DOCSLIB.ORG

Petronet LNG Trading Margins Hurt Profitability Phillipcapital (India) Pvt

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Petronet LNG Trading Margins Hurt Profitability Phillipcapital (India) Pvt Petronet LNG Trading margins hurt profitability PhillipCapital (India) Pvt. Ltd. OIL & GAS: Quarterly Update 4 August 2014 EBITDA lower than estimate led by trading margin decline, depreciation helps the PAT: Petronet’s EBITDA at Rs3.58bn was 15.2% lower than our estimate, on NEUTRAL account of lower than expected marketing margins on the spot volumes. Despite PLNG IN | CMP RS 180 higher than expected volumes processed (10.9% higher than estimate at 125.2 TARGET RS 170 (‐6%) TBTU’s); gross profitability (Rs4.61bn) was lower than our estimates due to sudden decline in LNG prices leading to losses on the trading volumes. This Company Data coupled with rise in share of low margin tolling volumes (24.9TBTU’s against O/S SHARES (MN) : 750 MARKET CAP (RSBN) : 140 estimate of 11.2TBTU’s and 4QFY14 volumes of 4.5 TBTU’s) led to lower than MARKET CAP (USDBN) : 2.3 estimated operating profits. Depreciation during the quarter was lower than the 52 ‐ WK HI/LO (RS) : 190 / 103 estimates due to change in depreciation policy (depreciation now based on LIQUIDITY 3M (USDMN) : 6.0 FACE VALUE (RS) : 10 effective life of 25 years against the earlier mandated life of 18 years). PAT at Rs1.57bn was lower than our estimate of Rs1.73bn. Share Holding Pattern, % PROMOTERS : 50.0 FII / NRI : 32.6 Key call highlights: 1/Dahej’s 2nd Jetty has been commissioned on 18th April FI / MF : 3.3 2014; thereby boosting the Jetty handling capacity to 17.5MMTPA, however NON PROMOTER CORP. HOLDINGS : 1.7 PUBLIC & OTHERS : 12.5 despite the decline in LNG prices management guided that re‐gasification volumes are unlikely to rise significantly from current levels. 2/Kochi terminal Price Performance, % 1mth 3mth 1yr volumes continue to remain subdued with operating losses at Rs~160mn. ABS 6.4 28.2 59.7 3/Leasing the storage at Kochi terminal is likely to be done in 2QFY15. 4/Petronet REL TO BSE 6.6 14.6 27.8 has got the approval from the state government for the Gangavaram terminal; Price Vs. Sensex (Rebased values) management is likely to now proceed with the sourcing of the gas and customer tie‐up. 5/Management expects financial closure of the Gangavaram terminal over 270 240 the next 1 year. 6/Change in depreciation policy led to Rs250‐300mn fall in 210 depreciation charge. 180 150 Valuation & Outlook: PLNG’s stock has appreciated ~75% from its lows on 120 account of improved visibility on utilization of Dahej terminal (back‐to‐back 90 contracts for 14.5MMTPA volumes and likely ONGC contract for replacement of 60 C2‐C3 of ~0.9MMTPA) and correction in spot LNG prices to ~US$10.5/mmbtu. 