DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Public Land Orders, 1942–1950

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Public Land Orders, 1942–1950 Table of Public Land Orders, 1942±1950 EDITORIAL NOTE: In the following table, PLO means Public Land Order and EO means Executive order. PLO No. Signature Date Subject Heading FR Citation 1 June 20, 1942 California; withdrawing public lands for use of the War Department 7 FR 4866 for campsite and maneuver purposes. 2 June 22, 1942 Arizona; withdrawing land for use in connection with the San Carlos 7 FR 4805 Indian Irrigation Project. 3 June 23, 1942 California; withdrawing lands for use as sources of sand, water, 7 FR 4866±7 etc., supply for Sierra Ordnance Depot. Amended by PLO No. 611 (14 FR 6334). 4 June 25, 1942 Florida; withdrawing lands for use as aerial gunnery range, War De- 7 FR 4934 partment. 5 June 26, 1942 Alaska; withdrawing public lands for military purposes.1 Revoked by 11 FR 8362± PLO No. 6982 (58 FR 32857, June 14, 1993).. 8370 6 June 26, 1942 Nevada; withdrawing public lands for War Department air base ....... 7 FR 5281 7 June 29, 1942 New Mexico; withdrawing public lands for War Department air base. 7 FR 5281 Modified by PLO No. 473 (13 FR 2542), as amended; and re- voked by PLO No. 833 (17 FR 4822). 8 June 30, 1942 Arizona; withdrawing public lands for national defense purposes. 7 FR 5281 Revoked by PLO No. 200 (9 FR 695±6). 9 July 3, 1942 ... New Mexico; withdrawing lands for War Department practice bomb- 7 FR 5449 ing range. Revoked by PLO No. 387 (12 FR 5461). 10 July 8, 1942 ... South Dakota; withdrawing public lands for War Department ord- 7 FR 5449 nance depot. Amended by PLO No. 674 (15 FR 6787). 11 July 8, 1942 ... Oregon; withdrawing public lands for use of War Department camp- 7 FR 5575 site. Revoked by PLO No. 467 (13 FR 2222). 12 July 20, 1942 Alaska; withdrawing public lands pending definite location and con- 7 FR 5917 struction of Canadian-Alaskan military highway. 13 July 21, 1942 Colorado; withdrawing public lands for military purposes. Modified 7 FR 5917 by PLO Nos. 418 (12 FR 6926) and 631 (15 FR 326) and re- voked by PLO No. 2746 (27 FR 8119). 14 July 21, 1942 California; withdrawing public lands for Naval supply depot .............. 7 FR 5917 15 July 21, 1942 Utah; withdrawing lands as ammunition storage depot for Chemical 7 FR 5917±8 Warfare Service. Amended by PLO Nos. 452 (13 FR 1265) and 705 (16 FR 2441). 16 July 21, 1942 Arizona; withdrawing lands for War Department field artillery range 7 FR 5918 17 July 21, 1942 Alaska; air navigation site withdrawal No. 179. Amended by PLO 12 FR 494 No. 394 (12 FR 5731) and revoked by PLO No. 5553 (40 FR 58144). 18 July 29, 1942 New Mexico; withdrawing public land for use of War Department 7 FR 6230 practice bombing range. 19 Aug. 4, 1942 .. Alaska; enlarging Air Navigation Site withdrawal No. 149. Amended 12 FR 494 by PLO No. 394 (12 FR 5731). 20 Aug. 4, 1942 .. Alaska; withdrawing public lands for use of the War Department for 11 FR 8362± military purposes.1 Revoked by PLO No. 1802 (24 FR 1464). 8370 21 Aug. 6, 1942 .. New Mexico; withdrawing public lands for practice bombing range 7 FR 6376 for War Department. Revoked by PLO No. 389 (12 FR 5463). 22 Aug. 6, 1942 .. Arizona; withdrawing public lands for bombing range, War Depart- 7 FR 6376 ment. Revoked by PLO No. 528 (13 FR 6977, 7432). 23 Aug. 7, 1942 .. Washington; withdrawing for Swift Creek Administrative site, in con- 7 FR 6622 nection with Columbia National Forest. Revoked by PLO No. 1322 (21 FR 6385). 24 Aug. 11, 1942 Wyoming; withdrawing for military purposes. Revoked by PLO No. 7 FR 6500 600 (14 FR 4949). 25 Aug. 12, 1942 California; withdrawing public lands for defense training school for 7 FR 6607 aircraft pilots. Revoked by PLO No. 600 (14 FR 4949). 26 Aug. 12, 1942 California; withdrawing public lands for War Department campsite. 