DOCSLIB.ORG

The Renormalization Group

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Renormalization Group Notes on the Renormalization Group Chris Ripken Institute for Mathematics, Astrophysics and Particle Physics (IMAPP) Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands [email protected] version 6.1418, November 4, 2016 Glossary << ê ⋅ ; ⋅ ëF<< Inner product on F 9 < ê ⋅ ; ⋅ ëF< Inner product on F 12 cl.J/ Classical field generated by source J 13 d Spacetime dimension 25 v.f/ Variation of f with respect to v 9 F<< Classical field space 9 F Field space 11 F< Source space 12 f̄(Δ) Kinetic function 35 f̃.s/ Laplace transform of kinetic function 35 Γ Christoffel symbol 33 G Dual map F<< → F< 13 Γk Effective average action 16 Γ Effective action 14 G Metric on finite space 22 G Supermetric on metric fluctuations 33 G*1 Dual map F< → F<< 13 ̄g Background metric 35 g Dynamical metric 33 Inclusion map of F into F<< 13 k Scale parameter 15 M Spacetime manifold 33 Quantum measure on field space 11 NS Number of scalar fields 25 NV Polynomial order of scalar potential 28 $ Gauge parameter in supermetric 33 Chris Ripken, [email protected] 3 Notes on the Renormalization Group Qj [W ] Mellin transform 27 Rk(Δ) Cutoff function 16 R.0/.z/ Cutoff shape function 26 S Action functional 11 ΔSk Cutoff action 16 Σ -algebra on field space 11 ./ Source associated to the classical field 14 Θ(z/ Heaviside Theta-function 27 ̄ ⃗2 Vk. / Dimensionful scalar potential 25 ⃗2 Vk. / Dimensionless scalar potential 27 .n/ vk Taylor coefficients dimensionless scalar potential 28 W Generating functional of connected correlation 10 functions Faddeev-Popov ghost 33 Z Partition function 12 4 November 4, 2016 Acronyms EAA Effective Average Action 16 EH Einstein-Hilbert 35 FRGE Functional Renormalization Group Equation 15 GFP Gaussian fixed point 28 IR infrared 16 NGFP Non-Gaussian fixed point 28 QCD Quantum Chromodynamics 15 QFT Quantum Field Theory 7 RG Renormalization Group 15 RRT Riesz Representation Theorem 9 UV ultraviolet 16 Chris Ripken, [email protected] 5 Notes on the Renormalization Group 6 November 4, 2016 Chapter 2 The renormalization group equation 2.1 Fields and the path integral Indeterminacy and randomness play a fundamental role in physics. For the experimentalist, this may mean that measurements may not be 100~ precise, due to imperfections in measuring apparatuses. However, indeterminacy also plays a role in the shortcoming of our theories about nature. For instance, the sheer size of a physical system may be the cause for us being unable to predict the exact state of a system. This is where statistical physics come into play. Using statistical techniques, we may be able to make predictions on averages of systems, expectation values, and uncertainties thereof. Furthermore, randomness is an intrinsic property of nature. In quantum mechanics, two observables that are not commensurable cannot be measured at the same time with absolute precision. Quantum uncertainty can be described using the same techniques as in statistical physics. This leads to a probalistic formulation of physics. The path integral formalism is especially adapted to the indeterministic nature of quantum mechanics. 2.1.1 Field space In this section, we will review the basics of the path integral formalism. We will try to be as mathematically rigourous as possible; however, well defining a path integral is still an open question in mathematics. The path integral formalism provides a more or less well-behaved description of a so-called quantum field theory. The dynamical objects in such a theory are called fields. We denote the set of fields by F; typically, an element of F is denoted by ' Ë F. In general, we do not assume a topology or vector space structure on F. We do require that F is equipped with a -algebra. This is denoted by Σ. Integration over field space is then defined by requiring the existence of a measure on .F; Σ). The measure gives rise to a volume element d. We assume that the volume element can be written in the following form: *S['] d.'