DOCSLIB.ORG

Association Between Use of Antithrombotic Medication and Hematuria-Related Complications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Association Between Use of Antithrombotic Medication and Hematuria-Related Complications Research JAMA | Original Investigation Association Between Use of Antithrombotic Medication and Hematuria-Related Complications Christopher J. D. Wallis, MD, PhD; Tristan Juvet, MD; Yuna Lee, MD, MEd; Rano Matta, MD, MSc; Sender Herschorn, MD; Ronald Kodama, MD; Girish S. Kulkarni, MD, PhD; Raj Satkunasivam, MD, MPH; William Geerts, MD; Anne McLeod, MD; Steven A. Narod, MD; Robert K. Nam, MD, MSc Related article page 1250 IMPORTANCE Antithrombotic medications are among the most commonly prescribed Supplemental content medications. OBJECTIVE To characterize rates of hematuria-related complications among patients taking antithrombotic medications. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Population-based, retrospective cohort study including all citizens in Ontario, Canada, aged 66 years and older between 2002 and 2014. The final follow-up date was December 31, 2014. EXPOSURES Receipt of an oral anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Hematuria-related complications, defined as emergency department visit, hospitalization, or a urologic procedure to investigate or manage gross hematuria. RESULTS Among 2 518 064 patients, 808 897 (mean [SD] age, 72.1 [6.8] years; 428 531 [53%] women) received at least 1 prescription for an antithrombotic agent over the study period. Over a median follow-up of 7.3 years, the rates of hematuria-related complications were 123.95 events per 1000 person-years among patients actively exposed to antithrombotic agents vs 80.17 events per 1000 person-years among patients not exposed to these drugs (difference, 43.8; 95% CI, 43.0-44.6; P < .001, and incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.44; 95% CI, 1.42-1.46). The rates of complications among exposed vs unexposed patients (80.17 events/1000 person-years) were 105.78 for urologic procedures (difference, 33.5; 95% CI, 32.8-34.3; P < .001, and IRR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.36-1.39), 11.12 for hospitalizations (difference, 5.7; 95% CI, 5.5-5.9; P < .001, and IRR, 2.03; 95% CI, 2.00-2.06), and 7.05 for emergency department visits (difference, 4.5; 95% CI, 4.3-4.7; P < .001, and IRR, 2.80; 95% CI, 2.74-2.86). Compared with patients who were unexposed to thrombotic agents, the rates of hematuria-related complications were 191.61 events per 1000 person-years (difference, 117.3; 95% CI, 112.8-121.8) for those exposed to both an anticoagulant and antiplatelet agent (IRR, 10.48; 95% CI, 8.16-13.45), 140.92 (difference, 57.7; 95% CI, 56.9-58.4) for those exposed to anticoagulants (IRR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.52-1.59), and 110.72 (difference, 26.5; 95% CI, 25.9-27.0) for those exposed to antiplatelet agents (IRR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.29-1.33). Patients exposed to antithrombotic agents, compared with patients not exposed to these drugs, were more likely to be diagnosed as having bladder cancer within 6 months (0.70% vs 0.38%; odds ratio, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.79-1.92). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among older adults in Ontario, Canada, use of antithrombotic medications, compared with nonuse of these medications, was significantly associated with higher rates of hematuria-related complications (including emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and urologic procedures to manage gross hematuria). Author Affiliations: Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article. Corresponding Author: Robert K. Nam, MD, MSc, Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Room MG-406, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada JAMA. 2017;318(13):1260-1271. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.13890 ([email protected]). 1260 (Reprinted) jama.com © 2017 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 10/01/2021 Antithrombotic Medication Use and Hematuria-Related Complications Original Investigation Research ntithrombotic agents are among the most com- monly prescribed medications for older adults in Key Points North America.1 Oral anticoagulants are indicated for A Question Is there an association between the use of oral primary and secondary prevention of stroke and systemic em- antithrombotic agents and hematuria-related complications? bolism, as well as treatment of venous thromboembolism.2 Findings In this cohort study that included 2 518 064 older adults Antiplatelet agents are indicated for primary and secondary in Ontario, Canada, use of antithrombotic medications, compared prevention of cardiovascular disease.3 Despite proven ben- with nonuse of these medications, was significantly associated efits, antithrombotic agents are among the medications with hematuria-related complications (including emergency most commonly associated with adverse events4 and have department visits, hospitalizations, and urologic procedures). contributed to nearly half of all adverse drug events.5 Fur- Meaning Use of antithrombotic medications was associated with ther, the rates of these adverse events are increasing.4 To date, a significant increase in rates of hematuria-related complications. published