7 FR 6690±1 Amended by PLO No. 1709 (23 FR 6182). 27 Aug. 12, 1942 Nevada; withdrawing for military purposes ......................................... 7 FR 6691 28 Aug. 12, 1942 California; withdrawing for military purposes. Revoked by PLO No. 7 FR 6691 2043 (25 FR 409). PLO No. Signature Date Subject Heading FR Citation 29 Aug. 14, 1942 Idaho; revoking in part EO No. 4796 of Jan. 19, 1928, and air navi- 7 FR 6691 gation site withdrawal No. 106. 30 Aug. 14, 1942 Florida; withdrawing lands for Navy Department. Revoked by PLO 7 FR 7182 No. 6214 (47 FR 11668). 31 Aug. 14, 1942 California; withdrawing public lands for War Department air base. 7 FR 6691 Revoked by PLO No. 456 (13 FR 1345). 32 Aug. 18, 1942 Alaska; withdrawing public lands in aid of construction of Trans-Ca- 7 FR 6780 nadian Alaskan Railway. Revoked by PLO No. 361 (12 FR 2169). 33 Aug. 20, 1942 Utah; withdrawing public lands for prosecution of the war. Revoked 7 FR 6907±8 by PLO No. 320 (11 FR 7137). 34 Aug. 25, 1942 Alaska; withdrawing public lands for military purposes. Revoked by 7 FR 7039± PLO No. 354 (12 FR 1445). 40 35 Aug. 27, 1942 Idaho, Utah and Wyoming; withdrawing public lands for military pur- 7 FR 7040 poses. 36 Sept. 7, 1942 Alaska; withdrawing public lands for military purposes.1 Revoked by 11 FR 8362± PLO No. 1251 (20 FR 8537). 8370 37 Sept. 7, 1942 Wisconsin; withdrawing public lands for military purposes. Amended 7 FR 7295 by PLO No. 504 (13 FR 4481). 38 Sept. 8, 1942 Washington; withdrawing for Navy Department aviation purposes. 7 FR 7295 Revoked by PLO No. 455 (13 FR 1344). 39 Sept. 22, 1942 Arizona; withdrawing public lands for War Department bombing 7 FR 7458 range. Revoked by PLO No. 476 (13 FR 2586). 40 Sept. 11, 1942 California; withdrawing for War Department aviation purposes. Re- 7 FR 7576 voked by PLO No. 1538 (22 FR 8875). 41 Sept. 18, 1942 California; withdrawing for Navy Department aviation purposes. Re- 7 FR 7698 voked by PLO No. 1931 (24 FR 6582). 42 Sept. 18, 1942 California; air navigation site withdrawal No. 187. Amended by PLO 7 FR 8000 No. 394 (12 FR 5731). 43 Sept. 29, 1942 California; withdrawing for use of War Department for air base ........ 7 FR 8293 44 Sept. 30, 1942 Arizona; withdrawing for Army aircraft pilots training school. Re- 7 FR 8293 voked by PLO No. 6474 (48 FR 45401). 45 Sept. 30, 1942 Oregon and Washington; withdrawing public lands for the Bonne- 7 FR 8438 ville Project. 46 Oct. 8, 1942 ... Alaska; withdrawing for classification and in aid of legislation. Re- 7 FR 8619 voked by PLO No. 1284 (21 FR 2413). 47 Oct. 12, 1942 Alaska; withdrawing public lands for military purposes1 .................... 11 FR 8362± 8370 48 Oct. 12, 1942 Alaska; withdrawing public lands for military purposes.1 Revoked by 11 FR 8362± PLO No. 528 (13 FR 6977, 7432). 8370 49 Oct. 30, 1942 New Mexico; withdrawing public lands in connection with training of 7 FR 9747 officers for immigration border patrol. Revoked by PLO No. 5920 (46 FR 28410). 50 Nov. 3, 1942 .. Nevada; withdrawing for military purposes. Revoked by PLO No. 7 FR 9439 627 (15 FR 337), as amended. 51 Nov. 3, 1942 .. Arizona; withdrawing public lands in connection with operation of 7 FR 9747±8 school for training Army aircraft pilots. 52 Nov. 3, 1942 .. New Mexico; withdrawing for military bombing range. Revoked by 7 FR 9748 PLO No. 111. (8 FR 5345). 53 Nov. 4, 1942 .. Nevada, withdrawing for military bombing range. Revoked by PLO No. 153. (8 FR 10942±3)7 FR 9748. 54 Nov. 5, 1942 .. Arizona; withdrawing for military bombing range ................................ 7 FR 9748 55 Nov. 5, 1942 .. New Mexico; withdrawing for military bombing range. Revoked by 7 FR 9749 PLO No. 450 (13 FR 1236). 56 Nov. 6, 1942 .. Arizona; withdrawing for aerial gunnery and bombing range ............. 7 FR 9497 57 Nov. 12, 1942 Utah; withdrawing for War Department ordnance storage depot. 