DOCSLIB.ORG

NEAL HOT SPRINGS GEOTHERMAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RIGHT of WAY, PHASE 2 Serial Number OR-66537

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NEAL HOT SPRINGS GEOTHERMAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RIGHT of WAY, PHASE 2 Serial Number OR-66537 NEAL HOT SPRINGS GEOTHERMAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RIGHT OF WAY, PHASE 2 Serial Number OR-66537 Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-OR-V040-2011-008 Prepared by: U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Malheur Resource Area 100 Oregon Street Vale, Oregon 97918 March, 2011 As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interest of all our people. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in Island Territories under U.S. administration. BLM/OR/WA/AE-09/053+1792 NEAL HOT SPRINGS RIGHT OF WAY DOI-BLM-OR-V040-2011-008 Serial Number OR-65701 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 DECISION TO BE MADE ................................................................................................................. 2 1.4 SCOPING AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT .......................................................................................... 3 1.5 RELATIONSHIP TO LAWS, REGULATIONS, POLICIES, AND PLANS................................................. 3 1.6 ISSUES ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ........................................ 6 2.1 PROPOSED ACTION ....................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 ADOPTED ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MEASURES................................................................. 9 2.3 ALTERNATIVE 1 – THE NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE ...................................................................... 9 2.4 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT NOT ANALYZED IN DETAIL .................................................... 9 2.4.1 Directional Drilling ................................................................................................................ 10 2.4.2 Alternate Drill Locations and Additional Access Roads ....................................................... 10 2.5 PLAN CONFORMANCE ................................................................................................................. 10 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ........................................................ 11 3.1 VEGETATION ............................................................................................................................... 11 3.2 NOXIOUS WEEDS ........................................................................................................................ 12 3.3 SPECIAL STATUS PLANTS ........................................................................................................... 12 3.4 MIGRATORY BIRDS ..................................................................................................................... 12 3.5 WILDLIFE AND FISH .................................................................................................................... 13 3.6 LIVESTOCK GRAZING .................................................................................................................. 13 3.7 RECREATION AND VISUAL RESOURCES ...................................................................................... 13 3.8 WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS ....................................................................................................... 14 3.9 CULTURAL RESOURCES .............................................................................................................. 14 3.10 PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................ 14 3.11 AIR AND ATMOSPHERIC QUALITY .............................................................................................. 15 3.12 GEOLOGY .................................................................................................................................... 17 3.13 SOILS ........................................................................................................................................... 18 3.14 HYDROLOGY AND AQUATIC RESOURCES ................................................................................... 18 3.15 COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC VALUES ...................................................................................... 18 3.16 LANDS AND REALTY ................................................................................................................... 19 3.17 CRITICAL ELEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITIES ......................................................... 19 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ................................................................................. 21 4.1 PROPOSED ACTION ..................................................................................................................... 21 4.1.1 Vegetation .............................................................................................................................. 21 4.1.2 Noxious Weeds ...................................................................................................................... 22 4.1.3 Special Status Plants .............................................................................................................. 22 4.1.4 Migratory Birds ..................................................................................................................... 