Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 06/15 Aktuelles Aus Israelischen Tageszeitungen

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 06/15 Aktuelles Aus Israelischen Tageszeitungen Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 06/15 Aktuelles aus israelischen Tageszeitungen 01.- 15. März Die Themen dieser Ausgabe 1. Vorgezogene Neuwahlen ................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Netanyahus Rede vor dem US-Kongress ........................................................................................................ 4 3. Dokument über geheime Friedensverhandlungen enthüllt............................................................................... 5 4. Medienquerschnitt ............................................................................................................................................ 6 1. Vorgezogene Neuwahlen has not produced a charismatic leader that Israelis In der letzten Runde vor den vorgezogenen Parla- who do want a change can enthusiastically back. mentswahlen konnte das Mitte-Links Bündnis Zio- Herzog and Livni, while running neck and neck in nistisches Lager laut Umfragen seinen Vorsprung the polls with the Likud, have not generated the fer- zum konservativen Likud des amtierenden Regie- vor and passion that could have made them the rungschefs Benjamin Netanyahu weiter ausbauen. front-runners in the campaign. Instead, they have for Mehrere Reden im Verlauf einer Kundgebung der the most part campaigned on a similar “anyone but Gegner Netanyahus, die sich unter dem Motto „Wir Bibi” platform (…). It’s a shame that they haven’t lösen die Regierung ab“ in Tel Aviv versammelt hat- been able to offer a campaign of hope instead of a ten, verärgerten die Rechten. Umgekehrt sorgte ein negative message. (…) This campaign season has Wahlspot, in dem Netanyahu die Hafenarbeiter, das been one of the most uneventful and uninspiring in Personal des öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunks und recent memory. The days when voters gathered to Hamas-Terroristen auf eine Ebene stellte, für Zorn raptly watch the party election TV ads, party volun- bei den Linken. Unmut und Enttäuschung herrsch- teers jammed intersections handing out flyers, and ten in den Reihen von Meretz, nachdem die Vereinte huge banners dotted the country’s landscape are Liste der arabischen und der antizionistischen Par- largely of a bygone era. (…) despite the country teien ein Abkommen mit der „zionistischen“ Meretz being led for the last six years by the same person, über die Überschussvoten ablehnte. Bei der Wahl a viable alternative with broad-ranging appeal has am 17.3.15 machte am Ende der Likud zur großen not emerged. Überraschung aller Wahlanalysten mit großem Vor- Editorial, JPO. 08.03.15 sprung das Rennen und erhielt 30 Mandate. Das Zionistische Lager musste sich mit 24 Mandaten Between amulet kissers and 'Hamasniks,' elec- begnügen. Die Vereinte Liste wurde mit 13 Manda- tion campaign going downhill ten drittstärkste Partei in der neuen Knesset. I kiss the mezuzah. Sometimes. (…) It's a habit. (…) According to Israeli artist Yair Garbuz, that makes The final week me part of a dark "handful" which has taken over the (…) Since the days of former prime ministers country. (…) I have news for Garbuz. (…) This Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres, the Center-Left "handful" is made up of people, including downtrod- 1 den people. They carry this country on their shoul- Hayehudi in the shape of the Islamic Movement. (…) ders. Some of them vote for the right. Some of them If the choice is between a vote that will give Meretz vote for the center and even for the left. (…) Most a Knesset seat or a vote that will give another seat mezuzah kissers are working people. They didn't to the Arabs from the Joint List who are the counter- even have time to recover from Garbuz's arrogant, parts of Habayit Hayehudi or Yisrael Beiteinu, then patronizing, racist blow, when they found out that the proper choice of every responsible citizen is they are not only dark. They are part of a group clearly Meretz. Every vote for Meretz is a sure vote which also includes Hamas members. That's what for separating religion and state, for civil equality the Likud's horrifying clip succeeded in producing. and equality between the sexes. Every vote for Mer- (…) This isn't Hamas' first appearance in the elec- etz is a sure vote for social justice, cultural and na- tion campaign. It was already attached in earlier tional justice, freedom of expression and freedom of stages to Prof. Yossi Yona of the Zionist Union. (…) thought. And above all, every vote for Meretz is a Likud was forced to attach Hamas not only to a dove certain vote for the peace we all aspire to. (…) like Yossi Yona, but also to those who are part of Salman Masalha, HAA, 12.03.15 organized labor. (…) Netanyahu is a prime minister. (…) He is supposed to be the responsible adult. (…) Save