Vantage Towers Annual Financial Statements 2020-21 English

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Annual Financial Statements and Combined Management Report for the Financial Year from 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2021 Vantage Towers AG (formerly from 16 July 2020 to 26 January 2021: Vantage Towers GmbH, from 5 December 2019 to 15 July 2020: Vodafone Towers Germany GmbH), Düsseldorf 2 Vantage Towers AG —— Annual Financial Statements and Combined Management Report and Combined Management 2020/21 Annual Financial Statements AG —— Towers Vantage 3 Combined Management Report Company Profile market were grouped into a business unit within the Vodafone operating company Fundamentals of the Group in the respective market and then carved out of the operating company We are a leading towers company in into a separate legal entity controlled by Europe with approximately 82,000 macro Vodafone in a first step — either by way sites and approximately 7,100 micro of a hive-down, a demerger or otherwise. sites across ten markets, in nine of In a second step, each of these entities, which we rank either first or second by except for the German Towers Business number of sites. Vantage Towers Group which was assumed by the Company (hereinafter also referred to as “Vantage by way of the German hive-down, was Towers” or the “Group”) comprises the transferred to Central Tower Holding parent company Vantage Towers AG, a Company BV (CTHC), an indirect, wholly - stock corporation under the laws of the owned subsidiary of Vodafone Group, via Federal Republic of Germany, and its a share-for-share exchange. subsidiaries. The Company commenced trading in 2020 with business operations In Greece, Vodafone Group and Crystal conducted by Vantage Towers AG as well Almond Sarl, the controlling shareholder as by its direct and indirect subsidiaries. of Wind Hellas, agreed to demerge and As of 31 March 2021, Vantage Towers subsequently contribute their towers employed 327 people, excluding our businesses into Vantage Towers Greece, equity accounted investments in INWIT a jointly owned entity controlled by and Cornerstone, and its headquarters Vodafone Group. are located in Duesseldorf, Germany. The following steps completed the reorganisation of the Group: Establishment of the Vantage Towers Group ⏹ On 19 Novem ber 2020, Vodafone Group contributed its 33.2% shareholding in In order to create Vantage Towers, Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane SpA Vodafone Group separated its European (INWIT) to CTHC; tower infrastructure assets in Germany, ⏹ On 17 December 2020, CTHC was Spain, Greece, Portugal, the Czech acquired by the Company; Republic, Hungary, Romania, and ⏹ On 22 December 2020, CTHC acquired Ireland into a new stand-alone tower 62% of Vantage Towers Greece, infrastructure business — both legally followed by the remaining 38% on and operationally. In order to achieve 25 March 2021; and a complete separation of these tower ⏹ On 14 January 2021, CTHC acquired the infrastructure assets from the other 50% shareholding in Cornerstone, at parts of the Vodafone Group, the tower which point the process of establishing infrastructure assets in each relevant the Vantage Towers Group was com- pleted. 4 IPO Our principal business consists of building and operating telecommunica- On 18 March 2021, Vantage Towers AG tions sites in order to offer space, energy was successfully listed on the Regulated management and related services to Market (Prime Standard) of the Frankfurt customers that in turn provide mobile, Stock Exchange. In total, 92,372,558 voice, data and other services to end- shares from the holdings of Vodafone users. GmbH were placed with investors (after the partial exercise of the greenshoe Our portfolio of assets includes towers, option) at the offer price of €24.00, masts, rooftop sites, DAS and small cells. raising gross proceeds of approximately By building, operating and leasing this €2.2 billion for the selling shareholder. passive infrastructure to Vodafone and The implied free float for Vantage Towers other network operators, we are making a is 18.3%. significant contribution to better connec- tivity and the sustainable digitisation of Europe. Business model Our assets are supported by long-term Our business model combines four key contractual commitments with MNOs factors: that largely hold investment grade credit ratings, which provide predictable (i) Owning fully-integrated nationwide revenues typically adjusted periodically networks that are underpinned for inflation. This includes the inflation- by secure, long-term contractual linked Vodafone master services arrangements with a high-quality agreements (MSAs) with members of customer base, including leading the Vodafone Group, the leading MNO in MNOs in each market (source: Fitch Europe by number of mobile subscribers Solutions); (source: Fitch