African Development Fund

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

African Development Fund NIGERIA TRUST FUND Language: English Original: English REPUBLIC OF THE GAMBIA PARTICIPATORY INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROJECT (PIWAMP) APPRAISAL REPORT Agriculture and Rural Development OCAR Department April 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Information Sheet, Currency and Measures, List of Tables, List of Annexes, List of Abbreviations, Basic Data Sheet, Project Logical Framework, Executive Summary 1. ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE PROJECT ....................................................1 2. THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR .......................................................................2 2.1 Salient Features ..........................................................................................................2 2.2 Land Tenure ..............................................................................................................3 2.3 Poverty Status ............................................................................................................4 2.4 Gender Issues .............................................................................................................4 2.5 HIV/AIDS issues and Vector borne diseases ............................................................6 2.6 Environmental Issues .................................................................................................7 2.7 Institutional framework ..............................................................................................7 2.8 Agricultural Sector Constraints and Potentials ........................................................11 2.9 Agricultural Policy and Development Strategy .......................................................12 2.10 Donor Interventions .................................................................................................13 3. NATURAL RESOURCES SUB-SECTOR ..........................................................15 3.1 Land Resources ........................................................................................................15 3.2 Water Resources ......................................................................................................17 3.3 Forest and Wildlife Resources .................................................................................17 4. THE PROJECT .....................................................................................................18 4.1 Project Concept and Rationale .................................................................................18 4.2 Project Area and Beneficiaries .................................................................................20 4.3 Strategic Context ......................................................................................................21 4.4 Project Objective ......................................................................................................22 4.5 Project Description ...................................................................................................22 4.6 Production, Markets and Prices ...............................................................................31 4.7 Environmental Impact ..............................................................................................32 4.8 Project Costs ............................................................................................................33 4.9 Sources of Financing and Expenditure Schedule .....................................................34 5. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION ........................................................................36 5.1 Executing Agency ....................................................................................................36 5.2 Institutional Arrangements .......................................................................................36 5.3 Supervision and Implementation Schedules ............................................................37 5.4 Procurement Arrangements .....................................................................................38 5.5 Disbursement Arrangements ....................................................................................41 5.6 Monitoring and Evaluation ......................................................................................41 5.7 Financial Reporting and Auditing ...........................................................................42 5.8 Aid-coordination ......................................................................................................42 6. PROJECT SUSTAINABILITY AND RISKS .....................................................43 6.1 Recurrent Costs ........................................................................................................43 6.2 Project Sustainability ...............................................................................................43 6.3 Critical Risks and Mitigation Measures ...................................................................44 7. PROJECT BENEFITS ..........................................................................................44 7.1 Financial Analysis ....................................................................................................44 7.2 Economic Analysis ..................................................................................................45 7.3 Social Impact Analysis ............................................................................................45 7.4 Sensitivity Analysis .................................................................................................46 8 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...............................................47 8.1 Conclusions ..............................................................................................................47 8.2 Recommendations ....................................................................................................47 This report was prepared by Messrs. Driss Lekorchi, Civil Engineer (Mission Leader); Harouna Dosso, Agronomist and a Consultant Agricultural Economist, following an Appraisal Mission to The Gambia during November and December 2003. Additional inquiries relating to the report should be addressed to the authors or Mr. Sami Z. Moussa, Division Manager, OCAR.2 (Extension 2143). LIST OF TABLES TABLE Page 4.1 Summary of Project Cost Estimates by Component ................................................34 4.2 Summary of Project Cost Estimates by Category of Expenditure ...........................34 4.3 Summary of Project Cost by Source of Financing ...................................................35 4.4 Summary of Project Cost by Category of Expenditure and Financier .....................35 4.5 Summary Expenditure Schedule by Component .....................................................36 4.6 Summary Expenditure Schedule by Source of Finance ...........................................36 5.1 Summary of Implementation Schedule ....................................................................39 5.2 Summary of Procurement Arrangements .................................................................39 LIST OF ANNEXES ANNEXES Number of Pages 1. Map of Project Area ...................................................................................................1 2. Project Organisation and Management ......................................................................1 3. Provisional List of Goods and Services .....................................................................1 4. Environmental and Social Management Summary ....................................................2 5. Bank Group Operations ............................................................................................2 VOLUME 2 ANNEXES Number of Pages 1. Farm Budgets .............................................................................................................6 2. Detailed Cost Tables ..................................................................................................8 3. Detailed Economic and Financial Analysis ...............................................................2 4. IAFD Main Appraisal Report ..................................................................................66 5. Engineering Design Description ..............................................................................43 6. Working Papers: Institutional and Implementation Arrangements .........................51 NIGERIAN TRUST FUND BP 323 – 1002 Tunis Belvédère, Tunis - TUNISIA TEL: (216) 71.10.20.36 FAX: (216) 71.33.29.92 PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Date: December 2003 1. COUNTRY : Republic of The Gambia 2. TITLE OF PROJECT : Participatory Integrated Watershed Management Project 3. LOCATION : Selected sites in each of six Divisions (North Bank Division, Western Bank Division, Lower River Division, Central River Division North, Central Division South and Upper River Division) 4. BORROWER : Republic of The Gambia 5. EXECUTING AGENCY : Department of State for Agriculture, The Quadrangle, Banjul Tel: (220) 20 11 87 ; Fax: (220) 22 89 98 E-Mail: psdosa@ qanet.gm. 6. PROJECT DESCRIPTION : The sector goal of the proposed project is to reduce rural poverty and enhance food security. The project objective is to increase land productivity and reduce soil erosion. The following are the project’s expected outputs: the communities are trained and empowered in natural resources management; the production and productivity of the project area are increased on a sustainable basis; the access to market infrastructure and inputs is improved.