30 Apr/10 Apr/11 Apr/12 Apr/13 Apr/14 While some hold Kochi terminal’s utilization rate could improve following any Petronet LNG BSE Sensex early resolution of the entangled pipeline, that would evacuate LNG from Kochi, Source: Phillip Capital India Research we highlight with GAIL having already taken a write off, any amicable solution could take longer. Besides, our estimates fully captures medium term upsides Other Key Ratios Rs mn FY14E FY15E FY16E with 2/3/4.1 MMTPA in FY17‐19E, this coupled with expensive valuations turns Net Sales 377,476 439,670 448,623 risk‐reward unfavorable. We believe the current valuations are demanding and Ebidta 14,984 16,821 20,019 factors in all near term positives leaving little room for upside from current levels Net Profit 7,119 7,438 9,776 (EV/CE ~1.5x FY16). On FY16E, there seems to be a limited upside at ~15x P/E, EPS, Rs 9.5 9.9 13.0 1.2x EV/GCI and 1.5x EV/CE. We believe, on account of rich valuations +2SD (std PER, X 19.0 18.1 13.8 EV/EBIDTA, x 10.3 9.4 7.8 deviation) 1‐year forward PE and more than +1SD in case of EV/Core EBITDA EV/Net Sales, x 2.7 2.4 2.2 leaves limited scope for further upsides in the near term. We recently ROE, % 14.3 13.5 15.6 downgraded our recommendation to ‘NEUTRAL’ with a revised price target of Debt/Equity, % 64.1 65.9 63.2 Rs170/share. We reduce marketing margins assumption for FY15 due to weak Source: PhillipCapital India Research Est. margins reported in Q1FY15 and also account for change in depreciation policy as Gauri Anand (+ 9122 66679943) a result our EPS is enhanced by about 5%. (For detailed note on Petronet ‐ [email protected] th Running out of gas dated 28 July Click here). Deepak Pareek (+ 9122 6667 9950) [email protected] Please refer to Disclosures and Disclaimers at the end of the Research Report. 4 August 2014 / INDIA EQUITY RESEARCH / PETRONET LNG COMPANY UPDATE Q1FY15 Results result Y/E Mar Q1FY15 Q1FY14 YoY gr. (%) Q4FY14 FY14 FY13 YoY gr. (%) Net Sales 101,608 84,442 20.3 104,278 377,476 314,668 20.0 Expenditure Raw material 96,995 79,593 21.9 99,344 358,424 292,098 22.7 % of net sales 95.5 94.3 95.3 95.0 92.8 Personnel cost 122 86 42.1 195 466 370 26.0 % of net sales 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 Other operating expenses 913 785 16.3 871 3,601 2,819 27.8 % of net sales 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.0 0.9 EBITDA 3,578 3,978 (10.1) 3,868 14,984 19,381 (22.7) Margin (%) 3.5 4.7 3.7 4.0 6.2 Depreciation 770 467 64.9 1,000 3,081 1,866 65.1 EBIT 2,808 3,511 (20.0) 2,868 11,903 17,515 (32.0) Interest 784 240 226.5 786 2,196 1,184 85.4 Other Income 353 152 131.8 308 838 865 (3.2) PBT 2,377 3,423 (30.6) 2,389 10,545 17,197 (38.7) Total taxes 810 1,170 (30.8) 696 3,426 5,710 (40.0) ETR (%) 34.1 34.2 29.1 32.5 33.2 Rep. PAT 1,567 2,253 (30.5) 1,693 7,119 11,487 (38.0) Exceptional Items ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Adj. PAT 1,567 2,253 (30.5) 1,693 7,119 11,487 (38.0) Margin (%) 1.5 2.7 1.6 1.9 3.7 