DOCSLIB.ORG

Report Northern Ireland Assembly Commissioner for Standards Basil

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report Northern Ireland Assembly Commissioner for Standards Basil Report by the Northern Ireland Assembly Commissioner for Standards on complaints against Basil McCrea MLA ASSEMBLY CONFIDENTIAL (until published by order of the Committee on Standards and Privileges) ASSEMBLY CONFIDENTIAL (until published by order of the Committee on Standards and Privileges) CONTENTS Page Background 1 Ashleigh Murray’s failure to attend for interview 2 The Complaints 5 The Investigation 7 Complaint 1 – Obtaining cash by deception from OCE 8 Complaint 2 – Misuse of Assembly stationery 11 Complaint 3 – Attempt to obtain cash by deception from OCE 15 Complaint 4 – Use of media to blacken Miss Murray’s name 19 Complaint 5 – Taking and possession of voyeuristic photographs 23 Complaint 6 – Sexual misconduct towards Jacquelyn Neglia 29 Complaint 7 – Bullying and harassment of Jacquelyn Neglia 33 Complaint 8 – Misconduct towards Alan Patterson 40 Complaint 9 – Sexual misconduct towards Ashleigh Murray 48 Complaint 10 – Misconduct towards Karen Tabahe 58 Complaint 11 – Misconduct towards Nigel Macauley 63 Complaint 12 – Bullying and harassment of Ashleigh Murray 66 Conspiracy 79 Recommendations 80 Summary 81 Annex A Code provisions 82 Annex B Documents 84 ASSEMBLY CONFIDENTIAL (until published by order of the Committee on Standards and Privileges) ASSEMBLY CONFIDENTIAL (until published by order of the Committee on Standards and Privileges) Background On 10 July 2014 I received a document containing a number of complaints against Basil McCrea MLA from John McCallister MLA.1 2 These complaints did not meet the admissibility criteria set out in paragraph 3.2 of the General Procedures Direction.3 Following the receipt of further information, I decided on 12 August 2014 that the complaints were admissible. That day I wrote to Mr McCrea, Mr McCallister and your Clerk advising them that I had commenced my investigation into them. On 17 July 2014 I received an email with two attachments from Alan Patterson.4 The first attachment set out a number of complaints against Basil McCrea.5 The second attachment set out a text exchange between Mr Patterson and Mr McCrea on 24 July 2013.6 As these complaints did not meet the admissibility criteria I required Mr Patterson to furnish me with further information which he did on 6 August 2014.7 On 14 August I wrote to Mr McCrea, Mr Patterson and your Clerk advising them that I had commenced my investigation into these complaints. On 8 August 2014 I received a letter from solicitors acting for Ashleigh Murray together with a document described as her ’Statement of Complaint’ which contained a number of complaints against Mr McCrea.8 These complaints did not meet the admissibility criteria. Further information, which I was satisfied rendered the complaints admissible, was received on 1 September and four 1 Counsel has advised that when a document contains a number of allegations of misconduct each should be treated as a separate complaint. Accordingly, although Mr McCallister, Mr Patterson and Ms Murray each submitted a single complaint document each of the numerous allegations of misconduct contained in each of them has been dealt with as a separate complaint. 2 Document JMcC1 3 Assembly Members (Independent Financial Review and Standards) Act (Northern Ireland) 2011 (General Procedures) Direction 2012 4 Document AP1 5 Document AP2 6 Document AP3 7 Documents AP4-15 8 Documents AM1 & AM2 1 days later I wrote to Mr McCrea, Ms Murray’s solicitors and your Clerk advising them that I had commenced my investigation into them. The provisions of the Code most relevant to this investigation are at Annex A. Copies of the complaint documents, the material provided in support of them and all other material used in reaching my decisions are at Annex B. Documents JMcC3 to JMcC9, DB25 to DB27 and DB 48 were redacted prior to being submitted to me. I have redacted other documents