Arxiv:2005.14571V2 [Gr-Qc] 5 Aug 2020 ∗∗ Nete Rm,Wieteei Nogigdbt Sto As Work Debate [ Ongoing Can Physical an One Is Is One There Scalar Gravity

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Arxiv:2005.14571V2 [Gr-Qc] 5 Aug 2020 ∗∗ Nete Rm,Wieteei Nogigdbt Sto As Work Debate [ Ongoing Can Physical an One Is Is One There Scalar Gravity Equivalence of inflationary models between the metric and Palatini formulation of scalar-tensor theories 1, 2, 3, Laur J¨arv, ∗ Alexandros Karam, † Aleksander Kozak, ‡ 4, 2, 1, Angelos Lykkas, § Antonio Racioppi, ¶ and Margus Saal ∗∗ 1Institute of Physics, University of Tartu, W. Ostwaldi 1, 50411 Tartu, Estonia 2National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics, R¨avala 10, 10143 Tallinn, Estonia 3Institute of Theoretical Physics University of Wroclaw, pl. Maxa Borna 9, 50-206 Wroclaw, Poland 4Physics Department, University of Ioannina, GR–45110 Ioannina, Greece With a scalar field non-minimally coupled to curvature, the underlying geometry and variational principle of gravity – metric or Palatini – becomes important and makes a difference, as the field dynamics and observational predictions generally depend on this choice. In the present paper we describe a classification principle which encompasses both metric and Palatini models of inflation, employing the fact that inflationary observables can be neatly expressed in terms of certain quantities which remain invariant under conformal transformations and scalar field redefinitions. This allows us to elucidate the specific conditions when a model yields equivalent phenomenology in the metric and Palatini formalisms, and also to outline a method how to systematically construct different models in both formulations that produce the same observables. I. Introduction a frame-invariant approach was developed in [29–31], then fruitfully applied to slow-roll inflation [32–34] and Recent observations of the cosmic microwave back- extended to related theories and formulations [35–39]. ground radiation (CMB) indicate that at large scales The advantage of this method is that, starting from any the Universe is flat and homogeneous. These features scalar-tensor theory, one can define quantities that re- can be explained by postulating a quasi-de Sitter ex- main invariant under the conformal Weyl rescaling of pansion during the very early moments of the Universe. the metric and scalar field reparametrization and then Furthermore, this inflationary era is able to generate express the inflationary observables in terms of these and preserve the primordial inhomogeneities which be- invariants. came the seeds for the subsequent large-scale structure Another issue that arises when one is interested in that we observe. Inflation is usually formulated by sup- non-minimally coupled theories is that of the employed plementing the Einstein-Hilbert action with one or more variational principle. In the metric formalism, the met- real scalar fields whose energy density drives the near- ric is the only dynamical degree of freedom and the exponential expansion. connection is the Levi-Civita. However, in the Pala- Recently, the Planck satellite mission [1] has con- tini or first order formalism [40, 41], the metric and the strained the available parameter space and essentially connection are assumed to be independent variables and excluded many inflationary models. Two of the most one has to vary the action with respect to both of them. popular models, namely Starobinsky [2] and non- Both approaches lead to the same field equation for an minimal Higgs inflation [3–6] still lie in the allowed re- action whose Lagrangian is linear in R and is minimally gion. Incidentally, these theories, even though seem- coupled, but this is no longer true for more