Solutions). Where our (ii) Controlling or co-controlling towers contracts with other MNO customers are that are part of the essential not currently linked to inflation, we aim consolidated grid of at least two of to include CPI (Consumer Price Index) the largest MNOs in markets where escalators in our customer contracts as the Vodafone Group has already they expire and are renegotiated. signed nationwide active sharing agreements, including Spain, Greece, In most of our markets, the majority of Portugal, Italy, the United Kingdom, our tower assets have been developed and Romania; organically over three decades with the (iii) Expanding the services offered by a aim to provide a first-class infrastructure tower company beyond the tradition- network. Consequently, the international al role of an infrastructure landlord site portfolio is well-integrated, benefits to MNOs to the role of a network from the strategic locations of its sites, enabler for a range of existing and and is an attractive potential host for new customers; and MNO customers looking to expand or (iv) Being at the forefront of enabling a densify their networks. resilient, inclusive digital society with a clear focus on sustainable infra- structure to minimise environmental impact. Vantage Towers AG —— Annual Financial Statements and Combined Management Report and Combined Management 2020/21 Annual Financial Statements AG —— Towers Vantage 5 Business Segments Spain Vantage Towers has four reporting Vantage Towers is the second largest segments, comprising Germany, Spain, telecommunications tower company Greece and Other European Markets. in Spain by number of sites. Spain These reporting segments reflect the represents our second largest market, basis on which we manage our business comprising 19% of our macro sites and and are reconciled to the Group’s con- 23% of our tenancies in our consolidated solidated financial statements for the markets as of 31 March 2021. twelve months ended 31 March 2021 in line with IFRS 8 “Operating Segments”. The Group’s site portfolio in Spain is well-balanced, has capacity for coloca- The reporting segments Germany, tion and has moderate overlap with the Spain and Greece include the Group’s site portfolios of its competitors. Our operations in each of these jurisdictions, portfolio of Spanish sites comprised respectively. The reporting segment approximately 8,700 macro sites as of Other European Markets comprise our 31 March 2021. operations in the Czech Republic, Hun- gary, Ireland, Portugal, and Romania. The Group’s overall tenancy ratio in Spain amounted to 1.7x as of 31 March 2021. In addition to these four segments, we ac- count for the results of our equity invest- Greece ments in INWIT and Cornerstone under “Share of results of equity accounted joint Vantage Towers Greece is the largest ventures” in our income statement. telecommunications tower company in Greece by number of sites. Greece is the Germany Group’s third largest market, comprising 11% of the Group’s macro sites and 12% of Vantage Towers is the second largest the Group’s tenancies in our Consolidated telecommunications tower company Markets as of 31 March 2021. in Germany by number of sites. As our largest market, Germany comprises 42% Our portfolio comprises approximately of our total macro sites and 37% of our 4,800 macro sites in Greece as of tenancies in our consolidated markets as 31 March 2021. of 31 March 2021. As of 31 March 2021, we recorded a Our site portfolio in Germany is well- tenancy ratio of 1.7x regarding our sites balanced. The sites have capacity to in Greece. co-locate additional tenants, and a significant proportion does not have competitors’ sites in the vicinity. As of 31 March 2021, Vantage Towers Germany’s portfolio comprised approximately 19,400 macro sites. As of 31 March 2021, the tenancy ratio amounted to 1.2x on our macro sites in Germany. 6 Other European Markets Co-controlled joint ventures and joint operations The Group’s Other European Markets segment includes its operations in Portu- The Group’s co-controlled joint ventures gal, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Ireland, and joint operations include INWIT and and Romania. We rank second in the Cornerstone. INWIT and Cornerstone market by number of sites in the Czech rank first in their respective markets Republic, Ireland, Portugal, and Hungary by number of sites in Italy and the UK and fourth in Romania (source: Company (source: Company Market Position Market Position Assessment). Across Assessment). INWIT operates approxi- these markets, the Group operated a mately 22,300 macro sites with a ten- total of approximately 12,700 macro sites, ancy ratio of 1.9x. Cornerstone operates comprising 28% of the Group’s macro approxi mately 14,200 macro sites with sites and 28% of the Group’s tenancies a tenancy ratio
Recommended publications
  • Abführungskontrolle Positivliste 2017

