DOCSLIB.ORG

Resolution of the Thelymitra Variegata (Orchidaceae) Complex of Southern Australia and New Zealand

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Resolution of the Thelymitra Variegata (Orchidaceae) Complex of Southern Australia and New Zealand Resolution of the Thelymitra variegata (Orchidaceae) complex of southern Australia and New Zealand Jeffrey A. Jeanes Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne, Birdwood Avenue, South Yarra, Victoria 3141, Australia; e-mail: [email protected] Introduction Abstract Thelymitra J.R.Forst. & G.Forst. is a complex genus of orchids consisting The eight currently known taxa in of about 100 described species, several described natural hybrids and the Thelymitra variegata (Lindl.) F.Muell. complex are reviewed and at least 13 undescribed taxa. It is concentrated in higher rainfall areas of descriptions are presented for each. temperate Australia, but a few species occur in tropical north-eastern Thelymitra pulcherrima Jeanes, Australia, about 20 species occur in New Zealand (15 endemic) and a T. speciosa Jeanes and T. uliginosa few species occur in Indonesia, New Caledonia, New Guinea and the Jeanes from southwestern Western Philippines. Australia are described as new and illustrated. Thelymitra spiralis (Lindl.) This is one of a series of papers by the author reviewing the various F.Muell. var. pulchella Nicholls is morphologically distinct groups or complexes within Thelymitra. raised to species rank and given the During the course of my studies of the Thelymitra variegata (Lindl.) new name T. maculata Jeanes as the F.Muell. complex it became evident that several undescribed species epithet ‘pulchella’ is unavailable. The were present within the group. I take this opportunity to descibe these key diagnostic features relating to new species and review the entire complex. the size and colour of the perianth, the size, colour and shape of the There are a number of morphological features that, in combination, lateral lobes of the column and distinguish members of the T. variegata complex from all other leaf characteristics are elucidated. Thelymitra species. The leaf is usually variously auriculate at the base Information on distribution, habitat, and the blade is usually spirally twisted or at least somewhat curved. pollination biology, flowering time The leaf is also pubescent at the base with the hairs mainly on the veins and conservation status is given for all eight taxa. The main distinguishing and margins. The flowers usually have strong lustrous colours, often in features of Thelymitra apiculata (A.S. combinations of pink, red, yellow, mauve or purple. The column has a George) M.A.Clem. & D.L.Jones, rudimentary post-anther lobe with an arc of small digitate to globose T. matthewsii Cheesem., T. spiralis, glands arranged between the bases of the lateral lobes. The lateral T. variegata and the four new species lobes are well-developed and prominent, stipitate, suborbicular to are tabulated. A key is provided to narrow-elliptic and smooth to rugulose. The anther has an elongate distinguish all eight members of the T. variegata complex. terminal beak that is essentially an extension of the connective (see Fig. 1). Although six of the eight species in the complex are apparently Muelleria 27(2): 149-170 (2009) insect-pollinated, it is interesting to note that no floral odours have ever been attributed to the group. The likely mechanism for pollination is floral mimicry of other wildflowers (A. Brown pers. comm.) Muelleria 149 Muelleria rec 27-2 text.indd 149 1/07/2009 9:26:09 AM Jeanes Taxonomic history Hoffman and Brown (1998) followed their earlier work but also recognised two informal taxa, both as T. aff. The first two species in the group to be recognised, variegata, one from north of Perth, the other from the Thelymitra variegata and T. spiralis (Lindl.) F.Muell., south coast of Western Australia. Brown et al. (2008) were described by Lindley (1839–40) as Macdonaldia recognised and illustrated the seven Western Australian variegata Lindl. and M. spiralis Lindl. respectively species described in this paper, either by their currently (see Discussion for notes on Macdonaldia). Mueller accepted names or the manuscript names ascribed by (1865: pp 97–98) described T. porphyrosticta F.Muell. the current author. and commented that his new species was similar to T. variegata and T. spiralis thereby effectively creating these two new combinations. Bentham (1873) Discussion recognised only T. variegata while reducing T. spiralis Historically there has been significant confusion about and T. porphryosticta to synonymy. Mueller (1882) the correct application of names and the interpretation followed Bentham’s classification. Cheeseman (1911) of species