by deleting personal contact and bank details. Ashleigh Murray’s failure to attend for interview To mitigate the risk that the ill-informed and inaccurate comments made by Mr could prejudice readers of this report I pause to set out the facts concerning Ashleigh Murray’s failure to attend for further interview. Miss Murray attended for interview on 13 November 2014. The interview was conducted in the presence of her female solicitor. That interview did not deal with Miss Murray’s allegations of sexual misconduct by Mr McCrea towards her. Although Miss Murray understandably found it distressing when her credibility was challenged her solicitor made no complaint, either then or thereafter, about the way in which her client had been treated. At the end of the interview I told Miss Murray that I would have to meet with her again to deal with other allegations she had made.10 On 15 January 2015 I wrote to Miss Murray’s solicitors informing them that I was now ready to interview their client on a range of further allegations including her allegations of sexually inappropriate behaviour by Mr McCrea and 11 her employment history prior to starting work as a volunteer for Mr McCrea. 10 Document DB14 11 Document DB15 2 No response was received for seven weeks until, on 5 March, I received a letter from her solicitors enclosing a report from her GP in relation to her ongoing medical condition.12 That report was dated 29 January 2015 and stated that Miss Murray was suffering from ‘severe stress’. It went on to say . She has been called for a hearing of the Standards and Privileges Committee. She has found the process very traumatic and does not feel fit to attend. Givenhow (sic) this process has affected her perhap (sic) she could be exclused (sic) from giving further evidence.’13 It is plain that in giving his report the GP had proceeded on the erroneous basis, presumably as a result of what Miss Murray told him, that she had been interviewed by the Standards and Privileges Committee and that she was being asked again to appear before that Committee. It should be noted that the GP did not state that she was unfit to attend for interview even by the Committee but simply asked if she could be excused attendance. Despite these matters and the fact that the report was based on Miss Murray’s condition at least four weeks earlier I was content meantime not to proceed with her interview. On 5 March 2015 I wrote to her solicitors advising them of my decision.14 No acknowledgement was received. As I had heard nothing from her solicitors I wrote to them again on 2 April 2015 pointing out the need to progress my investigation and asking for a medical certificate giving an indication of when their client was likely to be able to attend for interview.15 I drew attention to the note prepared by the Crown Prosecution Service on the issuing of medical certificates and suggested that they should draw it to the attention of Miss Murray’s GP or whoever else was going to examine her for the purpose of the cerificate. Whilst, of course, the CPS has no role in Northern Ireland, I considered that the note was a useful 12 Document DB16 13 Document DB17 14 Document DB18 15 Document DB19 3 summary of what it was reasonable to expect in any medical certificate that was to be provided to the effect that Miss Murray was unfit to be interviewed. I advised Miss Murray’s solicitors that unless such an appropriate medical certificate was provided by 14 May 2015 it was likely that I would ‘proceed with my investigation without further correspondence.’ No response was received to that letter. I am not satisfied that Miss Murray was in fact unfit to attend for further interview. No medical report to that effect has ever been provided to me. It was clear that the powers conferred on me by the Act16 did not permit me to require Miss Murray to submit to an examination by a medical practitioner. It was also clear that service of a Notice requiring her attendance would not secure her evidence. In these circumstances I reluctantly concluded that it was necessary to proceed without the benefit of Miss Murray’s further evidence. Rather than illness I suspect that the true reason for Miss Murray’s unwillingness to attend for further interview was simply that she had come to realise that what she said would not be accepted without question. She knew that some of the evidence she had already given was not credible and that she would, at any further interview be asked to account for the differing accounts she had given of a number of the alleged acts of misconduct, to explain further why she had delayed making any complaints for more than a year and about why she had not disclosed her previous employment history. She must have known that she would be asked why she had failed to tell Mr McCrea that she had, on Further she must have known that she would be asked about why she had not told Mr McCrea that 16 Assembly Members (Independent Financial Review and Standards) Act (Northern Ireland) 2011 Part 2 4 Contrary to what was said by under the protection of privilege, it is quite untrue that Miss Murray was ‘so traumatised by the Commissioner that she had to walk out of the interview’ and ‘cannot give evidence again because of the way in which she was stressed and traumatised.’ In the course of her interview on 13 November 2013 Miss Murray left the interview room for two minutes along with her solicitor so that they could speak in private.20 After she returned to the room the interview continued for a further 43 minutes.21 At the end of the interview Miss Murray left along with her solicitor.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Get Involved the Work of the Northern Ireland Assembly
    Get Involved The work of the Northern Ireland Assembly Pól Callaghan MLA, Tom Elliott MLA, Gregory Campbell MP MLA and Martina Anderson MLA answer questions on local issues at Magee. Contents We welcome your feedback This first edition of the community We welcome your feedback on the newsletter features our recent Community Outreach programme conference at Magee and a number and on this newsletter. Please let of events in Parliament Buildings. us know what you think by emailing It is a snapshot of the Community [email protected] or by Outreach Programme in the Assembly. calling 028 9052 1785 028 9052 1785 Get Involved [email protected] Get Involved The work of the Northern Ireland Assembly Speaker’s overwhelmingly positive. I was deeply impressed by Introduction how passionately those who attended articulated Representative democracy the interests of their own through civic participation causes and communities. I have spoken to many As Speaker, I have always individuals and I am been very clear that greatly encouraged genuine engagement constituency. The event that they intend to get with the community is at Magee was the first more involved with the essential to the success time we had tried such Assembly as a result. of the Assembly as an a specific approach with effective democratic MLAs giving support and The Community Outreach institution. We know advice to community unit is available to that the decisions and groups including on how support, advise and liaise legislation passed in the to get involved with the with the community and Assembly are best when process of developing voluntary sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Constructions of a Cross-Community Identity in a Divided Society
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Political constructions of a cross-community identity in a divided society Citation for published version: McNicholl, K 2017, 'Political constructions of a cross-community identity in a divided society: How politicians articulate Northern Irishness', National Identities, pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2017.1312325 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1080/14608944.2017.1312325 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: National Identities Publisher Rights Statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in National Identities on 27 Apr 2017, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14608944.2017.1312325. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 27. Sep. 2021 Political Constructions of a Cross-Community Identity in a Divided Society: How Politicians Articulate Northern Irishness. A shared identity has been shown to reduce prejudice between conflicting social groups. One such common national category is the ‘Northern Irish’ identity which can be inclusive of both Catholics and Protestants.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of European and National Election Results 2014-2019 Mid-Term January 2017
