Historic Resources Survey, City Of
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
HHistoricistoric Resources SurveySurveySurvey City of Oshkosh Report prepared for City of Oshkosh Oshkosh, Wisconsin Report prepared by May 2006 Acknowledgements Mead & Hunt, Inc. would like to thank the following state and local organizations and individuals for assisting us with this study: Susan Kepplinger of the City of Oshkosh Planning Department, Mara Munroe with the Oshkosh Public Library, Scott Cross of the Oshkosh Public Museum, and Joe DeRose and Jim Draeger of the State Historic Preservation Office of the Wisconsin Historical Society. Cover photograph: Oshkosh Brewery Aerial, 1953. Courtesy of the Oshkosh Public Museum. Table of Contents Table of Contents Page Abstract .................................................................................................. A-i 1. Introduction.....................................................................................1 2. Methodology ...................................................................................5 A. Initial research ..........................................................................5 B. Survey and documentation ......................................................5 C. Evaluation.................................................................................6 (1) Individual properties .........................................................6 (2) Historic districts ................................................................6 D. 1981 survey reevaluation .........................................................7 E. Survey report............................................................................8 3. Historical Themes...........................................................................9 A. Settlement ................................................................................9 B. Architecture ............................................................................12 C. Transportation ........................................................................20 D. Commerce..............................................................................21 E. Religion ..................................................................................22 F. Education ...............................................................................24 G. Recreation ..............................................................................25 H. Industry...................................................................................25 4. Previous Identification Efforts ....................................................29 5. Survey Results..............................................................................31 6. Recommendations .......................................................................33 A. National Register listing – newly identified.............................33 B. National Register listing – previously identified as not eligible ....................................................................................40 C. National Register listing – previously identified as eligible ....41 District Summary Survey Forms.............................................45 D. Future historic preservation recommendations......................73 Bibliography............................................................................................75 X:\15073-00\05001\TECH\RPTS\WPC\060530A.DOC i Appendices A Identified Survey Areas and Properties B National Register Criteria for Evaluation C Reevaluation Results D Surveyed Properties E Local and State Preservation Contacts Tables 1 Reevaluation Results.....................................................7 2 National Register-Listed Properties.............................29 X:\15073-00\05001\TECH\RPTS\WPC\060530A.DOC ii Abstract Abstract In 2005, Mead & Hunt, Inc. (Mead & Hunt) conducted an intensive survey to identify historic resources of the City of Oshkosh (City) that have the potential for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register). The survey focused on selected areas of the city and property types identified by the City. The survey also reevaluated the National Register eligibility of 154 properties previously identified in the 1981 Intensive Historic Resource Survey for the City of Oshkosh. During the fieldwork phase of the project, Mead & Hunt identified and surveyed a total of 483 individual properties for inclusion in the Wisconsin Historic Properties Database (WHPD). During the evaluation phase, five historic districts, 24 individual properties, and four religious complexes were found to meet National Register Criteria and are recommended for listing in the National Register. The survey report documents the results of historical research, field investigations, and evaluation