7 FR 9749 Amended by PLO No. 867 (17 FR 9603). 58 Nov. 12, 1942 Nevada; withdrawing for military purposes ......................................... 7 FR 9749 59 Nov. 12, 1942 Arizona; withdrawing for military purposes. Amended by PLO No. 7 FR 9749± 661 (15 FR 5912). 50 60 Nov. 13, 1942 New Mexico; withdrawing for War Department auxiliary landing 7 FR 9750 fields. 61 Nov. 18, 1942 Colorado; reserving minerals in Arapaho National Forest for war 7 FR 9984 purposes. Revoked by PLO No. 2547 (26 FR 11803). 62 Nov. 18, 1942 Utah; withdrawing for military purposes .............................................. 7 FR 9984 PLO No. Signature Date Subject Heading FR Citation 63 Nov. 18, 1942 New Mexico; withdrawing public lands for War Department as prac- 7 FR 9984±5 tice bombing range. Revoked by PLO No. 483 (13 FR 3255). 64 Nov. 19, 1942 Arizona; withdrawing for War Department as auxiliary landing fields 7 FR 9985 65 Nov. 30, 1942 California; amending EO No. 5827 of March 28, 1932, withdrawing 7 FR 10401 public lands for use of War Department. 66 Nov. 30, 1942 Utah; withdrawing for War Department as an ordnance storage 7 FR 10401 depot. Amended by PLO Nos. 452 (13 FR 1265) and 705 (16 FR 2441). 67 Dec. 1, 1942 .. New Mexico; reserving minerals belonging to the U.S. for use for 7 FR 10402 military purposes. 68 Dec. 8, 1942 .. Alaska; withdrawing for military purposes.1 Revoked by PLO No. 11 FR 8362± 507 (13 FR 4572).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forest Songbird Abundance and Viability at Multiple Scales on the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 1999 Forest songbird abundance and viability at multiple scales on the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia Thomas Eugene DeMeo West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation DeMeo, Thomas Eugene, "Forest songbird abundance and viability at multiple scales on the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia" (1999). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 1045. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/1045 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FOREST SONGBIRD ABUNDANCE AND VIABILITY AT MULTIPLE SCALES ON THE MONONGAHELA NATIONAL FOREST, WEST VIRGINIA Thomas Eugene DeMeo Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the College of Agriculture and Forestry West Virginia University In Partial
    [Show full text]
  • Land Areas of the National Forest System, As of September 30, 2019
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the National Forest System As of September 30, 2019 Forest Service WO Lands FS-383 November 2019 Metric Equivalents When you know: Multiply by: To fnd: Inches (in) 2.54 Centimeters Feet (ft) 0.305 Meters Miles (mi) 1.609 Kilometers Acres (ac) 0.405 Hectares Square feet (ft2) 0.0929 Square meters Yards (yd) 0.914 Meters Square miles (mi2) 2.59 Square kilometers Pounds (lb) 0.454 Kilograms United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Areas of the WO, Lands National Forest FS-383 System November 2019 As of September 30, 2019 Published by: USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20250-0003 Website: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar-index.shtml Cover Photo: Mt. Hood, Mt. Hood National Forest, Oregon Courtesy of: Susan Ruzicka USDA Forest Service WO Lands and Realty Management Statistics are current as of: 10/17/2019 The National Forest System (NFS) is comprised of: 154 National Forests 58 Purchase Units 20 National Grasslands 7 Land Utilization Projects 17 Research and Experimental Areas 28 Other Areas NFS lands are found in 43 States as well as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. TOTAL NFS ACRES = 192,994,068 NFS lands are organized into: 9 Forest Service Regions 112 Administrative Forest or Forest-level units 503 Ranger District or District-level units The Forest Service administers 149 Wild and Scenic Rivers in 23 States and 456 National Wilderness Areas in 39 States. The Forest Service also administers several other types of nationally designated