Meretz, save your soul Ben Dror-Yemini, JED, 10.03.15 The size of the biggest party is critical this time, but if four Knesset seats are “lost” because Meretz fails Meir Dagan is a true patriot to pass the vote threshold, there will be no electoral Anyone who is capable of comparing dock workers upset. (…) Therefore, supporters of both Meretz and and Israel Broadcasting Authority employees – in- the Joint List — who were justifiably appalled by the cluding people who fought in Israel's wars – to Ha- alliance of Arab parties’ separatist error of refusing a mas terrorists, is also capable of turning Meir Dagan surplus-votes agreement with Meretz — must see to – who was wounded twice in wars and operations, it that Meretz exceeds the threshold, for the sake of received a Medal of Courage and led bold opera- the upset. (…) This time it’s possible: The desire not tions in the IDF and the Mossad – into an ungrateful to vote for Netanyahu is enormous. (…) This is no leftist (is that a bad word?) and almost an enemy of time for hesitation or idle chatter. Either you help Israel. (…) if Dagan is a 'leftist' by nature, then Meretz pass the threshold or you vote for Herzog. Netanyahu and the Likud spokespersons secretly There is no other choice. If even one person who hold a membership card in the joint Arab list. (…) wants an upset to stop the extremism votes Lapid, Dagan has done more about the Iranian issue (…) heaven will have no mercy on us. than Netanyahu and all the other Likud spokesper- Sefi Rachlevsky, HAA, 10.03.15 sons combined. (…) One can agree or disagree with Dagan. (…) But why stoop so low? (…) Israel's new existential threat – Ayman Odeh Yuval Diskin, JED, 11.03.15 (…) Ayman Odeh represents a new stage in the struggle of the Arab population in Israel. (..) Today, Why I’m voting Meretz and not for the Arab ticket the Arabs in Israel seek to be a major force in de- The actions of the Joint List of Arab parties for the termining the country’s future. They are calling on Knesset over the question of a surplus votes their allies, who are a decisive majority in the state, agreement with Meretz was the straw that broke the to unite in order to further their common interests. camel’s back for me. Meretz was willing to cancel its After all, in Israel a handful of old rich men have the surplus votes agreement with the Zionist Union to state by the throat while an overwhelming majority of sign such an agreement with the Joint List, just to the population – from the Bedouin living in unrecog- prevent tens of thousands of votes from going to nized villages in the Negev to the slum-dwellers and waste – but the Joint List refused. (…) When Islam- middle-class denizens of Tel Aviv – are humiliated ist imams declare in the Arab media that a vote for every time they go to the supermarket or try to find the Joint List will bring down the rule of the right, yet an apartment they can afford. And then, along the Joint List includes an Islamic Movement whose comes Ayman Odeh and says: I propose an alliance candidates live a polygamous life, I wonder which of the disadvantaged. Why is that a bad thing? (…) right they are talking about. (…) the Joint List in- On (…) Channel 2, the socialite, investor and media cludes not only the equivalent of Yisrael Beiteinu of personality Judy Shalom Nir Mozes (…) said that the Arab street, in the form of the Arab nationalism Odeh was a dangerous man. Soon they’ll be saying of Balad; but also the racist parallel of Habayit that he’s behind the Arab-Jewish solidarity terror. 2 And so, after the Iranian threat disappears, we will, implies. Conversely, if Habayit Hayehudi receives 11 God willing, have a new existential threat called Ay- or 12 seats, its position as a senior partner in a right- man Odeh. wing coalition would be assured. So it would be best Oudeh Basharat, HAA, 01.03.15 for Bennett to focus on winning back voters from Yesh Atid, rather than attacking Netanyahu and To win, Herzog must convince Israelis that Likud (…). Instead of working to build basic trust peace, prosperity are intertwined with Netanyahu, Bennett is using a phony report to (…) How long will it take before the descendants of slam him. What a shame, as this is not the way to the Mizrahi residents of the immigrant transit camps build a strong right-wing bloc. of the 1950s get rid of the sorrow of those hard Dr. Haim Shine, IHY, 09.03.15 years and stop placing all the sins of Mapai at the doorstep of today’s Labor Party? (…) does anyone Israelis want a different political agenda know how the people being thrown out of public (…) Growing numbers of young people are ready to housing these days are going to vote? Why don’t turn their backs on the hard right, as characterized they remember the key role Ran Cohen’s Meretz by the Likud leader, Prime Minister Benjamin “Bibi” had in the Public Housing Law and the battle its Netanyahu, and Habayit Hayehudi chairman Naftali current leaders are waging for same goal? And what Bennett.