general ac- ingly very different, belong to the same equivalence class tions. Regarding inflation, the difference in the predic- arXiv:2005.14571v2 [gr-qc] 5 Aug 2020 which is why they give the same predictions for the ob- tions between the two variational principles has been servables. They also belong to the class of scalar-tensor recently studied in [37, 38, 42–77]. In most of the pre- theories where the inflaton is generally non-minimally vious studies it was shown that the metric and Palatini coupled to gravity but minimally coupled to matter formulations generally give different results when infla- (Jordan frame). Of course, one can always perform a tion is concerned (see however [49, 50]). In this article rescaling of the metric and a scalar field reparametriza- we focus on the cases when the two formalisms can pro- tion and move to the Einstein frame where the scalar duce similar results and extend the classification scheme field is minimally coupled to gravity. One can work of [33] to include Palatini models. in either frame, while there is an ongoing debate as to Future space missions (LITEBIRD [78], PIXIE [79], which one is physical [7–28]. To circumvent the issue, PICO [80]) promise to determine the inflationary ob- servables at high precision that will considerably narrow the range of viable models. However, even when the in- ∗ variant potential can be effectively pinned down, there [email protected] will remain a degeneracy, as many fundamental actions † alexandros.karam@kbfi.ee ‡ [email protected] in different formulations and parametrizations can lead § [email protected] to the same invariant potential and hence to the same ¶ antonio.racioppi@kbfi.ee values for the observables. The aim of the current pa- ∗∗ [email protected] per is to clarify the situation and to outline a method of 2 how to explore and reconstruct such equivalent actions We refer to the set of , , , σ as the model func- in a systematic way. In the end, some actions in a given tions. By considering a{A WeylB V rescaling} of metric (re- equivalence class would be better motivated from the ferred later as a change of frame) and scalar field redef- theoretical point of view, while the degeneracy could inition (referred later as a reparametrization) be also broken by some observations of noninflationary 2¯γ(Φ)¯ physics. gµν =e g¯µν , (4a) The paper is organized as follows. In the next sec- Φ= f¯(Φ)¯ , (4b) tion we adopt the approach of invariants to study gen- eral scalar-tensor theories in both metric and Palatini the action functional (1) preserves its structure (up to formalisms. In section III we focus on inflation and ex- the boundary term) if the functions , , and σ trans- press the slow-roll parameters and inflationary observ- form as [81] A B V ables in terms of the invariant potential and its deriva- ¯ tives. Then, in section IV we determine under which ¯(Φ)=e¯ 2¯γ(Φ) f¯(Φ)¯ , (5a) A A conditions the metric and Palatini formalisms can gen- 2¯γ(Φ)¯ 2 ¯(Φ)=e¯ f¯′ (f¯(Φ))¯ erate the same slow-roll parameters when one starts B B 2¯γ(Φ)¯ 2 from the same action and study some examples. Con- 6 δj Γe (¯γ ′) f¯(Φ)¯ γ¯ ′f¯′ ′ , versely, starting from the same invariant potential in − A − A (5b) section V we explore the reconstruction of the corre- h i ¯ sponding metric and Palatini actions. We summarize ¯(Φ)=e¯ 4¯γ(Φ) f¯(Φ)¯ , (5c) our results and conclude in section VI. Finally, we in- V V σ¯(Φ)¯ = σ f¯(Φ)¯ +¯γ(Φ)¯ , (5d) clude an appendix A where we illustrate how an ad- ditional independent (conformal) transformation of the where prime denotes a derivative with respect to the connection enlarges the general Palatini action, but a scalar field. The Jordan frame is defined by the con- suitable choice neutralizes the effect, a point that has