The importance of fouling in the harbour of Ostend in 1964

GUIDO PERSOONE

Biogeografisch Instituut en Laboratorium voor Oekologie, Rijksuniversiteit Gent,

EXTRAIT: L'importance de la salissure dans le port d'Ostende en 1964. D6but juin 1964, plusieurs cadres dot6s de lames de nature diff6rente furent immerg6s dans ie port d'Ostende dans le but de d&ecter des diff6rences 6ventuelles dans la colonisation des substrats. Deux mois plus tard, l'exp6rience dut d65k &re interrompue, les cadres &ant enti~rement recouverts de boue. Ceci rendait toute analyse d'une lame ~ l'autre impossible. Nous avons trouv6 que cet 6norme envahissernent &ait dfi fi l'accumulation progressive d'un polych&e tubuleux: Poly- dora ciliata (JoHNsToN). La liste des organismes pr6sents dans la boue a 6t6 dress&.

Fig. 1: Frame with slides at the moment of immersion (June 1, 1964)

On June 1, 1964, during our investigations on fouling, we submerged severaI frames with slides (Fig. 1) in the harbour of Ostend, Belgium (Fig. 2), from the termi- nus of the car-ferry Ostend-. These devices, which were suspended by nylon cord from a ratt 1, were submerged to a depth of about 1.5 m. As test substrata we chose slides of glass, wood, iron, and iron coated with an anti- fouling paint. The dimensions of the slides were those of usual glass microscope slides

We are indebted to the Administration of the Marine and Interior Navigation who very kindly put the ra~ at our service. Fouling in the harbour of Ostend 445

(7.5 X 2.5 X 0.1 cm). The various materials used would allow the detection of differen- ces in the nature, speed and amount of colonization of substrata of different natures. Aflcer one month, on July 1, 1964, the first frame was taken out and the slides examined normally.

North ,_Sea N

Bredene f

Raft

Bass~ de chasse

Eede

Canal Ostend- Bruge5

Fig. 2: Harbour area of Ostend (Flanders, Belgium), showing the location of the raft from which frames with slides were suspended and submerged into the harbour water

When we took out the second frame, on August 1, 1964, we found, greatly to our surprises, that it was entirely covered with a black layer of mud of several centimeters in thickness, which had filled not only the spaces between adjacent slides but also the gap of about 10 cm between slides and the supporting frame plates (Fig. 3). At the moment of immersion the frame and counterpoise weighed about 8 kg, but when we took it out, it weighed more than 30 kg. Although a comparative qualitative and quantitative analysis of single slides was impossible, we nevertheless examined the mud covering the whole frame. In so doing, we found that the main overgrowth was due to the progressive accumulation of the tubes of a sedentary polychaete Polydora ciliata (JoRNsToN 1938). Between these tubes, which were composed of sand, mud particles, diatoms and planktonic detritus, we found a large number of sessile and free- living organisms belonging to several very different groups and constituting innumer- able micro-biocoenoses in the smallest interstices. Below is the list of the organisms which we were able to identify. 446 G. PERSOONE

Fig. 3: The same frame as shown in Figure 1 with counterpoise, two months later (August 1, 1964)

Protophyta. Schizophyceae: Microcystis sp., Oscillatoria sp. Schizomy- c etes (filamentous forms only): Beggiatoa alba (VAUCHER), Beggiatoa arachnoidea (AGARDH), Beggiatoa Ieptomitiformis TREVISAN, Gallionella [erruginea EHRENBERG, Leucothrix rnucor OERSTED, Microscilla marina PRINCSHEIM, Sphaerotilus natans KUT- ZINC, Thiothrix marina MOLISCH, VitreoscilIa sp., sp. div. Thallophyta. C h 1o r o p h y c e a e : Ankistrodesmus falcatus (CoI~DA) RALFS, En- teromorpha intestinalis LINK vat. compressa, Pediastrum duplex MEYEN, Scenedesmus acurninatus (LAGERHelM) CHODAT, Scenedesmus opoliensis RICHTEI~, Scenedesmus qua- drlcauda (TuRwN) DE BREBISSON. Bacillariophyceae: Achnanthes brevipes AGARDI~, Achnanthes Hauckiana GRUNOW, Actinocyclus Ehrenbergi RALFS, Actino- cyclus Ehrenbergi RALFS vat. Ralfsii, Actinoptychus splendens (SHAI)~3OLT) RALVS, Actinoptychus undulatus (BAILEY) RALFS, Amphora sp., Anomoeoneis sculpta (EHr.EN- BERG) CLEVE,Asterionella )aponica CLEVE, Aulacodiscus argus (EHRENBERG)SCHMIDT, A., Biddulphia aurita (LYNGBYE) BREBISSON-GODEY, Biddulphia granulata RowR, Biddulphia regia (ScHuLTZE) OSTENFELB,Biddulphia rhombus (EHRENB~RG) SCHMITH, W., Biddulphia sinensis GREWLLE, Campylosira cymbelliformis (ScHMII)T, A.) GRu- NOW, Cerataulus Smithii RA~Fs, Cocconeis ctandestina SCHMIDT, A., Cocconeis scutel- lure EHRENS~r.G, Coscinodiseus cinctus KUTZlNG, Coscinodiscus excentricus EHREN- BERG, Coscinodiscus Iineatus EHr.ENBERG, Coscinodiscus nitidus GREGORY, Coscino- discus oculis iridis EHRENBEI~G, Coscinodiscus radiatus EHRENBERG, CyclotelIa striata (KuTZlNO) GRtSNOXV, Cymatopleura elliptica (BI~EmSSON) SMITH, W., Cymatosira bel- gica GRUNOW, Cymbella clstula H~MVR., Cymbella sp., Diatoma vulgare BoRY, Di- ploneis bombus EHR~NBERG, Diploneis Crabro Em~ENBERG, Diploneis didyma EH~EN- Fouling in the harbour of Ostend 447

