DOCSLIB.ORG

Paleontological Technical Report: Northern Integrated Supply Project, Proposed U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PALEONTOLOGICAL TECHNICAL REPORT: NORTHERN INTEGRATED SUPPLY PROJECT, PROPOSED U.S. HIGHWAY 287 REALIGNMENT LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO Prepared for: ERO Resources Corporation 1842 Clarkson Street Denver, CO 80218 Prepared by: Paul C. Murphey, Ph.D. and David Daitch, M.S. Rocky Mountain Paleontology 4614 Lonespur Court Oceanside, CA 92056 303-514-1095; 760-758-4019 www.rockymountainpaleontology.com Prepared under State of Colorado Paleontological Permit 2006-5 Revised October 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Definition and Significance of Paleontological Resources ..................................... 3 3.0 METHODS ......................................................................................................................... 5 4.0 LAWS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS, AND STANDARDS .................................... 6 4.1 Federal..................................................................................................................... 6 4.2 State......................................................................................................................... 8 4.3 County ..................................................................................................................... 8 4.4 City .......................................................................................................................... 8 4.5 Private Lands .......................................................................................................... 9 4.6 Permits and Approvals ............................................................................................ 9 5.0 RESOURCE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA ........................................................................ 10 5.1 Potential Fossil Yield Classification ..................................................................... 10 6.0 PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT ................................................... 11 7.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................ 12 7.1 Geology and Paleontology .................................................................................... 12 7.1.1 Lykins Formation ...................................................................................... 17 7.1.2 Undivided Jelm and Sundance Formations............................................... 17 7.1.3 Morrison Formation .................................................................................. 17 7.1.4 Dakota Group ............................................................................................ 18 7.1.5 Benton Group ............................................................................................ 19 7.1.6 Niobrara Formation ................................................................................... 19 8.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................... 21 8.1 Museum Record Searches ..................................................................................... 21 8.2 Field Survey .......................................................................................................... 22 9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................. 24 10.0 IMPACTS ANALYSIS .................................................................................................... 25 10.1 Direct Impacts ....................................................................................................... 25 10.2 Indirect Impacts .................................................................................................... 26 10.3 Cumulative Impacts .............................................................................................. 26 11.0 MITIGATION MEASURES ............................................................................................ 27 12.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 30 NISP EIS – Paleontological Resources i TABLES Table 1. Summary of Paleontological Laws, Ordinances, Regulations and Standards Applicable to the NISP U.S. 287 Realignment. .......................................................9 Table 2. Summarized Paleontological Sensitivities of Geologic Units within the APE for the Preferred NISP U.S. 287 Western Alternative using the PFYC System (Map Abbreviations are from Braddock et al., 1988a, 1988b). ................11 Table 3. Previously Recorded Fossil Localities from within and Nearby the NISP Study Area. UCM, University of Colorado Museum of Natural History. ............22 Table 4. Fossil Localities Discovered within the Field Survey for the Western Alternative of the NISP U.S. 287 Realignment. Fossil locality coordinates are provided in the confidential appendix. .............................................................23 FIGURES Figure 1. Aerial Photograph of a Portion of the APE for the NISP Showing the U.S. 287 Western and Northern Realignment Alternative Corridors. .....................4 Figure 2. Geologic Map Showing the Approximate Location of the Southern Portion of the NISP U.S. 287 Western Alternative Northwest of Fort Collins, Larimer County, Colorado (from Braddock et al., 1988a). ...................................13 Figure 3. Geologic Map Showing the Approximate Location of the Northern Portion of the NISP U.S. 287 Western Alternative Alignment Northwest of Fort Collins, Larimer County, Colorado (from Braddock et al., 1988a). ......................14 Figure 4. Geologic Map Showing the Approximate Location of the Southern Portion of the NISP U.S. 287 Northern Alternative Alignment Northwest of Fort Collins, Larimer County, Colorado (from Braddock et al., 1988a). ......................15 Figure 5. Geologic Map Showing the Approximate Location of the Northern Portion of the NISP U.S. 287 Northern Alternative Alignment Northwest of Fort Collins, Larimer County, Colorado (from Braddock et al., 1988b). ......................16 APPENDICES Appendix 1 Confidential Fossil Locality Data .........................................................................34 NISP EIS – Paleontological Resources ii 1.0 SUMMARY This is a paleontological assessment of two alternative realignments of U.S. Highway 287 (U.S. 287) for the Northern Integrated Supply Project (NISP). The western and northern alignment alternatives are located within portions of sections 5-8, 17-20, and 29-32, T. 9 N., R. 69 W., and sections 5-8, and 17-18, T. 8 N., R. 69 W. (sixth Principal Meridian), on the USGS Laporte and Livermore 7.5’ topographic quadrangles in Larimer County, Colorado (see Figure 1). Although this report presents the results of the literature and record searches conducted for both realignment alternatives, the field survey included only the preferred alternative of the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT), the western alternative. This alternative, which is approximately seven miles long, was surveyed for paleontological resources on January 23 and April 16, 2006. The survey corridor was approximately 200 feet wide (100 feet on either side of centerline). For this study, the Area of Potential Effect (APE) is defined as both the western and northern alternatives, for which literature and museum record searches were conducted. The survey corridor is defined as the preferred alignment for which a pedestrian field survey was conducted, and the width of the corridor was designed to encompass the maximum area of surface disturbance associated with highway construction. The paleontological sensitivities of the geologic units within the APE for the U.S. 287 western and northern realignment alternatives associated with NISP were evaluated by reviewing scientific and technical literature, geologic mapping and museum records. Based on the geologic mapping of Braddock et al. (1988a, 1988b), the study area contains six bedrock geologic units ranging in age from Permian to Cretaceous. These units include, from stratigraphically lowest to highest, the Upper Permian to Lower Triassic Lykins Formation, the Upper Triassic Jelm Formation and Upper and Middle Jurassic Sundance Formation undivided, the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, the Lower Cretaceous Dakota Group, the Lower Cretaceous Benton Group, and the Upper Cretaceous Niobrara Formation. All of these units are known to contain fossils of various taxonomic affinities and abundances across their distribution. At least four previously recorded fossil localities occur within or nearby the APE for NISP western and northern alignment alternatives. Fossil localities are sites where fossils have been previously documented. However, none of these are located within the western alignment. These include University of Colorado Museum localities 86050, from which dinosaur fossils were collected from the Morrison Formation; 87092, from which sharks teeth were collected from the Smoky Hill Member of the Niobrara Formation; and 88015, from which inoceramid clams were collected from the South Platte Formation of the Dakota Group. Locality 86050 is also the type locality for a species of freshwater sponge described by Dunagan (1999). Waage (1955) reported plesiosaur vertebrae in the Dakota Group northeast of Laporte
Recommended publications
  • Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Mid-Cretaceous Rocks in Minnesota and Contiguous Areas

    Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Mid-Cretaceous Rocks in Minnesota and Contiguous Areas

    Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Mid-Cretaceous Rocks in Minnesota and Contiguous Areas GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1253 Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Mid-Cretaceous Rocks in Minnesota and Contiguous Areas By WILLIAM A. COBBAN and E. A. MEREWETHER Molluscan Fossil Record from the Northeastern Part of the Upper Cretaceous Seaway, Western Interior By WILLIAM A. COBBAN Lower Upper Cretaceous Strata in Minnesota and Adjacent Areas-Time-Stratigraphic Correlations. and Structural Attitudes By E. A. M EREWETHER GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1 2 53 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1983 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Cobban, William Aubrey, 1916 Stratigraphy and paleontology of mid-Cretaceous rocks in Minnesota and contiguous areas. (Geological Survey Professional Paper 1253) Bibliography: 52 p. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.16 A. Molluscan fossil record from the northeastern part of the Upper Cretaceous seaway, Western Interior by William A. Cobban. B. Lower Upper Cretaceous strata in Minnesota and adjacent areas-time-stratigraphic correlations and structural attitudes by E. A. Merewether. I. Mollusks, Fossil-Middle West. 2. Geology, Stratigraphic-Cretaceous. 3. Geology-Middle West. 4. Paleontology-Cretaceous. 5. Paleontology-Middle West. I. Merewether, E. A. (Edward Allen), 1930. II. Title. III. Series. QE687.C6 551.7'7'09776 81--607803 AACR2 For sale by the Distribution Branch, U.S.
  • Morrison Formation 37 Cretaceous System 48 Cloverly Formation 48 Sykes Mountain Formation 51 Thermopolis Shale 55 Mowry Shale 56

