Biweekly THP-COPBLM (Pirarubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biweekly THP-COPBLM (Pirarubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine Leukemia (1998) 12, 1457–1460 1998 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0887-6924/98 $12.00 http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/leu Biweekly THP-COPBLM (pirarubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, bleomycin and procarbazine) regimen combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma N Niitsu and M Umeda First Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University School of Medicine, 6-77-7 Omori-Nishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo 143-8541, Japan Biweekly THP-COPBLM including pirarubicin (THP), which is relapse and refractory NHL is treated by high-dose chemo- thought to be less toxic than doxorubicin, was used to treat therapy with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) and the remission rate and adverse events were studied in 42 patients younger than 69 (PBSCT), decreased cardiac function also not infrequently years. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 37 patients poses a problem. (88.1%) and partial remission in five (11.9%). Classified by inter- In the present study, we used a biweekly THP-COPBLM national prognostic index, CR was achieved in 16 out of 17 low– regimen including a new anthracycline anticancer agent, pira- intermediate-risk patients, 14 out of 16 high–intermediate-risk rubicin (THP), which is considered to be less cardiotoxic than patients and seven out of nine high-risk patients. The 3-year DXR, to increase the dose intensity, and we assessed the effi- survival rate was 72.1% and the 3-year event-free survival rate was 58%. Grade 3 or higher adverse events included granulocy- cacy and occurrence of adverse events. topenia in 39 patients (92.9%) and thrombocytopenia in seven (16.7%). The biweekly THP-COPBLM regimen appears useful for the treatment of aggressive intermediate- and high-grade NHL, and G-CSF made it possible to shorten the interval Patients and methods between courses of chemotherapy. Further studies regarding adverse events on organs, other than on bone marrow are required to improve the long-term results of combination ther- Patients apy on NHL. Keywords: non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma; pirarubicin; granulocyte col- Forty-two Japanese patients with previously untreated NHL ony-stimulating factor; international prognostic index who received combination therapy between April 1994 and August 1997 are included in this report. The median age was 56 years (range 18–69). There were 24 males and 18 females. Introduction According to the Ann Arbor classification,8 staging was determined by bone marrow aspiration, bone marrow biopsy, In recent years, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) has been computerized tomography (CT) of the chest, abdominal son- treated successfully in an increasing number of patients. ography, abdominal CT, gastrointestinal endoscopy and gal- Third-generation chemotherapy has achieved complete lium scintigraphy as well as routine examinations. Their per- remission in 80–85% of the patients treated, and long-term formance status (PS) was between 0 and 3 according to the survival in 60–70%.1,2 According to Fisher et al,3 however, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG).9 Of the 42 intensified chemotherapy with third-generation multiple patients, 12 had stage II, 17 had stage III and 13 had stage IV. anticancer agents is not significantly different in efficacy from Histopathology of the NHLs was classified according to the the CHOP regimen, but it causes more adverse effects. When Working formulation.10 They were of the diffuse large cell patients treated mainly with the CHOP regimen were classi- type in 22 patients, the diffuse mixed cell type in 15, the dif- fied into prognostic groups according to the international fuse small non-cleaved cell type in three, and the follicular prognostic index,4 the 5-year survival rate was 73% for the large cell type in two. All patients tested negative for human low-risk group, while the rates for the low–intermediate (L-I), T cell lymphotropic virus type-I (HTLV-I) antibody. The score high–intermediate (H-I), and high (H)-risk groups were 51, 43 system of the International Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Prog- and 26%, respectively. This indicates that the CHOP regimen