Recommended publications
  • Israel: Background and U.S
    Israel: Background and U.S. Relations in Brief Updated September 20, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44245 SUMMARY R44245 Israel: Background and U.S. Relations in Brief September 20, 2019 The following matters are of particular significance to U.S.-Israel relations: Jim Zanotti Israel’s ability to address threats. Israel relies on a number of strengths—including Specialist in Middle regional conventional military superiority—to manage potential threats to its security, Eastern Affairs including evolving asymmetric threats such as rockets and missiles, cross-border tunneling, drones, and cyberattacks. Additionally, Israel has an undeclared but presumed nuclear weapons capability. Against a backdrop of strong bilateral cooperation, Israel’s leaders and supporters routinely make the case that Israel’s security and the broader stability of the region remain critically important for U.S. interests. A 10-year bilateral military aid memorandum of understanding (MOU)— signed in 2016—commits the United States to provide Israel $3.3 billion in Foreign Military Financing annually from FY2019 to FY2028, along with additional amounts from Defense Department accounts for missile defense. All of these amounts remain subject to congressional appropriations. Some Members of Congress criticize various Israeli actions and U.S. policies regarding Israel. In recent months, U.S. officials have expressed some security- related concerns about China-Israel commercial activity. Iran and the region. Israeli officials seek to counter Iranian regional influence and prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. In April 2018, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu presented historical information about Iran’s nuclear program that Israeli intelligence apparently seized from an Iranian archive.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom in the World 2019
    Freedom in the World 2019 https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2019/israel A. ELECTORAL PROCESS: 12 / 12 A1. Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 A largely ceremonial president is elected by the Knesset for one seven-year term. In 2014, Reuven Rivlin of the right-leaning Likud party was elected to replace outgoing president Shimon Peres, receiving 63 votes in a runoff against Meir Sheetrit of the centrist Hatnuah party. The prime minister is usually the leader of the largest faction in the Knesset. In 2014, in a bid to create more stable governing coalitions, the electoral threshold for parties to win representation was raised from 2 percent to 3.25 percent, and the no- confidence procedure was revised so that opponents hoping to oust a sitting government must simultaneously vote in a new one. The incumbent prime minister in 2018, Benjamin Netanyahu of the conservative party Likud, had been in office since 2009, most recently securing reelection after the 2015 parliamentary polls. A2. Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 Members of the 120-seat Knesset are elected by party-list proportional representation for four-year terms, and elections are typically free and fair. In the 2015 contest, Likud secured 30 seats, followed by the center-left Zionist Union with 24. The Joint List—a coalition of parties representing Arab citizens of Israel, who often identify as Palestinian—earned 13 seats; the centrist Yesh Atid (There Is a Future), 11; Kulanu, also centrist, 10; Habayit Hayehudi (Jewish Home), 8; the ultra- Orthodox parties Shas and United Torah Judaism, 7 and 6, respectively; the right- wing Yisrael Beiteinu, 6; and the left-wing Meretz party, 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel 8; World 0 GENEVA, Nov
    Editorials ..................................... 4A Op-Ed .......................................... 5A Calendar ...................................... 6A Scene Around ............................. 9A Synagogue Directory ................ 11A News Briefs ............................... 13A WWW.HERITAGEFL.COM YEAR 44, NO. 12 NOVEMBER 22, 2019 24 CHESHVAN, 5780 ORLANDO, FLORIDA SINGLE COPY 75¢ UN condemnation: Israel 8; world 0 GENEVA, Nov. 15, 2019—A against Israel by December, United Nations General As- the same European nations sembly committee today have failed to introduce a adopted eight resolutions that single UNGA resolution on single out or condemn Is- the human rights situation rael, and zero on the entire in China, Venezuela, Saudi rest of the world. Arabia, Belarus, Cuba, Turkey, The texts condemn Is- Pakistan, Vietnam, Algeria, rael for “repressive measures” or on 175 other countries,” against Syrian citizens in the said Neuer. Golan Heights, renew the Earlier this year, 155 Ger- mandate of the corrupt UN man MPs called on the Ger- Relief and Works Agency, and man government to “dissoci- renew the mandate of the UN’s ate from unilateral, primarily “special committee to inves- politically motivated initia- tigate Israeli practices affect- tives and alliances of anti- ing the human rights of the Israeli Member States, and Yonatan Sindel/Flash90 Palestinian people and other protect Israel and legitimate An Iron Dome air-defense system set up in Sderot in southern Israel near the border with Gaza on Nov. 13, 2019. Arabs of the Occupied Terri- Israeli interests from unilat- tories.” All 193 UN member eral condemnation” in the states belong to the Special UN. In 2017, Dutch parlia- Israel waits to see if Gaza Strip stabilizes Political and Decolonization ment resolved to “actively Committee, or Fourth Com- oppose UN organizations By Yaakov Lappin Strip.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace Between Israel and the Palestinians Appears to Be As Elusive As Ever. Following the Most Recent Collapse of American-Broke