    Morrison Formation 37 Cretaceous System 48 Cloverly Formation 48 Sykes Mountain Formation 51 Thermopolis Shale 55 Mowry Shale 56

    THE STRUCTURAL AND STRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK OF THE WARM SPRINGS RANCH AREA, HOT SPRINGS COUNTY, WYOMING By CHRISTOPHER JAY CARSON Bachelor of Science Oklahoma State University 1998 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE July, 2000 THE STRUCTURAL AND STRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK OF THE WARM SPRINGS RANCH AREA, HOT SPRINGS COUNTY, WYOMING Thesis Approved: Thesis Advisor ~~L. ... ~. ----'-"'-....D~e~e:.-g-e----- II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express appreciation to my advisor Dr. Arthur Cleaves for providing me with the opportunity to compile this thesis, and his help carrying out the fieldwork portion of the thesis. My sincere appreciation is extended to my advisory committee members: Dr. Stan Paxton, Dr. Gary Stewart, and Mr. David Schmude. I wish to thank Mr. Schmude especially for the great deal of personal effort he put forth toward the completion of this thesis. His efforts included financial, and time contributions, along with invaluable injections of enthusiasm, advice, and friendship. I extend my most sincere thank you to Dr. Burkhard Pohl, The Big Hom Basin Foundation, and the Wyoming Dinosaur Center. Without whose input and financial support this thesis would not have been possible. In conjunction I would like to thank the staff of the Wyoming Dinosaur Center for the great deal of help that I received during my stay in Thermopolis. Finally I wish to thank my friends and family. To my friends who have pursued this process before me, and with me; thank you very much.
  • DPSC Hogback Parking Facility

    DPSC Hogback Parking Facility

    Diamond Pro Stone Cut® RETAINING wAll sysTEm project profile the design used a multipiece system to mimic area rock outcroppings. four custom colors were used in the wall to show a sweeping motion near the top, which blends seamlessly with the surrounding scenery. Hogback Parking Facility GoldEN, coloRAdo ProDUcT insTallEr ThE challEngE Diamond Pro Stone Cut® HTM Construction Expand parking, upgrade drainage, add landscaping, meet high retaining wall system Lakewood, Colorado aesthetic standards and construct the project without closing the nearby Interstate highway exits were just a few of the manUFACTUrEr ProjEcT sizE challenges faced by the team that led the improvement of a Pavestone Company 28,000 square feet “park and ride” facility outside Denver, just off Interstate 70 and Henderson, Colorado U.S. Highway 40. The area known as the Dakota Hogback in the Rocky Mountain foothills had been a popular parking place for WALL DEsignEr Denver commuters and mountain-bound outdoor enthusiasts J.F. Sato and Associates for years before the Colorado Department of Transportation Denver, Colorado and Jefferson County decided to update the facility. anchorwall.com Diamond Pro Stone Cut® RETAINING wAll sysTEm project profile ThE solUTion Designed by Denver engineering firm J.F. Sato and Associates, the Hogback retaining wall was engineered to be both functional and aesthetically pleasing. Colorado DOT Project Manager Martin Herbaugh described the choice of the Diamond Pro Stone Cut® retaining wall system for the wall as the perfect solution that best met the requirements of the project. The designer chose the product because of its multiple pieces and rough-looking appearance that complement the Rocky Mountain landscape.
  • Annotated Checklist of Fossil Fishes from the Smoky Hill Chalk of the Niobrara Chalk (Upper Cretaceous) in Kansas