Recommended publications
  • Community Forestry Conflict Management in Central River Division, the Gambia
    CASE STUDY 2 Who owns Kayai Island? Community forestry conflict management in Central River division, the Gambia By A. Dampha, K. Camara, A. Jarjusey, M. Badjan and K. Jammeh, Forestry Department, the Gambia and National Consultancy for Forestry Extension and Training Services (NACO) Edited by A.P. Castro SUMMARY Kayai and Saruja villages are located on opposite sides of the River Gambia. Between them is Kayai Island, whose 784 ha consists mainly of forest reserve containing economically valuable species and a large wildlife population.The people of Kayai village regard the island as falling within their traditional lands. In the 1950s, the colonial government, without consulting Kayai village, gave farm plots on the island to people in Saruja as compensation for land annexed by an agricultural project. Since then, several disputes have arisen between the two villages over ownership of the island. Attempts to resolve the conflict, including though court adjudication, proved unsuccessful. The latest clash was provoked by the government’s recent participatory forestry initiative, which empowers communities to manage forest lands. This decentralization of public forestry administration seeks to foster sustainable natural resource management, addressing shortcomings in the State forestry that has been in operation since colonial times. A proposal by Kayai village to set up a community forest on the island met with resistance from Saruja villagers, who refused to sign the agreement approving it. The people of Saruja feared losing their rice fields, gardens and orchards and their access to forest products. As in the past, public and forestry officials’ efforts to resolve the conflict were not successful.
    [Show full text]
  • Omvg Energy Project Countries
    AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GROUP PROJECT : OMVG ENERGY PROJECT COUNTRIES : MULTINATIONAL GAMBIA - GUINEA- GUINEA BISSAU - SENEGAL SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) Team Members: Mr. A.B. DIALLO, Chief Energy Engineer, ONEC.1 Mr. P. DJAIGBE, Principal Financial Analyst, ONEC.1/SNFO Mr. K. HASSAMAL, Economist, ONEC.1 Mrs. S.MAHIEU, Socio-Economist, ONEC.1 Mrs. S.MAIGA, Procurement Officer, ORPF.1/SNFO Mr. O. OUATTARA, Financial Management Expert, ORPF.2/SNFO Mr. A.AYASI SALAWOU, Legal Consultant, GECL.1 Project Team Mr. M.L. KINANE, Principal Environmentalist ONEC.3 Mr. S. BAIOD, Environmentalist, ONEC.3 Mr. H.P. SANON, Socio-Economist, ONEC.3 Sector Director: Mr. A.RUGUMBA, Director, ONEC Regional Director: Mr. J.K. LITSE, Acting Director, ORWA Division Manager: Mr. A.ZAKOU, Division Manager, ONEC.1, 1 OMVG ENERGY PROJECT Summary of ESIA Project Name : OMVG ENERGY PROJECT Country : MULTINATIONAL GAMBIA - GUINEA- GUINEA BISSAU - SENEGAL Project Ref. Number : PZ1-FAO-018 Department : ONEC Division: ONEC 1 1. INTRODUCTION This paper is the summary of the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) of the OMVG Project, which was prepared in July 2014. This summary was drafted in accordance with the environmental requirements of the four OMVG countries and the African Development Bank’s Integrated Safeguards System for Category 1 projects. It starts with a presentation of the project description and rationale, followed by the legal and institutional frameworks of the four countries. Next, a description of the main environmental conditions of the project is presented along with project options which are compared in terms of technical, economic and social feasibility.
