DOCSLIB.ORG

3Rd Session of 17Th Lok Sabha WEDNESDAY, 04Th March 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
3Rd Session of 17Th Lok Sabha WEDNESDAY, 04Th March 2020 LOK SABHA Budget Session – 3rd Session of 17th Lok Sabha WEDNESDAY, 04th March 2020 INDEX S.No. Question Question Date Subject Division Page No. Type Nos. 1. Question Starred 04.03.2020 Indian Judicial Service NM 2-5 No.193 2. Question Starred 04.03.2020 Vacancies in various NM 6-7 No.196 courts 3. Question Starred 04.03.2020 Law Reports Coordination 8-9 No.198 4. Question Unstarred 04.03.2020 Legal Services to A2J/LAP 10-12 No.2114 Victims of Acid Attacks 5. Question Unstarred 04.03.2020 SC/ST(Prevention of Justice.II 13-14 No.2123 Atrocities) Act 6. Question Unstarred 04.03.2020 High Court Benches in Appointment 15-16 No.2136 Odisha Division 7. Question Unstarred 04.03.2020 Special Court to try Justice.II 17-20 No.2180 Offences against Women 8. Question Unstarred 04.03.2020 Village Courts JR Desk 21-22 No.2183 9. Question Unstarred 04.03.2020 Setting up of New High Appointment 23-24 No.2201 Court Bench Division 10. Question Unstarred 04.03.2020 Pending Rape Cases Justice.II 25-29 No.2251 in Courts 11. Question Unstarred 04.03.2020 Family Courts Justice.II 30-31 No.2273 ..• GOVERNMENTOF INDIA MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LOKSABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. *193 TO BE ANSWERED ON WEDNESDAY, 04th MARCH, 2020 Indian Judicial Service *193. SHRI RAJMOHAN UNNITHAN: SHRI PINAKI MISRA: Will the Minister of LAW AND JUSTICE be pleased to state: (a) whether the Government has any plan to set up Indian Judicial Service as an All India service to fill the vacancies in the Judiciary and give the representation to marginalized sections of the society; and (b) if so, the details thereof? ANSWER MINISTEROF LAW & JUSTICE, COMMUNICATIONSAND ELECTRONICS & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (SHRI RAVI SHANKAR PRASAD) (a) to (b): A Statement is laid on the Table of the House. • , . STATEMENT REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO PARTS Ca) and (b) of LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. *193 FOR ANSWER ON 04th MARCH, 2020. (a) to (b) : In Government's view, a properly framed All India Judicial Service is important to strengthen overall justice delivery system. This will give an opportunity for induction of suitably qualified fresh legal talent selected through a proper all-India merit selection system as well as address the issue of social inclusion by enabling suitable representation to marginalized and deprived sections of society. A comprehensive proposal was formulatedfor the constitution of an All India Judicial Service (AIJS) and the same was approved by the Committee of Secretaries in November, 2012. Besides attracting some of the best talent in the country, it may also facilitate inclusion of competent persons from marginalized sections and women in the judiciary. The proposal was included as an agenda item in the Conference of Chief Ministers and Chief Justices of the High Courts held in April, 2013 and it was decided that the issue needs further deliberation and consideration. The views of the State Governments and High Courts were sought on the proposal. There was divergence of opinion among the State Governments and among the High Courts on the constitution of All India Judicial Service. While some State Governments and High Courts favoured the proposal, some were not in favour of creation of All India Judicial Service while some others wanted changes in the proposal formulated by the Central Government. The High Courts of Sikkim and Tripura have concurred with the proposal approved by Committee of Secretaries for formation of All India Judicial Service. The High Courts of