nostic Factors (INHLPF) Project4 was used to evaluate thera- is satisfactorily effective for low-risk group non-Hodgkin’s peutic effects by age-adjusted risk group. The three prognostic lymphoma, but is inadequate when the prognosis is poorer. In factors employed were: Ann Arbor stages III and IV, a PS score order to improve the effectiveness of chemotherapy for these of 2 or higher as determined according to the ECOG criteria, poorer prognostic groups, a biweekly dose-intensified CHOP and an increased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level. They regimen has been used, in which CHOP is administered with were of the L-I risk group in 17, the H-I group risk in 16, and G-CSF to increase the doses of the key agents the H risk group in nine. (cyclophosphamide (CPA) and doxorubicin (DXR)).5,6 The total dose of DXR is limited by cardiotoxicity. When given alone, the dose limit is 450–550 mg/m2. Our previous study Treatment showed that cardiotoxicity appeared when the total dose of DXR in the COP-BLAM regimen was 350–400 mg/m.2,7 If it is All patients were treated with THP-COPBLM chemotherapy remembered that 40–50% of patients with NHL can usually plus recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating fac- achieve long-term survival, cardiotoxicity associated with pro- tor (G-CSF). THP-COPBLM regimen consisted of CPA longed administration of DXR should be considered. When 750 mg/m2, THP 50 mg/m2 and vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum dose, 2 mg) on day 1, and prednisone 40 mg/m2, procarbazine 100 mg/m2 on days 1–7 and bleomycin 10 mg Correspondence: N Niitsu; Fax: +81 03 3763 8298 on day 10 for six cycles every 2 weeks if absolute neutrophil Received 23 March 1998; accepted 27 May 1998 count (ANC) was у2 × 109/l and platelets у10 × 109/l. Dose Biweekly THP-COPBLM combined with G-CSF for NHL N Niitsu and M Umeda 1458 modification was planned for CPA and THP as follows: Table 1 Therapeutic effects decrease of 25% if ANC count was Ͻ2 × 109/l or platelet count Ͻ100 × 109/l on the planned day of treatment; decrease CR (%) PR (%) P value of 50% if the leukocyte count was Ͻ1.5 × 109/l or platelet count Ͻ70 × 109/l; and chemotherapy delay until hematologic Overall 37/42 (88.1) 5/42 (11.9) Ͻ × 9 Stage recovery if the leukocyte count was 1 10 /l or platelet Ͻ × 9 II 12/12 (100) — NS count 50 10 /l. Doses were not adjusted for patient’s age. III, IV 25/30 (83.3) 5/30 (16.7) G-CSF (lenograstim) was administered as a daily subcutaneous Histology dose of 2 ␮g/kg from day 5 up to day 13 without day 10 or Diffuse large 21/22 (95.5) 1/22 (4.5) ANC Ͼ5 × 109/l. Diffuse mixed 12/15 (80) 3/15 (20) Diffuse small non-cleaved 2/3 (66.7) 1/3 (33.3) NS Follicular large 2/2 (100) — Phenotype Analysis and statistics T cell 14/16 (87.5) 2/16 (12.5) B cell 23/26 (88.5) 3/26 (11.5) NS Performance status Response to treatment was documented on completion of 0, 1 28/31 (90.3) 3/31 (9.7) chemotherapy. Complete remission (CR) was defined as 2, 3 9/11 (81.8) 2/11 (18.2) NS absence of detectable disease on clinical, radiologic and his- LDH; Ͼ1 × normal 33/37 (89.2) 4/37 (12.1) NS у Ͻ tologic criteria. Partial remission (PR) required a Ͼ50% Soluble IL-2R; 1000 U/ml 9/14 (64.3) 5/14 (35.7) 0.01 Bone marrow involvement 2/5 (40) 3/5 (60) Ͻ0.01 reduction of tumor volume. Duration of CR was calculated Bulky mass (diameter у10 cm) 2/4 (50) 2/4 (50) Ͻ0.01 from completion of chemotherapy to relapse or last follow- AAII up. Overall survival (OS) was the interval from initiation of L-I 16/17 (94.1) 1/17 (5.9) therapy to the time of death or last follow-up. Survival analysis H-I 14/16 (87.1) 2/16 (12.5) NS was performed according to Kaplan–Meier.11 The generalized H 7/9 (77.8) 2/9 (22.2) Wilcoxon test (rank sum test) was used to compare mean dif- ference between the two groups. A level of P Ͻ 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. WHO criteria12 were used to define adverse events. Dose intensity (DI) was evaluated according to Hryniuk and Bush.13 The actual DI of CPA, THP were calculated by dividing the actual total amount of each drug by the time needed for delivery. The expressions of the actual DI as fractions of the stated protocol dosages were defined as relative DI. The calculation was made for the whole treatment course and separately for the initial cycles needed to achieve maximal response (either CR or maximal degree of partial remission) or to determine the progression of disease. Results Therapeutic effects Figure 1 Survival time and event-free survival of non-Hodgkin’s All patients were evaluated for response and survival. Of the lymphoma patients treated with biweekly THP-COPBLAM therapy. 42 patients treated, 37 (88.1%) achieved a CR and five (11.9%) achieved a PR, for a response rate of 100%. The response rate was 100% for stage II disease and 83.3% for stage III and IV disease. With respect to histopathology, the response rate was 95.5% for diffuse large cell type, 80% for diffuse mixed cell type, 66.7% for diffuse small non-cleaved cell type and 100% for follicular large cell type, with no sig- nificant difference observed among histologic subsets.