22 4.1.5 Wildlife and Fish ................................................................................................................... 23 i 4.1.6 Livestock Grazing .................................................................................................................. 23 4.1.7 Cultural and Paleontological Resources ................................................................................ 23 4.1.8 Air and Atmospheric Quality ................................................................................................. 23 4.1.9 Soils ....................................................................................................................................... 24 4.1.10 Hydrology and Aquatic Resources ........................................................................................ 25 4.2 THE NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE .................................................................................................. 25 4.2.1 Special Status Plants .............................................................................................................. 26 4.2.2 Rangeland Vegetation ............................................................................................................ 26 4.2.3 Migratory Birds ..................................................................................................................... 26 4.2.4 Wildlife .................................................................................................................................. 26 5 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ANALYSIS ................................................................................... 26 5.1 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ANALYSIS AREA.................................................................................... 27 5.2 PAST AND PRESENT ACTIONS ..................................................................................................... 29 5.3 REASONABLY FORESEEABLE FUTURE ACTIONS......................................................................... 29 5.4 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE ......................................................................................................... 30 5.5 IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES ......................................... 30 6 MITIGATION ............................................................................................................................ 30 7 MONITORING .......................................................................................................................... 32 8 COORDINATION AND CONSULTATION ............................................................................ 33 8.1 LIST OF PREPARERS .................................................................................................................... 33 8.2 LIST OF AGENCIES, ORGANIZATIONS, AND PERSONS NOTIFIED ................................................. 33 9 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................... 34 LIST OF TABLES PAGE Table 1 Critical Elements of the Human Environment ............................................................................... 20 Table 2 Resource Values ...........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Preliminary Plan of Development
    Preliminary Plan of Development June 2010 Boardman to Hemingway Transmission Line Project Prepared By: Idaho Power Company 1221 West Idaho Street Boise, ID 83702 Preliminary Plan of Development Boardman to Hemingway Transmission Line Project Prepared By Idaho Power Company 1221 West Idaho Street Boise, ID 83702 June 2010 Preliminary Plan of Development Boardman to Hemingway Transmission Line Project Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Background ..............................................................................................................1-2 2 PURPOSE AND NEED .....................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Project Proponent – Idaho Power ............................................................................2-1 2.2 Why is Idaho Power Proposing the B2H Project? ....................................................2-1 2.2.1 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Requirements ..............................2-1 2.2.2 Idaho and Oregon Public Utility Commission Requirements........................2-2 2.2.3 Regional Planning Studies Identify the Need for B2H ..................................2-3 2.2.4 B2H Will Add Necessary Capacity and Improve Reliability ..........................2-4 2.3 The B2H Transmission Line Addresses Identified Needs........................................2-6 3 PROPOSED FACILITIES..................................................................................................3-1
    [Show full text]
  • Snake River Flow Augmentation Impact Analysis Appendix
    SNAKE RIVER FLOW AUGMENTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS APPENDIX Prepared for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Walla Walla District’s Lower Snake River Juvenile Salmon Migration Feasibility Study and Environmental Impact Statement United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Boise, Idaho February 1999 Acronyms and Abbreviations (Includes some common acronyms and abbreviations that may not appear in this document) 1427i A scenario in this analysis that provides up to 1,427,000 acre-feet of flow augmentation with large drawdown of Reclamation reservoirs. 