Allahabad, Chhattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Kerala, Manipur, Meghalaya, Orissa and Uttarakhand have suggested changes in age at induction level, qualifications, training and quota of vacancies to be filled through All India Judicial Service. Rests of the High Courts have not favoured the idea. Most of the High Courts want the administrative control over the Subordinate Judiciary to remain with the respective High Courts. The High Courts of Jharkhand and Rajasthan have indicated that the matter regarding creation of AIJS is under consideration. No response has been received from the High Courts of Calcutta, Jammu & Kashmir and Gauhati. The State Governments of Arunachal Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Meghalaya, Nagaland and Punjab do not favour the formation of AIJS. The State Government of Maharashtra wants the recruitment to be done at Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) level which is not in consonance with the provisions of AIJS included in the Constitution of India. The State Governments of Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Manipur, Orissa and Uttarakhand want changes in the proposal formulated by the Central Government. The State Government of Haryana has stated that the proposal seems to be justified. The State Government of Mizoram supported creation of AIJS on the lines of lAS, IPS and other Central Services. The then State of Jammu and Kashmir has mentioned that provisions of Constitution of India for formation of AIJS incorporated in the Constitution by 42nd Amendment Act, 1976 are not applicable to the State of Jammu and Kashmir. No response has yet been received from rest of the States. The matter regarding creation of a Judicial Service Commission to help the recruitment to the post of district judges and review of selection process of judges / judicial officers at all level was also included in the agenda for the Chief Justices Conference, which was held on 03rd and 04th April, 2015, wherein it was resolved to leave it open to the respective High Courts to evolve appropriate methods within the existing system to fill up the vacancies for appointment of District judges expedltlously. The proposal for constitution of All India Judicial Service with views from the High Courts and State Governments received thereon was included in the agenda for the Joint Conference of Chief Ministers and Chief Justices of the High Courts held on os" April, 2015. However, no progress was made on the subject. The proposal of setting up of an All India Judicial service was again discussed on points of eligibility, age, selection criteria, qualification, reservations etc in a meeting chaired by Minister of Law and Justice on 16th January 2017 in the presence of Minister • of State for Law and Justice, Attorney General of India, Solicitor General of India, Secretaries of Department of Justice, Legal affairs and Legislative Department. In view of the existing divergence of opinion amongst the stakeholders the Government is engaged in a consultative process with the stakeholders to arrive at a common ground. ************ GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. *196 TO BE ANSWERED ON WEDNESDAY, 04th MARCH,2020 Vacancies in various Courts *196.SHRIANUBHAV MOHANTY: Will the Minister of LAW AND JUSTICEbe pleased to state: (a) the status of the vacancies of the non-Judicial officers and staff in various courts in the country; (b) the steps taken by the Government to ensure that the vacancies of the non• judicial officers and staff in various courts in the country are filled on time so that the courts function smoothly and efficiently and are able to dispose of a greater number of cases in shorter period; and (c) whether the Government is considering filling up of these