Peripheral Dopamine 2-Receptor Antagonist Reverses Hypertension in a Chronic Intermittent Hypoxia Rat Model
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
What Are the Acute Treatments for Migraine and How Are They Used?
2. Acute Treatment CQ II-2-1 What are the acute treatments for migraine and how are they used? Recommendation The mainstay of acute treatment for migraine is pharmacotherapy. The drugs used include (1) acetaminophen, (2) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), (3) ergotamines, (4) triptans and (5) antiemetics. Stratified treatment according to the severity of migraine is recommended: use NSAIDs such as aspirin and naproxen for mild to moderate headache, and use triptans for moderate to severe headache, or even mild to moderate headache when NSAIDs were ineffective in the past. It is necessary to give guidance and cautions to patients having acute attacks, and explain the methods of using medications (timing, dose, frequency of use) and medication use during pregnancy and breast-feeding. Grade A Background and Objective The objective of acute treatment is to resolve the migraine attack completely and rapidly and restore the patient’s normal functions. An ideal treatment should have the following characteristics: (1) resolves pain and associated symptoms rapidly; (2) is consistently effective; (3) no recurrence; (4) no need for additional use of medication; (5) no adverse effects; (6) can be administered by the patients themselves; and (7) low cost. Literature was searched to identify acute treatments that satisfy the above conditions. Comments and Evidence The acute treatment drugs for migraine generally include (1) acetaminophens, (2) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), (3) ergotamines, (4) triptans, and (5) antiemetics. For severe migraines including status migrainosus and migraine attacks refractory to treatment, (6) anesthetics, and (7) corticosteroids (dexamethasone) are used (Tables 1 and 2).1)-9) There are two approaches to the selection and sequencing of these medications: “step care” and “stratified care”. -
Oxygen Chemoreception by Carotid Body Cells in Culture (Glomus Cells/Dopamine/Hypoxia/Sensory Cells) MARK C
Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 82, pp. 1448-1450, March 1985 Cell Biology Oxygen chemoreception by carotid body cells in culture (glomus cells/dopamine/hypoxia/sensory cells) MARK C. FISHMAN*t#§¶, WILLIAM L. GREENEt§, AND DoRos PLATIKAt¶ *Howard Hughes Medical Institute, tThe Developmental Biology Laboratory (Medical Services), and *Neurology Services of the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114; and Departments of §Medicine and ¶Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 Communicated by Jerome Gross, October 29, 1984 ABSTRACT Chemoreceptors for oxygen reside within the enrichment procedure. Hypoxic conditions were identical carotid body, but it is not known which cells actually sense except that the Po2 was diminished to 36 mm Hg. Since there hypoxia and by what mechanisms they transduce this informa- are only a few thousand cells in the carotid body, each ex- tion into afferent signals in the carotid sinus nerve. We have periment necessitated the pooling of dissociated cells of 10- developed systems for the growth of glomus cells of the carotid 12 rats and subsequent distribution to two plates, one to be body in dissociated cell culture. Here we demonstrate that, as used for control and one for hypoxic conditions. Cells in in vivo, these cells contain the putative neurotransmitters do- both plates for each experiment were grown in culture for pamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine. Oxygen tension regu- the same period of time. Experiments were performed after lates the rate of dopamine secretion from the glomus cells. culturing of the cells for 5-7 days. Similar to chemically stimulated catecholamine secretion from Prior to testing the cells were washed twice in Hanks' bal- other adrenergic cells this hypoxia-stimulated release requires anced salt solution supplemented with 100 ,uM pargyline/5 extracellular calcium. -
Drugs That Can Cause Delirium (Anticholinergic / Toxic Metabolites)
