Jlegtsfattfe ^Journal
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Clarion University
INSIDE More Alumni Features Alumni Updates Homecoming Highlights University News Winter Sports Preview Clarion University November 1998 Volume 45 www.clarion.edu/news Alumni News Number 3 Trustees approve Master Plan A comprehensive Master Plan that will help guide Clarion University of Pennsylvania facility decisions until the year 2016 has been unanimously approved by the Clarion University Council of Trustees. Trustee Syed R. Ali-Zaidi said the plan will “serve as the comprehensive framework within which specific building and site development decisions, space accommodation strategies, and facility design decisions will be made in the future, with implementation to occur as funding permits.” The plan was developed over three years and included input from students, employees, alumni, and the public. Over 75 meetings were held to provide opportunities for input by all the Heraldic crest returns university constituencies. Retired faculty member and The general themes used in the plan call for unifying of administrator Dr. Charles J. (Jack) Shontz campus, reducing vehicular and pedestrian conflicts, creating a recently presented a heraldic crest of Clarion campus “heart,” improving housing quality and diversity, improving University to President Diane L. Reinhard. recreational opportunities, maximizing adaptability of facilities, The crest was designed by David Christie-Murray, a visiting professor of setting phasing priorities, and improving the community “interface.” English from the United Kingdom. Christie- The plan offers recommendations that will address space Murray was a recognized scholar of heraldry, deficiencies for academic, recreational, and student residential and the motto and design of the crest are his Master Plan looks to the future needs. The plan also looks at selected reorganization and alone. -
A Brotherhood of Extraordinary Gentlemen
Summer 2016 A Brotherhood of Extraordinary Gentlemen LIC THO HI A GH C L S A C H R T O O N E L INSIDE: The unique bond that makes us all C P P i ro Deo et Patria a Men of Faith, Men of Scholarship, Men of Service t i ts n bu lva rgh, Pennsy John A. Staley IV, ’61 Rudolph “Rudy” F. Zupancic, ’50 Inside the Quadrangle Cover Story – A Message from the Principal Page 16 Central Catholic High School Administration Dear Friends of Central Catholic, Brother Robert Schaefer, FSC, Principal Vincent Ciaramella, ’71, Assistant Principal for Academic Affairs Recently, a task force from an all-boys Catholic high school in Houston visited Central Andrew Macurak, Assistant Principal for Student Affairs C. Devin Crummie, ’97, Assistant Principal for Faculty and Catholic as part of their project to identify “best practices” among other all-boys Curriculum Development Catholic schools that had been identified as “schools of excellence.” The first question Steven S. Bezila, ’99, Dean of Students the visiting team asked me, “What are you most proud of at Central Catholic?” I was Board of Directors able to answer quickly and most sincerely. It is our fidelity to our founding mission. John A. Staley, V, ’84, Chair For almost nine decades, I told them, Central Catholic has never strayed from the James J. Leeper, ’70, Vice Chair Gary C. Doyle, ’80, Treasurer Athletics – Page 9 inspirational vision of Saint John Baptist de La Salle that those pioneering 14 Christian Dana E. Hanna, Secretary Brothers brought with them to Pittsburgh back in 1927. -
PLACE SCHOOL LOGO HERE Penn Hills School District Grades 5-12
PLACE Penn Hills School SCHOOL District LOGO Grades 5-12 HERE STUDENT HANDBOOK 2016 -2017 Linton Middle School- Grades 5-8 250 Aster Street Pittsburgh, PA 15235 Penn Hills Senior High School 309 Collins Drive Pittsburgh, PA 15235 Dr. Nancy Hines, Superintendent The Penn Hills School District does not discriminate on the basis of age, race, color, national or ethnic origin, sex, or handicap in employment practices or in administration of any of its educational programs and activities in accordance with applicable federal statutes and regulations. Right to Amend: The Penn Hills School District reserves the right to amend policies or procedures in the Student Handbook when necessary or appropriate. Proper notification will be disseminated accordingly. Alma Mater Oh, Penn High School Our best we pledge to you. The days we have spent here. We always will hold dear. Oh, red and gold staunch friends we are foretold forever We'll be loyal To our Penn High School. Student Identification & Disclaimer……………………………………………….……...1 Alma Mater……………………………………………………………...………….….….2 Handbook Table of Contents……………………………………………………….……..3 Board Members/Administration/Guidance…………………….….………………..……..5 Statement of Awareness………………………………………...…………………………6 Handbook Signature……………………………………..……………………………......7 School District Calendar………………………………………………………………......8 Part I Introduction………………………………………………...…….……………........8 Part II Activities – Sports, Clubs, Eligibility, Awards ……….…..…….……………..8-13 Part III General Information………………………………….….….……..................... -
Municipality of Penn Hills, Pa Fy 2020-2024 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