    [Show full text]
  • GAMBIA POPULATION MOVEMENTS (Appeal 19/98)
    18 December 1998 GAMBIA: POPULATION MOVEMENTS appeal no. 19/98 situation report no. 03 period covered: 14 October - 30 November 1998 The coastal area of West Africa extending from Senegal's southern Casamance region to Sierra Leone remains volatile, prompting the flight of refugees to the Gambia. With the deteriorating conditions of refugees housed in camps, the Gambia Red Cross Society (GRCS) has been requested by the Government of Gambia to provide assistance, pending the promotion of voluntary repatriation when conditions allow, or identifying longer-term durable solutions. Appeal no. 19/98 covers refugee movements from Guinea Bissau to the Gambia and other host countries. Given that the vast majority of Guinea Bissauan refugees fled from the armed conflict in their country to neighbouring Guinea Conakry, the focus has previously been maintained on assistance to refugees in that country. This situation report, however, concerns a small caseload of refugees who fled from Guinea Bissau to the Gambia, and who are settled in camps together with refugees from Senegal and Sierra Leone. The context As a result of political turmoil and civil unrest in this region over recent years, there has been a constant influx of refugees to the Gambia. Since 1992, hundreds of refugees from the Casamance region of Senegal have found their way to the country, the latest wave arriving in June 1998. This year, some 1,040 refugees fleeing civil war in Sierra Leone between rebel forces, ECOMOG and government troops have also sought refuge in the Gambia. Most recently, the conflict between government forces and rebels in Guinea Bissau has led to the movement of some 150 refugees to the Gambia since July 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Farafenni Dss, the Gambia
    Farafenni Demographic Surveillance System (Member of the INDEPTH Network) Profile of the FARAFENNI DSS, THE GAMBIA March, 2004 1. Physical geography and Population Characteristics of the Farafenni DSA The Gambia is the smallest continental country in Africa, with a land area of just 10 360 km2 (480 km from east to west and on average 48 km from north to south) and a total population of 1.4 million in July 2000 (Figure 1). It is surrounded by Senegal, with which it once shared a short-lived federation (‘Senegambia”), from 1982 to 1989. The town of Farafenni is on the north bank of the Gambia River, about 170 km inland from the capital, Banjul. The main road between Dakar and the Casamance crosses the Gambia River at Farafenni, which has a ferry suitable for heavy vehicles. The average annual rainfall, measured at the Farafenni field station in 1989-99, was 683 mm, but the relative variability is large (22.6%), with amounts in the 11-year period ranging from 515 mm in 1991 to 1000 mm in 1999. The Gambia has a single rainy season, extending from June to October, with peak rains in August. The vegetation is dry savannah, with scattered trees, but in the rainy season, grasses and bushes grow strongly. Rice is cultivated in the river bottoms and in the upland areas where millet, sorghum, and other cereals are the staple food crops. Figure 1: Location of the Farafenni DSS site, The Gambia. 2. Population characteristics of the Farafenni DSA The surveillance site is located in a rural area between latitudes 130 and 140N and longitudes 150 and 160W and comprises 40 small villages, extending 32 km to the east and 22 km to the west of the town of Farafenni (1993 population, 21,000).