Drugs that can Cause Delirium (anticholinergic / toxic metabolites) Deliriants (drugs causing delirium) Prescription drugs . Central acting agents – Sedative hypnotics (e.g., benzodiazepines) – Anticonvulsants (e.g., barbiturates) – Antiparkinsonian agents (e.g., benztropine, trihexyphenidyl) . Analgesics – Narcotics (NB. meperidine*) – Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs* . Antihistamines (first generation, e.g., hydroxyzine) . Gastrointestinal agents – Antispasmodics – H2-blockers* . Antinauseants – Scopolamine – Dimenhydrinate . Antibiotics – Fluoroquinolones* . Psychotropic medications – Tricyclic antidepressants – Lithium* . Cardiac medications – Antiarrhythmics – Digitalis* – Antihypertensives (b-blockers, methyldopa) . Miscellaneous – Skeletal muscle relaxants – Steroids Over the counter medications and complementary/alternative medications . Antihistamines (NB. first generation) – diphenhydramine, chlorpheniramine). Antinauseants – dimenhydrinate, scopolamine . Liquid medications containing alcohol . Mandrake . Henbane . Jimson weed . Atropa belladonna extract * Requires adjustment in renal impairment. From: K Alagiakrishnan, C A Wiens. (2004). An approach to drug induced delirium in the elderly. Postgrad Med J, 80, 388–393. Delirium in the Older Person: A Medical Emergency. Island Health www.viha.ca/mhas/resources/delirium/ Drugs that can cause delirium. Reviewed: 8-2014 Some commonly used medications with moderate to high anticholinergic properties and alternative suggestions Type of medication Alternatives with less deliriogenic -
Carotid Sinus Syndrome As a Manifestation of Head and Neck
Mehta et al. Int J Clin Cardiol 2014, 1:2 ISSN: 2378-2951 International Journal of Clinical Cardiology Research Article: Open Access Carotid Sinus Syndrome as a Manifestation of Head and Neck Cancer - Case Report and Literature Review Nikhil Mehta*, Medhat Abdelmessih, Lachlan Smith, Daniel Jacoby and Mark Marieb Yale School of Medicine, USA *Corresponding author: Nikhil Mehta, 1180 Chapel Street, New Haven, CT-06511, USA, E-mail: [email protected] In 1799, Parry noticed that the heart rate can be slowed by Abstract applying pressure over one of the carotid sinuses [3]. An exaggerated Head and neck cancers rarely manifest as Carotid Sinus Syndrome response to this maneuver is called Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity (CSS). CSS is a rare complex of symptoms found in 1% of all (CSH). Most patients with CSH are asymptomatic [4,5]. However, patients who experience syncope, the pathophysiology of which is sometimes CSH can manifestas hypotension, cerebral ischemia, yet to be fully understood. Common trigger mechanisms for CSS spontaneous dizziness or syncope, and this is termed Carotid Sinus include neck movement, shaving, constricting neck wear, coughing, sneezing and straining to lift heavy objects. The left carotid sinus Syndrome (CSS). The incidence of CSS increases with advancing age mainly causes AV block while the right carotid sinus mainly causes [2,6]. Spontaneous CSS is a rare phenomenon, found in 1 percent of sinus bradycardia. The incidence of AV block in CSS is very low all cases of syncope [4]. Induced CSS is much more common, found (4.9 to 16.7%) as reported in many case series. -
Yorkshire Palliative Medicine Clinical Guidelines Group Guidelines on the Use of Antiemetics Author(S): Dr Annette Edwards (Chai
Yorkshire Palliative Medicine Clinical Guidelines Group Guidelines on the use of Antiemetics Author(s): Dr Annette Edwards (Chair) and Deborah Royle on behalf of the Yorkshire Palliative Medicine Clinical Guidelines Group Overall objective : To provide guidance on the evidence for the use of antiemetics in specialist palliative care. Search Strategy: Search strategy: Medline, Embase and Cinahl databases were searched using the words nausea, vomit$, emesis, antiemetic and drug name. Review Date: March 2008 Competing interests: None declared Disclaimer: These guidelines are the property of the Yorkshire Palliative Medicine Clinical Guidelines Group. They are intended to be used by qualified, specialist palliative care professionals as an information resource. They should be used in the clinical context of each individual patient’s needs. The clinical guidelines group takes no responsibility for any consequences of any actions taken as a result of using these guidelines. Contact Details: Dr Annette Edwards, Macmillan Consultant in Palliative Medicine, Department of Palliative Medicine, Pinderfields General Hospital, Aberford