Know the Law Now!
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
How to Get to Singapore Nursing Board by Public Transport (81 Kim Keat Road, #08-00, Singapore 328836)
How to get to Singapore Nursing Board by Public Transport (81 Kim Keat Road, #08-00, Singapore 328836) Bus Stop Number: 52411 (Blk 105 ) Bus Stop Number: 52499 (St. Michael Bus Terminal ) Jalan Rajah (After Global Indian International School) Whampoa Road Bus services : 139, 565 Bus Services : 21, 124, 125, 131, 186 Bus Stop Number: 52419 (Curtin S’pore ) Bus Stop Number: 52099 (Opp. NKF) Jalan Rajah Kim Keat Road Bus Services : 139 Bus Services : 21, 124, 125, 131, 139, 186, 565 How to get to Singapore Nursing Board by MRT and Bus Nearest MRT Station How to get to Singapore Nursing Board by MRT and Bus Toa Payoh Alight at NS19 – Toa Payoh MRT Station (Use Exit B) MRT Station Take Bus 139 at Toa Payoh Bus Interchange (52009) (NS19) Alight at Bus Stop Number: 52411 (Blk 105) – Jalan Rajah Number of Stops: 5 Walk towards NKF Centre (200m away) OR Alight at Bus Stop Number: 52099 (opp. NKF) –Kim Keat Road Number of Stops: 9 Cross the road and walk towards NKF Centre (50m away) Novena MRT Alight at NS20 – Novena MRT Station (Use Exit B2) How to get to SNB (Public Transport) 1 June 2011 Page 1 of 4 Nearest MRT Station How to get to Singapore Nursing Board by MRT and Bus Station Walk down towards Novena Church. (NS20) Walk across the overhead bridge, and walk towards Bus Stop Number: 50031 – Thomson Road (in front of Novena Ville). Take Bus 21 or 131 Alight at Bus Stop Number: 52499 (St. Michael Bus Terminal) –Whampoa Road Number of Stops: 10 Walk towards NKF Centre (110m away) Newton MRT Alight at NS21 – Newton MRT Station (Use Exit A) Station Take Bus 124 at Bus Stop Number: 40181 – Scotts Road (heading towards Newton (NS21) Road). -
Advancing Justice: Expanding the Possibilities State Courts | Annual Report 2017 One Judiciary
ADVANCING JUSTICE: EXPANDING THE POSSIBILITIES STATE COURTS | ANNUAL REPORT 2017 ONE JUDICIARY ANNUAL REPORT 2017 SHARED VISION Inspiring public trust and confidence through an effective and accessible justice system MISSION Serving society with quality judgments, timely dispute resolution and excellent court services CORE VALUES Fairness Accessibility Independence, Integrity, Impartiality Responsiveness CONTENTS Foreword by The Honourable the Chief Justice 6 Message from the Presiding Judge 8 Organisation Chart 10 ADVANCING JUSTICE: EXPANDING THE POSSIBILITIES 11 Workplan 2017 Initiatives 12 ICMS for Accused Persons 13 Victim Assistance Scheme 13 Guidebook for Accused-in-Person 14 Updated Publications on Personal Injury and Fatal or Motor Accident Cases 14 Employment Claims Tribunals 15 Community Justice and Tribunals System & Short Mediation and Hearing 15 On-site Psychological Services 16 Family-connect @ State Courts 16 State Courts-NUS Clerkship Programme 17 Executive Leadership Programme for Court and Tribunal Administrators 18 IFCE: State Courts of Singapore Model 18 A Day in Court 19 Public Talk on Resolving Employment Disputes 19 Sentencing Conference 2017 20 State Courts Towers Progress 21 INSPIRING PUBLIC TRUST AND CONFIDENCE 23 Dashboard 24 Caseload Profile 25 Significant Cases: Criminal Justice Division 27 Significant Cases: Civil Justice Division 28 Significant Cases: Community Justice and Tribunals Division 29 Significant Cases: State Courts Centre for Dispute Resolution 30 Organisational Excellence 31 Service Excellence 32 Results of State Courts Surveys 33 Local Awards and International Profile 34 Visits by Distinguished Guests 36 OUR PEOPLE 37 Nurturing Our People 39 Staff Engagement: State Courts Conversation 2020 40 Our People: 2017 41 OUR VOLUNTEERS 42 Working Hand-in-Hand 43 GIVING BACK TO SOCIETY 44 Giving Back to Society 45 ANNUAL REPORT 2017 6 STATE COURTS, SINGAPORE 2017 was a significant year for the Courts as we took FOREWORD steps to respond to global trends in technology and globalisation. -
Merdeka Generation Package $100 Top-Up Benefit
