In This Week's Issue

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

In This Week's Issue For Immediate Release: April 24, 2017 IN THIS WEEK’S ISSUE What, Exactly, Did Steve Bannon Do in the Movie Industry? In the May 1, 2017, issue of The New Yorker, in “A Hollywood Story” (p. 34), Connie Bruck investigates Steve Bannon’s Hol- lywood years, before he joined the worlds of media and politics, and speaks with many people who interacted with him dur- ing that period of dubious dealings, unsuccessful business ventures, and erratic, sometimes violent behavior that preceded his hold over the nativist wing of the Trump White House. Bannon moved to Los Angeles in 1987, to help Goldman Sachs ex- pand its presence in the entertainment business. He became passionate and knowledgeable about film, and boasted about his connections, his production credits, and his background in mergers and acquisitions. “He was a Republican, but not overly dogmatic, and he tried not to let his political beliefs get in the way of his work,” Bruck writes. Last November, when Bannon was named Donald Trump’s chief White House strategist, many articles highlighted an ex- traordinary fact about his Hollywood career: he had negotiated a profit participation in “Seinfeld” in 1993, two years before the show went into syndication. Forbes reported that, if Bannon had a one-per-cent share in the profits, “he would have made about $32.6 million since 1998,” and said that “Bannon’s steady ‘Seinfeld’ income” was supporting his career as a conservative propagandist. Larry David, the show’s head writer and executive producer, told Bruck, “I don’t think I ever heard of him until he surfaced with the Trump campaign and I had no idea that he was profiting from the work of industrious Jews!” It is pos- sible that Bannon’s deal was capped and paid out not long after the show went into syndication, in the fall of 1995. But, since that early period, neither CBS nor Castle Rock Entertainment nor Warner Bros. has records of payments to Bannon, if the records are as they were described to Bruck. Bruck’s reporting reveals instances of Bannon’s physical and verbal outbursts, sometimes directed toward women. Bannon’s sec- ond ex-wife had a particularly violent altercation with him, in 1996, that resulted in a 911 call. According to the police officer’s report, after the woman threatened to divorce Bannon, “[She] said she spit at him, and [he] reached up to her, from the driv- er’s seat of his car, and grabbed her left wrist. He pulled her down, as if he was trying to pull [her] into the car, over the door. [She] said Mr. Bannon grabbed at her neck, also pulling her into the car. She said that she started to fight back, striking his face so he would let go of her.” She ran into the house, telling him that she was calling 911. She said later, in a sworn divorce filing, that he screamed, “Crazy fucking cunt!” She complained to the officer about her sore neck, and he wrote, “I saw red marks on her left wrist and the right side of her neck.” Bannon was charged with spousal abuse, simple battery, and dissuad- ing a witness. His ex-wife later said that his lawyer told her that, if Bannon went to jail, “I would have no money and no way to support the children.” Bannon, she said, told her that, if she went to court, “he and his attorney would make sure that I would be the one who was guilty.” (Bannon’s lawyer denies intimidating Bannon’s wife, and Bannon declined to comment.) Bruck also quotes from a tape of Bannon, recorded without his knowledge, making crude remarks about a woman scientist, Abigail Alling, whom he encountered in the nineties. After a disagreement between the two, Bannon said to a colleague, in reference to Alling’s comments on the matter, “I am going to ram it down her fucking throat.” He went on, “I think she is a self-cen- tered, deluded young woman, and she is about to get a reality check, and I am going to deliver it to her. I am not going to have a twenty-nine-year-old bimbo criticize the people at this place for running something.” He also said, “But she’s going to pay. She’s going to pay. When this is over, she’s finished.” Later, at a pretrial interview, Ban- non was asked if he had made some of those remarks. Unaware of the tape, he claimed he had not. “I’ve never referred to Ms. Alling as a bimbo,” he said. (Bannon declined to comment.) In another instance, James Ulmer, an entertainment journalist who was profiling Bannon in 2005, recalled speaking with Bannon about the 2008 election. Ulmer was taken aback, he said, when Bannon began talking about Hillary Clinton’s likely campaign for the Presidency in the next election. According to