/ = D' e , (2.1.1) where the functional S : F → R is called the action functional. The symbol D' denotes typically the Lebesgue measure on F. Note however that, if F is infinite dimensional, this measure does Chris Ripken, [email protected] 11 Notes on the Renormalization Group not exist. In that case, we interpret this formula as a purely formal expression. In the following, we will not refer to the action functional again. 2.1.2 Path integrals The measure enables us to take integrals over field space F. In particular, we may integrate over the entire field space. This gives rise to the partition function Z, defined by Z = .F/ = d.'/. (2.1.2) ÊF In the case where the partition function is normalized to 1, the measure is a probality measure. If the partition function is not normalized, but finite, we can always obtain a probability measure by defining d¨ = Z*1d. In general, F has no differentiable or linear structure. In order to probe the probability measure, we define a source current to be an element of the dual of F. Definition 2.1.1 (Source space). Let F be a field space with measure . We define source space F< as the space of square integrable functions F → C. The space of sources can be equipped with a Hilbert space structure. An example of an inner product is given by the L2 inner product: êJ;KëF< = d.'/J[']K['], (2.1.3) Ê for J;K Ë F<. Furthermore, we assume that F< is separable. This means that there exists a n countable basis ^d `nËN. A nice property of F< is that it is a Banach space; thus, we have a differentiable structure as discussed in section 1.1.3. A source current J Ë F< modifies the probability distribution of the theory. We define the generating functional of the n-point correlators by Z[J] = d.'/eJ[']. (2.1.4) Ê For A; J Ë F<, we define the expectation value of A in the presence of J by *1 J['] êAëJ = Z[J] d.'/e A[']. (2.1.5) Ê We now define the generating functional W [J] as the logarithm of Z[J]: W [J] = log Z[J]. (2.1.6) Equivalently, W [J] is specified by the relation eW [J] = Z[J]. (2.1.7) In the following, we assume that W is twice continuously differentiable. 12 November 4, 2016 Chapter 2. The renormalization group equation Definition 2.1.2 (Classical field space). Let F< be a Hilbert space. We define classical field space F<< as the continuous dual of F<. In other words, F<< is given by the set of continuous linear functionals F< → C. F<< is again a Hilbert space, with inner product defined by ê, ëF<< = sup ð[J]ð (2.1.8) JËF< for Ë F<<. By the RRT, classical field space is isometrically isomorphic to source space. We will denote the isomorphism F< → F<< by G*1. Explicitly, for J;K Ë F<, we define *1 ̄ . G .J/[K] = J;K F< (2.1.9) Note that the complex conjugation of J ensures that G*1 is linear. The inverse of this map is denoted by G; this is given by the defining relation ( ) [J] = G./;J , (2.1.10) F< for J Ë F<, Ë F<<. As a result, we can rewrite [J] as *1 . [J] = , G .J/ F<< (2.1.11) Field space has a natural inclusion in classical field space; we denote this inclusion map by : F → F<<; .'/[J] = J[']. (2.1.12) The generating functional W [J] gives rise to the so-called classical field. This is a map cl: F< → F<<, given by the equivalent definitions cl.J/[K] = êKëJ = K W [J]. (2.1.13) The equivalence is proven in the following lemma. Lemma 2.1.3. The two definitions in (2.1.13) are equivalent. Proof. Let J;K Ë F<. The functional derivative of W is then given by 1 1 Z[J + "K] K W [J] = lim .W [J + "K]* W [J]/ = lim log . (2.1.14) "→0 " "→0 " Z[J] Expanding Z[J + "K] up to first order in " gives J['] 2 Z[J + "K] = Z[J] + " d.'/K[']e + O " ; (2.1.15) Ê inserting this into the expression for K W [J] gives 1 2 K W [J] = lim log 1 + " K J + O " . (2.1.16) "→0 " ê ë Expanding the logarithm up to first order in " allows us to read off the limit " → 0. This results in K W [J] = êKëJ , (2.1.17) as was to be shown. Chris Ripken, [email protected] 13 Notes on the Renormalization Group Conversely, a classical field may be uniquely associated to a source. If we assume that W is strictly convex, then a classical field Ë F<< uniquely determines a source ./Ë F<. The source ./ is then given by ./ = arg sup ^[J]* W [J]` , (2.1.18) JËF< where arg sup denotes the argument J Ë F< such that the expression attains its supremum. The effective action Γ: F<< → R is now defined by the Legendre transform of W [J]: Γ[] = sup ^[J]* W [J]` < JËF (2.1.19) = [./] * W [./]. The effective action obeys a quantum equation of motion that makes the role of J as a source explicit. Proposition 2.1.4. Let the effective action Γ[] be defined as in (2.1.19). Then for all , Ë F<<, the effective action obeys the relation Γ[] = [./]. (2.1.20) < Proof.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TASI 2008 Lectures: Introduction to Supersymmetry And