    Abführungskontrolle Positivliste 2017

    ver.di Abführungskontrolle Seite 1 von 29 Positivliste 2017 (Stand: 24.08.2020; Nachveröffentlichungen siehe am Tabellenende) Nr. Nachname Vorname Unternehmen 1. Abel Wolfgang Hamburger Hafen- und Logistik AG 2. Adam Annette Verwaltungsgesellschaft Otto mbH 3. Adams Michael AVU Aktiengesellschaft für Versorgungs-Unternehmen 4. Ahrweiler Elina Basler Lebensversicherungs-Aktiengesellschaft 5. Ahting Detlef Bremer Straßenbahn AG Kraftverkehrsgesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung Braunschweig (KVG Braunschweig) Norddeutscher Rundfunk (Rundfunkrat) 6. Albrecht Rosemarie Kasseler Sparkasse 7. Albrecht Wilfried Avacon AG 8. Alex Hendrik Klinikum Region Hannover GmbH 9. Alpers Udo Sparkasse Stade-Altes Land 10. Althoff Claudia WBO Wirtschaftsbetriebe Oberhausen GmbH 11. Altmann Dieter Securitas Holding GmbH STRÖER Dialog Group Verwaltung Hamburg GmbH (Avedo) 12. Amier Claudia Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide 13. Amthor Jens PSD Bank Nord eG 14. Angerer Manfred e-netz Südhessen AG ENTEGA AG 15. Angermaier Benno Stadtwerke München GmbH SWM Services GmbH 16. Angst Roland Telekom Deutschland GmbH 17. Anscheit Heike Commerzbank AG 18. Anthonisen Holger swb AG 19. Antoni Yvonne Helios Klinikum Erfurt GmbH 20. Apsel Horst OIE AG 21. Arndt Norbert Energie- und Wasserversorgung Mittleres Ruhrgebiet GmbH 22. Arslan Aydogan Bochum-Gelsenkirchener Straßenbahnen AG (BOGESTRA) 23. Aufderstroth Andrea Stadtwerke Gütersloh GmbH 24. Backmann Renate Leipziger Verkehrsbetriebe GmbH Bahn Andreas HGV Hamburger Gesellschaft für Verm.- u. Beteiligungsmanagement mbH 25. 26. Baier Rainer Bausparkasse Schwäbisch Hall AG 27. Balder Janine MEDIAN Kliniken GmbH 28. Ball Mira Kölner Verkehrs-Betriebe AG üstra Hannoversche Verkehrsbetriebe AG 29. Ballhause Torsten Hamburger Hafen- und Logistik AG HGV Hamburger Gesellschaft für Verm.- u. Beteiligungsmanagement mbH 30. Balzer Bernd Transdev GmbH 31. Bandosz Oliver Charles Vögele Deutschland GmbH 32.
  • Corporate Non-Financial Reporting in Germany