Ulmer’s memory of the conversation, Bannon told him, in graphic terms, that he and others were pre- paring to destroy Hillary in 2008. A source close to Bannon says that this conversation never took place, and that Bannon never met Ulmer in person. Bannon didn’t find much success in traditional Hollywood films. After meeting David Bossie, a longtime opponent of Bill and Hillary Clinton and the president and chair- man of the conservative nonprofit Citizens United, he became involved in political MARK ULRIKSEN documentaries. In 2010, after releasing three documentaries with Citizens United, Bannon became a fixture at Tea Party ral- lies and conventions across the country. He also started appearing regularly on Fox News. During this time, Bannon went through “a visible transformation,” a friend said. “In his days in business, he dressed like an investment banker from Connect- icut—shirt and jacket, tie or not, boring men’s shoes, a short, conventional men’s haircut. But he couldn’t show up at the Tea Party dressed like that. He started dressing more casually. There was this other side of him—he was from the South, he could be in a sports bar in West Virginia, and he would be accepted.” The friend continued, “He never fit in in the world of invest- ment banking—he was this gauche Irish kid. Never fit in in the Hollywood world—his politics were much too conservative. Never fit in in the mainstream Republican world—he wasn’t uptight like them. But then he got embraced by the Tea Party world. He really started playing that role, and he came into his own.” Bruck writes, “Many who did have dealings with Bannon were unwilling to be interviewed. Others would not speak for at- tribution, saying that they feared what he might do with the instruments of government—one spoke of a possible I.R.S. audit.” One colleague recalled that Bannon seemed out of place in Hollywood: “The business runs on talent relationships. He had this real will-to-power vibe that was so off-putting. He came on so strong, and in a way that I couldn’t imagine he would be successful with creative people.” Barry Diller told Bruck, “I never heard of him, prior to Trumpism. And no one I know knew him in his so-called Hollywood period.” After Fifty-Two Years of Civil War, Former Guerrillas Seek a Return to Society In “Out of the Jungle” (p. 28), Jon Lee Anderson reports from Colombia, and sits down with the guerrilla commander Car- los Antonio Lozada, who helped end the FARC’s fifty-two-year insurrection. As the deadline for disarmament approaches, he speaks with Lozada, with Colombia’s President, Juan Manuel Santos, and with former guerrillas about the possibilities and challenges of reintegrating former guerrillas into society. More than fifty years ago, Colombia’s two major political parties agreed to alternate terms of power, in a coalition called the National Front. All those outside the Front were effectively shut out, and the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia—the FARC—was founded in the early sixties to carry out a war against the state. Against his parents’ wishes, Lozada dropped out of school and headed for the countryside to join the guerrillas, in 1978. Because he has spent decades shuttling between jungle outposts and Colombia’s urban power centers, he is a crucial leader for the FARC as it tries to reëngage with the world. By the terms of the peace treaty, some seven thousand FARC fighters will sub- mit to a process of transitional justice. In exchange for full confessions and reparations to victims, those who committed war crimes will receive “restorative sanctions,” which offer the possibility of community work rather than prison. The FARC will be- come a political party, and, before long, former guerrillas will be able to run for public office. After decades of fighting for Marx- ist ideas, Lozada is now trying to devise “economic projects that, in coöperative form, can help sustain the group.” Most of the combatants have been living as fugitives in their own country, and now they have to contemplate returning to towns and fam- ilies they have not seen in years. But many Colombians despise the FARC, and it will be difficult to persuade employees to hire ex-guerrillas—especially when jobs are already scarce. Drug trafficking could provide the only available work for former fight- ers. “It’s a problem,” Lozada said. “Unless they have a very strong ideological understanding, some will be vulnerable to the ap- peal of the narco world.” Anderson asked young guerrillas waiting to be reintegrated into Colombian society what they wanted to do with their lives when peace came.
Recommended publications
  • America's Last Hope?