randomized clinical trials and observational stud- ies of antithrombotic agents have focused on intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, and all-cause bleed- excluded individuals who died and those who emigrated prior ing as adverse events.6,7 to the index date. We further excluded patients diagnosed as To our knowledge, a complication that has not been having a cancer (other than nonmelanomatous skin cancer) examined as the primary outcome in patients treated with prior to the index date and those with prior endoscopic uro- antithrombotic agents is hematuria. While hematuria repre- logic procedures as these are likely to significantly affect a pa- sents a less life-threatening adverse event than intracranial or tient’s likelihood of hematuria-related complications. We also gastrointestinal bleeding, it is common and involves diagnos- excluded patients older than the age of 105 years. tic evaluation including abdominal imaging and invasive From linked databases, we collected demographic testing8,9 and management. The prevalence, severity, and information including patient age at the time of each pre- risk factors for hematuria associated with the use of anti- scription, geographic location (local health integration thrombotic agents are largely unknown. To better character- networks12), sex, geographically derived socioeconomic sta- ize this association, this analysis examined rates of gross tus, rurality, and general comorbidity (Johns Hopkins aggre- hematuria-related complications including hospitalization, gate disease group13). The Johns Hopkins aggregate disease emergency department visits, and urologic interventions group has better discrimination than the Charlson score in over a 13-year period among patients who received antico- comorbidity assessment.14 agulant or antiplatelet therapy from a population-based cohort of adults aged 66 years or older in Ontario, Canada. Exposure The primary exposure was use of any oral antithrombotic agent, including anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications for which Methods the first prescription occurred during the study interval (eTable 1intheSupplement). We operationalized antithrombotic ex- We conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study posure in an intermittent, time-varying fashion (examples of of patients aged 66 years or older in Ontario, Canada, between operationalization of this exposure are in the eFigure in the April 2002 and December 2014 using data from the Institute Supplement). Age 66 years was selected for cohort inclusion of Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES). In Ontario, medical care to allow for a 1-year look-back to ensure that patients were not is reimbursed by a single, government-operated health insur- exposed to antithrombotic agents prior to study entry. ance system (Ontario Health Insurance Plan). The cost of pre- On the date of filling their first prescription during the study scription medications is covered for all patients starting at age interval, patients were considered “exposed” and remained 65 years through the Ontario Drug Benefit. exposed until 14 days following the prescription end date This study was designed and conducted according to (washout period). Fifteen days following the prescription end the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies date, patients were considered to be “unexposed.” When the in Epidemiology guidelines10 and Reporting of Studies Con- washout period coincided with prescription renewal, pa- ducted Using Observational Routinely-Collected Health Data tients had continuous, ongoing exposure. When patients dis- Statement.11 The Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Re- continued antithrombotic therapy and then restarted after dis- search Ethics Board approved this study. Individual informed continuation, a new exposure period commenced. Similarly, consent was waived owing to the anonymous, aggregated na- when patients switched medications, exposure and outcome ture of the data. time was allocated to each medication during the prescrip- tion period plus the 14-day washout period. Study Patients We identified all residents of Ontario born before 1936, who Outcomes would be aged 66 years or older during the study interval We measured counts of total hematuria-related complica- (2002-2014), based on date of birth using unique identifiers tions, which was the sum of the counts of 3 specific end points (ICES key number). The index date was defined as each per- including the occurrence of emergency department visits for son’s 66th birthday. To include only those patients actively re- gross hematuria, hospital admissions with
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anticoagulant Effects of Statins and Their Clinical Implications
