The Taxonomy of Leishmania-Like Parasites of Reptiles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Taxonomy of Leishmania-Like Parasites of Reptiles Leishmania. Taxonomie et phylogenèse. Applications éco-épidémiologiques. (Coll. int. CNRS/INSERM, 1984). IMEEE, Montpellier, 1986, 143-148. The taxonomy of Leishmania-like parasites of reptiles R. Killick-Kendrick*, R. Lainson**, J.-A. Rioux***, and V.M. Sarjanova**** SUMMARY — The taxonomic position of the Leishmania-hke parasites occurring as amastigotes or promasti- gotes in the gut or blood of reptiles is reviewed and it is concluded that they should be grouped in the genus Sauroleishmania Ranque, 1973, with Sauroleishmania tarentolae (Wenyon, 1920) as the type species. The principal differences between Leishmania Ross, 1903 and Sauroleishmania Ranque, 1973 include the verte- brate and invertebrate hosts, the host cells inhabited by the amastigote, the sites of development in the sandfly, the kDNA and the distance between the subpelUcular microtubules of the promastigotes. KEY-WORDS — Sauroleishmania — Lizards — Taxonomy. Ali current, modern methods of distinguishing trypanosomatids by examining nucleic acids, isoenzymes or antigens have failed to reveal a close relationship between the leishmaniae of mammals and of reptiles [7] and there now appears to be general agreement that the Leishmania-like parasites of reptiles should be classified separately from the mammalian species of Leishmania. The taxonomic position of the reptilian parasites is, however, confused. In this note, we review the relevant publications and propose that they should be transfered to the genus Sauroleishmania Ranque, 1973. : n Parasites which occur as amastigotes, promastigotes, or both in the blood or cloaca of lizards, or which can be cultured purely as promastigotes from the blood or viscera of lizards, were at first assigned to either the genus Leptomonas Kent, 1880 [21] or the genus Herpetomonas Kent, 1880 [21] (see [15] ). In 1920, Wenyon [52] named two new species of lizard parasites and put them into the genus Leishmania Ross, 1903 [41]. From that time, most other species of similar parasites of lizards have been assigned to this genus. In 1982, Saf janova [42] used the subgeneric name Sauroleishmania to accommodate the so-called leishmaniae of reptiles with Leishmania (Sauroleishmania) gymnodactyli Khodukin and Sofiev, 1947 (cited from Adler [1] ) as the type species. Saf janova's name had, however, already been used in 1973 in a thesis by Ranque [38], although as a genus with a different type species. We have looked into the question of whether or not Ranque's thesis constitutes a publication within the meaning of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature of 1985 [19] and conclude that it is fully acceptable. It satisfies the three criteria in Article 8(a) and was produced by offset printing [Article 8(c) ], not by electrostatic or xerographic methods [see Article 9(3) ]. The next mention of the name was by Nicoli and Nourrit in 1974 [33] who wrote « Sauro• leishmania R.M. Nicoli et Ph. Ranque, 1973, pour les Trypanosomidés (sic) de Nématocères (Phlebotomidae). Développement postérieur prenant chez les Sauropsidés la forme promastigote (infestation par piqúre ou ingestion). Espèce type : Sauroleishmania tarentolae (CM. Wenyon, 1921) de Tarentola mauritanica. » There was, however, no publication by Nicoli and Ranque in 1973 and the citation was modified from that given in Ranque's thesis (R.M. Nicoli, pers. comm.). The differences between Leishmania Ross, 1903 [41], emend. Vickerman, 1976 [50], and Sauroleishmania Ranque, 1973 [38] (Table I) are sufficiently marked to warrant taxonomic * Medicai Research Council Externai Scientific Staff, Department of Pure and Applied Biologj', Imperial CoUege at Silwood Park, Ascot, United Kingdom. ** Wellcome Parasitology Unit, Instituto Evandro Chagas, Belém, Pará, Brazil. *** Laboratoire d'Ecologie médicale et de Pathologie parasitaire (Pr. J.