    38 REVIVING THE ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN PEACE PROCESS: HISTORICAL LES- SONS FOR THE MARCH 2015 ISRAELI ELECTIONS Elijah Jatovsky Lessons derived from the successes that led to the signing of the 1993 Declaration of Principles between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization highlight modern criteria by which a debilitated Israeli-Palestinian peace process can be revitalized. Writ- ten in the run-up to the March 2015 Israeli elections, this article examines a scenario for the emergence of a security-credentialed leadership of the Israeli Center-Left. Such leadership did not in fact emerge in this election cycle. However, should this occur in the future, this paper proposes a Plan A, whereby Israel submits a generous two-state deal to the Palestinians based roughly on that of Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s offer in 2008. Should Palestinians find this offer unacceptable whether due to reservations on borders, Jerusalem or refugees, this paper proposes a Plan B by which Israel would conduct a staged, unilateral withdrawal from large areas of the West Bank to preserve the viability of a two-state solution. INTRODUCTION Peace between Israel and the Palestinians appears to be as elusive as ever. Following the most recent collapse of American-brokered negotiations in April 2014, Palestinians announced they would revert to pursuing statehood through the United Nations (UN), a move Israel vehemently opposes. A UN Security Council (UNSC) vote on some form of a proposal calling for an end to “Israeli occupation in the West Bank” by 2016 is expected later this month.1 In July 2014, a two-month war between Hamas-controlled Gaza and Israel broke out, claiming the lives of over 2,100 Gazans (this number encompassing both combatants and civilians), 66 Israeli soldiers and seven Israeli civilians—the low number of Israeli civilians credited to Israel’s sophisti- cated anti-missile Iron Dome system.
    [Show full text]
  • Opinion New Government, New President, New Israel?
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 20, ISSUE 3 Studies Opinion New Government, New President, New Israel? Melanie Carina Schmoll, PhD Israel in summer 2021 – the end of the pandemic seems to be near. Israel opens up, almost all mask requirements are cancelled, international travel groups are welcome and even the individual guests are allowed to travel to the Holy Land with almost no restrictions. It seems Israel is back in pre-pandemic times. But it is not the same country anymore. Some fundamental changes have happened over the last few weeks. When, in March 2021, the Israelis had to vote again for the Israeli Parliament, the Knesset, it was for the fourth time within two and a half years. The outcome was almost the same as the three times before. Benjamin Nethanyahu, Israel´s long-time prime minister, won most of the seats with his Likud party. As the State of Israel is a parlamentary democracy the executive branch or the government draws its authority from the Parliament (the legislative branch) and needs its confidence. Therefore, the prime minister is not decided directly by the voters but depends instead on a process of bargaining among the various fractions elected to parliament. In Israel, no single party holds most of the seats in Parliament and thus the process of forming a government is long and complicated.1 Israel also has an extreme proportional system of government, 1 For more information see Melanie Carina Schmoll, “Israel and the permanent siege: The people have spoken - who will find an answer to the needs of the voters?” Journal of Military and Strategic Studies 20, 1 (2019).
    [Show full text]
  • An Israeli Labor Party Perspective on Peace | the Washington Institute
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 1818 An Israeli Labor Party Perspective on Peace by Isaac Herzog Jun 20, 2011 ABOUT THE AUTHORS Isaac Herzog Isaac Herzog is chairman of the executive at the Jewish Agency for Israel. Brief Analysis n June 16, 2011, Isaac Herzog addressed a Policy Forum at The Washington Institute to discuss Israel's next O steps in the wake of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's recent visit to Washington. A member of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, Mr. Herzog has served in a number of senior positions in the Israeli government, most recently as minister of welfare and social services. He is currently a candidate for the Labor Party chairmanship. The following is a rapporteur's summary of his remarks. Given the huge uncertainties created by the Arab Spring, many Israelis believe that the best response is a "wait and see" approach. That is a narrow, short-term view, however. A better response is to shape the region's changes in Israel's interest, based on the view that it is better to influence history than be swept along as a passive participant. From that perspective, President Obama's recent speech hit on the crux of the difference between the Israeli right and left. The current government chose to focus on a few controversial words in the speech and, in the process, deepened the tension between Israel and the United States. On the other hand, the Israeli opposition -- especially the Labor Party -- welcomed the address as another evolutionary step from the 2000 Clinton Parameters toward the goal of ending the conflict with the Palestinians.