dition σ(Φ) = 0. For what follows we omit the matter not received much attention in the literature so far. part of the action and take m = 0, since our interest is now on the scalar non-minimallyS coupled to gravity which will be identified with the inflaton field. II. Action and invariant quantities By a straightforward calculation it is possible to make sure, that in every spacetime point the numerical value Regardless the gravity formulation, the action for of the quantities [29] general scalar-tensor theory can be written as1 [81], e2σ(Φ) 1 1 m(Φ) = , (6) = d4x √ g (Φ)R (Φ) ( Φ)2 (Φ) I (Φ) S − 2A − 2B ∇ −V A Z (Φ) 2σ(Φ) (Φ) = V 2 , (7) + m[e gµν ,χm] , (1) IV ( (Φ)) S A 2 where we used Planck units MPl = 1 and metric signa- (Φ) 3 ′(Φ) ture ( , +, +, +). The Ricci scalar R = gµν R [Γ, ∂Γ] Φ(Φ) = dΦ B + δj Γ A (8) − µν I s (Φ) 2 (Φ) is a function of the metric tensor gµν and the connection Z A A Γ. The choice of the gravity formulation is reflected on remain invariant, i.e. ¯i(Φ)¯ = i(Φ). In a similar vein, the expression of Γ in eq. (1)[43]: we may introduce anI invariantI metricg ˆ = g , µν A µν λ λ which is unaffected by the conformal transformation Γαβ = αβ + (2) (4a). One can see that the invariant field Φ has a λ λ λ I (1 δj Γ) δα∂βω(Φ) + δβ ∂αω(Φ) gαβ∂ ω(Φ) , different dependence on the model functions when one − − g considers the metric (we use the notation Φ) or Palatini where formalism (denoted as Γ). Still, in bothI formalisms we IΦ ω (Φ) = ln (Φ) , (3) may take the quantity Φ as an invariant description A of the scalar degree of freedomI in the theory [29, 37]. λ p αβ is the Levi-Civita connection, δjk is the Kronecker Negative values for the expression under the square root delta{ } and j = g stands for the metric case while j =Γ in eq. (8) suggest that the scalar field is a ghost, while for the Palatini one. identically constant Φ indicates that the scalar is not dynamical. In the metricI formulation this occurs only 2 ′(Φ) 3 (A ) when (Φ) = 2 (Φ) , while in the Palatini for B − A 1 (Φ) = 0. In both cases the theory is equivalent to The most general Palatini action contains also additional terms B due to the non-metricity of the theory [37].
Recommended publications
  • Arxiv:2108.08491V1 [Hep-Th] 19 Aug 2021
    Prepared for submission to JHEP RESCEU-16/21 Sequestered Inflation Renata Kallosh,a Andrei Linde,a Timm Wrase,b and Yusuke Yamadac aStanford Institute for Theoretical Physics and Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA bDepartment of Physics, Lehigh University, 16 Memorial Drive East, Bethlehem, PA 18018, USA cResearch Center for the Early Universe (RESCEU), Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1 Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: We construct supergravity models allowing to sequester the phenomenology of inflation from the Planckian energy scale physics. The procedure consists of two steps: At Step I we study supergravity models, which might be associated with string theory or M-theory, and have supersymmetric Minkowski vacua with flat directions. At Step II we uplift these flat directions to inflationary plateau potentials. We find certain conditions which ensure that the superheavy fields involved in the stabilization of the Minkowski vacua at Step I are completely decoupled from the inflationary phenomenology. arXiv:2108.08491v2 [hep-th] 30 Aug 2021 Contents 1 Introduction2 2 Single field models3 2.1 Step I 3 2.1.1 Models with canonical K¨ahlerpotential4 2.1.2 General K¨ahlerpotentials5 2.1.3 α-attractors6 3 Two field model8 3.1 Step I 8 3.2 Step II 9 4 Three field model 10 4.1 Step I 10 4.2 Step II 11 5 Discussion 13 1 Introduction Cosmological α-attractors [1{4] are among the very few inflationary models favored by the Planck2018 data [5, 6].
