DOCSLIB.ORG

Temperature Effects on the Development in the Solitary Bee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Temperature Effects on the Development in the Solitary Bee Temperature effects on the development in the solitary bee Osmia bicornis (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae) titelblatt Development time, brain microstructure, and cognitive abilities Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) der Fakultät für Biologie und vorklinische Medizin der Universität Regensburg vorgelegt von Sabine Radmacher aus Mechernich im Jahr 2011 Temperature effects on the development in the solitary bee Osmia bicornis (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae) Development time, brain microstructure, and cognitive abilities Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) der Fakultät für Biologie und vorklinische Medizin der Universität Regensburg vorgelegt von Sabine Radmacher aus Mechernich im Jahr 2011 Das Promotionsgesuch wurde eingereicht am: 07.07.2011 Die Arbeit wurde angeleitet von: Prof. Dr. Erhard Strohm Unterschrift: „Oh glücklich! wer noch hoffen kann aus diesem Meer des Irrtums aufzutauchen. Was man nicht weiß das eben brauchte man, und was man weiß kann man nicht brauchen.“ Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, „Faust - Der Tragödie erster Teil“ TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF PUBLICATIONS ............................................................................................ 5 CHAPTER 1: GENERAL INTRODUCTION ............................................................. 6 1.1 Temperature – an important environmental factor for insects ........................... 6 1.2 Temperature and bee development .................................................................... 8 1.3 The study species: Osmia bicornis .................................................................. 11 1.4 Outline of this thesis ........................................................................................ 12 CHAPTER 2: EFFECTS OF CONSTANT AND FLUCTUATING TEMPERATURES ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SOLITARY BEE OSMIA BICORNIS (HYMENOPTERA, MEGACHILIDAE) ................................. 15 2.1 Summary.......................................................................................................... 15 2.2 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 16 2.3 Materials and Methods .................................................................................... 17 2.3.1 Bees ..................................................................................................... 17 2.3.2 Provision weight ................................................................................. 18 2.3.3 Temperature treatments ...................................................................... 18 2.3.4 Observation cocoons ........................................................................... 19 2.3.5 Wintering ............................................................................................. 19 2.3.6 Data analyses ....................................................................................... 20 2.4 Results ............................................................................................................. 20 2.4.1 Prepupal weight................................................................................... 20 2.4.2 Mortality.............................................................................................. 22 2.4.3 Duration of development ................................................................... 22 2.5 Discussion........................................................................................................ 24 2.5.1 Prepupal weight................................................................................... 24 2.5.2 Mortality.............................................................................................. 25 2.5.3 Duration of development .................................................................... 26 2.6 Acknowledgements .......................................................................................... 27 CHAPTER 3: TEMPERATURE EFFECTS ON SOLITARY BEE DEVELOPMENT – DOES TEMPERATURE EXPERIENCED AS LARVA INFLUENCE THE DURATION OF THE PREPUPAL STAGE? ........................... 28 3.1 Summary.......................................................................................................... 28 3.2 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 29 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.3 Materials and Methods .................................................................................... 30 3.3.1 Bees ..................................................................................................... 30 3.3.2 Temperature treatments ....................................................................... 31 3.3.3 Observation cocoons ........................................................................... 31 3.3.4 Data analyses ....................................................................................... 32 3.4 Results ............................................................................................................. 32 3.4.1 Development from egg to cocoon ....................................................... 32 3.4.2 Development inside the cocoon .......................................................... 33 3.4.3 Complete development ....................................................................... 34 3.5 Discussion........................................................................................................ 36 3.5.1 Development from egg to cocoon ....................................................... 