    [Show full text]
  • Country Profile – Gambia
    Country profile – Gambia Version 2005 Recommended citation: FAO. 2005. AQUASTAT Country Profile – Gambia. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licencerequest or addressed to [email protected]. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/ publications) and can be purchased through [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Assistance to the Gambia Oar/Banjul June
    U.S. ASSISTANCE TO THE GAMBIA OAR/BANJUL JUNE, IM2 U.S. ASSISTANCE TO THE GAMBIA United States assistance to The Gambia prior to its independence was fairly limited. in the period 1946 through 1961, some $300,000 was provided to the country through the Erit,14sh Foreign Office. From 1962 through 1975 bilateral assistance was extended through food aid (totalling $5.3 million), technical assistance (totalling $l.14million), and the Peace Corps ($2.0 million), for a grand total of $8.4 million. 5However, indirect economic assistance was provided contribution to various African regional and worldwide programs such as the West African Measles-Smallpox Campaigns. funded through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) in the mid-1960s. The Gambia began to receive more direct U.S. Government assistance starting in 1973-74 as the great Sahelian drought wreaked havoc across West Africa. Even though it is a riverine country, 'The Gambia is entirelu within the Sahelian climatic zone. During the drought, its cash crop and food crop production trailed off and environmental degradation set in. The U.S. Government attempted to help alleviate the situation by providing a significant increase in food aid. Food assistance has continued since then and is presently running at some $600 ,000 and $800,000 a year (excluding freight charges) which is in addition to periodic emergency food shipments in response to famine conditions, e.g., 1978 and again in 1980 and 1981. In 1974, AID received permr'ission from the Government of The Gamnbia (GOTO) to assign an Economic Development Oficer in The Gambia and establish an office in Banjul, which reported to the Regional Develop­ ment Office in Dakar.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Paper Gambian Women's Struggles Through Collective Action
    Studies in Social Science Research ISSN 2690-0793 (Print) ISSN 2690-0785 (Online) Vol. 2, No. 3, 2021 www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/sssr Original Paper Gambian Women’s Struggles through Collective Action Fatou Janneh1 1 Political Science Unit, the University of The Gambia, Brikama, The Gambia Received: August 1, 2021 Accepted: August 9, 2021 Online Published: August 13, 2021 doi:10.22158/sssr.v2n3p41 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.22158/sssr.v2n3p41 Abstract Women have a long history of organizing collective action in The Gambia. Between the 1970s to the 1990s, they were instrumental to The Gambia’s politics. Yet they have held no political power within its government. This paper argues that, since authorities failed to serve women’s interests, Gambian women resorted to using collective action to overcome their challenges through kafoolu and kompins [women’s grassroots organizations] operating in the rural and urban areas. They shifted their efforts towards organizations that focused on social and political change. These women’s organizations grew significantly as they helped women to promote social and economic empowerment. The women cultivated political patronage with male political leaders to achieve their goals. Political leaders who needed popular support to buttress their political power under the new republican government cash in patronage. Thus, this study relies on primary data from oral interviews. Secondary sources such as academic journals, books, and policy reports provide context to the study. Keywords Collective action, struggle,
    [Show full text]
  • The Gambia: Squall in Upper River Division; Information Bulletin No
    THE GAMBIA: SQUALL IN 12 September 2003 UPPER RIVER DIVISION Information Bulletin N° 2/03 Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) Allocated: CHF 30,000 The Federation’s mission is to improve the lives of vulnerable people by mobilizing the power of humanity. It is the world’s largest humanitarian organization and its millions of volunteers are active in over 180 countries. For more information: www.ifrc.org In Brief This document is being issued based on the needs described below. An initial budget was prepared for activities to address these needs, and totals CHF 88,932. Based on this budget, a DREF allocation of CHF 30,000 has been released. The Federation would appreciate donors to support the local requirements of the Gambia Red Cross Society. Un-earmarked funds to repay DREF are also needed. This operation will be reported on through the DREF update. The situation On August 24 at 10 p.m., a squall of some 30-35 knots hit the area around Basse Santa Su in Upper River Division (URD), the Gambia. According to the Basse Hydrometereological Institute, the squall came in from the east and severely damaged more than 100 compounds within 10 minutes, affecting more than 1,000 persons in Mansajang Kunda, Manneh Kunda, Alluhareh, Basse and Koba Kunda Operational developments An assessment team composed of Government, Gambia Red Cross and NGO representatives visited some of the affected areas in Upper River Division (URD) on August 30-31. The team – coordinated by CRS - also collected secondary information from the Commissioner’s Office and compiled a Needs Assessment Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Threats to the Monkeys of the Gambia