MUNICIPALITY OF PENN HILLS, PA Penn Hills Government Center, 102 Duff Road, Penn Hills, PA FY 2020-2024 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE For Submission to HUD for the Community Development Block Grant Program DRAFT Municipality of Penn Hills, Pennsylvania Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 2 I. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 8 II. Background Data .......................................................................................... 10 A. Population, Race, Ethnicity, and Religion: ............................................ 10 B. Households: .......................................................................................... 25 C. Income and Poverty: ............................................................................. 31 D. Employment: ......................................................................................... 38 E. Housing Profile: .................................................................................... 41 F. Financing: ............................................................................................. 44 G. Household Types: ................................................................................. 48 H. Cost Overburden: ................................................................................. 52 I. Housing Problems: .............................................................................. -
The Dangers of Symbolic Legislation: Perceptions and Realities of the New Burden-Of-Proof Rules
Florida State University College of Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Publications 3-1999 The Dangers of Symbolic Legislation: Perceptions and Realities of the New Burden-of-Proof Rules Steve R. Johnson Florida State University College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Steve R. Johnson, The Dangers of Symbolic Legislation: Perceptions and Realities of the New Burden-of- Proof Rules, 84 IOWA LAW REVIEW 413 (1999), Available at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/articles/253 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Dangers of Symbolic Legislation: Perceptions and Realities of the New Burden-of-Proof Rules Steve R. Johnson* There is a growing political science and legal literature on the use of symbolism in the political and legislative process.' Tax law is a natural arena for such inquiry as tax law touches virtually every type of human in- teraction, is heavily value-driven, and is a perennial political battleground.' This article examines a recent tax law change-the enactment of new bur- den-of-proof rules in the summer of 1998--concluding that it is a perni- cious exercise in symbolic legislation. Burden-of-proof rules determine how much evidence a party must in- troduce at trial in order to prevail. In theory, a dispute-resolution system could operate without established burden-of-proof rules, but such a system would impose greater demands of perspicacity on its triers of fact and likely would be less predictable as to its outcomes? Thus, discussion and debate about what burden-of-proof rules should prevail have been part of our legal *Associate Professor of Law, Indiana University School of Law-Bloomington. -
An Updated Analysis of the 2008 Presidential Candidates’ Tax Plans: Revised August 15, 2008
An Updated Analysis of the 2008 Presidential Candidates’ Tax Plans: Revised August 15, 2008 Len Burman Surachai Khitatrakun Greg Leiserson Jeff Rohaly Eric Toder Bob Williams* Revised August 15, 2008 Updated September 12, 2008 The current revision (8/15/08) reflects modifications to Senator Obama’s tax proposals announced on August 14, 2008. See http://origin.barackobama.com/taxes/. This version (9/12/08) incorporates updated budget projections from the Congressional Budget Office (http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/97xx/doc9706/09-08-Update.pdf), corrects some typos, and includes editorial changes. However, we have not yet revised our revenue estimates to take account of CBO’s latest economic projections. * Tax Policy Center and Urban Institute. We are grateful to Katie Lim for research assistance and to Aviva Aron- Dine, Linda Blumberg, Bill Gale, Bo Garrett, John Holahan, and Kim Rueben for helpful advice and comments, and to Doug Holtz-Eakin of the McCain campaign and Jason Furman, Austan Goolsbee, and Jeff Liebman of the Obama campaign for many hours of work in explaining and fleshing out details of their candidate’s plans. Joy Falzarano and Julianna Koch assisted in preparing the document for publication. The analysis is based on campaign aides’ descriptions of the plans, candidates’ statements and web sites, and our assumptions about essential details unspecified by the campaigns. We will update the analysis as new information becomes available. Some interim updates and discussion will also be posted on the Tax Policy Center blog, TaxVox, which is available at www.taxpolicycenter.taxvox.org. The Tax Policy Center is nonpartisan and none of the authors are affiliated with any presidential campaign. -
Publication 3079, Tax-Exempt Organizations and Gaming