-A. Rioux), Faculte de Médecine, Montpellier, France. **** Gamaleya Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, Academy of Medicai Sciences of the U.S.S.R., Moscow, U.S.S.R. 144 TABLE I Principal differences between Leishmania and Sauroleishmania. Leishmania Ross, 1903, Sauroleishmania Character emend. Vickerman, 1976 Ranque, 1973 Vertebrate host mammals snakes *" and lizards Form in vertebrate host amastigote amastigote or promastigote Host cell of amastigote* macrophage and its precursors monocyte, thrombocyte or erythrocyte Invertebrate host Phlebotomus spp. (Old World) Lutzomyia spp. (New World) Sergentomyia spp. Psychodopygus spp. (New World) (Old World) Site of development suprapylarian or peripylarian hypopylarian or peripylarian in invertebrate host Mode of transmission bite of vector ingestion or bite of vector** Maxi-circles of kDNA 26-27 kb 32-38 kb Distance between sub- pellicular microtubules 25-40 nm 60-70 nm 1. Belova and Bogdanov (1969). 2. Chatton and Blanc (1914), Léger (1918), Francini (1921). Shortt and Swaminath (1928), David (1929), Frenkel (1941), Rioux et al. (1969, 1979), Edeson and Himo (1973), Nadim (1974), Telford (1979), Ovezmukhammedov and Safjanova (1983). 3. Léger (1918). Wenyon (1920), Zmeyev (1936), Fopov (1941), Andrusko and Markov (1955), Killick-Kendrick and Wallbanks (1981). 4. Telford (1979). 5. Telford (pers. comm.). 6. Lainson and Shaw (1979) 7. Kolesnikov et al. (1984). 8. Safjanova (1982). * Amastigotes of Leishmania divide in the macrophage whereas amastigotes of Sauroleishmania, whether in monocytes, thrombocytes or erythrocytes, appear never to be in division. ** No species of Sauroleishmania has yet been transmitted experimentally from a sandfly to a reptile. recognition of two distinct groups. By Article 43(a) of the International Code of Zoológica] Nomenclature (1985), a taxon at genus or subgenus rank is simultaneously established for the other rank with the same author and date. The question of whether Sauroleishmania should be accepted as a genus, as treated in the present paper, or as a subgenus of Leishmania, as viewed by Safjanova [42, 43] is, therefore, a matter of opinion. Ranque [38] clearly indicated S. tarentolae (Wenyon, 1921) as the type species of Sauroleish• mania. However, as Gardener [15] pointed out, the date of the naming of the species tarentolae is 1920, not 1921 as usually cited. The confusion arose because of a delay in the publication of the Journal Parasiíology after World War I resulting in two volumes, 11 and 12, being published in the same year (1920) (F.E.G. Cox, Editor of Parasitology, pers. comm.). When first published, the name was spelt tarantolae, not tarentolae. This is construed as an « inadvertent error » on the assumption that Wenyon intended the name to be spelt in the same way as that of the host, Tarentola. Evidence for this is in Wenyon's monograph published in 1926 [53] where he corrected the name to tarentolae without comment. The later name now stands as a correction of an « incorrect original spelling » [Articles 32(c)(ii) and (d) of the Code (1985)]. The identity of Sauroleishmania Ranque, 1973 rests on the type species, S. tarentolae (We• nyon, 1920), of which there is no type material available. A culture of promastigotes purporting to be L. tarentolae Wenyon, 1920 (code RTAR/DZ/39/TAR VI) isolated by Parrot [35] in 1939 was recently shown by Wallbanks et al. [51] to be Trypanosoma platydactyli Catouillard, 1909. A comparison of isoenzymes revealed no differences between Parrot's parasite and a double cloned culture of the trypanosome. This work, however, did not show that the amastigotes seen in the blood of Tarentola by Chatton and Blanc [8] and Rioux et al. [39, 40] are developmental forms of a trypanosome and, without evidence to the contrary, these stages are presumably Sauroleish• mania tarentolae (Wenyon, 1920) (see [37] ). 