    Wars on Christians Not Hitler’s Pope Empire or Umpire? Food Rights Fight ANDREW DORAN JOHN RODDEN & JOHN ROSSI ANDREW J. BACEVICH MARK NUGENT JULY/AUGUST 2013 ì ì#ììeìì ì ì # America’s Last Hope? ììeì ì ìeì ì ìì #ì ìeì ìì ! $9.99 US/Canada theamericanconservative.com Visit alphapub.com for FREE eBooks and Natural-law Essays We read that researchers have used new technology to fi nd proof behind biblical stories such as the Parting of the Red Sea and the Burning Bush. Our writing uses a biblical story with a deadly result that is still happening today. This biblical event is the creator’s command to Adam: “Of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat or you “Just found your site. will surely die.” Adam and Eve did eat the fruit of that tree, and for I was quite impressed disobeying the creator, they suffered much trouble and fi nally died. and look forward to Experience tells us that people worldwide are still acting on hours of enjoyment their judgments of good and evil. Now, consider what happens to and learning. Thanks.” millions of them every day? They die! It would follow that those - Frank whose behavior is based on their defi nitions of good and evil be- come subject to the creator’s warning, “or you will surely die.” We know that when people conform to creation’s laws of physics, right action always results. Children learn to walk and run by con- forming to all applicable natural laws.
    [Show full text]
  • An Agenda for a Greener, Freer, Smarter Right
    Oliver Stone for Pres? Nixon at 100 Everyday Anarchy The Pope’s Other Brain JOHN BUFFALO MAILER PAT BUCHANAN GENE CALLAHAN JEREMY BEER JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2013 ì ì#ììeìì ì ì # An agenda for a greener, freer, smarter right $4.95 US/Canada theamericanconservative.com Enjoy TheBlaze at no extra charge with America’s Top 250 package add it to another package for just $5 a month GLENN 1-888-675-6174 dish.com/theblaze BECK DISH Qualifying DISH service requires participation in qualifying plan and subscription to qualifying programming. Depending on qualifying plan, one or moree of the following will apply – activation fee (minimum $99), Social Security Number, credit approval,approval, 24-month Agreement, early cancellation fee. Offers end 1/16/13. Offer is subject to the terms of the Promotional and Residential Customer Agreements. AllAll prices,prices, packages, programming, features, functionality and offers subject to changechange withoutwithout notice.notice. © 2012, DISH Network L.L.C. All rights reserved. 252326_7_x_9.5.indd 1 12/6/12 4:43 PM Vol. 12, No. 1, January/February 2013 7 15 18 ARTICLES COVER STORY ARTS & LETTERS 15 Free Kentucky Project 12 Counterculture Conservatism 42 Two Cheers for Anarchism: Rep. "omas Massie continues An agenda for the right Six Easy Pieces on Autonomy, Ron Paul’s revolution. ANDREW J. BACEVICH Dignity, and Meaningful Work W. JAMES ANTLE III and Play by James C. Scott FRONT LINES GENE CALLAHAN 18 Oliver Stone vs. the Empire He talks to TAC about 7 Want to #x America? 45 Debating Same-Sex Marriage the bipartisan security state.
    [Show full text]
  • An Augustinian Correction to a Faulty Option: the Politics of Salt and Light
    Journal of Moral Theology, Vol. 10, No. 1 (2021): 46–72 An Augustinian Correction to a Faulty Option: The Politics of Salt and Light Anthony Crescio INCE ITS PUBLICATION IN 2017, Rod Dreher’s The Benedict Option: A Strategy for Christians in a Post-Christian Nation has given rise to a cottage industry, including a wide range of S publications on the subject (either in support of or against) and conferences across the country. To be sure, a Christian perspective fully supports many elements in Dreher’s thought, like his calls for homes to become places of spiritual learning and growth,1 that institu- tions of Christian education take seriously their role in Christian for- mation,2 and the Church undergo a ressourcement type of renewal in all facets of its life.3 However, it is in the last area of ecclesiology where Dreher’s option ultimately fails in several ways because he does not grasp the full import of the sacramental ontology. While he rightly advocates a need for recovering it, he falls short in implementing it.4 His is, put simply, a failure of the imagination which has disastrous consequences for his understanding of how the church ought to engage in the political sphere. In order to demonstrate this failure, I adopt Dreher’s ressourcement methodology5 by engaging Augustine of Hippo as the primary inter- locutor and proceeding by way of four main steps. First, I discuss three ways Dreher’s work represents a failure of imagination. With the sec- ond step, I lay out Augustine’s sacramental metaphysics and corre- sponding ecclesiology.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Benedict Option Taki: the Movie ANDREW BACEVICH Justin Raimondo ROD DREHER Taki
