City, University of London Institutional Repository

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

City, University of London Institutional Repository City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Long, Robert James (1997). A structural analysis of Lloyd's of London. (Unpublished Doctoral thesis, City, University of London) This is the submitted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/20858/ Link to published version: Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] J>Xfs)ö 1 ^ 4 - 2 A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF LLOYD’S OF LONDON ROBERT JAMES LONG THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF INVESTMENT, RISK MANAGEMENT AND INSURANCE THE CITY UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL LONDON June 1997 CONTENTS List o f Figures v Acknowledgments vii Abstract viii Introduction and overview of thesis ix In. 1 Subject matter of thesis ix In. 2 Methodology x In. 3 Sources of information xv In.4 Overview of thesis xv In. 5 Contribution to knowledge and recommendations for xvii further research Chapter One Overview and Statistics 1 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 An historical perspective 1 1.2 An overview of Lloyd’s 2 1.3 Lloyd’s accounting system 3 1.4 The course o f business at Lloyd’s 4 1.5 Central resources of Lloyd’s 7 1.6 Technical reserves at Lloyd’s 8 1.7 Statistics relating to Lloyd’s 9 1.8 The capacity o f Lloyd’s, the number o f syndicates, net 10 premium income and profitability 1.9 Business written in Lloyd’s 16 1.10 Reinsurance and direct business written at Lloyd’s 20 1.11 Lloyd’s share of the UK insurance and reinsurance market 23 1.12 Lloyd’s proportion of the world non-life insurance and 28 reinsurance market 1.13 The geographical split o f Lloyd’s business 29 1.14 Summary of statistics 31 1.15 A note on the constituents of the London Market 32 Chapter two Studies on Lloyd’s ' 36 2.1 Introduction 36 2.2 Overview of Lloyd ’ s regulatory status 3 6 2.3 The Lloyd’s Act 1871 37 2.4 The Cromer Report 38 2.5 Self-regulation at Lloyd’s 42 2.6 The Fisher Report and self-regulation 45 l 2.7 The Lloyd’s Bill 48 2.8 The scandals of 1982 49 2.9 Developments since 1982 50 2.10 The Neill Report 51 2.11 Comments on Reports and Acts 1871 to 1986 55 2.12 “Lloyd’s: a route forward” Report of the Task Force 56 2.12.1 Background 56 2.12.2 Major recommendations of the Task Force Report 57 2.13 The losses at Lloyd’s 61 2.14 The Lloyd’s Business Plan 63 2.15 Lloyd’s Reconstruction and Renewal 67 2.16 Conclusion 69 Chapter three The architecture of Lloyd’s and the capital base 72 3.1 Introduction 72 3.2 Architecture 72 3.2.1 Internal architecture of Lloyd’s 72 3.2.2 External architecture of Lloyd’s 78 3.3 The concept of capital 81 3.4 The chain of security at Lloyd’s 84 3.5 The introduction of corporate capital at Lloyd’s 93 3.6 Lloyd’s new capital structure 95 3.7 Recent structural changes in Lloyd’s 105 3.8 Corporate capital and its influence on the structure of 107 Lloyd’s. 3.9 Lloyd’s brokers 111 3.10 Conclusion - the future role of the broker 123 3.11 Should Lloyd’s be established in other countries? 126 Chapter four Two Structural Models: The Porter Model and the Market- 129 Hierarchy-Network Model 4.1 Introduction 129 4.1.1 The Porter Model 129 4.2 The Porter model and the direct insurance market 130 4.2.1 The need for insurance 130 4.2.2 Regulation and consumer pressure 131 4.2.3 Substitutes for insurance 132 4.2.4 The role of suppliers of capital 132 4.2.5 The buyers of insurance 136 4.3 The Porter model and the reinsurance market 137 4.3.1 The reinsurance market and the threat of entry 137 4.3.2 The purchasers of reinsurance 140 4.3.3 The suppliers of capital 141 u 4.3.4 Substitutes for reinsurance 143 4.4 The position of Lloyd’s in the Porter model 144 4.5 The Market-Hierarchy-Network Model 147 4.6 Towards a classification of the structure of Lloyd’s 155 4.7 Current structural changes in the insurance industry 163 Chapter five The nature of cooperation within Lloyd’s 165 5.1 Introduction 165 5.2 The subscription system 165 5.3 Developing a structural model of Lloyd’s 169 5.4 Towards a model of Lloyd’s 176 5.5 Institutions comparable to Lloyd ’ s 178 5.6 The operations of the Illinois Insurance Exchange 179 5.7 Regulation of the Illinois Insurance Exchange 181 5.8 Comparison of the Illinois Insurance Exchange and Lloyd’s 182 Chapter six Innovation, entrepreneurism and Lloyd ’s 184 6.1 Introduction 184 6.2 The nature of entrepreneurship 184 6.3 Theories of entrepreneurism 186 6.4 Attributes of the entrepreneur 189 6.5 The entrepreneurial organisation 190 6.6 The entrepreneurial nature of Lloyd’s syndicates 195 6.7 Corporate entrepreneurship and Lloyd’s 201 6.8 Entrepreneurism and the introduction of incorporated capital 208 Chapter seven The reputation of Lloyd’ s 216 7.1 Introduction - what is reputation? 