    Review of European and National Election Results 2014-2019 Mid-term January 2017 STUDY Public Opinion Monitoring Series Directorate-General for Communication Published by EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Author: Jacques Nancy, Public Opinion Monitoring Unit PE 599.242 Directorate-General for Communication Public Opinion Monitoring Unit REVIEW EE2014 Edition Spéciale Mi-Législature Special Edition on Mid-term Legislature LES ÉLECTIONS EUROPÉENNES ET NATIONALES EN CHIFFRES EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL ELECTIONS RESULTS TABLES Mise à jour – 20 janvier 2017 Update – 20th January 2017 8éme Législature 8th Parliamentary Term DANS CETTE EDITION Page IN THIS EDITION Page EDITORIAL11 EDITORIAL I.COMPOSITION DU PARLEMENT EUROPÉEN 6 I. COMPOSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 6 A.REPARTITION DES SIEGES 7 A.DISTRIBUTION OF SEATS 7 B.COMPOSITION DU PARLEMENT 8 B.COMPOSITION OF THE PARLIAMENT 8 -9-9AU 01/07/2014 ON THE 01/07/2014 -10-10AU 20/01/2017 ON THE 20/01/2017 C.SESSIONS CONSTITUTIVES ET PARLEMENT 11 C.CONSTITUTIVE SESSIONS AND OUTGOING EP 11 SORTANT DEPUIS 1979 SINCE 1979 D.REPARTITION FEMMES - HOMMES 29 D.PROPORTION OF WOMEN AND MEN 29 AU 20/01/2017 ON 20/01/2017 -30-30PAR GROUPE POLITIQUE AU 20/01/2017 IN THE POLITICAL GROUPS ON 20/01/2017 ET DEPUIS 1979 AND SINCE 1979 E.PARLEMENTAIRES RÉÉLUS 33 E.RE-ELECTED MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT 33 II.NOMBRE DE PARTIS NATIONAUX AU PARLEMENT 35 II.NUMBER OF NATIONAL PARTIES IN THE EUROPEAN 35 EUROPEEN AU 20/01/2017 PARLIAMENT ON 20/01/2017 III.TAUX DE PARTICIPATION 37 III. TURNOUT 37 -38-38TAUX DE PARTICIPATION
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnicising Ulster's Protestants
    Ethnicising Ulster’s Protestants Tolerance, Peoplehood, and Class in Ulster-Scots Ethnopedagogy Peter Robert Gardner Jesus College, The University of Cambridge This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Contents Figures and Tables iv Abbreviations and Short Forms v Acknowledgements vi Word Limit and Plagiarism Statement vii Abstract viii Chapter One: Introduction 1 1.1 Research Questions, Methods and Chapter Overview 5 1.2 Tolerance, Peoplehood, Dignity 7 Chapter Two: Protestantism, Unionism and Consociational Ideology 11 2.1 Shifting Peoplehoods 12 2.1.1 From British Rule to Unionist Rule 12 2.1.2 From Multiplicity toward Britishness 15 2.1.3 Defeatism and the Cultural Turn 18 2.2 Consociationalism, Normativity, Power 21 2.3 Ulster-Scots 26 2.3.1 Ethnic Peoplehood 26 2.3.2 Who are the Ulster-Scots? 30 2.3.3 “Revival” 35 2.4 Conclusion 38 Chapter Three: Communal Segregation and Educational Peace-Building 39 3.1 The Current State of Segregation 39 3.2 Segregated Education 45 3.3 Education and Peace-Building 55 3.4 Conclusion: De-segregating the Mind 63 Chapter Four: Methods 65 4.1 Research Design and Methods 65 4.1.1 Educational Materials 66 4.1.2 Interviews 67 4.1.3. Primary School Survey 69 4.2 Analysis 70 4.2.1 Euphemism, “Telling” and Reading Silences 72 4.2.2 Reflexivity, Stickiness and Power Dynamics 75 4.3 Conclusion 78 Chapter Five: The Development of Ulster-Scots Education 79 5.1 Processes of Peoplehood-Building 79 5.2 Three Phases of Development 81 5.2.1 Phase One: Grass-Roots Education, Elite Lobbying
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion and Same-Sex Marriage: How Are Non-Sectarian Controversial Issues Discussed in Northern Irish Politics?