36 3.5.2 Development inside the cocoon and complete development .............. 36 3.6 Acknowledgements .......................................................................................... 39 CHAPTER 4: EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE DURING DEVELOPMENT ON THE SYNAPTIC ORGANIZATION IN THE BRAIN OF THE SOLITARY BEE OSMIA BICORNIS (HYMENOPTERA, MEGACHILIDAE) ................................. 40 4.1 Summary.......................................................................................................... 40 4.2 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 41 4.3 Materials and Methods .................................................................................... 43 4.3.1 Bees and temperature treatments ........................................................ 43 4.3.2 Brain preparation and immunocytochemistry ..................................... 43 4.3.3 Imaging, estimating neuropil sizes, and counting MG ....................... 44 4.3.4 Data analyses ....................................................................................... 45 4.4 Results ............................................................................................................. 46 4.4.1 Immunofluorescence labelling of neuropils ........................................ 46 4.4.2 Body size and calyx branch size ......................................................... 47 4.4.3 MG density and MG number .............................................................. 47 4.4.4 Comparison of relative temperature effects on honeybees and O. bicornis .................................................................................................... 49 4.5 Discussion........................................................................................................ 50 4.5.1 Labelling of neuropils ......................................................................... 50 4.5.2 Body size and neuropil size ................................................................ 51 4.5.3 MG density and MG number .............................................................. 51 4.5.4 Comparison of temperature effects on honeybees and O. bicornis .... 52 4.6 Acknowledgements .......................................................................................... 53 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 5: DOES TEMPERATURE EXPERIENCED DURING METAMORPHOSIS AFFECT THE SYNAPTIC ORGANIZATION IN THE BRAIN OF A SOLITARY BEE? ................................................................................. 54 5.1 Summary.......................................................................................................... 54 5.2 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 55 5.3 Materials and Methods .................................................................................... 56 5.3.1 Bees and temperature treatments ........................................................ 56 5.3.2 Brain preparations and immunocytochemistry ................................... 58 5.3.3 Imaging, estimating neuropil sizes, and counting MG ....................... 58 5.3.4 Data analyses ....................................................................................... 60 5.4 Results ............................................................................................................. 61 5.4.1 Immunofluorescence labelling of neuropils ........................................ 61 5.4.2 Effects of T1 ........................................................................................ 61 5.4.3 Effects of T2 ........................................................................................ 62 5.4.4 Comparison of relative temperature effects ........................................ 65 5.5 Discussion.......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Positive Correlation Between Pesticide Consumption and Longevity in Solitary Bees: Are We Overlooking Fitness Trade-Offs?
    insects Article Positive Correlation between Pesticide Consumption and Longevity in Solitary Bees: Are We Overlooking Fitness Trade-Offs? Verena Strobl 1,*, Domenic Camenzind 1, Angela Minnameyer 1, Stephanie Walker 1, Michael Eyer 2 , Peter Neumann 1 and Lars Straub 1,* 1 Institute of Bee Health, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; [email protected] (D.C.); [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (S.W.); [email protected] (P.N.) 2 Laboratory of Soil Biodiversity, University of Neuchâtel, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (V.S.); [email protected] (L.S.) Received: 22 September 2020; Accepted: 18 November 2020; Published: 20 November 2020 Simple Summary: The possible impacts of neonicotinoids combined with glyphosate-based herbicides on bees are unknown. Here, we show no effects of chronic exposure to field-realistic dosages of Roundup® and clothianidin alone or combined on food consumption and cumulative survival of adult female bees, Osmia bicornis in the laboratory. However, a positive correlation between exposure and longevity was revealed. Our data suggest a possibly neglected trade-off between survival and reproduction in insect toxicology. Abstract: The ubiquitous use of pesticides is one major driver for the current loss of biodiversity, and the common practice of simultaneously applying multiple agrochemicals may further contribute. Insect toxicology currently has a strong focus on survival to determine the potential hazards of a chemical routinely used in risk evaluations. However, studies revealing no effect on survival or even indicating enhanced survival are likely to be misleading, if potential trade-offs between survival and other physiological factors are overlooked.