vacancies on contractual basis by candidates who fulfil the prescribed mandatory qualifications and pass the basic tests and if so, the details thereof? ANSWER MINISTEROF LAW & JUSTICE,COMMUNICATIONSAND ELECTRONICS& INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY (SHRIRAVISHANKARPRASAD) (a) to (c): A Statement is laid on the Table of the House. ... STATEMENT REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO PARTS (a) to Ccl of LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. *196 FOR ANSWER ON 04th MARCH, 2020. (a) to (c) : The selection and appointments in subordinate courts falls within the purview of the High Courts concerned and respective State Governments. Information on these vacancies is not maintained in the Union Government. ************ GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LAW & JUSTICE (DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE) LOKSABHA STARRED QUESTION NO.198 TO BE ANSWERED ON WEDNESDAY, THE 4m MARCH, 2020 Law Reports * 198. SHRI JASBm SINGH GILL: Will the Minister of LAW AND JUSTICE be pleased to state: a) whether the Supreme Court and High Courts are regularly publishing law reports; b) if so, the detailsthereof; c) if not, the details of the Courts, out of those mentionedin part (a) above, which are not regularly publishing law reports and the steps taken by the Government to ensure that these reports are publishedregularly; d) whether the Government is planning to involve private publishers to publish law reports and if so,the details thereof; and e) the steps taken by the Government to prevent commercial monopoly being created by fewprivate publishers? ANSWER MINISTER OF LAW AND JUSTICE, COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS & INFORMATION TECHONOLOGY (SHRI RA VI SHANKAR PRASAD) (a) to(e): A Statement is laid on the Table of the House. STATEMENT REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO PARTS (a) to (e~ OF LOK SABRA STARRED QUESTION NO.*198 FOR ANSWER ON 4T MARCH,,· 2020. (a) to (e): Publication of Law Reports is a matter which falls within the purview of the judiciary. Reportable decisions of the Supreme Court are published in Supreme Court Reports (SCR). SCR is the official journal of reportable Supreme Court decisions, which is published under the authority of the Supreme Court of India. In respect of High Courts, as per information received, while some are publishing Law Reports like the High Courts of Madhya Pradesh, Punjab & Haryana, Orissa, Karnataka, Kerala, Sikkim, Madras, Rajasthan and Calcutta certain High Courts like Uttarakhand, Manipur, Patna, Andhra Pradesh, Jharkhand, Gujarat, Gauhati and Telangana are not publishing any Law Report. *** \ ' GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE '.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parliament of India R a J Y a S a B H a Committees
    Com. Co-ord. Sec. PARLIAMENT OF INDIA R A J Y A S A B H A COMMITTEES OF RAJYA SABHA AND OTHER PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEES AND BODIES ON WHICH RAJYA SABHA IS REPRESENTED (Corrected upto 4th September, 2020) RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI (4th September, 2020) Website: http://www.rajyasabha.nic.in E-mail: [email protected] OFFICERS OF RAJYA SABHA CHAIRMAN Shri M. Venkaiah Naidu SECRETARY-GENERAL Shri Desh Deepak Verma PREFACE The publication aims at providing information on Members of Rajya Sabha serving on various Committees of Rajya Sabha, Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committees, Joint Committees and other Bodies as on 30th June, 2020. The names of Chairmen of the various Standing Committees and Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committees along with their local residential addresses and telephone numbers have also been shown