    Annotated Checklist of Fossil Fishes from the Smoky Hill Chalk of the Niobrara Chalk (Upper Cretaceous) in Kansas

    Lucas, S. G. and Sullivan, R.M., eds., 2006, Late Cretaceous vertebrates from the Western Interior. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 35. 193 ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF FOSSIL FISHES FROM THE SMOKY HILL CHALK OF THE NIOBRARA CHALK (UPPER CRETACEOUS) IN KANSAS KENSHU SHIMADA1 AND CHRISTOPHER FIELITZ2 1Environmental Science Program and Department of Biological Sciences, DePaul University,2325 North Clifton Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60614; and Sternberg Museum of Natural History, Fort Hays State University, 3000 Sternberg Drive, Hays, Kansas 67601;2Department of Biology, Emory & Henry College, P.O. Box 947, Emory, Virginia 24327 Abstract—The Smoky Hill Chalk Member of the Niobrara Chalk is an Upper Cretaceous marine deposit found in Kansas and adjacent states in North America. The rock, which was formed under the Western Interior Sea, has a long history of yielding spectacular fossil marine vertebrates, including fishes. Here, we present an annotated taxo- nomic list of fossil fishes (= non-tetrapod vertebrates) described from the Smoky Hill Chalk based on published records. Our study shows that there are a total of 643 referable paleoichthyological specimens from the Smoky Hill Chalk documented in literature of which 133 belong to chondrichthyans and 510 to osteichthyans. These 643 specimens support the occurrence of a minimum of 70 species, comprising at least 16 chondrichthyans and 54 osteichthyans. Of these 70 species, 44 are represented by type specimens from the Smoky Hill Chalk. However, it must be noted that the fossil record of Niobrara fishes shows evidence of preservation, collecting, and research biases, and that the paleofauna is a time-averaged assemblage over five million years of chalk deposition.
  • Rival Species Recast Significance of 'First Bird'

    Rival Species Recast Significance of 'First Bird'

    NEWS IN FOCUS PALAEONTOLOGY Rival species recast significance of ‘first bird’ Archaeopteryx’s status is changing, but the animal is still key to the dinosaur–bird transition. BY EWEN CALLAWAY bird,” says Gareth Dyke, a vertebrate palaeon- brains of Archaeopteryx and a variety of dino- tologist at the University of Southampton, UK. saurs related to it were, like modern birds, all he iconic status of Archaeopteryx, the “They’d rather cut off one of their legs than relatively large for their body sizes. Because SCIENCE first animal discovered with both bird admit it has nothing to do with bird origins.” earlier dinosaurs did not fly as well as modern and dinosaur features, is under attack. New specimens of Archaeopteryx are birds, if they flew at all, the finding suggests that TMore-recently discovered rival species show also reinvigorating research. There are now the brain expansion occurred well before flight a similar mix of traits. But Archaeopteryx still 12 known fossils of the creature, and at the emerged. It is yet another clue that Archaeop- hogged the opening symposium at the 2014 symposium Kundrat unveiled the first scien- teryx may not have been any more bird-like VLADIMIR NIKOLOV. SILHOUETTE: Society of Vertebrate Paleontology meeting tific description of the eighth to be discovered. than other suggested transitional species. “It’s in Berlin last month, and even festooned the Researchers lost track of the ‘phantom’ after it another piece of data that has taken away from official conference beer glasses. was found in Germany in the early 1990s, until the specialness of Archaeopteryx,” says Balanoff.
  • A Mysterious Giant Ichthyosaur from the Lowermost Jurassic of Wales

