Focus on α2-Adrenergic and Endothelin Receptor Signaling Systems MOHAMMAD HARUN-OR-RASHID ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6206 ISBN 978-91-554-9527-5 UPPSALA urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-281569 2016 Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in B21, BMC, Husagatan 03, Uppsala, Thursday, 19 May 2016 at 09:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Faculty of Medicine). The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: Docent Per Ekström (Lund University). Abstract Harun-Or-Rashid, M. 2016. Modulation of the Progenitor Cell and Homeostatic Capacities of Müller Glia Cells in Retina. Focus on α2-Adrenergic and Endothelin Receptor Signaling Systems. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine 1201. 73 pp. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. ISBN 978-91-554-9527-5. Müller cells are major glial cells in the retina and have a broad range of functions that are vital for the retinal neurons. During retinal injury gliotic response either leads to Müller cell dedifferentiation and formation of a retinal progenitor or to maintenance of mature Müller cell functions. The overall aim of this thesis was to investigate the intra- and extracellular signaling of Müller cells, to understand how Müller cells communicate during an injury and how their properties can be regulated after injury. Focus has been on the α2-adrenergic receptor (α2-ADR) and endothelin receptor (EDNR)-induced modulation of Müller cell-properties after injury.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Abstract Book
    CONTENTS Table of Contents INFORMATION Continuing Medical Education .................................................................................................5 Guidelines for Speakers ..........................................................................................................6 Guidelines for Poster Presentations .........................................................................................8 SPEAKER ABSTRACTS Abstracts ...............................................................................................................................9 POSTER ABSTRACTS Basic Research (Location – Room 101) ...............................................................................63 Clinical (Location – Room 8) ..............................................................................................141 2018 Joint Global Neurofibromatosis Conference · Paris, France · November 2-6, 2018 | 3 4 | 2018 Joint Global Neurofibromatosis Conference · Paris, France · November 2-6, 2018 EACCME European Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education 2018 Joint Global Neurofibromatosis Conference Paris, France, 02/11/2018–06/11/2018 has been accredited by the European Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (EACCME®) for a maximum of 27 European CME credits (ECMEC®s). Each medical specialist should claim only those credits that he/she actually spent in the educational activity. The EACCME® is an institution of the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS), www.uems.net. Through an agreement between
    [Show full text]
  • Sprouty Proteins, Masterminds of Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Signaling
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by RERO DOC Digital Library Angiogenesis (2008) 11:53–62 DOI 10.1007/s10456-008-9089-1 ORIGINAL PAPER Sprouty proteins, masterminds of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling Miguel A. Cabrita Æ Gerhard Christofori Received: 14 December 2007 / Accepted: 7 January 2008 / Published online: 25 January 2008 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008 Abstract Angiogenesis relies on endothelial cells prop- Abbreviations erly processing signals from growth factors provided in Ang Angiopoietin both an autocrine and a paracrine manner. These mitogens c-Cbl Cellular homologue of Casitas B-lineage bind to their cognate receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) on lymphoma proto-oncogene product the cell surface, thereby activating a myriad of complex EGF Epidermal growth factor intracellular signaling pathways whose outputs include cell EGFR EGF receptor growth, migration, and morphogenesis. Understanding how eNOS Endothelial nitric oxide synthase these cascades are precisely controlled will provide insight ERK Extracellular signal-regulated kinase into physiological and pathological angiogenesis. The FGF Fibroblast growth factor Sprouty (Spry) family of proteins is a highly conserved FGFR FGF receptor group of negative feedback loop modulators of growth GDNF Glial-derived neurotrophic factor factor-mediated mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) Grb2 Growth factor receptor-bound protein 2 activation originally described in Drosophila. There are HMVEC Human microvascular endothelial cell four mammalian orthologs (Spry1-4) whose modulation of Hrs Hepatocyte growth factor-regulated tyrosine RTK-induced signaling pathways is growth factor – and kinase substrate cell context – dependant. Endothelial cells are a group of HUVEC Human umbilical vein endothelial cell highly differentiated cell types necessary for defining the MAPK Mitogen-activated protein kinase mammalian vasculature.