    TASI 2008 Lectures: Introduction to Supersymmetry and Supersymmetry Breaking Yuri Shirman Department of Physics and Astronomy University of California, Irvine, CA 92697. [email protected] Abstract These lectures, presented at TASI 08 school, provide an introduction to supersymmetry and supersymmetry breaking. We present basic formalism of supersymmetry, super- symmetric non-renormalization theorems, and summarize non-perturbative dynamics of supersymmetric QCD. We then turn to discussion of tree level, non-perturbative, and metastable supersymmetry breaking. We introduce Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model and discuss soft parameters in the Lagrangian. Finally we discuss several mech- anisms for communicating the supersymmetry breaking between the hidden and visible sectors. arXiv:0907.0039v1 [hep-ph] 1 Jul 2009 Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Motivation..................................... 2 1.2 Weylfermions................................... 4 1.3 Afirstlookatsupersymmetry . .. 5 2 Constructing supersymmetric Lagrangians 6 2.1 Wess-ZuminoModel ............................... 6 2.2 Superfieldformalism .............................. 8 2.3 VectorSuperfield ................................. 12 2.4 Supersymmetric U(1)gaugetheory ....................... 13 2.5 Non-abeliangaugetheory . .. 15 3 Non-renormalization theorems 16 3.1 R-symmetry.................................... 17 3.2 Superpotentialterms . .. .. .. 17 3.3 Gaugecouplingrenormalization . ..... 19 3.4 D-termrenormalization. ... 20 4 Non-perturbative dynamics in SUSY QCD 20 4.1 Affleck-Dine-Seiberg
    [Show full text]
  • Renormalization and Effective Field Theory
    Mathematical Surveys and Monographs Volume 170 Renormalization and Effective Field Theory Kevin Costello American Mathematical Society surv-170-costello-cov.indd 1 1/28/11 8:15 AM http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/surv/170 Renormalization and Effective Field Theory Mathematical Surveys and Monographs Volume 170 Renormalization and Effective Field Theory Kevin Costello American Mathematical Society Providence, Rhode Island EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Ralph L. Cohen, Chair MichaelA.Singer Eric M. Friedlander Benjamin Sudakov MichaelI.Weinstein 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 81T13, 81T15, 81T17, 81T18, 81T20, 81T70. The author was partially supported by NSF grant 0706954 and an Alfred P. Sloan Fellowship. For additional information and updates on this book, visit www.ams.org/bookpages/surv-170 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Costello, Kevin. Renormalization and effective fieldtheory/KevinCostello. p. cm. — (Mathematical surveys and monographs ; v. 170) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-0-8218-5288-0 (alk. paper) 1. Renormalization (Physics) 2. Quantum field theory. I. Title. QC174.17.R46C67 2011 530.143—dc22 2010047463 Copying and reprinting. Individual readers of this publication, and nonprofit libraries acting for them, are permitted to make fair use of the material, such as to copy a chapter for use in teaching or research. Permission is granted to quote brief passages from this publication in reviews, provided the customary acknowledgment of the source is given. Republication, systematic copying, or multiple reproduction of any material in this publication is permitted only under license from the American Mathematical Society. Requests for such permission should be addressed to the Acquisitions Department, American Mathematical Society, 201 Charles Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02904-2294 USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Regularization and Renormalization of Non-Perturbative Quantum Electrodynamics Via the Dyson-Schwinger Equations