within the Thelymitra variegata complex. described T. matthewsii Cheesem. from plants found on At least some of this confusion has persisted to the the North Island of New Zealand and later Rogers (1930), present day and has revealed itself in the many floras apparently unaware of Cheeseman’s species, described and orchid books published over the years. T. daltonii R.S.Rogers (as T. D’Altonii) from Halls Gap in Lindley (1839–40) described the first two species the Grampians, Victoria. Nicholls (1949) created four in the group as Macdonaldia variegata and M. spiralis varieties of T. spiralis—T. spiralis var. scoulerae Nicholls, respectively and distinguished these, and several T. spiralis var. pallida Nicholls, T. spiralis var. punctata other apparently unrelated species, from Thelymitra Nicholls and T. spiralis var. pulchella Nicholls—all of in having “the anther incumbent, and not parallel with which, as well as the type variety, are well illustrated the stigma”. The generic name Macdonaldia Gunn in colour in Nicholls (1951). George (1971) recognised ex Lindl. was coined by the notable plant collector all of Nicholls’ varieties except var. pulchella, which Ronald Gunn in honour of Mrs Smith née Macdonald he relegated to synonymy under the type variety. He an orchid collector from Tasmania. Hooker (1858) also relegated T. porphryosticta to synonymy under reduced Macdonaldia to a section within Thelymitra T. variegata and recognised T. matthewsii as occurring differing from his other sections in having the “Column in Western Australia. George (1984) described bifid at the apex, its sides not produced into toothed T. variegata var. apiculata A.S.George from plants or feathery arms. Anther projecting, generally more collected between Eneabba and Mogumber north or less granular or villous”. Mueller (1865, p. 98) did of Perth. Jones (1988) followed George (1971), but not recognise Macdonaldia and created the new in a brief entry in the supplement at the back of the combinations T. variegata and T. spiralis. In the same book T. variegata var. apiculata was raised informally article, Mueller (1865) described T. porphyrosticta to species rank as T. apiculata (A.S.George) M.A.Clem. from specimens collected by Maxwell near Salt & D.L.Jones. Following Clements’ study of the various River and Kalgan in Western Australia. Following type specimens, Clements and Jones in Clements my examination of the two type specimens at MEL, I (1989) formally raised T. variegata var. apiculata to have concluded that one (Kalgan River) is referable to species rank as T. apiculata. Otherwise Clements (1989) T. variegata (lectotypified below) the other (Salt River) recognised only T. matthewsii, T. spiralis var. spiralis, to T. spiralis (rejected syntype). A specimen at Kew (not T. spiralis var. pulchella and T. variegata as distinct seen by me) collected by Maxwell at Kalgan River is an taxa. Hoffman and Brown (1992) recognised only isolectotype (George 1971). Bentham (1873) recognised T. apiculata, T. spiralis and T. variegata as occurring in only T. variegata while relegating T. spiralis (and Western Australia, although they do allude to T. spiralis T. porphyrosticta) to synonymy therein. Bentham (1873) var. pulchella and the taxon from Western Australia that recognised Macdonaldia as a section within Thelymitra was equated by George (1971) with T. matthewsii as and defined it as “Column-wing broadly produced possibly being distinct entities worthy of recognition. behind the anther, but much shorter than it, and not 150 Vol 27(2) 2009 Muelleria rec 27-2 text.indd 150 1/07/2009 9:26:09 AM Muelleria rec27-2text.indd 151 Table 1. Taxonomic history of the T. variegata complex showing the names in Macdonaldia and Thelymitra used by various authors for the eight taxa recognised in the current treatment Muelleria Author Name used Lindley (1839–1840) M. variegata M. spiralis n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Lindley (1840) M. variegata M. spiralis n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Mueller (1865) T. variegata T. spiralis n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a T. porphryosticta T. porphryosticta Bentham (1873) T. variegata T. variegata n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Mueller (1882) T. variegata T. variegata n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Cheeseman (1911) T. variegata none T. matthewsii n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Rogers (1930) T. variegata T. spiralis T. D’Altonii n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Nicholls (1949), Nicholls T. variegata *T. spiralis var. spiralis T. matthewsii T. spiralis var. n/a n/a n/a n/a (1951) & Nicholls (1969) T. spiralis var. scoulerae pulchella T. spiralis var. pallida T. spiralis var. punctata George (1971) T. variegata T. spiralis var. spiralis T. matthewsii T. spiralis var. n/a T. matthewsii n/a n/a T. spiralis var. scoulerae spiralis T. spiralis var. pallida T. spiralis var. punctata T. spiralis var. pulchella Hoffman & Brown T. variegata T. spiralis none none T. sp T. matthewsii n/a n/a (1984) George (1984) T. variegata var. none none none T. variegata none n/a n/a variegata var. apiculata Jones (1988) T. variegata *T. spiralis var. spiralis T. matthewsii none T. variegata T. matthewsii n/a n/a T. spiralis var. scoulerae var. apiculata T. spiralis var. pallida T. apiculata variegata Thelymitra T.