    A Mysterious Giant Ichthyosaur from the Lowermost Jurassic of Wales

    A mysterious giant ichthyosaur from the lowermost Jurassic of Wales JEREMY E. MARTIN, PEGGY VINCENT, GUILLAUME SUAN, TOM SHARPE, PETER HODGES, MATT WILLIAMS, CINDY HOWELLS, and VALENTIN FISCHER Ichthyosaurs rapidly diversified and colonised a wide range vians may challenge our understanding of their evolutionary of ecological niches during the Early and Middle Triassic history. period, but experienced a major decline in diversity near the Here we describe a radius of exceptional size, collected at end of the Triassic. Timing and causes of this demise and the Penarth on the coast of south Wales near Cardiff, UK. This subsequent rapid radiation of the diverse, but less disparate, specimen is comparable in morphology and size to the radius parvipelvian ichthyosaurs are still unknown, notably be- of shastasaurids, and it is likely that it comes from a strati- cause of inadequate sampling in strata of latest Triassic age. graphic horizon considerably younger than the last definite Here, we describe an exceptionally large radius from Lower occurrence of this family, the middle Norian (Motani 2005), Jurassic deposits at Penarth near Cardiff, south Wales (UK) although remains attributable to shastasaurid-like forms from the morphology of which places it within the giant Triassic the Rhaetian of France were mentioned by Bardet et al. (1999) shastasaurids. A tentative total body size estimate, based on and very recently by Fischer et al. (2014). a regression analysis of various complete ichthyosaur skele- Institutional abbreviations.—BRLSI, Bath Royal Literary tons, yields a value of 12–15 m. The specimen is substantially and Scientific Institution, Bath, UK; NHM, Natural History younger than any previously reported last known occur- Museum, London, UK; NMW, National Museum of Wales, rences of shastasaurids and implies a Lazarus range in the Cardiff, UK; SMNS, Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, lowermost Jurassic for this ichthyosaur morphotype.
  • [PDF] Dinosaur Eggshell from the Red Sandstone Group of Tanzania

    [PDF] Dinosaur Eggshell from the Red Sandstone Group of Tanzania

    Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 24(2):494±497, June 2004 q 2004 by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology NOTE DINOSAUR EGGSHELL FROM THE RED SANDSTONE GROUP OF TANZANIA MICHAEL D. GOTTFRIED1, PATRICK M. O'CONNOR2, FRANKIE D. JACKSON3, ERIC M. ROBERTS4, and REMEGIUS CHAMI5, 1Mich- igan State University Museum, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824, [email protected]; 2College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, 45701; 3Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, 59717; 4Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112, 5Antiquities Unit, P.O. Box 2280, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Investigations over the last several decades at Gondwanan Mesozoic Although the age of the Red Sandstone Group is poorly understood (see localities have signi®cantly expanded our knowledge of the diversity Damblon et al., 1998), a Cretaceous age is suggested at this site based and distribution of Southern Hemisphere dinosaurs. These records are on (1) the overall composition of the fauna, which includes titanosaurid? primarily based on skeletal remains, but included among them are in- sauropods and both avian and nonavian theropods, as well as osteo- stances of preserved eggshell, notably from Argentina (e.g., Calvo et glossomorph ®shes, and (2) the possibility that these deposits may be al., 1997; Chiappe et al., 1998) and India (e.g., Khosla and Sahni, 1995). approximately coeval with the Cretaceous dinosaur beds of Malawi (Ja- In general, however, dinosaur eggshell is relatively poorly known from cobs et al., 1990), which lie ca. 200 km southeast of the Mbeya region. Gondwana, and from Africa in particular.
  • Geology and Ground-Water Resources of San Miguel County, New Mexico