Merdeka Generation Package $100 Top-Up Benefit The Merdeka Generation (MG) One-Time $100 Top-Up will be available from 01 July 2019 onwards. Apart from the top-up locations at the MRT stations and bus interchanges, temporary top-up booths at selected Community Clubs/ Centres will be set up to provide even greater convenience to our MGs with their top ups. a) TransitLink Ticket Offices Operating Hours TransitLink Ticket Offices Public Location Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Holidays 1 Aljunied MRT Station * 1200 - 1930 Closed 2 Ang Mo Kio MRT Station 0800 - 2100 3 Bayfront MRT Station (CCL)* Closed 1200 - 2000 4 Bedok Bus Interchange 1000 - 2000 1000 - 1700 Closed 5 Bedok MRT Station * 1200 - 2000 6 Bishan MRT Station * 1200 - 1930 Closed 7 Boon Lay Bus Interchange 0800 - 2100 8 Bugis MRT Station 1000 - 2100 9 Bukit Batok MRT Station * 1200 - 1930 10 Bukit Merah Bus Interchange * 1200 - 1930 11 Changi Airport MRT Station ~ 0800 - 2100 12 Chinatown MRT Station ~@ 0800 - 2100 13 City Hall MRT Station 0900 - 2100 14 Clementi MRT Station 0800 - 2100 15 Eunos MRT Station * 1200 - 1930 1200 - 1800 Closed 16 Farrer Park MRT Station * 1200 - 1930 17 HarbourFront MRT Station ~ 0800 - 2100 Updated as of 2 July 2019 Operating Hours TransitLink Ticket Offices Public Location Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Holidays 18 Hougang MRT Station * 1200 - 1930 19 Jurong East MRT Station * 1200 - 1930 20 Kranji MRT Station * 1230 - 1930 # 1230 - 1930 ## Closed## 21 Lakeside MRT Station * 1200 - 1930 22 Lavender MRT Station * 1200 - 1930 Closed 23 Novena MRT Station -
Juvenile Justice: a Study of National Judiciaries for The
JUVENILE JUSTICE: A STUDY OF NATIONAL JUDICIARIES FOR THE UNITED NATIONS ASIA AND FAR EAST INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRIME AND THE TREATMENT OF OFFENDERS A focus on Singapore and selected comparisons with California (USA) & Australia Joseph Ozawa* I. SINGAPORE When Singapore is mentioned in various parts of the world, there are certain predicable responses, often focusing on Singaporean laws or the judicial system. “Oh, the place that makes chewing gum illegal!” or “The country that caned Michael Fey for spraying graffiti!” or “The nation that makes it a crime not to flush a toilet!” However, despite these sometimes amusing though derisive attributions, taking decisive action on minor infractions was subsequently popularized and advocated by James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling in their 1982 treatise entitled, “broken windows.” Here Wilson and Kelling argued that actually tolerating broken windows will actually result in larger and more extensive crimes. A successful anti-crime strategy is to fix problems when they are still minor. New York City government used much of Wilson’s and Kelling’s theory in “cleaning up” New York streets. Whatever the end product of “small laws,” Singapore has 12 times the population of Vancouver but just half the crime rate. It is difficult finding many recent international crime comparisons and as researchers know, comparing crime rates is filled with methodological problems. However, in general, in 1993, the juvenile delinquency rate in Singapore was rated at 538 per 100,000 persons whereas Japan was rated 1,220 per 100,000 and the USA 5,460 per 100,000. -
A Voice of Our Own: Rethinking the Disabled in the Historical Imagination of Singapore Zhuang Kuan Song National University of S
A VOICE OF OUR OWN: RETHINKING THE DISABLED IN THE HISTORICAL IMAGINATION OF SINGAPORE ZHUANG KUAN SONG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2010 A VOICE OF OUR OWN: RETHINKING THE DISABLED IN THE HISTORICAL IMAGINATION OF SINGAPORE ZHUANG KUAN SONG (B.A.(Hons.), National University of Singapore) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2010 “I long to accomplish a great and noble task, but it is my chief duty to accomplish small tasks as if they were great and noble…” Helen Keller, 1880-1968 Author, Political Activist, Lecturer Deaf Blind Person Acknowledgements This research had been a long, arduous but entirely rewarding process. Coming to this stage has not been easy, and apologies are in order for those whom I had inadvertently or accidentally offended throughout this process. Throughout the two years of my postgraduate studies, I learnt much about myself and about the lives of people with disabilities. Understanding the mentalities of disabled people and how their lives are structured has become second nature to me and I hope had made me a better person. This research would not have been possible without the support from my supervisor, Dr Sai Siew Min. She had been my academic supervisor since my Bachelors’ and had given me guidance since. Dr Sai had been encouraging and I thank her for the patience she had shown while I was formulating the direction of the research. Consulting her had been a breeze for she would gladly put aside whatever she was doing, whenever I entered her office without prior appointment. -