    [Show full text]
  • Fishlake National Forest
    FISHLAKE NATIONAL FOREST RESPONSE TO COMMENTS for the FISHLAKE OHV ROUTE DESIGNATION PROJECT 12 October 2006 INTRODUCTION The forest incorporated existing comments from prior public participation processes during the pre- NEPA (NFMA) assessment. The following documents from these efforts are incorporated by reference: Public comments received for the 2001 OHV Event Environmental Assessment for the Rocky Mountain and Fillmore Jamborees. The assessment covered all of the Fishlake and portions of the Dixie and Manti-LaSal National Forests as well as Richfield BLM. OHV and travel management comments received by mail or at public meetings for Forest Plan revision efforts. Meeting notes and final presentations and reports from the Forest Plan revision Topical Working Groups (TWiGs) for OHVs, dispersed camping, and undeveloped area suitability. These records are included in the OHV project file and are incorporated by reference. The Notice of Intent (NOI) for the Fishlake OHV Route Designation Project was published in the Federal Register on June 7, 2004. The NOI included a proposed action (Alternative 2) that designated routes and areas open to motorized use on the Fishlake National Forest. The effect of these designations is to close the forest to unrestricted motorized cross-country travel. The NOI asked for comments on the proposed action by July 30, 2004. Immediately prior to release of the NOI, the Forest Service briefed local governmental officials, motorized advocacy groups, businesses, and environmental groups. The project web site http://www.fs.fed.us/r4/fishlake/projects/ohv.shtml, press release, and postings at some trailheads were used to disseminate information and gather comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Interior Columbia Basin Mollusk Species of Special Concern
    Deixis l-4 consultants INTERIOR COLUMl3lA BASIN MOLLUSK SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN cryptomasfix magnidenfata (Pilsbly, 1940), x7.5 FINAL REPORT Contract #43-OEOO-4-9112 Prepared for: INTERIOR COLUMBIA BASIN ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT PROJECT 112 East Poplar Street Walla Walla, WA 99362 TERRENCE J. FREST EDWARD J. JOHANNES January 15, 1995 2517 NE 65th Street Seattle, WA 98115-7125 ‘(206) 527-6764 INTERIOR COLUMBIA BASIN MOLLUSK SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN Terrence J. Frest & Edward J. Johannes Deixis Consultants 2517 NE 65th Street Seattle, WA 98115-7125 (206) 527-6764 January 15,1995 i Each shell, each crawling insect holds a rank important in the plan of Him who framed This scale of beings; holds a rank, which lost Would break the chain and leave behind a gap Which Nature’s self wcuid rue. -Stiiiingfieet, quoted in Tryon (1882) The fast word in ignorance is the man who says of an animal or plant: “what good is it?” If the land mechanism as a whole is good, then every part is good, whether we understand it or not. if the biota in the course of eons has built something we like but do not understand, then who but a fool would discard seemingly useless parts? To keep every cog and wheel is the first rule of intelligent tinkering. -Aido Leopold Put the information you have uncovered to beneficial use. -Anonymous: fortune cookie from China Garden restaurant, Seattle, WA in this “business first” society that we have developed (and that we maintain), the promulgators and pragmatic apologists who favor a “single crop” approach, to enable a continuous “harvest” from the natural system that we have decimated in the name of profits, jobs, etc., are fairfy easy to find.
