Cultural Impact Assessment Report Ruakura Estate
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT RUAKURA ESTATE Prepared by: Director - Maree Pene On behalf of: Te Kotuku Whenua Consultancy The Environmental Agency for Ngati Wairere This is the work for: Tainui Group Holdings Date: October 2011 Status: Final This document and its content is the property of Waikato Tainui and Te Kotuku Whenua Consultancy. Any unauthorised employment or reproduction, in full or part is forbidden Tauhei Marae – Tauhei Hukanui Marae – Gordonton Maramatutahi is the name of this wharenui. Tuturuapapa is the name of this wharenui. Hukanui Kingi Koroki spent considerable amount of is one of the oldest Marae in the Waikato at nearly leisure time here in the early 1930-40’s, 110 years old. Kingi Tawhio lay in state here before mingling with the Kaumatua. his journey to Turangawaewae in 1894. The 100th The wharenui was built in the 1990’s with anniversary of Kingi Tawhiao was in 1994. Hukanui building materials donated by the late Mr Te Marae celebrated their 100 year Poukai in 1998. Hou Pene and the late Mr Desmond Hopa. Ruakura Estate Cultural Impact Assessment – Page 1 of 22 Executive Summary Tainui Group Holdings Limited & Chedworth Park Limited (TGH & CPL) has contracted Te Kotuku Whenua Consultancy (TKW) to develop a Cultural Impact Assessment Report (CIA) for the purposes of the preparation of a Ruakura Structure Plan and the framework for proposed development activities at Ruakura, Hamilton. The CIA report contains the respective views and recommendations from consultation with Tangata Whenua and Ngaati Wairere documentation that has been developed by TKW by its director Maree Pene. TKW is the mandated Environmental Agency for Ngati Wairere. TGH & CPL is planning various developments at Ruakura including an inland port and associated activities, warehousing, commercial developments, and residential opportunities. These activities have been incorporated into various regional and district planning instruments such as the Regional Policy Statement, Hamilton City Council District Plan, Future Proof, Hamilton Urban Growth Strategy and Regional Land Transport Strategy. More particularly TGH & CPL is currently assisting the Hamilton City Council with its proposed District Plan, specifically with the Ruakura Structure Plan. This CIA report will be included within the Ruakura Structure Plan and recommends the following mitigations: 1. An archaeologist be present during excavations of the site of the proposed development; 2. A reserve is created for the protection of places, objects, and natural features of historic, archaeological, cultural, educational and other interests; 3. In the discovery of koiwi (human bones) contractors must immediately notify Ngati Wairere and Ngati Haua representative(s) and all earthworks must cease until such time as customary protocols for clearance and protection of the area has been undertaken; 4. Mitigation measures are implemented prior to commencement of construction to minimize adverse effects from sedimentation to surrounding water bodies; 5. In the discovery of taonga excavations must cease and Ngati Wairere and Ngati Haua representatives(s) must be notified immediately to enable appropriate protocols can be put in place to ensure the protection of these Taonga; 6. Recommend that as part of the development proposals there may be scope to protect and generate significant areas for restorative and regenerative vegetation; and 7. The protection of inland waterways and associated ecosystems. It is acknowledge that Ruakura will be developed in a staged process as outlined in the Future Proof land allocation strategy submitted as part of the Proposed Regional Policy Statement. The mitigations recommended are intended to satisfy cultural and environmental matters of the development. Ruakura Estate Cultural Impact Assessment – Page 2 of 22 It is also acknowledge that communication of progress and monitoring of the recommendations by TGH & CPL will be coordinated through the Office of the Maori King, Te Arataura and Waikato- Tainui Te Kauhanganui Incorporated as the tribal mandated authority. TKW fully endorses the approach and context of the development as promoted by TGH & CPL. Ruakura Estate Cultural Impact Assessment – Page 3 of 22 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 WHAT IS A CULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT ..................................................................................................... 6 1.3 OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.4 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ......................................................................................................................................... 7 1.5 METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.0 WAIKATO-TAINUI ............................................................................................................................................ 8 2.1 WAIKATO-TAINUI IWI ............................................................................................................................................. 8 2.2 TRIBAL GOVERNING STRUCTURE................................................................................................................................ 9 3.0 PLANNING FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................................................ 9 3.1 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 ........................................................................................................................ 9 3.2 WAIKATO-TAINUI RAUPATU CLAIMS ........................................................................................................................ 10 3.3 WAIKATO RAUPATU LANDS SETTLEMENT ACT ............................................................................................................ 10 3.4 WAIKATO-TAINUI WAIKATO RIVER ACT 2010 ........................................................................................................... 11 3.5 WHAKATUPURANGA WAIKATO-TAINUI 2050 ........................................................................................................... 12 3.6 HISTORIC PLACES ACT 1993 .................................................................................................................................. 12 3.7 PROTECTED OBJECTS ACT 1975.............................................................................................................................. 13 3.8 FUTURE PROOF .................................................................................................................................................... 13 4.0 WAIKATO-TAINUI VALUES ASSOCIATED WITH RUAKURA .............................................................................. 14 4.1 MANA WHAKAHAERE ........................................................................................................................................... 14 4.2 WAIKATO IWI CUSTOMARY USE AND VALUES ............................................................................................................ 14 4.3 KAITIAKITANGA .................................................................................................................................................... 15 4.4 LAND ................................................................................................................................................................. 15 4.5 WATER .............................................................................................................................................................. 16 4.6 AIR .................................................................................................................................................................... 16 5.0 SCHEDULE OF SIGNIFICANT CULTURAL FEATURES IN RUAKURA .................................................................... 17 5.1 ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................................................................... 17 6.0 KEY ISSUES .................................................................................................................................................... 17 6.1 IWI, HAPU, WHANAU PERCEPTIONS OF THE PROPOSED PLAN CHANGE ........................................................................... 17 6.2 RECOGNITION OF TANGATA WHENUA PHILOSOPHIES .................................................................................................. 17 6.3 CULTURAL LANDSCAPES ......................................................................................................................................... 17 6.4 MAHINGA KAI ..................................................................................................................................................... 18 7.0 REVIEW OF PROPOSED PLAN CHANGE .......................................................................................................... 18 7.1 GENERAL ...........................................................................................................................................................