    Geology and Ground-Water Resources of San Miguel County, New Mexico

    GEOLOGY AND GROUND - WATER RESOURCES OF SAN MIGUEL COUNTY, NEW MEXICO GROUND-WATER REPORT 2 Geology and Ground-Water Resources of San Miguel County, New Mexico BY R. L. GRIGGS AND G. E. HENDRICKSON Prepared in cooperation with The United States Bureau of Reclamation New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources and the New Mexico State Engineer NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES SOCORRO 1951 NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY E. J. Workman, President STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Eugene Callaghan, Director THE REGENTS MEMBERS EX-OFFICIO The Honorable Edwin L. Mechem ...................... Governor of New Mexico Tom Wiley ............................................... Superintendent of Public Instruction APPOINTED MEMBERS Thomas M. Cramer, President ...................................................... Carlsbad Holm 0. Bursum, Jr., Secretary-Treasurer ........................................ Socorro Frank C. DiLuzio ..................................................................... Los Alamos A. A. Kemnitz .................................................................................... Hobbs Cooper Shapley ............................................................................... Deming Contents Page ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................. 9 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 11 Location, area, and accessibility 11 Previous investigations
  • Denudation History and Internal Structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, Based on Apatite-Fission-Track Thermoc

    Denudation History and Internal Structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, Based on Apatite-Fission-Track Thermoc

    NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF GEOLOGY & MINERAL RESOURCES, BULLETIN 160, 2004 41 Denudation history and internal structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, based on apatite­fission­track thermochronology 1 2 1Department of Earth and Environmental Science, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801Shari A. Kelley and Charles E. Chapin 2New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801 Abstract An apatite fission­track (AFT) partial annealing zone (PAZ) that developed during Late Cretaceous time provides a structural datum for addressing questions concerning the timing and magnitude of denudation, as well as the structural style of Laramide deformation, in the Front Range and Wet Mountains of Colorado. AFT cooling ages are also used to estimate the magnitude and sense of dis­ placement across faults and to differentiate between exhumation and fault­generated topography. AFT ages at low elevationX along the eastern margin of the southern Front Range between Golden and Colorado Springs are from 100 to 270 Ma, and the mean track lengths are short (10–12.5 µm). Old AFT ages (> 100 Ma) are also found along the western margin of the Front Range along the Elkhorn thrust fault. In contrast AFT ages of 45–75 Ma and relatively long mean track lengths (12.5–14 µm) are common in the interior of the range. The AFT ages generally decrease across northwest­trending faults toward the center of the range. The base of a fossil PAZ, which separates AFT cooling ages of 45– 70 Ma at low elevations from AFT ages > 100 Ma at higher elevations, is exposed on the south side of Pikes Peak, on Mt.
  • KENNETH CARPENTER, Ph.D. Director and Curator Of

    KENNETH CARPENTER, Ph.D. Director and Curator Of

    KENNETH CARPENTER, Ph.D. Director and Curator of Paleontology Prehistoric Museum Utah State University - College of Eastern Utah 155 East Main Street Price, Utah 84501 Education May, 1996. Ph.D., Geology University of Colorado, Boulder, CO. Dissertation “Sharon Springs Member, Pierre Shale (Lower Campanian) depositional environment and origin of it' s Vertebrate fauna, with a review of North American plesiosaurs” 251 p. May, 1980. B.S. in Geology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO. Aug-Dec. 1977 Apprenticeship, Smithsonian Inst., Washington DC Professional Museum Experience 1975 – 1980: University of Colorado Museum, Boulder, CO. 1983 – 1984: Mississippi Museum of Natural History, Jackson, MS. 1984 – 1986: Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Philadelphia. 1986: Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, PA. 1986: Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, Norman, OK. 1987 – 1989: Museum of the Rockies, Bozeman, MT. 1989 – 1996: Chief Preparator, Denver Museum of Nature and Science, Denver, CO. 1996 – 2010: Chief Preparator, and Curator of Vertebrate Paleontology, Denver Museum of Nature and Science, Denver, CO. 2006 – 2007; 2008-2009: Acting Department Head, Chief Preparator, and Curator of Vertebrate Paleontology, Denver Museum of Nature and Science, Denver, CO. 2010 – present: Director, Prehistoric Museum, Price, UT 2010 – present: Associate Vice Chancellor, Utah State University Professional Services: 1991 – 1998: Science Advisor, Garden Park Paleontological Society 1994: Senior Organizer, Symposium "The Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation: An Interdisciplinary Study" 1996: Scientific Consultant Walking With Dinosaurs , BBC, England 2000: Scientific Consultant Ballad of Big Al , BBC, England 2000 – 2003: Associate Editor, Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 2001 – 2003: Associate Editor, Earth Sciences History journal 2003 – present: Scientific Advisor, HAN Project 21 Dinosaur Expos, Tokyo, Japan.
  • S-1/GEOH/CC-1/19 (Honours)