BERG, DipIoneis Smithi (BREBISSON) CLEVE, Diploneis splendida (GREGORY) CLEVE, Gomphonema constrictum EHRENBERG, Grammatophora hamulifera KUTZIN~, Gram- matophora oceanica (EI~R~N~rRC) GRuNow, Grammatophora serpentina (RALrS) E~t- REN13rRG, Melosira arenaria MooR~, Melosira islandica MULLER, Melosira Juergensi AGARDH, Melosira sulcata (E~tRENBERO)KUTZING, Melosira westii S~azTH,W., Navicu[a AGARDI~, MeIosira sucata (EI-~RENBZRG)KUTZINC, Melosira westii SMm~, W., Navicula anglica RALrS, Navicula cuspidata KUTZINC, Navicula distans (SMIT~, W.) VAN H~URCX, Navicula forcipata GREVILLE,Navicula monilifera CLrw, Navicula pere- grina (EHRENBERO) KiJTZINC, Navicula rhynchocephala KUTZING, Navicula specta- bilis GREGORY, Navicula viridula KUTZIN~, Navicula sp., Nitzschia apiculata (GRE- GORY) GRUNOW, Nitzschia constricta (KrJTZHqG)RALrS, Nitzschia lanceolata SMITH,W., Nitzschia navicularis (BREBISSON)GRUNOW, Nitzschia punctata (SMIT~, W.) GRUNOW, Nitzschia sigma SMITH, W., Nitzschia sp., Plagiogramma leve (GREGORY) RALFS, Pla- giogramma Van Heurckii GRiJNOW, Pleurosigma angulatum (Qu~) SMITH,W., Pleuro- sigma naviculaceum I)E BREBISSON, Pleurosgima sp., Podosira stelliger (BAILEY)MANN, Raphoneis amphiceros EHRENB~RG, Raphoneis belgica GRUNOW, Raphoneis surirella (EHRrNBEI

Vermes. Nem at o d a : Metaparoncholairnus campylocercus (DE MAN), Monhy- stera disjuncta BASTIAN, Monhystera parva (BASTIAN), Prochrornadorella germanica (BuTSCHLI), Theristus acer BASTIAN. P o i y c h a e t a : Fabricia sabelIa (EHI~ENB~RG), Nereis kerguelensis (MclNTosH), Polydora ciliata (JoHNsToN). R o t i f era: Colurella colurus (E~REN~ERG), Encentrum rnarinurn (DuJARDIN), Proales reinhardti (EHR~N- BERG. Crustacea. A m p h i p o d a : Corophium insidiosum CRAWFORD. C i r r i p e d i a : Balanus improvisus DARWIN', Elminius modestus DARWIN. Co pep o d a : Euterpina acuti]rons (DANA), Mesochra pygmaea (CLAus), Nitocra typica BoEc~:, Tisbe furcata (BAIRD). Dec a p o d a: Carcinus rnaenas (LINNE) (juvenile forms). The quantity and diversity of the species present sufficiently illustrate the com- plexity of the settling of organisms on submerged surfaces. Diatoms and ciliates were by far the most abundant of the groups present, at least as regards the number of spe- cies, consisting of up to 70 °/0 of the total number of organisms present (diatoms 50 %, ciliates 20 °/0). It is not improbable, howewer, when we consider the planktonic or benthic ori- gins of certain of the species cited, that they are present in the periphyton only by chance. Better knowledge of the trophic relations existing between these sessile and free- Iiving organisms, and their interrelationships with the plankton could be of great help in elucidating certain aspects of the biological and economic problem of fouling.

SUMMARY

1. Frames with slides of different nature were submerged in the harbour of Ostend, Belgium, on the first of June 1964, to detect qualitative and quantitative differen- ces in their fouling. 2. After two months the devices were covered with a black mud-layer of several centi- meters in thickness, which made a detailed analysis of the slides impossible. 3. Examination of this mud revealed that the tubulous polychaete Polydora ciIiata (JOHNSTON) was the primary cause of this enormous overgrowth. 4. A list of the species found in the mud is given.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We should like to thank Prof. Dr. F. EvrNs, Director of the "Biogeografisch Instituut en Laboratorium voor Oekologie" of the University of , and Dr. E. L~Louv, Director of the "Zeewetenschappelijk Instituut" of Ostend, for their advice and criticism during this investigation.