    Corporate Non-Financial Reporting in Germany

    Copyright © Development International e.V., 2019 ISBN: 978-3-9820398-1-7 Authors: Chris N. Bayer, PhD Gisella Vogel Sarah Kaltenhäuser Katherine Storrs Jiahua (Java) Xu, PhD Juan Ignacio Ibañez, LL.M. Title: A New Responsibility for Sustainability: Corporate Non-Financial Reporting in Germany Date published: May 6, 2019 Funded by: iPoint-systems gmbh www.ipoint-systems.com Executive Summary Germany's economy is the fourth-largest in the world (by nominal GDP), and with 28% of the euro area market, it represents the largest economy in Europe.1 Considering the supply chains leading to its economy, Germany's cumulative environmental, social and governance performance reverberates globally. The EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) is the impetus behind this study – a new regulation that seeks to “increase the relevance, consistency and comparability of information disclosed by certain large undertakings and groups across the Union.”2 Large undertakings in EU member states are not only required to report on their financial basics, now they are also required by Article 1 of the Directive to account for their non- financial footprint, including adverse impacts they have on the environment and supply chains. In accordance with the Directive, the German transposition stipulates that the non-financial declaration must state which reporting framework was used to create it (or explain why no framework was applied), as well as apply non-financial key performance indicators relevant to the particular business. These requirements are our point of departure: We systematically assess the degree of non-financial transparency and performance reporting for 2017 applying an ex-post assessment framework premised on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the German Sustainability Code (Deutscher Nachhaltigkeitskodex, DNK) and the United Nations Global Compact (UNGC).
  • WOMEN-ON-BOARD-INDEX II Aufsichtsräte Anteilseignerseite Und Vorstände Powered by Fidar

    WOMEN-ON-BOARD-INDEX II Aufsichtsräte Anteilseignerseite Und Vorstände Powered by Fidar

    WOMEN-ON-BOARD-INDEX II Aufsichtsräte Anteilseignerseite und Vorstände powered by FidAR Weibl. Weibl. Zahl Zahl Anteil Zahl Zahl Anteil WoB-Index Posit AN- AR Unternehmen Notierung AR- Frauen Frauen Vorst. Frauen Frauen AR AE-Seite ion Vertr. Ant.eigne Mitgl. AR AR o. AN mitgl. Vorst. Vorst. + Vorst. im AR rseite 1 GfK SE SDAX 10 3 1 2 20% 6 3 50% 35,00% 2 Deutz AG SDAX 12 1 1 0 0% 2 1 50% 25,00% 2 Gerry Weber AG SDAX 6 1 0 1 17% 3 1 33% 25,00% 2 SKW Stahl-Metallurgie Holding AG SDAX 6 1 0 1 17% 3 1 33% 25,00% 5 Q-Cells SE TecDAX 8 2 1 1 13% 4 1 25% 18,75% 6 Centrotherm photovoltaics AG TecDAX 3 1 0 1 33% 5 0 0% 16,67% 6 MorphoSys AG TecDAX 6 0 0 0 0% 3 1 33% 16,67% 8 C.A.T. Oil AG SDAX 3 0 0 0 0% 4 1 25% 12,50% 8 Gildemeister AG MDAX 12 0 0 0 0% 4 1 25% 12,50% 8 Phoenix Solar AG TecDAX 6 0 0 0 0% 4 1 25% 12,50% 8 Siemens AG DAX 20 4 3 1 5% 10 2 20% 12,50% 12 Douglas Holding AG MDAX 16 8 7 1 6% 6 1 17% 11,46% 13 Axel Springer AG MDAX 9 2 0 2 22% 4 0 0% 11,11% 13 Sky Deutschland AG MDAX 9 2 0 2 22% 4 0 0% 11,11% 15 E.ON AG DAX 20 2 1 1 5% 6 1 17% 10,83% 16 Drägerwerk AG & Co.
  • CCP Instruments As of 2003 03 27 Engl