145 In Table II a list is given of named species of Leishmania of lizards which are here transferred to Sauroleishmania Ranque, 1973. We give no opinion of the vaUdity of these names some of which may fali into synonymy [15]. Some or ali of those parasitizing the intestinal tract of lizards may be parasites of ingested insects [10, 18, 49, 50]. In addition of the named species, there are a number of reports of Sauroleishmania published without names. Particularly interesting records include : amastigotes of Chalcides ocellatus in Sicily [13] ; promastigotes cultured from the blood of five species of snakes in the Turkmenian S.S.R. [6] ; promastigotes (some of which were later identified by Saf janova (unpubl. observations) as S. gymnodactyli) cultured from the blood of 4 species of Phrynocephalus, 1 of Agama, 5 of Eremias, 1 of Gymnodactylus and 1 of Teratoscincus of the Turkmenian S.S.R. [5] ; a parasite of Alsophylax pipiens on mainland China [16] ; amastigotes seen in smears of bone marrow and liver of lizards in Iran [31] ; promastigotes cultured from the heart blood of Agama sp. near Mashad, Iran [32] ; amastigotes in the thrombocytes of Agama agilis and Teratoscincus scincus in Pakis- tan [47] ; two different promastigotes of Chamaeleo dipidis in Zâmbia, one in the cloaca and one an ephemeral infection of the peripheral blood [23] ; unusually small amastigotes in the erythro- cytes of two species of geckoes, Hemidactylus platycephalus and Chemaspis africana, in Tanzânia (Sam Telford Jr, pers. comm.); and amastigotes and promastigotes in the intestine of Anolis lucius in Cuba [20]. There are numerous other records of flagellates in the guts of lizards, often assigned to the genera Herpetomonas and Leptomonas which, like some of the named species of Sauroleishmania in the intestine and cloaca of reptiles, may have been
Recommended publications
  • Zootaxa, a New Species of Lizard Genus Gymnodactylus Spix, 1825
    Zootaxa 2008: 38–52 (2009) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2009 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A new species of lizard genus Gymnodactylus Spix, 1825 (Squamata: Gekkota: Phyllodactylidae) from Serra do Sincorá, northeastern Brazil, and the status of G. carvalhoi Vanzolini, 2005 JOSÉ CASSIMIRO1 & MIGUEL T. RODRIGUES2 Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 11461, CEP 05422–970, São Paulo, SP, Brasil. E-mails: [email protected] & [email protected] Abstract A new species of gekkonid lizard genus Gymnodactylus Spix, 1825 is described on the basis of material collected in the “campos rupestres” (open rocky communities) of Mucugê municipality, northeastern Brazil. G. vanzolinii sp. nov. differs from its congeners in the number of transverse and longitudinal rows of dorsal tubercles and color pattern. It is thought to be closer to G. guttulatus which also occurs and is restricted to the rocky communities from highland open areas in the Espinhaço mountain range. The discovery leads to a reevaluation of the taxonomic status of G. carvalhoi Vanzolini, 2005, which is here considered a synonym of G. amarali Barbour, 1925. Key words: Squamata; Gekkota; Phyllodactylidae; Gymnodactylus vanzolinii sp. nov.; New species; Gymnodactylus carvalhoi; Gymnodactylus amarali; Synonymy; Meadow fields; Serra do Sincorá; Mucugê municipality; Northeastern Brazil Resumo Uma nova espécie de lagarto geconídeo do gênero Gymnodactylus Spix, 1825 é descrita com base em material coletado nos campos rupestres dos arredores do município de Mucugê, estado da Bahia, nordeste do Brasil. G. vanzolinii sp. nov. difere de seus congêneres no número de fileiras transversais e longitudinais de tubérculos dorsais e no padrão de col- orido.