    [Show full text]
  • A Shared Molecular Mechanism Underlies the Human Rasopathies Legius Syndrome and Neurofibromatosis-1
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 27, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press RESEARCH COMMUNICATION it has been reported to function both upstream of and A shared molecular mechanism downstream from Ras (Wakioka et al. 2001; King et al. underlies the human 2005). Overexpression of Spred1 can increase Raf’s re- cruitment to the plasma membrane, where it associates rasopathies Legius syndrome with Ras without stimulating Raf activation (Wakioka and Neurofibromatosis-1 et al. 2001). Yet, this mechanism has never been fully refined and fails to explain how Spred1 prevents Raf ac- Irma B. Stowe,1 Ellen L. Mercado,1 tivation. A separate report suggests that Spred1 may pre- Timothy R. Stowe,2 Erika L. Bell,1 vent Ras activation, as evidenced by decreased Ras-GTP 3 3 levels when Spred1 is overexpressed (King et al. 2005). Juan A. Oses-Prieto, Hilda Herna´ndez, Heterozygous germline loss-of-function mutations have 3 1,4 Alma L. Burlingame, and Frank McCormick been identified in SPRED1 in Legius syndrome, a develop- 1 mental disorder that shares a number of phenotypes with Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Neurofibromatosis-1 (NF1) (Brems et al. 2007). Both syn- of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94158, 2 dromes are characterized as rasopathies, congenital devel- USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of opmental syndromes caused by germline mutations that California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, affect the Ras/MAPK pathway. Legius syndrome has been USA; 3Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of characterized as a milder form of NF1, with individuals California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA displaying multiple cafe´-au-lait spots, axillary freckling, and macrocephaly, but lacking other common NF1 man- The Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) path- ifestations such as Lisch nodules, neurofibromas, osseous way plays a critical role in transducing mitogenic signals lesions, or optic pathway gliomas.
    [Show full text]
  • NF1 Loss Is a Functional Genomic Event in Melanoma
    NFl LOSS IS A FUNCTIONAL GENOMIC EVENT IN MELANOMA by Moriah Heller Nissan A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Louis V. Gerstner, Jr. Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy New York, NY December, 2013 ]2~<;~ David B. Solit, MD Date Dissertation Mentor Copyright Moriah Heller Nissan 2013 Dedication “No man can reveal to you aught but that which already lies half asleep in the dawning of your knowledge. The teacher who walks in the shadow of the temple, among his followers, gives not of his wisdom but rather of his faith and his lovingness. If he is indeed wise he does not bid you enter the house of his wisdom, but rather leads you to the threshold of your own mind. The astronomer may speak to you of his understanding of space, but he cannot give you his understanding. The musician may sing to you of the rhythm which is in all space, but he cannot give you the ear which arrests the rhythm nor the voice that echoes it. And he who is versed in the science of numbers can tell of the regions of weight and measure, but he cannot conduct you thither. For the vision of one man lends not its wings to another man. And even as each one of you stands alone in God's knowledge, so must each one of you be alone in his knowledge of God and in his understanding of the earth.” -Kahlil Gibran, The Prophet For all of my teachers, in gratitude for their unfathomable patience.
    [Show full text]
  • Tumor Suppressor Spred2 Interaction with LC3 Promotes Autophagosome Maturation and Induces Autophagy-Dependent Cell Death
    www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget/ Oncotarget, Vol. 7, No. 18 Tumor suppressor Spred2 interaction with LC3 promotes autophagosome maturation and induces autophagy-dependent cell death Ke Jiang1,*, Min Liu1,*, Guibin Lin2, Beibei Mao3, Wei Cheng1, Han Liu1, Jozsef Gal4, Haining Zhu4, Zengqiang Yuan3, Wuguo Deng1, Quentin Liu1, Peng Gong2, Xiaolin Bi1, Songshu Meng1 1 Institute of Cancer Stem Cell, Dalian Medical University Cancer Center, Dalian, China 2DepartmentofHepatobiliarySurgery,TheFirstAffiliatedHospitalofDalianMedicalUniversity,Dalian,China 3 State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China 4 Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA *These authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Songshu Meng, e-mail: [email protected] Xiaolin Bi, e-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Spred2, LC3, p62/SQSTM1, autophagy, tumor suppressor Received: April 13, 2015 Accepted: March 12, 2016 Published: March 25, 2016 ABSTRACT The tumor suppressor Spred2 (Sprouty-related EVH1 domain-2) induces cell death in a variety of cancers. However, the underlying mechanism remains to be elucidated. Here we show that Spred2 induces caspase-independent but autophagy- dependent cell death in human cervical carcinoma HeLa and lung cancer A549 cells. We demonstrate that ectopic Spred2 increased both the conversion of microtubule- associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3), GFP-LC3 puncta formation and p62/SQSTM1 degradation in A549 and HeLa cells. Conversely, knockdown of Spred2 in tumor cells inhibited upregulation of autophagosome maturation induced by the autophagy inducer Rapamycin, which could be reversed by the rescue Spred2. These data suggest that Spred2 promotes autophagy in tumor cells.