TAX-EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS AND GAMING Publication 3079 (Rev. 10-2018) Catalog Number 25706L Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service www.irs.gov Introduction Saturday night bingo in the church hall, one-armed bandits in the social club, video lottery at the veterans’ club, poker night at the fraternal lodge – these are ex- amples of gaming1 – sometimes called gambling – by organizations exempt from federal income tax. For many years now, exempt organizations have operated these and many other types of games as a part of their activities. Why do organizations “game”? Probably the number one reason is to raise funds – either to help cover the cost of running their organizations or to support worthy causes. For some organizations, gaming also permits its members to socialize with each other and fosters fellowship. Whatever the reason, an organization conducting any type of gaming should understand the relationship between that activity and its exempt purposes, and how the activity can impact its federal tax-exempt status. An organization engaged in gaming activities also needs to understand its tax and informa- tion reporting responsibilities. This publication provides an exempt organization with the information it needs to engage in gaming activities in a manner that will not jeopardize its exempt status or lead to unexpected tax liabilities, whether the organization is currently running games or is considering whether to start. Note: Many states and localities regulate gaming by exempt organizations. This publication does not address state or local gaming licensing requirements. For licensing requirements, please consult the appropriate agencies in your locale. 1 Gaming includes (but is not limited to): bingo, pull-tabs/instant bingo (including satellite and internet bingo), Texas Hold-Em poker and other card games, raffles, scratch-offs, charitable gaming tickets, break-opens, hard cards, banded tickets, jar tickets, pickle cards, Lucky Seven cards, Nevada Club tickets, casino nights, Las Vegas nights and coin-op- erated gambling devices. -
Watch List Announced for the 2014 Fred Mitchell Award
WATCH LIST ANNOUNCED FOR THE 2014 FRED MITCHELL AWARD Contact: Chris Kearney – [email protected] Fred Mitchell – [email protected] July 30, 2014 - The Watch List for the Fred Mitchell Award includes 36 Football Championship Subdivision (FCS), Division II, III, National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics (NAIA) and National Junior College Athletic Association (NJCAA) collegiate place-kickers that were nominated by their colleges for excellence on the football field and in the community. The Award’s Selection Committee Chairman Chris Kearney said, “These place-kickers are impressive on the football field and off the field representing their schools, their football teams, their conferences, their communities, their families and themselves. We look forward to following their accomplishments during the next few months. Of the 36 kickers, 21 led their team in scoring last season and 12 finished second on their team in scoring so there is a lot of scoring power returning this season.” The Watch List includes place-kickers from more than 750 eligible colleges. Fred Mitchell said, “It is a pleasure to include these fine young men on the Watch List for this Award, which is celebrating its sixth year in 2014. We are delighted to recognize them based on outstanding performance in the community and expectations going into the 2014 college football season. It is also a thrill to see so many familiar names on the Watch List, including 13 nominees and two place-kickers that were among the top ten for the Award last season.” The breakdown of the 36 place-kickers is as follows: • Collegiate Division – 7 FCS, 12 Division II, 12 Division III, 3 NAIA and 2 NJCAA • State – the place-kickers play at schools located in 24 different states • Year – 16 Seniors, 11 Juniors, 9 Sophomores • Fred Mitchell Award 2013 nominees that are on the 2014 Watch List - 13 In alphabetical order, the 2014 Fred Mitchell Award Watch List is provided below. -
Reforming the Tax Code &
BACK IN BLACK | 1 REFORMING TAX EXPENDITURES & ENDING SPECIAL INTEREST GIVEAWAYS From teens with summer jobs to multi-billion dollar corporations, taxpayers across the country sent $2.16 trillion to Washington last year.1 Most Americans agree the tax code is confusing and unfair, making it even more frustrating to hand Uncle Sam nearly twenty five percent of their monthly paycheck. The tax code is long overdue for comprehensive restructuring. Yet, instead of considering broad reform to simplify the code and lower rates, Washington continues to make the problem worse— doling out new tax breaks and subsidies in the form of tax credits to well-connected companies and special interests with powerful lobbyists who seem to have more influence than most members of Congress. The result is a complex tax structure that benefits only a few, hinders economic growth and drives up costs and taxes for many working families and businesses across the country.2 In part, the complexity of the tax code arises from the countless spending programs hidden within it. Masquerading as tax cuts, many of these programs are no different from any other federal program that spends taxpayer money. Cleaning up the code by eliminating the most egregious tax giveaways will pave the way to reducing tax rates for all Americans and small businesses. The need for fundamental tax reform is clear: as government has grown so has the tax code. It was designed to collect from citizens only those resources truly needed to fund basic federal functions, but has become the latest playground for Washington politicians to hand out benefits to their favorite special interests. -