    [Show full text]
  • Brongniart, 1800) in the Paris Natural History Museum
    Zootaxa 4138 (2): 381–391 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4138.2.10 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:683BD945-FE55-4616-B18A-33F05B2FDD30 Rediscovery of the 220-year-old holotype of the Banded Iguana, Brachylophus fasciatus (Brongniart, 1800) in the Paris Natural History Museum IVAN INEICH1 & ROBERT N. FISHER2 1Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Universités, UMR 7205 (CNRS, EPHE, MNHN, UPMC; ISyEB: Institut de Systéma- tique, Évolution et Biodiversité), CP 30 (Reptiles), 25 rue Cuvier, F-75005 Paris, France. E-mail: [email protected] 2U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, San Diego Field Station, 4165 Spruance Road, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92101-0812, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The Paris Natural History Museum herpetological collection (MNHN-RA) has seven historical specimens of Brachylo- phus spp. collected late in the 18th and early in the 19th centuries. Brachylophus fasciatus was described in 1800 by Brongniart but its type was subsequently considered as lost and never present in MNHN-RA collections. We found that 220 year old holotype among existing collections, registered without any data, and we show that it was donated to MNHN- RA from Brongniart’s private collection after his death in 1847. It was registered in the catalogue of 1851 but without any data or reference to its type status. According to the coloration (uncommon midbody saddle-like dorsal banding pattern) and morphometric data given in its original description and in the subsequent examination of the type in 1802 by Daudin and in 1805 by Brongniart we found that lost holotype in the collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Conservation Action Plans for Mongolian Reptiles and Amphibians
    Summary Conservation Action Plans for Mongolian Reptiles and Amphibians Compiled by Terbish, Kh., Munkhbayar, Kh., Clark, E.L., Munkhbat, J. and Monks, E.M. Edited by Munkhbaatar, M., Baillie, J.E.M., Borkin, L., Batsaikhan, N., Samiya, R. and Semenov, D.V. ERSITY O IV F N E U D U E T C A A T T S I O E N H T M ONGOLIA THE WORLD BANK i ii This publication has been funded by the World Bank’s Netherlands-Mongolia Trust Fund for Environmental Reform. The fi ndings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily refl ect the views of the Executive Directors of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colours, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgement on the part of the World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. The World Conservation Union (IUCN) have contributed to the production of the Summary Conservation Action Plans for Mongolian Reptiles and Amphibians, providing technical support, staff time, and data. IUCN supports the production of the Summary Conservation Action Plans for Mongolian Reptiles and Amphibians, but the information contained in this document does not necessarily represent the views of IUCN. Published by: Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London, NW1 4RY Copyright: © Zoological Society of London and contributors 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen D. Busack
    BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH AND BIBLIOGRAPHY OF STEPHEN D. BUSACK Stephen D. Busack Rochester, New York SMITHSONIAN HERPETOLOGICAL INFORMATION SERVICE NO. 154 2018 . SMITHSONIAN HERPETOLOGICAL INFORMATION SERVICE The first number of the SMITHSONIAN HERPETOLOGICAL INFORMATION SERVICE series appeared in 1968. SHIS number 1 was a list of herpetological publications arising from within or through the Smithsonian Institution and its collections entity, the United States National Museum (USNM). The latter exists now as little more than the occasional title for the registration activities of the National Museum of Natural History. No. 1 was prepared and printed by J. A. Peters, then Curator-in-Charge of the Division of Amphibians & Reptiles. The availability of a NASA translation service and assorted indices encouraged him to continue the series and distribute these items on an irregular schedule. The series continues under that tradition. Specifically, the SHIS series distributes translations, bibliographies, indices, and similar items judged useful to individuals interested in the biology of amphibians and reptiles, and unlikely to be published in the normal technical journals. We wish to encourage individuals to share their bibliographies, translations, etc. with other herpetologists through the SHIS series. If you have such an item, please contact George Zug [zugg @ si.edu] for its consideration for distribution through the SHIS series. Our increasingly digital world is changing the manner of our access to research literature and that is now true for SHIS publications. They are distributed now as pdf documents through two Smithsonian outlets: BIODIVERSITY HERITAGE LIBRARY. www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/15728 All numbers from 1 to 131 [1968-2001] available in BHL.