Recommended publications
  • Topotecan, Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Hydrochloride
    Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer (report contains no commercial in confidence data) Produced by Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York Authors Ms Caroline Main, Research Fellow, Systematic Reviews, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, YO10 5DD Ms Laura Ginnelly, Research Fellow, Health Economics, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, YO10 5DD Ms Susan Griffin, Research Fellow, Health Economics, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, YO10 5DD Dr Gill Norman, Research Fellow, Systematic Reviews, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, YO10 5DD Mr Marco Barbieri, Research Fellow, Health Economics, The Economic and Health Research Centre, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain Ms Lisa Mather, Information Officer, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, YO10 5DD Dr Dan Stark, Senior Lecturer in Oncology and Honorary Consultant in Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Bradford Royal Infirmary Mr Stephen Palmer, Senior Research Fellow, Health Economics, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, YO10 5DD Dr Rob Riemsma, Reviews Manager, Systematic Reviews, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, YO10 5DD Correspondence to Caroline Main, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, YO10 5DD, Tel: (01904) 321055, Fax: (01904) 321041, E-mail: [email protected] Date completed September 2004 Expiry date September 2006 Contributions of authors Caroline Main Lead reviewer responsible for writing the protocol, study selection, data extraction, validity assessment and writing the final report. Laura Ginnelly Involved in the cost-effectiveness section, writing the protocol, study selection, data extraction, development of the economic model and report writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Testicular Cancer Treatment Regimens
    Testicular Cancer Treatment Regimens Clinical Trials: The NCCN recommends cancer patient participation in clinical trials as the gold standard for treatment. Cancer therapy selection, dosing, administration, and the management of related adverse events can be a complex process that should be handled by an experienced healthcare team. Clinicians must choose and verify treatment options based on the individual patient; drug dose modifications and supportive care interventions should be administered accordingly. The cancer treatment regimens below may include both U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved and unapproved indications/regimens. These regimens are only provided to supplement the latest treatment strategies. These Guidelines are a work in progress that may be refined as often as new significant data becomes available. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines® are a consensus statement of its authors regarding their views of currently accepted approaches to treatment. Any clinician seeking to apply or consult any NCCN Guidelines® is expected to use independent medical judgment in the context of individual clinical circumstances to determine any patient’s care or treatment. The NCCN makes no warranties of any kind whatsoever regarding their content, use, or application and disclaims any responsibility for their application or use in any way. Note: All recommendations are category 2A unless otherwise indicated. uPrimary Chemotherapy for Germ Cell Tumors1 REGIMEN DOSING Preferred Regimens BEP (Bleomycin + Etoposide + Days 1-5: Cisplatin 20mg/m2 IV over 60 minutes dailya Cisplatin)2,a,b Days 1-5: Etoposide 100mg/m2 IV over 60 minutes daily Days 1,8,15 OR Days 2,9,16: Bleomycin 30 units IV over 10 minutes daily.