    [Show full text]
  • Inflation in String Theory: - Towards Inflation in String Theory - on D3-Brane Potentials in Compactifications with Fluxes and Wrapped D-Branes
    1935-6 Spring School on Superstring Theory and Related Topics 27 March - 4 April, 2008 Inflation in String Theory: - Towards Inflation in String Theory - On D3-brane Potentials in Compactifications with Fluxes and Wrapped D-branes Liam McAllister Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA hep-th/0308055 SLAC-PUB-9669 SU-ITP-03/18 TIFR/TH/03-06 Towards Inflation in String Theory Shamit Kachru,a,b Renata Kallosh,a Andrei Linde,a Juan Maldacena,c Liam McAllister,a and Sandip P. Trivedid a Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA b SLAC, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309, USA c Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA d Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400 005, INDIA We investigate the embedding of brane inflation into stable compactifications of string theory. At first sight a warped compactification geometry seems to produce a naturally flat inflaton potential, evading one well-known difficulty of brane-antibrane scenarios. Care- arXiv:hep-th/0308055v2 23 Sep 2003 ful consideration of the closed string moduli reveals a further obstacle: superpotential stabilization of the compactification volume typically modifies the inflaton potential and renders it too steep for inflation. We discuss the non-generic conditions under which this problem does not arise. We conclude that brane inflation models can only work if restric- tive assumptions about the method of volume stabilization, the warping of the internal space, and the source of inflationary energy are satisfied. We argue that this may not be a real problem, given the large range of available fluxes and background geometries in string theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Pure De Sitter Supergravity
    Pure de Sitter supergravity The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Bergshoeff, Eric A., Daniel Z. Freedman, Renata Kallosh, and Antonie Van Proeyen. "Pure de Sitter supergravity." Phys. Rev. D 92, 085040 (October 2015). © 2015 American Physical Society As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.085040 Publisher American Physical Society Version Final published version Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/99486 Terms of Use Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. PHYSICAL REVIEW D 92, 085040 (2015) Pure de Sitter supergravity † ‡ Eric A. Bergshoeff,1,* Daniel Z. Freedman,2,3, Renata Kallosh,2, and Antoine Van Proeyen4,§ 1Van Swinderen Institute for Particle Physics and Gravity, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, Netherlands 2SITP and Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA 3Center for Theoretical Physics and Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA 4KU Leuven, Institute for Theoretical Physics, Celestijnenlaan 200D, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium (Received 30 July 2015; published 27 October 2015) Using superconformal methods we derive an explicit de Sitter supergravity action invariant under spontaneously broken local N ¼ 1 supersymmetry. The supergravity multiplet interacts with a nilpotent Goldstino multiplet. We present a complete locally supersymmetric action including the graviton and the fermionic fields, gravitino and Goldstino, no scalars. In the global limit when the supergravity multiplet decouples, our action reproduces the Volkov-Akulov theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Renata Kallosh
    Renata Kallosh with Linde and with Ceco, Ferrara, Porra, Van Proeyen, Bercnocke, Roest, Westphal, Wrase We discuss inflaonary models which are flexiBle enough to fit the data (Planck 2013 or BICEP2 or in Between), which can Be implemented in string theory/supergravity, and which may tell us something interes7ng and instruc7ve about the fundamental theory from the sky We descriBe new models of inflaon and dark energy/cc. New results on de SiSer Landscape: how to avoid tachyons in string theory mo7vated supergravi7es Recent new tools have allowed us to construct new simple models of inflaon with dS upliUing in the context of spontaneously Broken supersymmetry A nilpotent chiral mul7plet, Volkov-Akulov golds7no and A New Toy In Town! D-Brane physics BICEP: Pretty Swirly Things r 0.2 ⇠ BICEP2 - Planck Drama IsIs ItIt Dust?Dust? IsIs ItIt Dust?Dust? Flauger, Hill, Spergel June 2014 r =0 (Flauger, Hill, & Spergel, arXiv:1405:7351) (Flauger, Hill, & Spergel, arXiv:1405:7351) Genus Topology and Cross-Correlaon of BICEP2 and Planck 353 GHz B-Modes: Further Evidence Favoring Gravity Wave Detec7on Genus TopologyWesley N. Colley and J. Richard and Cross-Correlation of BICEP2 with PlanckGo 353, III, SeptemBer 2014 GHz B-modes: Further Evidence for Gravity Wave Detection 11 Table 1. Relative contributions to BICEP map, for di↵erent anal- yses of the dust. The error on each measured correlation, CPB, is estimated to be 0.039. C⇤ refers to the correlation necessary to imply a r of 0. In all cases, the correlation measured is at least 2.5σ below this level (for Maps I–V, these levels are 2.6σ,4.9σ, 3.1σ,4.1σ and 3.1σ).