216 7.2 Reputation and Lloyd’s 221 7.3 Who owns the reputation of Lloyd’s? 224 7.4 Conclusion 231 Chapter eight Conclusions and recommendations 235 8.1 Conclusions and recommendations 235 8.2 Recommendations for regulatory reform 236 8.3 The influence of corporate capital on the architecture 241 o f Lloyd’s 8.4 The Central Fund 244 8.5 Conclusion: The future structure of Lloyd’s 245 iii LIST OF FIGURES 1.1 The capacity of Lloyd ’ s Between pages 10 and 11 1.2 The number of Names as at 1 st January Between pages 11 and 12 1.3 (a) The profitability of Lloyd’s 13 1.3 (b) The profitability of Lloyd ’ s Between pages 13 and 14 1.4 The number of Lloyd’s syndicates from 1948 to 1996 Between pages 14 and 15 1.5 Distribution of syndicates by size 15 1.6 Net premium income to Lloyd’s Between pages 15 and 16 1.7 Ratio of net premium income to gross capacity Between pages 15 and 16 1.8 Gross premium income 16 1.9 Classification of business written at Lloyd’s into the 17 five traditional markets 1.10 Net ceded premium 18 1.11 Classification of net premium income into the five 19 traditional Lloyd’s markets 1.12 Calendar year gross premiums split into direct and 21 reinsurance 1.13 Breakdown of calendar year gross premium split into 22 direct and reinsurance 1.14 Lloyd’s premiums processed through LPSO 23 1.15 General business gross written premium income in £m 25 1.16 General business net written premium income in £m 25 1.17 Lloyd’s revenue figures. Gross of ceded reinsurance, 26 net of brokerage 1.18 Lloyd’s revenue figures. Gross of ceded reinsurance, 27 gross of brokerage 1.19 Lloyd’s revenue figures net of ceded reinsurance and 28 gross of brokerage 1.20 Geographical provenance of Lloyd’s gross premium Between pages 30 and 31 income (gross of ceded reinsurance and net of brokerage) 2.1 Percentage expense ratios of Lloyd’s and various 59 companies 2.2 The Lloyd’s Central Fund 63 3.1 The structure of Lloyd’s pre Task Force Report (1991) 74 3.2 Recommended structure of the Council of Lloyd’s and Between pages 75 and 76 the Market and Regulatory Boards as proposed by the Morse Report 3.3 Security o f a Lloyd’s policy Between pages 87 and 88 3.4 Lloyd’s capital structure from 1994 onwards 97 3.5 Lloyd’s allocated capacity 1990-96 101 3.6 Lloyd’s licenses 111 3.7 Shares of Lloyd’s total premiums placed by the largest 118 broker groups, 1993 4.1 The Porter Model Between pages 130 and 131 v Applying the Porter model to the direct insurance Between pages 131 and 132 market Applying the Porter model to the reinsurance market Between pages 131 and 132 4.4 The twenty largest reinsurers in the world 138 4.5 Applying the Porter model to Lloyd’s Between pages 146 and 147 4.6 Organisational forms 148 4.7 Stylized comparison of forms of economic organisation 154 4.8 Structures present within Lloyd’s 162 5.1 A descriptive model of Lloyd’s Between pages 178 and 179 5.2 A comparison of the features of the Illinois Insurance 183 Exchange and Lloyd’s 6.1 The underwriting structure of two syndicates 194 6.2 1995 Airline leads 197 6.3 Corporate capital at Lloyd’s 208 8.1(a) The current management and regulatory structure (as Between pages 239 and 240 given in the Morse Report) and the proposed new management and regulatory structure 8.1(b) The composition of the Regulatory and Market Boards Between pages 239 and 240 and the proposed composition of the Business Development Board 8.2 The average capacity of syndicates from 1967 to 1996 Between pages 241 and 242 8.3 Analysis of managing agent alignment Between pages 242 and 243 8.4 1997 corporate members with insurance industry Between pages 244 and 245 involvement vi Acknowledgments I am grateful to my supervisor, Prof.