    [Show full text]
  • Foe-UK-Bee-Identification-Guide.Pdf
    Want to know more about rare bumblebees? Found a bumble bee that’s not on here? Take a picture and get it identified at bumblebeeconservation.org. Bee It will be added to on-going research into UK bee populations. identification guide When your wildflowers bloom you should have lots of us coming to visit. We’re not all the same and it’s good to know your guests’ names. So we’ve put together this bee spotter guide to help you identify us. Mason Bee Early Bumblebee Osmia rufa Bombus pratorum Buff-tailed Bumblebee Common Carder Bumblebee Hairy-footed Flower Bee (female) Tawny Mining Bee (female) Forest Cuckoo Bumblebee Bombus terrestris Bombus pascuorum Anthophora plumipes Andrena fulva Bombus sylvestris Honey Bee (worker) Red Mason Bee Hairy-footed Flower Bee (male) Tawny Mining Bee (male) Great Yellow Bumblebee Apis mellifera Osmia bicornis Anthophora plumipes Andrena fulva Bombus distinguendus Early Mining Bee Garden Bumblebee Honey Bee (queen) Willughby’s Leafcutter Bee Red-shanked Carder-bee Bumblebee Andrena haemorrhoa Bombus hortorum Apis mellifera Megachile willughbiella Bombus ruderarius Illustrations by Chris Shields by Illustrations Blue Mason Bee Communal Mining Bee Ivy Mining Bee Red-tailed Bumblebee Short-haired Bumblebee Osmia caerulescens Andrena carantonica Colletes hederae Bombus lapidarius Bombus Subterraneus Davies Mining Bee Fabricus’ Nomad Bee White-tailed Bumblebee Brown-banded Carder Bumblebee Shrill Carder Bumblebee Colletes daviesanus Nomada fabriciana Bombus lucornum Bombus humilis Bombus sylvarum www.foe.co.uk charity. a registered Trust, of the Earth Friends These bee illustrations are not to scale www.foe.co.uk/bees.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting Offspring Body Size in the Solitary Bee Osmia Bicornis (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae) Sabine Radmacher, Erhard Strohm
    Factors affecting offspring body size in the solitary bee Osmia bicornis (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae) Sabine Radmacher, Erhard Strohm To cite this version: Sabine Radmacher, Erhard Strohm. Factors affecting offspring body size in the solitary bee Osmia bicornis (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae). Apidologie, Springer Verlag, 2010, 41 (2), 10.1051/apido/2009064. hal-00892048 HAL Id: hal-00892048 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00892048 Submitted on 1 Jan 2010 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Apidologie 41 (2010) 169–177 Available online at: c INRA/DIB-AGIB/EDP Sciences, 2009 www.apidologie.org DOI: 10.1051/apido/2009064 Original article Factors affecting offspring body size in the solitary bee Osmia bicornis (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae)* Sabine Radmacher,ErhardStrohm Institute of Zoology, University of Regensburg, 93040 Regensburg, Germany Received 12 February 2009 – Revised 11 August 2009 – Accepted 15 August 2009 Abstract – Body size is related to fitness in many insects. In solitary bees offspring body size is largely determined by maternal provisions and microclimate. We studied the effect of quantity and quality of pro- visions and rearing temperatures (20, 25 and 30 ◦C) on body size in the Red Mason bee, Osmia bicornis.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Bees
    Scottish Bees Introduction to bees Bees are fascinating insects that can be found in a broad range of habitats from urban gardens to grasslands and wetlands. There are over 270 species of bee in the UK in 6 families - 115 of these have been recorded in Scotland, with 4 species now thought to be extinct and insufficient data available for another 2 species. Bees are very diverse, varying in size, tongue-length and flower preference. In the UK we have 1 species of honey bee, 24 species of bumblebee and the rest are solitary bees. They fulfil an essential ecological and environmental role as one of the most significant groups of pollinating insects, all of which we depend upon for the pollination of 80% of our wild and cultivated plants. Some flowers are in fact designed specifically for bee pollination, to the exclusion of generalist pollinators. Bees and their relatives Bees are classified in the complex insect order Hymenoptera (meaning membrane-winged), which also includes many kinds of parasitic wasps, gall wasps, hunting wasps, ants and sawflies. There are about 150,000 species of Hymenoptera known worldwide separated into two sub-orders. The first is the most primitive sub-order Symphyta which includes the sawflies and their relatives, lacking a wasp-waist and generally with free-living caterpillar-like larvae. The second is the sub-order Apocrita, which includes the ants, bees and wasps which are ’wasp-waisted’ and have grub-like larvae that develop within hosts, galls or nests. The sub-order Apocrita is in turn divided into two sections, the Parasitica and Aculeata.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Gardens Mitigate Risk of Exposure of Pollinators to Pesticides—An Urban-Rural Case Study Using a Red Mason Bee Species for Biomonitoring