    [Show full text]
  • Prednisolone-Rituximab-Vincristine (Rpacebom)
    Chemotherapy Protocol LYMPHOMA BLEOMYCIN-CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE-DOXORUBICIN-ETOPOSIDE-METHOTREXATE- PREDNISOLONE-RITUXIMAB-VINCRISTINE (RPACEBOM) Regimen Lymphoma – RPACEBOM-Bleomycin-Cyclophosphamide-Doxorubicin-Etoposide- Methotrexate-Prednisolone-Rituximab-Vincristine Indication CD20 Positive Non Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Toxicity Drug Adverse Effect Bleomycin Pulmonary toxicity, rigors, skin pigmentation, nail changes Cyclophosphamide Dysuria, haemorrragic cystitis (rare), taste disturbances Doxorubicin Cardiotoxicity, urinary discolouration (red) Etoposide Hypotension on rapid infusion, alopecia, hyperbilirubinaemia Methotrexate Stomatitis, conjunctivitis, renal toxicity Weight gain, GI disturbances, hyperglycaemia, CNS disturbances, Prednisolone cushingoid changes, glucose intolerance Severe cytokine release syndrome, increased incidence of Rituxumab infective complications, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy Vincristine Peripheral neuropathy, constipation, jaw pain The adverse effects listed are not exhaustive. Please refer to the relevant Summary of Product Characteristics for full details. Version 1.2 (Jan 2015) Page 1 of 16 Lymphoma- RPACEBOM-Bleomycin-Cyclophospham-Doxorubicin-Etoposide-Methotrexate-Prednisolone-Rituximab-Vincristine Monitoring Drugs FBC, LFTs and U&Es prior to day one and fifteen Albumin prior to each cycle Regular blood glucose monitoring Check hepatitis B status before starting treatment with rituximab The presence of a third fluid compartment e.g. ascites or renal failure may delay the clearance of methotrexate
    [Show full text]
  • Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment Regimens
    HODGKIN LYMPHOMA TREATMENT REGIMENS (Part 1 of 5) Clinical Trials: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends cancer patient participation in clinical trials as the gold standard for treatment. Cancer therapy selection, dosing, administration, and the management of related adverse events can be a complex process that should be handled by an experienced health care team. Clinicians must choose and verify treatment options based on the individual patient; drug dose modifications and supportive care interventions should be administered accordingly. The cancer treatment regimens below may include both U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved and unapproved indications/regimens. These regimens are provided only to supplement the latest treatment strategies. These Guidelines are a work in progress that may be refined as often as new significant data become available. The NCCN Guidelines® are a consensus statement of its authors regarding their views of currently accepted approaches to treatment. Any clinician seeking to apply or consult any NCCN Guidelines® is expected to use independent medical judgment in the context of individual clinical circumstances to determine any patient’s care or treatment. The NCCN makes no warranties of any kind whatsoever regarding their content, use, or application and disclaims any responsibility for their application or use in any way. Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma1 Note: All recommendations are Category 2A unless otherwise indicated. Primary Treatment Stage IA, IIA Favorable (No Bulky Disease, <3 Sites of Disease, ESR <50, and No E-lesions) REGIMEN DOSING Doxorubicin + Bleomycin + Days 1 and 15: Doxorubicin 25mg/m2 IV push + bleomycin 10units/m2 IV push + Vinblastine + Dacarbazine vinblastine 6mg/m2 IV over 5–10 minutes + dacarbazine 375mg/m2 IV over (ABVD) (Category 1)2-5 60 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Name Plate Number Well Location % Inhibition, Screen Axitinib 1 1 20 Gefitinib (ZD1839) 1 2 70 Sorafenib Tosylate 1 3 21 Cr