Operational metrics Y/E Mar Q1FY15 Q1FY14 YoY gr. (%) Q4FY14 FY14 FY13 YoY gr. (%) Contracted Sales (TBTUs) 96.4 92.3 4.5 92.0 374 377 (0.8) Spot Volumes (TBTUs) 17.4 19.0 (8.2) 20.8 66 103 (36.1) Tolling Volumes (TBTUs) 24.9 18.3 36.1 4.5 53 45 16.8 EBITDA/TBTU 25.8 30.7 (16.0) 33.0 30.4 36.9 (17.6) Source: Company, PhillipCapital India Research Margin Bridge: Trading margins slips Marketing margins on spot volumes Regasification on Fixed , spot and Tolling volumes 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% ‐20% Q4FY11 Q1FY12 Q2FY12 Q3FY12 Q4FY12 Q1FY13 Q2FY13 Q3FY13 Q4FY13 Q1FY14 Q2FY14 Q3FY14 Q4FY14 Q1FY15 Source: PhillipCapital India Research Estimates – 2 of 9 – 4 August 2014 / INDIA EQUITY RESEARCH / PETRONET LNG COMPANY UPDATE Blended margin trend 40.9 45 40.4 39.8 39.8 38.6 38.4 36.7 40 32.7 32.1 34.3 32.3 31.8 30.3 35 30.1 29.1 28.9 26.3 26.0 30 25.2 22.1 25 20.4 TBTU) / 20 (Rs 15 10 5 0 Q1FY10 Q2FY10 Q3FY10 Q4FY10 Q1FY11 Q2FY11 Q3FY11 Q4FY11 Q1FY12 Q2FY12 Q3FY12 Q4FY12 Q1FY13 Q2FY13 Q3FY13 Q4FY13 Q1FY14 Q2FY14 Q3FY14 Q4FY14 Q1FY15 Source: PhillipCapital India Research Estimates R‐LNG Volumes Contracted LNG Sales in TBTUs 120 Spot cargo & Tolling volumes sales in TBTUs (Incl. RGPPL Gas) 100 80 TBTUs 60 40 20 0 Q1FY11 Q2FY11 Q3FY11 Q4FY11 Q1FY12 Q2FY12 Q3FY12 Q4FY12 Q1FY13 Q2FY13 Q3FY13 Q4FY13 Q1FY14 Q2FY14 Q3FY14 Q4FY14 Q1FY15 Source: PhillipCapital India Research Estimates – 3 of 9 – 4 August 2014 / INDIA EQUITY RESEARCH / PETRONET LNG COMPANY UPDATE Capacity Utilization higher due to improved Dahej Utilization 120% 110% 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% Q1FY12 Q2FY12 Q3FY12 Q4FY12 Q1FY13 Q2FY13 Q3FY13 Q4FY13 Q1FY14 Q2FY14 Q3FY14 Q4FY14 Q1FY15 Source: PhillipCapital India Research Estimates Operating revenue – Growth trend (YoY) Total operating revenues Growth (RHS) 120,000 100 100,000 80 80,000 60 m) 60,000 40 (%) (Rs 40,000 20 20,000 0 ‐ ‐20 Q1FY11 Q2FY11 Q3FY11 Q4FY11 Q1FY12 Q2FY12 Q3FY12 Q4FY12 Q1FY13 Q2FY13 Q3FY13 Q4FY13 Q1FY14 Q2FY14 Q3FY14 Q4FY14 Q1FY15 Source: PhillipCapital India Research Estimates Operating performance trend 6,000 Operating Profit Margin (RHS) 12 5,000 10 4,000 8 m) 3,000 6 (%) (Rs 2,000 4 1,000 2 ‐ 0 Q1FY11 Q2FY11 Q3FY11 Q4FY11 Q1FY12 Q2FY12 Q3FY12 Q4FY12 Q1FY13 Q2FY13 Q3FY13 Q4FY13 Q1FY14 Q2FY14 Q3FY14 Q4FY14 Q1FY15 Source: PhillipCapital India Research Estimates – 4 of 9 – 4 August 2014 / INDIA EQUITY RESEARCH / PETRONET LNG COMPANY UPDATE PAT weighed down by higher interest and depreciation on Kochi commissioning PAT Growth (RHS) 3,500 150 3,000 100 2,500 50 m) 2,000 (Rs (%) 1,500 0 1,000 ‐50 500 ‐ ‐100 Q1FY11 Q2FY11 Q3FY11 Q4FY11 Q1FY12 Q2FY12 Q3FY12 Q4FY12 Q1FY13 Q2FY13 Q3FY13 Q4FY13 Q1FY14 Q2FY14 Q3FY14 Q4FY14 Q1FY15 Source: PhillipCapital India Research Estimates – 5 of 9 – 4 August 2014 / INDIA EQUITY RESEARCH / PETRONET LNG COMPANY UPDATE Financials Income Statement Cash Flow Y/E