    CCP Instruments As of 2003 03 27 Engl

    First introduction sequence of CCP instruments as of March 27, 2003 CCP Instruments DAX Block Crossing DAX (Xetra XXL) + corresponding instruments 1 DE0008232125 LHA LUFTHANSA AG VNA O.N. 1 BC0008232125 BCLHA LUFTHANSA AG VNA O.N. 2 DE0007172009 SCH SCHERING AG O.N. 2 BC0007172009 BCSCH SCHERING AG O.N. CCP Instruments MDAX + corresponding instruments Block Crossing MDAX (Xetra XXL) 1 DE0002457561 HEIJ HEIDELBERGCEMENT O.N. NST 2 DE0005072102 BZL BERU AG O.N. 1 BC0005072102 BCBZL BERU AG 3 DE0005085906 AWD AWD HOLDING AG O.N. 2 BC0005085906 BCAWD AWD HOLDING AG O.N. 4 DE0005200000 BEI BEIERSDORF AG O.N. 3 BC0005200000 BCBEI BEIERSDORF AG O.N. 5 DE0005245500 BOS HUGO BOSS AG ST O.N. 6 DE0005245534 BOS3 HUGO BOSS AG VZO O.N. 4 BC0005245534 BBOS3 HUGO BOSS AG VZO O.N. 7 DE0005278006 BUD BUDERUS AG O.N. 5 BC0005278006 BCBUD BUDERUS AG O.N. 8 DE0005408116 ARL AAREAL BANK AG 6 BC0005408116 BCARL AAREAL BANK AG 9 DE0005408884 LEO LEONI AG NA O.N. 7 BC0005408884 BCLEO LEONI AG 10 DE0005421903 DGX DEGUSSA AG O.N. 8 BC0005421903 BCDGX DEGUSSA AG O.N. 11 DE0005439004 CON CONTINENTAL AG O.N. 9 BC0005439004 BCCON CONTINENTAL AG O.N. 12 DE0005471601 TNH TECHEM O.N. 10 BC0005471601 BCTNH TECHEM O.N. 13 DE0005591002 DYK DYCKERHOFF ST O.N. 14 DE0005591036 DYK3 DYCKERHOFF VZO O.N. 11 BC0005591036 BDYK3 DYCKERHOFF VZO O.N. 15 DE0005753008 CZZ CELANESE AG O.N. 12 BC0005753008 BCCZZ CELANESE AG O.N. 16 DE0005773303 FRA FRAPORT AG FFM.AIRPORT 13 BC0005773303 BCFRA FRAPORT AG 17 DE0005785604 FRE FRESENIUS AG O.N.
  • Vollständigen Women-On-Board-Index 185 III Als

    Vollständigen Women-On-Board-Index 185 III Als

    WoB-Index 185 III AN-Seite Women-On-Board-Index 185 III Frauenanteil auf Arbeitnehmerseite des Aufsichtsrats der 160 im DAX, MDAX und SDAX und der 26 paritätisch mitbestimmten, im Regulierten Markt notierten Unternehmen zum Gesamtaufsichtsrat (Stand 15.01.2021 - aktualisiert zum 22.03.2021) Anteil Gesamt Zahl Anteil Ges.zahl Frauen Position Frauen AN- Unternehmen zahl AR- Frauen Frauen Arbeitneh AN- 22.03.2021 Seite z Mitgl. AR AR merseite Seite Notierung Ges-AR 1 CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA SDAX 12 7 58,33% 6 4 33,33% 1 Gerry Weber International AG Reg. Markt 12 6 50,00% 6 4 33,33% 1 Hannover Rück SE MDAX 9 5 55,56% 3 3 33,33% 4 Infineon Technologies AG DAX / TecDAX 16 8 50,00% 8 5 31,25% 5 Deutsche Telekom AG DAX / TecDAX 20 9 45,00% 10 6 30,00% 6 SAP SE DAX / TecDAX 18 8 44,44% 9 5 27,78% 7 Amadeus Fire AG SDAX 12 5 41,67% 6 3 25,00% 7 Beiersdorf AG MDAX 12 5 41,67% 6 3 25,00% 7 Bilfinger SE SDAX 12 5 41,67% 6 3 25,00% 7 BREMER LAGERHAUS-GESELLSCHAFT Reg. Markt 16 6 37,50% 8 4 25,00% 7 CompuGroup Medical SE & Co. KGaA MDAX / TecDAX 12 5 41,67% 6 3 25,00% 7 Covestro AG DAX 12 5 41,67% 6 3 25,00% 7 DMG MORI AG Reg. Markt 12 5 41,67% 6 3 25,00% 7 Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA DAX 12 5 41,67% 6 3 25,00% 7 GEA Group AG MDAX 12 6 50,00% 6 3 25,00% 7 Hapag-Lloyd AG Reg.
  • Determinants and Value of Enterprise Risk Management: Empirical Evidence from Germany