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Orchid Historical Biogeography, Diversification, Antarctica and The
    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2016) ORIGINAL Orchid historical biogeography, ARTICLE diversification, Antarctica and the paradox of orchid dispersal Thomas J. Givnish1*, Daniel Spalink1, Mercedes Ames1, Stephanie P. Lyon1, Steven J. Hunter1, Alejandro Zuluaga1,2, Alfonso Doucette1, Giovanny Giraldo Caro1, James McDaniel1, Mark A. Clements3, Mary T. K. Arroyo4, Lorena Endara5, Ricardo Kriebel1, Norris H. Williams5 and Kenneth M. Cameron1 1Department of Botany, University of ABSTRACT Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, Aim Orchidaceae is the most species-rich angiosperm family and has one of USA, 2Departamento de Biologıa, the broadest distributions. Until now, the lack of a well-resolved phylogeny has Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia, 3Centre for Australian National Biodiversity prevented analyses of orchid historical biogeography. In this study, we use such Research, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia, a phylogeny to estimate the geographical spread of orchids, evaluate the impor- 4Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity, tance of different regions in their diversification and assess the role of long-dis- Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, tance dispersal (LDD) in generating orchid diversity. 5 Santiago, Chile, Department of Biology, Location Global. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA Methods Analyses use a phylogeny including species representing all five orchid subfamilies and almost all tribes and subtribes, calibrated against 17 angiosperm fossils. We estimated historical biogeography and assessed the
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?
    Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology ISSN: 1409-3871 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica BACKHOUSE, GARY N. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology, vol. 7, núm. 1-2, marzo, 2007, pp. 28- 43 Universidad de Costa Rica Cartago, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44339813005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LANKESTERIANA 7(1-2): 28-43. 2007. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA GARY N. BACKHOUSE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Division, Department of Sustainability and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Australia [email protected] KEY WORDS:threatened orchids Australia conservation status Introduction Many orchid species are included in this list. This paper examines the listing process for threatened Australia has about 1700 species of orchids, com- orchids in Australia, compares regional and national prising about 1300 named species in about 190 gen- lists of threatened orchids, and provides recommen- era, plus at least 400 undescribed species (Jones dations for improving the process of listing regionally 2006, pers. comm.). About 1400 species (82%) are and nationally threatened orchids. geophytes, almost all deciduous, seasonal species, while 300 species (18%) are evergreen epiphytes Methods and/or lithophytes. At least 95% of this orchid flora is endemic to Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • ACT, Australian Capital Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Orchid Society of South Australia Journal November 2016