    University of Adelaide School of Chemistry and Physics Doctor of Philosophy Regularization and Renormalization of Non-Perturbative Quantum Electrodynamics via the Dyson-Schwinger Equations by Tom Sizer Supervisors: Professor A. G. Williams and Dr A. Kızılers¨u March 2014 Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Introduction................................... 1 1.2 Dyson-SchwingerEquations . .. .. 2 1.3 Renormalization................................. 4 1.4 Dynamical Chiral Symmetry Breaking . 5 1.5 ChapterOutline................................. 5 1.6 Notation..................................... 7 2 Canonical QED 9 2.1 Canonically Quantized QED . 9 2.2 FeynmanRules ................................. 12 2.3 Analysis of Divergences & Weinberg’s Theorem . 14 2.4 ElectronPropagatorandSelf-Energy . 17 2.5 PhotonPropagatorandPolarizationTensor . 18 2.6 ProperVertex.................................. 20 2.7 Ward-TakahashiIdentity . 21 2.8 Skeleton Expansion and Dyson-Schwinger Equations . 22 2.9 Renormalization................................. 25 2.10 RenormalizedPerturbationTheory . 27 2.11 Outline Proof of Renormalizability of QED . 28 3 Functional QED 31 3.1 FullGreen’sFunctions ............................. 31 3.2 GeneratingFunctionals............................. 33 3.3 AbstractDyson-SchwingerEquations . 34 3.4 Connected and One-Particle Irreducible Green’s Functions . 35 3.5 Euclidean Field Theory . 39 3.6 QEDviaFunctionalIntegrals . 40 3.7 Regularization.................................. 42 3.7.1 Cutoff Regularization . 42 3.7.2 Pauli-Villars Regularization . 42 i 3.7.3 Lattice Regularization . 43 3.7.4 Dimensional Regularization . 44 3.8 RenormalizationoftheDSEs ......................... 45 3.9 RenormalizationGroup............................. 49 3.10BrokenScaleInvariance ............................ 53 4 The Choice of Vertex 55 4.1 Unrenormalized Quenched Formalism . 55 4.2 RainbowQED.................................. 57 4.2.1 Self-Energy Derivations . 58 4.2.2 Analytic Approximations . 60 4.2.3 Numerical Solutions . 62 4.3 Rainbow QED with a 4-Fermion Interaction .
    [Show full text]
  • 14 Renormalization 1: Basics
    14 Renormalization 1: Basics 14.1 Introduction Functional integrals over fields have been mentioned briefly in Part I de- voted to path integrals.† In brief, time ordering properties and Gaussian properties generalize immediately from paths to field integrals. The sin- gular nature of Green’s functions in field theory introduces new problems which have no counterpart in path integrals. This problem is addressed by regularization and is briefly presented in the appendix. The fundamental difference between quantum mechanics (systems with a finite number of degrees of freedom) and quantum field theory (systems with an infinite number of degrees of freedom) can be labelled “radiative corrections”: In quantum mechanics “a particle is a particle” character- ized, for instance, by mass, charge, spin. In quantum field theory the concept “particle” is intrinsically associated to the concept “field.” The particle is affected by its field. Its mass and charge are modified by the surrounding fields, its own, and other fields interacting with it. An early example of this situation is Green’s calculation of the motion of a pendulum in fluid media. The mass of the pendulum in its equation of motion is modified by the fluid. Nowadays we say the mass is “renor- malized.” The remarkable fact is that the equation of motion remains valid provided one replaces the “bare” mass by the renormalized mass. Green’s example is presented in section 14.2. Although regularization and renormalization are different concepts, † Namely in section 1.1 “The beginning”, in section 1.3 “The operator formalism”, in section 2.3 “Gaussian in Banach spaces”, in section 2.5 “Scaling and coarse- graining”, and in section 4.3 “The anharmonic oscillator”.