    sustainability Article Domestic Gardens Mitigate Risk of Exposure of Pollinators to Pesticides—An Urban-Rural Case Study Using a Red Mason Bee Species for Biomonitoring Martin Šlachta 1,* , Tomáš Erban 2 , Alena Votavová 3, Tomáš Bešta 4, Michal Skalský 5, Marta Václavíková 6, Tat’ána Halešová 6, Magda Edwards-Jonášová 1, Renata Vˇceláková 1 and Pavel Cudlín 1 1 Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Lipová 1789/9, 370 05 Ceskˇ é Budˇejovice,Czech Republic; [email protected] (M.E.-J.); [email protected] (R.V.); [email protected] (P.C.) 2 Crop Research Institute, Drnovská 507/73, 161 06 Praha 6-Ruzynˇe,Czech Republic; [email protected] 3 Agricultural Research, Ltd., Zahradní 1, 664 41 Troubsko, Czech Republic; [email protected] 4 Institute of Hydrobiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Na Sádkách 702/7, 370 05 Ceskˇ é Budˇejovice,Czech Republic; [email protected] 5 Research and Breeding Institute of Pomology Holovousy Ltd., Holovousy 129, 508 01 Hoˇrice,Czech Republic; [email protected] 6 ALS Limited, ALS Czech Republic, Na Harfˇe336/9, 190 00 Praha 9-Vysoˇcany, Czech Republic; [email protected] (M.V.); [email protected] (T.H.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 26 September 2020; Accepted: 10 November 2020; Published: 12 November 2020 Abstract: Domestic gardens supply pollinators with valuable habitats, but the risk of exposure to pesticides has been little investigated. Artificial nesting shelters of a red mason bee species (Osmia bicornis) were placed in two suburban gardens and two commercial fruit orchards to determine the contamination of forage sources by pesticides.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproduction of the Red Mason Solitary Bee Osmia Rufa (Syn
    Eur. J. Entomol. 112(1): 100–105, 2015 doi: 10.14411/eje.2015.005 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Reproduction of the red mason solitary bee Osmia rufa (syn. Osmia bicornis) (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in various habitats MONIKA FLISZKIEWICZ, ANNA KuśnierczaK and Bożena Szymaś Department of apidology, institute of zoology, Poznań university of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 71c, 60-625 Poznań, Poland; e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Key words. Hymenoptera, Megachilidae, Osmia rufa (Osmia bicornis), ecosystem, reproduction, pollination, parasitism Abstract. Osmia rufa L. (Osmia bicornis L.) is a species of a solitary bee, which pollinates many wild and cultivated plants. A total of 900 cocoons containing mature individuals of Osmia rufa L. (450 females and 450 males of a known weight), were placed in each of four habitats (orchard, mixed forest, hay meadow and arboretum of the Dendrology Institute of the Polish Academy of Sciences at Kórnik). These bees were provided with artificial nests made of the stems of common reed. The following parameters were calculated: reproduction dynamics, total number of chambers built by females, mean number of breeding chambers per reed tube and mean num- ber of cocoons per tube. included in the analysis were also the nectar flowers and weather conditions recorded in each of the habitats studied. General linear mixed models indicated that the highest number of chambers was recorded in the hay meadow (6.6 per tube). However, the number of cocoons per tube was similar in the hay meadow, forest and orchard (4.5–4.8 per tube) but was significantly lower in the arboretum (3.0 cocoons per tube on average).
    [Show full text]
  • (Osmia Bicornis, Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in an Urban
    Landscape and Urban Planning 103 (2011) 15–23 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Landscape and Urban Planning jou rnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/landurbplan Microsite conditions dominate habitat selection of the red mason bee (Osmia bicornis, Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in an urban environment: A case study from Leipzig, Germany a,b, a,c a,d a Jeroen Everaars ∗, Michael W. Strohbach , Bernd Gruber , Carsten F. Dormann a Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany b Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Department of Ecological Modelling, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany c University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Environmental Conservation, Holdsworth Hall, Amherst, MA 01003, USA d Institute for Applied Ecology, Faculty of Applied Science, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: The red mason bee (Osmia bicornis L.) is a common wild bee in urban environments which contributes Received 12 January 2011 to early-season pollination. We know only little about how any species of wild bee in cities responds Received in revised form 20 May 2011 to resource distribution or landscape structure and the urban habitat(s) that they prefer. We employed Accepted 25 May 2011 a citizen science approach to investigate drivers behind the spatial distribution of this solitary bee in the urban region of Leipzig (Germany). Volunteers hung trap nests at different locations and collected information on eight local, microsite conditions (such as sun exposure, attachment position, local flower Keywords: availability).