at the beginning of the publication. The names of Members of the Lok Sabha serving on the Joint Committees on which Rajya Sabha is represented have also been included under the respective Committees for information. Change of nominations/elections of Members of Rajya Sabha in various Parliamentary Committees/Statutory Bodies is an ongoing process. As such, some information contained in the publication may undergo change by the time this is brought out. When new nominations/elections of Members to Committees/Statutory Bodies are made or changes in these take place, the same get updated in the Rajya Sabha website. The main purpose of this publication, however, is to serve as a primary source of information on Members representing various Committees and other Bodies on which Rajya Sabha is represented upto a particular period.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Users\ACCER\Desktop\QUESTION LIST 2021\Final Starred Q List
    LOK SABHA ______ List of Questions for ORAL ANSWERS Thursday, March 25, 2021/Chaitra 4, 1943 (Saka) ______ (Ministries of Civil Aviation; Housing and Urban Affairs; Jal Shakti; Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises; Minority Affairs; New and Renewable Energy; Ports, Shipping and Waterways; Power; Road Transport and Highways; Youth Affairs and Sports) (®ÖÖÝÖ¸ü ×¾Ö´ÖÖ®Ö®Ö; †Ö¾ÖÖÃÖ®Ö †Öî¸ü ¿ÖÆü¸üß ÛúÖµÖÔ; •Ö»Ö ¿Ö׌ŸÖ; ÃÖæõ´Ö, »Ö‘Öã †Öî¸ü ´Ö¬µÖ´Ö ˆª´Ö; †»¯ÖÃÖÓܵÖÛú ÛúÖµÖÔ; ®Ö¾Öß®Ö †Öî¸ü ®Ö¾ÖßÛú¸üÞÖßµÖ ‰ú•ÖÖÔ; ¯Ö¢Ö®Ö, ¯ÖÖêŸÖ ¯Ö׸ü¾ÖÆü®Ö †Öî¸ü •Ö»Ö´ÖÖÝÖÔ; ×¾ÖªãŸÖ; ÃÖ›ÍÛú ¯Ö׸ü¾ÖÆü®Ö †Öî¸ü ¸üÖ•Ö´ÖÖÝÖÔ; µÖã¾ÖÖ ÛúÖµÖÔÛÎú´Ö †Öî¸ü ÜÖê»Ö ´ÖÓ¡ÖÖ»ÖµÖ) ______ Total Number of Questions — 20 Green Tax on Older Vehicles Aadhaar Authentication Based Contactless Services *421. DR. JAYANTA KUMAR ROY: *423. SHRI BIDYUT BARAN MAHATO: SHRI BHOLA SINGH: SHRI SANJAY SADASHIVRAO MANDLIK: Will the Minister of ROAD TRANSPORT AND Will the Minister of ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS HIGHWAYS ÃÖ›ÍüÛú ¯Ö׸ü¾ÖÆü®Ö †Öî¸ü ¸üÖ•Ö´ÖÖÝÖÔ ´ÖÓ¡Öß ÃÖ›ÍüÛú ¯Ö׸ü¾ÖÆü®Ö †Öî¸ü ¸üÖ•Ö´ÖÖÝÖÔ ´ÖÓ¡Öß be pleased to state: be pleased to state: (a) whether his Ministry has launched Aadhaar (a) whether the Government proposes to impose authentication based contactless services for road users green tax on older vehicles to curb air pollution in the in the country recently and if so, the details thereof; country and if so, the details thereof; (b) the salient features along with the aims and (b) the details of estimated number of older vehicles objectives of the same; plying on roads in the country,
    [Show full text]
  • List of Members Who Raised Matters During Zero Hour (2 December 2019) Sl. No. Name of Member Andparty BALLOT Sl. No. out of Ba
    List of Members who raised matters during Zero Hour (2 December 2019) Sl. No. Name of Member andParty Sl. No. Out of Ballot BALLOT 1. Shri Ram Shiromani, BSP 1. Shri N. Uttam Kumar Reddy, INC 2. Shri Arjunlal Meena, BJP 2. Shri T.R. Baalu, DMK 3. Shri K. Raghu Ramkrishna Raju, YSRCP 3. Prof. Saugata Roy, AITC 4. Shri Rebati Tripura, BJP 4. Shri Bandi Sanjay Kumar, BJP 5. Prof. Ram Shankar Katheria, BJP 5. Shri Pinaki Mishra, BJD 6. Shri Tirath Singh Rawat, BJP 6. Smt. Supriya Sule, NCP 7. Shri Saptagiri Sankar Ulaka, INC 7. Smt. Anupriya Patel, AD 8. Shri Manish Tewari, INC 8. Ms. S. Jothimani, INC 9. Smt. Kavitha Malothu, TRS 9. Shri Vinayak Raut, SS 10. Shri Dulal Chandra Goswami, JD(U) 10. Smt. V. Geethaviswanath, YSRCP 11. Shri Tapir Gao, BJP 11. Kunwar Danish Ali, BSP 12. Dr. V. Kalanidhi, DMK 12. Smt. Locket Chatterjee, BJP 13. Shri Hemant Patil, SS 13. Shri K. Ram Mohan Naidu, TDP 14. Shri Abdul Khaleque, INC 14. Shri Anumula Revanth Reddy, INC 15. Shri Rahul Kaswan, BJP 15. Smt. Jaskaur Meena, BJP 16. Dr. Shashi Tharoor, INC 16. Smt. Kavitha Malothu, TRS 17. Smt. Meenakashi Lekhi, BJP 17. Smt. Pramila Bisoyi, BJD 18. Shri Ramesh Bidhuri, BJP 18. Shri Nama Nageswara Rao, TRS 19. Shri Uday Pratap Singh, BJP 20. Shri Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury, INC 21. Shri Bhartruhari Mahtab, BJD 22. Shri Arvind Sawant, SS 23. Smt. Rajashree Mallick, BJD 24. Shri Virendra Singh, BJP 25. Shri Hasnain Masoodi, JKNC 26. Shri Jual Oram, BJP 27.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday, February 5, 2020 / Magha 16, 1941 (Saka) ______