Mar, Rs mn FY13 FY14 FY15E FY16E Y/E Mar, Rs mn FY13 FY14 FY15E FY16E Net sales 314,674 377,476 439,670 448,623 Pre‐tax profit 17,203 10,545 11,138 14,638 Growth, % 39 20 16 2 Depreciation 1,866 3,081 3,397 3,558 Total income 314,674 377,476 439,670 448,623 Chg in working capital 5,194 -7,559 2,565 -107 Raw material expenses ‐293,050 ‐358,424 ‐418,134 ‐423,312 Total tax paid -5,430 -1,806 -3,404 -4,474 Employee expenses ‐370 ‐466 ‐480 ‐528 Cash flow from operating activities 18,833 4,261 13,696 13,616 Other Operating expenses ‐2,819 ‐3,601 ‐4,235 ‐4,764 Capital expenditure -10,635 -7,647 -15,700 -8,900 EBITDA (Core) 18,436 14,984 16,821 20,019 Cash flow from investing activities -10,635 -7,647 -15,700 -8,900 Growth, % 0.8 (18.7) 12.3 19.0 Free cash flow 8,197 -3,386 -2,004 4,716 Margin, % 5.9 4.0 3.8 4.5 Equity raised/(repaid) 9,299 5,364 5,433 7,470 Depreciation ‐1,866 ‐3,081 ‐3,397 ‐3,558 Debt raised/(repaid) -3,158 4,783 4,500 3,188 EBIT 16,570 11,903 13,424 16,461 Dividend (incl.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Return on Assets and Its Decomposition Into Operating and Non- Operating Segments
    International Journal of Latest Engineering and Management Research (IJLEMR) ISSN: 2455-4847 www.ijlemr.com || Volume 02 - Issue 09 || September 2017 || PP. 22-31 Return on Assets and Its Decomposition into Operating and Non- Operating Segments C.A. (Dr.) Pramod Kumar Pandey Associate Professor, National Institute of Financial Management, Faridabad Abstract: Return on total assets (ROA) is a significant indicator of growth of business operations of an entity. It is broader concept than Return on equity (ROE) and Return on investment (ROI). Increase in Return on total assets (ROA) creates wealth for all stakeholders as against Return on Equity (ROE) which creates returns only for Equity Shareholders. This paper has analyzed Return on total assets (ROA), Return on equity (ROE) and Earnings per share (EPS) after decomposition of each into operating and non-operating segments. This paper concludes that for better financial analysis both operating and non-operating segments of return on total assets (ROA), Return on investment (ROE) and Earnings per share (EPS) should be analyzed. Keywords: ROA, ROI, ROE, Operating and Non-operating JEL CLASSIFICATION: M41, G32, G33 and G34 I. Introduction Return on total assets (ROA) is a significant indicator of growth of business operations of an entity. It is broader concept than return on equity (ROE) and return on investment (ROI). Increase in Return on total assets (ROA) creates wealth for all stakeholders as against Return on Equity (ROE) which creates returns only for Equity Shareholders. Further, Return on investment (ROI) takes into consideration only shareholders and lenders but ignores current liabilities. It tells how much return has been generated by investing Rupee one of the capital employed.