    [Show full text]
  • Pos(EDSU2018)043 ∗ [email protected] Speaker
    Supergravity and Cosmology PoS(EDSU2018)043 Renata Kallosh∗ Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics and Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA E-mail: [email protected] For cosmology we need General Relativity. Supergravity is the next natural step after General Relativity. Superstring theory is believed to be the most fundamental theory we know. How- ever, string theory has an emergent concept of space-time. To use it in the context of the 4- dimensional General Relativity and cosmology requires many intermediate steps. If in these steps some amount of supersymmetry, maximal or minimal or intermediate, is preserved, one finds consequences for cosmology, potentially supportable or falsifiable by observations. 2nd World Summit: Exploring the Dark Side of the Universe 25-29 June, 2018 - EDSU2018 University of Antilles, Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe, France ∗Speaker. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). http://pos.sissa.it/ Short Title for header Renata Kallosh Fundamental idea following the discovery of General Relativity is the idea of local super- symmetry. Einstein’s dream of unifying electromagnetism and gravity was realized starting with extended N = 2 supergravity. The model does so by adding two real gravitino to the photon and the graviton. The first breakthroughPlanck 2015 into finiteness of quantum supergravity occurred via this unifi- cation: an explicit calculation of photon-photon scattering which was known to be divergent in the coupled bosonic Maxwell-Einstein system yielded a dramaticB- resultmodes : the new diagrams involving gravitinos cancelled the divergences found previously.
    [Show full text]
  • Inflationary Cosmology After Planck 2013 Arxiv:1402.0526V2 [Hep-Th]
    Inflationary Cosmology after Planck 20131 Andrei Linde Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 Abstract I give a general review of inflationary cosmology and of its present status, in view of the 2013 data release by the Planck satellite. A specific emphasis is given to the new broad class of theories, the cosmological attractors, which have nearly model-independent predictions converging at the sweet spot of the Planck data in the (ns; r) plane. I also discuss the problem of initial conditions for the theories favored by the Planck data. Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Brief history of inflation 3 3 Chaotic Inflation: the simplest models 5 4 Initial conditions in the simplest models of chaotic inflation 8 arXiv:1402.0526v2 [hep-th] 9 Mar 2014 5 Solving the cosmological problems 10 6 Creation of matter after inflation: reheating and preheating 11 7 Quantum fluctuations and density perturbations 12 8 Universe or Multiverse? 16 9 Eternal inflation 17 1 Based on the lectures at the Les Houches School \Post-Planck Cosmology," 2013 10 Initial conditions for low-scale inflation 21 10.1 Low-scale inflation and topology of the universe . 21 10.2 Initial conditions in models with several non-interacting scalars . 23 10.3 Initial conditions in models with several interacting scalars . 23 11 Inflation and observations 24 12 Chaotic inflation in supergravity 28 13 Cosmological attractors 34 13.1 Starobinsky model . 34 13.2 Chaotic inflation in the theories with non-minimal coupling to gravity . 35 13.2.1 Universal cosmological attractors . 35 13.2.2 Unitarity bound? .