1427r A scenario in this analysis that provides up to 1,427,000 acre-feet of flow augmentation with reservoir elevations maintained near current levels. BA Biological assessment BEA Bureau of Economic Analysis (U.S. Department of Commerce) BETTER Box Exchange Transport Temperature Ecology Reservoir (a water quality model) BIA Bureau of Indian Affairs BID Burley Irrigation District BIOP Biological opinion BLM Bureau of Land Management B.P. Before present BPA Bonneville Power Administration CES Conservation Extension Service cfs Cubic feet per second Corps U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CRFMP Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program CRP Conservation Reserve Program CVPIA Central Valley Project Improvement Act CWA Clean Water Act DO Dissolved Oxygen Acronyms and Abbreviations (Includes some common acronyms and abbreviations that may not appear in this document) DREW Drawdown Regional Economic Workgroup DDT Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane EIS Environmental Impact Statement EP Effective Precipitation EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act ETAW Evapotranspiration of Applied Water FCRPS Federal Columbia River Power System FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FIRE Finance, investment, and real estate HCNRA Hells Canyon National Recreation Area HUC Hydrologic unit code I.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Malheur River Basin TMDL and WQMP
    Water Quality Report Malheur River Basin Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) and Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) September 2010 Last Updated: 09/2010 DEQ 10-WQ-023 This report prepared by: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 811 SW 6th Avenue Portland, OR 97204 1-800-452-4011 www.oregon.gov/deq Primary Authors: John Dadoly and Ryan Michie For more information contact: John Dadoly, Basin Coordinator 700 SE Emigrant Avenue, Suite 330 Pendleton, OR 97801 (541) 278-4616 [email protected] Cheryll Hutchens-Woods, Water Quality Manager Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 700 SE Emigrant Avenue, Suite 330 Pendleton, OR 97801 (541) 278-4619 [email protected] Eugene Foster, Manager of Watershed Management Section Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 811 SW 6th Avenue Portland, OR 97204 (503) 229-5325 [email protected] Malheur River Basin TMDL September 2010 Table of Contents Executive Summary Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 Scope of TMDL Chapter 3 Basin Assessment Chapter 4 Pollutant Sources Chapter 5 Summary of Current and Past Pollution Control Efforts Chapter 6 Dissolved Oxygen, Chlorophyll a, pH, and Phosphorus Chapter 7 Bacteria Chapter 8 Pesticides Chapter 9 Temperature Water Quality Management Plan Appendix A Bacteria TMDL Technical Information Appendix B Temperature TMDL Technical Data Appendix C Baseline Beneficial Use Status of the Malheur River Basin Appendix D Quality Assurance Project Plan/Sample & Analysis Plan: Malheur River Basin TMDL Nutrient Water Quality Study
    [Show full text]
  • The Vale Rangeland Rehabilitation Program: the Desert Repaired in Southeastern Oregon
    Harold F. Heady is Professor of Range Management and James Bartolome is Lecturer in Range Management at the Department of Forestry and Conservation, University of California, Berkeley. Acknowledgments This study was principally funded by the United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. The objectives of the study were developed jointly by the Bureau of Land Management, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, and the authors. The authors wish to express their appreciation to personnel of both the Vale, Oregon, District and others in the Bureau of Land Management and to the Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. Many persons in both organizations enthusiastically contributed to this study. This report will be used as a case study in the United Nations Environment Program on Desertification. This publication reports research involving pesticides. It does not contain recommendations for their use, nor does it imply that the uses discussed here have been registered. All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate State and/or Federal agencies before they can be recommended. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish or other wildlife-- if they are not handled or applied properly. Use all pesticides selectively and carefully. Follow recommended practices for the disposal of surplus pesticides and pesticide containers. Mention of products by name does not constitute and endorsement by the U.S. Department of the Interior or the U.S. Department of Agriculture. THE VALE RANGELAND REHABILITATION PROGRAM: THE DESERT REPAIRED IN SOUTHEASTERN OREGON Reference Abstract Heady, Harold F., and James Bartolome.
    [Show full text]
  • OB 26.2 2000 Summer
    Or Vol. 26, No. 2, Summere 2000gon The quarterlyBirds journal of Oregon field ornithology The Flesh-footed Shearwater (Puffinus carneipes) in Oregon ......................................................... 150 Greg Gillson The value of the short note in ornithological liter- ature ................................................................. 154 Dave Irons First Northern Mockingbird nest for Oregon ... 155 Fred Zeillemaker An inland June record of Pomarine Jaeger ...... 157 Michael Hammar An at-sea observation of a dark-morph Wedge- tailed Shearwater (Puffinus pacificus) in Oregon waters ............................................................... 158 Matthew Hunter An unusual Cassin’s Finch (Carpodacus cassini) from Cabin Lake Ranger Station, Lake County, Oregon ............................................................. 160 Stephen Dowlan Marion County’s first record for Sage Sparrow ............................................................ 162 Stephen Dowlan An American Crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos) with a broken maxilla from Waldport, Lincoln County, Oregon................................................ 162 Stephen Dowlan An albinistic Oregon (Dark-eyed) Junco from West Salem, Polk County, Oregon .................. 163 Stephen Dowlan Birding Oregon Canyon, Oregon Canyon Moun- tains, Malheur County, Oregon ........................ 164 Mike Denny FIELD NOTES: Eastern Oregon, Fall 1999 .... 167 Paul Sullivan FIELD NOTES: Western Oregon, Fall 1999 ... 172 Jeff Gilligan Announcements ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Bull Trout Final\WPD Final\Chapter 14 Malheur Recovery Unit, Oregon