    Threats to the monkeys of The Gambia E.D. Starin There are five, perhaps only four, monkey species in The Gambia and all are under threat. The main problems are habitat destruction, hunting of crop raiders and illegal capture for medical re- search. The information presented here was collected during a long-term study from March 1978 to September 1983 on the socio-ecology of the red colobus monkey in the Abuko Nature Reserve. Further information was collected during brief periods between February 1985 and April 1989 on the presence of monkeys in the forest parks. It is not systematic nor extensive, but it indicates clearly that action is needed if monkeys are to remain as part of the country's wildlife. The most pressing need is for survey work to supply the information needed to work out a conservation plan. The Gambia — an overview estimated at 3.3 per cent, which means that the The Gambia forms a narrow band on either side population doubles every 20 years. Only about of the river Gambia for some 475 km. The coun- 20 per cent of the population is urban, the rest try varies in width from about 24 to 48 km and is living scattered through the country in small vil- bordered on three sides by the Republic of lages. As a result there is virtually no undisturbed Senegal. forest and very few protected areas. The remain- ing forest cover (3.4 per cent of the country) is The Gambian climate consists of a long dry rapidly being converted into tree and shrub season with a shorter, but intense, rainy season.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Bridges for Creative Learning from the Bay to the Bantaba Bill Roberts
    Building Bridges for Creative Learning From the Bay to the Bantaba Bill Roberts Since 1996, St. Mary’s College of Maryland has sponsored three field study programs to The Gambia, West Africa. Ten students joined me for the first program in the summer of 1996. They stayed in Gambia for a period of either four or six weeks. Each student selected a research topic and, with help from me and the Gambians or expatriates I knew, collected original data for a report on their topic. We published the reports together in a volume titled Tubabs Under the Baobab: Study and Adventure in West Africa. We sent our friends and colleagues in The Gambia copies of the volume, and gave another 20 copies to the Methodist Bookstore where they were sold for 100 dalasis apiece. They sold quickly, but not long thereafter, the bookstore closed. The 1998 group on the bantaba at Tanje village museum. summer of 2000, and spent over six weeks in West Africa. Joining me were faculty advisers Professor Lawrence Rich (foreign languages) and his wife Celia, a professional photographer and social activist. For me, the third occasion of the field program was highly symbolic and meaningful. Our return demonstrated continuity in our growing commitment to create a collaborative program of learning, research and service. St. Mary’s field program in Gambia has evolved towards a ‘mutualism’ model of collaboration that generates benefits for all participants, U.S. Americans and Gambians alike. The first group of St. Mary’s students to live and study in Perhaps the most significant aspect of the 2000 field The Gambia for a six-week period in 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • West Africa Discover Gorée Island and the Charm, Culture & Wildlife of the Gambia River on Board Harmony V • January 20–February 1, 2015
    The Rivers of West Africa Discover Gorée Island and the Charm, Culture & Wildlife of the Gambia River on board Harmony V • January 20–February 1, 2015 We invite you to join Lyn Mair, our naturalist enormous number of birds, from white-faced from South Africa, as she returns to West Africa whistling duck to storks, egrets, ibis, and pelicans, to lead our group on board the 25-cabin motor- as well as manatees, crocodiles, and monkeys. yacht Harmony V. This trip gives us a way to We will continue upriver to Kuntaur and explore a part of the world most of us have Janjanbureh (historic Georgetown), a sleepy not seen, in all of the comfort of Harmony V. former colonial administrative center. We will The trip will begin with a pretrip to Dakar to visit villages, and motor by pirogue on the river. visit Gorée Island, an historic point where slaves See African dance groups and learn about their were shipped to the American Continent, now instruments and music. a memorial with excellent museums. This will be a We will also visit Lac Rose, just north of Dakar, terrific adventure which is famous for its pink color (due to algae) to a special part of and as the end point of the famous Paris to Dakar the world! Road Race. We will explore on camels or dune We hope you buggies, and have lunch under an open African will join us and tent with traditional music. take advantage of On board M/Y Harmony V, we will explore the this opportunity! Sine-Saloun Delta, a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve, and an important area for breeding waterbirds, including 30,000 pairs of royal terns.
    [Show full text]
  • And Resource Use in the Peri-Urban Area of Banjul, the Gambia
    LAND RIGHTS AND INTRA-HOUSEHOLD EMPLOYMENT AND RESOURCE USE IN THE PERI-URBAN AREA OF BANJUL,THE GAMBIA by Michael Roth, Ben Carr, and Jeff Cochrane LAND RIGHTS AND INTRA-HOUSEHOLD EMPLOYMENT AND RESOURCE USE IN THE PERI-URBAN AREA OF BANJUL, THE GAMBIA by Michael Roth, Ben Carr, and Jeff Cochrane* *Michael Roth is associate research scientist with the Land Tenure Center and Department of Agricultural Economics, and Jeff Cochrane is research associate with the Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Ben Carr is a consultant and project associate. All views, interpretations, recommendations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the supporting or cooperating organizations. LTC Research Paper 126 Land Tenure Center University of Wisconsin January 1996 ii Copyright © 1995 by Michael Roth, Ben Carr, and Jeff Cochrane. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter 1: Introduction and Research Methodology 1 I. Introduction 1 II. Peri-Urban Project 2 III. Overview of Report 3 Chapter 2: Research Methodology 5 I. Research Design 5 A. Scheduling 5 B. Research Area 5 C. Village Selection 7 D. Research Setting 7 E. Political Structures 9 F. Research Questions 9 II. Survey Instruments 11 Chapter 3: Household Socioeconomic Profile 13 I. Introduction 13 II. Household Demographic Profile 13 III. Household Assets and Wealth 18 IV. Migration and Settlement 20 V. Land Assets and Farm Structure 21 VI.
    [Show full text]