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution of the Types and Type Localities of Some Early Nominal Species of the Australian Myobatrachid Frog Genus Pseudophryne Fitzinger, 1843
    Zootaxa 4407 (1): 051–064 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4407.1.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:99FDA7A2-9C4C-4A7B-99D9-ECC439D06362 Resolution of the types and type localities of some early nominal species of the Australian myobatrachid frog genus Pseudophryne Fitzinger, 1843 GLENN M. SHEA1,2,4 & JODI J.L. ROWLEY2,3 1Sydney School of Veterinary Science B01, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. 2Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, 1 William St, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia. 3Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. 4Corresponding author: Glenn M. Shea. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The types and type localities of Bombinator australis Gray, 1835, Pseudophryne bibronii Günther, 1859, and Phryniscus albifrons Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854, are defined. The nominal type locality for B. australis, Swan River, is con- sidered to be in error. The source of the specimen, Joseph Wright, owned property in the Swan River colony in Western Australia, but later resided in Sydney, the latter locality within the known range of the species. We designate a specimen in the Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris as lectotype of Pseudophryne bibronii, restricting the type locality of both species to Parramatta, near Sydney, based on the published statements of the collector, François Péron. The holotype of Phryniscus albifrons, a species defined by a painting of a specimen, was likely to have been collected by Jules Verreaux, but the only extant Pseudophryne obtained from Verreaux does not match the type illustration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecology of Lizard Reproductive Output
    Global Ecology and Biogeography, (Global Ecol. Biogeogr.) (2011) ••, ••–•• RESEARCH The ecology of lizard reproductive PAPER outputgeb_700 1..11 Shai Meiri1*, James H. Brown2 and Richard M. Sibly3 1Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, ABSTRACT 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel, 2Department of Biology, Aim We provide a new quantitative analysis of lizard reproductive ecology. Com- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA and Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde parative studies of lizard reproduction to date have usually considered life-history Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA, 3School components separately. Instead, we examine the rate of production (productivity of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, hereafter) calculated as the total mass of offspring produced in a year. We test ReadingRG6 6AS, UK whether productivity is influenced by proxies of adult mortality rates such as insularity and fossorial habits, by measures of temperature such as environmental and body temperatures, mode of reproduction and activity times, and by environ- mental productivity and diet. We further examine whether low productivity is linked to high extinction risk. Location World-wide. Methods We assembled a database containing 551 lizard species, their phyloge- netic relationships and multiple life history and ecological variables from the lit- erature. We use phylogenetically informed statistical models to estimate the factors related to lizard productivity. Results Some, but not all, predictions of metabolic and life-history theories are supported. When analysed separately, clutch size, relative clutch mass and brood frequency are poorly correlated with body mass, but their product – productivity – is well correlated with mass. The allometry of productivity scales similarly to metabolic rate, suggesting that a constant fraction of assimilated energy is allocated to production irrespective of body size.