Recommended publications
  • Download PDF (77.1
    Index Abraham, K.S. 133 Beck, Ulrich 129 absorbing risk 133 behavioral anomalies 6, 84–9, 243–4 actuarial estimation 109–10 behavior-control functions 106 ad hoc Beijing Normal University 90, 189, assistance 196 235 compensation tool 45 Ben-Shahar, Omri 134 direct payment 40, 169, 207 Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance institutions 30 Reform Act of 2012 69, 152 relief 71, 97 Bruggeman, Véronique 95 adaptation 253 business interruption 104 and climate change 103, 164 adverse selection 5, 13, 47, 54, 66–8, California Earthquake Authority 55, 75, 81–2, 97, 99, 111, 127, 140, 142 162, 246 capacity (of insurers) 6–8, 11, 19, 30, AES v Steadfast 116–19 53, 63–6, 82–4, 89–91, 96, 113, agricultural insurance 122–3, 126, 136, 152, 161–2 173, government-subsidized 50 176, 179–80, 217, 222, 225, 227–8, pilot projects 49 242–3, 249–52 policies 49, 50 and reinsurance 199, 206–8, 215 Regulation on Agriculture Insurance capacity gap 82, 228, 242, 252 50, 94 capital markets 11, 53, 54, 59, 64–5, aircraft insurance 110 212, 217–8, 221, 226–40 all-hazard insurance policy 245 Caribbean Catastrophe Risk Insurance Alternative Risk Transfers (ARTs) 217, Facility 60 221, 236 catastrophe (cat) bonds 3, 113, 182, ambiguity of risk 112–13 212 217–40 see also uncertainty see also insurance-linked securities, American International Group (AIG) insurance securitization 1, 104 catastrophe derivatives 182, 221–2 “appetite” of insurers 84 catastrophe disasters 5, 8, 12–6, 72, 74, Arrow, Kenneth 35 92, 102, 155, 171–3, 255–6 asbestos claims 108–9 see also natural catastrophes assessment insurance 110 catastrophe fund 142, 210–12, 254 asset-backed securitization 237 catastrophe insurance 6, 8–11, 13–4, Association of British Insurers (ABI) 44, 73, 80, 89–99, 103, 105, 108, 148, 149 112–14, 121–8, 129–175, 208–9, authoritarian regime 7, 33 212–5, 216 availability crisis 52 affordability 63, 66, 69–70, 125, 127–8 174, 206, 250, 256 Baker, Tom 133, 134 demand 84–9, 92–3 Barry, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Pocket Guide to Lloyd's
    Our Market Our Past Our Home Pocket Guide “For more than three Welcome to Lloyd’s centuries, the Lloyd’s Lloyd’s is the world’s leading market has been insurance and reinsurance sharing risk to protect marketplace. Through the collective intelligence and risk-sharing people and businesses, 03 inspiring them to expertise of the market’s underwriters and brokers, Lloyd’s Our Market create a braver world” helps to create a braver world. The Lloyd’s market provides the John Neal, CEO, Lloyd’s leadership and insight to anticipate and understand risk, and the knowledge to develop relevant, new and innovative forms of insurance for customers globally. And it promises a trusted, enduring partnership built on the confidence that Lloyd’s protects what matters most: helping people, businesses and communities to recover in times of need. Our Market: Lloyd’s in a day Most of the business written at Lloyd’s is still conducted face-to-face in the world- famous Underwriting Room at our London Every day, people, businesses and Lime Street headquarters. Brokers place communities in over 200 countries their clients’ risk with Lloyd’s specialist and territories rely on the Lloyd’s underwriters who evaluate, price and market to protect what matters most. accept the risks. On any given working day, ‘The Room’ welcomes more than 5,000 05 And every day, more than 50 leading people, sees more than £100m in premiums insurance companies, over 300 come into the market and sees more than Our Market registered brokers and a global network £49.9m paid out in claims – that’s more than of over 3,900 coverholder office £34,620 in claims per minute.