    Drug Name Plate Number Well Location % Inhibition, Screen Axitinib 1 1 20 Gefitinib (ZD1839) 1 2 70 Sorafenib Tosylate 1 3 21 Crizotinib (PF-02341066) 1 4 55 Docetaxel 1 5 98 Anastrozole 1 6 25 Cladribine 1 7 23 Methotrexate 1 8 -187 Letrozole 1 9 65 Entecavir Hydrate 1 10 48 Roxadustat (FG-4592) 1 11 19 Imatinib Mesylate (STI571) 1 12 0 Sunitinib Malate 1 13 34 Vismodegib (GDC-0449) 1 14 64 Paclitaxel 1 15 89 Aprepitant 1 16 94 Decitabine 1 17 -79 Bendamustine HCl 1 18 19 Temozolomide 1 19 -111 Nepafenac 1 20 24 Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) 1 21 -43 Lapatinib (GW-572016) Ditosylate 1 22 88 Temsirolimus (CCI-779, NSC 683864) 1 23 96 Belinostat (PXD101) 1 24 46 Capecitabine 1 25 19 Bicalutamide 1 26 83 Dutasteride 1 27 68 Epirubicin HCl 1 28 -59 Tamoxifen 1 29 30 Rufinamide 1 30 96 Afatinib (BIBW2992) 1 31 -54 Lenalidomide (CC-5013) 1 32 19 Vorinostat (SAHA, MK0683) 1 33 38 Rucaparib (AG-014699,PF-01367338) phosphate1 34 14 Lenvatinib (E7080) 1 35 80 Fulvestrant 1 36 76 Melatonin 1 37 15 Etoposide 1 38 -69 Vincristine sulfate 1 39 61 Posaconazole 1 40 97 Bortezomib (PS-341) 1 41 71 Panobinostat (LBH589) 1 42 41 Entinostat (MS-275) 1 43 26 Cabozantinib (XL184, BMS-907351) 1 44 79 Valproic acid sodium salt (Sodium valproate) 1 45 7 Raltitrexed 1 46 39 Bisoprolol fumarate 1 47 -23 Raloxifene HCl 1 48 97 Agomelatine 1 49 35 Prasugrel 1 50 -24 Bosutinib (SKI-606) 1 51 85 Nilotinib (AMN-107) 1 52 99 Enzastaurin (LY317615) 1 53 -12 Everolimus (RAD001) 1 54 94 Regorafenib (BAY 73-4506) 1 55 24 Thalidomide 1 56 40 Tivozanib (AV-951) 1 57 86 Fludarabine
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0024365A1 Vaya Et Al
    US 2006.0024.365A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0024365A1 Vaya et al. (43) Pub. Date: Feb. 2, 2006 (54) NOVEL DOSAGE FORM (30) Foreign Application Priority Data (76) Inventors: Navin Vaya, Gujarat (IN); Rajesh Aug. 5, 2002 (IN)................................. 699/MUM/2002 Singh Karan, Gujarat (IN); Sunil Aug. 5, 2002 (IN). ... 697/MUM/2002 Sadanand, Gujarat (IN); Vinod Kumar Jan. 22, 2003 (IN)................................... 80/MUM/2003 Gupta, Gujarat (IN) Jan. 22, 2003 (IN)................................... 82/MUM/2003 Correspondence Address: Publication Classification HEDMAN & COSTIGAN P.C. (51) Int. Cl. 1185 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS A6IK 9/22 (2006.01) NEW YORK, NY 10036 (US) (52) U.S. Cl. .............................................................. 424/468 (22) Filed: May 19, 2005 A dosage form comprising of a high dose, high Solubility active ingredient as modified release and a low dose active ingredient as immediate release where the weight ratio of Related U.S. Application Data immediate release active ingredient and modified release active ingredient is from 1:10 to 1:15000 and the weight of (63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 10/630,446, modified release active ingredient per unit is from 500 mg to filed on Jul. 29, 2003. 1500 mg, a process for preparing the dosage form. Patent Application Publication Feb. 2, 2006 Sheet 1 of 10 US 2006/0024.365A1 FIGURE 1 FIGURE 2 FIGURE 3 Patent Application Publication Feb. 2, 2006 Sheet 2 of 10 US 2006/0024.365A1 FIGURE 4 (a) 7 FIGURE 4 (b) Patent Application Publication Feb. 2, 2006 Sheet 3 of 10 US 2006/0024.365 A1 FIGURE 5 100 ov -- 60 40 20 C 2 4.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,101,662 B2 Tamarkin Et Al