    Determinants and Value of Enterprise Risk Management: Empirical Evidence from Germany

    Determinants and Value of Enterprise Risk Management: Empirical Evidence from Germany Philipp Lechner, Nadine Gatzert Working Paper Department of Insurance Economics and Risk Management Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) Version: February 2017 1 DETERMINANTS AND VALUE OF ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM GERMANY Philipp Lechner, Nadine Gatzert* This version: February 21, 2017 ABSTRACT Enterprise risk management (ERM) has become increasingly relevant in recent years, espe- cially due to an increasing complexity of risks and the further development of regulatory frameworks. The aim of this paper is to empirically analyze firm characteristics that deter- mine the implementation of an ERM system and to study the impact of ERM on firm value. We focus on companies listed at the German stock exchange, which to the best of our knowledge is the first empirical study with a cross-sectional analysis for Germany and one of the first for a European country. Our findings show that size, international diversifica- tion, and the industry sector (banking, insurance, energy) positively impact the implementa- tion of an ERM system, and financial leverage is negatively related to ERM engagement. In addition, our results confirm a significant positive impact of ERM on shareholder value. Keywords: Enterprise risk management; firm characteristics; shareholder value JEL Classification: G20; G22; G32 1. INTRODUCTION In recent years, enterprise risk management (ERM) has become increasingly relevant, espe- cially against the background of an increasing complexity of risks, increasing dependencies between risk sources, more advanced methods of risk identification and quantification and information technologies, the consideration of ERM systems in rating processes, as well as stricter regulations in the aftermath of the financial crisis, among other drivers (see, e.g., Hoyt and Liebenberg, 2011; Pagach and Warr, 2011).
  • Abstimmungsergebnisse Deka Investment Gmbh

    Abstimmungsergebnisse Deka Investment Gmbh

    Abstimmungsergebnisse Deka Investment GmbH Zeitraum: 1. Januar 2021 – 31. August 2021 Abstimmungsergebnisse Deka Investment GmbH 1&1 Drillisch AG Meeting Date: 26/05/2021 Country: Germany Meeting Type: Annual T ick er: DRI P r imary ISIN: DE0005545503 P r im ary SEDOL: 5734672 Proposal Vote Number Proposal Text P r o po ne nt M gmt Rec Instruction 1 Receiv e Financial Statements and Statutory Mgmt Reports for Fiscal Year 2020 (Non-Voting) 2 Approve Allocation of Income and Dividends Mgmt For For of EUR 0.05 per Share 3.1 Approve Discharge of Management Board Mgmt For For Member Ralph Dommermuth for Fiscal Year 2020 3.2 Approve Discharge of Management Board Mgmt For For Member Mark us Huhn for Fiscal Year 2020 3.3 Approve Discharge of Management Board Mgmt For For Member A lessandro Nav a for Fiscal Year 2020 4.1 Approve Discharge of Supervisory Board Mgmt For A gainst Member Kurt Dobitsch for Fiscal Year 2020 4.2 Approve Discharge of Supervisory Board Mgmt For For Member Kai-Uwe Rick e for Fiscal Year 2020 4.3 Approve Discharge of Supervisory Board Mgmt For For Member Michael Scheeren for Fiscal Year 2020 4.4 Approve Discharge of Supervisory Board Mgmt For For Member Claudia Borgas-Herold for Fiscal Year 2020 4.5 Approve Discharge of Supervisory Board Mgmt For For Member Vlasios C houlidis for Fiscal Year 2020 4.6 Approve Discharge of Supervisory Board Mgmt For For Member Norbert Lang for Fiscal Year 2020 5 Ratify Ernst & Young GmbH as Auditors for Mgmt For For Fiscal Year 2021 6 Elect Matthias Baldermann to the Superv isory Mgmt For For Board 7 Approve Remuneration Policy Mgmt For A gainst 8 Approve Remuneration of Supervisory Board Mgmt For For 9 Amend Articles Re: Proof of Entitlement Mgmt For For 10 Change Company Name to 1&1 AG Mgmt For For 2 Abstimmungsergebnisse Deka Investment GmbH 2U, Inc.
  • The World's First Certified Climate-Neutral Container