    [Show full text]
  • Equity Valuation Using Multiples: an Empirical Investigation
    Equity Valuation Using Multiples: An Empirical Investigation DISSERTATION of the University of St.Gallen Graduate School of Business Administration, Economics, Law and Social Sciences (HSG) to obtain the title of Doctor of Business Administration submitted by Andreas Schreiner from Austria Approved on the application of Prof. Dr. Klaus Spremann and Prof. Dr. Thomas Berndt Dissertation no. 3313 Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden 2007 The University of St. Gallen, Graduate School of Business Administration, Eco- nomics, Law and Social Sciences (HSG) hereby consents to the printing of the pre- sent dissertation, without hereby expressing any opinion on the views herein ex- pressed. St. Gallen, January 22, 2007 The President: Prof. Ernst Mohr, Ph.D. Foreword Accounting-based market multiples are the most common technique in equity valuation. Multiples are used in research reports and stock recommendations of both buy-side and sell-side analysts, in fairness opinions and pitch books of investment bankers, or at road shows of firms seeking an IPO. Even in cases where the value of a corporation is primarily determined with discounted cash flow, multiples such as P/E or market-to-book play the important role of providing a second opinion. Mul- tiples thus form an important basis of investment and transaction decisions of vari- ous types of investors including corporate executives, hedge funds, institutional in- vestors, private equity firms, and also private investors. In spite of their prevalent usage in practice, not so much theoretical back- ground is provided to guide the practical application of multiples. The literature on corporate valuation gives only sparse evidence on how to apply multiples or on why individual multiples or comparable firms should be selected in a particular context.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Changes in Return on Assets, Return on Equity, and Economic Value Added to the Stock Price Changes and Its Impact on Earnings Per Share
    Research Journal of Finance and Accounting www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1697 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2847 (Online) Vol.6, No.6, 2015 The Effect of Changes in Return on Assets, Return on Equity, and Economic Value Added to the Stock Price Changes and Its Impact on Earnings Per Share Dyah Purnamasari Lecturer of Widyatama University Bandung & Doctoral Students of Management Department, Faculty of Economics and Business, Pansudan University, Bandung, Indonesia 1. Introduction Along with the development of economic globalization are experiencing rapid change and development, the reality show that will affect the development of the business world. Competition between firms regional, national, and international heavier. Companies are required to be able to withstand competition in the continuity of the wheels of business. Companies are not only to be able to compete in the trade market, but also in the capital markets. The capital market is a means to make investments that allow investors to diversify investments, forming a portfolio according to the risk they were willing to bear the expected profit rate. Investments in securities are also liquid (easily changed), therefore it is important for the company always pay attention to the interests of the owners of capital by way of maximizing the value of the company, because the value of the company is a measure of the success of the operations are financial functions. Capital markets and securities industry is one of the indicators to assess a country's economy going well or not. This is due to the company in the stock market are large companies and credible in the country concerned, so if there is a decrease in the performance of the stock market can be said to have occurred also a decline in the performance of the real sector (Sutrisno, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Growth in Sales and Value Creation in Terms of the Financial
    University of Pretoria etd – De Wet, J H v H (2004) CHAPTER 6 GROWTH IN SALES AND VALUE CREATION IN TERMS OF THE FINANCIAL STRATEGY MATRIX 6.1 INTRODUCTION It is very important for all companies to manage growth. It is possible for a company to grow without adding value, and the quality of the growth, or lack of it, is revealed by the calculation of the EVA for that particular company. A positive EVA (or NPV) for an expansion project indicates that the growth in assets and sales in terms of that project will add value after taking into account the full cost of capital. This issue has been dealt with in detail in previous chapters. Another aspect of growth that is vital to an organization is the pace at which it grows. As long as a company has easy access to additional shareholders’ funds or borrowed funds, it can increase its assets (and therefore also its sales) almost as rapidly as it likes, provided the