    Chapter: 14 State(s): Oregon Recovery Unit Name: Malheur Recovery Unit Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed necessary to recover and protect listed species. Plans are prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and in this case, with the assistance of recovery unit teams, State and Tribal agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Director or Regional Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature Citation: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Chapter 14, Malheur Recovery Unit, Oregon. 71 p. In: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Draft Recovery Plan. Portland, Oregon. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Members of the Malheur Recovery Unit Team who assisted in the preparation of this chapter include: Wayne Bowers, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Jason Fenton, Burns Paiute Tribe Tom Friedrichsen, U. S. Forest Service, Burns Ranger District Dan Gonzalez, Burns Paiute Tribe Gina Lampman, Bureau of Land Management Sam Lohr, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Boardman to Hemingway Transmission Line
    Notice of Intent to Apply for a Site Certificate for the Boardman to Hemingway Transmission Line July 2010 Boardman to Hemingway Transmission Line Project Submitted to: Oregon Department of Energy Prepared By: Idaho Power Company 1221 West Idaho Street Boise, ID 83702 Notice of Intent To Apply For a Site Certificate For The Boardman to Hemingway Transmission Line Submitted to: Oregon Department of Energy Prepared by: Idaho Power Company 1221 West Idaho Street Boise, ID 83702 July 2010 This page intentionally left blank. Idaho Power Company Notice of Intent to Apply for Site Certificate Boardman to Hemingway Transmission Line TABLE OF CONTENTS EXHIBIT A APPLICANT INFORMATION.............................................................. A-1 EXHIBIT B PROJECT DESCRIPTION.................................................................. B-4 EXHIBIT C PROJECT LOCATION......................................................................... C-1 EXHIBIT D CORRIDOR SELECTION .................................................................... D-1 EXHIBIT E APPLICABLE PERMITS ......................................................................E-1 EXHIBIT F PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION .........................................F-1 EXHIBIT G PROJECT MAPS ................................................................................. G-1 EXHIBIT H NON-GENERATING FACILITY ........................................................... H-1 EXHIBIT I LAND USE STANDARD........................................................................ I-1 EXHIBIT
    [Show full text]
  • US Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Opinion
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Opinion for Bureau of Reclamation Operations and Maintenance in the Snake River Basin Above Brownlee Reservoir U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Snake River Fish and Wildlife Office Boise, Idaho March 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction............................................................................................................1 I. Introduction..............................................................................................................1 II. Background..............................................................................................................2 A. Project Authorizations....................................................................................2 B. Hydrologic Seasons and Operations ...............................................................5 C. Snake River Basin Adjudication.....................................................................5 D. Flow Augmentation for Salmon......................................................................6 III. Consultation History................................................................................................9 IV. Concurrence ...........................................................................................................12 V. Climate...................................................................................................................13 VI. Reinitiation Notice.................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • OB 23.3 1997 Fall