    [Show full text]
  • Relativistic Wave Equations Les Rencontres Physiciens-Mathématiciens De Strasbourg - RCP25, 1973, Tome 18 « Conférences De : J
    Recherche Coopérative sur Programme no 25 R. SEILER Relativistic Wave Equations Les rencontres physiciens-mathématiciens de Strasbourg - RCP25, 1973, tome 18 « Conférences de : J. Leray, J.P. Ramis, R. Seiler, J.M. Souriau et A. Voros », , exp. no 4, p. 1-24 <http://www.numdam.org/item?id=RCP25_1973__18__A4_0> © Université Louis Pasteur (Strasbourg), 1973, tous droits réservés. L’accès aux archives de la série « Recherche Coopérative sur Programme no 25 » implique l’ac- cord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utili- sation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright. Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques http://www.numdam.org/ Relativistic Wave Equations R. Seiler Institut für Theoretische Physik Freie Universität Berlin Talk présentée at the Strassbourg meeting^November 1972 (Quinzième rencontre entre physiciens théoriciens et mathé­ maticiens dans le cadre de recherche coopérative sur pro­ gramme n° 25 du CNRS). III - 1 - Introduction In general quantum field theory, formulation of dynamics is one of the most important yet most difficult problems. Experience with classical field theories - e.g. Maxwell theory - indicatesthat relativistic wave equations, in one form or another are going to play an important role. This optimism is furthermore supported by the analysis of models, e. g. Thirring model ^ 4 1 or <j theory both in 2 space time dimensions, and of renormalized perturbation theory. Asa step towards full quantum theory one might consider the so called external field problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Extracting Supersymmetry-Breaking Effects from Wave-Function
    CERN-TH/97-145 hep-ph/9706540 Extracting Supersymmetry-Breaking Effects from Wave-Function Renormalization G.F. Giudice1 and R. Rattazzi Theory Division, CERN, CH-1211, Gen`eve 23, Switzerland Abstract We show that in theories in which supersymmetry breaking is communicated by renor- malizable perturbative interactions, it is possible to extract the soft terms for the observ- able fields from wave-function renormalization. Therefore all the information about soft terms can be obtained from anomalous dimensions and β functions, with no need to fur- ther compute any Feynman diagram. This method greatly simplifies calculations which are rather involved if performed in terms of component fields. For illustrative purposes we reproduce known results of theories with gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking. We then use our method to obtain new results of phenomenological importance. We calcu- late the next-to-leading correction to the Higgs mass parameters, the two-loop soft terms induced by messenger-matter superpotential couplings, and the soft terms generated by messengers belonging to vector supermultiplets. CERN-TH/97-145 June 1997 1On leave of absence from INFN, Sez. di Padova, Italy. 1 Introduction Theories in which supersymmetry breaking is mediated by renormalizable perturbative inter- actions have an interesting advantage over the gravity-mediated scenario. This is because in these theories the soft terms are in priciple calculable quantities, very much like g − 2inQED. Gauge-mediated models [1, 2], in particular, have also a strong motivation as they elegantly solve the supersymmetric flavour problem. In the simplest version of these theories, the gaugino and sfermion masses arise respectively from one- and two-loop finite diagrams.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Supersymmetry N = 1 SUSY Effective Actions Contents 1
    Notes on Supersymmetry N = 1 SUSY Effective Actions Zhong-Zhi Xianyu∗ Institute of Modern Physics and Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China Contents 1 Introduction1 2 Effective Action in Perturbation Theory2 2.1 Non-renormalization theorem.........................2 3 Beta Function of Non-Abelian Gauge Theory7 3.1 Instanton calculus and NSVZ β function...................7 3.2 Effective action: Wilsonian vs. 1PI......................8 3.3 Rescaling anomaly of vector superfield....................8 4 Nonperturbative Corrections to Effective Action8 1. Introduction In preceding note we learned that the most general renormalizable field theory equiped with N = 1 susy can be expressed fully in terms of chiral superfield Φ subjected to the y y constraint Dα_ Φ = 0, its conjugation Φ , and the vector superfield V satisfying V = V . The Lagrangian of this theory can be written as Z Z τ 2 α 2 2 ¯ y 2V L = 2Re d θ tr W Wα + d θd θ Φ e Φ 16πik (1) Z m g + 2Re d2θ λΦ + Φ2 + Φ3 ; 2 3 ∗E-mail: [email protected] 1 Notes by Zhong-Zhi Xianyu Begin on 2013/08/01, last updated on 2013/09/08 where θ 4πi τ = YM + (2) 2π g2 is the generalized gauge coupling, k is the normalization factor from tr (T aT b) = kδab with T a's being generators of gauge group. However, we are also interested in nonrenormalizable theories. For instance, when we are concerned with low energy dynamics of the theory, the most powerful approach is to write down the most general Lagrangian compatible with the symmetry of the theory, including both renormalizable and nonrenormalizable terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1902.04941V1 [Gr-Qc] 13 Feb 2019 Contents