    LOK SABHA ___ SYNOPSIS OF DEBATES (Proceedings other than Questions & Answers) ______ Wednesday, February 5, 2020 / Magha 16, 1941 (Saka) ______ STATEMENT BY THE PRIME MINISTER THE PRIME MINISTER (SHRI NARENDRA MODI): Today, I have specially come before all of you to share information pertaining to a very important and historic subject. This subject is as close to the heart of crores of our fellow countrymen as it is to me. And I feel honoured to speak about this. This subject is connected to Shri Ram Janm Bhoomi and is about construction of a magnificent temple of Bhagwan Shri Ram at his birth place at Ayodhya. On 9th November 2019, I was in Punjab for dedicating the Kartarpur Sahib corridor to the nation on the occasion of the 550th Prakash Parv of Guru Nanakdev ji. It was in this divine environment that I come to know about the historical judgment of Highest Court of the country on the subject of Ram Janm Bhoomi. In this judgement, the Hon'ble Supreme Court decided that the Inner and Outer Courtyard of the disputed land in Ram Janm Bhoomi belongs to Bhagwan Shri Ram Lalla Virajman. The Hon'ble Supreme Court, in their judgment, had also stated that the Central Government and the State Government, in consultation with each other, will allot 5 acres of land to the Sunni Central Waqf Board. Today, I am very happy to share with this august House and the entire country that the Union Cabinet in its meeting held this morning has taken important decisions on this issue, keeping in mind the directions of the Supreme Court.
    [Show full text]
  • LOK SABHA ___ SYNOPSIS of DEBATES (Proceedings Other Than
    LOK SABHA ___ SYNOPSIS OF DEBATES (Proceedings other than Questions & Answers) ______ Tuesday, December 3, 2019 / Agrahayana 12, 1941 (Saka) ______ SUBMISSION BY MEMBERS (i) Re: Reported commutation of death sentence of a prisoner to life imprisonment involved in the assassination of a Chief Minister of Punjab. THE MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS (SHRI AMIT SHAH) responding to the issue raised by an hon. Member, said: You don't go by the media reports. No commutation shall be given. (ii) Re: Need to supply food items under PDS to the tribals of Dadra and Nagar Haveli. THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS (SHRI G. KISHAN REDDY) responding to the issue raised by several Members, said: The issue put forward by the hon. Members shall be taken care of today itself. MATTERS UNDER RULE 377 1. SHRI RAMESHBHAI L. DHADUK laid a statement regarding repair and reconstruction of bridge over river Bhadar on National Highway between Rajkot and Porbandar in Gujarat. 2. SHRI SUMEDHANAND SARASWATI laid a statement regarding need to establish breeding centres for indigenous cow breeds in Sikar Parliamentary Constituency, Rajasthan. 3. DR. (PROF.) KIRIT PREMJIBHAI SOLANKI laid a statement regarding setting up of VC fund for SC. 4. SHRI NITESH GANGA DEB laid a statement regarding granting of GI tag to Sambalpuri Saree. 5. SHRI RAVINDRA KUSHWAHA laid a statement regarding need to run Rajdhani Express/Vande Bharat/Shatabdi train on Delhi-Lucknow- Gorakhpur-Barauni and Lucknow-Gorakhpur-Varanasi Sections. 6. SHRIMATI SHARDA ANIL PATEL laid a statement regarding need to expedite gauge conversion of Bahucharaji to Patan railway line in Gujarat.