    The quarterly journal of Oregon field ornithology Volume 23, Number 3, Fall 1997 Gabrielson and Jewett: Who Were They? 87 David B. Marshall The Records of the Oregon Bird Records Committee, 1996-1997 92 §§§§§. Harry Nehls In Search of a Smith's Longspur 97 Barrel Faxon Rogue River Ospreys 98 John C. Blithe Colin P. Dillingham Observation of a Red-tailed Hawk/Prairie Falcon Combat 102 James A. Hewkin IK VST *v /<•4 ^v; More Unusual Raptor Behavior Near A Nesting Site 102 m i Kathleen T. Martin W ^ WmZ > I Seasick Remedy IV 103 Greg Gillson NEWS AND NOTES OB 23(3) 103 FIELDNOTES 106 Eastern Oregon, Winter 1996-97 107 Ray Korpi Western Oregon, Winter 1996-97 HO Jim Johnson COVER PHOTO Snowy Owl, 7 December 1996, Bayocean sandspit, Tillamook Co. Photo/Skip Russell. CENTER OFO Membership form • OFO Bookcase • OFO Birding Weekends • Oregon Rare Bird Phone Network • Fall Shorebird Festival • Checklist of Oregon's birds Oregon Birds is looking for Oregon Birds material in these categories: News Briefs on things of temporal The quarterly journal of Oregon field ornithology importance, such as meetings, birding trips, announcements, news items, etc. OREGON BIRDS is a quarterly publication of Oregon FieldArticle s are longer contributions dealing Ornithologists, an Oregon not-for-profit corporation. Membership in with identification, distribution, ecology, Oregon Field Ornithologists includes a subscription to Oregon Birds. management, conservation, taxonomy, ISSN 0890-2313 behavior, biology, and historical aspects of ornithology and birding in Oregon. Articles Editor Owen Schmidt cite references (if any) at the end of the text. Assistant Editor Sharon K.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconnaissance Investigation of Water Quality, Bottom Sediment
    Reconnaissance Investigation of Water Quality, Bottom Sediment,and Biota associated with Irrigation Drainage in the Owyhee and Vale Projects, Oregon and Idaho, 1990-91 By Frank A. Rinella, U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, William H. Mullins, U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, and Carol A. Schuler, U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 93-4156 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, and | BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS I Portland, Oregon 1994 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GORDON P. EATON, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey District Chief Earth Science Information Center U.S. Geological Survey, WRD Open-File Reports Section 10615 S.E. Cherry Blossom Drive Box25286, MS 517 Portland, Oregon 97216 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................... Introduction....................................................................................................^^ Purpose and Scope.............................................................................................................................................................4 Acknowledgments..................................................^
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit T, Recreational Opportunities Identified in (A)
    Exhibit T Recreation Boardman to Hemingway Transmission Line Project 1221 West Idaho Street Boise, Idaho 83702 Mark Stokes, Project Leader Zach Funkhouser, Permitting (208) 388-2483 (208) 388-5375 [email protected] [email protected] Amended Preliminary Application for Site Certificate June 2017 Boardman to Hemingway Transmission Line Project Exhibit T TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. T-1 2.0 APPLICABLE RULES AND STATUTES .......................................................................... T-1 2.1 General Standards for Siting Facilities .................................................................... T-1 2.2 Site Certificate Application Requirements ............................................................... T-1 2.3 Amended Project Order Provisions ......................................................................... T-2 3.0 ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................ T-2 3.1 Analysis Area .......................................................................................................... T-2 3.2 Methods ................................................................................................................... T-3 3.2.1 Inventory Methods .................................................................................... T-3 3.2.2 Impacts Analysis Methods .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Big Day Record FIELDNSTES ...Western Oregon, Spring 1997
    Tbe quarterly journal of Oregon ft.eld. ornitltology Volume 23, Number 4,I[inter 1997 Gabrielson andJewefi Who Were They? Part II ,.......115 Dauid B. Marshall The Growth of the Oregon Birdlist, 1!06 through 1995 "..... 120 George A. Jobanek A New North American Waterfowl Big Day Record ...............134 Jeff Gilligan, Jim Johruon, Gaard Lillie, Owen Schmidt 0F0 Birding Weekends 136-37 Malheur County, May 17-18, 1997 ......,.............'.'..... 136 Paul Sulliuan Jackon County, 19-20 July 1997 .......................'.'..... 136 Paul T, Sulliuan Lake County, 15-17 Au gust 1997 ......'.........'.............. 137 Daui.d R. CoPeland Announcing 1998 0F0 Birding Weekends ................ 142 Paul Sulliuan Getting the most out of your CBC day '....".""'.,. 13S Alan ContrsYas NEWSAND NorES OBz3u) .................r42 FIELDNSTES .................. .....144 Eastern0regon, Spring 1997 ........... ......145 Paul T. Sulliaan Western Oregon, Spring 1997 ....'...... ".. 150 GeYard Lillie COVER PHOTO Willet,30 May 1997, near Hina, Harney Co' Photo/ Skip Rwsell. CENTER 0F0 Mernbershipform ' 0F0 Boohcase ' 0F0 BirttingWeekmis ' OreSon Rare Bird Phone Network . Checklist of Oregon's birds ' Oregon's Cbristmas Bird Counts Oregon Birds is looking for Bfufu material in these categories: The quarterly Joumal of Oregon fteld omltbologit News Briefs on things of temporal importance, such as meetings, birding trips. announcements, news items, etc. OREGON BIRDS is a quarterly publication of oregon Field Articles are longer contributions dealing Ornithologists, an Oregon not-for-profit corporation. Membership in with identification, distribution, ecology, Oregon Field Ornithologists includes a subscription lo Oregon Birds. management, conservatiott, taxonomy, lssN 0890-2313 behavior, biology, and historical aspects of ornithology and birding in 0regon. tuticles Editor Owen Schmidt cite references (if any) al the end of the text.
    [Show full text]