    [Show full text]
  • The Terrestrial Mammals, Reptiles and Amphibians of the Uae – Species List and Status Report
    THE TERRESTRIAL MAMMALS, REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS OF THE UAE – SPECIES LIST AND STATUS REPORT January 2005 TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH CENTRE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH & WILDLIFE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY P.O. Box 45553 Abu Dhabi DOCUMENT ISSUE SHEET Project Number: 03-31-0001 Project Title: Abu Dhabi Baseline Survey Name Signature Date Drew, C.R. Al Dhaheri, S.S. Prepared by: Barcelo, I. Tourenq, C. Submitted by: Drew, C.R. Approved by: Newby, J. Authorized for Issue by: Issue Status: Final Recommended Circulation: Internal and external File Reference Number: 03-31-0001/WSM/TP007 Drew, C.R.// Al Dhaheri, S.S.// Barcelo, I.// Tourenq, C.//Al Team Members Hemeri, A.A. DOCUMENT REVISION SHEET Revision No. Date Affected Date of By pages Change V2.1 30/11/03 All 29/11/03 CRD020 V2.2 18/9/04 6 18/9/04 CRD020 V2.3 24/10/04 4 & 5 24/10/04 CRD020 V2.4 24/11/04 4, 7, 14 27/11/04 CRD020 V2.5 08/01/05 1,4,11,15,16 08/01/05 CJT207 Table of Contents Table of Contents ________________________________________________________________________________ 3 Part 1 The Mammals of The UAE____________________________________________________________________ 4 1. Carnivores (Order Carnivora) ______________________________________________________________ 5 a. Cats (Family Felidae)___________________________________________________________________ 5 b. Dogs (Family Canidae) __________________________________________________________________ 5 c. Hyaenas (Family Hyaenidae) _____________________________________________________________ 5 d. Weasels (Family Mustelidae) _____________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Predation Behavior with Individuals Aggregation on Streetlights in Tarentola Mauritanica (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from Southern Spain
    BIHAREAN BIOLOGIST 8 (2): 120-121 ©Biharean Biologist, Oradea, Romania, 2014 Article No.: 141205 http://biozoojournals.ro/bihbiol/index.html Predation behavior with individuals aggregation on streetlights in Tarentola mauritanica (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from Southern Spain Ana Lozano-Del CAMPO1,2 and Roberto GARCÍA-ROA3,* 1. Fonoteca Zoológica (FonoZoo.com), National Museum of Natural Sciences (CSIC) of Madrid, Spain. 2. Department of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, National Museum of Natural Sciences – Spanish Research Council (MNCN-CSIC). José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2, 28006, Madrid, Spain. E-mail: [email protected] 3. Department of Evolutionary Ecology. National Museum of Natural Science – Spanish Research Council (MNCN-CSIC). José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2, 28006, Madrid, Spain. E-mail: [email protected] * Corresponding autor, R. Garcia-Roa, E-mail: [email protected] Received: 02 July 2014 / Accepted: 19. August 2014 / Available online: 30. September 2014 / Printed: December 2014 Abstract. Tarentola mauritanica is the most common gecko species in the Iberian Peninsula. It is widespread in most of the anthropogenic areas, where it shows predating behavior and male territoriality, especially during breeding season. In this note, we report an atypical aggregation of this species found in the streetlamps of the most frequented area of a campsite in Ronda, Malaga, Spain. There are previously reported T. mauritanica diurnal aggregations in retreat sites, but not much information can be found related to the interaction among reptiles in small places with high prey availability. This unusual tolerance to the presence of other males in such a reduced but suitable place for predating as a spotlight near humid facilities could be explained as an adaptive strategy to increase their success in hunting.
    [Show full text]
  • Tarentola Mauritanica
    Tarentola mauritanica Region: 3 Taxonomic Authority: (Linnaeus, 1758) Synonyms: Common Names: Moorish Gecko English Common Wall Gecko English Mauergecko German Salamanquesa Común Spanish geco comune Italian Osga Portuguese Order: Sauria Family: Gekkonidae Notes on taxonomy: Genetic analyses suggest that the subspecies Tarentola mauritanica fascicularis is probably a valid species (Harris et al. 2004), but no formal taxonomic proposal has yet been made (Crochet and Dubois 2004). Tarentola mauritanica appears to be a species complex, with animals in northwestern Libya and southern Tunisia possibly representing a separate species (S. Baha El Din pers. comm.). General Information Biome Terrestrial Freshwater Marine Geographic Range of species: Habitat and Ecology Information: This species ranges throughout much of the Mediterranean region. It is found in a variety of habitats, and it has been recorded from rocky Mainland European populations are distributed from Portugal (except areas, cliffs, stone walls, ruins, building walls and inside houses. It is the northwest), Spain (absent from most of the north), and southern generally not present in forested areas although animals can often be France, throughout mainly coastal areas of Italy, southern Slovenia, found climbing in trees. The females lay clutches of one to two eggs. northern coastal Croatia and southwestern parts of Greece. In northern These may be laid communally, typically under stones, in cracks and in Africa the species ranges from northern Egypt, through northern Libya, hollow trees. northern and central Tunisia, and northern Algeria to most of Morocco and northwestern Western Sahara. There is an isolated introduced population in southern Western Sahara. It is present on many Mediterranean islands including Corsica (France), Sardinia, Sicily, Pantellaria and Lampedusa (all in Italy), the Ionian Islands and Crete (all in Greece).