of surveyed properties. The report highlights the following elements of this effort: • Survey methodology. • Criteria used to evaluate eligibility of properties in the City. • A discussion of historic themes related to surveyed properties, based on Cultural Resource Management in Wisconsin, prepared by the Wisconsin Historical Society (WHS). • Summary of previous survey efforts within the delineated survey areas, including properties that have been listed in the National Register. • Description and evaluation of properties and historic districts recommended as eligible for the National Register. • Future historic preservation recommendations. X:\15073-00\05001\TECH\RPTS\WPC\060530A.DOC A-i Section 1 Introduction 1. Introduction The City of Oshkosh (City) retained Mead & Hunt, Inc. (Mead & Hunt) to conduct an intensive survey of selected areas and property types and prepare a report highlighting survey results and recommendations concerning properties eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register). The survey was completed in 2005 by principal investigator Emily Pettis with assistance from Shannon Dolan. Pettis meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for Architectural History and History, which qualifies her to make National Register eligibility recommendations. The City identified specific areas and specific property types for inclusion in the survey. The Historic Survey Boundaries map identifies the defined survey areas. Some of the survey areas overlapped with each other and some of the specific property types were included within the defined survey areas. The City also invited the public to identify properties for inclusion in the survey. A complete list of the survey areas, property types, and properties identified by the public is included in Appendix A. The intensive survey achieved its goals of identifying properties that possess architectural or historical significance and reevaluating resources documented in previous surveys. The completion of this survey report supports the City’s ongoing preservation initiatives by providing additional historic contexts and identifying recommendations for National Register listing. In addition to the intensive survey, Mead & Hunt completed a reevaluation of 154 previously surveyed properties to assess National Register eligibility. The reevaluation effort was limited to exterior field inspection, with the exception of five properties, which received interior review or intensive-level research to determine eligibility. X:\15073-00\05001\TECH\Rpts\WPC\060530A.doc 1 MA RQUE TTE AVE. HARRISON Doemel (CTH "AA") Point HEA RTHS TONE LIBBEY AVE. BAVARIAN CT. HAMILTON 2400 MINERVA MORGAN AVE. WEATHERSTONE BACON CT. DR. AVE. ALPINE CT. HICKORY LN. ST. PARKSIDE BOWEN ST. ST. 2300 GENEVA GENEVA ST. COMET ST. AVE. WISCONSIN E. SMITH KAITLY NN W. SMITH AVE. WHITE HICKORY WINCHESTER CT. GREENWOOD CT. AVE. SWA N CT. PARKSIDE DR. ST. DOCTORS CLIFFVIE W CT. ST. ALLEN AVE. ST. FIRESIDE CAMELOT 2200 DR. RIVERSIDE WILSON AVE. CR. ALDEN AVE. CT. CT. MA LLA RD AVE. LN. ST. E. LINWOOD AVE. ROOSEVELT AVE. 2100 ONTARIO VIOLA AVE. 2000 CEMETERY W. LINWOOD AVE. DR. ST. ST. VERNON ASHLA ND W. GRUENWALD AVE. 1900 CT. OAK ST. HICKORY AVE. E. GRUENWALD AVE. HAZEL ST. SHE LTER COLUMBIA GROVE ST. STILLWELL AVE. EVANS ST. FAIRVIEWST. 1700 JACKSON ST. 1800 1900 2000 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1800 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 RIVER MILL RD. CRANE ST. 300 SHE RIDAN OLIVE ST. 200 MITCHE ST. LL W. MURDOCK AVE. 100 0 0 100 PLYMOUTH 300 200 900 800 700 600 500 400 1500 1400 1300 1200 1100 1000 1900 1800 1700 1600 E. MURDOCK AVE. HURON AVE. ST. HOBBS AVE. DR. HURON ST. HOLLISTER ST. 1700 HURON VETERANS TRL.* AVE. GRABER RAINBOW DR. HICKORY STANLEY AVE. CT. CHESTNUT ST. E. BENT AVE. DOEMEL 1600 CLARKS ST. AVE. NORTHP OINT REPP AVE. CT. W. BENT AVE. WHITE SWAN MOUNT CLIFFVIE W CATHERINE AVE. 1500 JEFFERSON HARRISON ST. DR. CENTRA ST. L LAMAR W. BURDICK ST. E. NEVADA AVE. OAKS ALGOMA BLVD. ELMWOOD AVE. TRAIL* CEDAR ST. AVE. WALNUT ST. BEECH S T. ST. 1400 GRAHAM AVE. DR. CONGRE SS AVE. E. CUSTER AVE. W. REE D ANNEX 1300 ARB ORETUM FOX ST. SHORT ELMWOODAVE. AVE. AVE. E. TENNESSEE AVE. LAWNDALE SUMMIT W. ME NOMINEE AVE. AVE. AVE. 1200 CT. MAPLE AVE. PUNHOQUA FAIRVIEW ST. FAIRVIEW MONROE ST. POWERS ST. EASTMAN ST. BROAD ST. E. NEW YORK AVE. KENTUCKY ST. AMES POINT TITAN ONTARIO ST. SPRUCE W. WESTERN ST. NIMROD CT. FILLMORE AVE. GOSS CT. LIBERTY ST. GEHRES CT. Millers SARATOGA BUCHANAN AVE. W. NEW YORK AVE. ST. BALDWIN AVE. GARFIELD VINE AVE. 1100 AVE. Bay HIGH ARTHUR AVE. AVE. MERRILL ST. OSTERTAG PL. PYLE LOCUST ST. k PROSPECT BONG CT. e AVE. E. MELVIN AVE. VANBUREN AVE. 1000 W. MELVIN AVE. e AVE. r C TYLER AVE. ROCK PL. SIEWERT 900 SCOTT AVE. TRL. CHERRY S T. STERLING AVE.