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Influencing the Diversification of Mating Behavior of Animals
    International Journal of Zoology and Animal Biology ISSN: 2639-216X Factors Influencing the Diversification of Mating Behavior of Animals Afzal S1,2*, Shah SS1,2, Afzal T1, Javed RZ1, Batool F1, Salamat S1 and Review Article Raza A1 Volume 2 Issue 2 1Department of zoology, university of Narowal, Pakistan Received Date: January 28, 2019 Published Date: April 24, 2019 2Department of zoology, university of Punjab, Pakistan DOI: 10.23880/izab-16000145 *Corresponding author: Sabila Afzal, Department of zoology, University of Punjab, Pakistan, Email: [email protected] Abstract “Mating system” of a population refers to the general behavioral strategy employed in obtaining mates. In most of them one sex is more philopatric than the other. Reproductive enhancement through increased access to mates or resources and the avoidance of inbreeding are important in promoting sex differences in dispersal. In birds it is usually females which disperse more than males; in mammals it is usually males which disperse more than females. It is argued that the direction of the sex bias is a consequence of the type of mating system. Philopatry will favor the evolution of cooperative traits between members of the sedentary sex. It includes monogamy, Polygyny, polyandry and promiscuity. As an evolutionary strategy, mating systems have some “flexibility”. The existence of extra-pair copulation shows that mating systems identified on the basis of behavioral observations may not accord with actual breeding systems as determined by genetic analysis. Mating systems influence the effectiveness of the contraceptive control of pest animals. This method of control is most effective in monogamous and polygamous species.
    [Show full text]
  • Specialized Bees Fail to Develop on Non- Host Pollen: Do Plants Chemically Protect Their Pollen?
    1 SPECIALIZED BEES FAIL TO DEVELOP ON NON- HOST POLLEN: DO PLANTS CHEMICALLY PROTECT THEIR POLLEN? 1 CHRISTOPHE J. PRAZ,ANDREAS MU¨LLER, AND SILVIA DORN ETH Zurich, Institute of Plant Sciences, Applied Entomology, Schmelzbergstrasse 9/LFO, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland Abstract Bees require large amounts of pollen for their own reproduction. While several morphological flower traits are known to have evolved to protect plants against excessive pollen harvesting by bees, little is known on how selection to minimize pollen loss acts on the chemical composition of pollen. In this study, we traced the larval development of four solitary bee species, each specialized on a different pollen source, when reared on non-host pollen by transferring unhatched eggs of one species onto the pollen provisions of another species. Pollen diets of Asteraceae and Ranunculus (Ranunculaceae) proved to be inadequate for all bee species tested except those specialized on these plants. Further, pollen of Sinapis (Brassicaceae) and Echium (Boraginaceae) failed to support larval development in one bee species specialized on Campanula (Campanulaceae). Our results strongly suggest that pollen of these four taxonomic groups possess protective properties that hamper digestion and thus challenge the general view of pollen as an easy-to-use protein source for flower visitors. Keywords Apoidea; Asteraceae; bee–flower relationships; Echium; Megachilidae; oligolectic bees; pollenkit; pollination; Ranunculus; secondary compounds; Sinapis; toxic pollen. INTRODUCTION (i.e., those with stamens coming to maturity before the The great majority of flowering plants rely on insects pistil) for example, female bees restrict their foraging to or other animals for pollination. This interaction has flowers in the male phase, thereby scarcely contributing shaped the evolution of both the angiosperms and their to pollination (Mu¨ller 1996a).