    S-1/GEOH/CC-1/19 (Honours)

    S-1/GEOH/CC-1/19 TDP (Honours) 1st Semester Exam., 2019 GEOGRAPHY (Honours) FIRST PAPER (CC-1) (Physical Geography) Full Marks : 60 Time:3 Hours The figures in the margin indicate full marks. Candidates are required to give their answers in their own words as far as practicable. Section A 1. Answer any sir ofthe following questions: 2x6-12 : (a) Mention any two causes of earthquake. b) Distinguish between cuesta and hogback. (c) Differentiate between Sial and Sima. (d) Distinguish between earth flow and mud flow. (e)What do you understand by line of compensation'? [ Turn Over ] B1/23-150 (2) What is tombolo? (3 Or, Define the tem 'cycle of erosion'. b) What is the difference between magma and lava? between Write the h) Distinguish corrasion and attrition. characteristics of the of volcanoes with sketches. following types Section - B 3+(3+3+3)=12 Hawaiian type Answer the following questions 12x4-48 G) Vulcanian type 2. (a) Discuss the interior structure of the earth according to Suess. What are the characteristics i) Fissure type. of Igneous rocks? Describe the landformns 4. (a) Detfine in produced by intrusive Ilgneous rocks with neat Geomorphology. "Complexity landforms is more common than simplicity" - Explain the sketches. 4+4+4-12 statement. What are the different erosional processes of river and glacier? Or 2+5+5-12 (6) Write the concept of Isostasy. Explain Airy's Or, concept on Isostasy. Write a note on global (6) What do you mean by slope development? Write Isostatic adjustment. 2+5+5=12 the concept of slope development proposed by L.C.
  • Chronostratigraphy and New Vertebrate Sites from the Upper Maastrichtian of Huesca (Spain), and Their Relation with the K/Pg Boundary

    Chronostratigraphy and New Vertebrate Sites from the Upper Maastrichtian of Huesca (Spain), and Their Relation with the K/Pg Boundary

    Accepted Manuscript Chronostratigraphy and new vertebrate sites from the upper Maastrichtian of Huesca (Spain), and their relation with the K/Pg boundary E. Puértolas-Pascual, I. Arenillas, J.A. Arz, P. Calvín, L. Ezquerro, C. García-Vicente, M. Pérez-Pueyo, E.M. Sánchez-Moreno, J.J. Villalaín, J.I. Canudo PII: S0195-6671(17)30487-1 DOI: 10.1016/j.cretres.2018.02.016 Reference: YCRES 3817 To appear in: Cretaceous Research Received Date: 9 November 2017 Revised Date: 24 January 2018 Accepted Date: 22 February 2018 Please cite this article as: Puértolas-Pascual, E., Arenillas, I., Arz, J.A., Calvín, P., Ezquerro, L., García- Vicente, C., Pérez-Pueyo, M., Sánchez-Moreno, E.M., Villalaín, J.J., Canudo, J.I., Chronostratigraphy and new vertebrate sites from the upper Maastrichtian of Huesca (Spain), and their relation with the K/ Pg boundary, Cretaceous Research (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2018.02.016. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Chronostratigraphy and new vertebrate sites from the upper Maastrichtian of Huesca (Spain), and their relation with the K/Pg boundary E. Puértolas-Pascual1,4, I. Arenillas5, J.A. Arz5, P. Calvín2, L.