    [Show full text]
  • USDA Forest Service Guidelines for Consultants for Identifying, Recording, & Evaluating Archaeological Resources in UTAH April 20, 2020
    USDA Forest Service Guidelines for Consultants for Identifying, Recording, & Evaluating Archaeological Resources in UTAH April 20, 2020 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION & CONTACTS ....................................................................................................................... 2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................................ 4 Policy ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Professional Qualifications ....................................................................................................................... 4 Bids ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 Permits for Archaeological Investigations ................................................................................................ 5 Project Numbers ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Site Numbers ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Discoveries ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Confidentiality ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on the Genus Carex on the Idaho Panhandle National Forests
    STUDIES IN THE GENUS CAREX ON THE IDAHO PANHANDLE NATIONAL FORESTS by Steven L. Caicco Natural Heritage Section Nongame Wildlife/Endangered Species Program Bureau of Wildlife December 1988 Idaho Department of Fish and Game 600 South Walnut Street, P.O. Box 25 Boise, Idaho 83707 Jerry M. Conley, Director Cooperative Challenge Grant Project Idaho Panhandle National Forests Idaho Department of Fish and Game Contract No. 53-0281-7-163 ABSTRACT Eleven of thirteen species of the genus Carex (sedges) which have been designated as Sensitive Species within Region 1 of the U.S. Forest Service are known to occur in Idaho. In this study, the status of these thirteen species, plus one other species of sedge, on the Idaho Panhandle National Forests was investigated through herbaria searches and field surveys. In individual reports, the taxonomy, description, range, habitat, collection record, and conservation status of nine of the fourteen species are discussed. Each species discussion ends with recommendations for land managers and field personnel. The other five species of sedge are more briefly discussed. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT...................................................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................. ii LIST OF APPENDICES............................................ ii INTRODUCTION.................................................. 1 INDIVIDUAL SPECIES REPORTS Carex aenea Fern. ............................................ 2 Carex buxbaumii Wahl. ........................................ 4 Carex californica
    [Show full text]
  • Manti-La Sal Ranger Stations
    United States Department of Agriculture Commodious Cabins & Forest Service Intermountain Region Handsome Structures MANTI-LA SAL NATIONAL FOREST MAY 2013 Administrative Facilities of the Manti-La Sal National Forest, 1905-1962 Historic Context Statement & Evaluations, Forest Service Report No. ML-13-1437 Cover: Ranger David Williams with his family at the Clay Springs Ranger Station, 1908 “A commodious cabin is being built, and other improvements which will be made will make the station a very convenient one.” – “Building New Ranger Station on Wilson Mesa,” Times Independent, November 18, 1920, 1 The new Moab building “is a handsome structure and affords ample space for the supervisor’s office. eventually the forest headquarters will be one of the most attractive locations in town.” – “Forest Service In New Building,” Times Independent, September 12, 1940, 1. Commodious Cabins and Handsome Structures Administrative Facilities of the Manti-La Sal National Forest, 1905-1962 Historic Context Statement and Evaluations Forest Service Report No. ML-13-1437 By Richa Wilson Regional Architectural Historian USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region 324 25th Street Ogden, UT 84401 May 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................................................................. V CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................... 1 SPATIAL BOUNDARIES ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Position Outreach Announcement