    [Show full text]
  • Insurance Sector Responses to COVID-19 by Governments, Supervisors and Industry
    Insurance sector responses to COVID-19 by governments, supervisors and industry www.oecd.org/finance/insurance 2 July 2020 The spread of COVID-19 and the measures implemented to reduce its transmission are having (and will continue to have) significant impacts on the (re)insurance sector, as investors, as providers of insurance coverage and as businesses that will need to adapt their approaches to service delivery. This report provides an overview of the measures that governments, insurance regulators and supervisors and insurance associations and individual companies have taken to respond to COVID-19 across three main areas: (i) ensuring continuity of operations; (ii) managing solvency and liquidity risks; and (iii) providing support to policyholders that have been adversely affected by the COVID-19 public health emergency. Summary of response measures Ensuring continuity of insurance services Insurance companies have implemented business continuity plans to maintain the delivery of essential insurance functions with a focus on digital service delivery (requiring regulatory adjustments in some jurisdictions) Insurance supervisors are closely monitoring the implementation of business continuity plans and some are providing specific guidance while taking steps to reduce the administrative burden of regulatory and supervisory functions (reporting, policy and regulation development) Managing solvency and liquidity risks Insurance supervisors are monitoring market, underwriting and liquidity risks based on existing financial and supervisory information including relevant past stress tests results. Many jurisdictions have requested additional data from insurance companies related to risks that have come to light as a result of COVID-19. Some insurance supervisors are implementing existing countercyclical supervisory tools while a few others have made some adjustments to regulatory or supervisory requirements in response to the health emergency, including flexibility in the implementation of investment limits or accounting standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Incentives and Barriers of the Cyber Insurance Market in Europe June 2012
    Incentives and barriers of the cyber insurance market in Europe June 2012 Incentives and barriers of the cyber insurance market in Europe I Acknowledgements This Study was commissioned and managed by ENISA with specialist services provided by RAND Europe. ENISA would like to thank Mr. Neil Robinson for his professionalism and dedication to this project. In addition, ENISA wishes to acknowledge and thank Prof. Robin Bloomfield of City University of London, Mr. Andrea Renda of CEPS, Mr. Michael Mainelli of Z/Yen, Mrs. Simona Cavallini and Mr. Fabio Bisogni of Formit Foundation for their prompt support, valuable input and material provided for the compilation of this Study. II Incentives and barriers of the cyber insurance market in Europe About ENISA The European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA) is a centre of network and information security expertise for the EU, its member states, the private sector and Europe’s citizens. ENISA works with these groups to develop advice and recommendations on good practice in information security. It assists EU member states in implementing relevant EU legislation and works to improve the resilience of Europe’s critical information infrastructure and networks. ENISA seeks to enhance existing expertise in EU member states by supporting the development of cross-border communities committed to improving network and information security throughout the EU. More information about ENISA and its work can be found at www.enisa.europa.eu Contact details For contacting ENISA or for general enquiries on this Study on cyber insurance market in Europe please contact Nicole Falessi and Dr. Konstantinos Moulinos and use the following details: Resilience and CIIP Program Technical Department Email: [email protected] Incentives and barriers of the cyber insurance market in Europe III Legal notice Notice must be taken that this publication represents the views and interpretations of the authors and editors, unless stated otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • The Royal Engineers Journal