    [Show full text]
  • SPRED Proteins Provide a NF-Ty Link to Ras Suppression
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 30, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press PERSPECTIVE SPRED proteins provide a NF-ty link to Ras suppression Andrea I. McClatchey1,5 and Karen Cichowski2,3,4,5 1Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Cancer Research, Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts 02129, USA; 2Genetics Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, USA; 3Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, USA; 4Ludwig Center at Dana-Farber, Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA Mutations in the SPRED1 (Sprouty-related protein with an complex and, in some instances, redundant mechanisms EVH [Ena/Vasp homology] domain 1) and NF1 (neurofi- by which this protein family functions highlight the bromatosis 1) genes underlie clinically related human dis- exquisite control that negative feedback pathways exert orders. The NF1-encoded protein neurofibromin is a Ras on intracellular signaling pathways and further suggest GTPase-activating protein (GAP) and can directly limit that this complexity has been biologically mandated. Ras activity. Spred proteins also negatively regulate Ras signaling, but the mechanism by which they do so is not clear. In the July 1, 2012, issue of Genes & Development, The history of Sprouty and Spred proteins Stowe and colleagues (pp. 1421–1426) present evidence Sprouty and Spred proteins share a conserved cysteine-rich that Spred1 recruits neurofibromin to the membrane, C-terminal domain that has been dubbed the Sprouty (SPR) where it dampens growth factor-induced Ras activity, domain; beyond that, their domain architectures are distinct providing a satisfying explanation for the overlapping (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • 13264 Spry2 Antibody
    C 0 2 - t Spry2 Antibody a e r o t S Orders: 877-616-CELL (2355) [email protected] 4 Support: 877-678-TECH (8324) 6 2 Web: [email protected] 3 www.cellsignal.com 1 # 3 Trask Lane Danvers Massachusetts 01923 USA For Research Use Only. Not For Use In Diagnostic Procedures. Applications: Reactivity: Sensitivity: MW (kDa): Source: UniProt ID: Entrez-Gene Id: WB, IP H M Endogenous 35 Rabbit O43597 10253 Product Usage Information 5. Herold, T. et al. (2014) Blood 124, 1304-11. 6. Gao, M. et al. (2012) EMBO Mol Med 4, 776-90. Application Dilution 7. Sánchez, A. et al. (2008) Oncogene 27, 4969-72. 8. Frank, M.J. et al. (2009) Blood 113, 2478-87. Western Blotting 1:1000 9. Yim, D.G. et al. (2014) Oncogene , [Epub ahead of print]. Immunoprecipitation 1:100 10. Okur, M.N. et al. (2014) Mol Cell Biol 34, 271-9. 11. Mason, J.M. et al. (2004) Mol Biol Cell 15, 2176-88. 12. Edwin, F. et al. (2009) Mol Pharmacol 76, 679-91. Storage 13. Fong, C.W. et al. (2003) J Biol Chem 278, 33456-64. Supplied in 10 mM sodium HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 100 µg/ml BSA and 50% glycerol. Store at –20°C. Do not aliquot the antibody. Specificity / Sensitivity Spry2 Antibody recognizes endogenous levels of total Spry2 protein. This antibody may also cross-react with an unidentified protein of 75 kDa. Species Reactivity: Human, Mouse Source / Purification Polyclonal antibodies are produced by immunizing animals with a synthetic peptide corresponding to residues surrounding Pro71 of human Spry2 protein.