    One Percent America Kennedy’s Wars St. Benedict Option Taki: The Movie ANDREW BACEVICH JUSTIN RAIMONDO ROD DREHER TAKI NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2013 IDEAS OVER IDEOLOGY • PRINCIPLES OVER PARTY WHY THE TEA PARTY CAN’T GOVERN by DANIEL MCCARTHY $9.99 US/Canada theamericanconservative.com “One of the best liberal arts colleges in America.” - George Weigel DISCOVER THE DIFFERENCE Catholic Liberal Arts at Its Best! Enter Our Full-Tuition SCHOLARSHIP Competition! Rigorous Liberal Arts Curriculum Integrated Core Emphasizing Research, Written & Oral Communication Scholarships and Robust Financial Aid Program Integrated Career Development Program Leadership and Internship Opportunities Semester in Rome and Summer Ireland Programs Intercollegiate Athletic Program Drama, Music, and Performance Opportunities Mission Trips and Outreach Programs Authentic Catholic Culture and Liturgical Celebrations Front Royal, Virginia 800.877.5456 Tomorrow’s Leaders. Here Today. christendom.edu Vol. 12, No. 6, November/December 2013 2224 3228 40 COVER STORY FRONT LINES ARTS & LETTERS 12 Why the Tea Party Can’t Govern 6 Mike Lee, rugged 40 Goliath: Life and Loathing Its conservatism is a product of communitarian in Greater Israel by Max the disco era. JONATHAN COPPAGE Blumenthal DANIEL MCCARTHY 7 The magazine for crunchy cons SCOTT MCCONNELL GRACY OLMSTEAD artIcles 44 Rebound: Getting America Back 9 Britain’s Tories need a woman. to Great by Kim R. Holmes 16 Benedict Option EMMA ELLIOTT FREIRE JUSTIN LOGAN The promise of Christian 46 Conservative Internationalism: intentional communities COMMentary ROD DREHER Armed Diplomacy Under Jefferson, Polk, Truman, and 5 Turning right since 2012 20 One Percent Republic Reagan by Henry Nau Inequality applies to military 11 Has the NSA gone too far? MICHAEL C.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Kit “Totally Heterodox and Orthogonal to Our Normal Political Divisions
    Media Kit www.theamericanconservative.com “Totally heterodox and orthogonal to our normal political divisions. Always thought-provoking.” —Chris Hayes, MSNBC 2 the american conservative media kit Demographics The American Conservative publishes a bimonthly print magazine and website. Average monthly unique visitors to www.TheAmericanConservative.com*: 557,000 Average monthly visits: 1,400,000 Average monthly page impressions: 2,400,000 *all stats taken over period November 2016–April 2017 Readers of www.TheAmericanConservative.com are highly educated, affluent, and independently-minded: % 44 have some postgraduate degree % 21 have a toutal household income greater than $100k % 61 are registered Independent % 95 male % 79 age 45 or younger the american conservative media kit 3 TAC on Twitter 4 the american conservative media kit “The American Conservative has become one of the more dynamic spots on the political Web. Writers like Rod Dreher and Daniel Larison tend to be suspicious of bigness: big corporations, big government, a big military, concentrated power and concentrated wealth.” —David Brooks, The New York Times the american conservative media kit 5 print advertising General Advertising Rates 4-color Black and White Frequency Frequency Ad Sizes 1x 3x 6x Ad Sizes 1x 3x 6x Full Page $3,550 $3,195 $2,876 Full Page $2,876 $2,588 $2,329 2/3 2,840 2,556 2,300 2/3 2,300 2,070 1,863 1/2 horizontal 2,272 2,045 1,840 1/2 horizontal 1,840 1,656 1,491 1/2 island 2,272 2,045 1,840 1/2 island 1,840 1,656 1,491 1/3 vertical 1,818 1,636 1,472 1/3
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Evangelical Support For, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 9-1-2020 Understanding Evangelical Support for, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election Joseph Thomas Zichterman Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Political Science Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Zichterman, Joseph Thomas, "Understanding Evangelical Support for, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election" (2020). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 5570. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.7444 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Understanding Evangelical Support for, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election by Joseph Thomas Zichterman A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Political Science Thesis Committee: Richard Clucas, Chair Jack Miller Kim Williams Portland State University 2020 Abstract This thesis addressed the conundrum that 81 percent of evangelicals supported Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election, despite the fact that his character and comportment commonly did not exemplify the values and ideals that they professed. This was particularly perplexing to many outside (and within) evangelical circles, because as leaders of America’s “Moral Majority” for almost four decades, prior to Trump’s campaign, evangelicals had insisted that only candidates who set a high standard for personal integrity and civic decency, were qualified to serve as president.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Rod Dreher's Speech