    THE ROYAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL. Vol. XII. No. 6. DECEMBER, 1910. CONTENTS. PAGI'. 1. The Military Uses of the Aerostat. By Capt. P. W. L. BROKE-SMITH, R. E. ... 395 2. A Field Practice Sub-Target. By Capt. F. V. THOMPSON, R.E ... ... 403 3. Gibraltar under Moor, Spaniard, and Briton (conlinyted). By Col. E. R. KENYON, R. E. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 409 4. Major-General Sir William Reid, R.E., G.C.M.G., K.C.B., F.R.S. (concluded). By Col. ROBT. H. VETCH, C.B., late R.E. (Wih Photo) . ... ... 427 5. Memoir:-Major-General Edward Renouard James, Royal Engineers (concluded). By Col. ROBT. H. VETCH, C.B., late R.E. .. 443 6. Transcript:-The Demolition of the Hun-Io Railway Bridge. (From the Razvyedchik). (With Photo) ... .. ...... ... 453 7. Notices of Magazines .. ... ... ... ... 455 8. Recent Publications of Military Interest ... ... ... 459 9. Correspondence:-Militia Post, Miranshah, Tochi Valley. By Major D. H. McNEILE, Comdt., N.W. Militia .. ... ... 466 INSTITUTION OF RE OFFICE COPY DO NOT REMOVE p. GUARANTEED: Immunity from repairs. Smooth on both sides. Roofs 5,781 Ibs. \ covered with "Eternit" Tensile Strength, T Crushing Force, 8,281 Ibs. lew weigh about 22 bs. Per Squarequare Inch andand LIGHT. per square yard. always inoreasing : \ with age. ON THE ADMIRALTY AND WAR OFFICE LISTS. For Diagonal or Honeycomb Style of Roofing. Colours: Grey, Blue and Red. Stock Size, l.5" Iby 15" ETERNIT" ROOF TILES (Ilatslhcek's Oliginal Patent). G. R. SPEAKER & CO., 29, MINCING LANE, LONDON, E.C. ENGINEERS Lees than one-half the cost of /and Broseley Tiles. /SURVEYOR Prompt delivferyv .
    [Show full text]
  • Covering the Increased Liability of New Launch Markets
    32nd Space Symposium, Technical Track, Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States of America Presented on April 11-12, 2016 COVERING THE INCREASED LIABILITY OF NEW LAUNCH MARKETS Robert Williams, [email protected] Kevin Walsh, [email protected] ABSTRACT The next generation space race prize is the integration of space dependent technology reliably in modern society. This paper is offered as an examination of an expanding diverse space launch industry as well as the necessity for increased capacity of resources in the underwriting space. Consumers are already space application dependent. There are 1 billion GPS receivers already deployed and expected to grow to 7 billion by 2022. As an example, satellites transformed 800 analogue channels in 1991 to more than 25,000 digital channels today. Without GPS, money isn’t accessible from an ATM. Space plays a greater role in day-to-day life and liability coverage will become more important. If a satellite fails for example, businesses relying on satellite services to function may want to claim for lost income or expenses incurred. Growth of space business has been characterized by a shift away from military and the public over to the private sector. Space activity was largely funded through government bodies such as NASA, the European Space Agency or the Japanese Space Agency. With recent estimates by the Satellite Industry Association placing cumulative satellite industry revenues at over $195.2 billion, a number of private companies are successfully entering the space industry and space application world. Governments and space agencies, which were ordering and building space hardware themselves, are now shifting towards buying services from private companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Lloyd's Credit Report
    AM Best September 2020 Lloyd’s Best’s Rating of Lloyd’s 2020 Lloyd’s September 2020 Lloyd’s Credit Report One Lime Street Best’s Credit Ratings: Rating Effective Date: July 15, 2020 London EC3M 7HA United Kingdom Best’s Financial Strength Rating: A Outlook: Stable Action: Affirmed Best’s Issuer Credit Rating: a+ Outlook: Stable Action: Affirmed Web: www.lloyds.com AMB#: 85202 AIIN#: AA-1122000 Assessment Descriptors Rating Unit - Members Rating Unit: Lloyd’s | AMB #: 085202 Balance Sheet Strength Very Strong AMB # Rating Unit Members Operating Performance Strong 078649 Lloyd’s Ins Co (China) Ltd Business Profile Favorable 095926 Lloyd’s Insurance Co. S.A. Enterprise Risk Management Appropriate Rating Rationale Balance Sheet Strength: Very Strong • The market has the strongest level of risk-adjusted capitalisation, as measured by Best’s Capital Adequacy Ratio (BCAR). • A robust capital-setting regime, which incorporates a risk-based approach to setting member-level capital, helps