Current Members of the Commonwealth Secretariat Arbitral Tribunal
Current members of the Commonwealth Secretariat Arbitral Tribunal Mr Arthur Faerua (Vanuatu), member, 1 June 2012 - 31/5/2016; 1/6/2016 Education 2010, University of South Pacific, Emalus Campus, Vanuatu Vanuatu mediation Practise Course • Skills in Conducting Mediation and Dispute Resolution • Certified by Supreme Court Vanuatu as an accredited Mediator 2004, University of South Pacific, Emalus Campus, Vanuatu Graduate Certificate in Tertiary Teaching (GCTT) • Skills in Delivery and Learning in a tertiary environment • Student-Oriented Learning for Pacific students 1997 – 1998, University of Waikato, New Zealand Masters of Law (LLM) • International Trade Law • Focus on Pacific Constitutions and economic development September - December 1996, University of Waikato, New Zealand Professional Legal Studies Admission as Barrister & Solicitor in the High Court of New Zealand 1992-1995, University of Waikato, New Zealand Bachelor of Laws (LLB) International Trade & Commercial Law Short-Term Trainings & Instructionals November 2008, Commodities Branch, Division on International Trade in Good and Services & Commodities, UNCTAD & Vanuatu National Codex Committee 1 National Capacity Building Workshop on Commodities- related Trade and Development, Poverty Reduction, Food Safety Standards and Quality Requirements, and Food Laws and Technical Regulations Trade & Food Safety Standards March 2005, WHO/FAO Training Course on the Management of Codex Contact Point and the National Codex System Capacity Building in Codex, Food Regulation and International -
Sixth Schedule Consequential and Related
SIXTH SCHEDULE Section 430 CONSEQUENTIAL AND RELATED AMENDMENTS TO OTHER WRITTEN LAWS First column Second column 1. Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority Act (Chapter 2A, 2005 Ed.) Section 33(1) Insert, immediately after the words “the Second Schedule may”, the words “, with the authorisation of the Public Prosecutor,”. 2. Administration of Muslim Law Act (Chapter 3, 2009 Ed.) Section 43 Delete the words “Chapter XXXII of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cap. 68)” in paragraph ( e) and substitute the words “Division 1 of Part XXI of the Criminal Procedure Code 2010”. 3. Animals and Birds Act (Chapter 7, 2002 Ed.) Section 67 Delete subsection (2) and substitute the following subsection: (2) For the purpose of section 151 of the Criminal Procedure Code 2010, on receiving the complaint in writing and signed by the Director- General or an authorised officer, the Magistrate must proceed to issue a summons or warrant in accordance with section 153 of the Criminal Procedure Code 2010. 4. Arms and Explosives Act (Chapter 13, 2003 Ed.) Section 40 (i) Delete the words “written sanction” in subsection (1) and substitute the word “consent”. (ii) Delete the word “sanction” wherever it appears in subsections (2), (3) and (4) and substitute in each case the word “consent”. (iii) Delete the section heading and substitute the following section heading: Consent 5. Banishment Act (Chapter 18, 1985 Ed.) Section 8(4) (i) Delete the words “section 43 of the Criminal Procedure Code” and substitute the words “section 116 of the Criminal Procedure Code 2010”. (ii) Delete the marginal reference “Cap. 68.”. 6. Banking Act (Chapter 19, 2008 Ed.) Section 73 (i) Delete the word “Attorney-General” and substitute the words “Public Prosecutor”. -
Participating Merchants Address Postal Code Club21 3.1 Phillip Lim 581 Orchard Road, Hilton Hotel 238883 A|X Armani Exchange