    Effective field theory for gravitational radiation in scalar-tensor gravity Adrien Kuntza, Federico Piazzaa and Filippo Vernizzib a Aix Marseille Univ, Universit´ede Toulon, CNRS, CPT, Marseille, France b Institut de physique th´eorique,Universit´eParis Saclay, CEA, CNRS 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France Abstract A light scalar degree of freedom, as the one possibly responsible for the accelerated expansion of the Universe, could leave observable traces in the inspiral gravitational wave signal of binary systems. In order to study these effects, we extend the effective field theory formalism of Goldberger and Rothstein to minimal scalar-tensor theories of gravity. This class of models is still very broad, because the couplings of the scalar to matter are far less constrained than those a massless spin-2 field. In most of the paper we focus on conformal couplings. Using the effective field theory approach, we discuss the emergence of violations of the strong equivalence principle even in models that exhibit universality of free fall at the microscopic level. Our results on the conservative dynamics of the binary and its power emitted in gravitational and scalar radiation agree with those obtained with the standard post-Newtonian formalism. We also compare them to more recent work. Finally, we discuss the implications of considering a disformal coupling to matter. arXiv:1902.04941v1 [gr-qc] 13 Feb 2019 Contents 1 Introduction3 1.1 The gravitational action . .4 1.2 The point-particle action . .5 1.3 Outline . .6 2 Non-Relativistic Scalar-Tensor Theory6 2.1 Lengthscales in binary systems . .7 2.2 Integrating out fluctuating fields .
    [Show full text]
  • The Relativistic Electron Wave Equation P
    europhosycs BULLETIN OF THE EUROPEAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY news J.A. Volume 8 Number 10 October 1977 The Relativistic Electron Wave Equation P. A. M. Dirac An abridged version of the lecture celebrating both the 75th. birthday of Professor Dirac and the 50th. anniversary of the publication of this fundamental equation of Nature, given on July 4 at the Conference on Particles Physics in Budapest. The full text will be published in the Conference Proceedings. Before the period that I want to The outline of Heisenberg’s method I was thinking over Heisenberg’s talk about, that is to say in the early was to set up a theory dealing with ideas, concentrating on the non-com­ 1920s, we had a period of frustration. only observable quantities. These mutation, and it occured to me rather We had the theory of the Bohr orbits observable quantities fitted into ma­ by accident that there was really a which worked very well for some sim­ trices, so he was led to consider ma­ great similarity between the commu­ ple problems, essentially for those pro­ trices, and he had the idea of consi­ tator of two quantities that do not com­ blems where only one electron was dering the matrix as a whole instead mute and the Poisson bracket which playing an important role. People of just dealing with particular matrix we have in classical mechanics. As a were trying to extend the theory to elements. Dealing with matrices one result of this similarity, the equations deal with several electrons, for exam­ is then directed to non-commutative in the new mechanics with non-com­ ple to the spectrum of helium, where algebra.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Loops and Renormalization
    1 Loops and renormalization Tree-level processes are fully specified by the Lagrangian. Loop corrections to tree-level processes arise at higher orders of perturbation theory. For instance, the graph in Fig. 1 is an example of a loop correction to fermion pair production. Figure 1: Loop correction to fermion pair production. The part of the theory that deals with loop effects is renormalization. This note gives an introduction to the idea of renormalization and its physical implications. 1.1 Basic ideas and examples In this section we introduce general principles of renormalization and describe two specific examples, the renormalization of the electric charge and the electron’s anomalous magnetic moment. In the next section we extend the discussion by introducing the renormalization group. 1.1.1 General principles While the Lagrangian specifies interaction processes at tree level, the method of renor- malization is required to treat processes including loops. A symptom that renormalization is required is that Feynman graphs with loops may give rise to integrals containing divergences from high-momentum regions. Renormaliza- tion allows one to give meaning to the occurrence of these ultraviolet divergences. Ultraviolet power counting provides the basic approach to renormalization. For a Feynman graph involving a loop integral of the form N(k) d4k , (1) Z M(k) 1 consider the superficial degree of divergence defined as D =(powers of k in N + 4) (powers of k in M) . (2) − If D 0, the integral is ultraviolet divergent. A first way of characterizing a theory as “renormalizable”≥ is that the number of ultraviolet divergent amplitudes is finite.