demand is large enough. If the company does not want to raise new shareholders’ funds to finance growth, it can use internally generated funds plus an amount of borrowings (limited by the target capital structure). Managers are often reluctant to issue new shares for a number of reasons. The most important reasons are the possibility of a loss of control when new shareholders take up shares, and the fact that new issues are expensive due to flotation costs. Consequently, it is preferable to finance growth from retained 154 University of Pretoria etd – De Wet, J H v H (2004) income as well as an appropriate amount of debt, in order for the target capital structure to remain the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Companies' Sustainable Growth, Accounting Quality, And
    sustainability Article Companies’ Sustainable Growth, Accounting Quality, and Investments Performances. The Case of the Romanian Capital Market Mihai Carp * , Leontina Păvăloaia, Constantin Toma, Iuliana Eugenia Georgescu and Mihai-Bogdan Afrăsinei Department of Accounting, Business Information Systems and Statistics, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, 700506 Iasi, Romania; [email protected] (L.P.); [email protected] (C.T.); [email protected] (I.E.G.); [email protected] (M.-B.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 23 September 2020; Accepted: 19 November 2020; Published: 23 November 2020 Abstract: The paper analyzes the influence of sustainable growth (SGR) as a reflection of the manner of strategic business organization, particularly in the quality of reported financial information (magnitude of discretionary accruals—DAC) as an expression of the ethical attitude adopted by companies in the entity–investor relationship, on the investors’ decisions, substantiated in the performance level of the shares held. Using models consecrated in the literature, the results reflect a significant influence, both in the case of separate testing of the two factors (SGR and DAC), and in the case of the conjugated action thereof, on investment performance. The relations were also tested by introducing certain control variables into the analysis, such as: the intangible ratio, quick ratio, company size, as well as the SGR sensitivity function of the level of information quality. In the case of financial information quality, specific indicators from the two consecrated value relevance testing models by Ohlson (1995) and Easton and Harris (1991) were used as control variables. The obtained results are robust, preserving the sense and intensity of the influences.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), And
    Human Journals Research Article January 2018 Vol.:8, Issue:3 © All rights are reserved by Joana L Saragih The Effects of Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), and Debt to Equity Ratio (DER) on Stock Returns in Wholesale and Retail Trade Companies Listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange Keywords: return on assets, return on equity, debt to equity ratio ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze the effects of Joana L Saragih return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and debt to equity ratio (DER) on stock returns in Wholesale and Retail Trade Companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (ISE). This research Lecturer on Catholic University Santo Thomas, North is useful to broaden the writer's insight and knowledge about the effects of return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and debt Sumatera, Indonesia. to equity ratio (DER) on stock returns in Wholesale and Retail Trade Companies listed in ISE year 2010-2011. Purposive sampling is used Submission: 29 December 2017 as a technique for determining the sample, which for this study consists of 24 companies. The data used are secondary data collected Accepted: 5 January 2018 through documentation technique. In the present study, the data Published: 30 January 2018 collected were analyzed using multiple linear regressions. Based on the results of the discussion it is concluded that the multiple linear regression equation obtained is Y = 0.483 - 0.702X1 + 0.155X2 - 0.090X3 + . It follows that return on assets has a negative effect on stock returns, return on equity has a positive effect on stock returns, and debt to equity ratio has a positive effect on stock returns.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Return on Assets, Return on Equity, Net Profit Margin
