<<

Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.66.780.872 on 1 October 1990. Downloaded from Postgrad Med J (1990) 66, 872 - 873 © The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine, 1990 Small with multiple perforations due to enterolith () formed without gastrointestinal pathology Aws S. Salim Department ofSurgery, The RoyalInfirmary, Perth, PHI INX, UK.

Summary: An enterolith (bezoar) usually originates in an intestinal diverticulum or in a segment of bowel loculated by stricture formation. Stasis promotes its formation. This communication describes a case in which a large enterolith caused obstruction and multiple perforations of the terminal ileum in the absence of any predisposing gastrointestinal pathology. The management of this rare occurrence is discussed and the literature reviewed.

Introduction An enterolith (bezoar) usually originates in an Abdominal examination revealed generalized ten- intestinal diverticulum or in a segment of bowel derness with guarding. A full blood count showed a loculated by stricture formation.' Stasis, caused normal haemoglobin (14 g/dl) but a raised white partly by the presence of undigested vegetable cell count at 18.5 x 109/l with 90%

neutrophils. by copyright. material and partly by disordered jejunal peristal- Blood, urea and electrolytes showed changes con- sis,2'3 promotes the accumulation of bile and the sistent with dehydration. Liver function tests, multiplication of bacteria. The bacteria convert serum amylase and blood sugar were within normal cholic acid to insoluble deoxycholic acid and also limits. Her chest X-ray and electrocardiograph split glycine and taurine from the bile salts resulting demonstrated no abnormality. Abdominal radio- in the precipitation ofthese materials around some graphs revealed evidence of a distended small nucleus such as a plum stone.2 bowel and intraperitoneal gas. After appropriate This communication describes a case in which a resuscitation and a single dose of three antibiotics large enterolith caused obstruction and multiple given intravenously at induction of anaesthesia perforations ofthe terminal ileum in the absence of 4 80 metronidazole (piperacillin g; gentamicin mg; http://pmj.bmj.com/ any predisposing gastrointestinal pathology. 500 mg), an emergency laparotomy was perform- ed. At operation there was copious purulent fluid in Case report the peritoneal cavity, a 20 cm grossly dilated and congested segment of distal ileum with patchy A 69 year old woman was admitted to hospital with ischaemia and 3 perforations at necrotic points, a 4-day history ofnausea, vomiting and abdominal and fluid-filled, oedematous, distended loops of pain. Initially the pain was colicky and para- proximal small bowel. Palpation revealed a hard, on September 30, 2021 by guest. Protected umbilical with a more constant right iliac fossa 2.5cm intraluminal mass, 30cm distal to the ache, but after 3 days it became severe and gangrenous segment and 25 cm proximal to the generalized. Her previous history was unremark- ileocaecal junction. Apart from diverticulae of the able. sigmoid colon, no other abnormality was detected On examination she was confused, in some within the peritoneal cavity. The gallbladder, com- distress and slightly flushed with a temperature of mon bile duct, stomach and duodenum were 37.7°C. She was clinically dehydrated. Her pulse normal and no diverticulae were seen in the small was 98/min with blood pressure of 100/70 mmHg. bowel. The enterolith was milked into the infarcted segment of small bowel which was then resected and an end-to-end anastomosis performed. The Correspondence: A.S. Salim, Ph.D.(Surg), F.R.C.S.Ed., abdomen was closed after thorough Noxyflex F.R.C.S.Glasg, F.I.C.S. The Department of Surgery, peritoneal toilet. The patient made an uneventful Ward 6, Stobhill General Hospital, Glasgow, G21 3UW, recovery. She was well when seen after 6 weeks in UK. the surgical follow-up clinic. Accepted: 25 April 1990 Laboratory analysis of the stone confirmed that Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.66.780.872 on 1 October 1990. Downloaded from CLINICAL REPORTS 873 it was an enterolith and histology examination of associated with any gastrointestinal pathology that the resected segment of intestine showed acute could explain its formation. It was probably due to inflammatory changes with ischaemic perforations a disordered intestinal motility. Stasis, caused of the wall. No evidence of any other pathology partly by the presence of undigested vegetable was detected. material and partly by disordered jejunal peristal- sis,2'3 promotes the accumulation of bile and the multiplication of bacteria. The bacteria convert Discussion cholic acid to insoluble deoxycholic acid and also splitglycine and taurine from the bile salts resulting Causes of intraluminal intestinal obstruction in- in the precipitation ofthese materials around some clude enteroliths (), which are usually con- nucleus of undigested vegetable material. cretions of vegetable matter and food, parasites In this case presented, the ischaemic perforations and .4'5 Rare causes include ginger or of the small bowel appear to have developed at drug enteroliths,6 or enteroliths formed in decubital ulcers produced at sites of earlier impac- duodenal diverticulae.7 Enzymic digestion of gast- tions proximal to the final one. The enterolith was ric bezoars has also given rise to intestinal obstruc- disimpacted proximally by milking towards the tion.8 Although more common after gastric lumen ofthe perforated segment ofsmall bowel for surgery, obstruction of the intestine due to its removal with the specimen. enteroliths can occur in the absence of an oper- If at laparotomy the small bowel obstruction is ation. uncomplicated by necrosis and perforation, the Obstruction of the small intestine by an entero- enterolith should be broken up manually and the lith from a diverticulum situated in the proximal fragments milked distally into the colon.7 When small intestine is rare.9 The condition was first this is unsuccessful, the enterolith should be milked reported by Philips in 1921 and a recent review had proximally and removed through an enterotomy,7 collected only 25 cases.7 Bewes and co-workers performed in a segment of normal bowel where a reported the formation ofa bile acid enterolith in a satisfactory closure can be obtained. In cases where jejunal diverticulum2 and afterwards this was a thin-walled diverticulum gave origin to the by copyright. similarly reported by King and associates.10 More enterolith and bears external evidence of delivery recently Deutsch et al." presented the first report of or doubtful viability, it should either be invagi- partial small bowel obstruction caused by a gastric nated into the lumen of the gut or imbricated with cancer bezoar. seromuscular sutures.'2 The presence of a second Enteroliths tend to remain in the diverticulae in enterolith, though exceedingly rare,7 and ' which they are formed.23 They may encroach on ' should also be excluded. When bulky gastric the intestinal lumen and cause obstruction to the tumours are resected, the small bowel must be passage of intestinal contents or they may lead to examined carefully for intraluminal obstructing diverticulitis and perforation ofthe diverticulum. If enteroliths (gastric cancer bezoars), which might, if the enterolith is expelled into the lumen, it may left, give rise to obstruction." http://pmj.bmj.com/ become impacted in a distal portion of the small intestine and cause obturation obstruction leading to local ischaemia and perforation.10 The case described in this communication is the Acknowledgement first report of small bowel obstruction with multi- The secretarial work of Miss Lesley Cook is gratefully ple perforations caused by an enterolith not acknowledged. on September 30, 2021 by guest. Protected References