    [Show full text]
  • N=8 Supergravity on the Light Cone
    N = 8 Supergravity on the Light Cone Renata Kallosh Stanford University Based on: RK, arXiv:0903.4630 Supersymmetry, Branes and M-Theory: A Meeting in Celebration of Michael Duff's 60th Birthday, Imperial College London, 1st-2nd April 2009 Renata Kallosh (Stanford University) N = 8 Supergravity on the Light Cone April 6, 2009 1 / 18 Based on the action depending on unconstrained light-cone scalar superfield, this functional provides a d=4 regular QFT path integral derivation of the Nair-type amplitude constructions. We also point out an interesting relation between our light-cone formalism and supertwistors. By performing a Fourier transform into the light-cone chiral coordinate superspace we find that the quantum corrections to the superfield amplitudes with n legs are non-local in transverse directions for the diagrams with the number of loops smaller than n(n − 1)=2 + 1. This suggests the reason why UV infinities, which are proportional to local vertices, cannot appear at least before 7 loops in the light-cone supergraph computations. By combining the E7(7) symmetry with the supersymmetric recursion relations we argue that the light-cone supergraphs predict all loop finiteness of d=4 N =8 SG. We suggest a list of \things to do" to validate this prediction. Abstract of arXiv:0903.4630 We construct the generating functional for the light-cone momentum space superfield amplitudes. This functional generates the light-cone n-point particle amplitudes which on shell are equivalent to the covariant ones. Renata Kallosh (Stanford University) N = 8 Supergravity on the Light Cone April 6, 2009 2 / 18 By performing a Fourier transform into the light-cone chiral coordinate superspace we find that the quantum corrections to the superfield amplitudes with n legs are non-local in transverse directions for the diagrams with the number of loops smaller than n(n − 1)=2 + 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Jhep01(2020)169
    Published for SISSA by Springer Received: October 22, 2019 Revised: December 19, 2019 Accepted: January 16, 2020 Published: January 28, 2020 JHEP01(2020)169 Mass production of type IIA dS vacua Renata Kallosh and Andrei Linde Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics and Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: A three-step procedure is proposed in type IIA string theory to stabilize mul- tiple moduli in a dS vacuum. The first step is to construct a progenitor model with a localized stable supersymmetric Minkowski vacuum, or a discrete set of such vacua. It can be done, for example, using two non-perturbative exponents in the superpotential for each modulus, as in the KL model [1]. A large set of supersymmetric Minkowski vacua with strongly stabilized moduli is protected by a theorem on stability of these vacua in absence of flat directions [2]. The second step involves a parametrically small downshift to a super- symmetric AdS vacuum, which can be achieved by a small change of the superpotential. The third step is an uplift to a dS vacuum with a positive cosmological constant using the D6-brane contribution [3,4 ]. Stability of the resulting dS vacuum is inherited from the stability of the original supersymmetric Minkowski vacuum if the supersymmetry breaking in dS vacuum is parametrically small [2,5 ]. Keywords: Supergravity Models, Superstring Vacua, D-branes ArXiv ePrint: 1910.08217 Open Access, c The Authors. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2020)169
    [Show full text]
  • Renata Kallosh Professor of Physics And, by Courtesy, of Mathematics Curriculum Vitae Available Online
    Renata Kallosh Professor of Physics and, by courtesy, of Mathematics Curriculum Vitae available Online CONTACT INFORMATION • Administrative Contact Julie L Shih Email [email protected] Bio BIO What is the mathematical structure of supergravity/string theory and its relation to cosmology? Professor Kallosh works on the general structure of supergravity and string theory and their applications to cosmology. Her main interests are related to the models early universe inflation and dark energy in string theory. She develops string theory models explaining the origin of the universe and its current acceleration. With her collaborators, she has recently constructed de Sitter supergravity, which is most suitable for studies of inflation and dark energy and spontaneously broken supersymmetry. She is analyzing possible consequences of the expected new data from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and the results of current and future cosmological observations, including Planck satellite CMB data. These results may affect the relationship between superstring theory and supergravity, and the real world. Professor Kallosh works, in particular, on future tests of string theory by CMB data and effective supergravity models with flexible amplitude of gravitational waves produced during inflation. ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS • Professor, Physics • Professor (By courtesy), Mathematics ADMINISTRATIVE APPOINTMENTS • Professor of Physics, Stanford University, (1990- present) • Junior Research Fellow, Lebedev Physical Institute, (1968-1981) • Professor, Lebedev