    USOO91 01662B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,101,662 B2 Tamarkin et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Aug. 11, 2015 (54) COMPOSITIONS WITH MODULATING A61K 47/32 (2013.01); A61 K9/0014 (2013.01); AGENTS A61 K9/0031 (2013.01); A61 K9/0034 (2013.01); A61 K9/0043 (2013.01); A61 K (71) Applicant: Foamix Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Rehovot 9/0046 (2013.01); A61 K9/0048 (2013.01); (IL) A61 K9/0056 (2013.01) (72) Inventors: Dov Tamarkin, Macabim (IL); Meir (58) Field of Classification Search Eini, Ness Ziona (IL); Doron Friedman, CPC ........................................................ A61 K9/12 Karmei Yosef (IL); Tal Berman, Rishon See application file for complete search history. le Ziyyon (IL); David Schuz, Gimzu (IL) (56) References Cited (73) Assignee: Foamix Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Rehovot U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS (IL) 1,159,250 A 11/1915 Moulton (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 1,666,684 A 4, 1928 Carstens patent is extended or adjusted under 35 1924,972 A 8, 1933 Beckert 2,085,733. A T. 1937 Bird U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. 2,390,921 A 12, 1945 Clark This patent is Subject to a terminal dis 2,524,590 A 10, 1950 Boe claimer. 2,586.287 A 2/1952 Apperson 2,617,754 A 1 1/1952 Neely 2,767,712 A 10, 1956 Waterman (21) Appl. No.: 14/045,528 2.968,628 A 1/1961 Reed 3,004,894 A 10/1961 Johnson et al. (22) Filed: Oct. 3, 2013 3,062,715 A 11/1962 Reese et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Ep 2569287 B1
    (19) TZZ _T (11) EP 2 569 287 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: C07D 413/04 (2006.01) C07D 239/46 (2006.01) 09.07.2014 Bulletin 2014/28 (86) International application number: (21) Application number: 11731562.2 PCT/US2011/036245 (22) Date of filing: 12.05.2011 (87) International publication number: WO 2011/143425 (17.11.2011 Gazette 2011/46) (54) COMPOUNDS USEFUL AS INHIBITORS OF ATR KINASE VERBINDUNGEN ALS HEMMER DER ATR-KINASE COMPOSÉS UTILISABLES EN TANT QU’INHIBITEURS DE LA KINASE ATR (84) Designated Contracting States: • VIRANI, Aniza, Nizarali AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB Abingdon GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO Oxfordshire OX144RY (GB) PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR • REAPER, Philip, Michael Abingdon (30) Priority: 12.05.2010 US 333869 P Oxfordshire OX144RY (GB) (43) Date of publication of application: (74) Representative: Coles, Andrea Birgit et al 20.03.2013 Bulletin 2013/12 Kilburn & Strode LLP 20 Red Lion Street (73) Proprietor: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. London WC1R 4PJ (GB) Boston, MA 02210 (US) (56) References cited: (72) Inventors: WO-A1-2010/054398 WO-A1-2010/071837 • CHARRIER, Jean-Damien Abingdon • C. A. HALL-JACKSON: "ATR is a caffeine- Oxfordshire OX144RY (GB) sensitive, DNA-activated protein kinase with a • DURRANT, Steven, John substrate specificity distinct from DNA-PK", Abingdon ONCOGENE, vol. 18, 1999, pages 6707-6713, Oxfordshire OX144RY (GB) XP002665425, cited in the application • KNEGTEL, Ronald, Marcellus Alphonsus Abingdon Oxfordshire OX144RY (GB) Note: Within nine months of the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent in the European Patent Bulletin, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to that patent, in accordance with the Implementing Regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Procarbazine