    Review Article 1 Anticoagulant effects of statins and their clinical implications Anetta Undas1; Kathleen E. Brummel-Ziedins2; Kenneth G. Mann2 1Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University School of Medicine, and John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland; 2Department of Biochemistry, University of Vermont, Colchester, Vermont, USA Summary cleavage, factor V and factor XIII activation, as well as enhanced en- There is evidence indicating that statins (3-hydroxy-methylglutaryl dothelial thrombomodulin expression, resulting in increased protein C coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) may produce several cholesterol-inde- activation and factor Va inactivation. Observational studies and one ran- pendent antithrombotic effects. In this review, we provide an update on domized trial have shown reduced VTE risk in subjects receiving statins, the current understanding of the interactions between statins and blood although their findings still generate much controversy and suggest that coagulation and their potential relevance to the prevention of venous the most potent statin rosuvastatin exerts the largest effect. thromboembolism (VTE). Anticoagulant properties of statins reported in experimental and clinical studies involve decreased tissue factor ex- Keywords pression resulting in reduced thrombin generation and attenuation of Blood coagulation, statins, tissue factor, thrombin, venous throm- pro-coagulant reactions catalysed by thrombin, such as fibrinogen boembolism Correspondence to: Received: August 30, 2013 Anetta Undas, MD, PhD Accepted after major revision: October 15, 2013 Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University School of Medicine Prepublished online: November 28, 2013 80 Pradnicka St., 31–202 Krakow, Poland doi:10.1160/TH13-08-0720 Tel.: +48 12 6143004, Fax: +48 12 4233900 Thromb Haemost 2014; 111: ■■■ E-mail: [email protected] Introduction Most of these additional statin-mediated actions reported are independent of blood cholesterol reduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Antiplatelets, Anticoagulants and Bleeding Risk and Ppis
    GP INFOSHEET – ANTITHROMBOTICS AND BLEEDING RISK Author(s): Dr. Stuart Rison; Dr. John Robson; Version: 1.6; Last updated 28/11/2019 ANTIPLATELETS, ANTICOAGULANTS AND BLEEDING RISK – WHICH AGENTS AND FOR HOW LONG?; WHY USE PPIs? KEY RECOMMENDATION Patients taking anticoagulants or antiplatelet medicines at high bleed risk should be considered for a Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI). PPIs reduce bleeding risk by 70% or more. Patients age 65 years or more on anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents are at increased risk because of their age and bleeding risk continues to rise exponentially at older ages. PPIs are recommended in patients on anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents: o At any age with previous GI bleeding o Age 75 years or older o 65 years or older with additional risk factors (see box below) o Interacting medication Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for cardiac conditions - typically aspirin + clopidogrel - is rarely justified for more than 1 year. Review use for more than one 1 year and in conjunction with the cardiologist consider whether this can revert to a single agent. Dual-pathway therapy for atrial fibrillation - both an anticoagulant and one or more antiplatelet agents- is also rarely justified for longer than 1 year. Consider anticoagulant alone with appropriate specialist advice. ADDITIONAL GI-BLEED RISK FACTORS Anaemia Hb <11g/L Impaired renal function (eGFR<30) Upper GI inflammation (and of course previous GI bleeding) Liver disease Interacting medicines (NSAIDs, SSRI/SNRIs, bisphosphonates, lithium, spironolactone, phenytoin, carbamazepine) WHAT DO WE MEAN BY ANTITHROMBOTICS? Antithrombotics reduce blood clot formation1. There are two main categories: 1. Antiplatelet agent – inhibit platelet aggregation e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Status of Antifibrinolytics in Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Elective Deep Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest Jeffrey A
    Anesthesiology Clin N Am 21 (2003) 527–551 Current status of antifibrinolytics in cardiopulmonary bypass and elective deep hypothermic circulatory arrest Jeffrey A. Green, MD*, Bruce D. Spiess, MD Department of Anesthesiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Medical College of Virginia Campus, 1200 East Broad Street, PO Box 980695, Richmond, VA 23209 USA Bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) alters the hemostatic balance and predisposes cardiac surgery patients to an increased risk of microvascular bleeding. Bleeding and the need for transfusion are among the most common complications of cardiac surgery. In fact, until recently, blood transfusions seemed to be required for about 50% of all cardiac surgery patients [1]. Currently, CPB accounts for 10% to 20% of the transfusions performed in the United States [2,3]. Transfusion, however, exposes patients to added risks such as infectious disease transmission [4], transfusion reactions [5], graft-versus-host disease [6], transfusion-induced lung injury [7], and decreased resistance to postoperative infection [8,9]. Transfusion increases the risk of infection by 35% to 300% and increases the risk of pneumonia in coronary artery bypass (CABG) patients by 5% per unit transfused [10]. The primary purported benefit of transfusion, increased oxygen carrying capacity, has not been definitively proven. Excessive postoperative bleeding may necessitate surgical reexploration, increasing morbidity, and mortality. Postoperatively, the risk of excessive bleeding is 11% [11], and 5% to 7% of patients lose more than 2 L of blood in the first 24 hours after CPB [12]. Reexploration for hemorrhage is required in 3.6% to 4.2% of patients [13], and mortality rates range from 10% to 22% [14].