Participating Merchants Address Postal Code Club21 3.1 Phillip Lim 581 Orchard Road, Hilton Hotel 238883 A|X Armani Exchange 2 Orchard Turn, B1-03 ION Orchard 238801 391 Orchard Road, #B1-03/04 Ngee Ann City 238872 290 Orchard Rd, 02-13/14-16 Paragon #02-17/19 238859 2 Bayfront Avenue, B2-15/16/16A The Shoppes at Marina Bay Sands 018972 Armani Junior 2 Bayfront Avenue, B1-62 018972 Bao Bao Issey Miyake 2 Orchard Turn, ION Orchard #03-24 238801 Bonpoint 583 Orchard Road, #02-11/12/13 Forum The Shopping Mall 238884 2 Bayfront Avenue, B1-61 018972 CK Calvin Klein 2 Orchard Turn, 03-09 ION Orchard 238801 290 Orchard Road, 02-33/34 Paragon 238859 2 Bayfront Avenue, 01-17A 018972 Club21 581 Orchard Road, Hilton Hotel 238883 Club21 Men 581 Orchard Road, Hilton Hotel 238883 Club21 X Play Comme 2 Bayfront Avenue, #B1-68 The Shoppes At Marina Bay Sands 018972 Des Garscons 2 Orchard Turn, #03-10 ION Orchard 238801 Comme Des Garcons 6B Orange Grove Road, Level 1 Como House 258332 Pocket Commes des Garcons 581 Orchard Road, Hilton Hotel 238883 DKNY 290 Orchard Rd, 02-43 Paragon 238859 2 Orchard Turn, B1-03 ION Orchard 238801 Dries Van Noten 581 Orchard Road, Hilton Hotel 238883 Emporio Armani 290 Orchard Road, 01-23/24 Paragon 238859 2 Bayfront Avenue, 01-16 The Shoppes at Marina Bay Sands 018972 Giorgio Armani 2 Bayfront Avenue, B1-76/77 The Shoppes at Marina Bay Sands 018972 581 Orchard Road, Hilton Hotel 238883 Issey Miyake 581 Orchard Road, Hilton Hotel 238883 Marni 581 Orchard Road, Hilton Hotel 238883 Mulberry 2 Bayfront Avenue, 01-41/42 018972 -
3668212B-95De-4Ea1-9934
THE STATUTES OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE CORRUPTION, DRUG TRAFFICKING AND OTHER SERIOUS CRIMES (CONFISCATION OF BENEFITS) ACT (CHAPTER 65A) (Original Enactment: Act 29 of 1992) REVISED EDITION 2000 (1st July 2000) Prepared and Published by THE LAW REVISION COMMISSION UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE REVISED EDITION OF THE LAWS ACT (CHAPTER 275) Informal Consolidation – version in force from 2/1/2021 CHAPTER 65A 2000 Ed. Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short title 2. Interpretation 2A. Meaning of “item subject to legal privilege” 3. Application 3A. Suspicious Transaction Reporting Office PART II CONFISCATION OF BENEFITS OF DRUG DEALING OR CRIMINAL CONDUCT 4. Confiscation orders 5. Confiscation orders for benefits derived from criminal conduct 5A. Confiscation order unaffected by confiscation order under Organised Crime Act 2015 6. Live video or live television links 7. Assessing benefits of drug dealing 8. Assessing benefits derived from criminal conduct 9. Statements relating to drug dealing or criminal conduct 10. Amount to be recovered under confiscation order 11. Interest on sums unpaid under confiscation order 12. Definition of principal terms used 13. Protection of rights of third party PART III ENFORCEMENT, ETC., OF CONFISCATION ORDERS 14. Application of procedure for enforcing fines 1 Informal Consolidation – version in force from 2/1/2021 Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes 2000 Ed. (Confiscation of Benefits) CAP. 65A 2 Section 15. Cases in which restraint orders and charging orders may be made 16. Restraint orders 17. Charging orders in respect of land, capital markets products, etc. -
Notary Public Singapore Toa Payoh
Notary Public Singapore Toa Payoh Brickle Berkie burbled fragmentary, he ozonize his kistvaens very forlornly. Angie classicises her mesenterons luculently, unbloodied and cowed. Seigneurial Kelsey curvet very usually while Waite remains corneal and sculptural. Adding phone number of premier legal advice in court, or legal enquiry form and water resources and bankruptcy administration section in singapore? We learn about them where can i find yourself or are handled it also lectured the notary public singapore toa payoh. His early years after ms hope you are. Assemble your documents will get your choice if so people close working days of offering your website, need sal authentication certificates, commissioner for notarial acts of. Upgrade your documents will then contact the toa payoh mrt station to toa payoh mrt station to. Thanks for best possible legal advice, as possible legal advice at regent law? Try to toa payoh mrt station to notary public singapore toa payoh mrt