<<

AS7009, 2008 Outline Lecture 5  Cosmological parameters  Measuring distances  Luminosity distance  Angular -diameter distance  Standard candles  Magnitude system  Supernova cosmology  Covers chapter 7 in Ryden

Cosmological parameters I Cosmological parameters II

Remember these ones? An endless number of subpopulations can Ω M: Matter be introduced if necessary… Ω R: Radiation Ω : Cold Ω Ω CDM Λor DE : or dark energy Ω : Baryons Ω (or just Ω): Sum of the other Ωs bar tot Ω : Stars κ: Curvature (+1,0,-1) – related to Ω stars tot Ω CMBR : CMBR photons R0: Curvature radius of the w : Equation of state of dark energy Ων: Neutrinos DE Ω H0: Hubble parameter at current time BH : Black holes -1 -1 Ω (often expressed as h: H 0=100 h km s Mpc ) Robots : Robots (see exercises) t0: Current

Deceleration parameter I A few others … Definition:  q0: Deceleration parameter σ  8: Root -mean -square mass fluctuation  aa   a  amplitude in spheres of size 8h -1 Mpc = − && = − && q0  2   2   τ: Electron -scattering optical depth  a  =  aH  = & t t0 t t0  η: Inhomogeneity parameter

 ns: Slope of matter power spectrum > s q0 0 ⇒ Expansion slowing down (decelerat ion)  zreion : of < q0 0 ⇒ Expansion speeding up (accelerat ion)  Neff : Effective number of neutrino species

Not really covered in this course…

1 Deceleration parameter II Cosmological distances I Acceleration equation → = 1 Ω + q0 ∑ w 0, 1( 3w) 2 w Radiation, matter & Λ → 1 q = Ω + Ω − ΩΛ 0 R 0, 2 M 0, 0, Benchmark model: → Ω ≈ Ω ≈ Ω ≈ D(z) depend on cosmological parameters R 0, ,0 M 0, ,3.0 Λ 0, 7.0 ⇒ Ω Ω H0, M, Λ etc. can be extracted from measurements of D(z) q ≈ − 55.0 Acceleration! Problem: In an expanding and/or curved Universe, there are 0 many ways to define D(z)

Cosmological distances II Luminosity distance I In a static, flat Universe, the brightness  Proper distance of a light source is determined by Remember : Length of spatial geodesic at time t if scale the inverse-square law . factor is fixed at a(t). This is sometimes referred to as ”distance as measured by a rigid ruler ” However, in an expanding The proper distance is important for theoretical reasons, and/or curved Universe, this is not the case. but impossible to measure in practice, since you cannot halt the expansion of space!  Other distance definitions: Inverse square law :  Luminosity distance LS  Angular size distance f = S 4πr 2 In a static Euclidian (flat) Universe, these would all be equivalent – but in our Universe, they’re not!

Luminosity distance II Luminosity distance III Why does the inverse square law not hold at cosmological distances?  Geometry : Definition :  Affects the area that photons are spread out 2/1 over   =  L  dL    4πf 

 Expansion:  Photons lose energy due to wavelength shift  Time signals stretched by redshift

2 Luminosity distance IV Luminosity distance V

Radiation, matter and Λ: Flat, Λ only + z Benchmark = c 1( z) dz dL ∫ H Ω + 3 − Ω + Ω − + 2 +Ω 0 0 M 1( z) ( M Λ )(1 1 z) Λ Flat, matter only Approximation in a nearly flat Unive rse : dL  −  ≈ c +1 q0 dL z1 z H0  2  Note : z → 0 ⇒ c d ≈ z (Hubble's law) L H 0 3 6 0 z

Angular -diameter distance I Angular -diameter distance II

In a static, flat Universe, objects of a fixed length Definition : appear smaller if they are = l Problematic as a further away. dA In an expanding and/or θ cosmological probe… curved Universe, One can show that : No good standard this is not the case. rods/yardsticks have yet been discovered = dL dA 2 at cosmological distances Static, Euclidian space : (1 + z) l l θ l d = ≈ for small angles tan( θ ) θ