    [Show full text]
  • Lok Sabha ___ Synopsis of Debates
    LOK SABHA ___ SYNOPSIS OF DEBATES (Proceedings other than Questions & Answers) ______ Tuesday, February 11, 2020 / Magha 22, 1941 (Saka) ______ MATTERS UNDER RULE 377 1. SHRI RAVI KISHAN laid a statement regarding need to develop Gorakhpur in Uttar Pradesh as a tourist destination and also provide a special package for the purpose. 2. SHRI RAKESH SINGH laid a statement regarding need to introduce NCERT curriculum in all CBSE affiliated schools in the country. 3. DR. (PROF.) KIRIT PREMJIBHAI SOLANKI laid a statement regarding treatment of rare diseases. 4. DR. UMESH G. JADAV laid a statement regarding need to establish an AIIMS like medical institute at ESIC, Kalaburagi in Karnataka. Laid on the Table as directed by Chair. 5. SHRI RAJENDRA AGRAWAL laid a statement regarding need to grant the status of Central University to Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh. 6. SHRI JAGDAMBIKA PAL laid a statement regarding need to ban the organization Popular Front of India. 7. SHRI ASHOK MAHADEORAO NETE laid a statement regarding need to construct barrage on Wainganga river and dams on its tributaries in Gadchiroli district, Maharashtra. 8. DR. VIRENDRA KUMAR laid a statement regarding need to rejuvenate the temples of archeological importance in Achatt village in Chhattarpur Parliamentary constituency, Madhya Pradesh. 9. SHRI BASANTA KUMAR PANDA laid a statement regarding need to restore the rights of scheduled tribes on forest land. 10. DR. SANJAY JAISWAL laid a statement regarding need to provide a rapid diagnostic kit for detection of Corona virus in suspected patients in the country and impose immediate temporary ban on import of sea-food and meat from China.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventeenth Series, Vol. I, First Session, 2019/1941 (Saka) No
    17.06.2019 1 C O N T E N T S Seventeenth Series, Vol. I, First Session, 2019/1941 (Saka) No. 1, Monday, June 17, 2019 /Jyaistha 27, 1941 (Saka) S U B J E C T P A G E S OFFICERS OF LOK SABHA 2 COUNCIL OF MINISTERS 3-10 NATIONAL ANTHEM 12 OBSERVANCE OF SILENCE 12 ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE SPEAKER PROTEM (i) Welcome to Members of 17th Lok Sabha 13 (ii) Making and subscribing an oath or affirmation 31 LIST OF MEMBERS ELECTED TO LOK SABHA 14-29 NOMINATIONS TO PANEL OF CHAIRPERSONS 30 MEMBERS SWORN 32-59 17.06.2019 2 OFFICERS OF LOK SABHA THE SPEAKER Shri Om Birla PANEL OF CHAIRPERSONS** Shri Kodikunnil Suresh Shri Brijbhushan Sharan Singh Shri Bhartruhari Mahtab SECRETARY GENERAL Shrimati Snehlata Shrivastava Elected on 19.06.2019. ** Nominated on 07.06.2019. The following two separate orders were issued by the President of India on 07.06.2019. 1. Whereas the office of the Speaker will become vacant immediately before the commencement of the first meeting of the House of the People on June 17, 2019 and the office of the Deputy Speaker is also vacant. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred upon me by clause (1) of article 95 of the Constitution of India, I hereby appoint Dr. Virendra Kumar, a Member of the House of the People, to perform the duties of the office of the Speaker from the commencement of the sitting of the House of People on June 17, 2019 till election of the Speaker by the said House.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of India Ministry of Food Processing Industries Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 4846 Answered on 23Rd July, 2019
    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRIES LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 4846 ANSWERED ON 23RD JULY, 2019 FOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRIES 4846. SHRI NITESH GANGA DEB: SHRI SAPTAGIRI SANKAR ULAKA: Will the Minister of FOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRIES be pleased to state: (a) whether the Government has any plan/proposal to set up food parks in the country to create modern infrastructure for food processing especially during the current year and if so, the details thereof, State-wise; (b) the details of parks identified/established/approved over the last five years along with financial assistance or funds provided to such parks and the procedure to select such projects; and (c) whether the Central Government has received any proposal from the State Government of Odisha for setting up/opening up of Food Parks in the State particularly in Barkot block under Deogarh district of the State and if so, the details thereof? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF STATE FOR FOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRIES (SHRI RAMESWAR TELI) (a): No, Sir. Ministry of Food Processing Industries is presently not implementing Food Parks scheme. However, Ministry of Food Processing Industries has been implementing Mega Food Park Scheme (MFPS) to create modern infrastructure for the food processing. Government has sanctioned a total of 42 slots of Mega Food Park Projects in the country. Out of these, Ministry has accorded final approval to 38 Mega Food Park Projects and in- principle approval to 4 Mega Food Park projects. Presently, there is no vacant slot to be filled in. Ministry of Food Processing Industries does not establish Mega Food Parks in the country on its own.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliament of India R a J Y a S a B H a Committees
    Com. Co-ord. Sec. PARLIAMENT OF INDIA R A J Y A S A B H A COMMITTEES OF RAJYA SABHA AND OTHER PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEES AND BODIES ON WHICH RAJYA SABHA IS REPRESENTED (Corrected upto 30th June, 2020) RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI (30th June, 2020) Website: http://www.rajyasabha.nic.in E-mail: [email protected] OFFICERS OF RAJYA SABHA CHAIRMAN Shri M. Venkaiah Naidu SECRETARY-GENERAL Shri Desh Deepak Verma PREFACE The publication aims at providing information on Members of Rajya Sabha serving on various Committees of Rajya Sabha, Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committees, Joint Committees and other Bodies as on 30th June, 2020. The names of Chairmen of the various Standing Committees and Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committees along with their local residential addresses and telephone numbers have also been shown at the beginning of the publication. The names of Members of the Lok Sabha serving on the Joint Committees on which Rajya Sabha is represented have also been included under the respective Committees for information. Change of nominations/elections of Members of Rajya Sabha in various Parliamentary Committees/Statutory Bodies is an ongoing process. As such, some information contained in the publication may undergo change by the time this is brought out. When new nominations/elections of Members to Committees/Statutory Bodies are made or changes in these take place, the same get updated in the Rajya Sabha website. The main purpose of this publication, however, is to serve as a primary source of information on Members representing various Committees and other Bodies on which Rajya Sabha is represented upto a particular period.
    [Show full text]
  • Lok Sabha ___ Synopsis of Debates
    LOK SABHA ___ SYNOPSIS OF DEBATES (Proceedings other than Questions & Answers) ______ Wednesday, September 16, 2020 / Bhadrapada 25, 1942 (Saka) ______ *MATTERS UNDER RULE 377 (1) DR. SUJAY VIKHE PATIL laid a statement regarding need to address concerns of farmers due to proposed land acquisition by Army in Ahmednagar. (2) SHRI AJAY MISRA TENI laid a statement regarding need to streamline the auction process for confiscated goods entering India from Nepal in Uttar Pradesh. (3) SHRI RAVI KISHAN laid a statement regarding need to develop Lalit Narayan Mishra Railway Hospital in Gorakhpur Parliamentary Constituency, Uttar Pradesh into Medical college. * Laid on the Table as directed by the Chair. (4) SHRIMATI RAKSHA NIKHIL KHADSE laid a statement regarding need to scrap the creamy layer system in OBC reservation and also include OBC census in Census-2021. (5) SHRI SUNIL BABURAO MENDHE laid a statement regarding special assistance package for Vidarbha. (6) SHRIMATI APARAJITA SARANGI laid a statement regarding State Business Reform Action Plan 2019 (BRAP). (7) SHRI KRISHNAPALSINGH YADAV laid a statement regarding need to set up a Mega Food Park in Guna Parliamentary Constituency, Madhya Pradesh. (8) SHRI REBATI TRIPURA laid a statement regarding resolution of problems afflicting Tripura Autonomous District Council. (9) SHRI VISHNU DAYAL RAM laid a statement regarding construction of Garhwa-Rehla bypass road in Jharkhand. (10) SHRI G. S. BASAVARAJ laid a statement regarding revision of wages for ASHA workers. (11) SHRI KHAGEN MURMU laid a statement regarding need to take flood control measures in Maldaha Uttar Parliamentary Constituency, West Bengal and provide compensation to the affected people.