    International Journal of Finance Research e-ISSN: 2746-136X. Vol. 1, No. 2, December2020 The Effect of Return on Assets, Return on Equity, Net Profit Margin, Earning per Share, and Operating Profit Margin on Stock Prices of Banking Companies In Indonesia Stock Exchange Choiriyah Choiriya 1, Fatimah Fatimah2, Sri Agustina3, Fithri Atika Ulfa4, 1,2Department of Management, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang, Indonesia 3. Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Rahmaniyah, Sekayu-Musi Banyuasin, Indonesia 4 Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung, Indonesia [email protected] Abstract: This study aims to determine the effect of return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), net profit margin (NPM), earning per share (EPS) and operating profit margin (OPM) on the stock prices of banking companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. This type of research is associative research. Secondary data in this study is in the form of banking financial statements. The total population used in this study were 32 banking companies, and the samples that met the research criteria were eight banking companies listed on IDX. The analytical model used in this study is multiple linear regression analysis. The analysis results show that ROA, ROE, NPM, EPS, and OPM together have a significant effect on the stock prices of banking companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). On the other hand, coefisiens of ROA, NPM and OPM have no significant effect on the stock price of banking companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). In contrast, ROE and EPS significantly affect the stock price of banking companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Keywords: Return on assets; Return On Equity; Net Profit Margin; Earning Per Share; Operating Profit Margin; Stock Price.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Financial Statements Using Ratios Henry J
    Publication CNRE-43P Analysis of Financial Statements Using Ratios Henry J. Quesada, Associate Professor and Extension Specialist, Sustainable Biomaterials 1. Introduction to Financial Management Table of Contents Financial management is a critical internal process for organizations. With today’s challenges and regulations, to the management of every organization (profit or 1. Introduction to nonprofit) needs to have an understanding of the basics of financial management Financial to ensure that the organization is fiscally responsible. The understanding of Management .............1 financial management practices and the construction of basic systems and practices are the foundation for a healthy/sustainable organization. 2. The Balance Sheet .....1 Financial management covers the following aspects: 2.1 Assets ..................1 ■ Financial statement analyses: These include income, balance sheet, and cash flow statements. 2.2 Liabilities ............3 ■ Capital budgeting: These techniques and methods compare different 2.3 Stockholders’ investment alternatives and usually include the analysis of future cash flows Equity .................3 (negative and positive). ■ Taxation. 3. The Income ■ Legal considerations: Organizations might engage in various public activities Statement ..................4 such as lobbying, advocacy, contracts, risk management, and public support. ■ Accounting: Bookkeeping systems require that certain standards are followed 4. The Cash Flow to develop and report financial transactions. Statement ..................5
    [Show full text]
  • Petronet LNG Running out of Gas Phillipcapital (India) Pvt
    Petronet LNG Running out of Gas PhillipCapital (India) Pvt. Ltd OIL & GAS: Company Update 28 July 2014 PLNG’s stock has appreciated ~75% from its lows on account of improved visibility on utilization of Dahej terminal (back‐to‐back contracts for Downgrade to NEUTRAL 14.5MMTPA volumes and likely ONGC contract for replacement of C2‐C3 of PLNG IN | CMP RS 184 ~0.9MMTPA) and correction in spot LNG prices to ~US$11/mmbtu (fell 20% TARGET RS 170 (‐8%) QoQ). While some hold Kochi terminal’s utilization rate could improve following any early resolution of the entangled pipeline, that would evacuate Company Data LNG from Kochi, we highlight with GAIL having already taken a write off, any O/S SHARES (MN) : 750 MARKET CAP (RSBN) : 138 amicable solution could take longer. Besides, our estimates fully captures MARKET CAP (USDBN) : 2.3 medium term upsides with 2/3/4.1 MMTPA in FY17‐19E, this coupled with 52 ‐ WK HI/LO (RS) : 190 / 103 expensive valuations turns risk‐reward unfavorable. We believe the current LIQUIDITY 3M (USDMN) : 5.9 FACE VALUE (RS) : 10 valuations are demanding and factors in all near term positives leaving little room for upside from current levels (EV/CE ~1.5x FY16). Thus, we downgrade Share Holding Pattern, % PROMOTERS : 50.0 our recommendation to ‘NEUTRAL’ from ‘BUY’ with a revised price target of FII / NRI : 32.6 Rs170/share (as we roll forward estimates to FY16 (Rs159/share earlier)). FI / MF : 3.3 NON PROMOTER CORP. HOLDINGS : 1.7 Cut utilization rate for Kochi terminal, tanker leasing unlikely to add PUBLIC & OTHERS : 12.5 significantly to earnings: As GAIL continues to face a host of issues in laying its Price Performance, % natural gas pipeline from Kochi to Mangalore and lack of solution for the same in 1mth 3mth 1yr ABS 1.5 31.1 49.2 the near term in sight, we cut our utilisation rate assumption for the Kochi REL TO BSE ‐1.7 16.0 17.2 terminal.