    ROD DREHER TOUR CAMPION COLLEGE AUSTRALIA May 2019 Thank you for welcoming me to Australia. I wish I were here with good news. Actually, I believe I do have good news. I am not optimistic, but I am hopeful. Hope, as I will explain, is not the same thing as optimism. To find our way to hope, we first have to be painfully honest about the bad news. These are not normal times. We in the West are in the worst spiritual and social crisis since the collapse of the Roman Empire. We don’t see this collapse clearly because it is hidden by our wealth. But make no mistake: the fundamental pillars of Western civilization are crumbling – none more consequentially than the Church. Our crisis is actually a combination of crises. It is a crisis of MEANING. In the postmodern West, we have arrived at a place where many people no longer believe that meaning exists at all, and that we can know it. The modern historian Yuval Noah Harari says that the modern world can be characterized by a simple transaction: people have exchanged MEANING for POWER. That is, to gain the right to do whatever we desire with our bodies and with nature, we surrender the idea that objective meaning exists. We are free to do as we like, but the cost of that freedom is de facto nihilism. Closely related to that, It is also a crisis of TRUTH. We have lost the ability to determine what is true or false. We can no longer agree on a narrative that allows us to reason together.
    [Show full text]
  • The Benedict Option
    Digital Collections @ Dordt Faculty Work Comprehensive List 4-2017 iAt Book Club: The Benedict Option Donald Roth Dordt College, [email protected] Scott Culpepper Dordt College, [email protected] Erin Olson Dordt College, [email protected] Robert Lancaster Dordt College, [email protected] Gustavo Maya Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.dordt.edu/faculty_work Part of the Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Roth, D., Culpepper, S., Olson, E., Lancaster, R., & Maya, G. (2017). iAt Book Club: The Benedict Option. Retrieved from https://digitalcollections.dordt.edu/faculty_work/741 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Collections @ Dordt. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Work Comprehensive List by an authorized administrator of Digital Collections @ Dordt. For more information, please contact [email protected]. iAt Book Club: The Benedict Option Abstract This submission marks iAt's first book club series eaturingf the book, "The Benedict Option: A Strategy for Christians in a Post-Christian Nation," by Rod Dreher. Various voices have contributed to the series as they interacted with one another and responded to the book. Series contributors are Donald Roth, Scott Culpepper, Gustavo Maya, Erin Olson, and Robert Lancaster. Access publisher's site and additional readers' comments: http://inallthings.org/tag/book-club/ Keywords In All Things, book club, book review, The Benedict Option, Rod Dreher Disciplines Christianity Comments In
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Literature Review of Populism, Religion and Emotions
    religions Article A Systematic Literature Review of Populism, Religion and Emotions Ihsan Yilmaz 1,* and Nicholas Morieson 2 1 Alfred Deakin Institute for Citizenship and Globalization, Deakin University, Melbourne 3125, Australia 2 The Institute for Religion, Politics and Society, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne 3065, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: This paper examines the existing literature on the relationship between religion and populism, and is intended as a starting point for further examination of the relationships between populism, religion, and emotions. This paper systematically reviews the various aspects of the populist phenomenon. After a discussion on different definitions of populism, this paper looks at how the literature discusses the causes of populism, mainly socio-economic factors and emotive factors. Then it discusses how religion and populism interact and can be divided in two broad categories of religious populism and identitarian populism. While, on the surface, the two share similarities, this paper reviews populist manifestations across the world to draw the distinct features between the two forms. Lastly, while pointing out the salient features of religious populism and identitarian populism, this study points out gaps in the research on the relationship between religious populism and other phenomena such as transnational populism, the psychology of populism, the role of emotions in creating support for populism, and populism in Western and non-Western contexts for future areas of research in the field. Citation: Yilmaz, Ihsan, and Keywords: religious populism; identitarian populism; populism; religion; emotions; transna- Nicholas Morieson. 2021. A tional populism Systematic Literature Review of Populism, Religion and Emotions.