    [Show full text]
  • Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease, 10Th Ed, 2016
    [ Evidence-Based Medicine ] Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report Clive Kearon, MD, PhD; Elie A. Akl, MD, MPH, PhD; Joseph Ornelas, PhD; Allen Blaivas, DO, FCCP; David Jimenez, MD, PhD, FCCP; Henri Bounameaux, MD; Menno Huisman, MD, PhD; Christopher S. King, MD, FCCP; Timothy A. Morris, MD, FCCP; Namita Sood, MD, FCCP; Scott M. Stevens, MD; Janine R. E. Vintch, MD, FCCP; Philip Wells, MD; Scott C. Woller, MD; and COL Lisa Moores, MD, FCCP BACKGROUND: We update recommendations on 12 topics that were in the 9th edition of these guidelines, and address 3 new topics. METHODS: We generate strong (Grade 1) and weak (Grade 2) recommendations based on high- (Grade A), moderate- (Grade B), and low- (Grade C) quality evidence. RESULTS: For VTE and no cancer, as long-term anticoagulant therapy, we suggest dabigatran (Grade 2B), rivaroxaban (Grade 2B), apixaban (Grade 2B), or edoxaban (Grade 2B) over vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy, and suggest VKA therapy over low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH; Grade 2C). For VTE and cancer, we suggest LMWH over VKA (Grade 2B), dabigatran (Grade 2C), rivaroxaban (Grade 2C), apixaban (Grade 2C), or edoxaban (Grade 2C). We have not changed recommendations for who should stop anticoagulation at 3 months or receive extended therapy. For VTE treated with anticoagulants, we recommend against an inferior vena cava filter (Grade 1B). For DVT, we suggest not using compression stockings routinely to prevent PTS (Grade 2B). For subsegmental pulmonary embolism and no proximal DVT, we suggest clinical surveillance over anticoagulation with a low risk of recurrent VTE (Grade 2C), and anticoagulation over clinical surveillance with a high risk (Grade 2C).
    [Show full text]
  • AHFS Pharmacologic-Therapeutic Classification (2012).Pdf
    AHFS Pharmacologic-Therapeutic Classification 4:00 Antihistamine Drugs 4:04 First Generation Antihistamines 4:04.04 Ethanolamine Derivatives 4:04.08 Ethylenediamine Derivatives 4:04.12 Phenothiazine Derivatives 4:04.16 Piperazine Derivatives 4:04.20 Propylamine Derivatives 4:04.92 Miscellaneous Derivatives 4:08 Second Generation Antihistamines 4:92 Other Antihistamines* 8:00 Anti-infective Agents 8:08 Anthelmintics 8:12 Antibacterials 8:12.02 Aminoglycosides 8:12.06 Cephalosporins 8:12.06.04 First Generation Cephalosporins 8:12.06.08 Second Generation Cephalosporins 8:12.06.12 Third Generation Cephalosporins 8:12.06.16 Fourth Generation Cephalosporins 8:12.07 Miscellaneous -Lactams 8:12.07.04 Carbacephems 8:12.07.08 Carbapenems 8:12.07.12 Cephamycins 8:12.07.16 Monobactams 8:12.08 Chloramphenicol 8:12.12 Macrolides 8:12.12.04 Erythromycins 8:12.12.12 Ketolides 8:12.12.92 Other Macrolides 8:12.16 Penicillins 8:12.16.04 Natural Penicillins 8:12.16.08 Aminopenicillins 8:12.16.12 Penicillinase-resistant Penicillins 8:12.16.16 Extended-spectrum Penicillins 8:12.18 Quinolones 8:12.20 Sulfonamides 8:12.24 Tetracyclines 8:12.24.12 Glycylcyclines 8:12.28 Antibacterials, Miscellaneous 8:12.28.04 Aminocyclitols 8:12.28.08 Bacitracins 8:12.28.12 Cyclic Lipopeptides 8:12.28.16 Glycopeptides 8:12.28.20 Lincomycins 8:12.28.24 Oxazolidinones 8:12.28.28 Polymyxins 8:12.28.30 Rifamycins 8:12.28.32 Streptogramins 8:12.28.92 Other Miscellaneous Antibacterials* 8:14 Antifungals 8:14.04 Allylamines 8:14.08 Azoles 8:14.16 Echinocandins 8:14.28 Polyenes 8:14.32
    [Show full text]
  • Antithrombotic Therapy in Hypertension: a Cochrane Systematic Review
    Journal of Human Hypertension (2005) 19, 185–196 & 2005 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0950-9240/05 $30.00 www.nature.com/jhh ORIGINAL ARTICLE Antithrombotic therapy in hypertension: a Cochrane Systematic review DC Felmeden and GYH Lip Haemostasis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology Unit, University Department of Medicine, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK Although elevated systemic blood pressure (BP) results on one large trial, ASA taken for 5 years reduced in high intravascular pressure, the main complications myocardial infarction (ARR, 0.5%, NNT 200 for 5 years), of hypertension are related to thrombosis rather than increased major haemorrhage (ARI, 0.7%, NNT 154), and haemorrhage. It therefore seemed plausible that use of did not reduce all cause mortality or cardiovascular antithrombotic therapy may be useful in preventing mortality. In two small trials, warfarin alone or in thrombosis-related complications of elevated BP. The combination with ASA did not reduce stroke or coronary objectives were to conduct a systematic review of the events. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors as well as ticlopi- role of antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulation in dine and clopidogrel have not been sufficiently eval- patients with BP, to address the following hypotheses: uated in patients with elevated BP. To conclude for (i) antiplatelet agents reduce total deaths and/or major primary prevention in patients with elevated BP, anti- thrombotic events when compared to placebo or other platelet therapy with ASA cannot be recommended active treatment; and (ii) oral anticoagulants reduce total since the magnitude of benefit, a reduction in myocar- deaths and/or major thromboembolic events when dial infarction, is negated by a harm of similar magni- compared to placebo or other active treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Antithrombotic Medications in the Presence of Neuraxial Anesthesia
    Guideline: Use of Antithrombotic Medications In The Presence of Neuraxial Anesthesia Use of Antithrombotic Medications In The Presence of Neuraxial Anesthesia Purpose of Guidelines: To establish appropriate administration and timing of antithrombotic medications before, during, and after the use of neuraxial anesthesia to minimize the risk of bleeding. Definitions: Neuraxial Anesthesia = Delivery of anesthetic medication requiring placement of catheters or needles into the epidural or spinal space Antithrombotic Medications = Anticoagulant, antiplatelet, and thrombolytic medications Background1-3: Spinal (or epidural) hematomas are a rare but catastrophic complication of neuraxial anesthesia. The risk of hematoma development is increased in the presence of antithrombotic medication. Patients undergoing neuraxial anesthesia must have the risks of bleeding from neuraxial interventions balanced with the underlying and ongoing risk of thromboembolism necessitating anticoagulation. Recommendations for the management of specific antithrombotics in patients undergoing neuraxial anesthesia are provided in the following Tables: o Table 1. Management of Intravenous and Subcutaneous Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients Undergoing Neuraxial Anesthesia o Table 2. Management of ORAL Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients Undergoing Neuraxial Anesthesia o Table 3. Management of ORAL and Intravenous Antiplatelet and Thrombolytic Therapy in Patients Undergoing Neuraxial Anesthesia Workflow if a Contradicted Medication is Prescribed: Providers will have
    [Show full text]
  • Online Appendix
    The More We Die, The More We Sell? A Simple Test of the Home-Market Effect Online Appendix Arnaud Costinot Dave Donaldson MIT, CEPR, and NBER MIT, CEPR, and NBER Margaret Kyle Heidi Williams Mines ParisTech and CEPR MIT and NBER December 28, 2018 1 Contents A Theoretical Appendix3 A.1 Multinational Enterprises (Section III.1)..........................3 A.2 Log-Linearization (Section III.2)...............................3 A.3 Beyond Perfect Competition (Section III.3).........................6 A.3.1 Monopolistic Competition..............................6 A.3.2 Variable Markups...................................7 A.3.3 Endogenous Innovation...............................8 A.3.4 Price Regulations...................................9 A.4 Bilateral Sales (Section VI.1)................................. 12 B Empirical Appendix 12 B.1 Rich versus Poor Countries................................. 12 B.2 Additional Empirical Results................................ 13 B.3 Benchmarking IMS MIDAS data.............................. 13 B.3.1 Benchmarking to the OECD HealthStat Data................... 13 B.3.2 Benchmarking to the MEPS Data.......................... 14 B.4 ATC to GBD Mapping.................................... 15 2 A Theoretical Appendix A.1 Multinational Enterprises (Section III.1) In this appendix, we illustrate how to incorporate multinational production into our basic envi- ronment. Following Ramondo and Rodríguez-Clare(2013), suppose that each firm headquartered in country i that sells drugs targeting disease n in country j 6= i can choose the country l in which its production takes place. If l = i, then the firm exports, if l = j, it engages in horizontal FDI, and if l 6= i, j, it engages in platform FDI. Like in Ramondo and Rodríguez-Clare(2013), we assume that firm-level production functions exhibit constant returns to scale, but we further allow for external economies of scale at the level of the headquarter country for each disease.