    [Show full text]
  • When Beggars Are Choosers—How Nesting of a Solitary Bee Is Affected by Temporal Dynamics of Pollen Plants in the Landscape
    Received: 22 September 2017 | Revised: 1 March 2018 | Accepted: 29 March 2018 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4116 ORIGINAL RESEARCH When beggars are choosers—How nesting of a solitary bee is affected by temporal dynamics of pollen plants in the landscape Anna S. Persson1 | Florence Mazier2 | Henrik G. Smith1,3 1Centre of Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, Lund, Sweden Abstract 2Department of Environmental Wild bees are declining in intensively farmed regions worldwide, threatening pollina- Geography, Jean Jaurès University, tion services to flowering crops and wild plants. To halt bee declines, it is essential Toulouse, France that conservation actions are based on a mechanistic understanding of how bee spe- 3Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden cies utilize landscapes. We aimed at teasing apart how foraging resources in the land- scape through the nesting season affected nesting and reproduction of a solitary bee Correspondence Anna S. Persson, Centre of Environmental in a farmland region. We investigated how availability of floral resources and poten- and Climate Research, Lund University, tially resource- rich habitats surrounding nests affected nest provisioning and repro- Lund, Sweden. Email: [email protected] duction in the solitary polylectic bee Osmia bicornis. The study was performed in 18 landscape sectors dominated by agriculture, but varying in agricultural intensity in Funding information Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Grant/ terms of proportion of organic crop fields and seminatural permanent pastures. Award Number: 2005-788; Kungliga Pasture- rich sectors contained more oak (Quercus robur), which pollen analysis Fysiografiska Sällskapet i Lund showed to be favored forage in early season. More oaks ≤100 m from nests led to higher proportions of oak pollen in nest provisions and increased speed of nest con- struction in early season, but this effect tapered off as flowering decreased.
    [Show full text]
  • (Megachilidae; Osmia) As Fruit Tree Pollinators Claudio Sedivy, Silvia Dorn
    Towards a sustainable management of bees of the subgenus Osmia (Megachilidae; Osmia) as fruit tree pollinators Claudio Sedivy, Silvia Dorn To cite this version: Claudio Sedivy, Silvia Dorn. Towards a sustainable management of bees of the subgenus Osmia (Megachilidae; Osmia) as fruit tree pollinators. Apidologie, Springer Verlag, 2013, 45 (1), pp.88-105. 10.1007/s13592-013-0231-8. hal-01234708 HAL Id: hal-01234708 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01234708 Submitted on 27 Nov 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Apidologie (2014) 45:88–105 Review article * INRA, DIB and Springer-Verlag France, 2013 DOI: 10.1007/s13592-013-0231-8 Towards a sustainable management of bees of the subgenus Osmia (Megachilidae; Osmia) as fruit tree pollinators Claudio SEDIVY, Silvia DORN ETH Zurich, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Applied Entomology, Schmelzbergstrasse 9/LFO, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland Received 31 January 2013 – Revised 14 June 2013 – Accepted 18 July 2013 Abstract – The limited pollination efficiency of honeybees (Apidae; Apis) for certain crop plants and, more recently, their global decline fostered commercial development of further bee species to complement crop pollination in agricultural systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera Apidae
    Hymenoptera Apidae Apis Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Description: 12 – 16mm. Variable in colour but abdomen largely orange with black bands, reddish or black Season: March to November Bombus Small Garden Bumblebee (Bombus (Megabombus) hortorum) Description: 11 – 22mm. Large bee with two yellow bands on thorax with one at the top of the abdomen, tail white. Long-tongued bee, specialising in visiting flowers with tubular corollas e.g. honeysuckle, foxglove. Nest: Usually underground Season: March to September Bombus Tree Bumblebee (Bombus (Pyrobombus) hypnorum) Description: 13 - 18mm. Has ginger-brown thorax, black abdomen with distinctive white tail Nest: In tree holes, also uses bird boxes Season: March to September Large Red-tailed Bumblebee (Bombus (Melanobombus) lapidarius) Description: 12 – 22mm. Females black with distinctive red tip to abdomen, males similar but with yellow band on thorax and yellow hairs on the face. Visits a wide range of flowers Nest: Underground or in wall cavities Season: March to October White-tailed Bumblebee (Bombus (Bombus) lucorum) Description: 10 - 20mm. Queens and workers have lemon-yellow band on thorax and abdomen with white tail. Male has yellow hairs on face and extra yellow band son thorax and abdomen Nest: Underground in old vole or mouse nests Season: February to October 2 Bombus Common Carder Bee (Bombus (Thoracobombus) pascuorum) Description: 10 - 18mm. Almost entirely covered in ginger-brown hairs with variable patches of black hairs on the abdomen Nest: usually at base of grass tussocks Season: March to October Early Bumblebee (Bombus (Pyrobombus) pratorum) Description: 9 - 16mm. One yellow band on thorax, one on abdomen which has orange tail.
    [Show full text]