    Procarbazine DRUG NAME: Procarbazine SYNONYM(S): COMMON TRADE NAME(S): MATULANE® CLASSIFICATION: alkylating agent Special pediatric considerations are noted when applicable, otherwise adult provisions apply. MECHANISM OF ACTION: Procarbazine is a cell cycle phase-nonspecific1 pro-drug and derivative of hydrazine whose mechanism of action has not yet been clearly defined. Procarbazine may act by inhibiting protein, RNA, and DNA synthesis,2-4 and by causing free-radical damage to DNA and inhibition of mitosis.3,5 Procarbazine also has monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibiting properties2,3 and is an immunosuppressive agent.2 Cross resistance with other chemotherapy agents has not been demonstrated.2 PHARMACOKINETICS: Oral Absorption rapid and complete; peak plasma concentration in 1 h Distribution rapid distribution including into liver, kidneys, intestinal wall, and skin3 cross blood brain barrier? yes volume of distribution no information found plasma protein binding no information found Metabolism complex spontaneous chemical decomposition and biotransformation to active metabolites,3,6 primarily in the liver3 via cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase and mitochondrial monoamine oxidase7 active metabolite(s)3,5,6,8 yes; including azo-and methylazoxy-metabolites and hydrogen peroxide inactive metabolite(s)2,9 yes; including N-isopropyl-terephthalmamic acid Excretion primarily hepatic with some renal2,3 and pulmonary10 elimination urine2-4 25-70% in 24 h primarily as N-isopropyl- terephthalmamic acid; <5-20% unchanged feces7 minimal terminal half life3,4
    [Show full text]
  • Methotrexate / Vincristine / Leucovorin / Procarbazine (Cycles 1,3,5)
    Protocol Index IP DEANGELIS WITH RITUXIMAB - METHOTREXATE / VINCRISTINE / LEUCOVORIN / PROCARBAZINE (CYCLES 1,3,5) Types: ONCOLOGY TREATMENT Synonyms: PRIMARY, CENTRAL, CNS, LYMPH, MTX, ONCOV, METHOT, VINCR, PROCARB, DEANGELIS, DEAN, RITUX Cycle 1 Repeat 1 time Cycle length: 14 days Day 1 Perform every 1 day x1 Labs ☑ COMPREHENSIVE METABOLIC PANEL Interval: Once Occurrences: -- ☑ CBC WITH PLATELET AND DIFFERENTIAL Interval: Once Occurrences: -- ☑ MAGNESIUM LEVEL Interval: Once Occurrences: -- ☑ LDH Interval: Once Occurrences: -- ☑ URIC ACID LEVEL Interval: Once Occurrences: -- ☑ PHOSPHORUS LEVEL Interval: Once Occurrences: -- Labs ☑ METHOTREXATE LEVEL Interval: Once Occurrences: -- ☑ PH, URINALYSIS Interval: Conditional Occurrences: -- Frequency Comments: Draw prior to starting Methotrexate and PRN until pH GREATER than 7. Then draw urine pH every day until MTX is LESS than 0.05 Provider Communication ONC PROVIDER COMMUNICATION 58 Interval: Once Occurrences: -- Comments: Prior to beginning Rituxan infusion, please check if a Hepatitis B and C serology has been performed within the past 6 months. Hepatitis B and C serologies results: Push F2:11554001 drawn on ***. Provider Communication ONC PROVIDER COMMUNICATION 5 Interval: Once Occurrences: -- Comments: Use baseline weight to calculate dose. Adjust dose for weight gains/losses of greater than or equal to 10%. Provider Communication ONC PROVIDER COMMUNICATION 12 Interval: Until Occurrences: -- discontinued Comments: Careful monitoring of pulmonary function tests should be performed prior
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Human Fibroblast Interferon on the Antiviral Activity of Mammalian Cells Treated with Bleomycin, Vincristine, Or Mitomycin C1