1. Slater, S.N. Perforation and obstruction by enterolith com- 7. Shocket, E. & Simon, S.A. Small bowel obstruction due to plicating jejunal . Br J Surg 1953, 41: 60-62. enterolith (bezoar) formed in a duodenal diverticulum: a case 2. Bewes, P.C., Haslewood, G.A.D. & Roxburgh, R.A. Bile acid report and review of the literature. Am J Gastroenterol 1982, enterolith and jejunal diverticulosis. Br J Surg 1966, 53: 77: 621-624. 709-711. 8. Rumley, T.O., Hocking, M.P. & King, C.E. Small bowel 3. Walker, W.F., Kerr, G. & MacDonald, J.S. Enterolith ileus. obstruction secondary to enzymic digestion of a gastric Br J Surg 1960, 48: 132-145. bezoar. 1983, 84: 627-629. 4. Goldstein, S.S., Lewis, J.H. & Rothstein, R. Intestinal 9. Maull, K.I., Nicholson, B.W. & Mendez-Picon, G. Jejuno- obstruction due to bezoars. Am J Gastroenterol 1984 79: ileal diverticulosis. South Med J 1981, 74: 792-795. 313-318. 10. King, P.M., Bird, D.R. & Eremin, O. Enterolith obstruction 5. DeBakey, M. & Ochsner, A. Bezoars and concretions - a of the small bowel. J R Coil Surg Edinb 1985, 4: 269-270. comprehensive review of the literature with analysis of 303 11. Deutsch, A.A., Gutman, H., Mor, C. & Reiss, R. Gastric collected cases and a presentation of 8 additional cases. cancer bezoar. J R Coil Surg Edinb 1987, 32: 165-166. Surgery 1939, 4: 934-963. 12. Ottinger, L.W. & Carter, E.L. Obturation of the ileum by a 6. Liu, P.H.W. & Ho, H.L. Ginger and drug bezoars induced jejunal diverticular enterolith. Gastroenterology 1975, 68: small bowel obstruction. J R Coil Surg Edinb 1983, 28: 1596-1597. 397-398.