    The World's First Certified Climate-Neutral Container

    ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY IN PARTNERSHIP WITH IN PARTNERSHIP WITH ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY THE WORLD’S FIRST CERTIFIED CLIMATE-NEUTRAL CONTAINER TERMINAL Jan Hendrik Pietsch, Corporate Sustainability Manager, Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG Electrification and automation are the from 2018. The aim is to make the entire the company to achieve sustainable keys to sustainable success at the HHLA HHLA Group climate-neutral by 2040. results faster, which are equally accepted Container Terminal Altenwerder in In implementing its “Balanced Logistics” by shareholders, customers, employees Hamburg. sustainability strategy, HHLA is emphasizing and society. The port’s central location within its commitment to bringing together In keeping with this conviction, the Hamburg, a city of over 1.8 million environmental, social and economic world’s first certified climate-neutral inhabitants, poses challenges for port responsibility. Each is a prerequisite for container terminal has now been operations. Hamburger Hafen und the others: through economic success, the developed: HHLA Container Terminal Logistik AG (HHLA), which operates five company has the means and opportunity Altenwerder (CTA) in the Port of Hamburg. container terminals in Europe, is aware to invest in climate-friendly technologies The CTA’s certification is a clear example of of its responsibility to protect the climate and to meet its responsibility to society how innovation and automation can help in the Port of Hamburg and has been and the environment. container handling to become climate- implementing measures for economically neutral. Certification was first carried out efficient and environmentally sustainable USING TECHNOLOGICAL EXCELLENCE TO in 2019 through TÜV NORD CERT GmbH.
  • Hamburg News

    Hamburg News

    Hamburg News 05/2010 Mark it! Port with prospects Green buddies Sounds of Hamburg Since its introduction 50 years The right instinct for a successful Europe‘s Green Capital 2011, Ham- How does Hamburg sound to ago,“edding“ has become a future is a Hamburg tradition, co- burg, and France‘s solar metropo- you? Choose a spot and make its synonym for high-performance operations, concepts, and HHLA‘s lis Marseille are to intensify their music, the Philharmic Orchestra markers and fibre pens. (p. 2) 125-year jubilee confirm. (S. 3) co-operation in green issues. (S. 4) Hamburg invites web users. (p. 4) Newsflash Hamburg‘s Elbphilharmonie to celebrate topping-out ceremony Best location: Hamburg Two-day long event in May marks milestone on the path to the opening is Germany‘s number one location for commercial Hamburg‘s new cultural land- property. This was revealed mark will celebrate its topping- by a survey conducted by out: the Elbphilharmonie con- the Federal Institute for Re- cert hall at HafenCity. search on Building, Urban Celebrations will commence in Affairs and Spatial Deve- the evening before the official lopment (BBSR) among two-day event with a fundrai- 478 experts of commercial sing dinner on the construc- real estate. Hamburg was tion site on 27 May. The of- rated first, with 177 experts ficial topping-out ceremony certifying Hamburg further chances to increase its at- will follow Friday, 28 May, on tractiveness. Elbphilharmonie‘s plaza. In After Munich (173) as se- the evening, a public open-air cond, the Rhine-Main regi- concert, realised in co-opera- on was ranked third with tion with the Elbjazz festival, 102 respondents expecting will give a first taste of the di- an increase in attractive- versity of Elbphilarmonie‘s fu- views of Hamburg‘s skyline.
  • Annual Report 2007 Financial Year from January 1 to December 31, 2007