Road, Wakefield, WF1 4DG Tel: 01924 212290 E-mail: [email protected] 1 Introduction: Nausea and vomiting are common symptoms in patients with advanced cancer. A careful history, examination and appropriate investigations may help to infer the pathophysiological mechanism involved. Where possible and clinically appropriate aetiological factors should be corrected. Antiemetics are chosen based on the likely mechanism and the neurotransmitters involved in the emetic pathway. However, a recent systematic review has highlighted that evidence for the management of nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer is sparse. (Glare 2004) The following drug and non-drug treatments were reviewed to assess the strength of evidence for their use as antiemetics with particular emphasis on their use in the palliative care population. -
Cabergoline Patient Handout
Cabergoline For the Patient: Cabergoline Other names: DOSTINEX® • Cabergoline (ca-BERG-go-leen) is used to treat cancers that cause the body to produce too much of a hormone called prolactin. Cabergoline helps decrease the size of the cancer and the production of prolactin. It is a tablet that you take by mouth. • Tell your doctor if you have ever had an unusual or allergic reaction to bromocriptine or other ergot derivatives, such as pergoline (PERMAX®) and methysergide (SANSERT®), before taking cabergoline. • Blood tests and blood pressure measurement may be taken while you are taking cabergoline. The dose of cabergoline may be changed based on the test results and/or other side effects. • It is important to take cabergoline exactly as directed by your doctor. Make sure you understand the directions. Take cabergoline with food. • If you miss a dose of cabergoline, take it as soon as you can if it is within 2 days of the missed dose. If it is over 2 days since your missed dose, skip the missed dose and go back to your usual dosing times. • Other drugs such as azithromycin (ZITHROMAX®), clarithromycin (BIAXIN®), erythromycin, domperidone, metoclopramide, and some drugs used to treat mental or mood problems may interact with cabergoline. Tell your doctor if you are taking these or any other drugs as you may need extra blood tests or your dose may need to be changed. Check with your doctor or pharmacist before you start or stop taking any other drugs. • The drinking of alcohol (in small amounts) does not appear to affect the safety or usefulness of cabergoline. -
Carotid Body Detection on CT Angiography
ORIGINAL RESEARCH Carotid Body Detection on CT Angiography R.P. Nguyen BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Advances in multidetector CT provide exquisite detail with improved L.M. Shah delineation of the normal anatomic structures in the head and neck. The carotid body is 1 structure that is now routinely depicted with this new imaging technique. An understanding of the size range of the E.P. Quigley normal carotid body will allow the radiologist to distinguish patients with prominent normal carotid H.R. Harnsberger bodies from those who have a small carotid body paraganglioma. R.H. Wiggins MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 180 CTAs to assess the imaging appearance of the normal carotid body in its expected anatomic location. RESULTS: The carotid body was detected in Ͼ80% of carotid bifurcations. The normal size range measured from 1.1 to 3.9 mm Ϯ 2 SDs, which is consistent with the reported values from anatomic dissections. CONCLUSIONS: An ovoid avidly enhancing structure at the inferomedial aspect of the carotid bifurca- tion within the above range should be considered a normal carotid body. When the carotid body measures Ͼ6 mm, a small carotid body paraganglioma should be suspected and further evaluated. ABBREVIATIONS: AP ϭ anteroposterior; CTA ϭ CT angiography he carotid body is a structure usually located within the glomus jugulare; and at the cochlear promontory, a glomus Tadventitia of the common carotid artery at the inferome- tympanicum.5 There have been rare reports of paraganglio- dial aspect of the carotid -
PRESCRIBED DRUGS and NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATIONS K a Grosset, D G Grosset Iii2