    [Show full text]
  • GUIDELINE for ANTITHROMBOTIC REVERSAL Table 1
    GUIDELINE for ANTITHROMBOTIC REVERSAL This document is intended as a guideline only and should not replace sound clinical judgment Table 1: Reversal for ANTICOAGULANT therapy ANTITHROMBOTIC REVERSAL AGENT COMMENTS DIRECT THROMBIN Short half-life and discontinuation of DTI are primary means of attenuating bleed – Off-label use of INHIBITORS (DTIs) rFVIIa/PCC: support with crystalloid and blood products to facilitate rapid renal clearance of drug – REQUIRES ATTENDING IV: 4 Factor PCC APPROVAL – Argatroban Dose*: 50 units/kg (dose cap at 100 kg to mitigate thrombotic risk) – Document attending – Bivalirudin Administration: Place in empty IV bag and give slow IV push over 10 minutes name in the order (Angiomax®) • Use within 4 hours of reconstitution comments Half-life 10-90 Onset: <30 minutes minutes Caution: thrombotic risk Additional options: PO: – If dabigatran ingested – Dabigatran within 1 hour, consider (Pradaxa®) rFVIIa activated charcoal. Dose*: 100 mcg/kg (dose cap at 100 kg to mitigate thrombotic risk) Half-life 12-17 – Mechanical methods, • May repeat in 2 hours if continued bleeding hours in normal such as dialysis, may be Administration: IV bolus over 3-5 minutes renal function considered as a last • Use within 3 hours of reconstitution resort The aPTT is currently Onset: <30 minutes Caution: thrombotic risk the only readily Recommend not giving available lab test to rFVIIa and PCC together QUALITATIVELY due to high risk of measure dabigatran. thrombosis unless clinical Do not use PT/INR situation warrants FACTOR XA 4 Factor
    [Show full text]
  • Antiplatelet Agents Vs. Anticoagulation for Stroke & Tia
    ANTIPLATELET AGENTS VS. ANTICOAGULATION FOR STROKE & TIA David Lee Gordon, M.D., FAAN, FANA, FAHA Professor and Chair Department of Neurology The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center OU Neurology ANTIPLATELET AGENTS VS. ANTICOAGULATION FOR STROKE & TIA Learning Objectives . Describe the two main ways that blood clots using nonmedical terms . List the 6 ischemic stroke etiologies . Determine the optimal antithrombotic therapy for secondary prevention of ischemic stroke based on ischemic stroke etiology . Relate the rationale for prescribing anticoagulation rather than antiplatelet agents in patients with ischemic stroke of unknown cause OU Neurology THE BLOOD Unique substance that fluctuates between two forms . Liquid –to transport blood cells, oxygen, glucose, other chemistries, etc. within the vascular system . Glue – to seal injured artery or vein & prevent blood loss – Scab & clot (= thrombus) are examples of blood as glue – Glue (scab/clot) forms for 1 of 2 reasons: • Platelets (white clot) – like Velcro – Stick to bumpy surfaces inside arteries – If the inner lining of the artery (endothelium) is normal, platelets do NOT cause thrombus formation • Clotting factors (red clot) – like powdered Jello – Exist in balance with natural blood thinners – Clump when blood is stagnant or when unopposed by natural blood thinners OU Neurology BLOOD‐THINNING THERAPY . Antithrombotic therapy is a general term for all blood‐thinning medications . There are 2 types of antithrombotic therapy – Antiplatelet agents –anti‐Velcro medicines – Anticoagulants –anti‐Jello medicines OU Neurology ISCHEMIC STROKE & TIA PATHOPHYSIOLOGY Ischemia (low blood flow) to focal area of brain . Usually due to thromboembolus (floating blood clot) – Thrombus = blood clot – Embolus = floating plug – Blood clot forms in vascular system (arteries or heart), travels downstream, plugs a brain artery .