    [Show full text]
  • SPRED Proteins and Their Roles in Signal Transduction, Development, and Malignancy
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 25, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW SPRED proteins and their roles in signal transduction, development, and malignancy Claire Lorenzo and Frank McCormick Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94158, USA The roles of SPRED proteins in signaling, development, Ras signaling is tightly controlled; hyperactive Ras sig- and cancer are becoming increasingly recognized. SPRED naling results in diseases such as cancer, developmental proteins comprise an N-terminal EVH-1 domain, a central disorders (known collectively as RASopathies) and learn- c-Kit-binding domain, and C-terminal SROUTY domain. ing disabilities (Simanshu et al. 2017). To maintain tight They negatively regulate signaling from tyrosine kinases control of Ras activity, numerous signals and interactions to the Ras–MAPK pathway. SPRED1 binds directly to regulate the duration, magnitude and context of Ras acti- both c-KIT and to the RasGAP, neurofibromin, whose vation. SPRED proteins, and their better-known relatives, function is completely dependent on this interaction. proteins of the Sprouty family, are negative regulators of Loss-of-function mutations in SPRED1 occur in human Ras signaling. Although SPRED and Sprouty proteins cancers and cause the developmental disorder, Legius syn- share a conserved C-terminal Sprouty (SPR) domain, the drome. Genetic ablation of SPRED genes in mice leads to mechanisms by which they regulate Ras signaling are behavioral problems, dwarfism, and multiple other phe- distinct. notypes including increased risk of leukemia. In this The SPROUTY gene was first identified as a negative review, we summarize and discuss biochemical, struc- regulator of FGF signaling and tracheal branching in Dro- tural, and biological functions of these proteins including sophila (Hacohen et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Spredisasprouty-Relatedsuppressor of Ras Signalling
    letters to nature To evaluate tyrosine phosphorylation of IkBa30 after treatment of cells with EPO, lysates 23. Lezoualc'h, F., Sagara, Y., Holsboer, F. & Behl, C. High constitutive NF-kB activity mediates resistance were immunoprecipitated with anti-IkBa and then probed with anti-phosphotyrosine to oxidative stress in neuronal cells. J. Neurosci. 18, 3224±3232 (1998). antibodies. To detect serine phosphorylation of IkBa, lysates were immunoblotted 24. Ihle, J. N., Witthuhn, B. A., Quelle, F. W., Yamamoto, K. & Silvennoinen, O. Signaling through the without immunoprecipitation and probed directly with antibodies speci®c for hematopoietic cytokine receptors. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 13, 369±398 (1995). phosphorylation of IkBa serine residues 32 and 36 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). For Jak2 25. Meydan, N. et al. Inhibition of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia by a Jak-2 inhibitor. Nature 379, 645± in vitro kinase assays, after cell lysis Jak2 was immunoprecipitated with 20 mg of a 648 (1996). polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Jak2 was then resuspended in kinase 26. Briscoe, J. et al. Kinase-negative mutants of JAK1 can sustain interferon-gamma-inducible gene expression but not an antiviral state. EMBO J. 15, 799±809 (1996). buffer (including 25 mM HEPES, 25 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM Na-orthovanadate and 2 mM dithiothreitol) plus 10 mM ATP and 30 mg full-length recombinant IkBa. After reaction 27. Zhuang, H. et al. Inhibition of erythropoietin-induced mitogenesis by a kinase-de®cient form of Jak2. for 30 min, anti-IkBa immune complexes were resolved by SDS±PAGE, probed with anti- J. Biol. Chem. 269, 21411±21414 (1994).
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW Sprouty Proteins
    191 REVIEW Sprouty proteins: modified modulators, matchmakers or missing links? G R Guy, R A Jackson, P Yusoff and S Y Chow Signal Transduction Laboratory, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Room 3-14B, Singapore, Republic of Singapore 138673 (Correspondence should be addressed to G R Guy; Email: [email protected]) Abstract Sprouty proteins are involved in organogenesis, particularly CRD, predominantly by serine/threonine kinases that target during the branching of endothelial tubes, and existing sites within the SRM on Sprouty. Some of the resultant evidence suggests that Sprouty’s point of action lies down- increase in phosphorylation is opposed by activated protein stream of receptor signaling to inhibit the activation of the phosphatase 2A that binds to the N-terminal Cbl-TKB central Ras/Erk pathway. How Sprouty proteins accomplish binding motif. Significantly, two ubiquitin E3 ligases also bind their inhibitory action and whether they interact with other to the N-terminus of Sprouty: c-Cbl binds with high affinity signaling pathways are significant questions. Sprouty proteins to the TKB binding motif and SIAH2 binds constitutively to are devoid of any recognizable protein interaction domain, a different site; both proteins are able to direct the ubiquiti- and clues as to how they function have been mainly derived nation of Sprouty proteins and its destruction. The collective from screening for interacting partners. Conserved across all evidence points to Sprouty proteins as being substantially the Sprouty proteins are three sequences: a Cbl-tyrosine covalently-modified to control its location, stability, associ- kinase-binding (TKB) binding motif centered on an ation, and destruction.
    [Show full text]