    Abortion and same-sex marriage: how are non-sectarian controversial issues discussed in Northern Irish politics? Abortion and same-sex marriage: how are non-sectarian controversial issues discussed in Northern Irish politics? Westminster's legislation regarding marriage rights for same sex couples has not be extended to Northern Ireland. Similarly, Northern Ireland has never been under the jurisdiction of the 1967 Abortion Act, making abortion effectively illegal in the province unless it is necessary to preserve the long-term life or health of the woman. This article considers contemporary political debate around abortion and same-sex marriage in Northern Ireland to ask; how are controversial (but non-sectarian) issues such as abortion and same sex marriage dealt with in a divided society? Using data from the Northern Ireland Life and Times Survey and selected debates from the Northern Irish Assembly, it considers how political parties and post-conflict governance have shaped debate on these issues. Keywords: Northern Ireland, gender, abortion, same-sex marriage 1 Abortion and same-sex marriage: how are non-sectarian controversial issues discussed in Northern Irish politics? Falling outside of the dominant conception of post-conflict identity as primarily ethno- national, cross-cutting issues around sexuality and gender in divided societies such as Northern Ireland and Bosnia-Herzegovina have had less attention within academic literature. Consideration of ethno-national identity has been dominant, and has come at the expense of understanding other types of social difference. In work on post-conflict governance and policy-making, non-ethno-national issues are largely left to one side (for example Noel, 2005); equally, in literature on gender or sexuality politics, divided societies are deemed a ‘special’ case, or overly specific due to their complex politics, and not included in discussion (Larsen et al, 2012, Sheldon, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Northern Ireland
    The Politics of Unionism in Northern Ireland Dominic Bryan The British Isles • Settlers - Plantations in 16th- and 17th-century Ireland • 18th Century: Loyalty, Protestantism and Orangeism • Grand Orange Lodge of Ireland • Act of Union 1800: the idea of a United Kingdom • The landed class and industrial class and a working class • The empire, the bible and the crown • The Irish Unionist Party • The Orange Order • Identity: Britishness – Irishness – Ulster Origins of Unionism • Also the Official Unionist Party or simply the Unionist Party • Derived from the Irish Unionist Party in 19th Century • Foundation – the Ulster Unionist Council of 1905 • Key role of the Orange Order • The role of the gentry and upper-class • Edward Carson, James Craig and the UVF • 1921 – Northern Ireland • Prime Ministers: Craig, Andrews, Brooke, O’Neil and Chichester-Clarke and Faulkner. • Northern Ireland – a study in political control • Ian Paisley and Civil Rights Ulster Unionist Party (UUP) • 1972: The end of Stormont • 1973: splits over the Sunningdale Agreement • Faulkner v Harry West • 1974: Vanguard and the United Ulster Unionist Council • Leader James Molyneaux 1979-1995 • Anglo Irish Agreement • 1995 – 2005 David Trimble and the Belfast Agreement • Division and Defeat. • Leadership of Sir Reg Empey and Mike Nesbitt • Leadership of Robin Swan Ulster Unionist Party (UUP) • Ian Paisley – life and times • 1966 -1971 The Protestant Unionist Party • More Unionist, more Protestant and more working class • Growth in popularity in 1980’s and 1990’s • Staunch opposition to the 1998 Agreement – No talking to terrorists! • Took there seats in Government • 2007: Largest Party in Assembly • First Minister • Peter Robinson and Arlene Foster.
    [Show full text]
  • Fordham International Law Journal
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Fordham University School of Law Fordham International Law Journal Volume 40, Issue 1 2016 Article 3 Does Every Cloud Have a Silver Lining?: Brexit, Repeal of the Human Rights Act and the Northern Ireland Bill of Rights Anne Smith∗ Monica McWilliamsy Priyamvada Yarnellz ∗ y z Copyright c 2016 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj Does Every Cloud Have a Silver Lining?: Brexit, Repeal of the Human Rights Act and the Northern Ireland Bill of Rights Anne Smith, Monica McWilliams, and Priyamvada Yarnell Abstract Following the Brexit referendum in the United Kingdom and the Conservative’s plans to re- place