    [Show full text]
  • A Specific Antidote for Reversal of Anticoagulation by Direct and Indirect Inhibitors of Coagulation Factor Xa
    ARTICLES A specific antidote for reversal of anticoagulation by direct and indirect inhibitors of coagulation factor Xa Genmin Lu1, Francis R DeGuzman2, Stanley J Hollenbach2, Mark J Karbarz1, Keith Abe2, Gail Lee2, Peng Luan1, Athiwat Hutchaleelaha3, Mayuko Inagaki3, Pamela B Conley1, David R Phillips1 & Uma Sinha1 Inhibitors of coagulation factor Xa (fXa) have emerged as a new class of antithrombotics but lack effective antidotes for patients experiencing serious bleeding. We designed and expressed a modified form of fXa as an antidote for fXa inhibitors. This recombinant protein (r-Antidote, PRT064445) is catalytically inactive and lacks the membrane-binding g-carboxyglutamic acid domain of native fXa but retains the ability of native fXa to bind direct fXa inhibitors as well as low molecular weight heparin– activated antithrombin III (ATIII). r-Antidote dose-dependently reversed the inhibition of fXa by direct fXa inhibitors and corrected the prolongation of ex vivo clotting times by such inhibitors. In rabbits treated with the direct fXa inhibitor rivaroxaban, r-Antidote restored hemostasis in a liver laceration model. The effect of r-Antidote was mediated by reducing plasma anti-fXa activity and the non–protein bound fraction of the fXa inhibitor in plasma. In rats, r-Antidote administration dose-dependently and completely corrected increases in blood loss resulting from ATIII-dependent anticoagulation by enoxaparin or fondaparinux. r-Antidote has the potential to be used as a universal antidote for a broad range of fXa inhibitors. Warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, is widely used as an anticoagulant As direct oral fXa inhibitors such as rivaroxaban and apixaban have for the prevention and treatment of thrombotic diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Benefits and Risks of Antithrombotic Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention
    2019 Scientific Conference Benefits and Risks of Antithrombotic Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Friday 28th June 2019 - 8.30 am - 5.10 pm Donna Camilla Savelli Hotel, Via Garibaldi, 27 - 00153 Rome Increasing the knowledge & understanding of Aspirin Page 2 2019 Scientific Conference Benefits and Risks of Antithrombotic Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Welcome The International Aspirin Foundation welcomes you to our 29th Scientific Conference in Rome. These are busy and exciting times at the International Aspirin will have saved worldwide is incalculable’. Aspirin Foundation as trial results and clinical debate continue to keep aspirin activity high within scientific, The inaugural chair of the Scientific Advisory Board, medical and research communities. Professor Peter Elwood FRCP OBE, worked with Nick from the early days and next week in London we are As a result, our Scientific Advisory Board, chaired by launching a commemorative issue of his book; ‘Aspirin Professor Carlo Patrono MD FESC, have worked hard to yesterday, aspirin today, aspirin tomorrow: a history create a stimulating programme that delves into some of prophylactic aspirin’. The foreward to this book was of the questions we need to answer and helps achieve written by the late Nick Henderson, where he wrote; The Foundation’s aim of facilitating discussion amongst professionals from a variety of disciplines regarding “My hope is that this publication will also encourage aspirin’s potential in modern medicine. medical professionals to remain passionate about this compound and continue to put effort into researching new Delegates will be pleased to know that this meeting has applications for it in medicine.” been independently accredited by The CPD Standards Office.
    [Show full text]