protect risk- adjusted capitalisation from volatility. • Member-level capital is subject to fungibility constraints as it is held on a several rather than joint basis. • Balance sheet strength is underpinned by a strong Central Fund that is available, at the discretion of the Council of Lloyd’s, to meet the policyholder obligations of all Lloyd’s members. • An offsetting factor is the market’s significant exposure to catastrophe risk and its dependence on reinsurance to manage this risk. Operating Performance: Strong • Lloyd’s is expected to report strong operating performance across the underwriting cycle, Contents taking into account potential volatility due to its catastrophe exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • Longhp2010.Pdf (1.800Mb)
    Lloyd’s of London: Information and Influence in the Nineteenth Century by Hugh Philip Long A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History University of Central Oklahoma 2010 Note to the Reader The newspapers used for this thesis, except the Times (London), come from the online database 19th Century British Library Newspapers, courtesy of the University of Oklahoma and Gale databases. While this source provides full text, it does not include page numbers, so these are lacking in many of the citations. The Making of the Modern World: Goldsmiths‟-Kress Library of Economic Literature 1450-1850 was also invaluable and also provided by Gale databases and the University of Oklahoma. Google Books also facilitated the inclusion of many nineteenth century sources not readily available otherwise. The author would also like to thank Dr. Jessica Sheetz-Nguyen, Dr. Randal Ice and Dr. T.H. Baughman for serving on the thesis committee and providing valuable feedback and guidance throughout the research and writing process, even before this project began. Taylor Long also generously contributed to the editing process. Appreciation is also due the University of Central Oklahoma, Office of Research and Grants, for providing funding for the ongoing study of Lloyd‘s, albeit a different facet, that first introduced me to this topic and provided a foundation for my own research. Table of Contents Introduction 1 Literature and Source Review 9 Chapter 1: Underwriting and the Rise of Lloyd’s 18 Chapter 2: Crisis and Rebirth 39 Chapter 3: Agency and Signal Station Development 63 Conclusion 91 Glossary 96 Bibliography 98 1 Introduction Throughout the nineteenth century, an age when British wealth and global power were still firmly entrenched with colonies and commerce, Lloyd‘s of London and its governing committee cultivated long-standing relationships with the Admiralty and other government bodies through personal, financial, and political networks to secure its dominance in the field of marine insurance.
    [Show full text]
  • DB MF PW RCSTD 0314.Pdf
    DB/MF/PW/RCSTD/0314 10 things to do before you go Important 1. Check the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) travel Under the new travel directive from the European Union (EU), advice online at www.gov.uk/knowbeforeyougo. you are entitled to claim compensation from your airline if any of the following happen. 2. Get travel insurance and check that the cover is appropriate. 1. You are not allowed to board or your flight is cancelled. If you check-in on time but you are not allowed to board 3. Get a good guidebook and get to know the place you are because there are too many passengers for the number of going to. Find out about local laws and customs. seats available or your flight is cancelled, the airline operating the flight must offer you financial compensation. 4. Make sure you have a valid passport and any visas you need. 2. There are long delays. If you are delayed for two hours or more, the airline must 5. Check what vaccinations you need at least six weeks before offer you meals and refreshments, hotel accommodation you go. and communication facilities. If you are delayed for more than five hours, the airline must also offer to refund your 6. Check to see if you need to take extra health precautions ticket. (visit www.nhs.uk/travelhealth) 3. Your baggage is damaged, lost or delayed. 7. Make sure whoever you book your trip through is a If your checked-in baggage is damaged or lost by an EU member of the Association of British Travel Agents (ABTA) airline, you must make a claim to the airline within seven or the Air Travel Organisers' Licensing scheme (ATOL).