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Fifth National Report
    CONVENTION ON CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY THE 5TH NATIONAL REPORT OF MONGOLIA biolohJA JJa folea YeehcO beiide& oa KnWWn}A. T HE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGI 5 T H N A T IO N AL R EPO RT C AL DIVERSITY OF M O N GOLIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND GREEN DEVELOPMENT STEPPE FORWARD PROGRAMME, Government building II, BIOLOGY DEPARTMENT, United Nation’s street 5/2, NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF MONGOLIA TH Chingeltei District, Ulaanbaatar 15160, NUM, Building-2, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia THE 5 NATIONAL REPORT OF Mongolia P.O.Box 537, Ulaanbaatar 210646A, Tel: 976-51-266197 Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia E-mail: [email protected] Tel: 976-99180148; 976-88305909; 976-88083058 MONGOLIA E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Designed by Mongolica Publishing 2014 Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. 2014 CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY FINANCED BY: MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND GREEN DEVELOPMENT CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY-MONGOLIA GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY THE 5TH NATIONAL REPORT OF MONGOLIA REPORT COMPILERS: COMPILED BY: S. GOMBOBAATAR STEPPE FORWARD PROGRAMME, NUM S. MYAGMARSUREN N. CONABOY М. Мunkhjargal TAXON COMPILERS: PLANT: B. OYUNTSETSEG, M. URGAMAL INVERTEBRATE: S. GANTIGMAA Fish, aMphibian, reptile: kh. Тerbish BIRD: S. GOMBOBAATAR MAMMAL: S. SHAR CONTRIBUTIONS FROM: EDITORS: NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF MONGOLIA INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGY, MONGOLIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES D. BATBOLD MONGOLIAN ORNITHOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles of North America North of Mexico, with Comments Regarding Confidence in Our Understanding
    SCIENTIFIC AND STANDARD ENGLISH NAMES OF AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES OF NORTH AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO, WITH COMMENTS REGARDING CONFIDENCE IN OUR UNDERSTANDING Crotalus horridus Committee on Standard English and Scientific Names Brian I. Crother, Chair Officially Recognized and Adopted by: The Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists The Herpetologists’ League SCIENTIFIC AND STANDARD ENGLISH NAMES OF AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES OF NORTH AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO, WITH COMMENTS REGARDING CONFI- DENCE IN OUR UNDERSTANDING BRIAN I. CROTHER (Committee Chair), Department of Biology, Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, LA 70402 USA JEFF BOUNDY, Fur and Refuge Division, Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, P.O. Box 98,000, Baton Rouge, LA 70898 USA JONATHAN A. CAMPBELL, Department of Biology, UTA Box 19498, University of Texas, Arlington, TX 76019 USA KEVIN DE QUEIROZ, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560 USA DARREL R. FROST, Division of Vertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024 USA RICHARD HIGHTON, Department of Zoology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA JOHN B. IVERSON, Department of Biology, Earlham College, Richmond, IN 47374 USA PETER A. MEYLAN, Department of Natural Sciences, Eckerd College, P. O. Box, 12560, St. Petersburg, FL 33711 USA TOD W. REEDER, Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182 USA MICHAEL E. SEIDEL, Department of Biological Sciences, Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25701 USA JACK W. SITES, JR., Department of Zoology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 USA TRAVIS W.
    [Show full text]