    Native Orchid Society of South Australia Inc. Journal Diuris calcicola One of new orchid species named in 2015 Photo: R. Bates November 2016 Volume 40 No. 10 Native Orchid Society of South Australia Journal November 2016 NOSSA WEBSITE https://nossa.org.au/ The Native Orchid Society of South Australia promotes the conservation of orchids through preservation of natural habitat and cultivation. Except with the documented official representation of the management President committee, no person may represent the Society on any matter. All native Vacant orchids are protected in the wild; their collection without written Government Vice President permit is illegal. Robert Lawrence Email: [email protected] Contents Secretary Title Author Page Rosalie Lawrence Bulletin Board 111 Email: [email protected] Vice President’s Report Robert Lawrence 112 Treasurer Thanks to volunteers at APS show Les Nesbitt 112 Christine Robertson October Meeting Review Robin Soergel 113 Email: [email protected] NOSSA Tuber Bank Jane Higgs 113 Editor Lorraine Badger Rockleigh Orchid Survey Peter Watts 114 Assistant Editor - Rob Soergel NOSSA Clare Field Trip Rosalie Lawrence 115 Email: [email protected] NOSSA Scott Creek CP Field Trip Rosalie Lawrence 116 Committee Seed Bank Report Les Nesbitt 117 Michael Clark Letters to the editor - erratum Lorraine Badger 117 Bob Bates Oct Orchid Picture Competition Rosalie Lawrence 118 Kris Kopicki Oct Benched Orchid/Sarcho Results Les Nesbitt 119 Photos David Hirst& others 120 Other Positions Membership Liaison Officer Robert Lawrence Life Members Ph: 8294 8014 Mr R Hargreaves† Mr G Carne Mrs T Bridle Email:[email protected] Mr H Goldsack† Mr R Bates Botanical Advisor Mr R Robjohns† Mr R Shooter Bob Bates Mr J Simmons† Mr W Dear Conservation Officer Mr D Wells† Mrs C Houston Thelma Bridle Ph: 8557 6553.
    [Show full text]
  • Flowering Times of Tasmanian Orchids: a Practical Guide for Field Botanists
    Flowering Times of Tasmanian Orchids: A Practical Guide for Field Botanists 0 Flowering Times of Tasmanian Orchids: A Practical Guide for Field Botanists FOREWORD This document fills a significant gap in the Tasmanian orchid literature. Given the inherent difficulties in locating and surveying orchids in their natural habitat, an accurate guide to their flowering times will be an invaluable tool to field botanists, consultants and orchid enthusiasts alike. Flowering Times of Tasmanian Orchids: A Practical Guide for Field Botanists has been developed by Tasmania’s leading orchid experts, drawing collectively on many decades of field experience. The result is the most comprehensive State reference on orchid flowering available. By virtue of its ease of use, accessibility and identification of accurate windows for locating our often-cryptic orchids, it will actually assist in conservation by enabling land managers and consultants to more easily comply with the survey requirements of a range of land-use planning processes. The use of this guide will enhance efforts to locate new populations and increase our understanding of the distribution of orchid species. The Threatened Species Section commends this guide and strongly recommends its use as a reference whenever surveys for orchids are undertaken. Matthew Larcombe Project Officer (Threatened Orchid and Euphrasia) Threatened Species Section, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water & Environment March 2008 DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY This document is available as a PDF file downloadable from the following websites: www.fpa.tas.gov.au www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au www.ecotas.com.au It may also be requested directly from the authors (see contact details below).
    [Show full text]
  • Nzbotsoc No 104 June 2011
    NEW ZEALAND BOTANICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER NUMBER 104 June 2011 New Zealand Botanical Society President: Anthony Wright Secretary/Treasurer: Ewen Cameron Committee: Bruce Clarkson, Colin Webb, Carol West Address: c/- Canterbury Museum Rolleston Avenue CHRISTCHURCH 8013 Subscriptions The 2011 ordinary and institutional subscriptions are $25 (reduced to $18 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). The 2011 student subscription, available to full-time students, is $12 (reduced to $9 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). Back issues of the Newsletter are available at $7.00 each. Since 1986 the Newsletter has appeared quarterly in March, June, September and December. New subscriptions are always welcome and these, together with back issue orders, should be sent to the Secretary/Treasurer (address above). Subscriptions are due by 28 February each year for that calendar year. Existing subscribers are sent an invoice with the December Newsletter for the next years subscription which offers a reduction if this is paid by the due date. If you are in arrears with your subscription a reminder notice comes attached to each issue of the Newsletter. Deadline for next issue The deadline for the September 2011 issue is 25 August 2011. Please post contributions to: Lara Shepherd Allan Wilson Centre Massey University Private Bag 11222 Palmerston North Send email contributions to [email protected]. Files are preferably in MS Word, with suffix “.doc” or “.docx”, or saved as RTF or ASCII. Macintosh files can also be accepted. Graphics can be sent as TIF, JPG, or BMP files; please do not embed images into documents.