Angular diameter distance III How to use the luminosity distance Bizarre: After a certain redshift, distant objects start as a probe of cosmology appearing larger in the sky – not smaller! Remember : Flat, Λ only   2/1 =  L  dL    4πf 

c 1( + z) z dz d = dA L ∫ 3 2 H 0 Ω 1( + z) − (Ω + Ω − )(1 1+ z) + Ω Benchmark 0 M M Λ Λ

Flat, matter only  Observables : z and f  If you know the intrinsic luminosity L of a light source , you can get information on H , Ω , ΩΛ… 0 3 6 0 M  Standard candles: Light sources for which L can z be derived through some independent means

3 Standard candles I: Standard candles must be observable Cepheid Variables at high to be useful

 Radially pulsating stars  Period → Luminosity (Absolute Magnitude) → Distance  Applicable out to ~ 30 Mpc (slightly beyond the Virgo galaxy cluster)

10000 Luminosity Luminosity (Lsolar ) 100

1 10 50 Time Period (days)

Standard candles II: Suggestion for Literature Exercise: Supernovae Type Ia Gamma-ray bursts as probes of cosmology Peak luminosity  Useful at least out to almost constant! z~2 (~3000 Mpc ) -19

 Probably formed in Absolute -17 binary system in magnitude which matter from a -15

red giant falls onto a -12 white dwarf 0 100 300 Days after maximum  May be detectable up to z~10  But: Are they good standard candles?

The magnitude system I The magnitude system II In astronomy, one often measures the flux of light sourcs using photometry – i.e. the flux received within a well-defined filter

Filter profiles Apparent magnitude :   = − f m 5.2 log   Spectrum of  freference  light source

4 The magnitude system III Complications I: K -correction Luminosities are often given as absolute magnitudes, i.e. the apparent magnitude a light source of intrinsic luminosity L For two identical objects at different z, a given filter would have at a fixed distance of 10 pc probes different parts of the spectrum → Absolure magnitude : (and different physical processes) Low-z magnitudes cannot be directly   = − L compared to high-z magnitudes M 5.2 log    Lreference  z=0 z=high Flux Flux   B B dL m = M + 5log   10 pc  Wavelength Wavelength   dL m = M + 5log   + 25 1 Mpc 

Complications I: K -correction Complications II: Dust extinction

K-correction: An attempt to correct from observed (redshifted) to intrinsic (non-redshifted) spectrum What are these black stripes? = − mintrinsic mobs k(z)

Often a complicated function, based on assumptions about the shape of the source spectrum…

Wavelength dependence of Wavelength dependence of dust extinction II dust extinction dust extinction II Before contact with dust Radio After contact IR Flux with dust Optical UV Wavelength Star Radiation Dust = − λ Photons at infrared and radio wavelengths are less mintrinsic mobs A( ) affected by dust than optical or ultraviolet photons are Extinction correction

5 Supernova cosmology I

Supernova cosmology II Supernova cosmology III

ΩΛ > 0! Major breakthrough!

A few other probes of Combined constraints cosmological parameters

 CMBR Lecture 7  Large scale structure Lecture 10 Benchmark model Ω =0.3, Ω =0.7  Galaxy clusters M Λ Suitable for -1 -1 H0=72 km s Mpc  Weak gravitational lensing literature exercises  Redshift shifts over time

6 Suggestion for Literature Exercise: Gravitational lensing Weak gravitational lensing

Distortion of background images by foreground matter

More on this also in the dark matter lecture… Unlensed Lensed

Dark energy and other alternatives The Big Rip I with equation of state w <-1 → → Alternatives to a cosmological constant : Dark energy grows over time Alternative fate of the Universe in which ≠  Dark energy with constant w -1 currently bound structures will get  Dark energy with w(z ) disassembled in the future  Modification of Friedman equation , for instance due to:  Alternative theories of gravity  Additional spatial dimensions Suitable for literature  Breakdown of cosmological principle exercises  Non -standard models of dark matter

The Big Rip II

Caldwell et al. (2003)

7