    [Show full text]
  • Renata Kallosh Emanuele Orazi Editors Theoretical Perspective In
    Springer Proceedings in Physics 176 Renata Kallosh Emanuele Orazi Editors Theoretical Frontiers in Black Holes and Cosmology Theoretical Perspective in High Energy Physics Springer Proceedings in Physics Volume 176 The series Springer Proceedings in Physics, founded in 1984, is devoted to timely reports of state-of-the-art developments in physics and related sciences. Typically based on material presented at conferences, workshops and similar scientific meetings, volumes published in this series will constitute a comprehensive up-to-date source of reference on a field or subfield of relevance in contemporary physics. Proposals must include the following: – name, place and date of the scientific meeting – a link to the committees (local organization, international advisors etc.) – scientific description of the meeting – list of invited/plenary speakers – an estimate of the planned proceedings book parameters (number of pages/ articles, requested number of bulk copies, submission deadline). More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/361 Renata Kallosh • Emanuele Orazi Editors Theoretical Frontiers in Black Holes and Cosmology Theoretical Perspective in High Energy Physics 123 Editors Renata Kallosh Emanuele Orazi Department of Physics Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia Stanford University Universidade Federal Rio Grande do Norte Stanford, CA Natal, RN USA Brazil ISSN 0930-8989 ISSN 1867-4941 (electronic) Springer Proceedings in Physics ISBN 978-3-319-31351-1 ISBN 978-3-319-31352-8 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-31352-8 Library
    [Show full text]
  • Inflation in String Theory
    InflationInflation inin StringString TheoryTheory RenataRenata KalloshKallosh Stanford Texas Symposium, Stanford, December 13, 2004 OutlineOutline Recent progress in string theory cosmology Flux Compactification and Stabilization of Moduli, Metastable de Sitter Space in String Theory Landscape of String Theory, CC problem (More in a talk by L. Susskind on December 15) InflationInflation inin StringString TheoryTheory Cosmic Strings How cosmology has affected string theory and particle physics NewNew classclass ofof inflationaryinflationary modelsmodels inin stringstring theorytheory KKLMMT brane-anti-brane inflation D3/D7 brane inflation Racetrack modular inflation DBI inflation, Silverstein et al Our Universe is an Ultimate Test of Fundamental Physics High-energy accelerators will probe the scale of energies way below GUT scales Cosmology and astrophysics are sources of data in the gravitational sector of the fundamental physics (above GUT, near Planck scale) CosmologicalCosmological ConcordanceConcordance ModelModel Early Universe Inflation Current Acceleration NearNear dede SitterSitter spacespace NearNear dede SitterSitter spacespace 13.7 billion years ago Now During 10^{-35} sec During few billion years Impact of the discovery of acceleration of the universe Until recently, string theory could not describe acceleration of the early universe (inflation) The discovery of current acceleration made the problem even more severe, but also helped to identify the root of the problem StringString TheoryTheory andand CosmologyCosmology
    [Show full text]
  • D-Term Strings the D-Strings? 8
    SU-ITP-03/32 NYU-TH-03/11/09 KUL-TF-03/33 hep-th/0312005 D-term strings Gia Dvali 1, Renata Kallosh 2 and Antoine Van Proeyen 3 1 Center for Cosmology and Particle Physics, Department of Physics, New York University, New York, NY 10003 2 Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4060, USA. 3 Instituut voor Theoretische Fysica, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200D B-3001 Leuven, Belgium. Abstract We study the embedding of cosmic strings, related to the Abrikosov-Nielsen-Olesen vortex solution, into d = 4, N = 1 supergravity. We find that the local cosmic string solution which saturates the BPS bound of supergravity with D-term potential for the Higgs field and with constant Fayet– arXiv:hep-th/0312005v3 27 Jan 2004 Iliopoulos term, has 1/2 of supersymmetry unbroken. We observe an interesting relation between the gravitino supersymmetry transformation, positive energy condition and the deficit angle of the cosmic string. We argue that the string solutions with magnetic flux with F -term potential cannot be supersymmetric, which leads us to a conjecture that D1-strings (wrapped D1+q-branes) of string theory in the effective 4d supergravity are described by the D-term strings that we study in this paper. We give various consistency checks of this conjecture, and show that it highlights some generic properties of non-BPS string theory backgrounds, such as brane-anti-brane systems. Supersymmetry breaking by such systems can be viewed as FI D-term breaking, which implies, under certain conditions, the presence of gauged R-symmetry on such backgrounds.
    [Show full text]