    [Show full text]
  • NZ Orchid Key: a New Smartphone App for Identifying Native Orchids Murray Dawson1, Jeremy Rolfe, Michael Pratt and Ian St George
    NZ Orchid Key: a new smartphone app for identifying native orchids Murray Dawson1, Jeremy Rolfe, Michael Pratt and Ian St George Smartphones have rapidly become the device of choice for New Zealanders and the rest of the world. Their processing power, storage capacity, and portability have come of age, making it possible to run comprehensive productivity apps including identification tools. Uptake of this technology will continue to increase into the foreseeable future. It is timely then that a powerful app for identifying native orchids is now available for smartphones and tablets from the Android Google Play Store and Apple’s iTunes (Fig. 1A–E)2. E Fig. 1 Screenshots of the NZ Orchid Key C app. A, icon, illustrating the mauve sun orchid (Thelymitra malvina). B, start-up screen. C, feature (character) list. D, entity (species) list. E, part of a built-in species profile. This free app, called the NZ Orchid Key, is easy-to-use, has lots of A colourful photographs, and covers a wide array of plant characters3, including leaves, flowers, habitats, and distribution for identifying native orchids. Users choose whichever characters in the app match the orchid specimen they are identifying through a process of elimination. If a user needs help to understand what a particular character state means, they can bring up an explanation page for it. Each species within the app is supported by a descriptive profile, providing all the information needed to verify the identification. Species D profiles include links out to online B resources on native orchids – the 1 Landcare Research, PO Box 69040, Lincoln 7640, Canterbury, New Zealand; [email protected] 2 https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.lucidcentral.mobile.nz_orchid and https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/nz-orchid-key/ id1063192594?mt=8 3 In total, 43 characters and 212 character states were chosen for identifying native orchids in the key.
    [Show full text]
  • Thelymitra Species (Orchidaceae) and Their Hybrids in Western Australia
    Volume 15: 165–183 ELOPEA Publication date: 8 November 2013 T dx.doi.org/10.7751/telopea2013020 Journal of Plant Systematics plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/Telopea • escholarship.usyd.edu.au/journals/index.php/TEL • ISSN 0312-9764 (Print) • ISSN 2200-4025 (Online) Floral biology of large-flowered Thelymitra species (Orchidaceae) and their hybrids in Western Australia Retha Edens-Meier1, Eric Westhus2 and Peter Bernhardt2 1Department of Educational Studies, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA 63103 2Dept. of Biology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA 63013 Abstract Historically, only a few large flowered species in the genus Thelymitra were identified as obligate out-breeders. We compared floral presentation, pollen-pistil interactions, pollination ecology, and interspecific hybridization in two populations of T. macrophylla where its flowering periods overlapped with T. antennifera (Tenterden) and T. crinita (Lesmurdie) respectively. Pollen-pistil interactions were studied using glasshouse collections of T. crinita and T. macrophylla at KPBG. The number of flowers per inflorescence in T. macrophylla varied significantly between sites. Climatic conditions influenced flower opening and closing regimes differently in T. crinita vs. T. macrophylla. While all three Thelymitra species opened on warm, sunny mornings and closed by late afternoon, T. crinita at Lesmurdie was significantly more likely to open its perianth segments on cool days compared to the co-blooming, sympatric flowers of T. macrophylla. The floral lifespans of individual flowers of T. macrophylla and T. crinita were reduced significantly following application of Thelymitra pollen onto the stigmatic surface but were not reduced by pollinarium removal. Flowers of both species were self-compatible but neither species self-pollinated mechanically (autogamy).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: Orchid Potting Mixtures - an Abridged Historical Review 1