    [Show full text]
  • S Election Results
    The Challenge of Israel’s Election Results I wrote the following for the latest newsletter of the World Union of Meretz, from the J Street Conference in Washington, DC. Representatives of all of the Israeli opposition gathered there, meeting together with its counterparts from American Jewry, who clearly represent the majority of American Jews. The final polls allowed on Friday the 13th, four days before election day, had given the Zionist Union (Labor & Hatnua) led by Herzog and Livni a lead of 24 to 20 seats, with an even chance to lead the next government. Netanyahu then went into emergency mode, using every demagogic trick in the book to turn the results around. He warned the leadership of the settlers that “the left” was on the verge of winning, and would begin to evacuate settlements, so they mobilized en masse, coming in thousands to Likud strongholds in the outlying and development towns to get out the vote. Mobilizing the extreme right to abandon Naftali Bennet’s Jewish Home party, Lieberman’s Yisrael Beiteinu and the ultra-right Yachad party (led by Shas refugee Eli Yishai in alliance with Kahanist Baruch Marzel), Netanyahu renounced his support for a two-state solution, and on election day warned that Israeli Arabs were voting in droves, being “bussed in by Jewish left-wingers” supported by foreign money. This last claim was ridiculous, since Israeli Arab citizens were simply walking to the polling booths, exercising their democratic right to vote, and energized by the fact that the four Arab parties had united in a Joint Arab List to ensure that they would pass the minimum voter threshold that had been raised to try to prevent them from entering the Knesset.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Manekin, Sitting on the Fence: the Problems with Herzog’S Disengagement Plan
    Michael Manekin, Sitting on the Fence: The problems with Herzog’s Disengagement Plan Mikhael Manekin is the executive director of Molad, the Center for the Renewal of Israeli Democracy. Yesterday he posted the best response I have seen to Isaac Herzog’s Disengagement plan. In essence, he argues that plan looks more like a PR stunt than a real policy. Herzog avoids discussing real issues and does not offer solutions to most problems. But Manekin’s most significant contribution is his observation that Herzog simply fails to perceive himself as an alternative to Netanyahu. He cannot imagine a universe in which Netanyahu will not be Israel’s Prime Minister. This is an interesting psychological failure – one I had not expected of the leader of the opposition. Translation by Maya Haber from The Hebrew original: In recent weeks there has been talk about Isaac Herzog’s new plan and his argument that the two-state solution should be suspended until further notice. It is important to understand the real problems with Herzog’s plan. The plan calls for separation from the Palestinians. This is not new. It has been the Labor Party’s plan for the last few decades. Other than that, the program lacks content and looks more like a PR stunt, as if it was written by people who are seeking a magic formula rather than a political solution. 1. The plan is characterized by inconsistencies. It was presented at various forums and in different formats – Herzog’s speech, several interviews he gave to different media outlets, on the Labor Party’s website, in an email sent to party activists and in several Facebook posts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Labor Party and the Peace Camp
    The Labor Party and the Peace Camp By Uzi Baram In contemporary Israeli public discourse, the preoccupation with ideology has died down markedly, to the point that even releasing a political platform as part of elections campaigns has become superfluous. Politicians from across the political spectrum are focused on distinguishing themselves from other contenders by labeling themselves and their rivals as right, left and center, while floating around in the air are slogans such as “political left,” social left,” “soft right,” “new right,” and “mainstream right.” Yet what do “left” and “right” mean in Israel, and to what extent do these slogans as well as the political division in today’s Israel correlate with the political traditions of the various parties? Is the Labor Party the obvious and natural heir of The Workers Party of the Land of Israel (Mapai)? Did the historical Mapai under the stewardship of Ben Gurion view itself as a left-wing party? Did Menachem Begin’s Herut Party see itself as a right-wing party? The Zionist Left and the Soviet Union As far-fetched as it may seem in the eyes of today’s onlooker, during the first years after the establishment of the state, the position vis-à-vis the Soviet Union was the litmus test of the left camp, which was then called “the workers’ camp.” This camp viewed the centrist liberal “General Zionists” party, which was identified with European liberal and middle-class beliefs in private property and capitalism, as its chief ideological rival (and with which the heads of major cities such as Tel Aviv and Ramat Gan were affiliated)­.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Minister Israel Katz: 'The Days of the Ottoman Empire Are Over