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.2004.045757 on 16 August 2004. Downloaded from PRESCRIBED DRUGS AND NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATIONS K A Grosset, D G Grosset iii2 J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75(Suppl III):iii2–iii8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.045757 treatment history is a fundamental part of the healthcare consultation. Current drugs (prescribed, over the counter, herbal remedies, drugs of misuse) and how they are taken A(frequency, timing, missed and extra doses), drugs tried previously and reason for discontinuation, treatment response, adverse effects, allergies, and intolerances should be taken into account. Recent immunisations may also be of importance. This article examines the particular relevance of medication in patients presenting with neurological symptoms. Drugs and their interactions may contribute in part or fully to the neurological syndrome, and treatment response may assist diagnostically or in future management plans. Knowledge of medicine taking behaviour may clarify clinical presentations such as analgesic overuse causing chronic daily headache, or severe dyskinesia resulting from obsessive use of dopamine replacement treatment. In most cases, iatrogenic symptoms are best managed by withdrawal of the offending drug. Indirect mechanisms whereby drugs could cause neurological problems are beyond the scope of the current article—for example, drugs which raise blood pressure or which worsen glycaemic control and consequently increase the risk of cerebrovascular disease, or immunosupressants -
Action of LSD on Supersensitive Mesolimbic Dopamine Receptors
PROCEEDINGS OF THE B.P.S., 15th-17th SEPTEMBER, 1975 291P Action of LSD on supersensitive The rotation produced by LSD is therefore mesolimbic dopamine receptors probably due to an action on striatal dopamine receptors. P.H. KELLY To investigate whether LSD can act as an agonist at mesolimbic dopamine receptors we Psychological Laboratory, Downing St., Cambridge and recorded its effect in rats with bilateral 6-OHDA M. R. C Unit of Neurochemical Pharmacology, Medical lesions of the nucleus accumbens. These animals School, Hills Road, Cambridge show a greatly enhanced stimulation of locomotor activity when injected with dopamine agonists Since Ungerstedt & Arbuthnott (1970) described such as apomorphine (Kelly, Seviour & Iversen, the amphetamine-induced rotation of rats with 1975) or N-n-propylnorapomorphine (Kelly, Miller unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesions of & Neumeyer, 1975) compared to sham-operated the substantia nigra this in vivo preparation has animals, which may be due to supersensitivity of been widely used to study the effects of drugs on the denervated mesolimbic DA receptors. LSD dopaminergic mechanism in the brain. Recently it (1.0 mg/kg i.p.), like apomorphine (1.0 mg/kg has been shown that LSD, like the dopamine i.p.), produced a marked stimulation of locomotor agonist apomorphine, produces rotation towards activity in these animals although this dose did not the unlesioned side (Pieri, Pieri & Haefely, 1974) increase the locomotor activity of control rats. and it was suggested that LSD can act as a The non-hallucinogen (+)-bromo-lysergic acid dopamine agonist. Since 6-OHDA lesions of the diethylamide (2.0 mg/kg i.p.) did not stimulate substantia nigra which destroy the nigrostriatal locomotor activity in 6-OHDA treated rats. -
Carotid Chemoreflex Endocrine Vasoconstrictors #NO Nitric
Fetal hypoxia Glossopharyngeal (IXth) nerve Cardiovascular centre in medulla Carotid body and sinus Vagus (Xth) nerve nerve Carotid chemoreflex Endocrine vasoconstrictors Sympathetic chain Vasculature Vascular oxidant tone •O - •NO 2 : Superoxide Anion Nitric Oxide The Fetal Brain Sparing Response to Hypoxia: Physiological Mechanisms Dino A Giussani Department of Physiology, Development & Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EG, UK Journal: Journal of Physiology Submission: Invited Review Key Words: Fetus, Hypoxia, Cardiovascular, Chemoreflex, Nitric Oxide, Reactive Oxygen Species, IUGR, Intra-partum hypoxia, Asphyxia, Cerebral palsy Running Title: Fetal Brain Sparing Correspondence: Professor Dino A Giussani, Ph.D. Department of Physiology Development & Neuroscience Downing Street University of Cambridge Cambridge CB2 3EG UK Tel: +44 1223 333894 E-mail: [email protected] 1 1 ABSTRACT 2 3 How the fetus withstands an environment of reduced oxygenation during life in the 