    [CANCER RESEARCH 43, 5462-5466. November 1983] Effect of Human Fibroblast Interferon on the Antiviral Activity of Mammalian Cells Treated with Bleomycin, Vincristine, or Mitomycin C1 Robert J. Suhadolnik,2 Yosuke Sawada,3 Maryann B. Flick, Nancy L. Reichenbach, and Joseph D. Mosca3 Department of Biochemistry, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140 ABSTRACT protein kinase (2,9,28,34,36). In addition to the use of interferon in the treatment of cancer (1, 11, 12, 29, 34), combination Bleomycin, vincristine, or mitomycin C, when added to HeLa chemotherapy of interferon and methotrexate, c/s-platinum diam- cells simultaneously with human fibroblast interferon (IFN-0), minedichloride, cyclophosphamide, or 1,3-bis(/i-chloroethyl)-1- caused a decrease in cell density and inhibited DMA synthesis nitrosourea on either tumor cells in culture or in leukemic mice compared with HeLa cells treated with IFN-/3 alone. However, has been reported (5, 7, 10, 25). Furthermore, Stolfi ef al. (37) the IFN-0-induced antiviral processes were unaffected by the reported recently that the administration of mouse interferon to presence of these drugs as determined by in vitro enzyme assays mice following the administration of 5-fluorouracil protected the and the development of the antiviral state in the intact HeLa cell. mice from mortality. Because it is possible to selectively inhibit HeLa cells treated with IFN-/Õalone or with IFN-/3 in combination proliferation of tumor cells with chemotherapeutic drugs, we with bleomycin, vincristine, or mitomycin C were able to induce reasoned that the ability of the normal cell to maintain the antiviral the double-stranded RNA-dependent adenosine triphos- phate:2',5'-oligoadenylic acid adenyltransferase (EC 2.2.2.-) and state might be adversely affected by such drugs and that the antiproliferative action of interferons might affect the activity of the double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase.
    [Show full text]
  • Cisplatin, Methotrexate and Bleomycin for Advanced Recurrent Or
    : Ope gy n A lo c ro c d e s n s A Yumura et al., Andrology (Los Angel) 2017, 6:2 Andrology-Open Access DOI: 10.4172/2167-0250.1000194 ISSN: 2167-0250 Research Article Open Access Cisplatin, Methotrexate and Bleomycin for Advanced Recurrent or Metastatic Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma Yumura Y*, Kasuga J, Kawahara T, Miyoshi Y, Hattori Y, Teranishi J, Takamoto D, Mochizuki T and Uemura H Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Japan *Corresponding author: Yasushi Yumura, Departments of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Japan, Tel: +81452615656; Fax: +81452531962; E-mail: [email protected] Received date: December 11, 2017; Accepted date: December 15, 2017; Published date: December 22, 2017 Copyright: © 2017 Yumura Y, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin, methotrexate, and bleomycin (CMB) chemotherapy in patients with advanced, recurrent, or metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC). Methods: The CMB regimen was administered to 12 patients with advanced (n=7), recurrent (n=4), or metastatic (n=1) PSCC. Patients received a total of 21 cycles of CMB between 2002 and 2009, and were retrospectively reviewed for treatment efficacy and toxicity of the drugs. The mean patient age was 61 (61.0 ± 8.7) years. Patients received 20.0 mg/m2 of cisplatin intravenously on days 2-6; 200.0 mg/m2 of methotrexate intravenously on days 1, 15 and 22; and 10.0 mg/m2 of bleomycin as a bolus on days 2-6.
    [Show full text]