    Editorials ..................................... 4A Op-Ed .......................................... 5A Calendar ...................................... 6A Scene Around ............................. 9A Synagogue Directory ................ 11A News Briefs ............................... 10A WWW.HERITAGEFL.COM YEAR 44, NO. 7 OCTOBER 18, 2019 19 TISHREI, 5780 ORLANDO, FLORIDA SINGLE COPY 75¢ Gunmen kill 2 on Yom Kippur By Ron Kampeas Police captured one man but said another was on the loose (JTA)—At least two gun- and warned residents to stay men opened fire on a syna- indoors. CNN quoted a Ger- gogue during Yom Kippur man security official as saying services and a kebab shop in that the ideology driving the Halle, a town in eastern Ger- attack was from the far right. many. The shooters reportedly SITE, a private intelligence were from the far right. group based in the United The masked gunmen re- States, said on Twitter that portedly were repelled by the the shooters had posted video synagogue’s doors, secured on a gaming site and that one shut during the services of them had said, in English, Wednesday on the most sol- that the “root of all problems emn day of the Jewish year. are Jews.” There were 70 to 80 people Security was increased at in the synagogue at the time synagogues around Germany of the attack. One of the gun- in the wake of the attack. men shot a woman dead at a German and other world nearby Jewish cemetery and leaders condemned the at- A convoy of U.S. soldiers in Syria in December 2018. a gunman threw a grenade at tack. Israeli Prime Minister the kebab shop, and then fired Benjamin Netanyahu on at it, killing a man.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 19/16 Aktuelles Aus Israelischen Tageszeitungen 1
    Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 19/16 Aktuelles aus israelischen Tageszeitungen 1.-15. Oktober Die Themen dieser Ausgabe Beerdigung von Shimon Peres ................................................................................................................................. 1 UNESCO-Debakel .................................................................................................................................................... 3 Terror in Jerusalem ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Medienquerschnitt .................................................................................................................................................... 6 Beerdigung von Shimon Peres to Peres’s determined pursuit of peace, it was jarring Die Beisetzung von Israels früherem Staatspräsi- to observe the rejectionist front being represented, denten Shimon Peres, der Ende September den not just by a terrorist organization, but by a party of Folgen eines schweren Schlaganfalls erlag, ent- Israeli parliamentarians. Due to all of this, Abbas’s puppt sich rückblickend mehr und mehr als Politi- participation was an important step that should be kum. Mehrere Redner, darunter US-Präsident Ba- appreciated by Israel and the Netanyahu govern- rack Obama und der israelische Schriftsteller Amos ment. (…) Abbas took an important step on Friday, Oz, nutzen die Bühne zur Mahnung, das Erbe von especially considering the criticism that he faced Peres
    [Show full text]
  • Israel: Background and US Relations
    Israel: Background and U.S. Relations (name redacted) Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs June 1, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RL33476 Israel: Background and U.S. Relations Summary Since Israel’s founding in 1948, successive U.S. Presidents and many Members of Congress have demonstrated a commitment to Israel’s security and to maintaining close U.S.-Israel cooperation. Common perceptions of shared democratic values and religious affinities have contributed to the strong bilateral ties. The question of Israel’s security regularly influences U.S. policy considerations regarding the Middle East, and Congress provides active oversight of executive branch dealings with Israel and other actors in the region. Israel is a leading recipient of U.S. foreign aid and a frequent purchaser of major U.S. weapons systems. By law, U.S. arms sales cannot adversely affect Israel’s “qualitative military edge” over other countries in its region. The two countries signed a free trade agreement in 1985, and the United States is Israel’s largest trading partner. Israel has many regional security concerns and aligning U.S. and Israeli policies to address these concerns has presented persistent challenges. By voicing criticism of international diplomacy on Iran’s nuclear program, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu may seek to give Israel a voice in an ongoing negotiating process in which it does not directly participate. As a June 2015 deadline nears for a comprehensive international agreement on the issue, Israel apparently seeks material assurances that the United States will bolster its regional security standing and self-defense capabilities. In addition to concerns over Iran, Israel’s perceptions of security around its borders have changed since 2011 as several surrounding Arab countries have experienced political upheaval.
    [Show full text]