4 womb has been a vibrant area of research since this field was introduced by Joseph 5 Barcroft, a century ago. Studies spanning five decades have since used the 6 chronically instrumented fetal sheep preparation to investigate the fetal 7 compensatory responses to hypoxia. This defence is contingent on the fetal 8 cardiovascular system, which in late gestation adopts strategies to decrease oxygen 9 consumption and redistribute the cardiac output away from peripheral vascular 10 beds and towards essential circulations, such as those perfusing the brain. The 11 introduction of simultaneous measurement of blood flow in the fetal carotid and 12 femoral circulations by ultrasonic transducers has permitted investigation of the 13 dynamics of the fetal brain sparing response for the first time. -
Evidence for Effective Acute Attack Treatment in Migraine
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences Turk J Med Sci (2017) 47: 343-347 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/medical/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/sag-1601-195 Metoclopramide inhibits trigeminovascular activation: evidence for effective acute attack treatment in migraine 1,2,3 1,3 3,4 1,3, Hacer DOĞANAY AYDIN , Doğa VURALLI , Didem Tuba AKÇALI , Hayrunnisa BOLAY * 1 Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey 2 Department of Neurology, Konya Training and Research Hospital, Konya, Turkey 3 Neuropsychiatry Center, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey 4 Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey Received: 01.02.2016 Accepted/Published Online: 08.05.2016 Final Version: 27.02.2017 Background/aim: Metoclopramide is an effective and commonly used medication in acute migraine treatment but an experimental evidence base is lacking. We aimed to investigate the antimigraine effect of metoclopramide in a migraine model and whether the analgesic effect of metoclopramide was likely to be 2D receptor-mediated. Materials and methods: Cortical spreading depression (CSD) was used to model migraine in adult male Wistar rats. Five CSDs were induced by pinprick. Metoclopramide (two different doses), raclopride, or 0.9% saline were administered 30 min before CSD induction. Two hours after the experiments, brain tissues were examined for c-fos activation. Results: In metoclopramide groups brain stem c-fos expression was significantly lower than in the CSD side of the saline group (P = 0.002). In the raclopride group, ipsilateral brain stem c-fos expression was also lower than in the saline group (P = 0.002). -
NEUROPHARMACOLOGICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN DOMPERIDONE and METOCLOPRAMIDE Abstract-Domperidone, a New Gastrokinetic with Potent
In in vitro binding assays, domperidone In in vitro experiments on the isolated was found to be a potent and specific guinea-pig stomach, domperidone selectively dopamine antagonist, but ex vivo and in vivo NEUROPHARMACOLOGICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN DOMPERIDONE AND METOCLOPRAMIDE A. WAUQUIER, C.J.E. NIEMEGEERS and P.A.J. JANSSEN Department of Pharmacology, Janssen Pharmaceutica , B-2340 Beerse, Belgium Accepted October 17, 1980 Abstract-Domperidone, a new gastrokinetic with potent antiemetic properties is devoid of central effects, up to high dose levels. To assess the CNS activity of domperidone and metoclopramide, the inhibition of intracranial self-stimulation (ICS) in two different situations, and the influence on EEG in dogs were studied. The dissociation between the antiemetic and central effects of both compounds were evaluated in dogs given a stereotypogenic dose of apomorphine. A significant and dose related inhibition of ICS (conditioned situation) was obtained with 0.8 and 1.6 mg/kg i.v. domperidone and with 0.125, 0.25 and 0.50 mg/kg i.v. metoclopramide. The ED50 values were 0.79 mg/kg and 0.25 mg/kg respectively. The effect was most pronounced 4 hr after administration with domperidone and 15 min after administration with metoclopramide. In the EEG studies, no specific structure-related effects were found but the total potency was increased with domperidone 0.8 and 1.6 mg/kg i.v. and with metoclopramide 0.063, 0.125, 0.25 and 0.50 mg/kg i.v. This increase was due to a decrease in fast frequencies, an increase of slower frequencies and a slight increase of the amplitude.