    USDA FOREST SERVICE INTERMOUNTAIN REGION, R4 Wildlife Biologist GS-0486-11 Dixie National Forest Fishlake National Forest Uinta/Wasatch Cache National Forest Supervisors Office Supervisors Office Supervisors Office 1789 N Wedgewod Lane 115 E 900 N 857 W South Jordan Parkway Cedar City, UT 84721 Richfield, UT 84701 South Jordan, UT 84095 (435) 865-3700 (435) 896-9233 (801) 999-2103 A vacancy announcement to fill a GS-0486-11 Wildlife Biologist term not to exceed 4 year position will be posted on the USAJOBS web site, http://www.usajobs.gov in the near future. This is a term position opportunity not to exceed one year, with the possibility of extension of up to four years depending on funding and availability of work. At the end of the term, the incumbent will be terminated. This notification is being circulated to inform prospective applicants of this opportunity. If interested please respond no later than September 27th. You may also obtain a copy of the announcement after the position has been advertised by contacting Julie Whicker – Administrative Support Assistant at (435) 865-3716 or e-mail [email protected]. Description of duties… Incumbent is responsible for wildlife program management, policy and planning, inspection and evaluation of wildlife, and conducting and reviewing wildlife surveys and studies. In addition to the above duties the incumbent serves as a key member of the Forest Service Interdisciplinary Team working on three major electrical transmission line projects across Utah National Forests. Position must be able to build relationships with remote Interdisciplinary colleagues within the Forest Service, other agencies, and private sector environmental consultants.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2021 to 09/30/2021 Ashley National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2021 to 09/30/2021 Ashley National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, On Hold N/A N/A Sarah Shoemaker 228, subpart A. Orders 907-586-7886 EIS [email protected] d.us *UPDATED* Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations apply to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the US mining laws. More Information is available at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/science-technology/geology/minerals/locatable-minerals/current-revisions. Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) 07/01/2021 07:16 pm MT Page 1 of 10 Ashley National Forest Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Amendments to Land - Land management planning In Progress: Expected:12/2020 01/2021 John Shivik Management Plans Regarding - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants Objection Period Legal Notice 801-625-5667 Sage-grouse Conservation 08/02/2019 [email protected] EIS Description: The Forest Service is considering amending its land management plans to address new and evolving issues arising since implementing sage-grouse plans in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • USDA Forest Service Youth Conservation Corps Projects 2021
    1 USDA Forest Service Youth Conservation Corps Projects 2021 Alabama Tuskegee, National Forests in Alabama, dates 6/6/2021--8/13/2021, Project Contact: Darrius Truss, [email protected] 404-550-5114 Double Springs, National Forests in Alabama, 6/6/2021--8/13/2021, Project Contact: Shane Hoskins, [email protected] 334-314- 4522 Alaska Juneau, Tongass National Forest / Admiralty Island National Monument, 6/14/2021--8/13/2021 Project Contact: Don MacDougall, [email protected] 907-789-6280 Arizona Douglas, Coronado National Forest, 6/13/2021--7/25/2021, Project Contacts: Doug Ruppel and Brian Stultz, [email protected] and [email protected] 520-388-8438 Prescott, Prescott National Forest, 6/13/2021--7/25/2021, Project Contact: Nina Hubbard, [email protected] 928- 232-0726 Phoenix, Tonto National Forest, 6/7/2021--7/25/2021, Project