    [Show full text]
  • Calculating Financial Ratios for Cotton Farmers Amanda Blocker, Gregg Ibendahl, and John Anderson
    Calculating Financial Ratios for Cotton Farmers Amanda Blocker, Gregg Ibendahl, and John Anderson Introduction – Sixteen Farm Financial Ratios is calculated by subtracting total current liabilities from An income statement and balance sheet only partially total current farm assets. explain whether a farm is profitable and is in good fi- nancial standing. While these two financial statements Solvency are extremely important, they are only the starting point Solvency is a measure of the value of assets owned by in analyzing a farm’s financial position. Cotton farmers a farm when compared to the amount of liabilities. Sol- can benefit from the use of financial ratios. These ratios vency answers the question of who owns the farm. Does can help determine how efficient the operation is and can the cotton farmer own more than the lender or vice-versa. help detect problems early before they get out of hand. By measuring solvency, farmers can determine if they Financial ratios basically put the numbers from an income should still operate. Lenders are especially interested in statement and balance sheet into the proper perspective these ratios as they do not want to increase their stake in for analysis. The use of financial ratios allows a farm to the farm operation as time passes. compare itself over time and also allows comparisons to There are three ratios that are calculated to measure sol- other farms in the same year even if these farms are dif- vency. These are debt/asset ratio, equity/asset ratio, and ferent sizes. The sixteen ratios cover the areas of liquidity, debt/equity ratio.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Ratio Cheatsheet Myaccountingcourse.Com
    Financial Ratio Cheatsheet MyAccountingCourse.com PDFPDF Table of contents Liquidity Ratios 3 Solvency Ratios 8 Efficiency Ratios 12 Profitability Ratios 17 Market Prospect Ratios 23 Coverage Ratios 28 CPA Exam Ratios to Know 31 CMA Exam Ratios to Know 32 Thanks for signing up for the MyAccountingcourse.com newletter. This is a quick financial ratio cheatsheet with short explanations, formulas, and analyzes of some of the most common financial ratios. Check out www.myaccountingcourse.com/financial-ratios/ for more ratios, examples, and explanations. Liquidity Ratios Quick Ratio / Acid Test Ratio Current Ratio Working Capital Ratio Times Interest Earned Find more Liquidity Ratios on the myaccountingcourse.com financial ratios page. Copyright © MyAccountingCourse.com | For personal use by the original purchaser only - financial ratio cheatsheet - page 3 Quick Ratio Explanation -The quick ratio or acid test ratio is a liquid- -The quick ratio is often called the acid ity ratio that measures the ability of a com- test ratio in reference to the historical use pany to pay its current liabilities when they of acid to test metals for gold by the early come due with only quick assets. Quick miners. If the metal passed the acid test, it assets are current assets that can be con- was pure gold. If metal failed the acid test verted to cash within 90 days or in the by corroding from the acid, it was a base short-term. Cash, cash equivalents, short- metal and of no value. term investments or marketable securities, and current accounts receivable are con- The acid test of finance shows how well sidered quick assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Finance the Real Economy
    FINANCE AND THE REAL ECONOMY ISSUES AND CASE STUDIES IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES editors: Yilmaz Akyüz Giinther Held United Nations University/World Institute for Development Economics Research Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Responsibility for the papers rest solely with the authors. Collection: Social and Political Studies Inscription N9 88.481 I.S.B.N.: 956 - 7363 - 02 - 1 © S.R.V. Impresos S.A., Tocomal 2052, Santiago - Chile. Printed in Chile Compositor: Patricio Velasco G. Santiago, September 1993 INDEX INDEX INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 11 FINANCIAL LIBERALIZATION: THE KEY ISSUES....................................................... 19 \/ Introduction ....................................................................................................... 23 I. Interest rates and savings................................................................................... 24 II. Financial liberalization and deepening................................................................ 27 III. Allocative efficiency............................................................................................ 30 IV. Productive efficiency and cost of finance............................................................. 35 V. Regulation of finance and financial stability........................................................ 37 VI. Options in financial organizations....................................................................
    [Show full text]