    Annual Report 2007 Financial Year from January 1 to December 31, 2007

    Annual Report 2007 Financial Year from January 1 to December 31, 2007 The Salzgitter Group 45 The Salzgitter Group comprises around 200 national and international subsidiaries and associated companies combined under Salzgitter AG as the holding company. With an annual production of rolled steel and tubes which comes to more than 7 million tons, external sales of approximately € 10 billion and a workforce of around 23,000, the Salzgitter Group ranks among Europe’s leading steel technology groups. The Group’s core competences lie in the production of rolled steel and tubes products and their processing, trading in these products and, more recently, in the construction of special machinery and plant engineering. The specific competences are concentrated in the respective divisions (Steel, Trading, Tubes, Services and Technology). The Divisions Steel Trading Services Tubes Technology The Steel Division is one of Europe’s five largest steel producers and the Tubes Division is a global leader in a number of sub-segments in its sector. The new Technology Division comprises the companies of the Klöckner Group. The Group’s key companies rank among the global leaders and preferred suppliers of plant solutions for the food industry. Salzgitter AG is listed on the MDAX and, on the basis of its placing within the index, belongs to Germany’s 35 largest stock corporations. Key Figures for the Financial Year 2007 Crude Steel Production 7,325 7,363 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 in kt FY 2007 FY 2006 Consolidated Sales 10,192 8,447 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 in € mil.
  • Süss Microtec

    Süss Microtec

    Süss MicroTec Germany/ Technology Hardware & Equipment Flash note Investment Research Reason: Estimates Revision 9 August 2016 Neutral H1-16 Review: Weakening operating activity leads to model from Accumulate adjustment, however investment case remains intact Share price: EUR 6.25 In the last quarters SUSS has set a new record for bookings resulting in a surge closing price as of 04/08/2016 in group’s sales and uptick in profitability. However, slowdown in semiconductor Target price: EUR 7.00 industry combined with rising competition and difficulties in marketing of new from Target Price: EUR 8.50 products make the realisation of our original forecast implausible. We appreciate Reuters/Bloomberg SMHNn.DE/SMH GY the group’s commitment to participate in arising opportunities (e.g. 3D Daily avg. no. trad. sh. 12 mth 119,047 integration) and restructuring of its bonder division which slowly start to bear Daily avg. trad. vol. 12 mth (m) 726.56 fruit. However, based on the aforementioned factors, we revise our model and Price high 12 mth (EUR) 9.90 downgrade SUSS from “Accumulate” to “Hold” and adjust the price target from Price low 12 mth (EUR) 4.77 EUR8.50 to EUR7.00. Abs. perf. 1 mth -8.8% Abs. perf. 3 mth -30.1% Strong performance in H1-16: In the first half of the year, SUSS has managed to Abs. perf. 12 mth 3.8% significantly improve not only its top line but also its profitability by monetizing its strong order intake generated in the previous quarters. Group’s sales have Market capitalisation (EURm) 118 increased by 25.2% with the second quarter leading the way (+47% yoy).
  • Hamburg – European Green Capital 2011

    Hamburg – European Green Capital 2011

    Hamburg – European Green Capital 2011 Final Report Published by: Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg Behörde für Stadtentwicklung und Umwelt Stadthausbrücke 8 20355 Hamburg www.hamburg.de/bsu Titel-Umweltprogramm-A3_eng.indd 1 05.03.13 11:10 Preface ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT As holder of the title of European Green Capital 2011, This document outlines the development of the Euro- Hamburg set itself the goals of developing sustaina- pean Green Capital 2011, and describes the approaches Dear citizens, ble environmental protection locally and also to raise taken to design the programme for the year. The orien- dear friends of the Green Capital! its profi le throughout Europe as a green metropolis in tation of the programme and the vast array of activities the vanguard of enlightened environmental practice. undertaken are illustrated using numerous examples. The European Commission awarded Hamburg the title continue to develop sustainably as a green waterfront In short, Hamburg achieved these goals. It is also to In addition to describing individual supporting projects, European Green Capital 2011, making it the second metropolis, particularly in times of population growth Hamburg’s credit that expenditure for achieving them their outcomes and impact are also recorded and, where ever city after Stockholm offi cially allowed to call itself and committed housing construction. The objective is was even under budget. Furthermore, the city is now possible, these are accompanied by statistical informa- European Green Capital. Not only is the title recognition a clear one: achieving a greener, fairer and stronger considered to be a showcase for the European Green tion. of Hamburg’s achievements in environmental protection, Hamburg.