    [Show full text]
  • Volunteering Opens up All These ­Opportunities, and This Book Has All the Advice You Need to Get You There
    Are you looking for a more meaningful travel experience? Do you want to give back to the communities you visit, make a genuine connection with locals, meet like-minded travellers and build your skills? International volunteering opens up all these opportunities, and this book has all the advice you need to get you there. Much more than just a resource directory, Volunteer is packed with invaluable information and full-colour inspiration to get you planning your perfect short- or long-term volunteer A Traveller’s Guide to Making a Difference Around the World experience anywhere in the world – whether it’s monitoring sea turtles in Greece, helping set up handicraft businesses in Ghana or building community centres in Guatemala! Features: ~ Unique, user-friendly structure arranged by type of volunteering programme World the Around a Difference A Traveller’s Guide to Making ~ Over 170 organisations listed and reviewed ~ Dozens of seasoned volunteers share their experiences and top tips ~ Written by passionate, well-travelled Lonely Planet authors advised by a team of experts in the field ~ Fully illustrated with colour photographs of volunteers in action www.lonelyplanet.com US $19.99 UK £12.99 2nd Edition A Traveller’s Guide to Making a Difference Around the World Contents 01: INTERNATIONAL VOLUNTEERING: Taxation & National Insurance 83 06: STRUCTURED & SELF-FUNDING Choosing a Mutually Beneficial AN OvERviEW 8 House 83 VOLUNTEER PROGRAMMES 148 Placement 224 Why Volunteer? 9 Vehicle 86 How Do They Work? 149 Further Preparation 224 Kinds of
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Insurance Accounting—Selected Topics
    Basic Insurance Accounting – Selected Topics By Ralph S. Blanchard III, FCAS, MAAA 1 July 2008 CAS Study Note Author’s Change to This Edition This edition of the study note is the same as the June 2007 edition except for the following change to the third paragraph of section 8 on page 23: “Under GAAP all the newly purchased and identified assets and liabilities are to be valued at their “fair value”, with goodwill equal to the difference between the fair value of identified acquired assets and the fair value of identified acquired liabilities” has been changed to “Under GAAP all the newly purchased and identified assets and liabilities are to be valued at their “fair value”, with goodwill equal to the difference between the purchase price and the fair value of identified acquired assets less the fair value of identified acquired liabilities.” Basic Insurance Accounting – Selected Topics The purpose of this study note is to educate actuaries on certain basic insurance accounting topics that may be omitted in other syllabus readings. These topics include: • Loss and loss adjustment expense accounting basics • Reinsurance accounting basics • Examples of how ceded reinsurance impacts an insurers financial statements • Deposit accounting basics In addition, the following two fundamental accounting equations are provided, representing basic equations that may no longer be found in the other syllabus articles but that all actuaries should know. • Assets – Liabilities = Equity (sometimes labeled “net assets” or “surplus”) • Revenue – Expense = Income (with expense including incurred losses and underwriting expenses for an insurance company). (Note: Most accounting systems rely on some form of double-entry bookkeeping, under which all transactions result in debit and credit entries that have to balance.
    [Show full text]
  • Insurance As a Risk Management Instrument for Energy Infrastructure Security and Resilience
    INSURANCE AS A RISK MANAGEMENT INSTRUMENT FOR ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY AND RESILIENCE U.S. Department of Energy Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Infrastructure Security and Energy Restoration Insurance as a Risk Management Instrument for Energy Infrastructure Security and Resilience This page intentionally left blank. U.S. Department of Energy March 2013 Page ii of viii Insurance as a Risk Management Instrument for Energy Infrastructure Security and Resilience Preface This study examines key risks that the Nation‘s critical energy infrastructure is confronting and the ways in which the insurance industry can help manage these risks, including how it identifies, assesses, and manages them and their potential impacts. Today, weather-related incidents account for the majority of economic losses in the insurance industry as well as in the critical infrastructure sectors. In addition to the traditionally-recognized natural hazards, critical energy infrastructure faces significant emerging threats, including cybersecurity and space weather risks. While the United States has a large, mature insurance market, developing insurance mechanisms for protecting critical infrastructure from these emerging risks remains a significant challenge. The lack of historical data on the frequency and severity of these events, the changing nature of technologies impacted by them, as well as the inherent uncertainties posed by these risks make it difficult to accurately assess these emerging risks and develop proper insurance products. Insurance instruments can be a useful risk mitigation tool for critical infrastructure by encouraging resilience-enhancing investments and facilitating recovery after a disaster. However, due to the increased interdependencies across various critical infrastructure systems and sectors as well as the growing dependence of today‘s society on the critical infrastructure functions and advanced technologies, the question of insurability of critical infrastructure against emerging risks faces new challenges.
    [Show full text]