the Human Rights Act with a British Bill of Rights, this article argues that this is an oppor- tunity to re-open the debate on how best to address the current political stalemate on a Northern Ireland Bill of Rights, an unfulfilled element of the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement. We argue that at a time when there is so much uncertainty about the protection and safeguarding of rights with a real risk of lesser rights for fewer people in the United Kingdom, more than ever is the need to provide an alternative to progress the Northern Ireland Bill of Rights. This article provides that alternative. The article is supported in its conclusions by a series of semi-structured interviews with a range of key players involved in the Northern Ireland process and point to the pressing need for an alternative approach to a Bill of Rights for Northern Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on a Complaint Against Mr Basil Mccrea MLA
    Committee on Standards and Privileges Report on a complaint against Mr Basil McCrea MLA Together with the Report of the Assembly Commissioner for Standards; other evidence considered by the Committee; and the Minutes of Proceedings of the Committee Ordered by the Committee on Standards and Privileges to be printed on 1st March 2016 THE REPORT REMAINS EMBARGOED UNTIL 10:01AM on 3rd March 2016 Mandate 2011/16 Seventeenth Report - NIA 284/11-16 Report on a Complaints made against Mr Basil McCrea MLA Committee Powers and Membership 1. The Committee on Standards and Privileges is a Standing Committee of the Northern Ireland Assembly established in accordance with paragraph 10 of Strand One of the Belfast Agreement and under Assembly Standing Order Nos. 51 and 57. The Committee has 11 members including a quorum of 5. 2. The Committee has power: . to consider specific matters relating to privilege referred to it by the Assembly; . to oversee the work of the Assembly Clerk of Standards; . to examine the arrangement for the compilation, maintenance and accessibility of the Register of Members’ Interests and any other registers of interest established by the Assembly, and to review from time to time the form and content of those registers; . to consider any specific complaints made in relation to the registering or declaring of interests referred to it; . to consider any matter relating to the conduct of Members; . to recommend any modifications to any Assembly code of conduct as may from time to time appear to be necessary. 3. The Committee is appointed at the start of every Assembly, and has power to send for persons, papers and records that are relevant to its enquiries.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Rick Wilford Paper
    Hi I've been away on & off so too little time available to furnish a response to the Bill. Had I more notice I could have done something. Instead, perhaps the Committee might take a look at my article in the current issue of Parliamentary Affairs, 'Two Cheers for Consociational Democracy.....' Its focus is on Assembly & Executive reform. Rick Wilford Parliamentary Affairs (2015) 68, 757–774 doi:10.1093/pa/gsu024 Advance Access Publication 11 November 2014 Two Cheers for Consociational Democracy? Reforming the Northern Ireland Assembly and Executive Downloaded from Rick Wilford* School of Politics, International Studies and Philosophy, Queen’s University, 25 University Square, Belfast BT7 1PB, UK *Correspondence: [email protected] http://pa.oxfordjournals.org/ This article discusses the attempts to reform the Northern Ireland Assembly and Executive by the former’s Assembly and Executive Review Committee. It situates the Committee’sreview of the Belfast Agreement’sStrand One institutions within the context both of prior proposals to effect reform and the constraints, institu- tional and behavioural, created by Northern Ireland’s model of consociational democracy. at Northern Ireland Assembly on November 5, 2015 1. Introduction In his 1938 essay, ‘What I Believe’, E M Forster voiced ‘two cheers for democracy: one, because it admits variety and two, because it permits criticism’ (Forster, 1972). ‘Variety’ or, to adopt the consociational lexicon, ‘inclusiveness’,is a corner- stone of devolved institutional design in Northern Ireland (NI), and the compos- ition of the Assembly and Executive Review Committee (AERC) tasked to review the potential for reform of the Strand One institutions—the subject of this paper—meets that test (see below).