    [Show full text]
  • SYNOPSIS of DEBATES (Proceedings Other Than Questions & Answers) ______
    Not for Publication For Members only LOK SABHA ___ SYNOPSIS OF DEBATES (Proceedings other than Questions & Answers) ______ Monday, March 15, 2021 / Phalguna 24, 1942 (Saka) ______ ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER HON. SPEAKER: On my own behalf and on behalf of the hon. Members of the House, I have great pleasure in welcoming His Excellency, Shri Duarte Pacheco, the President of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) who is on a visit to India as our hounoured guest. He arrived in India on Sunday, 14th March, 2021. Today he is seated in the Special Box. Apart from Delhi, he will visit Agra and Goa also before departing from India on Saturday, 20th March 2021. We wish him a happy and fruitful stay in our country. Through His Excellency, we convey our greetings and best wishes to all the hon. members in the IPU, the Government and the great people of Portugal. ________ STATEMENT BY THE MINISTER Re: Recent Developments Pertaining To The Welfare Abroad Of Indians, Non-Resident Indians And Persons Of Indian Origin In The Covid Situation THE MINISTER OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS (DR. SUBRAHMANYAM JAISHANKAR): I rise to apprise this august House of recent developments pertaining to the welfare abroad of Indians, Non-Resident Indians and Persons of Indian Origin in the COVID situation. This is a subject on which many hon. Members have expressed deep interest. We in the Ministry of External Affairs also regularly receive communications relating to individual cases and respond to the best of our ability. Such concern is natural and I take this opportunity, to place before the House a comprehensive picture on the global state of affairs as a result of COVID, its impact on our people and the Government‘s response to the challenges that have emerged.
    [Show full text]
  • IDMA Bulletin 30Th July 2021
    LICENSED TO POST WITHOUT PREPAYMENT LICENCE NO. MR/TECH/WPP-337/WEST/2021-23 RNI REGN. NO. 18921/1970 REGNEGN NOO. MCW/95/2021-23 voL. NO. 52 ISSUE NO. 28 (PagES: 40) 22 TO 30 JULY 2021 ISSN 0970-6054 WEEKLY PUBLICATION Indian APIs & Formulations for Global Healthcare VIDMA (Page No. thanks 4) Dr. Rajeev Singh Raghuvanshi, GSecretary-cum-Scientific (Page No. 8) Director, IPC for Three RMonths (Page No. 24)Extension for Implementation of IP Addendum 2021 (Page No. 7) A (Page No. 26) CDoP (Page extends No. 27) the timeline for Submission of Happlications (Page No. 29) under PLI till 31.08.2021 (Page No. 31) Indian pharma industry to touch USD 130 bn by 2030: Reddy (Page No. 32) IDMA Bulletin LII (28) 22 to 30 July 2021 1 Post Covid: Pharmaceutical Industry has become an alluring career option (Page No. 33) IDMA Bulletin LII (28) 22 to 30 July 2021 2 Founder Editor: Vol. No. 52 Issue No. 28 22 to 30 July 2021 Dr A Patani Editor: IDMA ACTIVITIES: Dr Gopakumar G Nair Virus Attenuation Device (Shycocan Brand) Sponsored by JBCPL ...6 Associate Editors: J L Sipahimalani IDMA GSB team welcoming Shri Manoj Aggarwal, Additional Dr Nagaraj Rao Dr George Patani Chief Secretary, H & FW Dept on July 08, 2021 at Gandhinagar. ......7 National President INDIAN PHARMACOPOEIA: Mahesh H Doshi Immediate Past National President IDMA thanks Dr. Rajeev Singh Raghuvanshi, Secretary-cum- Deepnath Roy Chowdhury Scientific Director, IPC for Three Months Extension for Senior Vice-President Dr Viranchi Shah Implementation of IP Addendum 2021 - reg.
    [Show full text]