    [Show full text]
  • Renormalization Group Methods
    Renormalization Group Methods Porter Williams It is a truism, in physics if not in philosophy, that in order to study phys- ical behavior at a particular scale one is best served by using degrees of free- dom defined at (or suitably near) that scale. If one wants to study the classi- cal behavior of a simple fluid on relatively long length scales ( 10−10m), for example, the appropriate degrees of freedom to use to describe the fluid are two continuous fields, the mass density ρ(x) and the velocity field v(x). This despite the fact that the fluid itself is constituted by a large collection of dis- crete, atomic constituents, which in turn have their own subatomic structure. Remarkably, one can do a tremendous amount of empirically successful fluid dynamics ignoring almost entirely the more \fundamental," discrete descrip- tion of the fluid and modeling its long-distance behavior using “effective" continuum degrees of freedom. Even in purportedly fundamental physics the truism holds. For example, consider quantum chromodynamics, the theory that describes the physics of quarks and gluons interacting via the strong force. Although hadrons (such as protons and neutrons and pions) interact via the strong force and are (in a rather complicated sense) \composed" of quarks and gluons, a considerable amount of low-energy nuclear physics proceeds perfectly well by modeling nuclear processes in ways that ignore those \fundamental" quark and gluon degrees of freedom entirely, modeling physical processes in terms of “effective" hadronic degrees of freedom. If one wants to model the low- energy scattering of pions off of a fixed nucleon target, for example, one is better off eschewing any attempt to describe the scattering in terms of the 1 \fundamental" quark and gluon degrees of freedom in favor of an “effective" description in terms of pions and nucleons.
    [Show full text]
  • Path Integrals with Μ1(X) and Μ2(X) the first and Second Moments of the Transition Probabilities
    1 Introduction to path integrals with ¹1(x) and ¹2(x) the ¯rst and second moments of the transition probabilities. v. January 22, 2006 Another approach is to use path integrals. We will use Phys 719 - M. Hilke the example of a simple brownian motion (the random walk) to illustrate the concept of the path integral (or Wiener integral) in this context. CONTENT ² Classical stochastic dynamics DISCRETE RANDOM WALK ² Brownian motion (random walk) ² Quantum dynamics The discrete random walk describes a particle (or per- son) moving along ¯xed segments for ¯xed time intervals ² Free particle (of unit 1). The choice of direction for each new segment ² Particle in a potential is random. We will assume that only perpendicular di- rection are possible (4 possibilities in 2D and 6 in 3D). ² Driven harmonic oscillator The important quantity is the probability to reach x at 0 0 ² Semiclassical approximation time t, when the random walker started at x at time t : ² Statistical description (imaginary time) P (x; t; x0; t0): (3) ² Quantum dissipative systems For this probability the following normalization condi- tions apply: INTRODUCTION X 0 0 0 0 P (x; t; x ; t) = ±x;x0 and for (t > t ) P (x; t; x ; t ) = 1: Path integrals are used in a variety of ¯elds, including x stochastic dynamics, polymer physics, protein folding, (4) ¯eld theories, quantum mechanics, quantum ¯eld theo- This leads to ries, quantum gravity and string theory. The basic idea 1 X is to sum up all contributing paths. Here we will overview P (x; t + 1; x0; t0) = P (»; t; x0; t0); (5) the technique be starting on classical dynamics, in par- 2D h»i ticular, the random walk problem before we discuss the quantum case by looking at a particle in a potential, and where h»i represent the nearest neighbors of x.
    [Show full text]