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Women in Politics and the Northern Ireland Assembly Together with Written Submissions
    Assembly and Executive Review Committee Report on Women in Politics and the Northern Ireland Assembly Together with Written Submissions Ordered by the Assembly and Executive Review Committee to be printed 17 February 2015 This report is the property of the Assembly and Executive Review Committee. Neither the report nor its contents should be disclosed to any person unless such disclosure is authorised by the Committee. THE REPORT REMAINS EMBARGOED UNTIL COMMENCEMENT OF THE DEBATE IN PLENARY. Mandate 2011/16 Sixth Report - NIA 224/11-16 Membership and Powers Membership and Powers Powers The Assembly and Executive Review Committee is a Standing Committee established in accordance with Section 29A and 29B of the Northern Ireland Act 1998 and Standing Order 59 which states: “(1) There shall be a standing committee of the Assembly to be known as the Assembly and Executive Review Committee. (2) The committee may (a) exercise the power in section 44(1) of the Northern Ireland Act 1998; (b) report from time to time to the Assembly and the Executive Committee. (3) The committee shall consider (a) such matters relating to the operation of the provisions of Parts 3 and 4 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998 as enable it to make the report referred to in section 29A(3) of that Act; and (b) such other matters relating to the functioning of the Assembly or the Executive Committee as may be referred to it by the Assembly.” Membership The Committee has eleven members including a Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson with a quorum of five. The membership of
    [Show full text]
  • Constituency Profiles for Further and Higher Education in Northern Ireland
    COUNTMAKE EDUCATION CONSTITUENCY PROFILES FOR FURTHER AND HIGHER EDUCATION IN NORTHERN IRELAND CONSTITUENCY PROFILES FOR FURTHER AND HIGHER EDUCATION MAKE EDUCATION COUNT IN NORTHERN IRELAND Introduction It’s 2010 – the second decade of the 21st century – and it remains a stark reality that Northern Ireland is still riddled with some of the more dire statistics in the UK, when it comes to educational attainment and employment. Northern Ireland is bottom of UK tables that measure employment rates and people with qualifications, according to UCU analysis. Just over two-thirds of people in Northern Ireland (69.7%) are employed, the worst percentage of the UK's 12 regions. The South East of England tops the table with over three-quarters of people (78.5%) employed. The average is 74%. Northern Ireland has the highest percentage of people without qualifications. One in five (21.8%) have no qualifications, which is a long way off the national average of 12.4%. Northern Ireland fares slightly better when it comes to the percentage of people with a degree though. Over a quarter of people (25.7%) have a degree, which puts Northern Ireland in the middle of the regions' table but still some way behind the average of 29%. Contents Political constituency analysis 03 Lagan Valley 13 Summary of key findings 03 Mid Ulster 14 Constituency profiles Newry and Amargh 15 Belfast East 05 North Antrim 16 Belfast North 06 North Down 17 Belfast South 07 South Antrim 18 Belfast West 08 South Down 19 East Antrim 09 Strangford 20 East Londonderry 10 Upper Bann 21
    [Show full text]
  • The Orange Order in Northern Ireland: Has Political Isolation, Sectarianism, Secularism, Or Declining Social Capital Proved the Biggest Challenge?
    The Orange Order in Northern Ireland: Has political isolation, sectarianism, secularism, or declining social capital proved the biggest challenge? Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Liverpool for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy by Andrew McCaldon August 2018 Department of Politics University of Liverpool Liverpool L69 3BX The Orange Order in Northern Ireland Contents Dedication 003 Acknowledgements 004 Abstract 005 List of Abbreviations 006 List of Tables 007 Introduction 008 Chapter One The Orange Order in Northern Ireland: The State of Play 037 Chapter Two From pre– to post–Agreement Northern Ireland: 070 Political isolation and the Grand Orange Lodge Chapter Three Intolerance in a tolerant society? 106 Parading, sectarianism, and declining middle–class respectability Chapter Four An Order Re–routed: 135 Interface Orangeism in Drumcree and Ardoyne Chapter Five ‘The Biggest Threat’? The impact of secularism 167 Chapter Six Parading Alone: The decline of social capital in 195 Northern Ireland and its impacts on the Orange Order Conclusion 228 Bibliography 239 Appendix I Interview Questions 266 Andrew McCaldon Page 2 of 267 The Orange Order in Northern Ireland For my mother who, by the second Twelfth of July parade, started to enjoy them and my uncle, Ian Buxton (1968–2018) who never got to see it finished Andrew McCaldon Page 3 of 267 The Orange Order in Northern Ireland Acknowledgements To Professor Jon Tonge, I offer my sincere thanks for having withstood the mental anguish of supervising both my undergraduate and postgraduate research at the University of Liverpool. His advice has been beyond invaluable and he is the model of patience, whose professionalism, knowledge–base, and subject enthusiasm never cease to amaze me.
    [Show full text]