    Appendix: Orchid potting mixtures - An abridged historical review 1 T. J. SHEEHAN Introduction There is little doubt that potting media development over time has been the salvation of orchid growers (Bomba, 1975). When epiphytic orchids were first introduced into England and other European countries in the 18th century growers could not envision plants growing in anything but soil. '"Peat and loam' were good for everything and frequently became the mass murderers of the first generation of epiphytic orchids," Hooker is believed to have said around the end of the 19th century; England had become the graveyard of tropical orchids. Undoubtedly this was in reference to the concern individuals were having over the potting media problems. This problem also drew the attention of such noted individuals as John Lindley and Sir Joseph Paxton, as well as the Gardener's Chronicle, who noted that "The Rule of Thumb" had nothing to say about orchid growing; it was only effective in orchid killing (Bomba 1975). Fortunately, the ingenuity of growers solved the problem as innovative potting mixes evolved over the years. After visiting a number of orchid growing establishments it immediately becomes obvious to any orchid grower, professional or hobbyist, that orchids, both epiphytic and terrestrial, will grow in a wide variety of media. It has often been stated that epiphytic orchids can be grown in any medium except soil as long as watering and fertilization are adjusted to fit the mix being used. Ter­ restrial orchids seem to thrive in any medium that contains 40% or more organic matter. Reading cultural recommendations from the early days of orchid growing is most interesting and highly recommended.
    [Show full text]
  • 080058-92.02.002.Pdf
    'Jeqruq ',{ueq1y 'pusD{u"rd ,Isad sed,{1i(1runuruoc Jeqlo ss sB JoJ pqse^]sq pua {rsrruaq II I I[€^\ 'eprsaeo eq o1 ,(1e41 s4serc! (roloctsp^tp mdQocng) IuJa4 4ru"Jg ol JeuB€raql lsEe-qlnos-ls"e sJapuDerl 11e 'eepJ?I ',{ellBeq^{ sapnlcu! 1 esnecaq uorleSgsa,rur aaJs puB ol qlnos ol lsue'dnuuBN ot Jo Fl.qdBJSoeB erll sB ueJJ8^\ eql esoqc e/l\ lsorrrl€ r{uou anp spuoq l! eJaq,r Je^ry ,([auuoq aqt ol lculstpqns lBcruslog ut"ld Je^rU gocs egl do1 eq1 sso:cr '1sare1m Jo NRo-r{lnos-ls"e luraueSelour Jo eq oslr ueql 'ralry poo.r$lt?tg eq1 uo e8pug repusxelv ol ,{ru 1sq 1ua1dprru qJJBeseJcrlsuou Jo ,l\erleJ aqJ lsua-qlnos-g$os sun-r ifurprmoq prrvJu Jo rueqUou aql 'sn[L '(SS 'd 'uousrrrJoJr[ dn8uJlpl urorJ :OgOt preag) lueuoduoc cglualJs elqs[r8^? lseq luucgruErs € eq ol sesrea JoloJtslaqp e:eql\ eq1 q1m,(4snpw drqcpoo,{ aq1 eEeuuu pnB rolmour ? 'lueue8su"l u.{erp sr,{:epunoq ruaquou eql elq,t\ 'lse/rt pu qlnos IrlSru 11 leqf os I purl pu? uorts^lesuoC 'lseoc sgl ol "es aq1 .{q paprmoq sr lI qmos eqt uo Jo lueulredaq eqt ,{q pelJnpuoJ Bllerlsny {*qlv ot e8pJg alsqumlulq-urrnoe-I eqt uo dn?u1ge1 lsea-rllnos u1 luerua8yuvu lseJoJ Jo lcedur eq1 uo qcJBoser uo.5 u{ 0o€ re^o spuelxe lcFlslpgns uerr"d\ eql Jo ?rterler B ol uorpquluoa v sa ,{luzuud esoP s3^\ IroA\ eqJ qcJReseJamlry ro3 sequoud 'errqsadsred 'EcefoJd luuor8a.r e ur seulluepr puE rIcJBeseJ tuaJrnc ol sJeJeJ ur"{ ol pernJuoo queuodwoc esoql go 'BroU '(9961 lseloJ lueuecqd r"lncsBl u,llou{ eql 3o 1s1 e quaserd 11 s8q lculslPgns uerrB eloq^1 eql JoJ P€lqBua \ p-rceg rnras) lclrtspgns lBcruslog
    [Show full text]