Why Americans Are Proud to Pay Taxes
© Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. INTRODUCTION All accumulation . of personal property, beyond what a man’s own hands produce, is derived to him by living in society; and he owes on every principle of justice, of gratitude, and of civilization, a part of that accumulation back again to society from whence the whole came. —American revolutionary Thomas Paine, 1797 Woman now holds a vast amount of the property in the country, and pays her full proportion of taxes, revenue included. On what principle, then, do you deny her representation? — National Women’s Rights Convention, 1866 Since the founding of the country, Americans have talked about taxes as a debt owed to one’s fellow countrymen.1 As Thomas Paine argued, the whole of one’s livelihood, beyond the meager life an individual could secure in a state of na- ture, is due to the society in which one lives. Taxes are how one pays one’s community back for making a civilized life possible, he argued. The sentiment was echoed a century later by Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., who wrote, “[T]axes are what we pay for civilized society.”2 But responsibility does not run only from taxpayer to community; taxpayers also make claims upon government. [ 1 ] For general queries, contact [email protected] © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. -
171022851 Funding Year 2017 Category of Service Category 1
OMB 3060-0806 Approval by OMB FCC Form 471 November 2015 Description of Services Ordered and Certification Form 471 FCC Form 471 Application Information Nickname AIU3 RWAN Circuits Application Number 171022851 Funding Year 2017 Category of Service Category 1 Billed Entity Contact Information Allegheny IU RWAN Consortium Debra M Kriete 475 E. Waterfront Drive Homestead PA 15120 717-232-0222 412-394-5700 [email protected] [email protected] Billed Entity Number 17000532 FCC Registration Number 0011701786 Applicant Type Consortium Consulting Firms Name Consultant City State Zip Phone Email Registration Code Number Number DEBRA M. KRIETE, ESQ. 16043864 Mechanicsburg PA 17050 717-232-0222 [email protected] Entity Information Consortium Entities School Entity - Details BEN Name Urban/ State State NCES Code Alternative School Attributes Endowment Rural LEA ID School ID Discount 16535 FORBES ROAD CAREER Urban 1030 000005016 N/A Public School None & TECHNOLOGY 23807 CTR. School Entity - Discount Rate Calculation Details BEN Name Urban/ Number of Students CEP Rural Students Count Based Percentage on Estimate 16535 FORBES ROAD CAREER & TECHNOLOGY CTR. Urban 0 No Related School District Entity - Details Page 1 BEN Name Urban/ State State NCES School District Endowment Rural LEA ID School Code Attributes ID 125160 CLAIRTON CITY SCHOOL Urban Public School District None DISTRICT 125164 ELIZABETH-FORWARD SCH Urban Public School District None DISTRICT 125167 PINE-RICHLAND SCHOOL Urban Public School District None DISTRICT 125172 SOUTH FAYETTE TWP -
A Closer Look the Super Committee: Where They Stand on Medicaid, Medicare, and the Affordable Care Act
A Closer Look The Super Committee: Where They Stand on Medicaid, Medicare, and The Affordable Care Act Families USA • August 2011 Introduction As part of the deal to raise the debt ceiling and avoid a U.S. default on our obligations, Congressional leadership appointed a “super committee” of 12 members of Congress – six Democrats and six Republicans. They have been tasked with reducing the deficit by $1.5 trillion over the next 10 years. The super committee must present its plan to Congress by Thanksgiving. This piece profiles the members of that committee, providing information about their stance on Medicaid, Medicare, and the Affordable Care Act, as well as where they stand regarding the inclusion of revenue as part of a debt reduction plan. Members of the committee are listed in alphabetical order by party affiliation, with the House members listed first. If one of the super committee members represents you, it’s important For more information that you contact him or her, particularly at key points during this on key points in the process. Even if none of the super committee members represent process, see this Debt Deal and Budget you, your voice is still critical. You should contact the 12 members Timetable. and share your opinions. After all, they are making decisions that affect you. It is also crucial that you tell your Senators and Representatives what you think. The super committee members are their colleagues; they can communicate your message. Furthermore, in December Congress will have to vote on the super committee’s plan, so it is important that your Senators and Representatvies know where you—one of their constituents—stand.