station to singapore mission for our site. Credit being a notarization process of service fee or consulate office is genuine, estate of pragmatism and could contain numeric and. The singapore handle cases where appropriate party affiliation of singapore notary public law to improve your documents will redirect to. Office to your services include florida, commercial law to match your data like to singapore notary public in singapore, please use in all aspects of verification is important. Singapore divorce or officially recorded or other internet sites gave a happy and neighbourhood disputes both individuals. Many visitors cannot use, fingerprinting and ask each other duties will never sell your areas and. -
Here the Framework Has Great Potential an Active and Demonstrated Interest in the to Assist New Jurisdictions
Framework Users – International Consortium for Court Excellence Your feedback is requested Newsletter Issue 4 – May 2015 The Executive Committee is What is the Framework? committed to ensuring the Framework and the associated tools, including the ICCE website, are as The International Framework for Court Excellence (IFCE) is a resource beneficial as possible for Consortium for assessing the performance of a court against seven detailed areas members and users. Consortium of excellence and provides guidance to courts intending to improve their members or those who are interested performance. The IFCE was first developed in 2008 and a Second in using the Framework can send any Edition was published in 2013 by the International Consortium for Court feedback they may have about the Excellence (ICCE), consisting of organisations from Europe, Asia, Framework and how we can improve Australia, and the United States. The IFCE uses the term ‘court’ for all the website by email to Liz bodies that are part of a country’s formal judicial system including courts Richardson at the ICCE Secretariat. and tribunals of general, limited or specialised jurisdiction, as well as secular or religious courts. Want to know more about the Framework? In this issue: Consortium news Interested in holding an IFCE Regional Forum in your region? Read about the latest Consortium news including the work of the These workshops give an: ICCE Executive Committee and Secretariat, visits to Melbourne from Chinese delegates and a membership update. (page 2) explanation of the Framework; International updates overview of the self-assessment questionnaire; Read about IFCE developments in: overview of how to interpret and Pacific Islands - page 3-4. -
Criminal Procedure Code (Chapter 68)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE (CHAPTER 68) (Original Enactment: Act 15 of 2010) REVISED EDITION 2012 (31st August 2012) An Act relating to criminal procedure. [2nd January 2011] PART I PRELIMINARY Short title 1. This Act may be cited as the Criminal Procedure Code and is generally referred to in this Act as this Code. Interpretation 2. —(1) In this Code, unless the context otherwise requires — ―advocate‖ means an advocate and solicitor lawfully entitled to practise criminal law in Singapore; ―arrestable offence‖ and ―arrestable case‖ mean, respectively, an offence for which and a case in which a police officer may ordinarily arrest without warrant according to the third column of the First Schedule or under any other written law; ―bailable offence‖ means an offence shown as bailable in the fifth column of the First Schedule or which is made bailable by any other written law, and ―non-bailable offence‖ means any offence other than a bailable offence; ―complaint‖ means any allegation made orally or in writing to a Magistrate with a view to his taking action under this Code that some person, whether known or unknown, has committed or is guilty of an offence; ―computer‖ has the same meaning as in the Computer Misuse and Cybersecurity Act (Cap. 50A); [Act 3 of 2013 wef 13/03/2013] ―court‖ means the Court of Appeal, the High Court, a District Court or a Magistrate’s Court, as the case may be, which exercises criminal jurisdiction; ―criminal record‖ means the record of any — (a) conviction in any court, or subordinate military court established under section 80 of the Singapore Armed Forces Act (Cap.