    [Show full text]
  • Forget Reaganreagan His Foreign Policy Was Right for His Time—Not Ours
    Our Lousy Generals Immigration Reformed American Pravda Sex, Spies & the ’60s ANDREW J. BACEVICH WILLIAM W. CHIP RON UNZ CHRISTOPHER SANDFORD MAY/JUNE 2013 IDEAS OVER IDEOLOGY • PRINCIPLES OVER PARTY ForgetForget ReaganReagan His foreign policy was right for his time—not ours $9.99 US/Canada theamericanconservative.com Meet Pope Francis The Pope from the End of the Earth This lavishly illustrated volume by bestselling author Thomas J. Craughwell commemorates the election of Francis—first Pope from the New World—and explores in fascinating detail who he is and what his papacy will mean for the Church. • Forward by Cardinal Seán O’Malley. • Over 60 full-color photographs of Francis’s youth, priesthood and journey to Rome. • In-depth biography, from Francis’s birth and early years, to his mystical experience as a teen, to his ministry as priest and bishop with a heart for the poor and the unflagging courage to teach and defend the Faith. • Francis’s very first homilies as Pope. • Supplemental sections on Catholic beliefs, practices and traditions. $22.95 978-1-618-90136-1 • Hardcover • 176 pgs American Conservative Readers: Save $10 when you use coupon code TANGiftTAC at TANBooks.com. Special discount code expires 8/31/2013. Available at booksellers everywhere and at TANBooks.com e Publisher You Can Trust With Your Faith 58 THE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE 1-800-437-5876MAY/JUNE 2013 Vol. 12, No. 3, May/June 2013 22 28 51 COVER STORY FRONT LINES ARTS & LETTERS 12 Reagan, Hawk or Dove? 7 Defense spending isn’t 40 The Generals: American The right foreign-policy lessons defense strength Military Command From to take from the 40th president WILLIAM S.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump Can't Save American Christianity
    https://nyti.ms/2uizJ2Y The Opinion Pages | OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR Trump Can’t Save American Christianity By ROD DREHER AUG. 2, 2017 According to Genesis 1, in four days, God made the heavens, the earth and all the vegetation upon it. But four days after Anthony Scaramucci’s filthy tirade went public, Team Trump’s evangelical all-stars — pastors and prominent laity who hustle noisily around the Oval Office trying to find an amen corner — still had not figured out what to say. Fortunately, the White House relieved them of that onerous task by firing Mr. Scaramucci — not, please note, on the president’s initiative, but rather at the request of John Kelly, the new chief of staff. Meanwhile, the Christian Broadcasting Network ran a puff piece proclaiming that a “spiritual awakening is underway at the White House,” thanks to a Bible study with what “has been called the most evangelical cabinet in history.” That ought to still any skepticism emerging among the true believers for a while. Is there anything Donald Trump can do to alienate evangelicals and other conservative Christians who support him? By now, it’s hard to think of what that might be. These are people who would never let men with the morals and the mouths of Mr. Trump and Mr. Scaramucci date their own daughters. And yet, Team Trump has no more slavishly loyal constituency. This is not only wrong, but tragically so. The most pressing problem Christianity faces is not in politics. It’s in parishes. It’s with the pastors. Most of all, it’s among an increasingly faithless people.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Viewpoint Diversity Shareholder Proposals
    AN INTRODUCTION TO VIEWPOINT DIVERSITY SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS Stefan J. Padfield Abstract In this Article, Part I provide a primer on viewpoint diversity shareholder proposals. Following the Introduction, the Article proceeds into Part II which provides a brief overview of shareholder proposals. Such proposals have been described as having “transformed the corporate landscape in the U.S.” over the last 30 years.1 Part III explains the need for viewpoint diversity proposals. Part IV provides some examples of viewpoint diversity proposals, including proposals related to (1) protection of employees, (2) selection of board and related members, and (3) viewpoint discrimination in policymaking. Part V provides concluding remarks. I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 272 II. WHAT ARE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS? .............................................. 277 III. WHY DO WE NEED VIEWPOINT DIVERSITY PROPOSALS? ................ 278 IV. EXAMPLES OF VIEWPOINT DIVERSITY PROPOSALS ........................... 280 A. Protection of Employees .................................................................. 281 B. Selection of Board and Related Members ......................................... 289 C. Viewpoint Discrimination in Policy-Making ................................... 291 V. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................. 293 Professor, University of Akron School of Law. This Article was written in response to an invitation
    [Show full text]