Contact: Brooke Wheelock, [email protected] 602-225-5257 Arkansas Glenwood, Ouachita National Forest, 6/7/2021--7/30/2021, Project Contact: Bill Jackson, [email protected] 501-701-3570 Mena, Ouachita National Forest, 6/7/2021--7/30/2021, Project Contact: Bill Jackson, [email protected] 501- 701-3570 California Mount Shasta, Shasta Trinity National Forest, 6/28/2021--8/6/2021, Project Contact: Marcus Nova, [email protected] 530-926-9606 Etna, Klamath National Forest, 6/7/2021--7/31/2021, Project Contact: Jeffrey Novak, [email protected] 530-841- 4467 USDA Forest Service Youth Conservation Corps Projects 2021 2 Colorado Grand Junction, Grand Mesa Uncomphagre and Gunnison National Forests, 6/7/2021--8/14/2021 Project Contact: Lacie Jurado, [email protected] 970-817-4053, 2 projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Personal Use Mushroom Harvesting Rules As of November 6, 2012 District Phone Closures Permit Guide Species Limit Season Mt
    Washington State Personal Use Mushroom Harvesting Rules as of November 6, 2012 District Phone Closures Permit Guide Species Limit Season Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest Darrington 360-436-1155 None (4) Free use None All combined 5 gal/yr/house No limit Mount Baker 360-856-5700 Wilderness(4) Free use None All combined 5 gal/yr/house 2 weeks Skykomish 360-677-2414 None (4) None None All combined 1 gal/day&5 gal/yr No limit Snoqualmie 425-888-1421 None (4) Free use None All combined 5 gal/yr/house 2 weeks (8) Wenatchee National Forest Cle Elum 509-852-1100 None (4) None None All but pine (9) 2 gallons No limit Chelan 509-682-4900 Wilderness Free use Paper (12) All but pine (9) 3 gallons 4/15-7/31 Entiat 509-784-1511 &LSR(4,11) Free use Paper (12) All but pine (9) 3 gallons 4/15-7/31 Naches 509-653-1401 None (4) None (9) None All but pine (9) 3 gallons No limit Wenatchee River 509-548-2550 Wilderness(4) None (9) Paper (12) All but pine (2) 3 gallons No limit Olympic National Forest Each species 1 gallon (1,3) Hood Canal 360-765-2200 None (4) None On Web No limit All combined 3 gallons (1) Pacific - Forks 360-374-6522 Each species 1 gallon (1,3) None (4) None On Web No limit Pacific - Quinalt 360-288-2525 All combined 3 gallons (1) Gifford Pinchot National Forest Legislative NVM 360-449-7800 Closed No mushroom collecting, outer NVM same as Cowlitz Valley Cowlitz Valley 360-497-1100 SeeMap(4,5) Free use On Web All combined 3 gallons (2) 10 days Mount Adams 509-395-3400 SeeMap(4,5) Free use On Web All combined 3 gallons (2) per year Okanogan
    [Show full text]
  • Norbeck Wildlife Preserve Landscape Assessment
    Norbeck Wildlife Preserve Landscape Assessment Black Hills National Forest Completed by: Continuing Education in Ecosystem Management Group Module XII June 12 – June 23, 2006 Acknowledgements This assessment would not have been possible without the assistance and patience of numerous individuals. We hope we spelled your name correctly and we are extremely grateful for all your help and assistance. Shelly Deisch – Ecologist, SD Game, Fish and Parks Gerard Baker - Superintendent, Mt. Rushmore National Memorial Bill Hill – Forester, Custer State Park Joe McFarland - Custer County, County Commissioner Ken Davis - Pennington County, County Commissioner Jim Brickley - Mayor Hill City Gary Brundige - Wildlife Biologist, Custer State Park Craig Pugsley - Recreation, Custer State Park Greg Josten – SD State Forestry Coe Foss – SD State Forestry Mike Pflaun, Chief Ranger Mt. Rushmore National Memorial Dan Licht, Reg. WL Biologist, Custer State Park Al Johnson – Owner, Palmer Gulch KOA Dave Ressler - Custer Chamber of Commerce Jim Sellars - Keystone Chamber of Commerce Mike Verchio - Hill City Chamber of Commerce Bob Demerssenan - Rapid City Chamber of Commerce John Forney - SD Tourism Committee Aaron Everett - Black Hills Forest Resource Association Justin Cutler - Recreational Adventures Co. Mike Jacobs – Black Hills Aerial Adventures Mike Dennyson - Developer Brian Brademeyer - Defenders of the Black Hills Sam Clawson - Sierra Club Jeremy Nichols - Biodiversity Conservation Alliance Colin Paterson - The Norbeck Society Nancy Hilding - Audubon
    [Show full text]