  • Australasian Orchid Diversification in Time and Space: Molecular Phylogenetic Insights from the Beard Orchids (Calochilus, Diurideae)
    Australian Systematic Botany, 2018, 31, 389–408 ©CSIRO 2018 https://doi.org/10.1071/SB18027 Supplementary material Australasian orchid diversification in time and space: molecular phylogenetic insights from the beard orchids (Calochilus, Diurideae) Katharina NargarA,B,E, Sarah MolinaA,B, Natascha WagnerC, Lars NauheimerA, Claire MicheneauA, and Mark A. ClementsD,E AAustralian Tropical Herbarium, James Cook University, GPO Box 6811, Cairns, Qld 4878, Australia. BNational Research Collections Australia, CSIRO, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. CDepartment of Systematics, Biodiversity and Evolution of Plants, Albrecht Haller Institute for Plant Sciences, Georg August University of Goettingen, Untere Klarspüle 2, D-37073 Goettingen, Germany. DCentre for Australian National Biodiversity Research, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. EAustralian National Botanic Gardens, GPO Box 1777, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. FCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Australian Systematic Botany ©CSIRO 2018 https://doi.org/10.1071/SB18027 Table S1. Plant material used in the study and GenBank accession numbers Herbarium abbreviations according to Index Herbariorum. Superscript numbers denote GenBank numbers for sequences generated in other studies. 1, Clements et al. (2002); 2, Nauheimer et al. (2018); 3, Clements et al., unpubl. data; 4, A. Perkins and P. Weston, unpubl. data Species Voucher details DNA number GenBank accession numbers accD atpA atpB atpE atpF-p1 atpF-p2 atpH atpI ccsA Calochilus caesius PERTH: Barrett, R.L. CNS_G05068 MH815014 MH661261 MH815015 MH815016 MH815017 MH815018 MH815019 MH815020 MH815021 D.L.Jones 6273 Calochilus campestris CANB: Jones, D.L. CNS_G06021 – MH661267 MH661276 MH685837 MH661290 MH661305 MH661320 MH661335 MH661350 R.Br. 8586 Calochilus cupreus R.S. CANB: Murfet, D.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Banksia Road Dardanup Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Survey and Level 1 Fauna Assessment
    Banksia Road Dardanup Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Survey and Level 1 Fauna Assessment November 2014 Prepared for Transpacific Industries Group Ltd Astron Environmental Services 129 Royal Street East Perth WA 6004 Phone: (08) 9421 9600 Fax: (08) 9421 9699 Report Reference: 21135-14-BISR-1Rev1_151022 Email: [email protected] Banksia Road Dardanup Level 2 Vegetation and Flora Survey and Level 1 Fauna Assessment Prepared for Transpacific Industries Group Ltd Job Number: 21135-14 Reference: 21135-14-BISR-1Rev1_151022 Revision Status Rev Date Description Author(s) Reviewer M. Love N. Cadd A 08/12/2014 Draft Issued for Client Review V. Clarke J. Oates M. Love N. Cadd 0 02/10/2015 Final Issued for Information V. Clarke J. Oates Revised Final Issued for M. Love 1 22/10/2015 R. Archibald Information V. Clarke Approval Rev Date Issued to Authorised by Name Signature Transpacific Industries Group A 09/12/2014 S. Pearse (Cleanaway) Transpacific Industries Group 0 02/10/2015 S. Pearse (Cleanaway) Transpacific Industries Group 1 22/10/2015 S. Pearse (Cleanaway) © Copyright 2015 Astron Environmental Services Pty Ltd. All rights reserved. This document and information contained in it has been prepared by Astron Environmental Services under the terms and conditions of its contract with its client. The report is for the clients use only and may not be used, exploited, copied, duplicated or reproduced in any form or medium whatsoever without the prior written permission of Astron Environmental Services or its client. Transpacific Industries Group Ltd
    [Show full text]